Skip to main content

The enigmatic seminal plasma: a proteomics insight from ejaculation to fertilization



The ‘omics’ approach for a noninvasive diagnosis of male reproductive system disorders has gained momentum during the last decade, particularly from a screening and prognosis point of view. Due to the rapid development in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) over the years, the major focus of proteomic studies has been around the ejaculated spermatozoa. Although seminal plasma is not a requirement for ART, the question arose whether the role of seminal plasma is merely to transport spermatozoa.

Main body

Seminal plasma (SP) contains a large diversity of proteins that are essential not only for sperm transport, but also for sperm protection and maturation. Most of the proteins bind to sperm surface through exosomes (epididymosomes and prostasomes), modulating sperm function, interaction with the female reproductive tract and finally fertilization. This review focuses on the state-of-art discoveries regarding SP proteome and its role in fertilization.


Tissue-specific proteins in the SP have emerged as fundamental contributors for protein biomarker discovery. This is important for a noninvasive diagnosis of male infertility and development of new therapeutic approaches. Moreover, ART success rates may be improved by taking into account the critical role of seminal proteome in fertilization.


Semen comprises about 5% of testicular secretions containing spermatozoa and 95% of seminal plasma (SP), which includes secretions from accessory sex glands. The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) facilitated the direct involvement of sperm in fertilization, specifically for the delivery of paternal genetic content and embryo development. Consequently, the role of SP in the regulation of reproductive processes to achieve a successful birth has been largely neglected. Although SP components have a potential diagnostic value, such as measurement of fructose levels for abnormalities in seminal vesicles [1] and measurement of prostatic acid phosphatase for the presence of prostatic secretions in SP [2], they have been given little clinical consideration. SP plays a key role in natural fertilization as it contributes to a timely capacitation, acrosome reaction and sperm-oocyte interaction [3, 4]. Its complex proteomic composition, growth factors and transcription factors, nourishes and protects spermatozoa as they travel throughout the male and female reproductive tracts. As a result, it ensures the interaction of spermatozoa with the oocyte to undergo fertilization [5]. The presence of tissue-specific proteins in the SP can serve as potential biomarkers for the assessment of male fertility. One comprehensive review by Drabovich et al. [6] reported the role of SP proteins as markers of male fertility evaluation with special reference to prostate cancer and azoospermia. The various milestones in our understanding of SP proteome (Table 1) have prompted many investigators to gain further insights into its function and role in human reproduction, as well as its potential as a screening, diagnostic and prognostic tool in male fertility assessment. Therefore, this review focuses on the role of SP proteins in different reproductive processes including the modulation of spermatozoa functions and fertilization.

Table 1 Major breakthroughs in the development of proteomic biomarkers through proteomic analysis of human seminal plasma

Review criteria

PUBMED and Google Scholar databases were explored for relevant literature (1942–2017) on the proteomics study of SP using the following keywords: “seminal fluid proteins”, “semen proteins”, “seminal plasma proteins”, “proteomics and biomarker discovery”, “seminal plasma proteomics”, “seminal plasma biomarkers”, “seminal plasma and sperm”, “seminal plasma and male fertility”, “seminal plasma and inflammation”, “seminal plasma and immune tolerance”, “seminal plasma and ovarian function”, “seminal plasma and female reproductive tract events”, “seminal plasma and endometrial tissue remodeling”, “seminal plasma and uterine receptivity” and “seminal plasma and embryotrophic cytokines”. All full-text articles published in peer-reviewed journals in English were selected, total of 262 articles. Many review articles and animal studies were not considered either due to poor relevance to our topic or repeated information in more recent studies. A total of 99 references were included (97 articles and two book chapters). Nine references with more than 20 years were considered either due to historical importance or as supportive evidence. The majority of the references (61) are from the last 10 years.

Composition of seminal plasma

SP is constituted by secretions derived from testes (~ 2–5%; sperm cells), epididymides and prostate (~ 20–30%), seminal vesicles (~ 65–75%), as well as bulbouretheral and periurethral gland (~ 1%) (Fig. 1) [7]. It is rich in sugars, oligosaccharides, glycans [8], lipids [9], inorganic ions, small molecule metabolites [10], cell-free DNA [11], RNA, microRNAs [12], peptides and proteins [10]. The average protein concentration in SP is about 35–55 g/L. These components mediate the interaction between SP and spermatozoa, regulating their function and facilitating their transit through the female reproductive tract [13, 14]. The alkaline secretions of seminal vesicles and prostate counteract the vaginal acidity for optimal sperm survival. The overall contribution of seminal vesicles to SP is the highest in terms of molecular content and includes cytokines, prostaglandins and fructose [15], while the prostate gland secretions are rich in lipids, citrate and proteolytic enzymes [2]. Basic polyamines, namely, spermine, spermidine and putrescine maintain the alkalinity of the semen. Galactose, sialic acid and mucus secreted by the bulbourethral glands act as lubricants for efficient sperm transfer (Fig. 1) [7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Composition of seminal plasma including the secretions from testes, epididymis, seminal vesicles, prostate, and bulbourethral and periurethral glands

History and evolution of the study of seminal plasma proteome

In 1888, a report by C. Posner regarding the presence of proteose or propeptone (cocktail of proteolytic digested products) in SP, marked the beginning of seminal plasma proteomics (Table 1) [16, 17]. However, the first electrophoretic separation of SP proteins was in 1942 using a Tiselius apparatus, where two water-soluble fractions including one non-heat-coagulable proteose and a glycoprotein, and two water-insoluble fractions were identified. They also confirmed the content of albumin in seminal plasma to be less than 0.02% and that of nucleoprotein to be less than 0.04% [18]. In the same year, Gray and Huggins [17] reported that the 4 fractions yielded by electrophoretic separation of SP correspond to albumin, α-globulin, β-globulin, and γ-globulin of normal serum. Sensabaugh [19] was able to separate 40 peptides by SDS-PAGE, purify and characterize the semen specific protein p30, which could be used as an alternative test for the forensic identification of semen based on the detection of this protein. Thus, the foundation for the use of seminal proteins as biomarkers was established. Over the years, there has been a tremendous advance in the analytical tools used to decipher the proteome profile of human samples. These advances also enabled the identification of a large number of proteins at a much faster pace (Table 1). More than 200 peptides were detected in the SP of normal fertile men using 2D-electrophoresis, while their vasectomized counterparts lacked a series of glycoproteins. Besides, immunodetection revealed the presence of a number of serum proteins as well as prostatic acid prosphatase and creatine kinase [20]. Subsequently, Starita-Geribaldi et al. [21] developed a narrow immobilized pH gradient covering one pH unit for human SP proteomic analysis, which was followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS). These techniques increased the accuracy of differential expression analysis and identification of markers associated with impaired spermatogenesis. Separation of SP proteins from a pool of five samples by gel electrophoresis (1D and 2D) and identification either by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) or capillary liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) revealed 100 peptides and proteins [22]. A total of 923 SP proteins including proteases of extracellular origin and other proteins originating from male accessory glands were identified by LC-MS/MS from a single sample [14]. Rolland et al. [23] identified 699 proteins in SP and predicted the presence of a total of 2545 distinctive proteins by comparing their results with previous studies. From their data, the authors also confirmed the presence of proteins from testes (83), epididymis (42), seminal vesicles (7) and prostate (17). Beginning with a moving boundary electrophoresis using a Tiselius apparatus, proteomic research has undergone remarkable evolution over time with the development of high throughput technologies such as LC-MS/MS and with the inclusion of targeted proteomics and possibility to detect post-translational modifications (PTMs) in proteins to assess their functionality. Studies by various groups have recorded thousands of proteins in SP and these were consolidated by Drabovich et al. [6], amounting to 3200 in total. These studies and the advances in proteomic technologies contributed to the recent discovery of key proteins associated with male infertility [24, 25], which may be used as biomarkers for clinical application.

Proteomic signatures of seminal plasma in evaluation of male infertility

The past decade witnessed an enormous rise in the number of reports on comparative proteomics of SP to identify putative protein markers for various reproductive conditions such as infertility in general [23], obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia [6, 26], asthenozoospermia [27], prostatitis [28], oxidative-induced infertility [24, 29], varicocele [25], and prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia [30] (Table 2).

Table 2 Potential protein markers in seminal plasma under altered pathophysiology

A member of the lipocalin superfamily, prostaglandin-D synthase (PGDS) is an extracellular transport protein that includes retinol-binding protein and shows high binding affinity for specific cell receptors and small hydrophobic ligands. PGDS was reported to be associated with poor semen parameters such as decreased sperm count, percentage of motility, and percentage of normal morphology. The expression of this protein showed a gradual decrease from normal to oligospermic, azoospermic and patients who underwent vasectomy [31]. Upon further investigation, PGDS was proposed as a biomarker of obstructive azoospermia [32]. The same group developed a multiplex selected reaction monitoring (SRM) assay to detect the level of testis-expressed protein 101 (TEX101) and epididymis-expressed extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) to distinguish men with obstructive azoospermia from those with non-obstructive azoospermia (Table 2). This technique circumvented the clinical evaluation using the invasive technique of testicular biopsy [33].

A comparative proteomic study by Davalieva et al. [13] using two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) showed overexpression of 8 proteins: fibronectin, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prolactin-inducible protein (PIP), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), proteasome subunit alpha type-3 (PSMA3), cytosolic nonspecific dipeptidase (CNDP2), and galectin-3-binding protein (LGALS3BP) in the SP of azoospermic men when compared with at least one of the other studied groups (normozoospermic, asthenozoospermic and oligozoospermic). In particular, PAP was significantly overexpressed in azoospermic patients relative to all the other groups. Milardi et al. [3] evaluated the seminal proteomic profile among a pool of five men with proven fertility and proposed a panel of proteins of importance for male fertility such as semenogelin I, semenogelin II, olfactory receptor 5R1, lactoferrin, human cationic antimicrobial protein (hCAP18), spindling 1, and clusterin. Semenogelins are the main proteins responsible for the formation of a gel matrix that entraps spermatozoa into a seminal coagulum right after ejaculation. This has a particular importance for sperm function because semenogelins act as natural regulators of sperm capacitation as they prevent its premature occurrence [34]. High concentrations of semenogelins were also suggested as a biomarker in asthenozoospermic men [35]. The hCAP18 is also expressed by the epididymal epithelium and in seminal plasma at high concentrations and has a key role in the innate immunity of the male reproductive system [36].

Stress proteins such as DJ-1 were found to be differentially regulated and expressed in men with: (1) normal sperm count and abnormal morphology, (2) oligozoospermia and normal morphology, and (3) oligozoospermia and abnormal morphology, when compared to normozoospermic samples. These proteins may serve as a potential biomarkers to identify the underlying mechanisms that lead to poor sperm quality in these men [37]. Wang et al. [27] proposed that the downregulation of DJ-1 induces oxidative stress, thereby affecting the quality of semen in asthenozoospermic men. A comparative proteomics study using semen samples with normal or high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) indicated that the LGALS3BP, which is responsible for host defense against viruses and tumor cells, was exclusively detected in the group with normal ROS levels. Thus, LGALS3BP could be a candidate marker for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer of the reproductive tract [29]. Further in-depth investigation involving SP from fertile and infertile men with varying levels of ROS (low, medium and high) showed that the expression profile of proteins involved in PTMs, protein folding and transport were severely altered in the infertile group. Furthermore, two proteins were identified as putative markers: the membrane metalloendopeptidase (MME) and family with sequence similarity 3 member D (FAM3D).The former was consistently overexpressed in all three groups of infertile men, whereas the latter was uniquely expressed in the fertile group [24]. A combined sample pre-fractionation using peptide ligand library columns followed by shotgun nano-LC-MS/MS analysis of the tryptic peptides corresponding to each elution fraction, enabled the identification of 669 proteins. Among those, three important proteins: transketolase-like protein 1 (TKTL1), L-lactate dehydrogense C chain (LDHC) and phosphoglycerate kinase 2 (PGK2), were also proposed as biomarkers of fertility [23].

