- Open Access
hCG, the wonder of today's science
© Cole; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 November 2011
Accepted: 28 March 2012
Published: 28 March 2012
hCG is a wonder. Firstly, because hCG is such an extreme molecule. hCG is the most acidic glycoprotein containing the highest proportion of sugars. Secondly, hCG exists in 5 common forms. Finally, it has so many functions ranging from control of human pregnancy to human cancer. This review examines these molecules in detail.
These 5 molecules, hCG, sulfated hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG, hCG free beta and hyperglycosylated free beta are produced by placental syncytiotrophoblast cells and pituitary gonadotrope cells (group 1), and by placental cytotrophoblast cells and human malignancies (group 2). Group 1 molecules are both hormones that act on the hCG/LH receptor. These molecules are central to human menstrual cycle and human pregnancy. Group 2 molecules are autocrines, that act by antagonizing a TGF beta receptor. These molecules are critical to all advanced malignancies.
The hCG groups are molecules critical to both the molecules of pregnancy or human life, and to the advancement of cancer, or human death.
Let's get to the point, why do we call human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) the wonder of today's science. Firstly, hCG is an extreme molecule. It is the most acid protein in humans, some hCG variants have a peak isoelectric point (pI) stretching to pI 3.1. hCG variants are the most sialylated glycoproteins with up to 15 sialic acid residues per molecule. hCG variants are the most glycosylated of glycoproteins, hCG containing 30% sugar by molecular weight, hyperglycosylated hCG containing 39% sugar and hyperglycosylated hCG free ß-subunit containing 42% sugar by molecular weight. Finally, with its extreme molecular weights, hCG is the longest circulating molecule in human blood with a circulating half life of 36 hours. Secondly, as described in this review, there are amazingly 5 unique variants of hCG, each having identical amino acid sequence, produced by different cells and having independent functions. These are hCG, sulfated hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG, hCG free ß-subunit and hyperglycosylated hCG free ß-subunit. There is no other molecule like hCG.
Finally, hCG and its variants have an incredibly wide spectrum of biological functions. These range from hyperglycosylated hCG and pregnancy implantation and placental development, to hyperglycosylated hCG and hCG and hemochorial placentation. They also include hCG and fetal and uterine growth and numerous other key functions during pregnancy. Sulfated hCG is produced by the pituitary in women and controls steroidogenesis during the menstrual cycle and ovulation of the oocyte. Fascinatingly, a hyperglycosylated hCG/hCG free ß pathway is the center-point of all advanced human cancer biology, driving cancer growth, cancer invasion and cancer malignancy. This is not forgetting the key evolutionary role that chorionic gonadotropin variants play in the evolution of humans, most notably development of the hemochorial placentation system, that supports the development of the human brain. You could call hCG and its variants the everything molecules.
A common question is why are the 5 independent variants of hCG all called hCG. This is because they all share a common α-subunit and ß-subunit amino acid sequence.
I remember when I first discovered hyperglycosylated hCG as an hCG variant back in 1977 . I first named it "invasive trophoblast antigen" because we knew at that time that it independently drove implantation of pregnancy and invasion by choriocarcinoma cells. Within 2 years I received an official letter from the World Health Organization instructing me to rename it a molecule containing the name hCG, because it contains hCG amino acid sequence. I renamed it hyperglycosylated hCG based on its structure.
hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG, hemochorial placentation and evolution
A major function of hCG during pregnancy can be described as driving hemochorial placentation, or the efficient method whereby humans drive nutrient transfer to the fetus. hCG, fetal hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG seeming have many critical roles during pregnancy (See Section hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG and pregnancy). Almost every medical text book sold today describe the sole function of hCG as driving luteal steroidogenesis. This is a very out of date description of hCG, summarizing research in the 1910s, 1920s and 1930s [9–12], books surely must be more up to date than this period. Over 100 publications in the 1970s-2010s describe and confirm the many established functions of hCG variants. Why is everything so out of date? Looking at the section of this review on hCG function during pregnancy, if there is only room to describe just one of the many functions it should be driving hemochorial placentation as described here, and not just maintaining progesterone production by the corpus luteum for 3-4 weeks.
Hyperglycosylated hCG functions in implantation are proven [13–16]. That hyperglycosylated hCG drives cytotrophoblast growth is shown and confirmed [8, 13, 14, 16, 17]. That hCG promotes the fusion of peripheral cytotrophoblast cells to syncytiotrophoblast cells is also proven . That hCG drive uterine artery angiogenesis is demonstrated and confirmed multiple times [19–26]. Finally that hCG forms the umbilical circulation has been demonstrated [27–32]. Putting all these synthetic facts together, putting villous trophoblast tissue with maternal spiral arteries with fetal uterine circulation and you have hemochorial placentation. Clearly, the combination of hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG drive all event leading to hemochorial placentation . This is suggested, however, but it has not been proven. As described in Section hCG, Hyperglycosylated hCG, Hemochorial Placentation and Evolution, human hCG is dramatically different to primate hCG. Can we prove that hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG drive hemochorial placentation in humans. No, the research would be unethical. The only evidence that hCG related molecules are the driving force of hemochorial placentation is the first appearance of invasive hemochorial placentation in early simian primates. Primates first evolved 80 million years ago, early simian primates evolved just 37 million years. Interestingly, chorionic gonadotropin (CG) and hyperglycosylated CG first evolved in this same species. The logical reason that hemochorial placentation developed is the parallel evolution of its driving signal CG and hyperglycosylated CG.
Parallelisms between placental implantation and hemochorial placentation in primates, sugar structure on CG or LH, and relative brain masses
Depth of Invasion
Molecule produce; # oligosaccharides (oligos); pI of dimer; circulating 1/2-life; relative biopotency
Brain mass(% body weight)
First appearance (million years ago)
1/3 rd myometrium
CG; 8 oligos; pI 3.5; 1/2-life 36 h, 109X
Advanced simian primates
CG; 6 oligos; pI 4.9; 1/2-life 6 h; 18X
Early simian primates
CG; 5 oligos; pI 6.3; 1/2-life 2.4 h; 7.3X
LH; 3 oligos; pI 9.0; 1/2-life 0.33 h; 1X
With advancing evolution came advanced simian primates, example: orangutan. Following mutation in the CG genes, advanced simian primates produced a more acidic CG with 6 acidic oligosaccharides. This had a calculated circulating 1/2-life of 6 hours (Table 1) or had a biopotency of 18X more than prosimian LH. With it extra biopotency hyperglycosylated CG implanted this placenta through the decidua and to 10% of the width of the uterine wall or myometrial muscle. This species had significantly more potent hemochorial placentation leading to the development of a brain of 0.74% of body mass (Table 1) [33–44]. Humans evolved after many mutations in the hCG genes. This led to a super acidic hCG, pI 3.5 with 8 acidic oligosaccharides. This human hCG is the most acidic glycoprotein with the highest proportion of sugars occurring in any primate or in humans. This super-hCG raised the circulating 1/2-life to an incredible 36 hours, or to a biopotency of 109X over prosimian LH. It is this super hCG and super-hyperglycosylated hCG that drove implantation to as deep as 1/3rd the thickness of the myometrium (Table 1), and drove hemochorial placentation to the extreme of efficiency. It was this super-hCG and this hemochorial placentation that permitted the development of the 2.4% of body mass human brain.
The mechanism whereby humans developed ultra-efficient placentation has defied evolutionary scientist for many years [37–39]. This is all explained by the evolution of CG (biopotency 7, 3X), and the advancing evolution of CG, early-simian primate (biopotency 18X), advanced simian primate (18X) and humans (109X). In the human fetus, developing the large brain is not easy, it uses 60% of transferred glucose and oxygen, leaving the development of some human organs lacking in nutrients [37–39].
In many respects this review of the role of CG and hyperglycosylated CG in human evolution does not end at this point. Recent research shows that these potent implantation and growth factors are at the root of pregnancy failures in humans (see Section Hyperglycosylated hCG, Failing Pregnancy and Hypertense Pregnancy). Also human malignancies take advantage of these super-potent invasion and growth factors in the human genome to stimulate growth and invasion of all advanced human malignancies. This is discussed in Section Hyperglycosylated hCG, hCG free ß-subunit and Cancer. CG is a wondrous molecule that seemingly was only generated to advance evolution to humans. Unfortunately humans have to live with the terrors of this wondrous molecule in their genome.
hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG and pregnancy
hCG is measured during pregnancy by either the total hCG test, which supposedly measured all hCG variants plus its ß-subunit, or by an intact hCG assay, which supposedly measured dimeric molecules only. I say supposedly in that most laboratory total hCG tests sold today, invariably detect hCG, hCG free ß-subunit and other hCG degradation products and variants . It is assumed that a similar variability occurs with intact hCG assays. I recommend one automated hCG test, the Siemens Immulite series of hCG test. This use two antibodies to the core of ß-subunit and detects most hCG degradation products and variants on a equi-molar basis .
Concentration of total hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG (hCG-H) in 496 serum samples from 310 women with term pregnancies measured using the Siemens Immulite 1000 total hCG assay
Gestation age (weeks since start of menstrual period)
Median Total hCG ng/ml
Range Total hCG ng/ml (variation)
Median hCG-H ng/ml
Range hCG-H ng/ml (variation)
3-weeks (3 weeks 0 days - 6 days)
n = 42
0.26 (16 of 42 < 0.1 ng/ml)
0.04 - 5.5
0.20(16 of 42 < 0.1 ng/ml)
0.01 - 6.45 (645X)
n = 42
0.21 - 173 (824X)
0.18 - 160 (888X)
n = 67
1.86 - 1308 (704X)
0.96 - 698 (731X)
n = 29
3.80 - 855 (225X)
0.76 - 629 (827X)
n = 30
203 - 7,766 (38X)
27 - 931 (34X)
n = 33
1,064 - 10,057 (9.4X)
67 - 1050 (15.6X)
n = 24
1,031 - 11,586 (11.2X)
102 - 1158 (11.3X)
n = 20
1,952 - 19,958 (10.2X)
188 - 1855 (9.9X)
11 - 13 weeks
n = 41
1,440 - 15,318 (10.6X)
24 - 330 (13.7X)
14 - 17 weeks
n = 57
311 - 4,757 (15.2X)
6.7 - 129 (19.3X)
18 - 26-weeks
n = 62
210 - 6,223 (30.3X)
5.3 - 95 (17.9X)
27 - 40 weeks
n = 49
184 - 8,530 (46.4X)
0.3 - 12.2 (40.6X)
hCG levels vary extraordinarily widely between pregnancies . hCG concentration varies among individual and among pregnancies from 0.21 ng/ml to 173 ng/ml in the 4th week of gestation (variation 824X), and varies from 1.86 ng/ml to 1,308 ng/ml in the 5th week of gestation (variation 704X) (Table 2). This variation can be attributed to poor dating of pregnancy, dating to the first day of the last menstrual period, rather than to the day of true start of pregnancy or implantation. The variation can also be attributed to varying hCG doubling rate among syncytiotrophoblast cells in individual pregnancies . Seemingly, hCG levels rise differently among different pregnancies. As found, the spare receptor theory explains how pregnancies cope with such extreme variations in concentration. Under the spare receptor theory, when a small proportion of receptors is activated it may yield similar cellular response to when all receptors are activated [49–51]. This is due to plateaus in receptor G protein and cyclic AMP response [49–51]. Also down-regulation [52–54] can explain how a pregnancy accommodates wide variation in hCG concentration. A high concentration of hCG, for instance, may decrease the number of receptor on cells by degrading the receptor transcript rate.
Authors and reference
First pregnancy test, the Zondek-Aschein Pregnancy Test
Zondek B, Aschein S 
First immunological pregnancy test, an antibody agglutination test
Wide L, Gemzell CA 
First hCG radioimmunoassay
Aono T, Goldstein DP, Taymor ML, Dolch K 
Discovery of hCGß radioimmunoassay, assay only detects hCG
Vaitukaitis JL, Braunstein GD, Ross GF 
First hCG radio-immunometric assay
Armstrong EG, Ehrlich PH, Birken S, Schlatterer JP, Siris E, Hembree WE, Canfield RE 
Automated hCG chemiluminescent-immunometric assay
Vankrieken L, Hertogh RE 
In 1967 the hCG radioimmunoassay replaced the agglutination test  (Table 3). The radioimmunoassay (RIA) was a much more sensitive and quantitative pregnancy test. In an RIA, a small but known amount of radio-iodinated hCG competed with the unknown serum or urine hCG in binding a limiting quantity of antibody. The antibody was precipitated and radioactivity measured. The lower the radioactivity the higher the unknown concentration of hCG. Unfortunately, due to the common α-subunit on hCG and LH, the hCG RIA recognized both hCG and LH. In 1972 the hCGß RIA was introduced  (Table 3). This was the first pregnancy test detecting only hCG.
In 1984 I saw the introduction of a new hCG antibody technology, the immunometric assay  (Table 3). Simply explained, an antibody to one immunological site on hCG (i.e. anti α-subunit) was immobilized on beads or on a tube. Blood or urine was added and this antibody extracted hCG, the antigen, from the solution. An antibody to a second separate site (i.e. anti ß-subunit) was labeled with a radioactivity or other tracer. This antibody, the tracer antibody, was added to the mix, it bound the immobilized antigen to form a sandwich. An immobilized antibody-hCG-tracer antibody-label complex was formed. The tracer antibody permitted quantitation of the bound antigen. The following years saw a need to automate and speed up assays, and to develop new tracers other than radioiodine. Chemiluminescence was discovered, where by a tracer emits light with limited emission of heat, as the result of a chemical reaction. In 1995 an automated chemiluminescent hCG assay was introduced . Today, 2011, most laboratory hCG tests are automated and are immunometric assays using the chemiluminescent principal.
The biological functions of hCG during pregnancy
1. Promotion of corpus luteal progesterone production
2. Angiogenesis of uterine vasculature
3. Cytotrophoblast differentiation
4. Immuno-suppression and blockage of phagocytosis of invading trophoblast cells
5. Growth of uterus in line with fetal growth
6. Quiescence of uterine muscle contraction
7. Promotion of growth of fetal organs
8. Umbilical cord growth and development
9. Blastocysts signals uterine decidua prior to invasion regarding pending implantation
10. hCG in sperm and receptors found in fallopian tubes suggesting pre-pregnancy communication
11. hCG receptors in hippocampus and brain stem, may cause nausea and vomiting in pregnancy
B. Hyperglycosylated hCG
1. Stimulates implantation by invasion of cytotrophoblast cells as occurs at implantation of pregnancy
2. Stimulates growth of placenta by promoting growth of cytotrophoblast cells
C. hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG together
1. Drives hemochorial placentation
The original biological activity of hCG was first revealed in the 1920s [9–11]. That hCG takes over from LH in promotion of progesterone production by ovarian corpus luteal cells in pregnant women was shown in the nineteen sixties [6, 88] (Table 4). As we know today, hCG only promotes progesterone production for 3-4 weeks following pregnancy implantation. This function is active for less than 10% of the length of pregnancy. As shown in Table 2, hCG reaches a peak at 10 weeks of gestation, or almost one month after progesterone promotion is complete, then continues to be produced through the length of pregnancy. Clearly, progesterone production is not the principal function of hCG even though this is the hCG function highlighted in most medical text books.
Four independent research groups show that hCG promotes an anti-macrophage inhibitory factor or a macrophage migration inhibitory factor. This is a cytokine that modulates the immune response during pregnancy. This reduces macrophage phagocytosis activity at the placenta-uterus interface, preventing destruction of the foreign fetoplacental tissue by the mothers macrophage system [62–64]. Four other groups have shown that hCG may directly suppress any immune action against the invading foreign tissue by the mother [65–67, 89]. All told, hCG appears to be important in preventing rejection of fetoplacental tissue during pregnancy [62–67, 89]. Most observations suggest that hCG has an inhibitory or suppressive function on macrophage activity. One group, Wan et al.  demonstrated that chorionic gonadotropin can directly enhance innate immunity by stimulating macrophage function.
Multiple groups have found hCG/LH receptor in the myometrium of the uterus. It has been indicated by two groups that uterine growth in line with fetal growth is controlled by hCG [68, 69]. Four other groups have shown that hCG relaxes myometrial contractions during pregnancy. hCG acts on a BK-Ca calcium activated channel during pregnancy to relax the myometrium amd prevent contractions [68, 70–72]. hCG levels drop during the final weeks of pregnancy. It has been suggested that this drop may be the cause of increased contractions in the weeks prior to parturition.
Four independent reports show that the blastocyst preimplantation secretes hCG into the uterine space which is taken up by hCG/LH receptors on the uterine decidual surface. In response, the decidua is prepared for impending implantation [77–80]. These non-vascular communications by hCG are a critical part of a successful pregnancy. Recent studies show the importance of hCG preimplantation signaling [81–84]. hCG signaling directly causes immunotolerance and angiogenesis at the maternal fetal interface. hCG increases the number of uterine natural killer cells that play a key role in the establishment of pregnancy [81–84].
Other new data shows other pre-pregnancy implantation function of hCG. Publications from Rao et al. and by Gawronska et al. [84–86], show the presence of an hCG/LH receptor (shown by presence of mRNA and demonstration of receptor action) in human sperm and in the fallopian tubes. The function of the hCG/LH receptor in the in sperm is unclear. It possibly has some relationship with fertility. hCG/LH receptor has recently been demonstrated in adult women's brain. CNS receptors are present in several areas of the brain such as the hippocampus, hypothalamus and brain stem [90, 91]. The finding of an hCG receptor in these parts of the brain may explain why hyperemesis gravidarum or nausea and vomiting that occurs during normal pregnancy.
Exciting new research by multiple research groups is finding hCG/LH receptors in fetal organs. Goldsmith et al. , have found hCG/LH receptors in the fetal kidney and liver. Rao et al. [30–32, 74, 75], have located hCG/LH receptors in fetal lungs, liver, kidneys, spleen and small and large intestines. Interestingly, this hCG/LH receptor is present in the fetal organs but completely absent in the adult organs. Seemingly, hCG/LH receptors disappear at birth.
It is suggested that hCG may promote organ growth and differentiation in the fetus. The human fetus seemingly produces its own hCG from the fetal kidneys and liver [73, 76]. The concentrations in fetal circulation are much lower than maternal concentrations, suggesting that placental hCG secretion is directed towards the maternal circulation only and is prevented from entering into fetal circulation . While the hCG receptor has been shown in fetal organs, no function has been directly demonstrated, just suggested. As such, all the findings regarding the fetus have to be considered as just suggestions at this time. Unfortunately, most animals do not make a form of hCG, making the role of hCG in the fetus difficult to prove.
This review claims that there are 5 hCG variants with independent biological activity . There may actually 6 independent hCG variants when one considers fetal hCG. It is made by fetal kidneys and liver [73, 76] so may not be structurally be similar to syncytiotrophoblast sialylated hCG. Our supplies of fetal hCG may be limited to umbilical cord hormone. I am not sure that sufficient fetal hCG will ever be collected to permit structural analysis. Generally speaking only placental and pituitary cells can make glycosylated hCG dimer, other cells only produce free subunits. I wonder, is fetal hCG a dimer, and normally glycosylated? It is only an hCG/LH receptor that has been found in the fetus. Does the fetus produce hyperglycosylated hCG as a growth promoter, acting on a TGFß receptor?
Table 2 shows the concentration of hyperglycosylated hCG in human serum during pregnancy. As shown, hyperglycosylated hCG is the principal hCG form produced in early pregnancy. Hyperglycosylated hCG accounts for 87% of total hCG in the 3 rd week of gestation and 51% of total hCG during the 4th week of gestation, the proportion hyperglycosylated hCG rapidly declines after this point. The high hyperglycosylated hCG in early pregnancy is thought to be the driving signal of deep pregnancy implantation. Not all commercial laboratory, research, point-of-care and home pregnancy tests detect hyperglycosylated hCG equally with hCG. This may make a test inappropriate for early pregnancy detection . In Laurence Cole PhD experience only the Siemens Immulite series of tests is appropriate for laboratory tests, only the Quidel and Beckman series of tests are appropriate as Point-of-Care pregnancy tests and only the Church and Dwight First Response and Answer Home tests are appropriate at Over-the-Counter pregnancy tests. Hyperglycosylated hCG can be separately detected to total hCG using the antibody B152 immunometric test, which only tested hyperglycosylated hCG .
Hyperglycosylated hCG and hCG free ß-subunit are interchangeable cancer promoters functioning by antagonizing a TGFß receptor [7, 8]. It is thought that hyperglycosylated hCG produced in early pregnancy promotes implantation by a similar mechanism, involving antagonism of a TGFß receptor, blockage of apoptosis, and promotion of metalloproteinase and collagenase production [93–95].
Hyperglycosylated hCG has multiple clear functions in human pregnancy implantation and promotion of cytotrophoblast growth (Table 4). Hyperglycosylated hCG is demanded by pregnancy with it unique properties as a TGFß antagonist to drive pregnancy implantation. Implantation is driven in a cancer-like manner. In humans implantation passed through the uterine decidua, uterine stroma and connectictive tissue into the uterine myometrium or muscle surrounding the uterine endometrium. Placenta normally implants at 1/3rd the depth or the myometrium or approximately 40% of the depth of the uterus. Implantation seemingly uses the hyperglycosylated hCG-induced cytotrophoblastic metalloproteinases and collagenase activities to achieve its goal [94, 95]. Cytotrophoblast hyperglycosylated hCG as an autocrine also promotes root placental cytotrophoblast growth during the course of pregnancy to develop and prime growing villous placental tissue (13,14,16,17).
Hyperglycosylated hCG, failing pregnancy and hypertense pregnancy
As discussed in Section hCG, Hyperglycosylated hCG, Hemochorial Placentation and Evolution, and Section hCG, Hyperglycosylated hCG and pregnancy, human hyperglycosylated hCG is the extreme end product of evolution that drives pregnancy implantation to it extreme, and drives production of hemochorial placentation to the extreme. Humans having an extreme molecule to drive implantation are faced with the intricacies and demands of an extreme molecule, so have to face a high proportion of rejected pregnancies, this is miscarriage or spontaneous abortions (17% failure rate) and biochemical pregnancies (25% failure rate) or 25% + 17% or 42% pregnancy failure rate [15, 96]. Simian primates only have an 8% failure rate since they do not have to cope with human hyperglycosylated hCG.
Scientist show that most biochemical pregnancies and spontaneous abortion pregnancies, approximately two-thirds, are due incomplete implantation of pregnancy [97, 98]. As shown by us in two studies examining 62 pregnancies and 127 pregnancies [15, 99], all (100%) of normal term pregnancies (81 and 42 total) produced greater than 40% hyperglycosylated hCG (% of total hCG) on the day of implantation. In contrast, only 8 of 36 and 7 of 20 biochemical and spontaneous aborting pregnancies produced greater than 40% hyperglycosylated hCG on the day of implantation. It is assumed that the failures exceeding 40% hyperglycosylated hCG are the rare genetic abnormalities and that the bulk, 28 of 36 and 13 of 20 pregnancies are pregnancy failures due to improper implantation. It is concluded that hyperglycosylated hCG is an absolute marker of biochemical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion, and that deficiency of hyperglycosylated hCG (< 50% hyperglycosylated hCG) is the actual cause of human pregnancy failures [15, 99].
Unfortunately, to achieve the absolute differentiation of term pregnancy and failing pregnancy the testing has to be performed on the day of implantation of pregnancy. Detection of approximately 80% term pregnancies is possible at later weeks of pregnancy [92, 100].
The hyperglycosylated hCG test is licensed to Quest Diagnostics Inc., and can be ordered from any world-wide Quest Diagnostics laboratory. It also can be ordered from the USA hCG Reference Service. The hyperglycosylated hCG test is also valuable as a high sensitivity marker for Down Syndrome screening [101, 102]. This screening service is currently offered by Quest Diagnostics Inc.
As published, The future sees prenatal screening being expanded to pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and preeclampsia screening, using a hyperglycosylated hCG test. A study by Bahado-Singh and colleagues  and more recent confirming studies by Brennan and colleagues (papers in preparation) shows that hyperglycosylated hCG measurements may be invaluable for screening women in the first and second trimester of pregnancy for these two complication of pregnancy. Today, preeclampsia is the biggest cause of maternal death in pregnancy. Hyperglycosylated hCG promotes hemochorial placentation formation , preeclampsia and PIH are complication of ineffective hemochorial placentation, thus it is marked by unduly low hyperglycosylated hCG. New hyperglycosylated hCG prenatal screening tests will identify women at high risk for PIH and preeclampsia.
Sulfated hCG and the menstrual cycle
Sulfated hCG produced by the pituitary is barely detectable during the menstrual cycle. Sulfated hCG parallels LH during the menstrual cycle. In a recent study, at the time of the LH peak, hCG level in 277 menstrual cycles averaged 1.54 ± 0.90 mIU/ml . In general, during the menstrual cycle sulfated hCG levels are low, approximately one fiftieth of circulating LH level [104–106]. While these levels are small, sulfated hCG is exactly 50-fold more potent that LH . As such sulfated hCG may perform a comparable job to LH in promoting androstenedione production during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, a comparable job in promoting ovulation and corpus luteal formation. It may also perform a comparable job to LH in promoting progesterone production in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. All told, one can no longer correctly say that LH promotes ovulation, it is LH plus sulfated hCG [5, 104–106].
During the menstrual cycle, hypothalamic gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) pulses stimulate follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) ß-subunit and LH ß-subunit genes (the a-subunit is produced in excess) in pituitary gonadotrope cells. The problem is that on chromosome 19 there is a single LH ß-subunit gene located next to 8 hCG duplicated ß-subunit genes. GnRH bombards LH ß-subunit gene and cannot help bombarding some of the adjacent hCG ß-subunit genes leading to pituitary hCG production. Gonadotrope cells can sulfate glycoproteins leading to partially sulfated hCG, LH and FSH.
In menopause, with the absence of steroid feedback to the hypothalamus, GnRH pulse become maximal. The result is promotion of vast excesses of LH, hCG and FSH are produce by gonadotrope cell due to excessive GnRH pulses. Serum LH increases from, 1-90 mIU/ml to > 100 mIU/ml in menopause, serum FSH increases from 1-29 IU/L to 30-200 IU/L in menopause, and serum hCG from < 1 - 3 mIU/ml to 2-39 mIU/ml in menopause. All told, pituitary sulfated hCG is very detectable in a menopausal woman [104–108]. Perimenopause is the stage prior to menopause marked by oligomenorrhea or irregular menstrual periods. Just as perimenopause is marked by the start of raised LH and FSH production, it is also marked by detectable hCG levels.
Use of serum free ß-subunit (hCGß plus hyperglycosylated hCGß) and urine ß-core fragment as tumor markers for detection of malignancies
hCGß as a tumor marker
ß-core fragment as a tumor marker
Number of Cases
Serum hCGß (> 3 pmol/L)
Number of Cases
Urine ß-core fragment (> 3 pmol/L)
The USA hCG Reference Service has examined 88 women producing pituitary sulfated hCG. This is a list of only referred cases and is not a random list of woman over 40 years old. Among the 88 cases, sulfated hCG ranged from 1.8 mIU/ml to 39 mIU/ml . In menopausal cases the median level was 8.0 mIU/ml, in perimenopausal cases the median was 7.2 mIU/ml and in induced menopausal cases, women receiving oophorectomy, the median was 6.3 mIU/ml.
Research by Gronowowski et al. , shows that measurement of FSH levels is a powerful predictor of pituitary sulfated hCG (FSH > 30 IU/L). The USA hCG Reference Service started using FSH as a confirmation of pituitary sulfated hCG one year ago. We both confirm and support the use of FSH testing to affirm the diagnosis of pituitary hCG. Once a woman is diagnosed as producing pituitary sulfated hCG, what do you do next? The only answer is "nothing," it is normal, it is natural, you need to completely ignore it. A physician can confirm that we are dealing with pituitary hCG, as described above, by administering a high estrogen oral contraceptive, to suppress hCG, for 3 weeks.
Hyperglycosylated hCG, hCG free ß-subunit and cancer
My PhD at Medical College of Wisconsin was regarding structure of this hCG-variant produced by 2 cervical cancer cell lines, DoT and Caski. As shown, these cell lines produce a invariably glycosylated variant of hCG free ß-subunit. Soon after getting my PhD, I went on to a postdoctoral fellowship at University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and showed that hCG free ß-subunit was a tumor marker present in culture fluids, serum and urine, and patented hCG free ß-subunit and its variants including ß-core fragment as a tumor markers . This patent was licensed by Ciba-Corning Laboratories, the predecessor to Quest Diagnostics 1985-1999
Multiple studies in the early 1980s showed that serum hCG free ß-subunit and urine ß-core fragment its degradation product, were tumor marker for all cancers (Table 5). As shown and averaged over multiple studies [109–125] (Table 5), hCG free ß-subunit and ß-core fragment marked a proportion of all malignancies. All told, hCG free ß-subunit marked 30% of 1,164 malignancies in serum tests, at the extremes, 17% of colorectal cancers, and 38% of ovarian cancers [109–125] (Table 5). All told and averaged, hCG ß-core fragment marked 48% of 1,027 malignancies in urine tests, at the extremes, 45% of lung cancers, and 66% of ovarian cancers (Table 5) [109–125].
In the years that followed Acevedo and Krichevsky  and Regelson  used cancer membrane flow cytometry methods to show that all advanced cancers produced an hCG free ß-subunit variant. An investigation into hCG degradation at that time showed that hCG free ß-subunit (circulating 1/2-life 0.72 h) is removed from the circulation much more rapidly than hCG (circulating 1/2-life 36 h) . Research showed that hCG free ß-subunit is nicked upon entering the circulation, and possibly loses its C-terminal peptide [129, 130]. As such hCG free ß-subunit had a circulating 1/2-life of just seconds, seconds before it is degraded and excreted in the kidney, or removed by the liver. With the miniscule circulating survival time, the claim that all malignancies produced hCG free ß-subunit, while it could only be detected in the serum in just 30% of cases made sense. Clearly, most of the hCG free ß-subunit produced by cancers was cleared rapidly and was undetectable as a tumor marker.
Research into choriocarcinoma showed that this cancer produced hyperglycosylated hCG [1, 131]. It was not until the mid-2000s that it was shown that hyperglycosylated hCG was a separate and independent molecule to hCG acting on cytotrophoblast cells in pregnancy implantation, and in choriocarcinoma cells [13, 14]. As demonstrated, hyperglycosylated hCG directly promoted choriocarcinoma cytotrophoblast cell growth (in cell culture) and invasion (in Matrigel chambers). Regular hCG had no effect [13, 14]. When choriocarcinoma cells were transplanted into nude mice cancer grew rapidly. Cancer cell growth and malignancy could be totally suppressed, oncostasis, by treating the nude mice with hyperglycosylated hCG antibody [13, 14]. Clearly, hyperglycosylated hCG was the single driving signal of choriocarcinoma. It was then shown that ovarian and testicular germ cell malignancies took on choriocarcinoma-like cytotrophoblast morphology, producing high concentrations of hyperglycosylated hCG, like choriocarcinoma, and driven by hyperglycosylated hCG like choriocarcinoma cells .
While research with hyperglycosylated hCG and choriocarcinoma was ongoing in the USA, research in Europe was continuing to investigate hCG free ß-subunit and other malignancies. As found in the 1990s, the detection of hCG free ß-subunit in serum was a marker of poor prognosis of cancer . Later, it was shown that hCG free ß-subunit secreted by cancer cells directly stimulated cancer cell growth [7, 133–138]. hCG free ß-subunit blocked apoptosis in cancer cells and enhanced growth and malignancy [7, 133–138]. In 2000, Stephen Butler PhD in Europe showed that hCG free ß-subunit produced by bladder cancer cells bound and antagonized a TGFß receptor on cancer cells .
Recently, I examined hyperglycosylated hCG and 2 choriocarcinoma cell lines, and hCG free ß-subunit and 2 bladder cancer lines and 2 endometrial cancer cell lines . I confirmed, hyperglycosylated hCG promoted growth of both choriocarcinoma cell lines and hCG free ß-subunit promoted growth of both bladder and endometrial cancer cell lines . Intriguingly, they were interchangeable and could take each other's roles, hyperglycosylated hCG could promote bladder and endometrial cancer, and hCG free ß-subunit could promote choriocarcinoma . It was rapidly inferred that both antagonize a TGFß receptor making them interchangeable.
This research seemingly tied together our knowledge regarding hCG and cancer, interlinking the general cancer stories of Europe and the choriocarcinoma amd germ cell cancer stories of the USA. The story of hCG and cancer was very much enhanced and confirmed by ongoing clinical trials with hCG vaccines and advanced malignancies. Three companies, Celldex, CG Therapeutics and MCI BioPharma Inc. started in 2000 testing a synthetic hCGß vaccine in treating advanced cancer cases [139–144]. Results were very exciting, with the finding that hCGß vaccines are considerably extending lives of advanced cancer patients. For example, examining the clinical trial with hCGß vaccine and colorectal cancers , the average survival of those with optimal antibody response was 45 weeks, compared to just 24 weeks in those without optimal response (p = 0.0003). This demonstrated that hCG antibodies could potentially double longevity. Similar results have been reported with prostate cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer.
The second type of cancer was seeming represented by all other human malignancies, include lung cancer, breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma and so on. These cancers start out as transformed cell driven by an hCG-independent process. As the cancer progresses and becomes advanced it is able to express the hCG ß-subunit gene and make hCG free ß-subunit. The hCG free ß-subunit driven TGFß antagonism mechanism (proposed mechanism, Figure 6) takes over control of the cancer, as indicated by the vaccine studies, and has complete control of the advanced disease. Based on the vaccine studies, development of a human high affinity hCG ß-subunit antibody may be a future answer to human cancer treatment. Vaccine only works in people with a good functioning immune system. This is where hCG ß-subunit antibody may shine. I believe that hCG ß-subunit antibody based on nude mouse experiments [13, 14], could someday cure Type 1 cancers, and could seemingly offers greatly improved treatment and improved longevity to all Type 2 malignancies.
hCG is a wonder of today's science. It firstly is extreme molecule, including features such as the most acidic molecule, the most glycosylated molecule and the longest circulating half life. It secondly is unique with multiple variants of hCG having independent functions, and hCG variants binding 2 separate receptors, hLG/LH receptor and TGFß receptor. hCG needs to be considered as a placental hormone and autocrine, a pituitary hormone and a major cancer promoter.
Laurence A. Cole PhD, The Howard and Friedman Distinguished Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, USA hCG Reference Service, 2412 Calle De Panza NW, Albuquerque NM 87104, Phone: 505-263-9635, E-mail: email@example.com.
- Elliott MM, Kardana A, Lustbader JW, Cole LA: Carbohydrate and Peptide structure of the α- and ß-subunits of human chorionic gonadotropin from normal and aberrant pregnancy and choriocarcinoma. Endocrine. 1997, 7: 15-32. 10.1007/BF02778058.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laub M, Jennissen HP: Identification of the anthelix motif in the TGF-ß superfamily by molecular 3D-Rapid Prototyping. Materialwiss Werkst. 2003, 34: 1113-1119. 10.1002/mawe.200300715.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lehnert SA, Akhurst RA: Embryonic expression pattern of TGF beta type-1 RNA suggests both paracrine and autocrine mechanisms of action. Development. 1988, 104: 263-273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lapthorn AJ, Harris DC, Littlejohn A, Lustbader JW, Canfield RE, Machin KJ: Crystal structure of hCG. Nature. 1994, 369: 455-461. 10.1038/369455a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Birken S, Maydelman Y, Gawinowicz MA, Pound A, Liu Y, Hartree AS: Isolation and characterization of human pituitary chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology. 1996, 137: 1402-1411. 10.1210/en.137.4.1402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmitt EJ, Barros CM, Fields PA, Fields MJ, Diaz T, Kluge JM, Thatcher WW: A cellular and endocrine characterization of the original and induced corpus luteum after administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or human chorionic gonadotropin on day five of the estrous cycle. J Anim Sci. 1996, 74: 1915-1929.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Butler SA, Ikram MS, Mathieu S, Iles RK: The increase in bladder carcinoma cell population induced by the free beta subunit of hCG is a result of an anti-apoptosis effect and not cell proliferation. Br J Cancer. 2000, 82: 1553-1556.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Butler SA: Hyperglycosylated hCG, hCGß and Hyperglycosylated hCGß: Interchangeable Cancer Promoters. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011Google Scholar
- Aschner B: Ueber die function der hypophyse. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol. 1912, 146: 1-147. 10.1007/BF01681114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirose T: Experimentalle histologische studie zur genese corpus luteum. Mitt Med Fakultd Univ ZU. 1919, 23: 63-70.Google Scholar
- Aschheim S, Zondek B: Das Hormon des hypophysenvorderlappens. testobjekt zum Nachweis des hormons. Klin Wochenschr. 1927, 6: 248-252. 10.1007/BF01710709.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friedman MH, Lapham ME: A simple, rapid procedure for the laboratory diagnosis of early pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1931, 21: 405-410.Google Scholar
- Cole LA, Dai D, Butler SA, Leslie KK, Kohorn EI: Gestational trophoblastic diseases: 1. Pathophysiology of hyperglycosylated hCG-regulated neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2006, 102: 144-149.Google Scholar
- Cole LA, Khanlian SA, Kohorn EI: Evolution of the Human Brain, Chorionic Gonadotropin and Hemochorial Implantation of the Placenta: Insights into Origins of Pregnancy Failures, Preeclampsia and Choriocarcinoma. J Reprod Med. 2008, 53: 449-557.Google Scholar
- Sasaki Y, Ladner DG, Cole LA: Hyperglycosylated hCG the source of pregnancy failures. Fertil Steril. 2008, 89: 1781-1786. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guibourdenche J, Handschuh K, Tsatsaris V, Gerbaud MC, Legul F, Muller D, Evain-Brion D, Fournier T: Hyperglycosylated hCG is a marker of early human trophoblast invasion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: E240-E244. 10.1210/jc.2010-0138.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Handschuh K, Guibourdenche J, Tsatsari V, Guesnon M, Laurendeau I, Evain-Brion D, Fournier T: Human chorionic gonadotropin produced by the invasive trophoblast but not the villous trophoblast promotes cell invasion and is down-regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-a. Endocrinology. 2007, 148: 5011-5019. 10.1210/en.2007-0286.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shi QJ, Lei ZM, Rao CV, Lin J: Novel role of human chorionic gonadotropin in differentiation of human cytotrophoblasts. Endocrinology. 1993, 132: 387-395.Google Scholar
- Berndt S, Blacher S, d'Hauterive PS, Thiry M, Tsampalas M, Cruz A, Pequeux C, Lorquet S, Munaut C, Noel A, Foidart JM: Chorionic gonadotropin stimulation of angiogenesis and pericyte recruitment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009, 94: 4567-4574. 10.1210/jc.2009-0443.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toth P, Li X, Rao CV, Lincoln SR, Sanfillipino JS, Spinnato JA, Yussman MA: Expression of functional human chorionic gonadotropin/human luteinizing hormone receptor gene in human uterine arteries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994, 79: 307-315. 10.1210/jc.79.1.307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lei ZM, Reshef E, Rao CV: The expression of human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptors in human endometrial and myometrial blood vessels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992, 75: 651-659. 10.1210/jc.75.2.651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zygmunt M, Herr F, Keller-Schoenwetter S, Kunzi-Rapp K, Munstedt K, Rao CV, Lang U, Preissner KT: Characterization of human chorionic gonadotropin as a novel angiogenic factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 87: 5290-5296. 10.1210/jc.2002-020642.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herr F, Baal N, Reisinger K, Lorenz A, McKinnon T, Preissner KT, Zygmunt M: hCG in the regulation of placental angiogenesis. Results of an in vitro study. Placenta. 2007, 28: (Suppl A):S85-S93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zygmunt M, Herr F, Munstedt K, Lang U, Liang OD: Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003, 110 (Suppl 1): S10-S18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toth P, Lukacs H, Gimes G, Sebestyen A, Pasztor N, Paulin F, Rao CV: Clinical importance of vascular hCG/LH receptors-A review. Reprod Biol. 2001, 1: 5-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burton GJ, Jauniaux E, Watson A: Maternal arterial connections to the placental intervillous space during the first trimester of human pregnancy: the Boyd collection revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 181: 718-724. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70518-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rao CV, Li X, Toth P, Lei ZM: Expression of epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-alpha and their common receptor genes in human umbilical cords. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995, 80: 1012-1020. 10.1210/jc.80.3.1012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rao CV, Li X, Toth P, Lei ZM, Cook VD: Novel expression of functional human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptor in human umbilical cords. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993, 77: 1706-1714. 10.1210/jc.77.6.1706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Derecka K, Stepien A, Pelliniemi L, Doboszynska T, Gawronska B, Ziecik AJ: Evidence for the presence of luteinizing hormone-chorionic gonadotrophin receptors in the pig umbilical cord. J Reprod Fertil. 1999, 117: 1-9. 10.1530/jrf.0.1170001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rao CV: Nongonadal actions of LH and hCG in reproductive biology and medicine. Semin Reprod Med. 2001, 19: 1-119.Google Scholar
- Rao CV: An overview of the past, present and future of nongonadal LH/hCG actions in reproductive biology and medicine. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 2001, 19: 7-17. 10.1055/s-2001-13906.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rao CV, Lei ZM: The past, present and future of nongonadal LH/hCG actions in reproductive biology and medicine. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007, 269: 2-8. 10.1016/j.mce.2006.07.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fiddes JC, Goodman HM: The cDNA for the ß-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin suggests evolution of a gene by readthrough into the 3'-untranslated region. Nature. 1980, 286: 684-687. 10.1038/286684a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maston GA, Ruvolo M: Chorionic gonadotropin has a recent origin within primates and an evolutionary history of selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19: 320-334. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004085.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bambra CS: Purification and properties of baboon chorionic gonadotropin. J Reprod Fertil. 1987, 19: 421-430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crawford RJ, Tegear GW, Niall HD: The nucleotide sequence of baboon chorionic gonadotropin ß-subunit genes have diverged from the human. Gene. 1986, 46: 161-169. 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90400-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin RD: Relative brain size and basal metabolic rate in terrestrial vertebrates. Nature. 1981, 293: 57-60. 10.1038/293057a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gibbons A: Solving the brain's energy crisis. Science. 1998, 280: 1345-1347. 10.1126/science.280.5368.1345.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin RD: Scaling of the mammalian barrier: the maternal energy hypothesis. News Physiol Sci. 1996, 4: 149-154.Google Scholar
- Cunnane SC, Herbige LS, Crawford MA: The importance of energy and nutrient supply in human brain evolution. Nutr Health. 1993, 9: 19-35.Google Scholar
- Martin RD: Human reproduction: a comparative background for medical hypotheses. J Reprod Immunol. 2003, 59: 111-135. 10.1016/S0165-0378(03)00042-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pjenenborg R: The placental bed. Hypertens Pregnancy. 1996, 15: 7-23. 10.3109/10641959609015685.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lockett WP: Comparative development and evolution of the placenta in primates. Contrib Primatol. 1974, 3: 42-234.Google Scholar
- Cole LA: hCG 5 independent molecules. Clin Chim Acta. 2012, 413: 48-65. 10.1016/j.cca.2011.09.037.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kovalevskaya G, Genbacev O, Fisher SJ, Cacere E, O'Connor JF: Trophoblast origin of hCG isoforms: cytotrophoblasts are the primary source of choriocarcinoma-like hCG. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002, 194: 147-155. 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00135-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morgan FJ, Birken S, Canfield RE: The amino acid sequence of human chorionic gonadotropin. J Biol Chem. 1975, 250: 5247-5258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, DuToit S, Higgins TN: Total hCG tests. Clin Chim Acta. 2011, 412: 2216-2222. 10.1016/j.cca.2011.08.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA: Individual Deviations in hCG Concentrations During Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 204: 349.e1-349.e7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.036.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Madsen BW: Spare receptors. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1979, 6: 713-714. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1979.tb00049.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siebers JW, Wuttke W, Engel W: hCG-binding of the rat ovary during pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol. 1977, 86: 173-179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marunaka M, Niisato N, Miyazaki H: New Concept of Spare Receptors and Effectors. J Membr Biol. 2005, 203: 31-35. 10.1007/s00232-004-0729-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han SW, Lei ZM, Rao CV: Homolgous down-regulation of luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptors by increasing the degradation of receptor transcripts in human uterine endometrial stromal cells. Biol Reprod. 1997, 57: 158-164. 10.1095/biolreprod57.1.158.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rao CV, Sanfillippo JS: New understanding of the biochemistry of implantation. Potential direct roles of luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology. 1997, 7: 107-111. 10.1097/00019616-199707020-00007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jauniaux E, Bao S, Eblen A, Li X, Liu ZM, Meuris S, Rao ChV: hCG concentration and receptor gene expression in placenta tissue from trisomy 18 and 21. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000, 6: 5-10. 10.1093/molehr/6.1.5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zondek B, Aschein S: The Zondek-Ashein pregnancy test. Can Med Assoc J. 1930, 22: 251-253.Google Scholar
- Wide L, Gemzell CA: An immunological pregnancy test. Acta Endocrinol. 1960, 35: 261-267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aono T, Goldstein DP, Taymor ML, Dolch K: A radioimmunoassay method for human pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) using 125I-labelled LH. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967, 98: 996-1001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vaitukaitis JL, Braunstein GD, Ross GT: A radioimmunoassay which specifically measures human chorionic gonadotropin in the presence of human luteinizing hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972, 113: 751-758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong EG, Ehrlich PH, Birken S, Schlatterer JP, Siris E, Hembree WE, Canfield RE: Use of a highly specific immunoradiometric assay for detection of human chorionic gonadotropin in urine of normal, nonpregnant or pregnant individual. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984, 59: 867-874. 10.1210/jcem-59-5-867.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vankrieken L, Hertogh RE: Rapid automated quantification of total human chorionic gonadotropin in serum by a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. Clin Chem. 1995, 41: 36-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cronier L, Bastide B, Herve JC, Deleze J, Malassine A: Gap junctional communication during human trophoblast differentiation: influence of human chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology. 1994, 135: 402-408. 10.1210/en.135.1.402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akoum A, Metz CN, Morin M: Marked increase in macrophage migration inhibitory factor synthesis and secretion in human endometrial cells in response to human chorionic gonadotropin hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90: 2904-2910. 10.1210/jc.2004-1900.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsuura T, Sugimura M, Iwaki T, Ohashi R, Kanayama N, Nishihira J: Anti-macrophage inhibitory factor antibody inhibits PMSG-hCG-induced follicular growth and ovulation in mice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002, 19: 591-595. 10.1023/A:1021219317155.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wan H, Marjan A, Cheung VW, Leenen PJM, Khan NA, Benner R, Kiekens RCM: Chorionic gonadotropin can enhance innate immunity by stimulating macrophage function. J Leukoc Biol. 2007, 82: 926-933. 10.1189/jlb.0207092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kamada M, Ino H, Naka O, Irahara M, Daitoh T, Mori K, Maeda N, Maegawa M, Hirano K, Aono T: Immunosuppressive 30-kDa protein in urine of pregnant women and patients with trophoblastic diseases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993, 50: 219-225. 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90204-P.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noonan FP, Halliday WJ, Morton H, Clunie GJA: Early pregnancy factor is immunosuppressive. Nature. 1879, 278: 649-651.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Majumdar S, Bapna BC, Mapa MK, Gupta AN, Devi PK, Subrahmanyam D: Pregnancy specific proteins: suppression of in vitro blastogenic response to mitogen by these proteins. Int J Fertil. 1982, 27: 66-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reshef E, Lei ZM, Rao CV, Pridham DD, Chegini N, Luborsky JL: The presence of gonadotropin receptors in nonpregnant human uterus, human placenta, fetal membranes, and decidua. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990, 70: 421-430. 10.1210/jcem-70-2-421.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zuo J, Lei ZM, Rao CV: Human myometrial chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptors in preterm and term deliveries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994, 79: 907-911. 10.1210/jc.79.3.907.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eta E, Ambrus G, Rao V: Direct regulation of human myometrial contractions by human chorionic gonadotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994, 79: 1582-1586. 10.1210/jc.79.6.1582.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doheny HC, Houlihan DD, Ravikumar N, Smith TJ, Morrison JJ: Human chorionic gonadotrophin relaxation of human pregnant myometrium and activation of the BKCa channel. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 88: 4310-4315. 10.1210/jc.2003-030221.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edelstam G, Karlsson C, Westgren M, Löwbeer C, Swahn ML: Human chorionic gonadatropin (hCG) during third trimester pregnancy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2007, 67: 519-525. 10.1080/00365510601187765.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldsmith PC, McGregor WG, Raymoure WJ, Kuhn RW, Jaffe RB: Cellular localization of chorionic gonadotropin in human fetal kidney and liver. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983, 57: 54-61.Google Scholar
- Abdallah MA, Lei ZM, Li X, Greenwold N, Nakajima ST, Jauniaux E, Rao CV: Human Fetal nongonadal tissues contain human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 952-956. 10.1210/jc.2003-030917.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rao CV: Chapter 11: Paradigm shift on the targets of hCG actions. In: Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Edited by: Cole LA. 2010, Elsevier, Oxford UKGoogle Scholar
- McGregor WG, Raymoure WJ, Kuhn RW, Jaffe RB: Fetal tissues can synthesize a placental hormone. Evidence for chorionic gonadotropin ß-subunit synthesis by human fetal kidney. J Clin Invest. 1981, 68: 306-309. 10.1172/JCI110249.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohlsson R, Larsson E, Nilsson O, Wahlstrom T, Sundstrom P: Blastocyst implantation precedes induction of insulin-like growth factor II gene expression in human trophoblasts. Development. 1989, 106: 555-559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- d'Hauterivea SP, Berndtb BS, Tsampalasa M, Charlet-Renarda C, Duboisb M, Bourgainc C, Hazoutd A, Foidartb J-B, Geenena V: Dialogue between Blastocyst hCG and Endometrial hCG/LH Receptor: Which Role in Implantation?. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007, 64: 156-160. 10.1159/000101740.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joshi NJ, Nandedkar TD: Effects of intrauterine instillation of antiserum to hCG during early pregnancy in mice. Acta Endocrinol. 1984, 107: 268-274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srisuparp S, Strakova Z, Fazleabas AT: The Role of Chorionic Gonadotropin (CG) in Blastocyst Implantation. Arch Med Res. 2001, 32: 627-634. 10.1016/S0188-4409(01)00330-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eblan A, Bao S, Lei ZM, Nakajima ST, Rao CV: The presence of functional luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in human sperm. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 2643-2648. 10.1210/jc.86.6.2643.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsampalasa M, Grideleta V, Berndt S, Foidart J-M, Geenena V, d'Hauterive SP: Human chorionic gonadotropin: A hormone with immunological and angiogenic properties. J Reprod Immunol. 2010Google Scholar
- d'Hauterive SP: Implantation: the first maternal-embryo crosstalk. [http://hdl.handle.net/2268/28418]
- Licht P, Russu V, Wildt L: On the role of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the embryo-endometrial microenvironment: implications for differentiation and implantation. Semin Reprod Med. 2001, 19: 37-47. 10.1055/s-2001-13909.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lei ZM, Toth P, Rao CV, Pridham D: Novel coexpression of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)/human luteinizing hormone receptors and their ligand hCG in human fallopian tubes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993, 77: 863-872. 10.1210/jc.77.3.863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rao CV: Physiological and pathological relevance of human uterine hCG/LH receptors. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006, 13: 77-78. 10.1016/j.jsgi.2005.12.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA: hCG and Hyperglycosylated hCG, Promoters of Villous Placenta and Hemochorial Placentation. Placenta: Functions, Development and Disease. 2012, Nova PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Strott CA, Yoshimi T, Ross GT, Lipsett MB: Ovarian physiology: relationship between plasma LH and steroidogenesis by the follicle and corpus luteum; effect of hCG. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1969, 29: 1157-1167. 10.1210/jcem-29-9-1157.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schumacher A, Brachwitz N, Sohr S, Engeland K, Langwisch S, Dolaptchieva M, Alexander T, Taran A, Malfertheiner SF, Costa S-D, Zimmermann G, Nitschke C, Volk HD, Alexander H, Gunzer M, Zenclussen AC: Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Attracts Regulatory T Cells into the Fetal-Maternal Interface during Early Human Pregnancy. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 5488-5497. 10.4049/jimmunol.0803177.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lei ZM, Rao CV, Kornyei J, Licht P, Hiatt ES: Novel expression of human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptor gene in brain. Endocrinology. 1993, 132: 262-270.Google Scholar
- Rao CV: Immunocytochemical localization of gonadotropin and gonadal steroid receptors in human pineal glands. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997, 82: 2756-2757. 10.1210/jc.82.8.2756.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Khanlian SA, Sutton JM, Davies S, Stephens N: Hyperglycosylated hCG (Invasive Trophoblast Antigen, ITA) a Key Antigen for Early Pregnancy Detection. Clin Biochem. 2003, 36: 647-655. 10.1016/S0009-9120(03)00108-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamade AL, Nakabayashi K, Sato A, Kiyoshi K, Takamatsu Y, Laoag-Fernandez JB, Ohara N, Maruo T: Transfection of antisense chorionic gonadotropin beta gene into choriocarcinoma cells suppresses the cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90: 4873-4879. 10.1210/jc.2004-2458.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murphy G, Reynolds JJ, Whitham SE, Docherty AJ, Angel P, Heath JK: Transforming growth factor beta modulates the expression of collagenase and metalloproteinase inhibitor. Eur Mol Biol Org J. 1987, 6: 1899-1904.Google Scholar
- Qureshi HY, Sylvester J, El Mabrouk M, Zafarullah M: TGF-beta-induced expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 gene in chondrocytes is mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway and Sp1 transcription factor. J Cell Physiol. 2005, 203: 345-352. 10.1002/jcp.20228.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD: Risk factors for early pregnancy loss. Epidemiology. 1990, 1: 382-385. 10.1097/00001648-199009000-00008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Semprini AE, Simoni G: Not so efficient reproduction. Lancet. 2000, 356: 257-258.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Norwitz ER, Schust DJ, Fisher SJ: Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2001, 345: 1400-1408. 10.1056/NEJMra000763.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA: Pregnancy failures. J Reprod Immunol. 2011Google Scholar
- O'Connor JF, Ellish N, Kakuma T, Schlatterer J, Kovalevskaya G: Differential urinary gonadotrophin profiles in early pregnancy and early pregnancy loss. Prenat Diagn. 1998, 18: 1232-1240. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199812)18:12<1232::AID-PD439>3.0.CO;2-Z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Shahabi S, Oz UA, Bahado-Singh RO, Mahoney MJ: Hyperglycosylated hCG (Invasive Trophoblast Antigen) Immunoassay: a New Basis for Gestational Down Syndrome Screening. Clin Chem. 1999, 45: 2109-2119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinans JN, Butler SA, Mantingh A, Cole LA: Urinary hyperglycosylated hCG in first-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 2000, 20: 976-978. 10.1002/1097-0223(200012)20:12<976::AID-PD962>3.0.CO;2-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bahado-Singh RO, Oz AU, Kingston JM, Shahabi S, Hsu CD, Cole LA: The role of hyperglycosylated hCG in trophoblast invasion and the prediction of subsequent pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2002, 22: 478-481. 10.1002/pd.329.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Ladner DG, Cole LA, Gutierrez JM: Production of hCG during the menstrual cycle. J Reprod Med. 2009, 54: 245-250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA: "Background" human chorionic gonadotropin in healthy, nonpregnant women. Clin Chem. 2005, 51: 1765-1766. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.056507.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Laidler L, Muller C: USA hCG Reference Service, 10 year report. Clin Biochem. 2010, 43: 1013-1022. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.05.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snyder JA, Haymond S, Parvin CA, Gronowski AM, Grenache DG: Diagnostic considerations in the measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin in aging women. Clin Chem. 2005, 51: 1830-1835. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.053595.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gronowowski AM, Fantz CR, Parvin CA, Sokoll LJ, Wiley CL, Wener MH, Grenache DG: Use of serum FSH to identify perimenopausal women with pituitary hCG. Clin Chem. 2008, 54: 652-656. 10.1373/clinchem.2007.100305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Hartle RJ, Laferla JJ, Ruddon RW: Detection of the free ß subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin in cultures of normal and malignant trophoblast cells, pregnancy sera, and sera of patients with choriocarcinoma. Endocrinology. 1983, 113: 1176-1178. 10.1210/endo-113-3-1176.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cosgrove DE, Campain JA, Cox GS: Chorionic gonadotropin synthesis by human tumor cell lines: Examination of subunit accumulation steady-state levels of mRNA and gene structure. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989, 1007: 44-54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcillac I, Cottu P, Theodore C, Lacombe MJ, Bellet D, Droz JP: Free hCG beta subunit as tumour marker in urothelial cancer. Lancet. 1993, 341: 1354-1355.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA: ß-core fragment (ß-core UGP or UGF). Tumor Marker Upd. 1994, 6: 69-75.Google Scholar
