Skip to main content
Download PDF

Thyroid autoimmunity and IVF/ICSI outcomes in euthyroid women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 18, Article number: 120 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) – the presence of anti-thyroid peroxidase and/or anti-thyroglobulin antibodies – affects 8–14% of reproductively-aged women. It is hotly debated whether TAI adversely affects IVF/ICSI outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the relationship between thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) and IVF/ICSI outcomes, both overall and amongst euthyroid women of known age using strict criteria for grouping pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

The review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019120947. Searches were undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Database from Inception-March 2020. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, clinical miscarriage rate, biochemical pregnancy loss, livebirth rate per-cycle and live birth rate per clinical pregnancy (CP).

Results

14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with women who tested negative for thyroid autoantibodies (TAI-), there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate overall (OR 0.86; 95%CI [0.70, 1.05]; P = 0.14; 11 studies; I2 = 29.0%), or in euthyroid women (OR 0.88; 95%CI [0.69, 1.12]; P = 0.29; 10 studies; I2 = 32.0%). There was also no significant difference in clinical miscarriage rate overall (OR 1.04; 95%CI [0.52, 2.07]; P = 0.908; 8 studies; I2 = 53%), or in euthyroid women (OR 1.18; 95%CI [0.52, 2.64]; P = 0.69; 7 studies; I2 = 54%). There was no significant difference in biochemical pregnancy loss (OR 1.14; 95%CI [0.48, 2.72]; P = 0.769; 4 studies; I2 = 0.0%), live birth rate per cycle (OR 0.84; 95%CI [0.67, 1.06]; P = 0.145; I2 = 1.7%), live birth rate per clinical pregnancy (OR 0.67; 95%CI [0.28, 1.60]; P = 0.369; I2 = 69.2%), both overall and in euthyroid women as all studies included consisted of euthyroid women only. There was also no significant difference in number of embryos transferred, number of oocytes retrieved, mean maternal age or TSH levels overall or in euthyroid women.

Conclusion

The findings of the present study suggest that thyroid autoimmunity has no effect on pregnancy outcomes in euthyroid women alone, or in euthyroid women and women with subclinical hypothyroidism.

Background

Thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) is defined as the presence of antithyroid antibodies – anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO-Ab) and/or anti-thyroglobulin (TG-Ab) antibodies – and is the most common autoimmune condition in women of reproductive age, with a prevalence of 8–14% [1, 2]. Significantly, TAI has an even higher prevalence of up to 20% in infertile women [3]. Even when thyroid function remains normal, TAI has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including spontaneous miscarriage and preterm birth [1, 4, 5]. Ovarian stimulation used during IVF/ICSI places additional demands on thyroid function [6, 7], which may potentially expose women with TAI (TAI+) to additional risks. Consequently, there has been intense interest in whether TAI compromises outcomes during IVF/ICSI treatment.

Multiple systematic reviews have investigated the relationship between TAI and IVF/ICSI outcomes, however there is substantial discrepancy between findings. Toulis et al. (2010) [8], found that sub-fertile TAI+ women undergoing IVF were at significantly greater risk of miscarriage than women without TAI (TAI-) but did not identify differences in either clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) or delivery rates. Thangaratinam et al. (2011) [9] also found a significantly higher miscarriage rate (MR) amongst TAI+ women. TAI+ women were found to have a greater risk of spontaneous miscarriage in addition to lower live birth rates (LBR) with no reductions in either CPR or implantation rates (IR) [6]. On the contrary, He et al. (2016) [10] found no association between TAI positivity and clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate or delivery rate. Likewise, Leiva et al. (2017) [11] found no association between TAI and increased risk of pregnancy loss.

For a number of reasons, it is important that this topic be revisited. Firstly, earlier meta-analyses combined outcomes that were defined differently in different studies. For instance, some papers considered miscarriage to include both clinical and biochemical pregnancy losses (BPL) (e.g. Muller et al. 1999 [12], Poppe et al. 2003 [13]) whereas others included only clinical losses (e.g. Chai et al. 2014 [14]; Lucaszuk et al. 2015 [15]). In the most recent comprehensive meta-analysis on the effect of TAI on IVF outcomes, all miscarriage types, whether biochemical or clinical were pooled into a single analysis [6]. For uniformity, it is critically important to analyse each miscarriage type separately since biochemical and clinical losses have very different frequencies and aetiologies [16]. Biochemical pregnancy loss in IVF is estimated to have an incidence of up to 22% [17], compared to clinical miscarriage which has an incidence of ~ 15% [18, 19]. A number of mechanisms have been proposed by which, TAI might increase miscarriage risk including detrimental effects on the endometrium, embryo toxicity, general immune disturbance and compromised ability of thyroid function to satisfy increased demands of pregnancy [2]. It is conceivable that very early post-implantation pregnancy stages might have a different vulnerability to these threats than later stages. To explore whether stage-specific vulnerability to TAI might exist, we not only analysed outcomes for all miscarriages, but also differentiated between biochemical and clinical losses whenever possible. For LBR analyses, some papers calculated LBR on a per-cycle basis whereas others calculated on a per-clinical pregnancy (CP) basis; again, these were combined into a single analysis [6]. As with MR outcomes, it is important that like-for-like livebirth outcomes are compared. Notably, similar concerns also apply to the two meta-analyses on this topic performed prior to 2016 [8, 9].

A second critically important consideration is that female age was not reported in 3 of the 12 studies included in the most recent comprehensive meta-analysis [6]. This is pivotal since arguably the most important determinant of pregnancy outcome is female age due to the effects of ageing on oocyte quality, which ultimately impacts aneuploidy rates [20]. Moreover, when age was analysed for the 9 papers in which maternal age was known, Busnelli et al. (2016) [6] found that TAI+ women were significantly older than TAI- women. Based on these analyses, therefore, it is very unclear to what extent the older age of the TAI+ cohort contributed to the adverse reproductive outcomes that were observed.

Thirdly, since the last meta-analysis, at least 4 further studies analysing women of known ages have been published [21,22,23,24]. Busnelli et al. (2016) [6] included a total of 428 TAI+ women of known ages. These 3 newer studies [21,22,23,24] contain an additional 390 TAI+ women.

Fourthly, half of the 12 studies included in Busnelli et al. (2016) [6] were published prior to 2010. In more recent years, guidelines from the ASRM and the American Thyroid Association [25] suggest that a lower thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) cut-off (2.5 mIU/mL) should be used for initiating levothyroxine treatment in TAI+ women. Newer studies may therefore include women with more intact thyroid function whereas older studies may have included patients with more severe thyroid imbalances, which may have increased the tendency to adverse outcomes in earlier meta-analyses. Indeed, two of the studies in the recent meta-analysis [12, 26] included women with overtly abnormal TSH levels. It is notable in this regard that the 2011 meta-analysis identified an increased odds ratio (OR) for miscarriage of 3.15 amongst TAI+ women [9] whereas in Busnelli et al. (2016) [6], the OR had declined to less than half this at 1.44 [6]. Furthermore, in He et al. (2016) [10] and Leiva et al. (2017) [11], no significant relationship was found between TAI and IVF outcomes. While He et al. (2016) [10] found no association between TAI positivity and clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate or delivery rate in euthyroid women, they did find that women with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) and TAI were at greater risk of miscarriage and had a lower delivery rate than TAI- women, indicating that the extent of associated thyroid dysfunction, rather than TAI per se, could account in some part for adverse outcomes reported in previous studies.

Here we undertook an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the overall relationship between TAI and IVF/ICSI outcomes as has been done previously, as well as separate analyses of euthyroid women of known female age using strict criteria for defining pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and methods

Protocol and registration

PRISMA guidelines were followed and the review was registered with PROSPERO (Registration no. CRD42019120947).

Search strategy

Literature searches were conducted via MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Methodology Register), and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index) from inception to April 2019. Searches were rerun in March 2020 prior to publication. The Medline search utilised a combination of text and medical subject headings (MeSH): (“Thyroid Gland”[Mesh] AND “Autoimmunity”[Mesh]) OR “thyroid autoimmunity” OR “thyroid autoantibody” OR “thyroid autoantibodies” OR antithyroid peroxidase OR “antithyroglobulin antibody”, “Fertilization in Vitro”[Mesh] OR IVF OR “invitro fertilization” OR “in vitro fertilization” OR “in-vitro fertilization” OR “invitro fertilization” OR “invitro fertilisation” OR “in vitro fertilisation” OR “in-vitro fertilisation” OR “invitro fertilisation” OR “Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic”[Mesh] OR “intracytoplasmic sperm injection” OR ICSI OR ART [tiab] OR “reproductive techniques, assisted”[MeSH Terms] OR “assisted reproductive technology”. Search terms were set by the authors and were adapted for use with other databases. No language restrictions were implemented. Peer reviewed case control and cohort studies were eligible for inclusion.

Study selection

Title and abstract screening were performed independently by two authors (A.V. and W.W.) to eliminate studies deemed irrelevant. The full text versions of relevant studies were retrieved and assessed for eligibility by the same author. Any uncertainty was resolved through discussion with a third author. Studies were excluded if: (i) women had overt thyroid dysfunction, (ii) maternal age was not reported, (iii) women were being treated with levothyroxine, (iv) ART techniques aside from IVF/ICSI were used. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale [27].

Data extraction and analysis

Two authors extracted data independently. Study year, setting, design, thyroid antibody assays used and cut-off values, number of TAI+ and TAI- patients, number of IVF/ ICSI cycles performed, type of ART procedure performed and key outcomes of the study were recorded. Extracted data was compared to ensure accuracy, and discrepancies were corrected upon referral back to the original paper.

The primary outcomes measured were CPR, MR, and LBR as; (i) CP: the presence of a gestational sac on ultrasound scan, CPR: the proportion of IVF/ICSI cycles resulting in a CP; (ii) MR: the proportion of pregnancies that miscarried/did not result in a delivery or live birth, CMR: the proportion of clinical pregnancies that miscarried/did not result in a delivery or live birth, BPL: the proportion of biochemical pregnancies that were lost prior to the CP stage (iii) LBR: the proportion of cycles of IVF/ICSI that resulted in the birth of at least one live baby, calculated per cycle and per CP. In cases where outcomes of interest were not reported by the study but could be determined from the raw data, outcomes were calculated manually. Secondary outcomes such as overall MR (including all definitions of MR: BPR + CMR + CMR alone), maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved (NOR), and numbers of embryos transferred (ET) were also recorded.

Statistical method

Data were analysed in STATA 15 [28]. Pooled effect sizes were estimated by applying random effects meta-analysis. The I2 statistic was used as a measure of heterogeneity between studies. An I2 value of 0% indicates no heterogeneity whereas values of 25, 50 and 75% reflect low, moderate and high heterogeneity, respectively [29]. Egger’s weighted regression test was used to assess publication bias where more than 10 studies were included in the analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed where moderate levels of heterogeneity were detected.

Results

Results of literature search and description of included studies

Systematic searches of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases identified 491 citations, with 332 of these being non-duplicates (Fig. 1). 274 articles were excluded based on title and abstract screening. The full texts of 58 articles were retrieved. An additional 45 articles were excluded (Fig. 1) on the following basis: 5 articles did not report maternal age, 7 articles did not include either a TAI+ group or a TAI- control group, 3 studies included patients on levothyroxine, 3 were review articles, 3 did not report patient outcomes, 19 were conference abstracts, 1 did not use IVF/ICSI, 2 were excluded due to patient overlap and 2 studies were excluded during data analysis due to discrepancies in results (additional file 1). One more study was added in March 2020 when searches were rerun. Details of the 14 studies that were included in the final analyses are presented in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart depicting study selection process

Full size image
Table 1 Description of included studies investigating the association between TAI status and IVF/ICSI outcomes
Full size table

Outcomes

CPR

Overall CPR was reported by 11 studies. No significant difference in CPR was observed between TAI+ and TAI- women (OR 0.86; 95%CI [0.70, 1.05]; P = 0.14; 11 studies; I2 = 29.0%)(Fig. 2a). CPR in euthyroid women was reported by 10 studies. No significant difference in CPR was observed between TAI+ and TAI- women (OR 0.88; 95%CI [0.69, 1.12]; P = 0.29; 10 studies; I2 = 32.0%)(Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Overall association between thyroid autoimmunity and likelihood of clinical pregnancy. Results showed no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (OR 0.86; 95%CI [0.70, 1.05]; P = 0.14; 11 studies; I2 = 29.0%). b Association between thyroid autoimmunity and likelihood of clinical pregnancy in euthyroid women. Results showed no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates in TAI+ and TAI- euthyroid women (OR 0.88; 95%CI [0.69, 1.12]; P = 0.29; 10 studies; I2 = 32.0%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

MR

Overall CMR was reported by 8 studies. No significant difference was observed in CMR between TAI+ and TAI- women (OR 1.04; 95%CI [0.52, 2.07]; P = 0.908; 8 studies; I2 = 53%) (Fig. 3a). CMR in euthyroid women was reported by 7 studies. No significant difference was observed in CMR between TAI+ and TAI- women (OR 1.18; 95%CI [0.52, 2.64]; P = 0.69; 7 studies; I2 = 54%) (Fig. 3b). BPL was reported by 4 studies, all of which only included euthyroid women (Fig. 4). No significant difference was observed in BPL between TAI+ and TAI- women (OR 1.14; 95%CI [0.48, 2.72]; P = 0.769; 4 studies; I2 = 0.0%). 11 studies reported overall MR using a variety of definitions. No significant difference in MR based on all definitions combined was observed (OR 1.33; 95%CI [0.83–2.15]; P = 0.23; 11 studies; I2 = 47%)(Fig. 5a). 8 studies reported MR using a variety of definitions in euthyroid women. No significant difference in MR based on all definitions combined was observed (OR 1.26; 95%CI [0.72–2.18]; P = 0.42; 8 studies; I2 = 35%)(Fig. 5b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Overall association between thyroid autoimmunity and clinical miscarriage rate. Results showed no significant difference in clinical miscarriage rate between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (OR 1.04; 95%CI [0.52, 2.07]; P = 0.908; 8 studies; I2 = 53%). b) Association between thyroid autoimmunity and clinical miscarriage rate in euthyroid women. Results showed no significant difference in clinical miscarriage rate between TAI+ and TAI- euthyroid women (OR 1.18; 95%CI [0.52, 2.64]; P = 0.69; 7 studies; I2 = 54%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Association between thyroid autoimmunity and likelihood of biochemical pregnancy loss. Results showed no significant difference in biochemical pregnancy loss between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (OR 1.14; 95%CI [0.48, 2.72]; P = 0.77; 4 studies; I2 = 0.0%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Overall association between thyroid autoimmunity and likelihood of miscarriage according to all definitions. Results showed no significant difference in likelihood of miscarriage according to all definitions between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (OR 1.33; 95%CI [0.83–2.15]; P = 0.23; 11 studies; I2 = 47.4%). b) Association between thyroid autoimmunity and likelihood of miscarriage according to all definitions in euthyroid women. Results showed no significant difference in likelihood of miscarriage according to all definitions between TAI+ and TAI- euthyroid women (OR 1.26; 95%CI [0.72–2.18]; P = 0.42; 8 studies; I2 = 35%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

LBR

LBR per CP was reported by 4 studies, all of which only included euthyroid women. No significant difference was observed in LBR between TAI+ and TAI- women (OR 0.67; 95%CI [0.28, 1.60]; P = 0.369; I2 = 69.2%)(Fig. 6). LBR per cycle was reported by 5 studies and no significant difference was observed in LBR per cycle between TAI+ and TAI- women (OR 0.84; 95%CI [0.67, 1.06]; P = 0.145; I2 = 1.7%) (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Association between thyroid autoimmunity and likelihood of live birth per clinical pregnancy. Results showed no significant difference in likelihood of live birth per clinical pregnancy between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (OR 0.67; 95%CI [0.28, 1.60]; P = 0.37; 4 studies; I2 = 69%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Association between thyroid autoimmunity and likelihood of live birth per cycle. Results showed no significant difference in likelihood of live birth per cycle between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (OR 0.84; 95%CI [0.67, 1.06]; P = 0.15; 5 studies; I2 = 2%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

ET

Overall mean number of embryos transferred was reported by 5 studies. No significant difference in mean number of transferred embryos was observed between TAI+ and TAI- women (SMD 0.02; 95%CI [− 0.18, 0.22]; P = 0.849; I2 = 69%) (Fig. 8a). Mean number of embryos transferred in euthyroid women was reported by 3 studies. No significant difference in mean numbers was observed between TAI+ and TAI- women (SMD 0.07; 95%CI [− 0.13, 0.27]; P = 0.49; I2 = 0%) (Fig. 8b).

Fig. 8
figure 8

a Overall association between thyroid autoimmunity and mean number of embryos transferred. Results showed no significant difference in number of embryos transferred between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (SMD 0.02; 95%CI [− 0.18, 0.22]; P = 0.85; 5 studies; I2 = 69%). b Association between thyroid autoimmunity and mean number of embryos transferred in euthyroid women. Results showed no significant difference in number of embryos transferred between TAI+ and TAI- euthyroid women (SMD 0.07; 95%CI [− 0.13, 0.23]; P = 0.49; 3 studies; I2 = 0%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; SMD, standard mean difference; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

NOR

Overall number of oocytes retrieved (NOR) was reported by 9 studies. No significant difference was observed between TAI+ and TAI- women (SMD -0.07; 95%CI [− 0.20, 0.06]; P = 0.27; 9 studies; I2 = 49%)(Fig. 9a). NOR in euthyroid women was reported by 7 studies. No significant difference was observed between TAI+ and TAI- women (SMD -0.05; 95%CI [− 0.25, 0.16]; P = 0.67; 7 studies; I2 = 60%)(Fig. 9b).

Fig. 9
figure 9

a Overall association between thyroid autoimmunity and number of oocytes retrieved. Results showed no significant difference in number of oocytes retrieved between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (SMD -0.07; 95%CI [− 0.20, 0.06]; P = 0.27; 9 studies; I2 = 49%). b Association between thyroid autoimmunity and number of oocytes retrieved in euthyroid women. Results showed no significant difference in number of oocytes retrieved between TAI+ and TAI- euthyroid women (SMD -0.05; 95%CI [− 0.25, 0.16]; P = 0.67; 7 studies; I2 = 60%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; SMD, standard mean difference; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

Age

Age was reported by all 14 studies. One study reported age as the median (25th–75th) [15] and could not therefore be included in our analysis of mean ages. However, since patients in this study had a median age below 37 without any significant difference between TAI+ and TAI- groups [15], data from this study was included in other analyses. Analysis of the 13 remaining studies revealed no significant differences in patient age between all TAI+ and TAI- women (SMD 0.12; 95%CI [− 0.04, 0.28]; P = 0.15; 13 studies; I2 = 76%) (Fig. 10a). There were also no significant age differences between the sub-group of TAI+ and TAI- women who were euthyroid (SMD 0.13; 95%CI [− 0.10, 0.36]; P = 0.25; 10 studies; I2 = 82%)(Fig. 10b).

Fig. 10
figure 10

a Overall association between thyroid autoimmunity and mean maternal age. Results showed no significant difference in mean maternal age between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (SMD 0.12; 95%CI [− 0.04, 0.28]; P = 0.15; 13 studies; I2 = 76%). b Association between thyroid autoimmunity and mean maternal age in euthyroid women. Results showed no significant difference in mean maternal age between TAI+ and TAI- euthyroid women (SMD 0.13; 95%CI [− 0.10, 0.36]; P = 0.25; 10 studies; I2 = 82%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; SMD, standard mean difference; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

TSH

TSH levels were reported by 6 studies and no significant difference was seen between TAI+ and TAI- women (SMD 0.28; 95%CI [− 0.03, 0.59]; P = 0.08; 6 studies; I2 = 79%)(Fig. 11a). In the 5 studies that reported TSH levels specifically in euthyroid women, no significant difference in TSH levels was seen between TAI+ and TAI- women (SMD 0.14; 95%CI [− 0.07, 0.34]; P = 0.19; 5 studies; I2 = 46%)(Fig. 11b).

Fig. 11
figure 11

a Overall association between thyroid autoimmunity and TSH levels. Results showed no significant difference in TSH levels between TAI+ and TAI- women overall (SMD 0.28; 95%CI [− 0.03, 0.59]; P = 0.08; 6 studies; I2 = 79%). b Association between thyroid autoimmunity and TSH levels in euthyroid women. Results showed no significant difference in TSH levels between TAI+ and TAI- euthyroid women (SMD 0.14; 95%CI [− 0.07, 0.34]; P = 0.19; 5 studies; I2 = 46%). TAI+, thyroid autoimmune; TAI-, not thyroid autoimmune; SMD, standard mean difference; CI, confidence interval

Full size image

Heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis

Analyses displaying moderate/high heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 50%) were adjusted following sensitivity analysis (Table 2). Removal of 1–2 studies was sufficient to reduce heterogeneity in all cases. Following sensitivity analyses, CPR, CMR, MR, LBR per CP and ET showed no change in statistical significance outcomes compared with unadjusted analyses. In NOR analyses, exclusion of Karacan et al. (2013) [34] led to significantly fewer oocytes being retrieved amongst TAI+ women (SMD -0.13; 95%CI [− 0.22, − 0.04], P = 0.007).

Table 2 Results of meta-analysis before and after sensitivity analysis
Full size table

Publication Bias

Results of Egger’s weighted regression test indicated no publication bias in mean maternal age, CPR, overall MR or OPR.

Quality analysis

Of the 14 studies included, the quality ranged from 7 to 8 (Table 1). No studies were excluded from the analysis based on poor quality.

Discussion

Here we undertake the most comprehensive meta-analysis to-date regarding the effect of TAI on IVF/ICSI outcomes in women of known ages and TSH status. For the first time, we use strict criteria to analyse BPL and CMR as well as LBR on a per-cycle and per-CP basis in euthyroid women as well as in a larger group, which included women with SCH. We found no difference in any pregnancy outcomes in relation to TAI status. Our results contrast with previous meta-analyses showing increased MR and/or decreased LBR in TAI+ women overall and in euthyroid women undergoing IVF/ICSI [6, 8, 9]. On the other hand, our findings are consistent with those of He et al. (2016) [10] and Leiva et al. (2017) [11]. There are important differences between our study and previous meta-analyses that may explain some of these discrepancies. Our systematic review included the most recent studies such as Devi et al. (2019) [22], Chen et al. (2017) [21] and Sakar et al. (2016) [18], which did not find any association between TAI positivity and pregnancy outcome. We also analysed outcomes in studies that were strictly limited to euthyroid women in addition to the wider group seen in previous studies. We were also strict in analysing like-for-like outcomes (e.g. CMR and LBR per cycle) rather than combining variously defined outcomes into a single analysis. Given the powerful influence of female age on pregnancy outcome through effects on oocyte quality [20], a critically important strength of our study was to restrict analyses to papers that reported female age. Importantly, we found that both groups were comparably aged thereby unequivocally ruling out the possibility of an age effect. In contrast, in the most recent meta-analysis, one quarter of included studies had not reported age and analysis of ages amongst those that did, found that TAI+ women were significantly older than TAI- women [6]. A meta-regression analysis performed by the authors suggested that such differences were unlikely to have impacted their outcomes [6]. However, this cannot be concluded with certainty since, as the authors themselves noted, only 9 studies were included in the meta-regression, which is below the minimum of 10 recommended for avoiding Type II errors [29] added to which, ages were completely unknown for a substantial proportion of included studies. Furthermore, by considering maternal TSH levels, the present study accounted for potential confounding effects due to substantial thyroid dysfunction.

The lack of a detrimental effect of TAI on pregnancy outcomes that we find here is consistent with two recent large RCTs. The first RCT, the POSTAL study, tested whether levothyroxine supplementation could reduce MR in 600 TAI+ euthyroid women (mean age 31.6 years) undergoing IVF and found there was no benefit [36]. Since this study did not include a TAI- group, it is not known whether MR was actually increased in their untreated TAI+ cohort. Indeed, the study was powered against a predicted CMR of 30% for TAI+ women but unexpectedly, the actual MR in their untreated TAI+ arm was only 10.6%, which was no higher, and indeed, somewhat lower than the background rate of ~ 15% for women of a similar age [18, 19]. The recently reported TABLET trial [37] studied a broader population of TAI+ women with a history of miscarriage or infertility and again found no benefit of levothyroxine supplementation. Significantly, however, the rate of combined CMR and BPL was ~ 30%; this rate, which includes biochemical losses that occur with high frequency, also seems to be no higher than the predicted rate in the general population [16]. It is therefore likely that the lack of effect observed in both studies was at least in part because there isn’t a markedly increased risk of miscarriage in the first place in TAI+ women, entirely consistent with our present findings.

There has been another recent meta-analysis that did not consider the full breadth of IVF patients as we did here, but instead focused only on studies in which ICSI was performed for fertilisation [38]. Consequently, it only contained 4 studies, 3 of which had been included in the earlier meta-analysis by Busnelli et al. (2016) [6], along with a more recent paper [23] which we included in our study. Significantly, Poppe et al. (2018) [38] found no difference in MR when analyses were strictly restricted to CPs, entirely in keeping with our findings. There have been a number of alternative theories regarding ICSI’s ability to overcome the adverse effects of TAI on pregnancy outcomes. It has been suggested that anti thyroid antibodies may bind antigens in the zona pellucida, thereby disrupting its function [39], and that ICSI may be able to overcome this effect. However, in light of the present study’s findings, it appears more likely that the finding of Poppe et al. (2018) [38] are due to the inclusion of more recent studies and stricter inclusion criteria.

A recent meta-analysis investigating the effect of levothyroxine treatment found that MR in TAI+ women who conceived with ART were not reduced by levothyroxine but that levothyroxine decreased MR among TAI+ women who also had SCH [40] suggesting that SCH rather than TAI per se may confer the detrimental effect. Considering the recent change in guidelines, which now propose that TAI+ women with TSH > 2.5 mIU/mL should be supplemented with thyroxine [25, 41], most women with SCH and TAI were more likely to have been excluded from more recent studies. It is therefore possible that previous negative effects on pregnancy outcomes in TAI+ women may have been due to SCH, rather than TAI itself. It is worth noting that a number of studies included in previous analyses that were not included in the present study did not report serum TSH levels, making it possible that the relationship between TAI and adverse pregnancy outcomes may have been due to thyroid dysfunction. We note, however, that the results of the present study do not support this notion since we found no association between TAI and pregnancy outcome either in euthyroid women or the overall group. Studies such as Chai et al. (2014) [14] and Zhuang et al. (2017) [24] separated their investigation on TAI and IVF based on maternal serum TSH levels < 2.5 and > 2.5 and found no difference in IVF outcomes based on TSH status. Furthermore, A recent retrospective study and meta-analysis found no increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with TSH > 2.5 [42]. Thus, whilst this idea may hold some merit, further investigation is required.

We acknowledge that a variety of factors may influence the strength of our findings. Individual studies assessed different antibodies (TPO-Ab and/or TG-Ab) and used different assays as well as different cut-off values for defining TAI positivity (Table 1), which could potentially affect outcomes. Cause of infertility maybe be a potential confounding factor. A number of the included studies reported no significant difference in cause of infertility between the TAI+ and TAI- groups. However, each had varying inclusion criteria, and in recent a recent meta-analysis, TAI has been shown to be more prevalent in conditions associated with poor IVF outcomes such as PCOS [43]. It has been shown that the presence of TPO-Ab in particular is associated with an increased risk of PCOS and endometriosis, and varying aetiologies based on the inclusion criteria and antibodies present may have influenced results [36]. There were also limited details on individual patients such as stimulation protocols used, which could theoretically affect results given that antagonist and agonist protocols could have different effects on thyroid function [44]. The numbers of embryos transferred could also impact pregnancy outcomes. Although we considered this potential confounder, and analysis of the five studies that reported embryo numbers transferred showed no difference in relation to TAI status (Fig. 8), we did not have data on embryo numbers for 9 studies. We note as well that although we adhered to uniform criteria for outcomes, the included studies defined and reported clinical outcomes differently and some studies were excluded based on discrepancies in the reported data, a lack of clarity regarding definitions, or insufficient available data regarding clinical outcomes. It therefore remains possible that some important data were omitted that may have influenced the results.

Conclusions

The results of the present study suggest that TAI has no effect on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF either overall, or in euthyroid women. The findings of this study may be useful when deciding on treatment plans for TAI+ women undergoing IVF.

Availability of data and materials

The current study was based on results of relevant published studies.

Abbreviations

TAI:

Thyroid Autoimmunity

TPO-Ab:

Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies

TG-Ab:

Anti-thyroglobulin antibodies

MR:

Miscarriage rate

CMR:

Clinical miscarriage rate

BPL:

Biochemical pregnancy loss

CP:

Clinical pregnancy

CPR:

Clinical pregnancy rate

LBR:

Live birth rate

IR:

Implantation rate

NOR:

Number of oocytes retrieved

ET:

Embryos transferred

TSH:

Thyroid stimulating hormone

SCH:

Subclinical hypothyroidism

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Krassas GE, Poppe K, Glinoer D. Thyroid function and human reproductive health. Endocr Rev. 2010;31(5):702–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vissenberg R, Manders VD, Mastenbroek S, Fliers E, Afink GB, Ris-Stalpers C, et al. Pathophysiological aspects of thyroid hormone disorders/thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(3):378–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghazeeri GS, Kutteh WH. Autoimmune factors in reproductive failure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13(3):287–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Korevaar TIM, Derakhshan A, Taylor PN, Meima M, Chen L, Bliddal S, et al. Association of Thyroid Function Test Abnormalities and Thyroid Autoimmunity with Preterm Birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2019;322(7):632–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. van den Boogaard E, Vissenberg R, Land JA, van Wely M, van der Post JA, Goddijn M, et al. Significance of (sub) clinical thyroid dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity before conception and in early pregnancy: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):605–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Busnelli A, Paffoni A, Fedele L, Somigliana E. The impact of thyroid autoimmunity on IVF/ICSI outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(6):775–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poppe K, Glinoer D, Tournaye H, Schiettecatte J, Devroey P, van Steirteghem A, et al. Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on thyroid function in women with and without thyroid autoimmunity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(8):3808–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Toulis KA, Goulis DG, Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Negro R, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Risk of spontaneous miscarriage in euthyroid women with thyroid autoimmunity undergoing IVF: a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162(4):643–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thangaratinam S, Tan A, Knox E, Kilby MD, Franklyn J, Coomarasamy A. Association between thyroid autoantibodies and miscarriage and preterm birth: meta-analysis of evidence. Bmj. 2011;342:d2616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. He H, Jing S, Gong F, Tan YQ, Lu GX, Lin G. Effect of thyroid autoimmunity per se on assisted reproduction treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(2):159–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leiva P, Schwarze JE, Vasquez P, Ortega C, Villa S, Crosby J, et al. There is no association between the presence of anti-thyroid antibodies and increased reproductive loss in pregnant women after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(4):361–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller AF, Verhoeff A, Mantel MJ, Berghout A. Thyroid autoimmunity and abortion: a prospective study in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(1):30–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poppe K, Glinoer D, Tournaye H, Devroey P, van Steirteghem A, Kaufman L, et al. Assisted reproduction and thyroid autoimmunity: an unfortunate combination? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(9):4149–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chai J, Yeung WY, Lee CY, Li HW, Ho PC, Ng HY. Live birth rates following in vitro fertilization in women with thyroid autoimmunity and/or subclinical hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;80(1):122–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Łukaszuk K, Kunicki M, Kulwikowska P, Liss J, Pastuszek E, Jaszczołt M, et al. The impact of the presence of antithyroid antibodies on pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmatic sperm injection-ICSI and embryo transfer in women with normal thyreotropine levels. J Endocrinol Investig. 2015;38(12):1335–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Macklon NS, Geraedts JP, Fauser BC. Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the 'black box' of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(4):333–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeadna A, Son WY, Moon JH, Dahan MH. A comparison of biochemical pregnancy rates between women who underwent IVF and fertile controls who conceived spontaneously†. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(4):783–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saravelos SH, Li TC. Unexplained recurrent miscarriage: how can we explain it? Hum Reprod. 2012;27(7):1882–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. Bmj. 2000;320(7251):1708–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Greaney J, Wei Z, Homer H. Regulation of chromosome segregation in oocytes and the cellular basis for female meiotic errors. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(2):135–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Mo ML, Huang CY, Diao LH, Li GG, Li YY, et al. Association of serum autoantibodies with pregnancy outcome of patients undergoing first IVF/ICSI treatment: a prospective cohort study. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;122:14–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Devi AB, Prasad SS, Koner BC. Antithyroid Antibodies and Fertility Outcome in Euthyroid Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2019;13(5):QC05-08.

  23. Sakar MN, Unal A, Atay AE, Zebitay AG, Verit FF, Demir S, et al. Is there an effect of thyroid autoimmunity on the outcomes of assisted reproduction? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(2):213–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhuang LL, Hao CF, Zhang N, Liu XY, Ge L, Ma JL. Effects of thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid autoantibodies on pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Reprod Med. 2017;62:391–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alexander EK, Pearce EN, Brent GA, Brown RS, Chen H, Dosiou C, et al. 2017 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease during Pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid. 2017;27(3):315–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kutteh WH, Yetman DL, Carr AC, Beck LA, Scott RT Jr. Increased prevalence of antithyroid antibodies identified in women with recurrent pregnancy loss but not in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(5):843–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wells GA, Shea, B., O’Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses.3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics 2000 [http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm.].

    Google Scholar 

  28. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011, published as a textbook by Wiley-Blackwell in September 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.

  30. Negro R, Formoso G, Coppola L, Presicce G, Mangieri T, Pezzarossa A, et al. Euthyroid women with autoimmune disease undergoing assisted reproduction technologies: the role of autoimmunity and thyroid function. J Endocrinol Investig. 2007;30(1):3–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kilic S, Tasdemir N, Yilmaz N, Yuksel B, Gul A, Batioglu S. The effect of anti-thyroid antibodies on endometrial volume, embryo grade and IVF outcome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2008;24(11):649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Revelli A, Casano S, Piane LD, Grassi G, Gennarelli G, Guidetti D, et al. A retrospective study on IVF outcome in euthyroid patients with anti-thyroid antibodies: effects of levothyroxine, acetyl-salicylic acid and prednisolone adjuvant treatments. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhong YP, Ying Y, Wu HT, Zhou CQ, Xu YW, Wang Q, et al. Relationship between antithyroid antibody and pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(2):121–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Karacan M, Alwaeely F, Cebi Z, Berberoglugil M, Batukan M, Ulug M, et al. Effect of antithyroid antibodies on ICSI outcome in antiphospholipid antibody-negative euthyroid women. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;27(4):376–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan S, Dieterle S, Pechlavanis S, Janssen OE, Fuhrer D. Thyroid autoantibodies per se do not impair intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in euthyroid healthy women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(4):495–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang H, Gao H, Chi H, Zeng L, Xiao W, Wang Y, et al. Effect of levothyroxine on miscarriage among women with Normal thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2017;318(22):2190–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dhillon-Smith RK, Middleton LJ, Sunner KK, Cheed V, Baker K, Farrell-Carver S, et al. Levothyroxine in women with thyroid peroxidase antibodies before conception. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(14):1316–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Poppe K, Autin C, Veltri F, Kleynen P, Grabczan L, Rozenberg S, et al. Thyroid autoimmunity and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(5):1755-66.

  39. Monteleone P, Parrini D, Faviana P, Carletti E, Casarosa E, Uccelli A, et al. Female infertility related to thyroid autoimmunity: the ovarian follicle hypothesis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;66(2):108–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rao M, Zeng Z, Zhou F, Wang H, Liu J, Wang R, et al. Effect of levothyroxine supplementation on pregnancy loss and preterm birth in women with subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(3):344–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Subclinical hypothyroidism in the infertile female population: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):545–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jin L, Wang M, Yue J, Zhu G-J, Zhang B. Association between TSH level and pregnancy outcomes in Euthyroid women undergoing IVF/ICSI: a retrospective study and meta-analysis. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39(4):631–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Romitti M, Fabris VC, Ziegelmann PK, Maia AL, Spritzer PM. Association between PCOS and autoimmune thyroid disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(11):1158–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gizzo S, Noventa M, Quaranta M, Vitagliano A, Esposito F, Andrisani A, et al. The potential role of GnRH agonists and antagonists in inducing thyroid Physiopathological changes during IVF. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(4):515–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge and thank Professor Mieke van Driel from the University of Queensland for her help in designing this review.

Funding

This work was supported by the Christopher Chen Endowment and grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1078134, APP1103689 & APP1122484) to HAH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Ashley Venables

  2. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Wilbert Wong

  3. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia

    Mandy Way

  4. Christopher Chen Oocyte Biology Research Laboratory, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Hayden Anthony Homer

  5. Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Clinic, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Hayden Anthony Homer

  6. Queensland Fertility Group, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Hayden Anthony Homer

Authors
  1. Ashley Venables
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wilbert Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mandy Way
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hayden Anthony Homer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AV was involved in study design and undertook the majority of database searches, quality assessment, study selection, data extraction, data analysis, manuscript drafting, and critical discussion. WW assisted with database searches, quality assessment and data extraction. MW undertook statistical analyses, interpreting data and manuscript drafting. HH conceived and designed the project, assisted with data interpretation, manuscript drafting, manuscript revision and critical discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayden Anthony Homer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venables, A., Wong, W., Way, M. et al. Thyroid autoimmunity and IVF/ICSI outcomes in euthyroid women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 18, 120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00671-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00671-3

Keywords

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us