Skip to main content

Effects of vitamin D supplementation in endometriosis: a systematic review



There is a growing body of human, animal and in vitro studies on vitamin D (vit D) substitution in endometriosis. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise and qualitatively synthesize the results of the available studies that examine the supplementation of vit D for endometriosis treatment.


A systematic search of the literature was conducted in four electronic databases (Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase) and grey literature for original research articles on humans, animals and in vitro models published in any language.


Four human studies, four animal studies and four in vitro studies were included. Quantitative synthesis of human studies showed no significant effect of vit D intake for dysmenorrhea (2 studies, 44 vit D vs 44 placebo, mean -0.71, 95% CI -1.94, 0.51) and non-cyclic pelvic pain (2 studies, 42 vit D vs 38 placebo, mean 0.34, 95% CI -0.02, 0.71). Regarding reproductive outcomes in women with endometriosis after in vitro fertilization, the only available study showed no differences between women taking vit D and women taking placebo. Three of the four included animal studies showed regression of endometriotic implants when treated with vit D. The in vitro studies demonstrated that vit D decreases invasion and proliferation of endometriotic lesions without affecting apoptosis.


Although in vitro and animal studies suggest regression of the endometriotic implants and decrease of invasion and proliferation after vit D supplementation, this was not reflected in the results of the meta-analysis, which showed no benefit of vit D supplementation in patients with endometriosis and dysmenorrhea or non-cyclic pelvic pain as well as on the outcome of IVF treatment. However, given the heterogeneity and the diversity of the available studies, more research is required to shed light on the role of vit D supplementation in women with endometriosis.


Endometriosis is an oestrogen-dependent chronic inflammatory condition, characterized by endometrium-like lesions present outside the uterine cavity [1,2,3]. It mainly affects women of reproductive age, with a referred prevalence of 5 to 10% [2]. Classic symptoms include dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility [2, 3]. The multifactorial aetiology of endometriosis has not yet been completely elucidated; the broad spectrum of multiple disease subtypes (peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, deep infiltrating endometriosis) could partially explain the discrepancies in clinical manifestations and nebulous pathophysiology [3,4,5]. Nevertheless, genetics, environmental factors, immunity and chronic inflammation have been found to be involved in its pathogenesis [1,2,3]. Many studies have reported increased inflammatory cytokines, neutrophils, macrophages, and tumour necrosis factor-a in peritoneal fluid [1, 6,7,8]. Variations in the mechanisms of inflammation could be the reason for the discrepancies concerning pain and infertility between the major subtypes of endometriosis [1]. Among the factors altering or affecting inflammation, vitamin D (vit D), has been examined in several studies in relation to endometriosis [1, 9]. Vit D sufficiency is defined as a circulating concentration > 30–40 ng/ml, insufficiency when the concentration is 20–30 ng/ml and deficiency at < 20 ng/ml. Whether the concentration of vit D (25-hydroxyvitamin-D3) is correlated with the disease and its severity is a subject of ongoing debate with studies exhibiting positive and negative associations [10,11,12,13].

Vit D’s canonical role is to regulate calcium and skeletal homeostasis, but it has also been shown to be involved in the modulation of the immune system [14]. The vit D metabolic pathway is depicted in Fig. 1 [15]. Most of the biologic actions of vit D are mediated by a high-affinity receptor acting as a transcription factor. The coding gene of vit D receptor (VDR) is located on chromosome 12 [16]. Vienonen et al[17] first reported the expression of VDR protein in the healthy human endometrium of older women with Vigano’ et al. [18] confirming later the expression in the younger cyclic endometrium. The presence of VDR in endometrium of patients with endometriosis has also been demonstrated [19]. Although VDR protein is in higher abundance in ectopic endometrium of endometriosis patients compared to controls, this study did not examine the expression in endometriotic lesions [19]. Recently, the expression of VDR has also been demonstrated in peritoneal endometriotic lesions [20]. Currently, it is unclear whether elevated endometrial VDR expression is a primary event or a consequence of endometriosis-associated inflammation. Various immune cells found in endometriosis lesions and known to maintain the disease, have been shown to express VDR and exhibit an active vit D metabolism in other systems [21]. VDR signalling may be an elusive protagonist in the pathophysiology of endometriosis creating opportunities for the development of novel therapeutic targets. The concept of vit D as an anti-endometriosis agent could therefore be considered in the course of disease treatment [21].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Vitamin D metabolic pathway. Figure’s images source: Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. UVB: ultraviolet B (UVB) rays. DBP: Vitamin D Binding Protein

The aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise and qualitatively synthesize the results of individual studies that have examined the supplementation of vit D, or relative molecules, in various levels for endometriosis treatment including in vivo or in vitro models and clinical trials.

Material and methods

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P Statement) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021265619).

Search criteria

Medline, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases were searched independently by two reviewers (DRK and IGL) until 01.11.2021. The search algorithm included combinations of the terms: vitamin D; calcitriol; cholecalciferol; endometriosis; calcium; 25(OH)D3; 25(OH)D; 1, 25(OH)2D3; vitamin D binding protein; vitamin D receptor. In addition, the references of the included studies were searched manually to identify additional publications potentially missed by the original search.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Original interventional cohort studies and RCTs with vit D supplementation in women diagnosed with endometriosis, animal models with induced endometriosis or in vitro experimental models which were published in any language until 01.11.2021 were included. Studies without supplementation of vit D, studies with dysmenorrhea or dyspareunia without histological diagnosis of endometriosis, conference abstracts, case reports and reviews were excluded.


The primary outcomes for the included human studies were changes in the level of endometriosis associated pain, both dysmenorrhea and non-cyclic pelvic pain, measured in a numerical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 and the cumulative pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes for the above studies were changes in dyspareunia and dyschezia, also measured according to a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 10.Animal and in vitro studies were evaluated for changes of biomarkers and endometriosis relevant cells after vit D treatment.

Data extraction

Relevant publications were screened independently by two reviewers (DRK, IGL) and data was extracted for each study in a standardized extraction form in an Excel spreadsheet. Where appropriate, the data set was completed through communication with the authors. Specifically, an e-mail was sent and when no answer was received, a second one followed after a two-week interval. Disagreement was resolved by consensus.

Quality assessment

Two investigators performed the risk of bias assessment of the included studies (DRK and IGL) and any discrepancies were resolved via consensus. Human studies were assessed with Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized studies [22] and animal studies with SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool [23]. For in vitro studies no standardized quality assessment tool exists.

Statistical methods

Weighted differences of the means (MD) for continuous outcomes and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all studies included in the meta-analysis [24]. I2 index was used for the heterogeneity among the outcomes of different studies [25], with I2 ≥ 50% indicating significant heterogeneity [26]. Random effects model was applied [24]. Publication bias was tested by the Harbord-Egger’s test [27]. Categorical data were analysed with chi-square test and continuous data with Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at a p-level of 0.05. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) for Mac (version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The report of the study was complemented in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) group standards for reporting meta-analysis of observational studies [28].


No ethics board approval was needed as all original data were previously published.


After screening 290 identified studies, 278 studies were excluded by reading the abstracts. Finally, four human studies, four animal studies and four in vitro studies were included (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Study flow chart

Human studies

The included four studies were randomized double blind trials comparing a group with vit D supplementation to placebo. Two of the above studies included women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis [29, 30], while the remaining studies included endometriosis patients whose diagnosis was based on their medical records [31, 32]. Groups in three of these studies consisted of women between 18 and 40 years old [29, 31, 32], while Nodler et al. [30] included young women between 12 and 25 years old.

Three studies examined the endometriosis-associated symptoms [29,30,31], while Somigliana et al. [32] examined fertility outcomes. Two studies were from Iran, one from the USA and one from Italy (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical Trials examined the impact on Vit D supplementation in women with endometriosis

Vit D was supplemented orally in all studies, but dosage varied from 600,000 IU as single administration [32], to 50,000 IU weekly [29] or every two weeks [31] for 12 weeks, to 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks [30]. In addition, follow-up varied from 3 months [31] to 6 months [30]. All of the above included human studies had an overall low risk of bias as assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized studies (Supplementary Table 2).

In all of the above studies [30,31,32], except Almassinokiani et al. [29], randomization was conducted with computer generated random numbers, power analysis was performed and allocation concealment was used. In Almassinokiani et al. a simple randomization was performed and no information about power analysis and allocation concealement was reported [29].

Endometriosis-associated symptoms

Our systematic review includes 3 randomized controled trials with 231 women with endometriosis (114 women with vit D supplementation and 117 women with placebo). Endometriosis-associated pain was the primary outcome in all of the above studies [29, 30], except Mehdizadehkashi et al. [31], in which malondialdehyde was the primary outcome and the clinical symptoms were presented as secondary outcome. The VAS was used for the assessment of the pain in all of the included studies.

The Almassinokiani et al. [29] showed that a 50,000 IU vit D weekly supplementation for 12 weeks after ablative surgery for endometriosis did not have a significant effect on dysmenorrhea (p = 0.45) and pelvic pain (p = 0.24). Another study from Iran [31] with 50,000 IU vit D supplementation every two weeks for a total of 12 weeks showed a significant improvement of dysmenorrhea (p = 0.03), without any effect on dyspareunia or dyschezia. Nodler et al. [30] found a reduction of pelvic pain in young women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis after daily administration of 2,000 IU vit D for 24 weeks, which was not significant when compared to placebo (p = 0.97). The above study did not report outcomes on dysmenorrhea.

The quantitative synthesis of the included studies showed no difference between placebo and vit D supplementation for dysmenorrhea (2 studies, 44 vit D vs 44 placebo, mean -0.71, 95% CI -1.94, 0.51) and non-cyclic pelvic pain (2 studies, 42 vit D vs 38 placebo, mean 0.34, 95% CI -0.02, 0.71) (Fig. 3). Assessment of publication bias is presented in Supplementary Material 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Quantitative synthesis results

A subgroup analysis of women deficient in vit D (< 30 ng/ml) showed significantly lower intensity of dysmenorrhoea after vit D supplementation (1 study, 25 vit D vs 25 placebo, mean -1.30, 95% CI -2.10, -0.50) [31].


The only available data for vit D supplementation in women with endometriosis aiming for pregnancy come from Somigliana et al. [32], who examined the effect of a 600,000 IU single dose of vit D in women with an initial serum level of 25(OH) D undergoing in vitro fertilization. In the endometriosis cohort (data of subgroup was provided upon communication with the corresponding author), the vit D group had similar cumulative pregnancy rate to the placebo group (p = 0.90) (38 patients with vit D, 45 patients with placebo). The estimated effect sizes for the duration of stimulation, the dosage of gonadotropins, oocytes retrieved and suitable oocytes were < 0.2, which indicates no significant difference.

Animal studies

Four animal studies, published between 2012 and 2016 were included in our review. Three studies used mouse models with surgically induced endometriosis after performing endometrium auto-transplantation to peritoneum [33,34,35] and another study used a mouse model with injection of endometrium extracted from donor mice [36]. 2 studies used intraperitoneal administration of vit D [33, 34], one oral [36] and another intramuscular administration [35]. The quality assessment of the above studies with SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool showed an overall unclear risk of bias for all the included animal studies (Supplementary Table 3).

The results of Mariani et al., which showed reduction of endometriosis development and peritoneal inflammation after the administration of elocalcitol, a synthetic derivative of vit D [36], are in concordance with two other studies which also showed regression of endometriosis after treatment with vit D [34, 35]. On the other hand, Akyol et al. did not find any difference on regression of endometriosis implants after administration of vit D [33] (Table 2).

Table 2 Studies using mouse model of endometriosis to examine the effect of Vit D supplementation

In vitro studies

Four in vitro studies exploring the effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on human endometriotic stromal cells were identified. Miyashita et al. [13] examined the in vitro effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on human endometriotic stromal cells, isolated from ovarian endometriomas. Use of 1,25(OH)2D3 reduced IL-1β-induced IL-8 mRNA expression (67.4 ± 9.4% vs. 72.1 ± 1.7%, p = 0.05), prostaglandin activity, viable endometrial stromal cell numbers and DNA synthesis, but it did not affect apoptosis when comparised to controls. Delbandi et al. [37] demonstrated that vit D increases cell adhesion and decreases invasion and proliferation of ectopic and eutopic endometrial stromal cells in vitro by reducing the production of IL-6, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and VEGF-α. Ingles et al. [38] showed that after treatment with vit D, endometriotic stroma cells have a higher CYP24A1 gene expression but decreased neuroangiogenesis, cellular motility and invasion. Yaghoubi et al. [39] found a significantly decreased expression of genes for EGF (epidermal growth factor), MDGF (monocyte/macrophage-derived growth factor) and PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor-B) in the endometriosis group but no effect in the control group when examining the impact of peritoneal fluid mononuclear cells exposure to vit D in women with and without endometriosis (Table 3).

Table 3 In vitro studies demonstrating the outcome of Vit D treatment of cells isolated from endometriosis lesions


In this meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials with a total of 314 patients with endometriosis, vit D supplementation was neither significantly associated with pelvic pain or dysmenorrhea amelioration nor did it improve fertility outcomes. No meta-analyses on this topic have been previously published.

In women with primary dysmenorrhea without the diagnosis of endometriosis different dosages (single 300.000 IU dose 5 days before menstruation [40, 41] or 50.000 IU/ weekly [42, 43]) of vit D supplementation can reduce pain intensity. A significantly greater mean decrease in pain has been also observed in a systematic meta-analysis evaluating vit D supplementation in patients with different kinds of pain (musculosceletal pain, arthritis, dysmenorrhea, migraine) xxx (mean difference -0.57, 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.15, P = 0.007) [44]. However, prior to our review it was unclear whether women diagnosed with endometriosis also benefit from vit D supplementation.

The only available randomized controlled study on vit D supplementation in a group of women with endometriosis receiving IVF did not show any significant differences for reproductive outcomes [32]. Perhaps this outcome is not surprising as previous studies in patients without the diagnosis of endometriosis showed discrepancies in the effect of vit D before ART on reproductive outcomes. Specifically, vit D supplementation of 50.000 IU weekly for 6 weeks before an embryo transfer was not associated with a significant improvement of pregnancy rates [45], while the same dose for 6 to 8 weeks was related to higher clinical pregnancy rate after ICSI in another study [46]. Interestingly, vit D in combination with different additional substances (vit E, folic acid, alpha-lactalalbumin, myo-inositol, melatonin, omega-3 and olive oil) showed some benefits in the context of IVF treatment [47,48,49].

A key observation that led to our metaanalysis is that vit D insufficiency is associated with pain severity in patients with endometriosis [11]. The mean baseline vit D concentration was higher than 30 ng/ml in Nodler et al. [30], but below this threshold in Mehdizadehkashi et al. [31] and Somigliana et al. [32]. Baseline concentrations are not reported in Almassinokiani et al. [29]. The variability regarding the status of vit D deficiency in the analysed cohorts may partly explain the discrepancies in findings. VDR polymorphisms, which play an important role in the bioavailability of vit D [50] were not assessed in the included studies and might be another reason for the different outcomes.

The characteristics of some host-related factors between the participants of the included studies which affect the metabolism and hence absorption of vit D are additional contributors to the results and should be carefully considered. For example, the mean age of the participants varied from 20 [30] to 35.6 years [31]. Back in 1978, a lower response after oral supplementation in older women in comparison to younger women was reported [50], suggesting an inadequate absorption of cholecalciferol in the older population. Mean BMI varied between 22.46 [29] and 26.2 [30] kg/m2, which could lead to lower levels of vit D due to volumetric dilution in individuals with higher BMI [51]. Gastrointestinal diseases and bariatric surgery procedures, which reduce the absorption of vit D [52], were addressed as exclusion criteria only in Nodler et al. [30].

Endometriosis heterogeneity including severity (rASRM stage of disease) and phenotypes (peritoneal endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis and ovarian endometriosis) may further explain discrepancies in pathophysiology and clinical manifestation [1]. The majority of the patients in Almassinokiani et al. [29] had rASRM stage III-IV disease but rASRM stage I-II in Nodler et al. [30], while in Mehdizadehkashi et al. [31] the rASRM stage was not reported. The different phenotypes of endometriosis were not specified in any of the included studies. Furthermore, additional hormonal treatments during or before the vit D supplementation period were not clearly described in the included studies. Only Almassinokiani et al. [29] reported that patients had a laparoscopy 24 weeks before the vit D treatment so that it is unclear if the other included studies refer to a similar study population.

Animal models have shown a significant reduction of the lesions’ size [34,35,36], possibly explained by decreased cellular motility, proliferation, and invasion [37, 38]. Unfortunately, in endometriosis research the results of animal and in vitro models are often inconsistent with the results of human studies [53]. These discrepancies are probably related to the differences between humans and animal/ in vitro models, the multifactorial nature of endometriosis and the complicated metrics of drug efficacy.

Other human studies have evaluated molecular or histological outcomes after vit D supplementation. A recent in vivo study examining CD44 expression (a protein that seems to play a role on cell adhesion) in endometrial cells of women with endometriosis showed a significant decrease after administration of oral vit D [54]. Fibrosis, which seems to play a role in endometriosis has also been shown to be reduced after vit D treatment in histological samples [34]. This could be partially explained by the reduced expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 (MMP-2, -9) [13, 35]. Finally, another beneficial impact of vit D supplementation could be a reduction of inflammation on various levels, including distinct pathways suppression [13, 37], decreased cytokine secretion [33, 35, 36] and macrophage recruitment [36].

A limitation of the review is the low number of included studies in the meta-analysis as well as their small sample size, so that the statistical power might have been inadequate to identify potential significant associations between vit D supplementation and study outcomes. The heterogeneity of the included studies regarding the baseline characteristics (age, BMI and vit D concentrations) and vit D dosages, as discussed above, represents another study limitation. Regardless of these limitations, it is pivotal to provide the scientific community with all available evidence, that can help guide clinical practice and inspire further research contributing to the unravelling of the question whether vit D supplementation can improve symptoms associated with endometriosis.


Although in vitro and animal studies seem to suggest regression of the endometriotic implants and decrease of invasion and proliferation after vit D supplementation, this was not reflected in the results of the included human studies. This review and meta-analysis showed that vit D supplementation in patients with endometriosis seems not to have a clinical effect on the improvement of dysmenorrhea or non-cyclic pelvic pain or IVF outcomes. However, given the heterogeneity and the diversity of the available studies, more research is required to shed light on the role of vit D supplementation in women with endometriosis. Vit D supplementation should be considered to be used in women with low levels of vit D for protection against conditions related to vit D deficiency, such as osteoporosis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file.


  1. Kalaitzopoulos DR, et al. Association between vitamin D and endometriosis: a systematic review. Hormones. 2020;19(2):109–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalaitzopoulos DR, et al. Leptin concentrations in endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reprod Immunol. 2021;146:103338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapron C, et al. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(11):666–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalaitzopoulos DR, et al. Treatment of endometriosis: a review with comparison of 8 guidelines. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nirgianakis K, et al. Regression of the inflammatory microenvironment of the peritoneal cavity in women with endometriosis by GnRHa treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):550–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nirgianakis K, et al. Dienogest mediates midkine suppression in endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(9):1981–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nirgianakis K, McKinnon B, Ma L, Imboden S, Bersinger N Mueller MD. Peritoneal fluid biomarkers in patients with endometriosis: a cross-sectional study. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2021;42(2):113–22.

  9. Nirgianakis K, Egger K, Kalaitzopoulos DR, et al. Effectiveness of Dietary Interventions in the Treatment of Endometriosis: a Systematic Review. Reprod Sci. 2022;26:26–42.

  10. Somigliana E, et al. Vitamin D reserve is higher in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(8):2273–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anastasi E, et al. Low levels of 25-OH vitamin D in women with endometriosis and associated pelvic pain. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(12):e282–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buggio L, et al. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Serum Levels and Endometriosis: Results of a Case-Control Study. Reprod Sci. 2019;26(2):172–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyashita M, et al. Effects of 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D3 on Endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(6):2371–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aranow C. Vitamin D and the Immune System. J Investig Med. 2011;59(6):881–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Froicu M, et al. A Crucial Role for the Vitamin D Receptor in Experimental Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17(12):2386–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitfield GK, et al. Genomic Actions of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Nutr. 1995;125(suppl_6):1690S-1694S.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vienonen A, et al. Expression of nuclear receptors and cofactors in human endometrium and myometrium. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004;11(2):104–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vigano P, et al. Cycling and early pregnant endometrium as a site of regulated expression of the vitamin D system. J Mol Endocrinol. 2006;36(3):415–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Agic A, et al. Relative expression of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor, vitamin D 1 alpha-hydroxylase, vitamin D 24-hydroxylase, and vitamin D 25-hydroxylase in endometriosis and gynecologic cancers. Reprod Sci. 2007;14(5):486–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lopez A, et al. Influence of Stress on the Vitamin D-Vitamin D Receptor System, Macrophages, and the Local Inflammatory Milieu in Endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2020;27(12):2175–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cermisoni GC. Alteri A, Corti L, Rabellotti E, Papaleo E, Viganò P, Sanchez AM. Vitamin D and Endometrium: A Systematic Review of a Neglected Area of Research. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2320.

  22. Higgins JP, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hooijmans CR, et al. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Egger M, DSG, Altman D. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2001, London: BMJ Publishing Group.

  26. Higgins JP, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2006;25(20):3443–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Almassinokiani F, et al. Effects of Vitamin D on Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:4960–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nodler JL, et al. Supplementation with vitamin D or omega-3 fatty acids in adolescent girls and young women with endometriosis (SAGE): a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(1):229–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehdizadehkashi A, Rokhgireh S, Tahermanesh K, Eslahi N, Minaeian S, Samimi M. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on clinical symptoms and metabolic profiles in patients with endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(7):640–5.

  32. Somigliana E, Sarais V, Reschini M, et al. Single oral dose of vitamin D3 supplementation prior to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in normal weight women: the SUNDRO randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:283.e1–10.

  33. Akyol A, et al. Efficacies of vitamin D and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on experimental endometriosis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(6):835–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abbas MA, et al. Regression of endometrial implants treated with vitamin D3 in a rat model of endometriosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;715(1):72–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yildirim B, et al. 1–Alpha, 25–Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Regresses Endometriotic Implants in Rats by Inhibiting Neovascularization and Altering Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase. Postgrad Med. 2014;126(1):104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mariani M, et al. The selective vitamin D receptor agonist, elocalcitol, reduces endometriosis development in a mouse model by inhibiting peritoneal inflammation. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(7):2010–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Delbandi A-A, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D3 Modulates Endometriosis-Related Features of Human Endometriotic Stromal Cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75(4):461–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ingles SA, et al. Differential gene expression by 1,25(OH)2D3 in an endometriosis stromal cell line. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;173:223–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mohagheghian Yaghoubi H, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D3 on gene expression of MDGF, EGF and PDGFB in endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(5):782–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lasco A, Catalano A, Benvenga S. Improvement of primary dysmenorrhea caused by a single oral dose of vitamin D: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(4):366–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zangene M, et al. Evaluation of the Effects of Oral Vitamin-D for Pelvic Pain Reduction in Primary Dysmenorrhea. Iranian J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2014;16(88):14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moini A, et al. The effect of vitamin D on primary dysmenorrhea with vitamin D deficiency: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(6):502–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rahnemaei FA, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for primary dysmenorrhea: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021;64(4):353–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu Z, et al. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2016;19(7):415–27.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Aflatoonian A, et al. Effect of vitamin D insufficiency treatment on fertility outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12(9):595–600.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Abedi S, Taebi M, Nasr Esfahani MH. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019;13(1):18–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fatemi F, et al. Role of vitamin E and D(3) supplementation in Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection outcomes of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A double blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2017;18:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kermack AJ, et al. Effect of a 6-week “Mediterranean” dietary intervention on in vitro human embryo development: the Preconception Dietary Supplements in Assisted Reproduction double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(2):260–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. BezerraEspinola MS, Bilotta G, Aragona C. Positive effect of a new supplementation of vitamin D(3) with myo-inositol, folic acid and melatonin on IVF outcomes: a prospective randomized and controlled pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(3):251–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Borel P, Caillaud D, Cano NJ. Vitamin D bioavailability: state of the art. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(9):1193–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Drincic AT, et al. Volumetric dilution, rather than sequestration best explains the low vitamin D status of obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(7):1444–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Aarts E, et al. Vitamin D absorption: consequences of gastric bypass surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(5):827–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Malvezzi H, et al. Endometriosis: current challenges in modeling a multifactorial disease of unknown etiology. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pazhohan A, et al. Expression and shedding of CD44 in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and modulating effects of vitamin D: A randomized exploratory trial. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;178:150–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors cordially thank Dr. Somigliana, MD PhD, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy who very promptly and kindly provided valuable details on his study.


This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



DRK and IGL contributed to the conception of this review, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, article drafting and revising. NS, AD, KN, ID contributed to the revision of the manuscript and the design of figs. 1, 2 and 3. JMM, PI prepared tables and helped with revision of the article. BL SM contributed to the interpretation of the data, article drafting and revising. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Rafail Kalaitzopoulos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary material 1.

Summary of in vitro and in vivo supplementation studies.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 2

. Quality assessment of RCT human studies.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 3.

Quality assessment of animal studies (SYRCLE tool).

Additional file 4: Supplementary material 4.

Funnel plots.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalaitzopoulos, D.R., Samartzis, N., Daniilidis, A. et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in endometriosis: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 20, 176 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: