Open Access

Three-dimensional in vitro follicle growth: overview of culture models, biomaterials, design parameters and future directions

  • Nina Desai1Email author,
  • Anastasia Alex1,
  • Faten AbdelHafez1,
  • Anthony Calabro2,
  • James Goldfarb1,
  • Aaron Fleischman2 and
  • Tommaso Falcone1
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology20108:119

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-119

Received: 19 July 2010

Accepted: 14 October 2010

Published: 14 October 2010

Abstract

In vitro ovarian follicle culture is a new frontier in assisted reproductive technology with tremendous potential, especially for fertility preservation. Folliculogenesis within the ovary is a complex process requiring interaction between somatic cell components and the oocyte. Conventional two-dimensional culture on tissue culture substrata impedes spherical growth and preservation of the spatial arrangements between oocyte and surrounding granulosa cells. Granulosa cell attachment and migration can leave the oocyte naked and unable to complete the maturation process. Recognition of the importance of spatial arrangements between cells has spurred research in to three-dimensional culture system. Such systems may be vital when dealing with human primordial follicles that may require as long as three months in culture. In the present work we review pertinent aspects of in vitro follicle maturation, with an emphasis on tissue-engineering solutions for maintaining the follicular unit during the culture interval. We focus primarily on presenting the various 3-dimensional culture systems that have been applied for in vitro maturation of follicle:oocyte complexes. We also try to present an overview of outcomes with various biomaterials and animal models and also the limitations of the existing systems.

Background

In vitro ovarian follicle culture is a new frontier in assisted reproductive technology with tremendous potential. The ovarian cortex is populated with primordial follicles containing immature oocytes in meiotic arrest. In vivo, hormonal influences trigger the maturation of a single follicle to the Graafian stage and the ovulation of a single mature oocyte per cycle. During IVF treatment, hormone injections are used to stimulate the maturation of multiple follicles within the ovary [1]. Multiple mature oocytes can then be surgically extracted from the patient's ovaries. An alternate approach that is the focus of research by many fertility specialists, involves extraction of ovarian tissue/follicles and induction of the growth and maturation of oocytes in vitro[2]. Such technology may be especially beneficial to cancer patients, who are at risk of losing their future fertility as a result of damage to the ovary from chemo and/or radiotherapy. A potential solution for these patients is to cryopreserve intact pieces of ovarian tissue containing numerous immature follicles [3] or to cryopreserve immature follicles enzymatically isolated from this ovarian tissue [4]. Both of these techniques, however, require that the immature follicles are matured at some point and are induced to produce mature oocytes that can be fertilized. The major impediment to ovarian and follicle cryopreservation has been our limited ability to culture and eventually induce in vitro maturation (IVM) of the follicle/oocyte complex within the laboratory [5]. The process of IVM requires that whole follicles be grown for extended periods of time in vitro[6].

In the present work we review pertinent aspects of in vitro follicle maturation, with an emphasis on tissue-engineering solutions for maintaining the follicular unit during the culture interval. We focus primarily on presenting the various 3-dimensional (3-D) culture systems that have been applied for in vitro maturation of follicle:oocyte complexes. We also try to present an overview of outcomes with various biomaterials and animal models and also the limitations of the existing systems. Finally, we touch on the use of microfluidics for gamete/embryo culture and its potential application to follicular culture.

Importance of maintaining of follicular architecture

Folliculogenesis within the ovary is a complex process requiring interaction between somatic cell components and the oocyte. At birth the human ovary contains 1-2 million primordial follicles, each containing an oocyte in meiotic arrest at the prophase stage [7]. The oocyte is surrounded by a layer of somatic granulosa cells. Follicular growth from the primordial to the pre-ovulatory stage occurs in two distinct stages. The first growth phase occurs very slowly and is not directly dependent on gonadotrophin levels [8]. There is proliferation of the granaulosa cell layer surrounding the oocyte and an increase in both follicle and oocyte diameter. This stage can take weeks in rodents and months in larger animal species, including humans. In the human, follicles increase in size from 30-50 μm in primordial resting follicles, to 100-200 μm in pre-antral follicles [9]. The second phase of follicular growth is far more rapid and culminates with the ovulation of a mature oocyte. Follicles are now responsive to follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). The formation of a fluid filled antrum and synthesis of steroid hormones marks the transition to the antral phase of follicle development. Human follicles are over 18 mm when they reach the pre-ovulatory or Graafian stage and the oocyte is close to its final size, around 120 μM [10]. The multi-layer follicle is now surrounded by a basement membrane that separates it from the underlying vascularized thecal cell layer.

Oocyte growth and cytoplasmic meiotic competence are dependent on the gap junctions between the oocyte and the granulosa cells [11]. Knock out mice lacking the gene encoding for gap junction protein connexin-37 have impaired folliculogenesis [12]. The gap junctions connecting the granulosa cells and the oocyte enable sharing of secreted paracrine factors that promote the growth of both cell types [1316](reviewed in [17, 18]). Evidence suggests that granulosa cell proliferation and certain metabolic processes are controlled by oocyte-derived secretions [18, 19]. The oocyte is unable to transport certain amino acids, carry out glycolysis and cholesterol biosynthesis without the cooperation of granulosa cells in providing necessary factors [20]. The oocyte overcomes these metabolic deficiencies by stimulating expression of specific genes in the cumulus cells that control synthesis of enzymes and amino acids that it needs. Severing of the gap junction and intercellular communication during in vitro culture triggers premature ovulation and eventual degeneration of the released oocyte [19].

Maintenance of the intricate 3-D architecture and granulosa-oocyte interaction may therefore be critical for successful in vitro maturation of follicles. In conventional 2-dimensional (2-D) tissue culture systems, the follicle tends to flatten and granulosa cells surrounding and nurturing the growing oocyte, migrate away, leaving it naked and unable to complete the maturation process [21]. This is especially true when dealing with human primordial follicles, which may need as long as three months in culture [22].

Culture systems for follicle growth 2-D versus 3-D

The majority of early and ground breaking work on in vitro follicle culture was undertaken using conventional 2-D culture methodology. Pre-antral follicle growth in multi-well plates [23] as well as in microdrop culture [2326] yields mature oocytes. Eppig and Schroeder [13] were able to achieve live births after in vitro maturation of mouse pre-antral follicles on a collagen impregnated gel and in vitro fertilization of the IVM oocytes. By including eight days of in situ culture of the intact newborn mouse ovary, the same collagen culture methodology could also be used to successfully mature primordial follicles and produce live offspring [27]. Other 2-D systems used for follicle culture include membranes coated with extracellular matrix proteins [2831]. Despite the successes achieved with these 2D systems, they have been sub-optimal for sustained culture of cow, sheep and human follicles (reviewed in [21]). Culture on treated membranes or tissue culture substrata, impedes preservation of the spatial arrangements of cells seen in vivo. Follicular flattening due to granulosa cell attachment to the tissue culture vessel is problematic making the follicle complex extremely vulnerable to disruption of gap junctions. With enzymatic follicle isolation techniques, perturbation of the basal lamina surrounding the follicle can lead to granulosa cell migration away from the oocyte.

Establishing an in vitro culture model that can more accurately mimic the in vivo ovarian growth environment has therefore been the focus of much research. To this end, a tissue bioengineering approach has attracted much interest. The recognition of the importance of spatial arrangements between cells has spurred research in to 3-D culture systems. Data from a variety of different cellular models indicate that 3-D culture modulates cell behavior, growth, secretions, response to stimuli and communication with surrounding cells. In a landmark study, investigators were able to block the cell surface receptor β-1 integrin and completely alter the behavior of breast cancer cells grown in 3-D culture, in a manner never observed during conventional 2-D culture [32, 33]. Others have noted that the gene expression profile of cells grown in 3-D culture more closely resembles that seen in vivo[34] and distinctly differs from that found after conventional 2-D culture. In addition to the spatial arrangement of the cells it is becoming increasingly evident that the extracellular matrix support structure (ECM) plays a defining role in organizing communication between cells, controlling cell differentiation and modulating response to biochemical signals from the cellular microenvironment (reviewed in [35]).

Scaffolding, matrix proteins and 3-D culture systems to maintain follicular architecture are avenues of research currently being explored by numerous investigators to gain further insight on the growth requirements of follicles. These 3-D systems are characterized by their ability to maintain the spherical morphology of the ovarian follicle and preserve the critical cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions within the surrounding stromal tissue, thereby allowing follicles to successfully complete the maturation process [21]. Figure 1 depicts growth of pre-antral follicles in a 2-D vs 3-D culture system. Encapsulation of follicles may protect them from gap junction disruption through shear stress [36, 37] and may preserve expression of the gene encoding for the gap-junction protein connexin [38]. Contiguous assembly of granulosa cells around the oocyte also prevents the follicles from undergoing premature ovulation [39].
Figure 1

A comparison of follicular growth in a 2-D vs 3-D culture system. With 2-D growth granulosa cell migration away from the oocyte is evident with time in culture, leaving the oocyte vulnerable for premature extrusion. Pre-antral follicles embedded in hydrogel maintain their 3-D architecture. Granulosa cell expansion occurs in all directions resulting in less stress on gap junctions.

Another advantage may be that trophic factors released by granulosa cells remain in close proximity to the oocyte exerting a positive effect on oogenesis and possibly fostering new local gap junctions. This is an advantage not shared by 2-D culture vessels where the volume of medium in culture vessels and polarization of granulosa cells towards the culture substrata may result in a more diffuse and less uniform exposure to secreted factors.

Despite the potential advantages with 3-D culture, there is still a good deal of controversy as to how best to achieve such a culture system. The questions revolve around the type of biomaterials available, their characteristics, permeability, toxicity and ability to be molded and handled with ease during follicle loading and harvest. In addition, their biologically usefulness ultimately depends on survival of the follicle and maturation of the oocyte in vitro. The animal species and the length of time needed for follicular culture also warrant consideration in determining whether 3-D culture will be beneficial. In humans, in vitro follicle maturation from primary to the antral stage can take more than 120 days [22], in contrast to 30 or so days for follicle maturation in rodent species (reviewed in [40]). Moreover, by the early antral stage human follicles measure 2-5 mm in diameter. Active perfusion systems may therefore prove necessary to assure sufficient nutrient supply to multi-layered follicles if cultured in a 3-D environment.

Design parameters for biomaterials for 3-D culture

Chemical and physical properties of biomaterials present certain design limitations that must be meshed with the physiologic needs of the follicular unit. First and foremost, the chemical composition must be non-cytotoxic, allowing sustained cell viability for extended culture periods. Growth of follicular diameter during the course of in vitro maturation dictates materials with a certain amount of elasticity allowing expansion of the granulosa cell layers, yet providing enough support to retain spherical shape and prevent inadvertent denudation of the oocyte. This is especially important in 3-D culture systems that physically encapsulate the follicle within a biomaterial. In addition to maintaining structural integrity, this biomaterial must allow adequate gas exchange, diffusion of nutrients and removal of cellular waste. Within the ovary there is an increase in vascularization as one moves deeper in to the ovarian cortex where secondary and pre-antral follicles grow [41]. This suggests a stronger need for oxygen diffusion during the final stages of follicle maturation [37]. The need for oxygenation may also require an active perfusion system when dealing with longer in vitro maturation intervals.

Diffusion across the biomaterial during 3-D culture is controlled by creating specific pore sizes [42]. The mechanical properties of the biomaterial, such as viscosity and its ability to be molded also contribute to its usefulness for follicle culture and are dependent on molecular weight [43].

Another important attribute is the biomaterial's rigidity, also referred to as shear modulus. The shear modulus of a biomaterial is a mathematical description of its elastic properties-that is its ability to resist deformation with the application of a force. Biomaterial rigidity and its effect on follicle diameter, theca formation, antrum formation, estradiol production, and rate of meiotic resumption (GVBD and metaphase II oocyte formation) can all be used to compare outcomes with follicle encapsulation in 3-D culture models [4446].

The ideal biomaterial for in vitro follicle maturation would also be one that could mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) found within the ovary [47]. It has been suggested that since ovarian stromal composition can vary, the selected ECM for follicle culture should ideally share the inherent properties of the particular species being cultured [48].

A final consideration is whether to individually or co-culture follicles. Culturing follicles in clusters allows sharing of autocrine/paracrine secretions, increasing follicle-to-follicle communication and possibly enhancing the culture environment [49]. However, some disadvantages of co-culture systems include the potential sharing of growth-inhibiting hormones, like AMH (anti-Mullerian hormone), amongst follicles [50]. Also co-culture can interfere with the monitoring, tracking and harvesting of individual follicles during the maturation process.

Current 3-D culture models

In situ culture

In vitro culture of ovarian tissue pieces as a technique for in situ 3-D follicle maturation has not been very effective. While primordial follicle growth can be supported in this manner, development of follicles past the pre-antral stage is inhibited. To obtain complete in vitro maturation of follicles and the release of a metaphase II oocyte it is necessary to remove the follicle from the ovarian cortex [51, 52]. Two-step culture systems in which follicles are first grown from the primordial stage in situ and then mechanically or enzymatically isolated and grown in vitro have been investigated with mouse as well as human ovarian tissue [49, 51]. Models for human in vitro follicle maturation from primordial or even pre-antral stages to a mature oocyte are still in the early phase. Recently, Li and colleagues were able to induce maturation of primordial follicles in ovarian tissue fragments from cancer patients. Human ovarian tissue fragments were treated with PTEN gene inhibitor and transplanted to immunodeficient mice [53]. The PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) gene plays a pivotal role in cell regulation and apoptosis. Interestingly, in this study, inhibition of the PTEN gene allowed primordial follicles to advance to the pre-ovulatory stage. The ability to activate dormant ovarian follicles may play a pivotal role in establishing a successful in vitro culture model for maturing primordial follicles. A much deeper understanding of factors regulating human folliculogenesis is still needed to successfully mature human follicles to the Graafian stage and to be able to assess fertilization potential. Progress in this arena may well depend on establishing adequate 3-D culture systems that preserve the normal follicular architecture and allow extended in vitro culture intervals.

Matrices for follicle culture

Synthetic and biologic matrices for the support of follicle growth and maturation have been studied in several animal models as well as in humans. Table 1 presents various 3-D systems and matrices that have been applied to the culture of rodent pre-antral follicles. Table 2 summarizes 3-D culture models for follicles from larger animals, primates and humans.
Table 1

Studies examining matrices for 3-D culture of pre-antral ovarian follicles from rodents

Author

Year

System

Description

Species

Culture

Period

Initial Follicle

Diameter

Survival rate

(%)

GVBD

(%)

MII Formation

(%)

Additional Outcomes/

Observations

Jin

et al.

[102]

2010

In situ culture followed by encapsulation of follicles in 0.25% ALG-alginate or FA-fibrin alginate

Mouse

In situ:

4 days

Alginate: 12 days

NA

Alginate: 69.6%

FA: 75%

Alginate: 75%

FA: 86%

(from follicles with antrum formation)

Alginate: 61.3 ± 2.4

FA: 88 ± 8.7

(from oocytes undergoing GVBD)

Formation of 2 cell embryos

Alginate: 33%

FA: 54 ± %

Xu

et al.

[73]

2009

Fresh follicles (Foll) and cryopreserved (Cryo-Foll) and crypreserved ovarian tissue (Cryo-OV)

ALG-alginate (0.25%)

Mouse

12 days

100-130 μm

Fresh-Foll 78%

Cryo-Foll 74%

Cryo-OV 72%

Fresh-Foll: 83%

Cryo-Foll 69%

Cryo-OV: 92%

Fresh-Foll:59%

Cryo-Foll: 64%

Cryo-Ov 68%

Gap junction protein, connexin expression also studied-down regulated after cryopreservation

Shikanov

et al.

[103]

2009

ALG (0.25%)

FA fibrin alginate

Mouse

12 days

100-130 μm

ALG:78%

FA:77-81%

ALG:88%

FA: 72-88%

ALG:67%

FA:75-82%

NA

West

et al.

[45]

2007

ALG (0.7%, 1.5%, 3%)

Mouse

8-12 days

100-130 μm

150-180 μm

100-130 μm 15-42%

150-180 um 83-91%

100-130 μm 31-66%

150-180 um 46-91%

NA

Low matrix stiffness increase growth, antrum, GVBD and E2

Kreeger

et al.

[75]

2006

Tested alginate with ECM

2 versus multi-layer follicles

ALG alginate alone (1.5%)

CI collagen I

FN fibronectin

RGD peptides

CIV collagen IV

LN laminin

Mouse

8 days

100-130 μm

versus

150-180 μm

ALG 64% vs 69%

CI 65% vs 67%

FN 70% vs 72%

RGD 72% vs 62%

CIV 72% vs 48%

LN 63% vs 61%

ALG 12% vs 38%

CI 18% vs 25%

FN 23% vs 17%

RGD 13% vs 36%

CIV 20% vs 36%

LN 29% vs 11%

ALG 40%

CI 44%

FN 71%

RGD 65%

CIV 50%

LN 71%

*Multi-layer follicles

Transition to secondary Follicle promoted by CI and RGD

MII formation promoted by:

FN, RGD, LN

Xu

et al.

[39]

2006

ALG (1.5%)

Mouse

8 days

150-180 μm

93%

82%

71%

Live births of pups

Xu

et al.

[46]

2006

ALG (0.25%, 0.5%,1%.1.5%)

Mouse

12 days

100-130 μm

74-85%

78-88%

56-67%

Decreasing 2-cell and blast with increasing % ALG

Heise

et al.

[36]

2005

ALG (1%)

Encapsulation with or without FSH in gel medium

Rat

72 hrs

150-160 um

NA

NA

NA

Inclusion FSH with ALG and culture medium, Follicle diameter increased by 33%

Mousset-Simeon

et al.

[26]

2005

Microdrops under oil

Agar Millicell-CM membrane insert

Mouse

12 days

100-130 μm

Microdrops 72%

Membrane 46%

Agar 30%

Microdrops 63%

Membrane 33%

Agar 26%

Microdrops 53%, Membrane 56% Agar 13%

2-D Microdrop high survival.

Maturation rate similar to 3-D on membrane

Kreeger

et al.

[71]

2005

Compared effects two versus multi-layered follicles

ALG(1.5%)-Collagen I matrix FSH 5-50 mIU/ml

Mouse

8 days

100-130 μm

150-180 μm

66-77%

30-72%

21-27%

9-43%

Multi-layer follicles

40-78%

Hormone secretion (E2 and progesterone) in multi-layer follicles FSH dependent

Loret de Mola

et al.

[63]

2004

Collagen treated membrane Collagen gel encapsulation

Mouse

10 days

118 μm

Membrane 55%

Collagen gel 15%

NA

Membrane 17%

Collagen gel 19%

*Based on number of recovered eggs

Follicle size larger in collagen gel but maturation and rate of 2-cell formation not enhanced

Adam

et al.

[25]

2004

Microdrops under oil

Millicell-CM membrane insert

Mouse

6 days

150-174 μm

175-200 μm

Microdrops 77%

Membrane 83%

NA

Membrane 79%

Membrane insert

Fert rate 75%, blast rate 48%

Pangas

et al.

[70]

2003

Alginate

Mouse

10 days

82 μm

68%

NA

40%

TEM indicate follicles in ALG maintained ultrastructure

Gomes

et al.

[62]

1999

Collagen gel encapsulation

Mouse

6 days

135 μm

NA

NA

NA

Follicle volume and response to FSH increased with 3-D culture in collagen

Nayudu

et al.

[54]

1992

Millicell-CM membrane insert

Mouse

6-7 days

3-5 days

125-150 μm

150-180 μm

NA

NA

NA

FSH stimulated growth, antrum formation, E2 dose response to FSH levels

Torrance

et al.

[61]

1989

Collagen gel encapsulation

Mouse

14 days

20-95 μm

36%

NA

NA

Growth to multi-laminar stage but no antrum formation

NA: Not available

Table 2

Summary of 3-D culture studies with follicles from human, primate and large domestic animal species

Author

Year

System

Description

Species

Culture

Period

Initial

Follicle

Diameter

Final

Diameter

Survival

Rate

Antrum

Formation

Observations/Conclusions

Amorim

et al.

[72]

2009

Alginate (ALG)1%

Human

7 days

34-52 μm

44--70 μm

90%

NA

Alginate culture system supported growth of Isolated follicles from frozen-thawed ovary

Xu

et al.

[67]

2009

Alginate 0.5%

Matrigel embedded

Human

30 days

~175 μm

715 μm

NA

75%

Both 3-D systems supported growth of isolated human follicles

Xu

et al.

[48]

2009

Alginate (ALG) 0.25% versus 0.5%

Rhesus monkey

30 days

100-300 μm

20 vs 78%

60 vs 78%

Yes

Higher ALG better survival and growth. LH addition with FSH negative effect on survival and P4 secretion

Itoh

et al.

[104]

2002

Collagen gel

Cow

13 days

145-170 μm

304 μm

NA

Yes

Serum-free culture. Insulin, FSH and LH together induced earlier antrum formation

Abir

et al.

[51]

2001

Collagen gel

Human

24 hours

35-45 μm

70 μm

NA

NA

Collagen matrix supported growth of fully isolated follicles but not tissue slice with partially isolated follicles

Hovatta

et al.

[49]

1999

In situ and partially isolated follicles

Millicell + Matrigel

Human

~28 days

total

NA

NA

NA

No

Tissue slices better less oocyte extrusion than collagenese isolated. Four weeks to reach secondary stage

Yamamoto

et al.

[105]

1999

Collagen gel

Cow

14 days

500-700 μm

NA

37%

Yes

MII 27%, 42% fertilization, 4% blastocyst

One live birth.

Hiraoi

et al.

[106]

1994

Collagen gel

Pig

16 days

220-300 μm

NA

NA

Yes

40% MII formation in oocytes ≥110 μm

No MII from oocytes <110 μm. Oocytes capable of being fertilized

Roy and Treacy

[107]

1993

Agar

Human

5 days

90-220 μm

NA

NA

Yes

FSH induced antrum formation, hormone secretion. No FSH, no E2 secretion

All of the matrices adopted for 3-D culture essentially permit spherical growth of the follicle, preserving the physical integrity of granulosa cell and oocyte's interaction. Nayadu et al [54] accomplished this using a Millicell hydrophobic insert. The non-tissue culture treated surface prevented granulosa cell migration that could disrupt follicle architecture.

A variety of optically clear gels have also been applied towards follicle culture in different animal models. Follicles have either been completely encapsulated to create a 3-D environment or grown on a gel membrane with medium bathing both surfaces to simulate 3-D culture. Gels that have been used for tissue engineering include hydrogels like agar/agarose, calcium alginate, and hyaluronan, all from naturally derived polymers, as well as synthetic polymers such as poly (ethylene glycol) and poly (vinyl alcohol) (reviewed in [21, 55]). Gels containing collagen alone as well as compounds containing collagen in combination with ECM proteins have also been applied to in vitro follicle growth. The physical characteristics of each of these matrices permit physical expansion of the follicular unit during growth.

Hydrogels contain polymers that cross-link or self-assemble into hydrophilic structures. The 3-D cross-linking is what gives the gel its stiffness. The temperature and conditions for this cross-linking can be a critical factor in determining subsequent development of the follicle. For instance agar, derived from seaweed, requires exposure to elevated non-physiologic temperatures for melting before the cross-linking or gelling step, potentially damaging the follicle [56]. Higher rates of atresia were observed in follicles grown on agar as compared to those placed in microdrop culture or in 3-D culture on a hydrophobic membrane insert [26]. In contrast, Huanmin et al. (2000) described active follicular growth and antrum formation with caprine follicles embedded within agar [57]. Their data did however show that secondary follicles survived better than primary follicles in this 3-D agar culture system. Agar embedding has also been applied to human and hamster pre-antral follicles [58, 59]. Follicles were biologically competent, secreting steroids and synthesizing DNA. Low melting point agarose may be a better matrix for follicle embedding, permitting encapsulation at temperatures more conducive to continued cell growth.

Collagen, a protein found in fibers of connective tissue, is rich in glycine and proline and can be hydrolyzed in to a gel by boiling. This biomaterial has been widely applied to follicular culture. Eppig and colleagues used collagen membrane inserts as substrata in an attempt to simulate 3-D follicle culture. The membrane inserts with follicles were suspended in wells, and follicles were exposed to culture medium from below as well as above [13, 60]. The biomaterial was not tissue culture treated. It did however allow follicle attachment but minimized granulosa cell migration. In vitro follicle maturation resulted in the formation of metaphase II oocytes, with the capability of producing live young after in vitro fertilization, growth and transfer to foster mothers. Despite this achievement, follicle growth on collagen treated membranes had limited potential in terms of maintaining spheroid follicle structure and follicles were susceptible to flattening over time in culture and to premature oocyte ovulation.

To create a more spatially uniform 3-D culture system, follicles have also been embedded in collagen gel [6164]. Spontaneous follicle disruption as a result of discontinuous or distorted basal lamina and granulosa cell migration was decreased in the 3-D collagen system compared to control 2-D culture systems [62]. Follicle growth rate has also been reported to be superior [63]. Granulosa-cell oocyte complexes embedded in collagen matrix remained rounded and compacted with neuronal-like outgrowths towards the oocytes [64]. Two limitations of the collagen gel have however been noted. The collagen gel is susceptible to shrinkage over time, affecting the gel's natural properties as well as reducing visibility during microscopic assessment [61]. Also, follicle extraction from the collagen requires enzymatic digestion of the gel, with the potential for subsequent damage to the oocyte [65].

The natural scaffolding upon which cells are organized in vivo, known as the extracellular matrix (ECM), is composed of collagen, along with laminin and fibronectin. ECM has been shown to play an important role in regulating cell behavior, differentiation and secretory activity (reviewed in [30]). One commercially available ECM tested for follicle growth is matrigel [49, 66, 67]. This ECM product is derived from the Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm (EHS) mouse sarcoma. Matrigel is composed of collagen IV, laminin, fibronectin, entactin, heparin sulfate proteoglycans, and a variety of growth factors such as EGF, FGF, IGF-1, PDGF and TGF-β [68, 69]. Murine pre-antral follicles in 3-D culture in matrigel exhibited higher growth and survival rates than those in conventional culture [28]. Hovatta et al demonstrated higher survival of follicles in frozen-thawed human ovarian tissue placed in culture on matrigel coated inserts [29, 49]. Autocrine and paracrine signaling by ECM molecules and associated growth factors likely affect folliculogenesis. The interactions between ECM proteins and follicles from different animal models needs to be further studied. The source and type of ECM could also play a role in regulating follicle growth during 3-D culture. The size of ECM molecules can present problems and an alternative solution has been to adsorb known sequences of matrix peptides, such as RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) or laminin-derived peptide sequences on to synthetic matrices (reviewed in [30]).

To date the most widely applied system for follicle encapsulation and 3-D culture has been alginate produced by brown algae [39, 45, 46, 48, 67, 7073]. Alginate in the presence of calcium crosslinks to form a hydrogel. This property facilitates encapsulation of follicles under physiologic conditions. Pangas et al. (2003) first applied this system to the 3-D culture of granulosa-cell oocyte complexes (GOC) from 12-day old mouse pre-antral follicles [70]. GOCs were embedded in alginate beads ranging in size from 0.5 to 1 mm in diameter. Light microscopic and TEM ultra-structure studies suggested that the alginate did not interfere with oocyte or granulosa cell growth development over a 10 day culture interval. Moreover, oocytes recovered from the encapsulated GOCs were able to resume meiosis, undergo fertilization and produce viable offspring [39]. This 3-D system has also been applied to secondary follicles. Follicles embedded in alginate hydrogels responded to FSH stimulation in a dose-dependent fashion, secreting estradiol and progesterone [71]. Alginate matrix stiffness and density can affect secondary follicle expansion, hormone production and oocyte maturation [45, 46]. Non-human primate follicles have also been successfully cultured in calcium alginate gels for up to 30 days [48]. The encapsulated monkey pre-antral follicles secreted estrogen, progesterone and androstenedione and responded to FSH in the culture milieu. Interestingly, follicles cultured in 0.5% alginate performed better than those in 0.25% alginate, suggesting that primate follicles may require more physical support. One concern however is that denser matrices could potentially limit access to hormones and other nutrients. Heise et al. (2005) reported inhibited delivery of FSH to micro-encapsulated follicles [36]. Follicle diameters increased with inclusion of FSH in the hydrogel but still did not reach that observed in un-encapsulated controls. Clearly, the physical attributes of the 3-D matrix selected for follicle culture needs to be tailored towards the species and follicle stage being cultured.

In humans, pre-antral follicle growth in vitro offers an avenue through which cryopreserved ovarian tissue can be utilized without the need for transplantation. Human follicles isolated from fresh or cryopreserved ovarian tissue have been successfully cultivated in calcium alginate hydrogels but functionality needs to be further characterized [72]. Initial data with frozen mouse ovarian tissue certainly suggests that meiotically competent oocytes can be recovered after in vitro maturation of isolated follicles in this 3-D culture system [73].

To further simulate the in vivo environment, ECM molecules have been combined with calcium alginate to construct synthetic ECM matrices for 3D culture [74]. The adhesion peptide sequence arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) common to ECM proteins has been synthetically created and coupled to calcium alginate to construct such a synthetic matrix for follicle growth. Hormone secretion by follicles was directly related to adhesion peptide concentration and a three-fold increase in progesterone and estradiol secretion could be induced by adjusting matrix parameters. In a separate study, these investigators combined calcium alginate with additional ECM components such as collagen I, collagen IV, laminin and fibronectin [75]. Matrix effect on growth from two-layered to multi-layered follicles as well as oocyte maturation to metaphase II was compared. Transition to the multi-layered, secondary follicle was enhanced in alginate matrices with RGD or collagen I. Final maturation of oocytes and resumption of meiosis was promoted by presence of fibronectin, laminin or RGD peptide.

Criteria for biomaterial evaluation

Increasing follicular diameter is typically used as a measure of follicle maturation. During in vitro growth, especially in traditional 2-D culture systems where there is granulosa cell expansion, an increase in horizontal diameter of the follicle does not necessarily correlate to overall follicular growth [62]. With 3-D culture the biomaterial presents equal counter-forces in all directions, minimizing flattening and allowing equal growth along all axes. Follicle volume as well as diameter should therefore be taken into account when comparing different substrata.

Another outcome measure indicative of follicle functionality and growth is antrum formation. This accumulation of fluid within the follicle complex has been shown to vary with 2- versus 3-D culture systems, as well as the biomaterial used for follicle encapsulation. The shear elastic modulus and diffusion characteristics of the biomaterial must be carefully balanced. Torrance et al. (1989) noted no antrum formation in follicles cultured in collagen, despite an apparent increase in follicular diameter over the 14 day culture interval. It was suggested that the double gelling of the collagen during follicle encapsulation allowed just enough flexibility for some granulosa cell proliferation, but that the overall high shear elastic modulus (increased stiffness) inhibited antrum formation [61]. Interestingly, this was not observed when follicles were individually cultured in collagen microbeads [76].

A relationship between decreased gel stiffness and greater antrum formation was also observed with calcium alginate hydrogel when tested at concentrations of 3%, 1.5% and 0.7% [45]. The study of Xu et al. (2006) most clearly illustrates the opposing influences of the rigidity of the biomaterial at high gel concentration and its interference with diffusion and optimal growth [46]. Oocytes obtained from follicles encapsulated in 0.25% alginate had a higher developmental capacity than those cultured in 1.5% alginate. In vitro maturation and fertilization of oocytes in 0.25% vs 1.5% calcium alginate were significantly higher (41% vs 5%, respectively). Moreover oocytes derived from the stiffer gel were clearly impaired and unable to undergo in vitro blastulation [46].

Interestingly, follicles from primates showed the opposite relationship between gel rigidity and follicle growth. Follicle survival and diameter were increased with culture in 0.5% calcium alginate as compared to 0.25% [48]. Ovarian stroma of primates is more rigid than that found in rodents and it has been suggested that perhaps primate as well as human follicles may require a stiffer biomaterial to optimize in vitro culture and growth. The 100% survival rate and 75% antrum formation observed with human secondary follicles grown in 3-D culture in 0.5% calcium alginate matrix further support this supposition [67].

Non-gel culture systems

Despite the aforementioned benefits of follicle encapsulation as a model for 3-D culture, there are also difficulties. The process of encapsulation as well as the removal of follicles from the gel can be problematic, sometimes resulting in loss of healthy follicles [61, 63, 65].

Alternatives methods for 3-D culture of follicles that do not involve encapsulation have therefore also been explored. Suspension culture of follicles in orbiting test tubes [36, 37, 77], rotating-wall vessels [77], and roller bottle systems [23] can maintain the 3-D morphology of the follicles without encapsulation. Unfortunately these systems have not been extremely effective. The rate of rotation necessary to keep the follicles from descending to the bottom of the vessels imposes shear stress on the follicles causing follicle degeneration [77]. Moreover, the only way to negate this effect was to encapsulate the follicles before subjecting them to suspension culture with rotation [37, 77].

Suspension culture in rotating systems with its accompanying shear stress resulted in more follicle loss than that observed with embedding and removal of follicles from gels. Follicle survival with culture in a rotating-wall culture vessel was only 9% [77] as compared to the 15% observed after embedding and removal from collagen gel culture [63]. With marsupial follicles, survival rate in the roller culture system was higher; nearly 49%, but follicles exhibited no antrum formation [23].

Other non-gel approaches have included serial culture of follicles in new wells each day to prevent attachment [78] and flattening, or culture in simple microdrop under an oil overlay [79]. Inverted microdrop suspension culture has also been tested as a means to maintain the 3-D architecture of follicles [23, 80]. Follicles are placed in microdrops under oil on the bottom of a tissue culture plate and then hung upside down during culture. Oil is ideally suited as a biomaterial for micro-culture environments, allowing maintenance of pH and temperature around the follicle and free gas exchange [81]. However, its hydrophobic properties could potentially allow the escape of lipid soluble follicle secretions and growth factors in to the oil layer, ultimately hindering growth [82]. It should however be noted that while inverted suspension culture yielded survival rates similar to that observed with alginate gels, the meiotic maturation rate was only 10% [23], far less than that what has been achieved with gel encapsulation of follicles [26, 39, 70]. Handling large numbers of follicles in inverted suspension culture would also be a delicate and labor intensive process. This method would be especially unsuitable for follicles from the human ovary, which might require as long as three months of culture.

Microfluidic culture

The final aspect of follicle culture that needs some attention is the development of culture vessels or systems that maximize diffusion of nutrients and gases through the selected biomaterial while allowing retention of the delicate micro-environment of the follicle and the concentration of essential trophic factors around the oocyte. To accurately mimic the in vivo ovarian environment, fluid flow across the encapsulated follicle is vital. Also, within the ovarian environment follicles are grown in close proximity of each other, allowing sharing and concentration of secreted factors. The logistics of co-culturing numerous encapsulated follicles can perhaps be aided by the use of microfluidics that allow precise control and manipulation of fluids using microchannels. Microchannels increase the surface area-to-volume (SAV) ratio, implementing laminar fluid flow [83](reviewed in [84]).

Diffusion across biomaterials has been shown to be influenced by not only the biomaterial and its concentration but also by its shape or presentation. Encapsulating in microbeads of gel may allow more uniform diffusion across all surfaces as compared to culture with follicles embedded in a single continuous layer of gel. Survival and antrum formation by cultured pre-antral buffalo follicles was demonstrated to be better after culture in collagen microbeads as compared to a continuous layer of collagen matrix [76]. Tiny microbeads containing follicles in a biomatrix, combined with a system of microchannels could be used to create a network of individual follicles sharing nutrients. A dynamic medium exchange could therefore be applied to follicle culture in a manner that avoids the shear stress observed with rotating culture systems and preserves a "co-culture" atmosphere.

A variety of microfluidic culture systems have been described. Cell immobilization with continuous media flow is the common goal. This can be accomplished with microposts on the culture surface to entrap cells and create a matrix support while still allowing laminar flow of fluid to pass by [85, 86] or by entrapping cells between walls of PDMS with continuous flow of culture medium above the cells [83]. Microwells can also be used as architectural supports in microfluidic systems and act as nests for cells to culture in while fluid is exchanged above or below [87, 88]. Microfluidics in combination with valves and micro-scale pumps provide the option of continuous media flow in ways similar to that seen in vivo[89, 90]. Microfluidics thus permits dynamic culture conditions and medium flow without disturbing the cell itself.

Application of microfluidics to the field of reproductive biology has gained much attention. It has been applied to sperm sorting [91, 92], oocyte handling and fertilization [9396] and embryo culture [83, 97101]. Follicle culture in microfluidic devices needs to be explored. This type of system may be ideal for providing the 3-D environment necessary for maintaining follicle architecture over long intervals in culture, allowing adequate oxygenation and nutrient exchange and at the same time permitting sequestration of autocrine/paracrine factors within the vicinity of the growing follicle. The ideal microfluidic model would allow monitoring and harvest of individual follicle but also a sharing of the microenvironment to attain the benefit of "co-culture".

Conclusion

In conclusion, a review of the literature suggests that 3-D culture of encapsulated follicles offers much promise. Further study and selection of the appropriate biomaterial with the chemical and physical properties necessary for follicle handling and growth will be a key to making advances in this field. The combination of synthetic ECM matrices with a microfluidics model may be necessary to further simulate the in vivo environment and improve in vitro follicle maturation, especially in the human.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cleveland Clinic Fertility Center, Department of OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
(2)
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation

References

  1. Santos MA, Kuijk EW, Macklon NS: The impact of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the developing embryo. Reproduction. 2010, 139: 23-34. 10.1530/REP-09-0187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Smitz J, Dolmans MM, Donnez J, Fortune JE, Hovatta O, Jewgenow K, Picton HM, Plancha C, Shea LD, Stouffer RL: Current achievements and future research directions in ovarian tissue culture, in vitro follicle development and transplantation: implications for fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Update. 2010, 16: 395-414. 10.1093/humupd/dmp056.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gook DA, Edgar DH, Stern C: Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004, 113 (Suppl 1): S41-44. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll J, Gosden RG: Transplantation of frozen-thawed mouse primordial follicles. Hum Reprod. 1993, 8: 1163-1167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hovatta O: Cryopreservation and culture of human ovarian cortical tissue containing early follicles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004, 113 (Suppl 1): S50-54. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Picton HM, Harris SE, Muruvi W, Chambers EL: The in vitro growth and maturation of follicles. Reproduction. 2008, 136: 703-715. 10.1530/REP-08-0290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker TG: A Quantitative and Cytological Study of Germ Cells in Human Ovaries. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1963, 158: 417-433. 10.1098/rspb.1963.0055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Abir R, Nitke S, Ben-Haroush A, Fisch B: In vitro maturation of human primordial ovarian follicles: clinical significance, progress in mammals, and methods for growth evaluation. Histol Histopathol. 2006, 21: 887-898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gosden RG, Boland NI, Spears N, Murray AA, Chapman M, Wade JC, Zohdy NI, Brown N: The biology and technology of follicular oocyte development in vitro. Reprod Med Rev. 1993, 2: 129-152. 10.1017/S0962279900000685.Google Scholar
  10. Griffin J, Emery BR, Huang I, Peterson CM, Carrell DT: Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human). J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2006, 3: 2-10.1186/1743-1050-3-2.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carabatsos MJ, Sellitto C, Goodenough DA, Albertini DF: Oocyte-granulosa cell heterologous gap junctions are required for the coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic meiotic competence. Dev Biol. 2000, 226: 167-179. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Simon AM, Goodenough DA, Li E, Paul DL: Female infertility in mice lacking connexin 37. Nature. 1997, 385: 525-529. 10.1038/385525a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eppig JJ, Schroeder AC: Capacity of mouse oocytes from preantral follicles to undergo embryogenesis and development to live young after growth, maturation, and fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1989, 41: 268-276. 10.1095/biolreprod41.2.268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Herlands RL, Schultz RM: Regulation of mouse oocyte growth: probable nutritional role for intercellular communication between follicle cells and oocytes in oocyte growth. J Exp Zool. 1984, 229: 317-325. 10.1002/jez.1402290217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Murray A, Spears N: Follicular development in vitro. Semin Reprod Med. 2000, 18: 109-122. 10.1055/s-2000-12550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Diaz FJ, Wigglesworth K, Eppig JJ: Oocytes are required for the preantral granulosa cell to cumulus cell transition in mice. Dev Biol. 2007, 305: 300-311. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.02.019.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Buccione R, Schroeder AC, Eppig JJ: Interactions between somatic cells and germ cells throughout mammalian oogenesis. Biol Reprod. 1990, 43: 543-547. 10.1095/biolreprod43.4.543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Su YQ, Sugiura K, Eppig JJ: Mouse oocyte control of granulosa cell development and function: paracrine regulation of cumulus cell metabolism. Semin Reprod Med. 2009, 27: 32-42. 10.1055/s-0028-1108008.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Eppig JJ, Pendola FL, Wigglesworth K, Pendola JK: Mouse oocytes regulate metabolic cooperativity between granulosa cells and oocytes: amino acid transport. Biol Reprod. 2005, 73: 351-357. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.041798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eppig JJ: Intercommunication between mammalian oocytes and companion somatic cells. Bioessays. 1991, 13: 569-574. 10.1002/bies.950131105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. West ER, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: Engineering the follicle microenvironment. Semin Reprod Med. 2007, 25: 287-299. 10.1055/s-2007-980222.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gougeon A: Dynamics of follicular growth in the human: a model from preliminary results. Hum Reprod. 1986, 1: 81-87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nation A, Selwood L: The production of mature oocytes from adult ovaries following primary follicle culture in a marsupial. Reproduction. 2009, 138: 247-255. 10.1530/REP-09-0028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC: In-vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo development of immature oocytes from early preantral follicles from prepuberal mice in a simplified culture system. Hum Reprod. 1996, 11: 2656-2666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Adam AA, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Nagano M: In vitro culture of mouse preantral follicles using membrane inserts and developmental competence of in vitro ovulated oocytes. J Reprod Dev. 2004, 50: 579-586. 10.1262/jrd.50.579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mousset-Simeon N, Jouannet P, Le Cointre L, Coussieu C, Poirot C: Comparison of three in vitro culture systems for maturation of early preantral mouse ovarian follicles. Zygote. 2005, 13: 167-175. 10.1017/S0967199405003151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Eppig JJ, O'Brien MJ: Development in vitro of mouse oocytes from primordial follicles. Biol Reprod. 1996, 54: 197-207. 10.1095/biolreprod54.1.197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Oktem O, Oktay K: The role of extracellular matrix and activin-A in in vitro growth and survival of murine preantral follicles. Reprod Sci. 2007, 14: 358-366. 10.1177/1933719107303397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hovatta O, Silye R, Abir R, Krausz T, Winston RM: Extracellular matrix improves survival of both stored and fresh human primordial and primary ovarian follicles in long-term culture. Hum Reprod. 1997, 12: 1032-1036. 10.1093/humrep/12.5.1032.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Berkholtz CB, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: Extracellular matrix functions in follicle maturation. Semin Reprod Med. 2006, 24: 262-269. 10.1055/s-2006-948555.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Figueiredo JR, Hulshof SC, Thiry M, Van den Hurk R, Bevers MM, Nusgens B, Beckers JF: Extracellular matrix proteins and basement membrane: their identification in bovine ovaries and significance for the attachment of cultured preantral follicles. Theriogenology. 1995, 43: 845-858. 10.1016/0093-691X(95)00036-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Weaver VM, Fischer AH, Peterson OW, Bissell MJ: The importance of the microenvironment in breast cancer progression: recapitulation of mammary tumorigenesis using a unique human mammary epithelial cell model and a three-dimensional culture assay. Biochem Cell Biol. 1996, 74: 833-851. 10.1139/o96-089.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bissell MJ, Rizki A, Mian IS: Tissue architecture: the ultimate regulator of breast epithelial function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003, 15: 753-762. 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.016.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hwa AJ, Fry RC, Sivaraman A, So PT, Samson LD, Stolz DB, Griffith LG: Rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells survive without exogenous VEGF in 3D perfused co-cultures with hepatocytes. Faseb J. 2007, 21: 2564-2579. 10.1096/fj.06-7473com.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffith LG, Swartz MA: Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 211-224. 10.1038/nrm1858.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Heise M, Koepsel R, Russell AJ, McGee EA: Calcium alginate microencapsulation of ovarian follicles impacts FSH delivery and follicle morphology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005, 3: 47-10.1186/1477-7827-3-47.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Heise MK, Koepsel R, McGee EA, Russell AJ: Dynamic Oxygen Enhances Oocyte Maturation in Long-Term Follicle Culture. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2009Google Scholar
  38. DePaola N, Davies PF, Pritchard WF, Florez L, Harbeck N, Polacek DC: Spatial and temporal regulation of gap junction connexin43 in vascular endothelial cells exposed to controlled disturbed flows in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 3154-3159. 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3154.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu M, Kreeger PK, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: Tissue-engineered follicles produce live, fertile offspring. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12: 2739-2746. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2739.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McGee EA, Hsueh AJ: Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr Rev. 2000, 21: 200-214. 10.1210/er.21.2.200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. van Wezel IL, Rodgers RJ: Morphological characterization of bovine primordial follicles and their environment in vivo. Biol Reprod. 1996, 55: 1003-1011. 10.1095/biolreprod55.5.1003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Eiselt P, Yeh J, Latvala RK, Shea LD, Mooney DJ: Porous carriers for biomedical applications based on alginate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2000, 21: 1921-1927. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00033-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wee S, Gombotz WR: Protein release from alginate matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998, 31: 267-285. 10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00124-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kong HJ, Kaigler D, Kim K, Mooney DJ: Controlling rigidity and degradation of alginate hydrogels via molecular weight distribution. Biomacromolecules. 2004, 5: 1720-1727. 10.1021/bm049879r.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. West ER, Xu M, Woodruff TK, Shea LD: Physical properties of alginate hydrogels and their effects on in vitro follicle development. Biomaterials. 2007, 28: 4439-4448. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu M, West E, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: Identification of a stage-specific permissive in vitro culture environment for follicle growth and oocyte development. Biol Reprod. 2006, 75: 916-923. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.054833.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Abbott A: Cell culture: biology's new dimension. Nature. 2003, 424: 870-872. 10.1038/424870a.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu M, West-Farrell ER, Stouffer RL, Shea LD, Woodruff TK, Zelinski MB: Encapsulated three-dimensional culture supports development of nonhuman primate secondary follicles. Biol Reprod. 2009, 81: 587-594. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.074732.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hovatta O, Wright C, Krausz T, Hardy K, Winston RM: Human primordial, primary and secondary ovarian follicles in long-term culture: effect of partial isolation. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14: 2519-2524. 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Durlinger AL, Kramer P, Karels B, de Jong FH, Uilenbroek JT, Grootegoed JA, Themmen AP: Control of primordial follicle recruitment by anti-Mullerian hormone in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 1999, 140: 5789-5796. 10.1210/en.140.12.5789.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Abir R, Fisch B, Nitke S, Okon E, Raz A, Ben Rafael Z: Morphological study of fully and partially isolated early human follicles. Fertil Steril. 2001, 75: 141-146. 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01668-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Telfer EE, McLaughlin M, Ding C, Thong KJ: A two-step serum-free culture system supports development of human oocytes from primordial follicles in the presence of activin. Hum Reprod. 2008, 23: 1151-1158. 10.1093/humrep/den070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Li J, Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Liu S, Klein C, Liu S, Duan EK, Hsueh AJ: Activation of dormant ovarian follicles to generate mature eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010Google Scholar
  54. Nayudu PL, Osborn SM: Factors influencing the rate of preantral and antral growth of mouse ovarian follicles in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1992, 95: 349-362. 10.1530/jrf.0.0950349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS: Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009, 103: 655-663. 10.1002/bit.22361.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sawhney AS, Pathak CP, van Rensburg JJ, Dunn RC, Hubbell JA: Optimization of photopolymerized bioerodible hydrogel properties for adhesion prevention. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994, 28: 831-838. 10.1002/jbm.820280710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Huanmin Z, Yong Z: In vitro development of caprine ovarian preantral follicles. Theriogenology. 2000, 54: 641-650. 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00379-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Roy SK, Greenwald GS: Hormonal requirements for the growth and differentiation of hamster preantral follicles in long-term culture. J Reprod Fertil. 1989, 87: 103-114. 10.1530/jrf.0.0870103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Roy SK, Greenwald GS: Methods of separation and in-vitro culture of pre-antral follicles from mammalian ovaries. Hum Reprod Update. 1996, 2: 236-245. 10.1093/humupd/2.3.236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Eppig JJ, Telfer EE: Isolation and culture of oocytes. Methods Enzymol. 1993, 225: 77-84. full_text.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Torrance C, Telfer E, Gosden RG: Quantitative study of the development of isolated mouse pre-antral follicles in collagen gel culture. J Reprod Fertil. 1989, 87: 367-374. 10.1530/jrf.0.0870367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Gomes JE, Correia SC, Gouveia-Oliveira A, Cidadao AJ, Plancha CE: Three-dimensional environments preserve extracellular matrix compartments of ovarian follicles and increase FSH-dependent growth. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999, 54: 163-172. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199910)54:2<163::AID-MRD8>3.0.CO;2-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Loret de Mola JR, Barnhart K, Kopf GS, Heyner S, Garside W, Coutifaris CB: Comparison of two culture systems for the in-vitro growth and maturation of mouse preantral follicles. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 31: 15-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Combelles CM, Fissore RA, Albertini DF, Racowsky C: In vitro maturation of human oocytes and cumulus cells using a co-culture three-dimensional collagen gel system. Hum Reprod. 2005, 20: 1349-1358. 10.1093/humrep/deh750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Telfer E: The development of methods for isolation and culture of preantral follicles from bovine and porcine ovaries. Theriogenology. 1996, 45: 101-110. 10.1016/0093-691X(95)00359-G.Google Scholar
  66. Buyuk E: In vitro growth of mouse primary and early preantral follicles in a 3-dimensional culture system. Fertil Steril. 2003, 80: 79-10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02010-7.Google Scholar
  67. Xu M, Barrett SL, West-Farrell E, Kondapalli LA, Kiesewetter SE, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: In vitro grown human ovarian follicles from cancer patients support oocyte growth. Hum Reprod. 2009, 24 (10): 2531-40. 10.1093/humrep/dep228.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Martin GR, Timpl R: Laminin and other basement membrane components. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1987, 3: 57-85. 10.1146/annurev.cb.03.110187.000421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kleinman HK, Martin GR: Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005, 15: 378-386. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.05.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pangas SA, Saudye H, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: Novel approach for the three-dimensional culture of granulosa cell-oocyte complexes. Tissue Eng. 2003, 9: 1013-1021. 10.1089/107632703322495655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Kreeger PK, Fernandes NN, Woodruff TK, Shea LD: Regulation of mouse follicle development by follicle-stimulating hormone in a three-dimensional in vitro culture system is dependent on follicle stage and dose. Biol Reprod. 2005, 73: 942-950. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.042390.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Amorim CA, Van Langendonckt A, David A, Dolmans MM, Donnez J: Survival of human pre-antral follicles after cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, follicular isolation and in vitro culture in a calcium alginate matrix. Hum Reprod. 2009, 24: 92-99. 10.1093/humrep/den343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Xu M, Banc A, Woodruff TK, Shea LD: Secondary follicle growth and oocyte maturation by culture in alginate hydrogel following cryopreservation of the ovary or individual follicles. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009, 103: 378-386. 10.1002/bit.22250.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Kreeger PK, Woodruff TK, Shea LD: Murine granulosa cell morphology and function are regulated by a synthetic Arg-Gly-Asp matrix. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003, 205: 1-10. 10.1016/S0303-7207(03)00209-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Kreeger PK, Deck JW, Woodruff TK, Shea LD: The in vitro regulation of ovarian follicle development using alginate-extracellular matrix gels. Biomaterials. 2006, 27: 714-723. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.016.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Sharma GT, Dubey PK, Meur SK: Survival and developmental competence of buffalo preantral follicles using three-dimensional collagen gel culture system. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009, 114: 115-124. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.09.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Rowghani NM, Heise MK, McKeel D, McGee EA, Koepsel RR, Russell AJ: Maintenance of morphology and growth of ovarian follicles in suspension culture. Tissue Eng. 2004, 10: 545-552. 10.1089/107632704323061906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Boland NI, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Gosden RG: Pattern of lactate production and steroidogenesis during growth and maturation of mouse ovarian follicles in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1993, 48: 798-806. 10.1095/biolreprod48.4.798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Bishonga C, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Nagano M, Ishikawa A: In vitro growth of mouse ovarian preantral follicles and the capacity of their oocytes to develop to the blastocyst stage. J Vet Med Sci. 2001, 63: 619-624. 10.1292/jvms.63.619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Wycherley G, Downey D, Kane MT, Hynes AC: A novel follicle culture system markedly increases follicle volume, cell number and oestradiol secretion. Reproduction. 2004, 127: 669-677. 10.1530/rep.1.00040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Tae JC, Kim EY, Lee WD, Park SP, Lim JH: Sterile filtered paraffin oil supports in vitro developmental competence in bovine embryos comparable to co-culture. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006, 23: 121-127. 10.1007/s10815-006-9024-6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Miller KF, Pursel VG: Absorption of compounds in medium by the oil covering microdrop cultures. Gamete Res. 1987, 17: 57-61. 10.1002/mrd.1120170107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Beebe D, Wheeler M, Zeringue H, Walters E, Raty S: Microfluidic technology for assisted reproduction. Theriogenology. 2002, 57: 125-135. 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00662-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Suh RS, Phadke N, Ohl DA, Takayama S, Smith GD: Rethinking gamete/embryo isolation and culture with microfluidics. Hum Reprod Update. 2003, 9: 451-461. 10.1093/humupd/dmg037.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Chen X: Isolation of plasma from whole blood using a microfludic chip in a continuous cross-flow. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2009, 54: 324-327. 10.1007/s11434-008-0551-7.Google Scholar
  86. Hashimoto : Localized immobilization. Sensors and Actuators: B Chemical. 2008, 128: 545-551. 10.1016/j.snb.2007.07.065.Google Scholar
  87. Khademhosseini A, Yeh J, Eng G, Karp J, Kaji H, Borenstein J, Farokhzad OC, Langer R: Cell docking inside microwells within reversibly sealed microfluidic channels for fabricating multiphenotype cell arrays. Lab Chip. 2005, 5: 1380-1386. 10.1039/b508096g.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Moeller HC, Mian MK, Shrivastava S, Chung BG, Khademhosseini A: A microwell array system for stem cell culture. Biomaterials. 2008, 29: 752-763. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.030.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Heo YS, Cabrera LM, Song JW, Futai N, Tung YC, Smith GD, Takayama S: Characterization and resolution of evaporation-mediated osmolality shifts that constrain microfluidic cell culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) devices. Anal Chem. 2007, 79: 1126-1134. 10.1021/ac061990v.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Lee PJ, Ghorashian N, Gaige TA, Hung PJ: Microfluidic System for Automated Cell-based Assays. JALA Charlottesv Va. 2007, 12: 363-367.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Schuster TG, Cho B, Keller LM, Takayama S, Smith GD: Isolation of motile spermatozoa from semen samples using microfluidics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003, 7: 75-81. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61732-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Chung Y, Zhu X, Gu W, Smith GD, Takayama S: Microscale integrated sperm sorter. Methods Mol Biol. 2006, 321: 227-244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Sadani Z, Wacogne B, Pieralli C, Roux C, Gharbi T: Microsystems and microfluidic device for single oocyte transportation and trapping: Toward the automation of in vitro fertilising. Sensors and Actuators: A Physical. 2005, 121: 364-372. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.03.004.Google Scholar
  94. Hogan B, Beddington R, Constantini F, Lacey E: Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. 1994, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2Google Scholar
  95. Suh RS, Zhu X, Phadke N, Ohl DA, Takayama S, Smith GD: IVF within microfluidic channels requires lower total numbers and lower concentrations of sperm. Hum Reprod. 2006, 21: 477-483. 10.1093/humrep/dei323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Clark SG, Haubert K, Beebe DJ, Ferguson CE, Wheeler MB: Reduction of polyspermic penetration using biomimetic microfluidic technology during in vitro fertilization. Lab Chip. 2005, 5: 1229-1232. 10.1039/b504397m.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Glasgow IK, Zeringue HC, Beebe DJ, Choi SJ, Lyman JT, Chan NG, Wheeler MB: Handling individual mammalian embryos using microfluidics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001, 48: 570-578. 10.1109/10.918596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Raty S, Walters EM, Davis J, Zeringue H, Beebe DJ, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Wheeler MB: Embryonic development in the mouse is enhanced via microchannel culture. Lab Chip. 2004, 4: 186-190. 10.1039/b316437c.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Walters EM, Clark SG, Beebe DJ, Wheeler MB: Mammalian embryo culture in a microfluidic device. Methods Mol Biol. 2004, 254: 375-382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Walters E: Production of live piglets following in vitro embryo culture in a microfluidic environment. Theriogenology. 2007, 68: 178-189. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.050.Google Scholar
  101. Bormann C, Cabrera L, Heo Y, Takayama S, Smith G: Dynamic microfluidic embryo culture enhances blastocyst development of murine and bovine embryos. Biol Reprod. 2008, 77: 89-90.Google Scholar
  102. Jin SY, Lei L, Shikanov A, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: A novel two-step strategy for in vitro culture of early-stage ovarian follicles in the mouse. Fertil Steril. 2010, 93: 2633-2639. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.027.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Shikanov A, Xu M, Woodruff TK, Shea LD: Interpenetrating fibrin-alginate matrices for in vitro ovarian follicle development. Biomaterials. 2009, 30: 5476-5485. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.054.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Itoh T, Kacchi M, Abe H, Sendai Y, Hoshi H: Growth, antrum formation, and estradiol production of bovine preantral follicles cultured in a serum-free medium. Biol Reprod. 2002, 67: 1099-1105. 10.1095/biolreprod67.4.1099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Yamamoto K, Otoi T, Koyama N, Horikita N, Tachikawa S, Miyano T: Development to live young from bovine small oocytes after growth, maturation and fertilization in vitro. Theriogenology. 1999, 52: 81-89. 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00111-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Hirao Y, Nagai T, Kubo M, Miyano T, Miyake M, Kato S: In vitro growth and maturation of pig oocytes. J Reprod Fertil. 1994, 100: 333-339. 10.1530/jrf.0.1000333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Roy SK, Treacy BJ: Isolation and long-term culture of human preantral follicles. Fertil Steril. 1993, 59: 783-790.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Desai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement