Expression of HOXA11 in the mid-luteal endometrium from women with endometriosis-associated infertility
© Szczepańska et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 1 April 2011
Accepted: 10 January 2012
Published: 10 January 2012
A decrease in HOXA11 expression in eutopic mid-secretory endometrium has been found in women with endometriosis-associated infertility.
Using Real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) and western blotting analysis we studied the HOXA11 transcript and protein levels in mid-luteal eutopic endometrium from eighteen infertile women with minimal endometriosis, sixteen healthy fertile women and sixteen infertile women with fallopian tubal occlusion from the Polish population. We also evaluated transcript levels of DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B in these groups of women.
There were significantly lower levels of HOXA11 transcripts (p = 0.003, p = 0.041) and protein (p = 0.004, p = 0.001) in women with endometriosis as compared to fertile women and infertile women with tubal occlusion. Moreover, we found significantly higher methylation levels of the CpG region in the first exon of HOXA11 in infertile women with endometriosis compared with fertile women (p < 0.001) and infertile women with tubal occlusion (p < 0.001). We also observed significantly increased levels of DNMT3A transcript in women with endometriosis than fertile women (p = 0.044) and infertile women with tubal occlusion (p = 0.047). However, we did not observe significant differences in DNMT1 and DNMT3B transcript levels between these investigated groups of women.
We confirmed that reduced HOXA11 expression may contribute to endometriosis-associated infertility. Moreover, we found that DNA hypermethylation can be one of the possible molecular mechanisms causing a decrease in HOXA11 expression in the eutopic mid-secretory endometrium in infertile women with endometriosis.
Endometriosis is a gynecological disease that is characterized by occurrence of tissue similar to the lining of the uterus elsewhere in the body [1, 2]. Endometriosis lesions can be located in the cavity and walls of the pelvis, on the ovaries, the fallopian tubes, the rectal-vaginal septum, and other body sites [1, 2]. This disease is often accompanied by pelvic pain, inflammation and results in infertility in 30 to 50% of the affected women [3–5].
It has been suggested that endometriosis-associated infertility may be due to disorders of folliculogenesis, decreased fertilization, defective implantation, and reduced oocyte quality with low capacity of blastocyst implantation [6, 7]. Estrogen and progesterone are responsible for the regulation of numerous genes' expression during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle . In women with endometriosis, progesterone is not able to induce several genes' expression during the window of implantation as compared to women without endometriosis. This defective response to progesterone may cause hostile conditions for blastocyst implantation in women with endometriosis [9–11].
The occurrence of endometriosis can be linked to some genetic factors, immunological disorders, defective estrogen metabolism, and exposure to environmental contamination and toxins [12–15]. However, the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of subfertility in women with endometriosis is still elusive .
Endometriosis has been recognized as a disease accompanied by aberrant methylation and expression of steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2), progesterone receptor (PR-B) and HOXA10 genes in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis [16–19]. The deficient expression of HOXA10 and HOXA11 in infertile women with endometriosis and in animal models has been demonstrated [16, 20–23]. However, it is still unclear whether the observed decreased expression of the HOXA11 gene can be related to its hypermethylation in endometriosis-associated infertility. Therefore we studied the effect of DNA regulatory sequences' methylation on the HOXA11 transcript and protein levels in eighteen infertile women with minimal endometriosis, sixteen fertile women and sixteen infertile women with fallopian tubal occlusion from a Polish cohort. In these groups of women, we also evaluated transcript levels of DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B.
Patients and controls
Clinical characteristics of infertile women with minimal endometriosis, fertile women and infertile women with tubal occlusion.
Number of patients
2 (1-3) a
Duration of infertility (Years)
Stage I (n = 8)
Stage II (n = 10)
Goat polyclonal (Gp) anti-HOXA11 antibodies (Ab) (C-16, 200 μg/1.0 ml), donkey anti-goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated Ab (200 μg/0.5 ml), and anti-actin HRP-conjugated Ab (clone I-19, 200 μg/1.0 ml were provided by Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
Real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) analysis of HOXA11 and DNA methyltransferase transcript levels
Total RNA was isolated by RNeasy Protect Mini Kit Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). RNA samples were treated with DNase I from DNase Set Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) and quantified. A volume of 0.5 μg RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit and oligo-dT primers from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). The efficiency of reverse transcription was controlled by a series of RNA dilution-reverse-transcribed and comparison of RQ-PCR Ct differences for cDNA samples .
RQ-PCR was conducted in a Corbett Research Rotor-Gene 3000 thermocycler (Mortlake, Australia). Target cDNA was quantified using relative quantification method employing a calibrator. The calibrator was prepared as a cDNA mix from all patients and control samples and consecutive dilutions were used to create a standard curve as provided in Relative Quantification Manual Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany). The quantity of HOXA11, DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B transcript in each sample was standardized by human glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-actin (ACTB) transcript levels. For amplification, 60 ng cDNA solution was added to 18 μl (total 20 μl) of DyNAmo HS SYBR® Green qPCR Kit from Finnzymes (Espoo, Finland) and primers (Additional file 1, Table S1). One RNA sample of each preparation was processed without the reverse transcription (RT)-reaction to provide a negative control in subsequent PCR. The quantity of HOXA11 transcripts in each sample was standardized by GAPDH and ACTB cDNA. Each sample was determined in triplicate and the HOXA11, DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B mRNA levels were expressed as the multiplicity of these cDNA concentrations in the calibrator.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis
Tissue samples were minced in liquid nitrogen followed by lysis in RIPA buffer. Next, 30 μg of protein were resuspended in sample buffer and separated on 12% Tris-glycine gel using the SDS-PAGE system. Gel proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane, which was blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline/Tween. Immunodetection was performed with Gp anti-HOXA11 Ab (C-16, 1:500 dilution, 4.0 μg) followed by incubation with donkey anti-goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated Ab (1:3000 dilution, 1.3 μg). The membranes were then stripped and incubated with anti-β-actin HRP-conjugated Ab (clone I-19, 1:3000 dilution, 0.66 μg) to ensure equal protein loading of the lanes. Bands were revealed using ECL kit and Hyperfilm ECL Amersham (Piscataway, NJ). The quantities of western blot-detected HOXA11 and β-actin proteins were determined based on the band optical density. The band densitometry readings were normalized to β-actin loading control to calculate the HOXA11-to-β-actin optical density ratio.
Sodium bisulfite DNA sequencing of cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) rich regions of the HOXA11 gene
Genomic DNA was isolated by the salting out method , and DNA cytosine bases were converted to uracil using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit™ procedure from Zymo Research Corporation (Orange, CA). The locations of CpG island in regions I, II, and III of the HOXA11 gene (Additional file 2, Figure S1) was determined based on two online programs [29, 30].
The HOXA11 regions I, II, and III were amplified from the bisulfite-modified DNA by the three pairs of primers complementary to the bisulfite-DNA modified sequence (Additional files 1, Table S1; Additional file 2, Figure S1). PCR amplification was conducted by FastStart Taq DNA Polymerase from Roche Diagnostic GmbH (Mannheim, Germany). The PCR products were purified using Agarose Gel DNA Extraction Kit Roche (Mannheim, Germany) with subsequent cloning into pGEM-T Easy Vector System I Promega (Madison, WI) and transformation into TOPO10 E. coli strain cells. Plasmid DNA isolated from ten positive bacterial clones was used for commercial sequencing of the cloned fragment of DNA. The results of bisulphite sequencing were assessed and presented using BiQ analyzer software  and BDPC web server .
Statistical analysis was conducted by Systat Software Inc (2006). SIGMASTAT (data analysis software system) version 3.5 . Data groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney Rank Test to evaluate if there was significance (P < 0.05) between the groups.
Levels of HOXA11 transcript and protein in infertile women with endometriosis, fertile women and infertile women with tubal occlusion
HOXA11 transcript and protein levels in eutopic mid-luteal endometrium from infertile women with endometriosis, fertile women and infertile women with tubal occlusion
Mean (± SD)
Mean (± SD)
Mean (± SD)
0.125 (0.0252- 0.469)a
0.155 ± 0.118a
0.246 (0.101- 8.669)a
1.449 ± 2.608a
0.322 (0.035- 7.266)a
0.922 ± 1.710a
0.694 (0.316- 3.772)b
1.023 ± 0.873b
1.608 ± 0.889b
1.994 (0.837 - 5.859)b
1.570 ± 0.821b
DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B transcript levels in infertile women with endometriosis, fertile women and infertile women with tubal occlusion
DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B transcripts in eutopic mid-luteal endometrium from infertile women with endometriosis, fertile women and infertile women with tubal occlusion.
Mean (± SD)
Mean (± SD)
Mean (± SD)
0.015(0.075 - 0.003)
0.094 ± 0.216
0.018 ± 0.013
0.015(0.071 - 0.001)
0.026 ± 0.025
0.182(0.590 - 0.016)
0.203 ± 0.173
0.07 ± 0.052
0.042(0.508 - 0.002)
0.118 ± 0.173
0.005(0.036 - 0.001)
0.014 ± 0.014
0.016 ± 0.016
0.019(0.1 - 0.001)
0.034 ± 0.034
DNA methylation levels of HOXA11 CpG rich regions in eutopic mid-luteal endometrium from infertile women with endometriosis, fertile women and infertile women with tubal occlusion
Hoxa11 belongs to the Hox gene family, which are genes that encode transcription factors expressed throughout embryonic development . An equivalent of Hoxa11 has been found in the murine model as the Abdominal-B-type homeobox gene expressed in the limbs, kidney and stromal cells surrounding the Mullerian and Wolffian ducts . Continued expression of hox genes has also been found in the female reproductive tract [36, 37]. Mice that have either either Hoxa11 or Hoxa10 gene deletion are sterile, suggesting that these genes' products play an elementary role in endometrial growth, differentiation, receptivity, embryonic development, and female fertility [36, 37].
Previously, we reaffirmed that DNA hypermethylation can be one of the mechanisms silencing HOXA10 expression in the mid-secretory endometrium in infertile women with endometriosis . We subsequently decided to extend this study for HOXA11 in these patients.
In present study we confirmed that both HOXA11 mRNA and protein levels were significantly decreased in eutopic mid-luteal endometrium in infertile women with endometriosis as compared to fertile women. However, there were no correlations between HOXA11 transcript and protein levels to age, disease duration, and clinical characteristics of patients with endometriosis (results not shown).
HOXA10 and HOXA11 have displayed significant up-regulation in endometrial glands and stroma in humans during the mid-luteal phase at the period of implantation [39, 40]. By contrast, women with endometriosis did not demonstrate an increase in the expression of these genes throughout the window of implantation [20, 21]. The reduced expression of HOXA11 along with HOXA10 in the endometrium has been reported by Taylor et al. (1999), who suggested that this may result in infertility in patients with endometriosis . Recently, Rackow et al. (2011) demonstrated a marked decrease in HOXA11 and HOXA10 mRNA levels in women with endometrial polyps with reduced pregnancy rates .
Our bisulfite DNA sequencing of HOXA11 CpG rich region II (Additional file 2, Figure S1) showed significantly increased levels of DNA methylation in eutopic mid-secretory endometrium from infertile women with minimal endometriosis as compared to fertile women. However, we did not find DNA methylation in HOXA11 CpG rich regions I and III in the same patients. Differential methylation in these regions might be due to distinct histone modifications and/or distinct interactions of nuclear proteins and non-coding RNAs to various chromatin conformations. These events might modulate DNA methyltransferase (DNMTs) accessibility to DNA, resulting in differentially methylated gene regions .
The hypermethylation of HOXA10 DNA regulatory sequences have been well documented to date in humans, and in murine and baboon endometriosis [16, 22, 43]. However, little is know about effect of HOXA11 gene methylation on its expression in infertile women with endometriosis. Recently, it has been demonstrated that HOXA11 DNA methylation is significantly associated with residual tumors after cytoreductive surgery and is a marker independently associated with poor outcome in ovarian cancer .
In humans, three CpG islands in the HOXA11 gene were localized: the first is 2408 bp upstream of exon 1, the second is mainly in exon 1, and the third is in the intron separating exons 1 and 2. (Additional file 2, Figure S1). The methylation of mammalian genomic DNA is carried out by DNMTs . The role of some DNMTs in silencing HOXA gene transcription in eutopic endometrium in women with endometriosis has been reported . We observed markedly increased levels of DNMT3A transcript in eutopic mid-secretory endometrium from women with endometriosis compared to fertile women. Our observations were on par with Wu et al. (2007), who also found significantly higher levels of DNMT3A in eutopic endometrium from infertile women with endometriosis as compared to controls .
Endometriosis has been considered as an epigenetic disease. Hypomethylation of SF-1 and ESR2 promoters may be responsible for increased estrogen action in women with endometriosis [18, 19]. By contrast, a loss of progesterone response in women with endometriosis may be associated with hypermethylation of the PR-B promoter and a reduction in this receptor's isoform levels in endometrial tissue . Moreover, hypermethylation of HOXA10 causes its reduced expression, accompanied with some defects in blastocyst implantation in mid-luteal endometrium .
We observed that decreased HOXA11 expression was associated with hypermethylation of HOXA11 CpG rich regions in eutopic mid-secretory endometrium from infertile women with endometriosis compared to fertile women. Our findings may support a view of endometriosis as an epigenetic disease.
HOXA11 protein alone is a repressor of the decidual prolactin promoter, but combined with FOXO1A transcription factor induces transcription of decidual prolactin . Therefore, HOXA11 expression may control the proper production of decidual prolactin, which is essential for implantation and pregnancy . This may indicate that changes in HOXA11 expression in eutopic endometrium throughout the implantation window can be one of the possible molecular mechanisms of endometriosis-associated infertility in women.
This study was supported by grant No. NN407 162633 from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education. The technical assistance of Michał Łuczak is gratefully acknowledged
- Giudice LC, Kao LC: Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1789-1799. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulukus M, Cakmak H, Arici A: The role of endometrium in endometriosis. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006, 13: 467-476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Ziegler D, Borghese B, Chapron C: Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet. 2010, 376: 730-738. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60490-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Houston DE: Evidence for the risk of pelvic endometriosis by age, race and socioeconomic status. Epidemiol Rev. 1984, 6: 167-191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strathy JH, Molgaard CA, Coulam CB, Melton LJ: Endometriosis and infertility: a laparoscopic study of endometriosis among fertile and infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1982, 38: 667-672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simón C, Gutiérrez A, Vidal A, de los Santos MJ, Tarín JJ, Remohí J, Pellicer A: Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1994, 9: 725-729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tummon IS, Maclin VM, Radwanska E, Binor Z, Dmowski WP: Occult ovulatory dysfunction in women with minimal endometriosis or unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 1988, 50: 716-720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, Imani B, Yang JP, Germeyer A, Osteen K, Taylor RN, Lessey BA, Giudice LC: Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology. 2002, 143: 2119-2138. 10.1210/en.143.6.2119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burney RO, Talbi S, Hamilton AE, Vo KC, Nyegaard M, Nezhat CR, Lessey BA, Giudice LC: Gene expression analysis of endometrium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in women with endometriosis. Endocrinology. 2007, 148: 3814-3826. 10.1210/en.2006-1692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamat AA, Younes PS, Sayeeduddin M, Wheeler TM, Simpson JL, Agoulnik AI: Protein expression profiling of endometriosis: validation of 2-mm tissue microarrays. Fertil Steril. 2004, 82: 1681-1683. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kao LC, Germeyer A, Tulac S, Lobo S, Yang JP, Taylor RN, Osteen K, Lessey BA, Giudice LC: Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility. Endocrinology. 2003, 144: 2870-28781. 10.1210/en.2003-0043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gurates B, Bulun SE: Endometriosis: the ultimate hormonal disease. Semin Reprod Med. 2003, 21: 125-134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul Dmowski W, Braun DP: Immunology of endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004, 18: 245-263. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rier SE: The potential role of exposure to environmental toxicants in the pathophysiology of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 955: 201-212. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02781.x. discussion 230-2, 396-406View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barlow DH, Kennedy S: Endometriosis: new genetic approaches and therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2005, 56: 345-356. 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Halverson G, Basir Z, Strawn E, Yan P, Guo SW: Aberrant methylation at HOXA10 may be responsible for its aberrant expression in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 193: 371-380. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Strawn E, Basir Z, Halverson G, Guo SW: Promoter hypermethylation of progesterone receptor isoform B (PR-B) in endometriosis. Epigenetics. 2006, 1: 106-111. 10.4161/epi.1.2.2766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xue Q, Lin Z, Yin P, Milad MP, Cheng YH, Confino E, Reierstad S, Bulun SE: Transcriptional activation of steroidogenic factor-1 by hypomethylation of the 5' CpG island in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 92: 3261-3247. 10.1210/jc.2007-0494.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xue Q, Lin Z, Cheng YH, Huang CC, Marsh E, Yin P, Milad MP, Confino E, Reierstad S, Innes J, Bulun SE: Promoter methylation regulates estrogen receptor 2 in human endometrium and endometriosis. Biol Reprod. 2007, 77: 681-687. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.061804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borghese B, Mondon F, Noël JC, Fayt I, Mignot TM, Vaiman D, Chapron C: Gene expression profile for ectopic versus eutopic endometrium provides new insights into endometriosis oncogenic potential. Mol Endocrinol. 2008, 22: 2557-2562. 10.1210/me.2008-0322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor HS, Bagot C, Kardana A, Olive D, Arici A: HOX gene expression is altered in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14: 1328-1331. 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1328.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee B, Du H, Taylor HS: Experimental murine endometriosis induces DNA methylation and altered gene expression in eutopic endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2009, 80: 79-85. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.070391.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cakmak H, Taylor HS: Molecular mechanisms of treatment resistance in endometriosis: the role of progesterone-hox gene interactions. Semin Reprod Med. 2010, 28: 69-74. 10.1055/s-0029-1242996.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canis M, Donnez JG, Guzick DS, Halme JK, Rock JA, Schenken RS, et al: Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997, 67: 817-821. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81391-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tvarijonaviciene E, Nadisauskiene RJ: The value of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology among infertile patients. Medicina. 2008, 44: 439-448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J: Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1950, 1: 3-5.Google Scholar
- Ståhlberg A, Håkansson J, Xian X, Semb H, Kubista M: Properties of the reverse transcription reaction in mRNA quantification. Clin Chem. 2004, 50: 509-515. 10.1373/clinchem.2003.026161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16: 1215-10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- CPG Plot Search for Regions of Genomic Sequences that are Rich in the CpG pattern. [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/emboss/cpgplot/]
- TESS: Transcription Element Search System. [http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/cgi-bin/tess/tess]
- BiQ Analyzer - a software tool for DNA methylation analysis. [http://biq-analyzer.bioinf.mpi-sb.mpg.de/]
- BDPC DNA methylation analysis platform. [http://biochem.jacobs-university.de/BDPC/Compilation/manual.php]
- SYSTAT/Statistical and Graphical Software. [http://www.systat.com/]
- Krumlauf R: Mouse Hox genetic functions. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993, 3: 621-625. 10.1016/0959-437X(93)90098-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsieh-Li HM, Witte DP, Weinstein M, Branford W, Li H, Small K, Potter SS: Hoxa 11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility. Development. 1995, 121: 1373-1385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor HS, Vanden Heuvel GB, Igarashi P: A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system: late establishment and persistent adult expression of the Hoxa cluster genes. Biol Reprod. 1997, 57: 1338-1345. 10.1095/biolreprod57.6.1338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benson GV, Lim H, Paria BC, Satokata I, Dey SK, Maas RL: Mechanisms of reduced fertility in Hoxa-10 mutant mice: uterine homeosis and loss of maternal Hoxa-10 expression. Development. 1996, 122: 2687-2696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szczepańska M, Wirstlein P, Luczak M, Jagodziński PP, Skrzypczak J: Reduced expression of HOXA10 in the midluteal endometrium from infertile women with minimal endometriosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2010, 64: 697-705. 10.1016/j.biopha.2010.09.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor HS, Arici A, Olive D, Igarashi P: HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium. J Clin Invest. 1998, 101: 1379-1384.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor HS, Igarashi P, Olive DL, Arici A: Sex steroids mediate HOXA11 expression in the human peri-implantation endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999, 84: 1129-1135. 10.1210/jc.84.3.1129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rackow BW, Jorgensen E, Taylor HS: Endometrial polyps affect uterine receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.034Google Scholar
- Ikegami K, Ohgane J, Tanaka S, Yagi S, Shiota K: Interplay between DNA methylation, histone modification and chromatin remodeling in stem cells and during development. Int J Dev Biol. 2009, 53: 203-214. 10.1387/ijdb.082741ki.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim JJ, Taylor HS, Lu Z, Ladhani O, Hastings JM, Jackson KS, Wu Y, Guo SW, Fazleabas AT: Altered expression of HOXA10 in endometriosis: potential role in decidualization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007, 13: 323-332. 10.1093/molehr/gam005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiegl H, Windbichler G, Mueller-Holzner E, Goebel G, Lechner M, Jacobs IJ, Widschwendter M: HOXA11 DNA methylation--a novel prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008, 123: 725-729. 10.1002/ijc.23563.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turek-Plewa J, Jagodziński PP: The role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in the regulation of gene expression. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2005, 10: 631-647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Strawn E, Basir Z, Halverson G, Guo SW: Aberrant expression of deoxyribonucleic acid methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2007, 87: 24-32. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch VJ, Brayer K, Gellersen B, Wagner GP: HoxA-11 and FOXO1A cooperate to regulate decidual prolactin expression: towards inferring the core transcriptional regulators of decidual genes. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e6845-10.1371/journal.pone.0006845.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bao L, Tessier C, Prigent-Tessier A, Li F, Buzzio OL, Callegari EA, Horseman ND, Gibori G: Decidual prolactin silences the expression of genes detrimental to pregnancy. Endocrinology. 2007, 148: 2326-2334. 10.1210/en.2006-1643.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.