Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of three missense mutations in the homocysteine-related MTHFR and MTRR gene with risk of polycystic ovary syndrome in Southern Chinese women

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 19, Article number: 5 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The etiology between homocysteine and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is unclear. In humans, the level of homocysteine is mainly affected by two enzymes: methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR). While the activity of these two enzymes is mainly affected by three missense mutations, namely C677T (MTHFR), A1298C (MTHFR), and A66G (MTRR). This study aims to examine the association between the three missense mutations and PCOS and investigate whether the three missense mutations exerted their effect on PCOS by affecting the homocysteine level.

Methods

A case-control study was designed, comprising 150 people with PCOS and 300 controls. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between the three missense mutations and PCOS. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between the three missense mutations and the homocysteine level. Mediation analysis was used to investigate whether the three missense mutations exerted their effect on PCOS by affecting the homocysteine level.

Results

Following adjustments and multiple rounds of testing, MTHFR A1298C was found to be significantly associated with PCOS in a dose-dependent manner (compared to AA, OR = 2.142 for AC & OR = 3.755 for CC; P < 0.001). MTRR A66G was nominally associated with PCOS. Mutations in MTHFR A1298C and MTRR A66G were significantly associated with the homocysteine level. Mediation analysis suggested the effect of MTHFR A1298C on PCOS was mediated by homocysteine.

Conclusions

MTHFR A1298C and MTRR A66G were associated with PCOS, and MTHFR A1298C might affect the risk of PCOS by influencing the homocysteine level.

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine and metabolic disease that affects women of childbearing age. There is no cure for PCOS and it is prone to relapse [1,2,3]. Although the etiology of PCOS is not yet completely understood, increasing evidence suggests that it is a multifactorial disease caused by environmental and genetic factors [4,5,6,7]. Environmental factors include environmental toxins, diet and nutrition, socioeconomic status, and geography, which are believed to affect the pathogenesis of PCOS [8,9,10]. Moreover, mutations, polymorphisms, and differential regulation of genes may contribute to the genetic pathogenesis of PCOS [11, 12]. While a limited number of studies have reported relationships between PCOS and several candidate genes [13,14,15], no single gene has yet been identified as a biomarker.

Several studies have shown that an elevated homocysteine level may be related to the pathogenesis of PCOS [16,17,18,19,20]. A previous study found that elevated homocysteine levels could modulate M2 macrophage polarization via estrogen suppression, which promoted insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation in PCOS mice [20]. A multi-center, randomized, controlled trial with 936 participants showed that hyperhomocysteinemia, a medical condition characterized by an abnormally high level of homocysteine in the blood, increased the risk of pregnancy loss and reduced ovulation in people with PCOS [16].

In humans, the level of homocysteine is mainly affected by the metabolism of folic acid and methionine [21], where methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) are the key enzymes [22,23,24,25]. Studies have shown that the activity of these two enzymes is mainly affected by three missense mutations, namely C677T (MTHFR), A1298C (MTHFR), and A66G (MTRR) [23, 26, 27]. The C677T mutation is the substitution of base C at the 677 site with T, leading to the substitution of alanine with valine, which results in a thermolabile variant with reduced activity. The mutation of MTHFR A1298C is the substitution of base A to C at the 1298 site, leading to the substitution of glutamic acid with alanine, which reduces enzyme activity. The MTRR A66G mutation alters isoleucine into a methionine residue in the protein chain and subsequently disrupts the methionine/homocysteine cycle.

Therefore, we hypothesize that C677T, A1298C, and A66G may be risk factors for PCOS, acting through an increased level of homocysteine. In this case-control study, we performed a genotype analysis for the three missense mutations to elucidate if they were risk factors for PCOS. Furthermore, we examined whether the three mutations exerted their effect in PCOS by affecting the homocysteine level.

Materials and methods

Participants

This study recruited 150 premenopausal women with PCOS from the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zhujiang Hospital of the Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, PR China), between December 2018 and August 2019. All cases had a definitive diagnosis of PCOS, as per the Rotterdam diagnostic criteria [28]. A total of 300 age-matched, healthy, child-bearing women without PCOS were recruited as the control group for the same period. All cases and controls had no history of cancer, diabetes, hypertension, hyperprolactinemia, Cushing’s syndrome, acromegaly, immune system disorders, a recent history of pregnancy, oral contraceptive pill for half a year prior to the study, and no previous treatment with folic acid.

Written informed consent for the study was provided by each participant. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.

Measures

In this study, two fasting venous blood samples were extracted from each subject. One was collected in a normal EP tube for serum measurements, and the other was collected in an anticoagulant-treated EP tube for DNA extraction. Both were stored at − 80℃ until use.

Serum measurements

Serum homocysteine levels were quantified using a cycling enzymatic method on a Mindray BS2000M automatic biochemical analyzer (Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, PR China). The detection limit was determined by analyzing 6 replicates of the zero calibrators and 2 replicates of the lowest nonzero calibrator. If the concentration of homocysteine was more than 50 µmol/L, the sample was manually diluted and retested. The reference range was 5–15 µmol/L.

DNA extraction and genotyping

The DNA samples were extracted by using Magnetic Blood Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen biochemical Technology co., Beijing, China), and were stored at -20 °C until use.

Each DNA sample was assessed for MTRR A66G, MTHFR A1298C, and MTHFR C677T single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the TaqMan-MGB SNPs Genotyping Assay (Applied Bio-systems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Fluorescence quantitative PCR was performed for TaqMan-MGB. The reagents and primers used were all from the Human MTHFR and MTRR Gene Polymorphism Detection Kit (Fluorescence PCR; SurExam Bio-Tech Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, PR China). The PCR amplification conditions were as follows: 95 °C denaturation for 10 min followed by 20 cycles of amplification (92 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s) and 35 cycles of amplification (89 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 90 s). All assays were replicated twice and the genotype allocation was determined by an automatic allele calling the quality value of 0.95.

Statistical analysis

The differences in demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using the Chi-squared test or t-test. The deviation of genotype distribution was tested for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium using the χ2 test. The associations between MTHFR/MTRR mutations and the risk of PCOS were assessed using logistic regression analyses under additive, dominant, and recessive models. Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Linear regression was used to assess the associations between homocysteine and MTHFR/MTRR gene mutations. We further conducted a causal mediation analysis to test whether the association significance between MTHFR/MTRR mutations and PCOS was mediated via homocysteine level. Significance of the mediation effect was conducted using 5000 bootstrapped iterations mean indirect and direct effect. The bootstrapping test was performed using the SPSS PROCESS macro to test the statistical significance of the mediating effect [29].

For all multivariable models, potential confounders, including age, BMI, history of smoking, drinking, and hypertensive family history were adjusted. A two-tailed P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The SPSS 19.0 statistical package was used for all data analyses.

Results

Participant characteristics

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the participants. The mean age of the PCOS group was 27.02 ± 4.76 years, which was not significantly different from that of the control group (p = 0.363). Consistent with previous meta-analysis [30], the percentage of overweight or obesity in PCOS group is higher than the control group. The PCOS group subjects had a significantly lower folate level and higher homocysteine level compared to the control subjects. For the other characteristics, there was no significant difference between participants in the two groups.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants
Full size table

For the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, no significant deviation from the expected population genotype proportions was detected at the MTHFR C677T (χ2 = 2.41, P = 0.12), MTHFR A1298C (χ2 = 3.65, P = 0.06), and MTRR A66G (χ2 = 3.42, P = 0.06).

Association of three missense mutations in MTHFR and MTRR genes and PCOS risk

Table 2 shows the genetic associations between the three MTHFR/MTRR mutations and PCOS in both univariable and multivariable additive, dominant, and recessive models. The MTHFR A1298C showed a significant association with PCOS under all the three models, and the association remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders and Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was applied (P < 0.016). In the multivariable analysis of the additive model for MTHFR A1298C, a clear dose dependency was observed. Compared to the reference group (AA), those who carried one risk allele (AC) had 2.142 times higher risk of developing PCOS, and those who carried two risk alleles (CC) had 3.755 times higher risk. The MTRR A66G was nominally associated with PCOS (0.016 < p < 0.05) under the additive and recessive models, but not the dominant model. There was no association between MTHFR C677T and PCOS.

Table 2 Genotype distribution of MTHFR, MTRR mutations in the cases and controls according to additive, dominant, and recessive models
Full size table

After removing obese women from both studied groups, we found similar results (data not shown).

Association of three missense mutations in MTHFR and MTRR genes and serum homocysteine level

Table 3 shows associations between the three MTHFR/MTRR mutations and the serum homocysteine level for all participants after adjusting for potential confounders. Mutations in MTHFR A1298C and MTRR A66G were significantly associated with the serum homocysteine level. Participants having more risk alleles had a significant positive association with higher serum homocysteine levels than those with less. For example, compared to people who had no risk allele (AA), those who had one risk allele (AC) in MTHFR A1298C was 0.867 µmol/L higher in the homocysteine level, and two risk alleles (CC) was 2.092 µmol/L higher.

Table 3 Association of the three MTHFR/MTRR mutations and homocysteine levels
Full size table

Mediation analysis

Table 4 shows whether the associations between three MTHFR/MTRR mutations and PCOS were mediated via homocysteine levels. The casual mediation analysis indicated that the effect of MTHFR A1298C on PCOS was mediated via the homocysteine level (indirect effect = 0.772 for AC; 1.861 for CC; p < 0.05 for both). For MTRR A66G, only the effect of the phenotype GG on PCOS was mediated via the homocysteine level (indirect effect = 0.623; p < 0.05). For both the MTHFR A1298C and MTRR A66G, no significant direct effect was observed. There was no direct or indirect association between MTHFR C677T and homocysteine level on PCOS.

Table 4 Mediation analysis of associations between three MTHFR/MTRR mutations and PCOS risk (mediated by homocysteine)
Full size table

Discussion

Studies showed that an elevated homocysteine level may be related to the pathogenesis of PCOS. In this case-control study, we found that two mutations in homocysteine-related genes, namely MTHFR A1298C and MTRR A66G, were associated with the risk of PCOS, and the associations were mediated through influencing the level of homocysteine.

In our study, MTHFR A1298C was highly associated with PCOS after adjusting for potential confounders. Compared to the wild-type genotype AA, mutant homozygote genotype AC had a 2.142 times higher risk of PCOS, and CC had 3.755 times higher risk of PCOS, which showed that the effect size was stronger for each additional risk allele C. In agreement with our study, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that MTHFR A1298C was associated with PCOS susceptibility [31]. For MTRR A66G, our results suggest an association with PCOS, but no significant association was found after multiple tests. A case-control study with 203 Brazilian participants showed that the polymorphic homozygous mutation of MTRR A66G was associated with protective factors for PCOS [32]. For the MTHFR C677T, we did not observe an association with PCOS; conflicting results have been reported, ranging from no observed association Poland [33] to the T allele being a risk factor for PCOS in the Korean population [34]. Such different conclusions of studies may be due to genetic mutations, race, region, and other factors, or due to differences in sample size.

Importantly, we also found that the association between MTHFR A1298C and PCOS was mediated by the serum homocysteine level. Mediation analysis examines what proportion of the SNP-PCOS association travels through homocysteine and acknowledges the fraction of the association that is independent of homocysteine. The result of the mediation analysis showed that the effect of A1298C on PCOS was through homocysteine. To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the potential mechanism underlying the association between genetic factors and the risk of PCOS. In addition, there is a biologically expected direction for the effect of A1298C on homocysteine and PCOS, in that A1298C with more risk alleles increased homocysteine levels and the risk of PCOS, which supports the mediation analysis results.

Homocysteine is a protein that is synthesized in the body and, ideally, is in low concentrations in the blood [35]. Elevated homocysteine is a risk factor for many diseases, including PCOS and cardiovascular disease [36,37,38,39,40,41]. Therefore, our finding of the association between the homocysteine-related mutations and PCOS supports previous studies. However, to confirm the causality of the homocysteine levels and PCOS, a mendelian randomization study is needed. As the mutations of A1298C affect the function of MTHFR, drugs that treat MTHFR may reduce the risk of PCOS. Furthermore, as people with PCOS have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, there may be an assumption that PCOS patients with a MTHFR A1298C AC/CC genotype may be prone to cardiovascular disease [42]. A key strength of this study is that we used mediation analysis to explain the biological rationality of the association between the risk mutations and PCOS. Furthermore, potential confounders were taken into account in the regression analyses.

However, several study limitations exist. Similar to other case-control studies, our study has limited verification of causality, but with the observations of other epidemiological supports from the Bradford-Hill Criteria [43], such as the temporal relation between the genes and PCOS outcome, the strong magnitude of effect, clear allele dose dependency, and biological plausibility, our findings increased the possibility of causality. Although the percentage of overweight or obesity in PCOS group is significantly higher than the control group (11.3% vs. 5.7%), there might be some inclusion bias since the pooled estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity in people with PCOS was 61% [30]. Another limitation is that we used convenience samples to examine the relationship between the risk alleles and homocysteine level, which prevented control of the representativeness of the samples. This lack of control may cause biased samples and research results, and thus limit the wider application of the study. In addition, as the association between the three mutations with PCOS may be ethnic-specific and the interactions between genes and the environment may also modulate PCOS risk, the findings of the present study need to be verified in different populations and other larger cohort studies.

In conclusion, MTHFR A1298C and MTRR A66G were associated with PCOS, and MTHFR A1298C might affect the risk of PCOS by influencing the homocysteine level. Drugs that treat MTHFR may reduce the risk of PCOS for people with the MTHFR A1298C AC/CC genotype.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PCOS:

Polycystic ovary syndrome

MTHFR:

Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase

MTRR:

Methionine synthase reductase

SNPs:

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

References

  1. TREA Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):321–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA, Hoeger KM, Murad MH, Pasquali R, Welt CK. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):4565–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nardo LG, Patchava S, Laing I. Polycystic ovary syndrome: pathophysiology, molecular aspects and clinical implications. Panminerva Med. 2008;50(4):267.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Glintborg D, Andersen M. An update on the pathogenesis, inflammation, and metabolism in hirsutism and polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;26(4):281–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Christakou C, Marinakis E. Phenotypes and enviromental factors: their influence in PCOS. Curr Pharm Design. 2012;18(3):270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Kandarakis H, Legro RS. The role of genes and environment in the etiology of PCOS. Endocrine. 2006;30(1):19–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rutkowska AZ, Diamanti-Kandarakis E. Polycystic ovary syndrome and environmental toxins. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):948–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dumesic DA, Oberfield SE, Stener-Victorin E, Marshall JC, Laven JS, Legro RS. Scientific statement on the diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and molecular genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(5):487–525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Merkin SS, Phy JL, Sites CK, Yang D. Environmental determinants of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(1):16–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Azziz R. PCOS in 2015: New insights into the genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(3):183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Day F, Karaderi T, Drong RM, Kraft A, Lin P, Huang N, Broer H, Magi L, Saxena R, et al. Large-scale genome-wide meta-analysis of polycystic ovary syndrome suggests shared genetic architecture for different diagnosis criteria. PLos Genet. 2018;14(12):e1007813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiam M-A, Laven T. The genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome: an overview of candidate gene systematic reviews and genome-wide association studies. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruth KS, Beaumont RN, Tyrrell J, Jones SE, Tuke MA, Yaghootkar H, Wood AR, Freathy RM, Weedon MN, Frayling TM, et al. Genetic evidence that lower circulating FSH levels lengthen menstrual cycle, increase age at menopause and impact female reproductive health. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):473–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones MR, Brower MA, Xu N, Cui J, Mengesha E, Chen YD, Taylor KD, Azziz R, Goodarzi MO. Systems genetics reveals the functional context of PCOS loci and identifies genetic and molecular mechanisms of disease heterogeneity. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(8):e1005455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang H, Xie L, Ge H, Wu Q, Wen Y, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Ma H, Gao J, Wang CC, et al. Effects of hyperhomocysteinaemia and metabolic syndrome on reproduction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a secondary analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(6):990–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li D, Liu H, Fang Y, Huo J, Wu Q, Wang T, Zhou Y, Wang X, Ma X. Hyperhomocysteinemia in polycystic ovary syndrome: decreased betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase and cystathionine β-synthase-mediated homocysteine metabolism. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(2):234–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diwaker A, Kishore D. Evaluation of plasma homocysteine levels in patients of PCOS. J Assoc Physicians India. 2018;66(10):17–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fouani FZ, Fadaei R, Moradi N, Zandieh Z, Ansaripour S, Yekaninejad MS, Vatannejad A, Mahmoudi M. Circulating levels of Meteorin-like protein in polycystic ovary syndrome: a case-control study. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(4):e231943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Qi X, Zhang B, Zhao Y, Li R, Chang HM, Pang Y, Qiao J. Hyperhomocysteinemia promotes insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation in PCOS mice through modulating M2 macrophage polarization via estrogen suppression. Endocrinology. 2017;158(5):1181–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Portillo F, Vázquez J, Pajares MA. Protein-protein interactions involving enzymes of the mammalian methionine and homocysteine metabolism. Biochimie. 2020;173:33–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Forges T, Chery C, Audonnet S, Feillet F, Gueant J. Life-threatening methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) deficiency with extremely early onset: Characterization of two novel mutations in compound heterozygous patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2010;100(2):143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, Boers GJ, den Heijer M, Kluijtmans LA, van den Heuvel LP. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet. 1995;10(1):111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holmes MV, Newcombe P, Hubacek JA, Sofat R, Ricketts SL, Cooper J, Breteler MM, Bautista LE, Sharma P, Whittaker JC, et al. Effect modification by population dietary folate on the association between MTHFR genotype, homocysteine, and stroke risk: a meta-analysis of genetic studies and randomised trials. The Lancet. 2011;378(9791):584–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Watkins D, Rosenblatt DS. Update and new concepts in vitamin responsive disorders of folate transport and metabolism. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(4):665–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weisberg I, Tran P, Christensen B, Sibani S, Rozen R. A second genetic polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) associated with decreased enzyme activity. Mol Genet Metab. 1998;64(3):169–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Olteanu H, Munson T, Banerjee R. Differences in the efficiency of reductive activation of methionine synthase and exogenous electron acceptors between the common polymorphic variants of human methionine synthase reductase†. Biochemistry-Us. 2002;41(45):13378–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. TREA Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(1):19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan Y, Li J, Jing Z, Yu C, Zhao D, Hao W, Zhou C. The role of mental health and physical activity in the association between sleep quality and quality of life among rural elderly in China: a moderated mediation model. J Affect Disorders. 2020;273:462–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lim SS, Davies MJ, Norman RJ, Moran LJ. Overweight, obesity and central obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(6):618–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu X, Hong X, Chen L, Xuan Y, Huang K, Wang B. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphisms with genetic susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Gene. 2019;719:144079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Santos TBD, Paula HKD, Balarin MAS, Silva-Grecco RL, Lima MFP, Resende EAMR, Gomes MKO, Cintra MTR. Can the genetic polymorphisms of the folate metabolism have an influence in the polycystic ovary syndrome? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63:501–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Szafarowska M, Segiet A, Jerzak MM. Methylenotetrahydrololate reductase A1298C and C677T polymorphisms and adverse pregnancy outcome in women with PCOS. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2016;37(2):141.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ożegowska K, Bogacz A, Bartkowiak-Wieczorek J, Seremak-Mrozikiewicz A, Pawelczyk L. Is there an association between the development of metabolic syndrome in PCOS patients and the C677T MTHFR gene polymorphism? Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(4):246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Finkelstein JD, Martin JJ. Homocysteine. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2000;32(4):385–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kozakova M, Morizzo C, Penno G, Shore AC, Nilsson J, Palombo C. Plasma homocysteine and cardiovascular organ damage in a population with a high prevalence of risk factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(8).

  37. Mondal K, Chakraborty P, Kabir SN. Hyperhomocysteinemia and hyperandrogenemia share PCSK9-LDLR pathway to disrupt lipid homeostasis in PCOS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503(1):8–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Akhtar N. Is homocysteine a risk factor for atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(12):1370–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schiuma N, Costantino A, Bartolotti T, Dattilo M, Bini V, Aglietti MC, Renga M, Favilli A, Falorni A, Gerli S. Micronutrients in support to the one carbon cycle for the modulation of blood fasting homocysteine in PCOS women. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020;43(6):779–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yilmaz N, Pektas M, Tonguc E, Kilic S, Gulerman C, Gungor T, Mollamahmutoglu L. The correlation of plasma homocysteine with insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(3):384–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu Y, Huang Y, Hu Y, Zhong J, He Z, Li W, Yang Y, Xu D, Wu S. Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor in young patients with coronary artery disease in southern China. Herz. 2013;38(7):779–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yaralı H, Yıldırır A, Aybar F, Kabakçı G, Bükülmez O, Akgül E, Oto A. Diastolic dysfunction and increased serum homocysteine concentrations may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertili Sterili. 2001;76(3):511–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cox LA. Modernizing the Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causal relationships in observational data. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018;48(8):682–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thanks for the technical support provided by SurExam Bio-Tech Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, PR China and also for all the friends who helped, supported and encouraged me, especially Miss. Yuan Feilan.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers: 81701418], the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong province [grant number: 2014A020212667].

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wanqin Feng and Yan Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.253, Gongye Middle Avenue, Haizhu District, 510280, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Wanqin Feng, Minjuan Liu, Wenyu Mo, Xiaoyang Wang & Ying Ma

  2. Clinical Research Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510280, Guangzhou, China

    Yan Zhang

  3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510280, Guangzhou, China

    Yuan Pan & Yi Zhang

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguan People’s Hospital, 523000, Dongguan, China

    Minjuan Liu

  5. Department of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510280, Guangzhou, China

    Yuxin Huang, Yuanling Xiao & Dan Tian

  6. Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, Obstetrics and Gynecology Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510280, Guangzhou, China

    Junjie Jiao

  7. Department of Emergency, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510280, Guangzhou, China

    Lixia Yang

Authors
  1. Wanqin Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuan Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Minjuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuxin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuanling Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenyu Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Junjie Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaoyang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Dan Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Lixia Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ying Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MY, FWQ, ZY: designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript ; FWQ, PY, ZY, WXY, TD, YLX: conducted the experiments; FWQ, ZY: analyzed the data; MY, LMJ, HYX, XYL, MWY, JJJ: recruit subjects. All of the authors gave final approval to the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University and has been performed in accordance with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, W., Zhang, Y., Pan, Y. et al. Association of three missense mutations in the homocysteine-related MTHFR and MTRR gene with risk of polycystic ovary syndrome in Southern Chinese women. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 19, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00688-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00688-8

Keywords

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us