- Gillott DJ, lles RK, Chard T: The effects of ß-human chorionic gonadotrophin on the in vitro growth of bladder cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer. 1996, 73: 323-326. 10.1038/bjc.1996.56.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iles RK: Human chorionic gonadotrophin and its fragments as markers of prognosis in bladder cancer. Tumor Marker Update. 1995, 7: 161-166.Google Scholar
- Schwartz PE, Chambers JT, Taylor KJ, Cole LA, Makuch R: Urinary gonadotropin fragments. Anticancer Res. 1993, 13: 1722-1725.Google Scholar
- Muller C, Cole LA: The Quagmire of hCG and hCG Testing in Gynecologic Oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2009, 112: 663-672. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosen SW, Calvert I, Weintraub BD, Tseng JS, Rabson AS: Stimulation of N6O2'-dibutyryl cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate of ectopic production of the free beta subunit of chorionic gonadotropin by a human brain tumor cell line. Cancer Res. 1980, 40: 4325-4328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cook AM, Huddart RA, Jay G, Norman A, Dearnaley DP, Horwich A: The utility of tumour markers in assessing the response to chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer. Br J Cancer. 2000, 82: 1952-1957.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Tanaka A, Kim GS, Park SY, Koh MW, Schwartz PE, Chambers JT, Nam JH: Beta-Core Fragment (beta-Core/UGF/UGP), a Tumor Marker: A 7-Year Report. Gynecol Oncol. 1996, 60: 264-270. 10.1006/gyno.1996.0036.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Acevedo HF, Tong JY, Hartsock RJ: Human chorionic gonadotropin-beta subunit gene statement in cultured human fetal and cancer cells of different types and origins. Cancer. 1995, 76: 1467-1475. 10.1002/1097-0142(19951015)76:8<1467::AID-CNCR2820760826>3.0.CO;2-A.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishimura R, Baba S, Hasegawa K, Kinugasa M, Okamura M, Kimura A, Ohtsu F, Takeuchi K: Characterization of immunoreactive hCG beta-subunit in cultured fluids of the cell lines derived from gynecologic malignant tumor. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1990, 42: 1471-1476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bepler G, Jaques G, Oie HK, Gazdar AF: Human chorionic gonadotropin and related glycoprotein hormones in lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 1991, 58: 145-150. 10.1016/0304-3835(91)90037-I.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozturk M, Bellet D, Isselbacher KJ, Wands J: Ectopic beta-human chorionic gonadotropin production by a human hepatoma cell line (FOCUS): isolation and immunochemical characterization. Endocrinology. 1987, 120: 559-566. 10.1210/endo-120-2-559.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Udagawa Y, Nozawa S, Chin K, Sakayori M, Mikami M, Ohta K, Tsukazaki K: Biological properties of two newly established cell lines (SKG- 3a, 3b) from a human uterine cervical epidermoid carcinoma. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984, 36: 237-246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Schwartz PE, Wong Y: Urinary gonadotropin fragments (UGF) in cancers of the female reproductive system: I Sensitivity and specificity comparison with other markers. Gynecol Oncol. 1988, 31: 82-90. 10.1016/0090-8258(88)90273-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Acevedo HF, Krichevsky A, Campbell-Acevedo EA, Galyon JC, Buffo MJ, Hartsock RJ: Flow cytometry method for the analysis of membrane-associated human chorionic gonadotropin, its subunits, and fragments on human cancer cells. Cancer. 1992, 69: 1818-1828. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7<1818::AID-CNCR2820690726>3.0.CO;2-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Regelson W: Have we found the "definitive cancer biomarker"? The diagnostic and therapeutic implications of human chorionic gonadotropin-beta statement as a key to malignancy. Cancer. 1995, 76: 1299-1301. 10.1002/1097-0142(19951015)76:8<1299::AID-CNCR2820760802>3.0.CO;2-L.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wehmann RE, Nisula BC: Metabolic and renal clearance rates of purified human chorionic gonadotropin. J Clin Invest. 1981, 68: 184-194. 10.1172/JCI110234.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Kardana A, Andrade-Gordon P, Gawinowicz MA, Morris JC, Bergert ER, O'Connor J, Birken S: The Heterogeneity of hCG: III. The occurrence, biological and immunological activities of nicked hCG. Endocrinology. 1991, 129: 1559-1567. 10.1210/endo-129-3-1559.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Kardana A, Park S-Y, Braunstein G: The deactivation of hCG by nicking and dissociation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993, 76: 704-710. 10.1210/jc.76.3.704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA: The O-linked oligosaccharides are strikingly different on pregnancy and choriocarcinoma hCG. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987, 65: 811-813. 10.1210/jcem-65-4-811.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iles RK: Human chorionic gonadotrophin and its fragments as markers of prognosis in bladder cancer. Tumor Marker Upd. 1995, 7: 161-166.Google Scholar
- Butler SA, Iles RK: Biological function of the free ß-subunit: expression and treatment target in cancer. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Edited by: Cole LA. 2010, Burlington MA: Elsevier, 153-172.Google Scholar
- Iles RK: Ectopic hCGß expression by epithelial cancer: Malignant behavior metastasis and inhibition of tumor cell apoptosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007, 260: 264-270.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole LA, Birken S, Sutphen S, Hussa RO, Pattillo RA: Absence of the COOH-terminal peptide on ectopic human chorionic gonadotropin ß-subunit (hCG-ß). Endocrinology. 1982, 110: 2198-2200. 10.1210/endo-110-6-2198.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butler SA, Iles RK: Ectopic human chorionic gonadotrophin ß secretion by epithelial tumors and human chorionic gonadotrophin ß-induced apoptosis in Karposi's sarcoma, is there a connection?. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 4666-4673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carter WB, Sekharem M, Coppola D: Human chorionic gonadotropin induces apoptosis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006, 100: S243-S244.Google Scholar
- Bellet D, Lazar V, Bleche I, Paradis V, Giovangrandi Y, Paterliru P: Malignant transformation of nontrophoblastic cells in association with the expression of chorionic gonadotropin ß genes normally transcribed in trophoblastic cells. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 516-523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Delves PJ, Iles RK, Roitt IM, Lund T: Designing a new generation of anti-hCG vaccines for cancer therapy. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007, 260: 276-281.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iversen PL, Mourich DV, Moulton HM: Monoclonal antibodies to two epitopes of ß-human chorionic gonadotropin for the treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2003, 5: 156-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moulton HM, Yoshihara PH, Mason DH, Iversen PL, Triozzi PL: Active specific immunotherapy with ß-human chorionic gonadotropin peptide vaccine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Antibody response is associated with improved survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8: 2044-2051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morse MA, Chapman R, Powderly J, Blackwell K, Keler T, Green J, Riggs R, He LZ, Ramakrishna V, Vitale L, Zhao B, Butler SA, Hobeika A, Osada T, Davis T, Clay T, Lyerly HK: Phase I study utilizing a novel antigen-presenting cell-targeted vaccine with toll-like receptor stimulation to induce immunity to self-antigens in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17: 4844-4853. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0891.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He L-Z, Ramakrishna V, Connolly JE, Wang X-T, Smith P, Jones CL, Valkova-Valchanova M, Arunakumari A, Treml JF, Goldstein J, Wallace PK, Keler T, Endres MJ: A novel human cancer vaccine elicits cellular responses to the tumor-associated antigen, human chorionic gonadotropin β. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 1920-1924. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0264.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Triozzi PL, Stevens VC: Human chorionic gonadotropin as a target for cancer vaccines. Oncol Rep. 1999, 6: 7-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.