SP has also a high expression of cytokines that are associated with male infertility [38]. In the male genital tract, there is a tissue-specific secretion of cytokines and chemokines into the SP. The epididymis mainly secretes soluble HLA-G and CD52g, whereas the seminal vesicles are the principal source of prostaglandins and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β). The prostate also produces TGF-β and other bioactive components including small RNAs. The penile urethra is primarily responsible for the production of local antibodies in the male genital tract [5, 39, 40].

The studies presented in our review provide an evidence that SP proteome is vast and may have a role beyond spermatozoa transport. Although these mechanisms are not completely understood, the identified proteins may serve as biomarkers for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic tools. For instance, a testis-secreted acrosomal vesicle protein 1 (ACRV1, SP-10) associated with sperm-zona binding and penetration [41] has been the basis for the development of an immunodiagnostic home test, SpermCheck Fertility® (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), to detect the sperm concentration in semen. In this qualitative test, the number of sperm is directly proportional to the signal strength of ELISA assays for the measurement of SP-10 [42]. Similar approaches can be used to develop new technologies for the clinical evaluation of male infertility.

Seminal exosomal proteins and their role in sperm function

SP contains a heterogeneous population of microvesicles called exosomes. Seminal exosomes include mainly tetraspanin CD9-positive epididymosomes and prostasomes (Fig. 2), which account for 3% of the total protein complement of SP [43]. Transcription and translation are almost silent in mature spermatozoa due to DNA packaging during spermatogenesis. Besides the PTMs that occur during sperm maturation along the male reproductive tract, exosomes play an important role in supporting sperm functions [44]. Exosomes are RNA and protein containing microvesicles, which like viruses, originate from inside the cells and are released into the extracellular compartment. This is in contrast to other microvesicles that are pinched off from the plasma membrane [45]. Genetic material can be delivered into target cells via exosomes including protein-encoding mRNAs and small noncoding RNAs involved in regulation of gene expression [46,47,48]. A recent comprehensive proteomic analysis by Yang et al. [49] reported a total of 1474 proteins in human seminal exosome samples. Through gene ontology (GO) analysis, the authors showed that seminal exosomes-associated proteins were mostly linked to ‘exosomes,’ ‘cytoplasm,’ and ‘cytosol’, which are involved in biologic processes such as metabolism, energy pathways, protein metabolism, cell growth and maintenance, and transport [49]. SP transmits a plethora of proteins to the spermatozoa via exosomal-binding that are important for maturation and protection of the male gametes, as well as for the maintenance of their function.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Role of seminal extracellular vesicles, epididymosomes and prostasomes, and their proteome on spermatozoa function

Epididymosomes have a complex proteome and their composition changes along the epididymis. Moreover, the epididymosomes present in the ejaculate do not significantly contribute to the population of exosomes present in the ejaculate. These suggests that epididymosomes transfer their contents to the spermatozoa during their transit through the epididymis. Proteins associated to epididymosomes are not processed through the endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi apparatus secretory vesicles, have unusual glycosylation and lack N-terminal signal peptides. Additionally, some of them are strongly glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored to these membranous vesicles. There are basically two subpopulations of epididymosomes, those enriched with epididymal sperm binding protein 1 (ELSPBP1) and the CD9-positive epididymosomes (Fig. 2). ELSPBP1, first described as HE12 in humans, was associated with dead and dying spermatozoa in the ejaculated semen. This protein in association with biliverdin reductase A (BLVRA) uses NADPH as a proton donor to reduce biliverdin to bilirubin. Bilirubin then uses ROS to regenerate biliverdin in the presence of Zn2+. Thus, the binding of ELSPBP1/BLVRA complex to dying spermatozoa acts as a scavenger of ROS generated by dying spermatozoa, thereby protecting the surviving spermatozoa from oxidative damage [50, 51]. CD9-positive epididymosomes preferentially bind to or fuse with live spermatozoa and are involved in epididymal sperm maturation. HE5, which is specifically expressed by the human epididymis, is also a human lymphocyte surface protein (CD52) and is GPI-anchored to the sperm surface during the epididymal transit. It is proposed that this protein is transferred to the sperm surface by epididymosomes and is thought to be associated with human immunological infertility [50, 52]. Other epididymosome-associated proteins that are also transferred to sperm surface during epididymal maturation include: enzymes of the polyol pathway, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), type 5 glutathione peroxidase (GPX5), the sperm adhesion molecule 1 (SPAM1 or PH-20), and the zona pellucida binding protein P34H. Two enzymes of polyol pathway, aldose reductase and sorbitol dehydrogenase are responsible for the generation of fructose by oxidation of sorbitol to fuel sperm motility. MIF is a cytokine that modulates sperm motility during the transit along the male reproductive tract and GPX5 GPX5 might protect the transiting epididymal spermatozoa against OS. Finally, SPAM1 and P34H play a key role in sperm-egg binding [53].

Prostasomes are well-characterized markers of SP function. Examples of prostasomes in human SP include PAP, prostate specific antigen (PSA), type 2 transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2), prostate-specific transglutaminase (pTGase) and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) (Fig. 2) [54, 55]. These seminal exosomes transfer Ca2+ signaling tools namely, progesterone receptors, cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose (cADPR)-synthesizing enzymes, ryanodine receptors (RyRs), and other related molecules to the sperm neck, thus triggering sperm motility and acrosome reaction [56]. By binding to sperm cells, these proteins are able to control the timing of early and late capacitation events to avoid premature induction of the acrosome reaction. Studies have reported that prostasomes help to increase intracellular cAMP which then stimulates protein kinase A (PKA) to indirectly induce tyrosine phosphorylation to activate capacitation and reorganization of plasma membrane in the spermatozoon [57,58,59,60,61]. In vitro studies have shown that prostasomes can be responsible for transferring cholesterol to spermatozoa during end-stage capacitation [60, 62]. In addition, interactions of prostasomes within the female reproductive tract cause local modulation of the immune system and hence, prevent spermatozoa from being phagocytosed, damaged or killed by the attacks of neutrophil granulocytes [62].

Protective role of seminal plasma molecules in fertilization

In semen, both leukocytes and immature/abnormal spermatozoa are intracellular sources of ROS. If uncontrolled, ROS can lead to damages in spermatozoa proteins, lipids and DNA. Spermatozoa are particularly susceptible to oxidative damage due to the high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in their plasma membrane and also the limited inner antioxidant system [24, 63, 64]. However, SP has an efficient antioxidant defense system that protects spermatozoa during ejaculation and the first steps of their journey through the female reproductive tract [65]. SP has a great repertoire of inflammatory molecules obtained from the testes, including macrophages, somatic cells (Leydig and Sertoli cells), spermatogonia, leukocytes and mesenchymal cells [66, 67]. The secretion of seminal cytokines is also carried out by immunocompetent cells in various pathogenic conditions including leukocytospermia [68]. Cytokines are small proteins that are important in cell signaling and play a key role in the regulation of fertilization. The accumulation of cytokines and their soluble receptors such as interleukins (IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, IL-18), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and 2 (TNFR1/2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the SP has been observed in semen samples of both fertile and infertile men [38, 66, 67, 69]. A study by Seshadri et al. [69] confirms that cytokines seldom act in isolation and may affect sperm function directly or indirectly by acting as members of a network with other cytokines. Their results also suggest that the cytokines may not originate from the testis as their level is observed to be augmented in the obstructed azoospermic group.

SP can modulate immune responses in the male and female reproductive tracts (Table 3). During intercourse, a normal influx of leukocytes is important for the interaction of spermatozoa with the female tract [70]. This early leukocyte attack allows the female reproductive system to eliminate spermatozoa with poor fertilizing capacity based on poor DNA integrity [71]. However, the most capable spermatozoa to fertilize have to escape these harsh uterine conditions very quickly to avoid immune opposition by the female reproductive tract after their detachment from the SP microenvironment [71,72,73]. TGF-β in human seminal plasma plays a key role in inducing proinflammatory cytokine synthesis and leukocyte recruitment by the cervical cells [74]. Some of the proinflammatory cytokines produced by human cervical and vaginal epithelial cells after interaction with SP include granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-1, IL-6 and IL-8. They also produce some chemokines, such as the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [75, 76]. These molecules contribute to the recruitment of macrophages, dendritic cells and lymphocytes into the epithelial layers and deeper stromal tissues [5, 70, 76].

Table 3 Seminal plasma proteins in spermatozoa protection, transport and interaction with the female reproductive tract

Additional studies have shown that the role of SP is not only restricted to the cervix, but it also extends to the uterus [76, 77]. Uterine receptivity is entirely dependent on a healthy uterine environment to encourage embryonic implantation [78]. Seminal constituents bound to the post-acrosomal region of the sperm head are carried in conjunction with the sperm to the higher parts of the female tract. Along with the peristaltic contractions transporting macromolecular materials, unique vascular connections facilitate the transport of progesterone and inflammatory mediators from the cervix to the endometrial tissue [40]. IL-1 and TNF-α have been found to stimulate progesterone and prostaglandin synthesis to regulate gonadotropin secretion for corpus luteum function [79]. Seminal fluid helps in the regulation of endometrial tissue remodeling and uterine receptivity by recruiting leukocytes, especially macrophages. These are further mediated by adhesion ligands such as integrins, selectins, cadherins and immunoglobulins, thereby losing the inhibitory components that may act as a barrier to an attaching embryo [40, 76, 80]. The expression of epididymal protein, E-cadherin in the SP was found to be responsible for sperm-oocyte adhesion [81]. Clinical studies on SP insemination in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have shown a significant improvement in embryo transfer after exposure to SP [82, 83]. Human studies indicated that when embryos were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF, blastocyst development rate was increased, leading to increased cell numbers both in the inner cell mass and trophectoderm [84]. Thus, SP plays a key role in spermatozoa protection from oxidative damage, spermatozoa function and interaction with the female reproductive tract. However, further studies are needed to clarify the role of SP in fertilization and contribution to a successful pregnancy using ART.

Seminal plasma as a source of biomarkers and targeted drug delivery

SP is a complex body fluid, containing a large diversity of proteins. The exact number of proteins expressed by the SP is not known, but possibly up to 10,000. SP proteomics is regarded as a great resource for the discovery of potential biomarkers to improve diagnosis or classification of a wide range of male reproductive disorders. However, the major limitations are the complexity of SP proteome, the inter- and intra-individual variation and the probability of the low abundant proteins to be masked in the presence of very high abundant proteins like semenogelins. This implies that the discovery of low abundance proteins with a critical role in reproductive functions could be facilitated by a selective removal of high abundant proteins using specific methods such as immunoprecipitation. For instance, the removal of the top high abundant proteins from blood by a single-step purification method using a mixer of high-specificity polyclonal antibodies (MARS) is commercially available [85]. Additionally, extracellular vesicles such as exosomes were isolated from small volumes of human blood plasma by Protein Organic Solvent Precipitation (PROSPR) [86]. Similar methods should be applied to SP samples to clarify the role of low abundance SP proteins in male fertility.

Seminal exosomal vesicles may be developed for targeted delivery of drugs, vaccines and anti-virals. Recent in vivo studies indicated specific cell tropism by exosomes, which based on their unique characteristics and origin, can be targeted to tissues and/or organs [87,88,89,90]. Intravenous injection of exosomes expressing a neuron-targeting protein on their surface into mice was reported to elicit specific gene knockdown in the brain [91]. Furthermore, in murine model of Parkinson’s disease, administration of autologous macrophage-derived exosomes loaded with catalase, produced potent anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects [92]. Modification of exosomal membrane is feasible and can be developed to enhance their targeting capability and specificity [93]. It was possible to target exosomes expressing an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-binding peptide to tumor cells [94]. The major envelope of Epstein–Barr-Virus protein gp350 incorporated into the exosomal membrane target B cells and resulted in improved interaction between helper T cells and B cells [95]. Exosome-mediated therapy may ultimately lead to in vitro maturation of gametes and improvement of ART outcomes. However, more studies need to be conducted to support these early-stage discoveries and develop an interesting technique from the clinical point of view.


Diagnostic tools to assess male infertility are limited, particularly for investigation of idiopathic infertility. Therefore routine semen analysis is still the basis for evaluation of a subject’s fertility status. However, as semen analysis offers a rough assessment of male fertility, additional diagnostic tools are needed in a clinical setting. Emerging ‘omics studies’ in general and high throughput proteomics of SP in particular, holds promise for the development of novel biomarkers. These biomarkers could be useful in the evaluation of natural fertility, differentiating between the various infertility etiologies, and predicting ART success. Nevertheless, a closer look into the seminal exosomes, natural nanocarriers, could bring new insights for targeted drug delivery for new therapies.



Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis


Assisted reproductive technologies




Cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose


Cytosolic nonspecific dipeptidase


Extracellular matrix protein 1


Family with sequence similarity 3 member D


Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor


Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor


Gene ontology




Type 5 glutathione peroxidase


Human cationic antimicrobial protein


Intracytoplasmic sperm injection






In vitro fertilization


Liquid chromatography


Lactate dehydrogenase C


Galectin 3 binding protein


Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization


Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1


Macrophage migration inhibitory factor


Macrophage inflammatory protein


Membrane metalloendopeptidase


Mass spectrometry


Tandem mass spectrometry


Prostatic acid phosphatase


Prostaglandin-D synthase


Phosphoglycerate kinase 2


Prolactin-inducible protein


Protein kinase A


Prostate specific antigen


Prostate stem cell antigen


Proteasome subunit alpha type-3


Prostate-specific transglutaminase


Post-translational modifications


Polyunsaturated fatty acids


Reactive oxygen species


Ryanodine receptors


Seminal plasma


Sperm adhesion molecule 1


Testis-expressed protein 101


Transforming growth factor beta


Transketolase-like protein 1


Type 2 transmembrane serine protease


Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 or 2


Tumor necrosis factor-alpha




  1. Gonzales GF, Villena A. True corrected seminal fructose level: a better marker of the function of seminal vesicles in infertile men. Int J Androl. 2001;24:255–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drake RR, White KY, Fuller TW, Igwe E, Clements MA, Nyalwidhe JO, Given RW, Lance RS, Semmes OJ. Clinical collection and protein properties of expressed prostatic secretions as a source for biomarkers of prostatic disease. J Proteome. 2009;72:907–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Milardi D, Grande G, Vincenzoni F, Messana I, Pontecorvi A, De Marinis L, Castagnola M, Marana R. Proteomic approach in the identification of fertility pattern in seminal plasma of fertile men. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:67–73. e1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Primakoff P, Myles DG. Penetration, adhesion, and fusion in mammalian sperm-egg interaction. Sci. 2002;296:2183–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robertson SA. Seminal plasma and male factor signalling in the female reproductive tract. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;322:43–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Drabovich AP, Saraon P, Jarvi K, Diamandis EP. Seminal plasma as a diagnostic fluid for male reproductive system disorders. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:278–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Verze P, Cai T, Lorenzetti S. The role of the prostate in male fertility, health and disease. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13:379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferens-Sieczkowska M, Kowalska B, Kratz EM. Seminal plasma glycoproteins in male infertility and prostate diseases: is there a chance for glyco-biomarkers? Biomarkers. 2013;18:10–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lenzi A, Picardo M, Gandini L, Dondero F. Lipids of the sperm plasma membrane: from polyunsaturated fatty acids considered as markers of sperm function to possible scavenger therapy. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2:246–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Owen DH, Katz DF. A review of the physical and chemical properties of human semen and the formulation of a semen simulant. J Androl. 2005;26:459–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li HG, Huang SY, Zhou H, Liao AH, Xiong CL. Quick recovery and characterization of cell-free DNA in seminal plasma of normozoospermia and azoospermia: implications for non-invasive genetic utilities. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:703–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu W, Hu Z, Qin Y, Dong J, Dai J, Lu C, Zhang W, Shen H, Xia Y, Wang X. Seminal plasma microRNAs: potential biomarkers for spermatogenesis status. Mol Hum Reprod. 2012;18:489–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davalieva K, Kiprijanovska S, Noveski P, Plaseski T, Kocevska B, Broussard C, Plaseska-Karanfilska D. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma in men with different spermatogenic impairment. Andrologia. 2012;44:256–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pilch B, Mann M. Large-scale and high-confidence proteomic analysis of human seminal plasma. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzales GF. Function of seminal vesicles and their role on male fertility. Asian J Androl. 2001;3:251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Posner C. Berl Klin Wochenschr, vol. 25; 1888. p. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gray S, Huggins C. Electrophoretic analysis of human semen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1942;50:351–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross V, Moore DH, Miller EG. Proteins of human seminal plasma. J Biol Chem. 1942;144:667–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sensabaugh GF. Isolation and characterization of a semen-specific protein from human seminal plasma: a potential new marker for semen identification. J Forensic Sci. 1978;23:106–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Edwards JJ, Tollaksen SL, Anderson NG. Proteins of human semen. I. Two-dimensional mapping of human seminal fluid. Clin Chem. 1981;27:1335–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Starita-Geribaldi M, Roux F, Garin J, Chevallier D, Fenichel P, Pointis G. Development of narrow immobilized pH gradients covering one pH unit for human seminal plasma proteomic analysis. Proteomics. 2003;3:1611–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fung KY, Morris C, Sathe S, Sack R, Duncan MW. Characterization of the in vivo forms of lacrimal-specific proline-rich proteins in human tear fluid. Proteomics. 2004;4:3953–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rolland AD, Lavigne R, Dauly C, Calvel P, Kervarrec C, Freour T, Evrard B, Rioux-Leclercq N, Auger J, Pineau C. Identification of genital tract markers in the human seminal plasma using an integrative genomics approach. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:199–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Agarwal A, Ayaz A, Samanta L, Sharma R, Assidi M, Abuzenadah AM, Sabanegh E. Comparative proteomic network signatures in seminal plasma of infertile men as a function of reactive oxygen species. Clin Proteomics. 2015;12:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Del Giudice PT, Belardin LB, Camargo M, Zylbersztejn DS, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KH, Bertolla RP, Cedenho AP. Determination of testicular function in adolescents with varicocoele - a proteomics approach. Androl. 2016;4:447–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamakawa K, Yoshida K, Nishikawa H, Kato T, Iwamoto T. Comparative analysis of interindividual variations in the seminal plasma proteome of fertile men with identification of potential markers for azoospermia in infertile patients. J Androl. 2007;28:858–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Wang J, Zhang HR, Shi HJ, Ma D, Zhao HX, Lin B, Li RS. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma from asthenozoospermia patients reveals proteins that affect oxidative stress responses and semen quality. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:484–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kagedan D, Lecker I, Batruch I, Smith C, Kaploun I, Lo K, Grober E, Diamandis EP, Jarvi KA. Characterization of the seminal plasma proteome in men with prostatitis by mass spectrometry. Clin Proteomics. 2012;9:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma R, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, Du Plessis SS, Gopalan B, Willard B, Yadav SP, Sabanegh E. Proteomic analysis of seminal fluid from men exhibiting oxidative stress. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang L, Nyalwidhe JO, Guo S, Drake RR, Semmes OJ. Targeted identification of metastasis-associated cell-surface sialoglycoproteins in prostate cancer. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;M110(007294):10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Diamandis EP, Arnett WP, Foussias G, Pappas H, Ghandi S, Melegos DN, Mullen B, Yu H, Srigley J, Jarvi K. Seminal plasma biochemical markers and their association with semen analysis findings. Urol. 1999;53:596–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Heshmat SM, Mullen JB, Jarvi KA, Soosaipillai A, Diamandis EP, Hamilton RJ, Lo KC. Seminal plasma lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase: a potential new marker for the diagnosis of obstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2008;179:1077–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Drabovich AP, Jarvi K, Diamandis EP. Verification of male infertility biomarkers in seminal plasma by multiplex selected reaction monitoring assay. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10:M110.004127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lamirande E, Yoshida K, Yoshiike M, Iwamoto T, Gagnon C. Semenogelin, the main protein of semen coagulum, inhibits human sperm capacitation by interfering with the superoxide anion generated during this process. J Androl. 2001;22:672–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao C, Huo R, Wang FQ, Lin M, Zhou ZM, Sha JH. Identification of several proteins involved in regulation of sperm motility by proteomic analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:436–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Malm J, Sørensen O, Persson T, Frohm-Nilsson M, Johansson B, Bjartell A, Lilja H, Ståhle-Bäckdahl M, Borregaard N, Egesten A. The human cationic antimicrobial protein (hCAP-18) is expressed in the epithelium of human epididymis, is present in seminal plasma at high concentrations, and is attached to spermatozoa. Infect Immun. 2000;68:4297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma R, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, Jesudasan R, Gopalan B, Willard B, Yadav SP, Sabanegh E. Functional proteomic analysis of seminal plasma proteins in men with various semen parameters. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Havrylyuk A, Chopyak V, Boyko Y, Kril I, Kurpisz M. Cytokines in the blood and semen of infertile patients. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2015;40:337–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Anderson DJ, Politch JA. Role of seminal plasma in human female reproductive failure: immunomodulation, inflammation, and infections. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;868:159–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Robertson SA, Bromfield JJ, Glynn DJ, Sharkey DJ, Jasper MJ. Actions of seminal plasma cytokines in priming female reproductive tract receptivity for embryo implantation. In: Mor G, editor. Immunology of pregnancy. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 148–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Foster JA, Klotz KL, Flickinger CJ, Thomas TS, Wright RM, Castillo JR, Herr JC. Human SP-10: acrosomal distribution, processing, and fate after the acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod. 1994;51:1222–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Coppola MA, Klotz KL, Kim KA, Cho HY, Kang J, Shetty J, Howards SS, Flickinger CJ, Herr JC. SpermCheck fertility, an immunodiagnostic home test that detects normozoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:853–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Aalberts M, van Dissel-Emiliani FM, van Adrichem NP, van Wijnen M, Wauben MH, Stout TA, Stoorvogel W. Identification of distinct populations of prostasomes that differentially express prostate stem cell antigen, annexin A1, and GLIPR2 in humans. Biol Reprod. 2012;86:82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Machtinger R, Laurent LC, Baccarelli AA. Extracellular vesicles: roles in gamete maturation, fertilization and embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:182–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Colombo M, Raposo G, Thery C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Bossios A, Sjostrand M, Lee JJ, Lotvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–U72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nolte-‘t Hoen EN, Buermans HP, Waasdorp M, Stoorvogel W, Wauben MH, Hoen PA T. Deep sequencing of RNA from immune cell-derived vesicles uncovers the selective incorporation of small non-coding RNA biotypes with potential regulatory functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:9272–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yanez-Mo M, Siljander PRM, Andreu Z, Zavec AB, Borras FE, Buzas EI, Buzas K, Casal E, Cappello F, Carvalho J, et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:27066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang C, Guo WB, Zhang WS, Bian J, Yang JK, Zhou QZ, Chen MK, Peng W, Qi T, Wang CY, Liu CD. Comprehensive proteomics analysis of exosomes derived from human seminal plasma. Androl. 2017;5:1007–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sullivan R. Epididymosomes: a heterogeneous population of microvesicles with multiple functions in sperm maturation and storage. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:726–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. D'Amours O, Frenette G, Bordeleau LJ, Allard N, Leclerc P, Blondin P, Sullivan R. Epididymosomes transfer epididymal sperm binding protein 1 (ELSPBP1) to dead spermatozoa during epididymal transit in bovine. Biol Reprod. 2012;87:94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Aalberts M, Stout TA, Stoorvogel W. Prostasomes: extracellular vesicles from the prostate. Reprod. 2014;147:R1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sullivan R. Epididymosomes: a heterogeneous population of microvesicles with multiple functions in sperm maturation and storage. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:726.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Poliakov A, Spilman M, Dokland T, Amling CL, Mobley JA. Structural heterogeneity and protein composition of exosome-like vesicles (prostasomes) in human semen. Prostate. 2009;69:159–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Utleg AG, Yi EC, Xie T, Shannon P, White JT, Goodlett DR, Hood L, Lin B. Proteomic analysis of human prostasomes. Prostate. 2003;56:150–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Park KH, Kim BJ, Kang J, Nam TS, Lim JM, Kim HT, Park JK, Kim YG, Chae SW, Kim UH. Ca2+ signaling tools acquired from prostasomes are required for progesterone-induced sperm motility. Sci Signal. 2011;4:ra31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bailey JL. Factors regulating sperm capacitation. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010;56:334–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fraser LR. The “switching on” of mammalian spermatozoa: molecular events involved in promotion and regulation of capacitation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77:197–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Harrison RA, Miller NG. cAMP-dependent protein kinase control of plasma membrane lipid architecture in boar sperm. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55:220–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pons-Rejraji H, Artonne C, Sion B, Brugnon F, Canis M, Janny L, Grizard G. Prostasomes: inhibitors of capacitation and modulators of cellular signalling in human sperm. Int J Androl. 2011;34:568–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Visconti PE, Westbrook VA, Chertihin O, Demarco I, Sleight S, Diekman AB. Novel signaling pathways involved in sperm acquisition of fertilizing capacity. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;53:133–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Aalberts M, Sostaric E, Wubbolts R, Wauben MW, Nolte-‘t Hoen EN, Gadella BM, Stout TA, Stoorvogel W. Spermatozoa recruit prostasomes in response to capacitation induction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1834;2013:2326–35.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Henkel RR. Leukocytes and oxidative stress: dilemma for sperm function and male fertility. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:43–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Relationship between oxidative stress, semen characteristics, and clinical diagnosis in men undergoing infertility investigation. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:459–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. WS O, Chen H, Chow PH. Male genital tract antioxidant enzymes--their ability to preserve sperm DNA integrity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;250:80–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Maegawa M, Kamada M, Irahara M, Yamamoto S, Yoshikawa S, Kasai Y, Ohmoto Y, Gima H, Thaler CJ, Aono T. A repertoire of cytokines in human seminal plasma. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;54:33–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Politch JA, Tucker L, Bowman FP, Anderson DJ. Concentrations and significance of cytokines and other immunologic factors in semen of healthy fertile men. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2928–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Fraczek M, Czernikiewicz A, Kurpisz M. Cytokines and oxidative stress in the germ line. In: Agarwal A, Aitken RJ, Alvarez JG, editors. Studies on Men’s health and fertility. Totowa: Humana press; 2012. p. 179–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  69. Seshadri S, Bates M, Vince G, Jones DI. The role of cytokine expression in different subgroups of subfertile men. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009;62:275–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Sharkey DJ, Tremellen KP, Jasper MJ, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Robertson SA. Seminal fluid induces leukocyte recruitment and cytokine and chemokine mRNA expression in the human cervix after coitus. J Immunol. 2012;188:2445–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Velando A, Torres R, Alonso-Alvarez C. Avoiding bad genes: oxidatively damaged DNA in germ line and mate choice. BioEssays. 2008;30:1212–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bromfield JJ, Schjenken JE, Chin PY, Care AS, Jasper MJ, Robertson SA. Maternal tract factors contribute to paternal seminal fluid impact on metabolic phenotype in offspring. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:2200–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Suarez SS, Pacey AA. Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:23–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sharkey DJ, Macpherson AM, Tremellen KP, Mottershead DG, Gilchrist RB, Robertson SA. TGF-beta mediates proinflammatory seminal fluid signaling in human cervical epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2012;189:1024–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sharkey DJ, Macpherson AM, Tremellen KP, Robertson SA. Seminal plasma differentially regulates inflammatory cytokine gene expression in human cervical and vaginal epithelial cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13:491–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gutsche S, von Wolff M, Strowitzki T, Thaler CJ. Seminal plasma induces mRNA expression of IL-1beta, IL-6 and LIF in endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9:785–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Robertson SA, Mau VJ, Hudson SN, Tremellen KP. Cytokine-leukocyte networks and the establishment of pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;37:438–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Brosens JJ, Salker MS, Teklenburg G, Nautiyal J, Salter S, Lucas ES, Steel JH, Christian M, Chan YW, Boomsma CM, et al. Uterine selection of human embryos at implantation. Sci Rep. 2014;4:3894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Pate JL. Involvement of immune cells in regulation of ovarian function. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1995;49:365–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:731–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Marin-Briggiler CI, Veiga MF, Matos ML, Echeverria MF, Furlong LI, Vazquez-Levin MH. Expression of epithelial cadherin in the human male reproductive tract and gametes and evidence of its participation in fertilization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:561–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Friedler S, Ben-Ami I, Gidoni Y, Strassburger D, Kasterstein E, Maslansky B, Komarovsy D, Bern O, Ron-El R, Raziel A. Effect of seminal plasma application to the vaginal vault in in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles-a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:907–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Chicea R, Ispasoiu F, Focsa M. Seminal plasma insemination during ovum-pickup--a method to increase pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI procedure. A pilot randomized trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:569–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Robertson SA, Sjoblom C, Jasper MJ, Norman RJ, Seamark RF. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes glucose transport and blastomere viability in murine preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 2001;64:1206–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Bellei E, Bergamini S, Monari E, Fantoni LI, Cuoghi A, Ozben T, Tomasi A. High-abundance proteins depletion for serum proteomic analysis: concomitant removal of non-targeted proteins. Amino Acids. 2011;40:145–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Gallart-Palau X, Serra A, Wong ASW, Sandin S, Lai MK, Chen CP, Kon OL, Sze SK. Extracellular vesicles are rapidly purified from human plasma by PRotein organic solvent PRecipitation (PROSPR). Sci Rep. 2015;5:14664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Zomer A, Maynard C, Verweij Frederik J, Kamermans A, Schäfer R, Beerling E, Schiffelers Raymond M, de Wit E, Berenguer J, Ellenbroek Saskia Inge J, et al. Vivo imaging reveals extracellular vesicle-mediated Phenocopying of metastatic behavior. Cell. 2015;161:1046–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Fruhbeis C, Frohlich D, Kuo WP, Amphornrat J, Thilemann S, Saab AS, Kirchhoff F, Mobius W, Goebbels S, Nave KA, et al. Neurotransmitter-triggered transfer of exosomes mediates oligodendrocyte-neuron communication. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Kim MS, Haney MJ, Zhao Y, Mahajan V, Deygen I, Klyachko NL, Inskoe E, Piroyan A, Sokolsky M, Okolie O, et al. Development of exosome-encapsulated paclitaxel to overcome MDR in cancer cells. Nanomedicine. 2016;12:655–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ridder K, Sevko A, Heide J, Dams M, Rupp AK, Macas J, Starmann J, Tjwa M, Plate KH, Sultmann H, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of functional RNA in the tumor microenvironment. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e1008371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhang Y, Chopp M, Meng Y, Katakowski M, Xin H, Mahmood A, Xiong Y. Effect of exosomes derived from multipluripotent mesenchymal stromal cells on functional recovery and neurovascular plasticity in rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:856–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Haney MJ, Klyachko NL, Zhaoa YL, Gupta R, Plotnikova EG, He ZJ, Patel T, Piroyan A, Sokolsky M, Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for Parkinson's disease therapy. J Control Release. 2015;207:18–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Gajos-Michniewicz A, Duechler M, Czyz M. MiRNA in melanoma-derived exosomes. Cancer Lett. 2014;347:29–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Ohno S, Takanashi M, Sudo K, Ueda S, Ishikawa A, Matsuyama N, Fujita K, Mizutani T, Ohgi T, Ochiya T, et al. Systemically injected exosomes targeted to EGFR deliver antitumor microRNA to breast cancer cells. Mol Ther. 2013;21:185–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ruiss R, Jochum S, Mocikat R, Hammerschmidt W, Zeidler R. EBV-gp350 confers B-cell tropism to tailored exosomes and is a neo-antigen in normal and malignant B cells--a new option for the treatment of B-CLL. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Robertson SA, Guerin LR, Bromfield JJ, Branson KM, Ahlstrom AC, Care AS. Seminal fluid drives expansion of the CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell pool and induces tolerance to paternal alloantigens in mice. Biol Reprod. 2009;80:1036–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Zenclussen AC, Hammerling GJ. Cellular regulation of the uterine microenvironment that enables embryo implantation. Front Immunol. 2015;6:321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Jasper MJ, Tremellen KP, Robertson SA. Primary unexplained infertility is associated with reduced expression of the T-regulatory cell transcription factor Foxp3 in endometrial tissue. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006;12:301–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Tremellen KP, Seamark RF, Robertson SA. Seminal transforming growth factor beta1 stimulates granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor production and inflammatory cell recruitment in the murine uterus. Biol Reprod. 1998;58:1217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Authors wish to thank Dr. Damayanthi Durairajanayagam, PhD (MARA University of Technology, Malaysia) for her help in reviewing and editing this manuscript.


Financial support for this study was provided by the American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA. RP thanks Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for the award of senior research fellowship (09/1036/0005/2016 EMR-I). Tania R. Dias was supported by “Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia” (FCT, SFRH/BD/109284/2015) and Fulbright Program (E0585639).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AA conceived the idea, provided guidance and edited the article for submission. RP wrote the manuscript. LS designed the study, compiled the information, helped with the writing, reviewing and editing. TRD helped in reorganizing the structure of the manuscript and tables, edited the text and introduced new information. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Agarwal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samanta, L., Parida, R., Dias, T.R. et al. The enigmatic seminal plasma: a proteomics insight from ejaculation to fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 16, 41 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: