Open Access

The spatiotemporal expression of multiple coho salmon ovarian connexin genes and their hormonal regulation in vitro during oogenesis

  • Yoji Yamamoto1, 2Email author,
  • J Adam Luckenbach2,
  • Mollie A Middleton1, 2 and
  • Penny Swanson2
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology20119:52

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-9-52

Received: 29 December 2010

Accepted: 19 April 2011

Published: 19 April 2011

Abstract

Background

Throughout oogenesis, cell-cell communication via gap junctions (GJs) between oocytes and surrounding follicle cells (theca and granulosa cells), and/or amongst follicle cells is required for successful follicular development. To gain a fundamental understanding of ovarian GJs in teleosts, gene transcripts encoding GJ proteins, connexins (cx), were identified in the coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, ovary. The spatiotemporal expression of four ovarian cx transcripts was assessed, as well as their potential regulation by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1).

Methods

Salmonid ovarian transcriptomes were mined for cx genes. Four gene transcripts designated cx30.9, cx34.3, cx43.2, and cx44.9 were identified. Changes in gene expression across major stages of oogenesis were determined with real-time, quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) and cx transcripts were localized to specific ovary cell-types by in situ hybridization. Further, salmon ovarian follicles were cultured with various concentrations of FSH, LH and IGF1 and effects of each hormone on cx gene expression were determined by qPCR.

Results

Transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were highly expressed at the perinucleolus (PN)-stage and decreased thereafter. In contrast, transcripts for cx34.3 and cx43.2 were low at the PN-stage and increased during later stages of oogenesis, peaking at the mid vitellogenic (VIT)-stage and maturing (MAT)-stage, respectively. In situ hybridization revealed that transcripts for cx34.3 were only detected in granulosa cells, but other cx transcripts were detected in both oocytes and follicle cells. Transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were down-regulated by FSH and IGF1 at the lipid droplet (LD)-stage, whereas transcripts for cx34.3 were up-regulated by FSH and IGF1 at the LD-stage, and LH and IGF1 at the late VIT-stage. Transcripts for cx43.2 were down-regulated by IGF1 at the late VIT-stage and showed no response to gonadotropins.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate the presence and hormonal regulation of four different cx transcripts in the salmon ovary. Differences in the spatiotemporal expression profile and hormonal regulation of these cx transcripts likely relate to their different roles during ovarian follicle differentiation and development.

Background

The growth and development of oocytes and surrounding follicle cells (i.e., granulosa and theca cells) occurs in a highly orchestrated and mutually dependent manner. Communication between these different ovarian cell-types is dependent on direct signaling mediated by gap junctions (GJs), in addition to signaling via endocrine and/or paracrine pathways [1, 2]. Gap junctions are composed of an aggregate of intercellular membrane channels that allow the passage of molecules with a molecular weight of up to 1 kDa, including various second messengers such as cyclic AMP (cAMP) and inositol trisphosphate, and ions [3]. Each GJ channel is formed by two hemichannels (connexons), both of which are hexamers of connexin (Cx) protein subunits [4, 5]. Two connexons from adjacent cells dock to form a GJ channel. In mammals, numerous studies indicate that ovarian GJ communication is involved in regulation of the meiotic arrest of oocytes, steroidogenesis, and apoptosis [69]. In fishes, by contrast, detailed information on the distribution, expression, and functions of ovarian GJs is largely unknown.

The few studies of ovarian GJs and cx gene transcripts in fishes were performed during late stages of maturation, prior to ovulation. Final maturation of the fish ovarian follicle involves a number of events including luteinizing hormone (LH)-dependent acquisition of oocyte maturational competence (OMC), LH induction of maturation-inducing hormone (MIH; typically either 17,20β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one or 17,20β,21-trihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one) synthesis, and MIH-dependent meiotic resumption [10]. Previous studies with Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulates, and red seabream, Pagrus major, used electron microscopy to show that the number of ovarian GJs (between granulosa cells and oocytes, and amongst granulosa cells) increased during LH-dependent acquisition of OMC [1113]. Increases in ovarian GJs were also induced by insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) treatment in red seabream [12]. Further, Yamamoto et al. [14, 15] found that culturing ovarian fragments with common GJ inhibitors prevented LH-induced acquisition of OMC in ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis, suggesting that ovarian GJ communication is essential for the LH-induced acquisition of OMC in this species. Thus, some ovarian GJs appear to be hormonally regulated and to have important roles during final maturation of the follicle in fishes. However, the function(s) and regulation of ovarian GJs during earlier stages of oogenesis, such as previtellogenic and vitellogenic stages, has not been studied.

So far, 21 human genes and 20 mouse cx genes have been identified [16]. In addition, 37 putative cx genes have been identified in the zebrafish genome [17]. Many cx genes show tissue- or cell-type-specific expression patterns and most organs express more than one cx [18]. According to Eastman's phylogenetic analysis, which was performed with the entire Cx family including human, mouse, and zebrafish Cx, cx genes can be classified into α, β, and γ groups, and potentially a fourth group containing human Cx62, mouse Cx57, and zebrafish Cx52.6 for example [17]. Studies in mammals have indicated that endocrine regulators of oogenesis such as follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and LH also regulate levels of cx gene transcripts in the ovary [9]. For example, up-regulation of cx43 transcripts in response to FSH was reported in a rat granulosa cell line [19], while LH had an inhibitory effect on the expression of cx43 in rat ovarian follicles in vitro [20]. Such gonadotropic regulation of cx gene transcripts has also been reported in teleosts. In red seabream, purified native FSH increased cx32.3, while LH increased cx31.5 and cx32.3 transcripts during acquisition of OMC [21, 22]. In addition, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) elevated cx32.2, but not cx32.7 transcripts in Atlantic croaker during acquisition of OMC [2325]. Thus, gonadotropins appear to regulate some ovarian cx gene transcripts during oocyte maturation in teleosts. Meanwhile, the regulation of ovarian cx gene transcripts by FSH, LH or IGF1 at earlier stages of oogenesis has not been examined.

The goals of this study were to identify and characterize ovarian cx gene transcripts in coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, determine whether levels of cx transcripts in the ovary change across stages of oogenesis, and to determine the subfollicular distribution of cx transcripts in the ovary. Finally, we determined whether FSH, LH or IGF1 regulate cx gene expression in previtellogenic and vitellogenic ovarian follicles. We used coho salmon as a model for this work because it is a semelparous species (spawns only once in its life and then dies) that exhibits synchronous follicle development. This unique reproductive trait allows for stage-specific analysis of a relatively homogenous clutch of ovarian follicles, which is not possible in iteroparous species. Furthermore, developmental profiles of FSH, LH, and IGF1 in the plasma are well characterized in salmon [2629], giving biological relevance to any effects of these hormones on cx gene expression during a specific stage of ovarian development.

Methods

Animals and sampling

Coho salmon were reared at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center (Seattle, WA, USA) in 10-15°C recirculated fresh water and fed a standard ration (0.6-1.0% body weight/day) of a commercial diet (Skretting Feeds, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Lighting above the tanks was continually adjusted to match the natural photoperiod of Seattle (48°N). Stages of oogenesis were determined and confirmed by histological analyses using Campbell et al. [27] and Nagahama [30] as guides.

Perinucleolus (PN)-stage follicles were sampled from age-1+ salmon in August. Cortical alveolus (CA)-stage, lipid droplet (LD)-stage, early vitellogenic (VIT)-stage (with oocytes containing yolk granules), mid VIT-stage (with oocytes containing yolk globules), and preovulatory, maturing (MAT)-stage follicles were sampled from age-2+ salmon in March, June, July, August and December, respectively. The germinal vesicles of oocytes in the MAT-stage were migrating (just before germinal vesicle break down). Prior to tissue sampling, fish were euthanized in buffered tricaine methanesulfonate (0.05% MS-222, Argent Chemical, Redmond, WA) and body and ovary weight were recorded. A piece of ovary was collected for histological analysis, and other pieces were frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA isolation and mRNA analyses. Fish used in the experiments were reared and handled according to the policies and guidelines of the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol #2313-09).

RNA isolation

For the across-stage comparisons of transcript levels, approximately 40-100 mg (wet wt.) pieces of ovarian tissue were homogenized in 1 ml Tri-Reagent/sample (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) using a TissueLyser II (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) and total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Because of the large size of MAT-stage follicles (130-140 mg/follicle), 5 follicles/fish were homogenized in 7 ml of Tri-Reagent. For culture experiment 1 (see below), 40-70 mg of cultured ovarian tissue from each well was homogenized with 1 ml of Tri-Reagent. For culture experiment 2, one cultured follicle (late VIT-stage, 40-80 mg/follicle) from each well was homogenized in 1 ml of Tri-Reagent. Isolated total RNA samples were then diluted to ~250 ng RNA/ml in nuclease-free water.

Total RNA samples were then DNase treated using the Turbo DNA-Free kit's "rigorous" protocol (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX) where the amount of DNase enzyme and treatment time were doubled. RNA yields and quality were assessed by NanoDrop (ND-1000 Spectrophotometer; NanoDrop Technologies, Rockland, DE) and gel electrophoresis.

For the across-stage comparisons, mRNA was further isolated from total RNA samples to mitigate issues associated with comparing ovarian follicles during different stages of oogenesis, which may be dramatically different in size and RNA composition [31]. mRNA was isolated from 200 mg of total RNA/sample using the MicroPoly(A)Purist kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). As in vitro culture experiments were done with ovarian follicles of the same stage, total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis (see below).

cDNA synthesis

For each sample, 500 ng of total RNA (for culture experiments) or 50 ng of mRNA (for across-stage comparisons of cx transcripts) was reverse transcribed in a 10-μl reaction with the Superscript II kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Other necessary components for reverse transcription (RT), such as random primers and RNase inhibitor, were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Negative control reactions were performed without the addition of the RT enzyme for a subset of the RNA samples.

Identification of coho salmon connexins

To identify coho salmon ovarian cx gene transcripts, we conducted searches within our previous coho salmon ovarian cDNA libraries (Luckenbach et al. unpublished data) and located partial cDNAs for gene transcripts we later named cx30.9, cx34.3, and cx44.9. Partial cDNAs for cx30.9 and cx44.9 showed high homology to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, gap junction beta 6 protein (Gjb6, GenBank accession number; NM_001140280.1) and rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, cx sequences (Accession numbers: TC152456 and TC137376) in the DFCI R. trout gene index database [32], respectively. Primers to amplify the complete coding sequence (CDS) of these two cx genes were designed within these salmonid fish sequences. The complete CDS for coho salmon cx34.3 was determined by constructing a contig from several coho salmon expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and then the entire sequence was confirmed by PCR. Although we did not find cx43.2 in our salmon ovarian cDNA libraries, rainbow trout cx43 (GenBank accession number DQ204869.1), which is a homologue of coho salmon cx43.2, had been previously studied in the trout ovary [33]. Thus, we cloned cx43.2 from the coho salmon ovary using primers designed from the trout cDNA sequence.

The primers for cloning each salmon cx are shown in Table 1. The RT-PCRs for cloning were carried out for 35 cycles as follows: 94°C for 30 s for denaturing, 52°C for 30 s for annealing and 72°C for 90 s for extension. The RT-PCR reactions consisted of 18 ng cDNA template (based on the mRNA loaded into the RT reactions), which was synthesized using mRNA of MAT-stage ovary. We used SuperTaq™ Polymerase (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The resultant PCR products of expected size were inserted into a pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) or pCR®-XL-TOPO® vector (Invitrogen), and completely sequenced on both DNA strands with an ABI PRISM 3100-Avant Genetic Analyzer.
Table 1

List of primers used for cloning and quantitative RT-PCR.

Step

Gene name

Strand

Sequence

Product size (bp)

cloning

cx30.9

Sense

5'-GAAATTCCGAGGAGGTGGTC-3'

1,088

  

Antisense

5'-GCATGTTTGTCCAGGACTAC-3'

 

cloning

cx34.3

Sense

5'-CTGAGAGACTGAGAGCTCCAAAC-3'

1,038

  

Antisense

5'-AGACTGGCATGCGAATCATTG-3'

 

cloning

cx43.2

Sense

5'-TCAAGAAGTGACGGAGAAAG-3'

1,278

  

Antisense

5'-GTACTCTCTGTTCTCTGGCA-3'

 

cloning

cx44.9

Sense

5'-AGCCTTAAAGAGCTGAGAGG-3'

1,273

  

Antisense

5'-CGAGCAGGCATTAAGCAGGA-3'

 

qPCR*

cx30.9

Antisense

5'-GGCTGGTGGAGTGTTTGTTC-3'

99

qPCR

cx34.3

Sense

5'-ACTACCTGTATGGCTTCACCCT-3'

284

  

Antisense

5'-CTGGATCATCTGGTCTTTGTTC-3'

 

qPCR

cx43.2

Sense

5'-ATGGCTGTTCCTCTCCCACT-3'

121

  

Antisense

5'-CAGTTTTGCTCGTTGGCTTG-3'

 

qPCR

cx44.9

Sense

5'-GTGACAGAAGGCTCTGTGAAG-3'

305

  

Antisense

5'-ACACCGAGATGGAGAATCTC-3'

 

*qPCR for cx30.9 was performed using cx30.9 cloning primer with the antisense qPCR primer for cx30.9.

Quantitative PCR

For cx gene transcript analyses, we performed real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR). The qPCR procedure was similar to that previously reported by Luckenbach et al [31, 34]. The sequences of gene-specific primers (GSP) for qPCR are listed in Table 1. Reactions consisted of 1×Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (ABI), 150 nM of each gene-specific forward and reverse primer and 0.05 ng (based on the mRNA loaded into the RT reactions, for the across-stage comparisons of cx transcripts) or 0.5 ng (based on the total RNA loaded into the RT reactions, for culture experiment 1 and 2) of cDNA templates. Triplicate standard curve samples generated from a serial dilution of pooled mRNA from ovaries of six randomly selected previtellogenic coho salmon (for the across-stage comparisons of cx transcripts), or pooled total RNA from six randomly selected ovaries after being cultured 36 h with hormones (for culture experiment 1 and 2) were included in each plate. Results were analyzed using the relative standard curve method according to the manufacturer's instructions. Negative controls were included in each plate and consisted of either no RNA template (no template control, NTC) or RNA template that was not reverse transcribed (no amplification control, NAC). NACs reveal possible genomic DNA contamination in the RNA preparations. Negative control samples showed either no detectability or negligible values (>10 cycle separation from experimental samples). A melt curve analysis was included for each target gene to ensure that a single product was amplified, and in addition, a qPCR product was sequenced to verify that the target was successfully amplified.

Previous work in coho salmon showed that normalization of qPCR data to elongation factor-1 alpha (ef1a) generated results that best reflected transcript abundance on a per follicle basis in coho salmon follicle when comparing across different stages of oogenesis [31]. Therefore expression data for the cx transcripts were normalized to ef1a in this study. The levels of ef1a transcripts were stable (i.e., not significantly different) for the in vitro experiments and across four of the five stages (PN- to VIT-stage) of oogenesis included in the across-stage comparison (see Figure 2A inset). Due to the observed increase in ef1a at the MAT-stage, data for the cx genes were assessed both normalized to ef1a and un-normalized. Results overall for the two approaches were statistically very similar and therefore ef1a normalized data are shown for the cx transcripts. The primers for ef1a were the same as previously reported [31].

In situ hybridization

Transcripts for all four cx gene transcripts were localized by in situ hybridization (ISH) in PN-, CA-, LD-, early VIT- and MAT-stage ovarian follicles. However, ISH was technically difficult to perform with MAT-stage follicles due to the large amount of yolk present in the oocytes, and results are therefore not shown for this stage.

The cDNA fragments containing the entire CDS -- that is, nucleotides 1- 1,088, 1-1,038, 1-1,278, and 1-1,273 for cx30.9, cx34.3, cx43.2, and cx44.9, respectively -- were used as templates for the synthesis of RNA probes. Sense and antisense RNA probes for each cx were transcribed in vitro using digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and T7 RNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). To prepare tissues for ISH, ovarian samples were fragmented into several pieces and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) with gentle shaking at room temperature for 16-36 h. Fixed ovaries were rinsed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) over 45 min, sequentially dehydrated through a methanol series (25%, 50%, and 75% methanol/PBS), and stored in 100% methanol at - 20°C until use.

A portion of each sample was embedded in paraffin wax and cut into 5-μm serial sections using a microtome. Paraffin sections were mounted on SUPERFROST® Plus microscope slides (Thermo Scientific, Portsmouth, NH), dewaxed, and dehydrated by immersion in a xylene-ethanol series. Slides were either stained with hematoxylin and eosin (VECTOR LABORATORIES, Burlingame, CA) or processed for ISH with DIG-labeled RNA probes. Sections for ISH were permeabilized, post-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min, and treated with 5 mg/ml proteinase K at 37°C for 10 min. The sections were subsequently acetylated, and then incubated with a hybridization mixture of 0.0125-0.2 mg/ml RNA probe, 50% formamide, 2× saline-sodium citrate (SSC) (pH 4.5), 50 mg/ml transfer RNA (tRNA), 50 mg/ml heparin, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 10% dextran sulfate. After hybridization at 65°C for 16 h, the sections were washed as follows: twice in 5× SSC/50% formamide at 65°C for 30 min, three times in 2× SSC/50% formamide at 65°C for 30 min, and once in 1× SSC/25% formamide:1× Tris buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) at room temperature for 30 min. Unbound probes were digested using 20 mg/ml RNase A to reduce background signals. After RNase digestion at 37°C for 30 min, the sections were placed in NTE buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid) at 37°C for 5 min before being washed three times in 0.5× SSC at 65°C for 20 min, three times in 1× TBST at room temperature for 5 min, and in blocking solution (1×TBST and 2% Blocking Reagent; Roche Diagnostics) at room temperature for 1 h. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with the Fab fragment of an anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (Roche Diagnostics) diluted 1:2000 with blocking solution at 8°C for 16 h. Finally, each section was rinsed three times in TBST containing 1 mM Levamisole (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 5 min. The sections were then incubated in a NTMT solution (100 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 9.5, 50 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween 20, 1 mM Levamisole) containing 0.0035% nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT; Roche Diagnostics) and 0.0018% 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP; Roche Diagnostics) at room temperature in the dark. After the color reaction had occurred, the slides were sealed with CYTOSEAL™ XYL (Thermo Scientific).

Ovarian cultures

Culture experiments were conducted as described previously [34, 35] to assess the effects of various hormones on ovarian cx gene expression. Animals were anaesthetized as above and the ovaries were removed, weighed, and held in chilled Leibovitz L-15 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) prior to dissection of follicles. Highly-purified coho salmon FSH and LH used in the experiments were obtained according to Swanson et al. [36]. Human recombinant IGF1 was purchased from Bachem (Torrance, CA). All hormones were solubilized in 20 mM phosphate buffered saline supplemented with 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA, RIA grade; Sigma-Aldrich) and then dissolved directly in the culture medium. Ovarian tissue fragments from a fish were distributed into 24-well polystyrene culture plates so that each treatment received one tissue fragment from each of the fish. Each treatment therefore included ovarian follicles from 6 different fish. Culture wells contained 1 ml of L-15 medium supplemented with 0.2% BSA and tissues were pre-incubated at 14°C for 2 h with gentle orbital shaking at 100 rpm. After the pre-incubation, the medium was removed and replaced with fresh L-15 medium containing either no hormone or hormone as described below. Time 0 h ovaries (initial) were collected and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen just after the pre-incubation for later RNA isolation.

Culture experiment 1; FSH and IGF1 effects on ovarian cx genes

This experiment was conducted in mid-June 2010 with LD-stage ovaries, because previous studies with coho salmon showed that levels of plasma FSH begin to increase in early spring (generally, Feb-May) and reach peak levels in late summer (Aug-Sept) [26]. The mean fish body weight (± SEM) was 595.9 ± 29.0 g, fork length was 36.2 ± 0.7 cm, paired ovary weight was 6.42 ± 0.62 g, and gonadosomatic index (GSI; gonad weight/body weight*100) was 1.07 ± 0.06%. Approximately 40-70 mg of ovarian tissue/well was incubated with or without hormones. FSH concentrations were 0 (control), 10, 50, 100, or 500 ng/ml and IGF1 concentrations were 0 (control), 1, 10, or 100 nM. Cultures were maintained for 36 h based on results of a previous time course study [34], which demonstrated that several ovarian genes affected by FSH showed a difference from controls at this time point. After the experiment, ovarian tissues were dabbed on lens paper to remove excess liquid, weighed, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for later RNA isolation.

Culture experiment 2; LH and IGF1 effects on ovarian cx genes

This experiment was conducted in early October 2010 with late VIT-stage ovaries, because previous studies with coho salmon showed that plasma LH levels begin to increase slightly in fall (generally Oct/Nov in our hatchery), prior to the ovulatory surge [26]. The mean fish body weight (± SEM) was 1152.8 ± 90.9 g, fork length was 44.0 ± 0.6 cm, paired ovary weight was 110.3 ± 20.3 g, and GSI was 9.1 ± 1.1%. Because of the large size of late VIT-stage follicles (40-80 mg/follicle), three follicles/well were cultured with or without hormones for 36 h. The LH concentrations were 0 (control), 10, 50, 100, or 500 ng/ml and IGF1 concentrations were the same as in experiment 1.

Measurement of medium E2 levels

In salmon, both gonadotropins have been shown to stimulate production of estradiol-17β (E2) by ovarian follicles in vitro [34, 37] and E2 had a biphasic effect on transcripts for ovarian cx genes in Atlantic croaker [25]. Furthermore, IGF1 can modulate aromatase activity [38]. Thus, it is informative to know how these hormones affected ovarian E2 production, which in turn may have influenced cx gene expression. After the 36-h cultures, the medium from each well was collected and stored at -80°C until later E2 measurement. Samples were heat treated at 80°C for 1 h, centrifuged at 15,700 × g for 7 min, and supernatants were transferred to a fresh tube [34]. Medium E2 levels were then determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) as previously described [39].

Statistical analysis

The across-stage cx gene expression data and in vitro ovarian incubation data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey multiple mean comparison tests. Data were log10 transformed when necessary to meet normality and equal variance assumptions and reported as means ± SEM. Results for initial and control samples from the ovarian incubation experiments were compared by unpaired t-tests. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS 11.0 microcomputer software package (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

Results

Isolation and characterization of coho salmon cx cDNAs

cDNAs encoding 4 salmon cx genes were obtained with GSPs (Table 1). The cx30.9 cDNA (GenBank Accession No. HQ315553) was 1,088 bp and 272 aa, cx34.3 (HQ315554) was 1,038 bp and 298 aa, cx43.2 (HQ315555) was 1,278 bp and 383 aa, and cx44.9 (HQ315556) was 1,273 bp and 399 aa. From the predicted Cx amino acids sequences, the expected molecular weights of the proteins would be 30.9, 34.3, 43.2, and 44.9 kDa. Therefore, following the nomenclature system proposed by Beyer et al. [40], we named the genes accordingly. The homologies of amino acid sequences among the coho salmon cx genes were less than 55%. NCBI protein BLAST [41] searches revealed that coho salmon cx30.9, cx34.3, cx43.2 and cx44.9 sequences had the highest homology with Atlantic salmon Gjb6 (94.5%), zebrafish, Danio rerio, Cx34.5 (76.5%; GenBank accession number; NP_001025371.1), rainbow trout Cx43 (99.7%), and ayu Cx44.2 (72.5%; GenBank accession number; DQ487732.1), respectively. The amino acid sequences obtained for the four cx gene transcripts included all the characteristic features of Cx family proteins, including two cx consensus sequences, C(D, N)TXQPGCX2VCYD and CX3or4PCX3(L, I, V, M)(D, E, N)C(F, Y)(L, I, V, M)(S, A)(K, R)P, in the predicted extracellular loops (data not shown). Hydropathy analysis revealed that the coho salmon Cx proteins encoded by these genes would contain four hydrophilic domains and five hydrophobic domains that are typical of known Cx proteins (data not shown). Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis, was performed by the neighbor-joining method with ClustalX multiple alignment algorithm using NJPLOT software [42, 43]. This revealed that Cx34.3 and Cx43.2 are α-type, Cx30.9 is a β-type, and Cx44.9 is a γ- type cx (Figure 1). The zebrafish and mouse Cxs in our analysis were classified in the same groups as previously reported [17].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic relationship between coho salmon and other known Cx proteins. A neighbor-joining (NJ) distance tree comparing full-length amino acid sequences is shown. Bootstrap values (%) are shown for the NJ analyses. The GenBank accession numbers of the aligned deduced amino acid sequences of Cx proteins are as follows: Atlantic croaker Cx32.2 (L31542.1) and Cx32.7 (L31541.1), Atlantic salmon Cx32.2 (BT049836.1), gap junction protein alpha 1; Gja1 (BT059188.1), gap junction protein beta 1; Gjb1 (BT044946.1), gap junction protein beta 5; Gjb5 (BT057893.1) and gap junction protein beta 6; Gjb6 (NM_001140280.1), ayu Cx32.1 (DQ487733.1), Cx34.9 (DQ487730.1), Cx44.1 (DQ487731.1) and Cx44.2 (DQ487732.1), mouse, Mus musculus, Cx26 (also known as gap junction protein beta 2; Gjb2, AAA37276.1), Cx32 (also known as gap junction protein beta 1; Gjb1, AAA37296.2), Cx37 (also known as gap junction protein alpha 4; Gja4, NP_032146.1), Cx43 (also known as gap junction protein alpha 1; Gja1, NM_010288.3) and Cx45 (also known as gap junction protein gamma 1; Gjc1, NM_008122.3), rainbow trout Cx43 (also known as gap junction protein alpha 1; Gja1, DQ204869.1), red seabream Cx31.5 (AB037933.1) and Cx32.3 (AB048251.1), and zebrafish Cx28.8 (also known as gap junction protein beta 7; Gjb7, NP_001020715.1), Cx30.3 (also known as gap junction protein beta 6; Gjb6, NP_997990.2), Cx34.5 (also known as gap junction protein alpha a; Gjaa, NP_001025371.1), Cx43 (also known as gap junction protein alpha 1; Gja1, NP_571113.1), and Cx43.4 (also known as gap junction protein gamma 1; Gjc1, AAB36619.1). Human, Homo sapiens, Pannexin-1 (PANX1; NP_056183.2) was used as the outgroup.

Ovarian cx transcript levels during oogenesis

The levels of transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 showed a similar profile across-stages of oogenesis where levels were highest at the PN-stage and steadily declined thereafter (Figure 2A and 2D). Levels of transcripts for cx34.3 were lowest at the PN-stage, increased leading up to vitellogenesis, and reached peak levels by the mid VIT-stage (Figure 2B). Levels of cx43.2 transcripts remained low during previtellogenic stages, increased during vitellogenesis and peaked by the MAT-stage (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

Temporal expression patterns of four cx mRNAs during oogenesis. The expression levels of cx30.9 (A), cx34.3 (B), cx43.2 (C), and cx44.9 (D) were normalized to ef1a (inset of panel A). PN, perinucleolus stage follicles; CA, cortical alveolus stage follicles; LD, lipid droplet stage follicles; VIT, mid-vitellogenic stage follicles; MAT, preovulatory, maturing stage follicles. Bars not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05; n = 4/group of PN-, CA-, LD-, and VIT-stages, n = 3/group of MAT-stage, mean ± SEM).

Intraovarian distribution of cx mRNAs

The results of ISH for each cx are shown in Table 2 and Figure 3. ISH using PN-stage ovaries indicated that cx30.9 (Table 2 and Figure 3B) and cx44.9 (Table 2 and Figure 3E) transcripts were present in oocytes and follicle cells. As follicle cell layers at the PN-stage were very thin, it was not possible to distinguish whether both the theca and granulosa cells expressed these cx transcripts (Figure 3B and 3E). The signals for cx30.9 and cx44.9 transcripts were also detected in oocytes from the CA- to VIT-stage, however the signals in follicle cells were not detected in the CA-stage or thereafter (Table 2). ISH indicated that cx34.3 mRNA was only expressed in the follicle cells (only granulosa cells through the CA- to the VIT-stage, Table 2 and Figure 3H). Transcripts for cx43.4 were localized to follicle cells (both theca and granulosa cells at the CA-, LD- and early VIT-stages) and within oocytes (Table 2 and Figure 3K).
Table 2

Spatial expression profiles of cx transcripts in the coho salmon ovary

cx

Localization

PN-stage

CA-stage

LD-stage

VIT-stage

cx30.9

oocyte

+

+

w

w

 

follicle cells

+

G: x, T: x

G: x, T: x

G: x, T: x

cx34.3

oocyte

x

x

x

x

 

follicle cells

+

G: +, T: x

G: +, T: x

G: +, T: x

cx43.2

oocyte

+

+

+

+

 

follicle cells

+

G: +, T: +

G: +, T: +

G: +, T: +

cx44.9

oocyte

+

+

w

w

 

follicle cells

+

G: x, T: x

G: x, T: x

G: x, T: x

Each mark indicates signal levels of cxs by ISH. +, signal; w, weak signal; x, signal undetectable. PN, perinucleolus stage follicles; CA, cortical alveoli stage follicles; LD, lipid droplet stage follicles; VIT, early-vitellogenic stage follicles. G, granulosa cells; T, theca cells.

Figure 3

Subfolliclular distribution of mRNAs for cx30.9 , cx44.9 , cx34.3 , and cx43.2 in coho salmon ovaries. Perinucleolus (PN)-stage follicles were used for cx30.9 and cx44.9 analyses. Lipid droplet (LD)-stage follicles were used for cx34.3 and cx43.2 analyses. Sequential sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (cx30.9, A; cx44.9, D; cx34.3, G; and cx43.2, J), and hybridized with antisense (cx30.9, B; cx44.9, E; cx34.3, H; and cx43.2, K) and sense (cx30.9; C, cx44.9; F, cx34.3; I, and cx43.2; L) probes. n, nuclear; oo, ooplasm; fc, follicle cells; tc, theca cells; gc, granulosa cells; zp, zona pellucida. Scale bars = 50 μm.

Culture experiment 1: Effects of FSH and IGF1 on ovarian cx gene expression

In LD-stage follicles, FSH significantly reduced transcript levels for cx30.9 and cx44.9 in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 4A and 4D). In contrast, transcripts for cx34.3 increased in a concentration-dependent manner, reaching a more than 8-fold maximum elevation relative to control when treated with 500 ng FSH/ml (Figure 4B). FSH did not affect cx43.2 levels at any concentration (Figure 4C). IGF1 had effects similar to FSH on ovarian cx expression. Transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were suppressed in a concentration-dependent manner, but were only significantly down-regulated relative to controls at the highest concentration, 100 nM IGF1 (Figure 4E and 4H). Transcripts for cx43.2 were significantly suppressed by 100 nM IGF1 relative to controls (Figure 4G). In contrast, IGF1 elevated transcripts for cx34.3 in a concentration-dependent manner reaching a more than 13-fold maximum increase relative to control when treated with 100 nM IGF1 (Figure 4F).
Figure 4

Hormonal regulation of ovarian cx genes in vitro : culture experiment 1. Effects of varying FSH (10, 50, 100, or 500 ng/ml) and IGF1 (1, 10, or 100 nM) concentrations on levels of transcripts for cx30.9 (A, E), cx34.3 (B, F), cx43.2 (C, G), cx44.9 (D, H) in lipid droplet (LD)-stage follicles. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6) and presented relative to the expression of controls (cont; Time 36 h, no hormones, set to 1). Bars not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). Asterisks denote values that significantly differ between initial (Time 0, no hormones) and control (cont; Time 36 h, no hormones), **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. ns, no significant difference.

Levels of cx transcripts in LD-stage ovaries cultured in control medium for 0 h (initial) and 36 h showed different patterns. Transcripts for cx30.9 (Figure 4A) and cx44.9 (Figure 4D) did not change significantly between initial and control. Transcripts for cx34.3 decreased dramatically reaching a more than 64-fold maximum decline by 36 h (Figure 4B). In contrast, transcripts for cx43.2 increased more than 3-fold relative to initial levels after 36 h in culture (Figure 4C).

Culture experiment 2: Effects of LH and IGF1 on ovarian cx gene expression

In late VIT-stage follicles, LH increased the level of transcripts for cx34.3 in a concentration-dependent manner, reaching a more than 11-fold increase relative to control when treated with 500 ng LH/ml (Figure 5A). In contrast, LH did not affect transcripts for cx43.2 at any concentration tested (Figure 5B). IGF1 elevated transcripts for cx34.3 in a concentration-dependent manner reaching a more than 8-fold maximum increase relative to control when treated with 100 nM IGF1 (Figure 5C). In contrast, IGF1 suppressed transcripts for cx43.2 in a concentration-dependent manner, but this was only significant with 100 nM IGF1 (Figure 5D). Transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were very low at the late-VIT stage, and neither LH nor IGF1 altered levels of these transcripts at any concentration tested (data not shown).
Figure 5

Hormonal regulation of ovarian cx genes in vitro : culture experiment 2. Effects of varying LH (10, 50, 100, or 500 ng/ml) and IGF1 (1, 10, or 100 nM) concentrations on transcripts for cx34.3 (A, C) and cx43.2 (B, D) at the late vitellogenic (VIT)-stage. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6) and presented relative to the expression of controls (cont; Time 36 h, no hormones, set to 1). Bars not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). Asterisks denote values that significantly differ between initial (Time 0, no hormones) and control samples, **P < 0.01. ns, no significant difference.

Levels of transcripts for each cx gene in late VIT-stage ovaries cultured in control medium for 0 h (initial) and 36 h showed different patterns. Notably, transcripts for cx34.3 decreased more than 10-fold after 36 h in culture (Figure 5A or 5C), while transcripts for cx43.2 increased after the 36-h incubation, but this was not significant (Figure 5B or 5D). Transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were very low in the initial sample and did not change after 36 h culture (data not shown).

In vitro ovarian E2 production

Medium E2 levels increased in a concentration-dependent manner in response to FSH (culture experiment 1, Figure 6A) and LH (culture experiment 2, Figure 6C). In contrast, IGF1 had no effect on E2 production at any concentration in both experiments (Figure 6B and 6D).
Figure 6

In vitro ovarian E2 production. Effect of varying FSH (A) and IGF1 (B) concentrations on in vitro E2 production by lipid droplet (LD)-stage follicles (culture experiment 1) and varying LH (C) and IGF1 (D) concentrations on in vitro E2 production by late vitellogenic (VIT)-stage follicles (culture experiment 2). Incubations were for 36 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Bars not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Discussion

In this study, we have shown that multiple cx gene transcripts, designated cx30.9, cx34.3, cx43.2 and cx44.9, are expressed in coho salmon ovaries, have distinct developmental expression patterns, and differ in their hormonal regulation. The sequence homologies, consensus sequences, and predicted topologies of the four deduced proteins are in strong agreement with the predicted structural traits of Cx family proteins [4]. Such multiple expression of cx gene transcripts in the ovary is well known in mammals [9]; however, interrelationships between various cx isoforms to form a connexon and ultimately GJs are poorly understood. GJs are composed of two connexons, both of which are hexamers of Cx proteins. As most cell types express more than one cx isoform, a connexon could potentially be composed of either one type of Cx (homomeric) or more than one type of Cx (heteromeric) [44]. When two identical connexons dock, they form a homotypic GJ, while when two different connexons dock, they form a heterotypic GJ [44]. We did not examine the functional aspects of the four different Cx proteins in coho salmon; however, previous studies in two Perciform fishes suggest that heterotypic GJs have much lower functional activity than homotypic GJs [45, 46]. To determine the compatibility between four different Cx proteins in coho salmon, further analyses using an in vitro cell expression system and dye transfer assay [47, 48] will be needed.

Although our phylogenetic analysis showed that cx30.9 and cx44.9 were classified in the β group and γ group, respectively, the results of spatiotemporal analyses and hormone effects on these genes were similar. Transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were highly expressed at the PN-stage, however these transcripts decreased dramatically by the LD-stage and remained low thereafter. Further, these genes were expressed in follicle cells (theca and/or granulosa cells) and oocytes only at the PN-stage. These data suggest that GJs composed of cx30.9 and cx44.9 could have important roles during early oogenesis and could form GJs between follicle cells and the oocyte, and amongst follicle cells at the PN-stage. To date, there are no cx isoforms identified in fishes that show the exact spatiotemporal expression pattern as coho salmon cx30.9 and cx44.9. However, in ayu, two cx isoforms designated cx44.1 and cx44.2, that have the highest homology to coho salmon cx44.9, were similarly expressed at the highest levels during early oogenesis [49], but were only expressed in the oocyte and levels did not decline at more advanced stages of oogenesis as seen in salmon. Although coho salmon cx30.9 and cx44.9 share some similarities to ayu cx44.1 and cx44.2, the difference in localization of the cx transcripts and the low levels of these two coho salmon cx transcripts during the LD-through MAT- stage suggest they are unlikely to have the same function as the ayu cx genes.

The gene encoding cx34.3 was classified in the α group in our phylogenetic analysis, began to increase at the CA-stage, reached maximum levels at the mid VIT-stage and remained high thereafter. Further, ISH revealed that cx34.3 was localized only in granulosa cells. These data suggest that cx34.3 may compose homotypic GJs, only between granulosa cells, which could have important roles in vitellogenesis and final maturation. In teleosts, it is generally accepted that granulosa cells produce steroid hormones such as E2 and MIH from their respective precursors [50]. In mammals, it is well known that the hormone-producing cells are also connected by functional GJs and are needed for the cells to biosynthesize, store and release hormone effectively [51, 52]. Gap junctional communication amongst granulosa cells may have an important role in steroidogenesis [12, 53]. Thus, in coho salmon, GJs composed of cx34.3 between granulosa cells may have an important role in ovarian steroidogenesis, but further research will be needed to establish this.

In contrast to cx34.3, transcripts for cx43.2 increased later in vitellogenesis, reached maximum levels in the preovulatory follicles, and were localized in both follicle cells (theca and granulosa cells at CA-, LD- and early VIT-stages) and oocytes. These data suggest that cx43.2 could compose homotypic GJs, between the follicle cells and the oocyte, and between the follicle cells, and that GJs formed by cx43.2 may be involved in late vitellogenesis and final maturation. The observed increase in cx43.2 at the MAT-stage was consistent with a previous report of rainbow trout cx43 [33], a homologue of coho salmon cx43.2. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that coho salmon cx43.2 and trout cx43 were both classified in the α group. The temporal expression pattern and follicular localization of coho salmon cx43.2 showed a similar pattern to that of ayu cx34.9 [49]. In ayu, cx34.9 appears to contribute to formation of GJs between the oocyte and the granulosa cells, and may have an important role in transmitting the LH-signal received in the follicle cells to the oocyte via a second messenger such as cAMP during acquisition of OMC [14, 15, 49]. Although we have no empirical data on the function of coho salmon cx43.2, it may have a similar role to ayu cx34.9 given the similarity of their spatiotemporal expression patterns.

Hormonal regulation of cx gene transcripts has been reported in several fishes. However, previous studies of the hormonal regulation of ovarian cx gene transcripts mainly focused on MAT-stage follicles [2125]. To assess hormonal regulation of cx gene transcripts during various stages of oogenesis, we performed two ovarian culture experiments using previtellogenic (LD-stage; culture experiment 1) and late VIT-stage (culture experiment 2) follicles. At the LD-stage, both FSH and IGF1 increased transcript levels for cx34.3, but decreased transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9. In late VIT-stage follicles, LH and IGF1 had a stimulatory effect on transcripts for cx34.3. While LH had no effect on levels of transcripts for cx43.2, IGF1 showed a clear inhibitory effect. These data suggest that gonadotropins and IGF1 regulate ovarian cx trancripts in a cx- and stage-specific manner, and may influence GJ formation and therefore communication within the ovary. Although the stimulatory effect of IGF1 on the number of GJs has been reported in red seabream ovary [12], to our knowledge this is the first report of IGF1 regulation of ovarian cx gene expression. As IGF1 receptors were found in granulosa cells of coho salmon [38], it is possible that IGF1 (either endocrine or paracrine IGF) regulates cx34.3 gene expression in granulosa cells. The up- and down- regulation of specific cx genes by gonadotropins shown in the present study is consistent with previous studies in Atlantic croaker [2325]. Although the mechanisms of ovarian cx activation by hormones were not addressed in the present study, studies of Atlantic croaker revealed that gonadotopic regulation of cx genes was mediated by the cAMP-protein kinase A transduction pathway [24, 54]. Obviously, further promoter studies are needed to elucidate the role of second messenger systems or other transcription factors in the regulation of cx gene expression by gonadotropins and IGF1 in the ovary of coho salmon.

Our results show that both FSH and LH, but not IGF1, stimulated in vitro production of ovarian E2, thus we cannot rule out the possibility that the observed effects of gonadotropins were mediated by steroids. In mammals, many studies indicated that steroid hormones regulate cx gene expression [5557]. For example, in the ovariectomized rat endometrium, a high amount of progesterone in combination with low E2 levels suppressed transcripts for cx26 and cx43, but higher E2 levels had no effect on cx26 expression [57]. In Atlantic croaker, E2 had a biphasic effect on cx32.7 [25]. At a low concentration, E2 had no effect on cx32.7 transcripts, but at high concentrations, it inhibited expression [25]. Thus, E2 appears to regulate cx gene expression in teleosts as well. To clarify the involvement of steroid hormones in the regulation of ovarian cx gene expression, further in vitro culture experiments using inhibitors of E2 synthesis or other steroid hormones such as progesterone and testosterone will be needed.

The developmental patterns and hormonal regulation of cx gene expression were consistent with what is known about plasma levels of FSH, LH, and IGF1 during the reproductive cycle of salmon. For example, transcripts for cx34.3 began to increase at the CA- to LD-stage and peaked during mid vitellogenesis. This expression profile is consistent with plasma FSH [26, 27] and IGF1 profiles in female coho salmon [27, 29] and our results indicate that both of these hormones stimulate ovarian cx34.3 expression in vitro. Plasma levels of FSH [26] and IGF1 [28] in salmon decrease at final oocyte maturation, while plasma LH levels increase during this period [26]. Our results indicate that at this stage, LH increased expression of cx34.3. Taken together, high expression of cx34.3 at the LD - to VIT-stage could be regulated by FSH and IGF1, and then at the MAT-stage, LH could maintain high expression of cx34.3. Interestingly, incubation of LD-stage ovarian follicles in control medium without any hormones for 36 h reduced transcripts for cx34.3 more than 64-fold relative to the initial levels, and this reduction did not fully recover by incubation with FSH and IGF1, even at the highest hormone concentrations. These data suggest that cx34.3 is regulated by a number of factors in vivo, including FSH and IGF1, and perhaps other unidentified factors at this stage. Since we did not test any combination of hormones in our experiments, we do not yet know if there are additive or synergistic effects of gonadotropins and IGF1.

In contrast to cx34.3, FSH and LH did not have any effect on levels of cx43.2 transcripts. It was somewhat surprising that LH, in particular, did not show any effect on this gene, despite the expression profile of cx43.2 being similar to that of plasma LH [26]. Although the existence of other regulators of cx43.2 remains a possibility, one potential scenario to explain ovarian cx43.2 regulation in coho salmon is inhibitory regulation by IGF1. Both culture experiments revealed that only IGF1 inhibited cx43.2 expression. In salmon, plasma IGF1 levels typically increase during early secondary oocyte growth and decrease at the preovulatory stage [2729]. Temporal expression analyses revealed that transcripts for cx43.2 were relatively low until the mid VIT-stage, but significantly increased by the MAT-stage. Thus, IGF1 may inhibit cx43.2 expression through most of oogenesis, and the natural decrease in plasma IGF1 prior to final oocyte maturation may induce elevations in cx43.2 expression. Notably, incubation of ovarian follicles in control medium for 36 h induced more than a 3-fold increase in this gene relative to initial samples in culture experiment 1. These in vitro data as well as the developmental pattern in vivo support the idea that in vivo factors negatively regulate cx43.2 expression, and that one of these factors may be IGF1.

At the LD-stage, transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were down-regulated by both FSH and IGF1 in vitro. Temporal expression analyses of these transcripts revealed that their expression decreased at the LD-stage. Thus, the decrease in these transcripts in our across-stage comparison could be due to increases in FSH [26, 27] and IGF1 [27, 29] that occur naturally in this species. Further research will be needed to identify factors that may up-regulate cx30.9 and cx44.9 gene expression during early oogenesis.

Conclusion

In this study, we show that at least four different cx genes, designated cx30.9, cx34.3, cx43.2, and cx44.9, are expressed in the coho salmon ovarian follicle. Transcripts for cx30.9 and cx44.9 were highly expressed in PN-stage follicles and localized to the follicle cells and oocytes. Transcripts for cx34.3 were highly expressed at the mid VIT-stage and were localized only to granulosa cells. Transcripts for cx43.2 were highly expressed at the MAT-stage in theca and granulosa cells, and oocytes. Thus, the results of spatiotemporal analyses revealed that cx30.9, cx34.3, cx43.2, and cx44.9 were under ovarian stage and cell-type specific control during oogenesis. Further, FSH, LH, and IGF1 differentially regulated these ovarian cx gene transcripts in vitro. To our knowledge, this is the first report of IGF1 regulation of ovarian cx gene expression. These data indicate that the differences in spatiotemporal expression profiles and hormone-mediated regulation of these four cx transcripts may be related to the function of ovarian GJs during different stages of ovarian cellular differentiation. Future studies on the cell-cell communication permitted by GJs formed by these Cx proteins will be important to understanding development of the ovarian follicle in teleosts.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank J.T. Dickey (University of Washington) for his assistance with this work. This research was funded partially by NOAA Fisheries and by National Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2007-35203-18088 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences, University of Washington
(2)
Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries

References

  1. Eppig JJ: Intercommunication between mammalian oocytes and companion somatic cells. Bioessays. 1991, 13: 569-574. 10.1002/bies.950131105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gilchrist RB, Ritter LJ, Armstrong DT: Oocyte-somatic cell interactions during follicle development in mammals. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004, 82-83: 431-446.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kumar NM, Gilula NB: The gap junction communication channel. Cell. 1996, 84: 381-388. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81282-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA: Connexin family of gap junction proteins. J Membrane Biol. 1990, 116: 187-194. 10.1007/BF01868459.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL: Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem. 1996, 238: 1-27. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grazul-Bilska AT, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA: Gap junctions in the ovaries. Biol Reprod. 1997, 57: 947-957. 10.1095/biolreprod57.5.947.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kidder GM, Mhawi AA: Gap junctions and ovarian folliculogenesis. Reproduction. 2002, 123: 613-620. 10.1530/rep.0.1230613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dekel N: Cellular, biochemical and molecular mechanisms regulating oocyte maturation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005, 234: 19-25. 10.1016/j.mce.2004.09.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gershon E, Plaks V, Dekel N: Gap junctions in the ovary: expression, localization and function. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008, 282: 18-25. 10.1016/j.mce.2007.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Patiño R, Sullivan CV: Ovarian follicle growth, maturation, and ovulation in teleost fish. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2002, 26: 57-70. 10.1023/A:1023311613987.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. York WS, Patiño R, Thomas P: Ultrastructural changes in follicle cell-oocyte associations during development and maturation of the ovarian follicle in Atlantic croaker. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993, 92: 402-418. 10.1006/gcen.1993.1177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Patiño R, Kagawa H: Regulation of gap junctions and oocyte maturational competence by gonadotropin and insulin-like growth factor-I in ovarian follicles of red seabream. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999, 115: 454-462. 10.1006/gcen.1999.7341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolamba D, Patiño R, Yoshizaki G, Thomas P: Changes in homologous and heterologous gap junction contacts during maturation-inducing hormone-dependent meiotic resumption in ovarian follicles of Atlantic croaker. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003, 131: 291-295. 10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00015-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yamamoto Y, Yoshizaki G, Takeuchi T, Soyano K, Patiño R: Role of gap junctions and protein kinase A during the development of oocyte maturational competence in Ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008, 155: 789-795. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yamamoto Y, Yoshizaki G: Heterologous gap junctions between granulosa cells and oocytes in ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis): formation and role during luteinizing hormone-dependent acquisition of oocyte maturational competence. J Reprod Dev. 2008, 54: 1-5. 10.1262/jrd.19178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Söhl G, Willecke K: An update on connexin genes and their nomenclature in mouse and man. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003, 10: 173-180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eastman SD, Chen THP, Falk MM, Mendelson TC, Iovine MK: Phylogenetic analysis of three complete gap junction gene families reveals lineage-specific duplications and highly supported gene classes. Genomics. 2006, 87: 265-274. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Oyamada M, Oyamada Y, Takamatsu T: Regulation of connexin expression. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2005, 1719: 6-23. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.11.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sommersberg B, Bulling A, Salzer U, Fröhlich U, Garfield RE: Gap junction communication and connexin 43 gene expression in a rat granulosa cell line: regulation by follicle-stimulating hormone. Biol Reprod. 2000, 63: 1661-1668. 10.1095/biolreprod63.6.1661.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Granot I, Dekel N: Phosphorylation and expression of connexin-43 ovarian gap junction protein are regulated by luteinizing hormone. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 30502-30509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Choi CY, Takashima F: Molecular cloning and hormonal control in the ovary of connexin 31.5 mRNA and correlation with the appearance of oocyte maturational competence in red seabream. J Exp Biol. 2000, 203: 3299-3306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Choi CY, Takemura A: Molecular cloning and expression of connexin 32.3 cDNA in the ovary from the red seabream (Pagrus major). Comp Biochem Physiol B. 2001, 129: 767-775. 10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00387-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshizaki G, Patiño R, Thomas P: Connexin messenger ribonucleic acids in the ovary of Atlantic croaker: molecular cloning and characterization, hormonal control, and correlation with appearance of oocyte maturational competence. Biol Reprod. 1994, 51: 493-503. 10.1095/biolreprod51.3.493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang X, Patiño R, Thomas P, Yoshizaki G: Developmental and protein kinase-dependent regulation of ovarian connexin mRNA and oocyte maturational competence in Atlantic croaker. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999, 114: 330-339. 10.1006/gcen.1999.7262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chang X, Patiño R, Yoshizaki G, Thomas P, Lee VH: Hormonal regulation and cellular distribution of connexin 32.2 and connexin 32.7 RNAs in the ovary of Atlantic croaker. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2000, 120: 146-156. 10.1006/gcen.2000.7549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Swanson P: Salmon gonadotropins: reconciling old and new ideas. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on the Reproductive Physiology of Fish: 7-12 July 1996; Sheffield, UK. Edited by: Scott AP, Sumpter JP, Kime DE, Rolfe MS. 1996, 2-7.Google Scholar
  27. Campbell B, Dickey J, Beckman B, Young G, Pierce A, Fukada H, Swanson P: Previtellogenic oocyte growth in salmon: relationships among body growth, plasma insulin-like growth factor-1, estradiol-17beta, follicle-stimulating hormone and expression of ovarian genes for insulin-like growth factors, steroidogenic-acute regulatory protein and receptors for gonadotropins, growth hormone, and somatolactin. Biol Reprod. 2006, 75: 34-44. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.049494.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Onuma TA, Makino K, Katsumata H, Beckman BR, Ban M, Ando H, Fukuwaka M, Azumaya T, Swanson P, Urano A: Changes in the plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor-I from the onset of spawning migration through upstream migration in chum salmon. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010, 165: 237-243. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.07.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yamamoto Y, Luckenbach JA, Goetz FW, Young G, Swanson P: Disruption of the salmon reproductive endocrine axis through prolonged nutritional stress: Changes in circulating hormone levels and transcripts for ovarian genes involved in steroidogenesis and apoptosis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011Google Scholar
  30. Nagahama Y: The functional morphology of teleost gonads. Fish Physiology. Volume IX, Reproduction. Part A, Endocrine Tissue and Hormones. Edited by: Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Donaldson EM. 1983, New York: Academic Press, 223-275.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Luckenbach JA, Iliev DB, Goetz FW, Swanson P: Identification of differentially expressed ovarian genes during primary and early secondary oocyte growth in coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008, 6: 2-10.1186/1477-7827-6-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. DFCI R. trout gene index database. [http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/tgi/gimain.pl?gudb=r_trout]
  33. Bobe J, Nguyen T, Jalabert B: Targeted gene expression profiling in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) ovary during maturational competence acquisition and oocyte maturation. Biol Reprod. 2004, 71: 73-82. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Luckenbach JA, Dickey JT, Swanson P: Follicle-stimulating hormone regulation of ovarian transcripts for steroidogenesis-related proteins and cell survival, growth and differentiation factors in vitro during early secondary oocyte growth in coho salmon. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011, 171: 52-63. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.12.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Planas JV, Athos J, Goetz FW, Swanson P: Regulation of ovarian steroidogenesis in vitro by follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone during sexual maturation in salmonid fish. Biol Reprod. 2000, 62: 1262-1269. 10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Swanson P, Suzuki K, Kawauchi H, Dickhoff WW: Isolation and characterization of two coho salmon gonadotropins, GTH I and GTH II. Biol Reprod. 1991, 44: 29-38. 10.1095/biolreprod44.1.29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Swanson P, Bernard M, Nozaki M, Suzuki K, Kawauchi H, Dickhoff WW: Gonadotropins I and II in juvenile coho salmon. Fish Physiol Biochem. 1989, 7: 169-176. 10.1007/BF00004704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Maestro M, Planas JV, Moriyama S, Gutiérrez J, Planas J, Swanson P: Ovarian receptors for insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and effects of IGF-I on steroid production by isolated follicular layers of the preovulatory coho salmon ovarian follicle. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1997, 106: 189-201. 10.1006/gcen.1996.6863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sower SA, Schreck CB: Steroid and thyroid hormones during sexual maturation of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in seawater or fresh water. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1982, 47: 42-53. 10.1016/0016-6480(82)90082-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA: Connexin43: A protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver. J Cell Biol. 1987, 105: 2621-2629. 10.1083/jcb.105.6.2621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. NCBI BLAST. [http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/]
  42. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 2947-2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4: 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Corttrell GT, Burt JM: Functional consequences of heterogeneous gap junction channel formation and its influence in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2005, 1711: 126-141. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.11.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bruzzone R, White TW, Yoshizaki G, Patiño R, Paul DL: Intercellular channels in teleosts: functional characterization of two connexins from Atlantic croaker. FEBS Lett. 1995, 358: 301-304. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01457-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. O'Brien J, Bruzzone R, White TW, Al-Ubaidi MR, Ripps H: Cloning and expression of two related connexins from the perch retina define a distinct subgroup of the connexin family. J Neurosci. 1998, 18: 7625-7637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Meda P: Assaying the molecular permeability of connexin channels. Connexin Methods and Protocols. Edited by: Bruzzone R, Giaume C. 2001, New Jersey: Humana Press, 201-224. [Walker JM (Series Editor): Methods and Molecular Biology, vol 154.]Google Scholar
  48. Skerrett IM, Merritt M, Zhou L, Zhu H, Cao F, Smith JF, Nicholson BJ: Applying the Xenopus oocyte expression system to the analysis of gap junction proteins. Connexin Methods and Protocols. Edited by: Bruzzone R, Giaume C. 2001, New Jersey: Humana Press, 225-249. [Walker JM (Series Editor): Methods and Molecular Biology, vol 154.]Google Scholar
  49. Yamamoto Y, Yoshizaki G, Takeuchi T, Soyano K, Itoh F, Patiño R: Differential expression and localization of four connexins in the ovary of the ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis). Mol Reprod Dev. 2007, 74: 1113-1123. 10.1002/mrd.20562.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagahama Y: Endocrine regulation of gametogenesis in fish. Int J Dev Biol. 1994, 38: 217-229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Serre-Beinier V, Mas C, Calabrese A, Caton D, Bauquis J, Caille D, Charollais A, Cirulli V, Meda P: Connexins and secretion. Biol Cell. 2002, 94: 477-492. 10.1016/S0248-4900(02)00024-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Michon L, Nlend RN, Bavamian S, Bischoff L, Boucard N, Caille D, Cancela J, Charollais A, Charpantier E, Klee P, Peyrou M, Populaire C, Zulianello L, Meda P: Involvement of gap junctional communication in secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2005, 1719: 82-101. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.11.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ke FC, Fang SH, Lee MT, Sheu SY, Lai SY, Chen YJ, Huang FL, Wang PS, Stocco DM, Hwang JJ: Lindane, a gap junction blocker, suppresses FSH and transforming growth factor β1-induced connexin43 gap junction formation and steroidogenesis in rat granulosa cells. J Endocrinol. 2005, 184: 555-566. 10.1677/joe.1.05776.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yoshizaki G, Jin W, Patiño R, Thomas P, Janecek L: Structural organization of the Atlantic croaker connexin 32.2 gene and its 5' flanking region. Mar Biotechnol. 2000, 2: 154-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Grümmer R, Chwalisz K, Mulholland J, Traub O, Winterhager E: Regulation of connexin26 and connexin43 expression in rat endometrium by ovarian steroid hormones. Biol Reprod. 1994, 51: 1109-1116. 10.1095/biolreprod51.6.1109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Risek B, Klier FG, Phillips A, Hahn DW, Gilula NB: Gap junction regulation in the uterus and ovaries of immature rats by estrogen and progesterone. J Cell Sci. 1995, 108: 1017-1032.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Grümmer R, Traub O, Winterhager E: Gap junction connexin genes cx26 and cx43 are differentially regulated by ovarian steroid hormones in rat endometrium. Endocrinology. 1999, 140: 2509-2516. 10.1210/en.140.6.2509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yamamoto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement