Open Access

Interaction between common variants of FTO and MC4R is associated with risk of PCOS

  • Huiqin Yuan1,
  • Guoping Zhu1,
  • Fang Wang1,
  • Xiang Wang2,
  • Huihui Guo2 and
  • Mo Shen3Email author
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology201513:55

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0050-z

Received: 26 January 2015

Accepted: 23 May 2015

Published: 2 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common and complex endocrine-metabolic disease. One of the well-documented characteristics of PCOS is obesity or overweightness. It is possible to be genetically predisposed to becoming obese or overweight, and several potentially causative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), such as rs9939609 (A/T) in the fat mass, and obesity-associated gene (FTO) and rs17782313 (T/C) in the melanocortin-4 receptor gene (MC4R), have been investigated. Further investigation of association between obesity-associated SNPs and PCOS susceptibility will contribute to a better understanding of the disease.

Methods

In the present study, we enrolled 733 patients with PCOS and 892 control subjects. The common variants FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 were genotyped and their relationship with obesity-related traits was evaluated.

Results

Rs9939609 and rs17782313 are associated with PCOS and obesity-related traits and profiles. The association found between PCOS and FTO rs9939609 (p = 0.0302) was attenuated after adjustment for BMI (p = 0.187). MC4R rs17782313 did not confer an increased risk for PCOS (p = 0.368) even after adjustments (p = 0.715). Interestingly, the interaction of FTO and MC4R polymorphisms was more significantly associated with PCOS (p = 0.031, adjusted for age and BMI). The FTO variant rs9939609 is associated with Chinese women with PCOS; however, this association is affected by BMI.

Conclusions

The combined pathogenic effect of FTO and MC4R polymorphisms indicates a direct role of the interaction between FTO and MC4R polymorphisms in the development of PCOS.

Keyword

FTO MC4R Genetic association study Polycystic ovary syndrome

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), which affects 6 to 8 % women of reproductive age, is diagnosed by clinical and/or biochemical androgen excess, menstrual irregularity and polycystic ovaries. Additionally, PCOS patients are characterized by an increased risk of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and overweightness/obesity [14]. Fifty percent of PCOS patients are overweight or obese [5], and increasing evidence supports obesity as being an important factor in the etiology of PCOS [6, 7]. The development of obesity is affected by both genetic factors and environmental aspects, which is similar to the development of PCOS [810]. It is possible that a shared genetic predisposition contributes to their co-occurrence. Scrutinizing obesity-associated genes in PCOS patients may help to explain the etiology of both obesity and PCOS, and identification of susceptibility genes for either condition has increased with the aim of eliminating the effects of obesity in PCOS.

The fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO), located on chromosome 16q12.2, has been identified by large-scale genome-wide association studies and is recognized to be associated with both body mass index (BMI) and obesity [11, 12]. The human FTO gene is expressed in adipose tissue, muscle, the pancreas, the liver and adipose tissue, with the highest concentrations found in the hypothalamus [13]. It has been reported that the FTO gene is associated with eating habits and is important in the control of energy homeostasis [14]. rs17782313, located 188 kb downstream of MC4R, was similarly associated with obesity [15, 16]. Additionally, the MC4R gene is the most common genetic cause of human obesity in inherited morbid obesity. In vitro studies have shown that MC4R is a key regulator in central melanocortin neuronal pathways [17]. Association studies have revealed the connection between PCOS and SNPs in FTO and MC4R, respectively. Regarding FTO, rs9939609, rs1421085, rs17817449, rs8050136 have been found to be associated with PCOS, among which rs9939609 is the most extensively studied and is the only successfully replicated SNP in Han Chinese populations [1825]. In a recent genome-wide association study conducted in Han Chinese women, rs9939609 marginally achieved genome-wide significance (2.47E-03) [26]. rs17782313 and rs9939609 in MC4R were also studied in patients with PCOS [18, 19]. However, understanding obesity and overweightness, as well as PCOS, require consideration of both gene-gene interactions and case-control differences in BMI. Recently, the combined effect of FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 has been discussed in relation to obesity, breast cancer and endometrial cancer [16, 27, 28]. The above-mentioned studies revealed that an association exists between the interaction of FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 and these independent diseases, which implied a combined effect of these two SNPs. The role of rs9939609 of FTO and he rs17782313 of MC4R in women with PCOS is of interest. In the present study, we chose two representative SNPs, FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313, to investigate whether there is a combined effect of the two SNPs in the development of PCOS in a Chinese Han population.

Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (IRB reference number: 2011–21, initiating and ending dates: 06/2011–06/2014). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Subjects

A total of 733 PCOS patients were recruited from the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou from Jun 2011 to May 2014. Diagnosis of PCOS was based on the Rotterdam Consensus proposed in 2003 [29], which consists of meeting at least two of the following criteria: oligo-/ovulation, polycystic ovarian morphology, and clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism (hyperandrogenism, HA). The diagnosis of PCOS was made only when the other etiologies for hyperandrogenemia and ovulatory dysfunction were excluded, i.e., congenital adrenal hyperplasia, 21-hydroxylase deficiency, androgen-secreting tumors, Cushing’s syndrome, thyroid disease, and hyperprolactinemia. The total testosterone and mF-G scores were evaluated for hyperandrogenism.

A total of 892 women who were referred for routine physical examination or tubal factor infertility were enrolled during the same time period. All subjects in the control group had a regular menstrual cycle (26–35 days) and normal ovarian morphology. Additionally, their total testosterone and mF-G score were evaluated. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

All participants resided in Zhejiang province, were unrelated and at reproductive age with no hormonal therapy for at least 3 months. The medication and weight loss histories of all subjects were collected to exclude those who were taking hypoglycemic agents or hormonal therapy.

Clinical and biochemical measurements

Height and weight were measured while participants were dressed in underwear without shoes. BMI was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters. Obesity was defined as BMI > =28 kg/m2, and overweight was BMI > =24 kg/m2, according to Chinese criteria [30]. The waist circumference was measured midway between the lowest rib and the iliac crest. The hip circumference was the longest measurement around the hips. The waist-hip ratio (WHR) was defined as the waist circumference divided by the hip circumference.

Peripheral blood samples were tested on day 2–4 of spontaneous cycles or after cessation of bleeding from all the subjects after a 12 h overnight fast. The follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, testosterone and estradiol levels of all subjects were measured with a chemiluminescent analyzer (Beckman Access Health Company, Chaska, MN, USA).

SNP genotyping

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from all participants and collected into tubes treated with the anti-coagulant EDTA. Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with the primers for FTO rs9939609 (forward: 5′-AAGAGATGATCTCAAATCTACTTTATGAGATA-3′; reverse: 5′-TTAGAGTAACAGAGACTATCCAAGTGCATCAT-3′; annealing temperature 56 °C) and primers of MC4R rs17782313 (forward: 5′-AGGAAACAGCAGGGATAGGG-3′; reverse: 5′-TGCTGAGACAGGTTCAT AAAAAG-30, annealing temperature 56 °C). The PCR products were purified and sequenced on an ABI 3700 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Five percent of randomly selected samples were re-sequenced to validate the genotyping assays.

Statistical analysis

Continuous parameters of patients and controls are expressed as means ± SD. PLINK (v.1.07, http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink) was applied to calculate the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), allele frequency differences and genotype differences. Because there were no significant deviations of the allele frequencies from HWE (p > =0.05), genotype and allele frequencies were compared. A power calculation was performed using a Genetic Power Calculator [31]. Genetic models were divided into additive (+/+ vs. +/- vs. -/-), dominant (+/+ plus +/- vs. -/-) and recessive (+/+ vs. +/- plus -/-). Logistic regression for the disease trait was conducted to exclude the potential confounding effects of age and body mass index. The genotype models were applied for the phenotype analysis, which was compared by one-way ANOVA or student T test using SPSS software (SPSS version 16, IL, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics of subjects

Seven hundred and thirty-three PCOS patients and 892 controls were recruited, and the case-control genetic power reached 0.8 at the p = 0.001 level. Clinical measurements are presented in Table 1. In the PCOS group, 20.6 % (150/733) of subjects were obese (BMI > =28 kg/m2), while the percentage in the control group was only 10.1 % (90/892). Additionally, 44.1 % (320/733) of PCOS women were overweight or obese (BMI > =24 kg/m2), while the percentage in the control group was 21.9 % (196/892). There were no differences in the waist circumference and WHR after age and BMI were adjusted by logistic regression.
Table 1

Comparison of basic clinical characteristics between PCOS and control subjects

Characteristics

PCOS

Control

P

P adj

AGE

26.14+/−3.23

29.38+/−4.53

<0.001

-

BMI

25.16+/−5.27

22.73+/−2.97

<0.001

-

WAIST

84.75+/−10.19

78.04+/−7.38

<0.001

0.21

WHR

0.87+/−0.06

0.84+/−0.04

<0.001

0.79

FSH

6.15+/−1.71

7.47+/−2.95

<0.001

<0.001

LH

9.82+/−5.63

4.89+/−2.29

<0.001

<0.001

T

56.61+/−22.90

21.55+/−12.51

<0.001

<0.001

SD standard error, WHR waist-hip ratio, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, T testosterone, P adj adjusted P value by age and BMI in logistic regression

Allele and genotype frequency

The observed genotype distributions of the two SNPs were consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The minor allele frequency (MAF) comparison is presented in Table 2. The P value of rs9939609 is 0.030 (p = 0.187; OR = 1.27; 95 % CI: 1.02–1.58), which was attenuated after adjusting for BMI. For rs17782313, no association with PCOS was observed (p = 0.368; OR = 1.07; 95 % CI: 0.91–1.27), and it was also attenuated after adjusting for BMI. The genotype comparisons are shown Table 3. Of the three genotypes of rs9939609, the recessive genotype model was the most powerful (p = 0.020). No statistical significance was found for rs17782313.
Table 2

Allele comparison of rs9939609 and rs17782313

 

Risk allele

MAF PCOS

MAF control

P

OR 95 % CI

P adj

rs9939609

A

0.126

0.102

0.030

1.27

0.187

1.02–1.58

rs17782313

C

0.242

0.229

0.368

1.07

0.715

0.91–1.27

MAF minor allele frequency, OR odds risk, 95 % CI confidence interval, P adj, adjusted P value by BMI in logistic regression

Table 3

Allele and genotype analysis of rs9939609 and rs17782313

SNP

Comparisons

PCOS

Control

P

OR (95 % CI)

Minor/Major

Minor/Major

rs9939609 A/T

ADD

16/153/564

7/168/717

0.030

-

 

DOM

169/564

175/717

0.091

1.23 (0.97–1.56)

 

REC

16/717

7/885

0.020

2.82 (1.15–6.89)

rs17782313 C/T

ADD

35/285/413

27/354/511

0.187

-

 

DOM

320/413

381/511

0.70

1.04 (0.85–1.27)

 

REC

35/698

27/865

0.067

1.61 (0.96–2.68)

ADD additive genotype (three genotypes) study, DOM dominant genotype (homozygotes of risk allele + heterozygotes vs. homozygotes of non-risk allele) study, REC recessive genotype study (homozygotes of risk allele vs. heterozygotes + homozygotes of non-risk allele)

To eliminate the influence of BMI in the association between rs9939609, the PCOS and control subjects were further divided into an obese/overweight group and a non-obese/overweight group to eliminate the influence of BMI (Table 4). The MAF of the PCOS groups was higher (OR obese/overweight =1.31; OR non-obese/overweight =1.30); however, there was no significant difference between the PCOS and controls (P obese/overweight =0.074 and P non- obese/overweight =0.247). Moreover, there were MAF differences in the PCOS subjects with different BMIs (p = 0.005, p adjusted = 0.74), which is similar to the control group (p = 0.031, p adjusted = 0.21). The differences in the rs9939609 MAF between the PCOS and control groups could be explained by the influence of the BMI.
Table 4

rs9939609 allele comparisons of PCOS and control divided into groups according to the presence or absence of obesity

 

MAF

P

OR 95 % CI

 

PCOS

Control

Obese group

0.16

0.13

0.074

1.31 (0.95–1.67)

Non-obese group

0.12

0.09

0.247

1.30 (0.92–1.68)

P adj, adjusted P value by BMI in logistic regression. The comparison of the PCOS Obese group and Non-obese group was carried out (p = 0.005, p adj = 0.74), which was also true for the controls (p = 0.031, p adj = 0.21)

To investigate the combined effect, we also studied the participants who were simultaneously carrying the risk A and C alleles of FTO or MC4R. The subjects were divided into a group with both risk alleles (simultaneously carrying the risk A and C, PCOS vs. control = 131 vs. 121), a group carrying one risk allele (carrying the risk A or C, PCOS vs. control = 227 vs. 314), and a group with no risk alleles. Additionally, the cluster of risk alleles has been found in PCOS subjects (P group of risk allele = 0.017, OR = 1.38), which remained even after adjustments for BMI (p = 0.031).

Clinical and metabolic measurements of different genotypes in PCOS

According to the genetic analysis, there was an association between rs9939609 and PCOS, but not between rs17782313 and PCOS. Furthermore, a genetic-phenotype association study was carried out only for rs9939609. Clinical data, particularly metabolic and lipid indices, of PCOS patients are presented in Table 5 by the additive model of rs9939609. The BMI and waist circumference increased along with the presence of the risk allele A. However, the WHR was not different between the three groups. Basic clinical indices, such as FSH, LH and T, were higher in the AA group with no significant differences. The fasting insulin level of OGTT was higher among patients with the AA genotype. As the homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was introduced, the increasing trend, along with the A risk allele, was also observed.
Table 5

Clinical and metabolic data of rs9939609 PCOS patients in the additive model

 

Genotype AA

Genotype AT

Genotype TT

AGE

26.82+/−4.19

26.16+/−3.65

26.40+/−3.77

BMI a, b, c

26.49+/−4.01

25.16+/−4.23

24.70+/−4.41

WAIST a, b, c

89.74+/−12.36

85.20+/−11.98

83.19+/−10.93

WHR

0.87+/−0.04

0.86+/−0.07

0.86+/−0.07

FSH

6.27+/−1.64

6.31+/−1.61

6.27+/−1.69

LH

11.35+/−5.29

10.73+/−5.89

10.54+/−6.81

T

55.92+/−25.69

53.54+/−25.18

54.82+/−24.32

GLU-0′

5.57+/−0.73

5.33+/−0.66

5.41+/−0.82

GLU-120′

7.73+/−1.74

6.62+/−2.01

6.65+/−2.19

INS-0′ c

15.71+/−12.11

12.55+/−9.39

12.30+/−8.24

INS-120′

78.64+/−88.49

68.18+/−65.61

67.59+/−60.59

HOMA-IR

3.97+/−3.81

3.01+/−3.22

2.98+/−2.29

CHOL

4.53+/−0.90

4.51+/−0.92

4.55+/−0.90

TG

1.30+/−0.91

1.30+/−0.88

1.33+/−0.92

HDL

1.30+/−0.50

1.33+/−0.35

1.32+/−0.55

LDL

2.67+/−0.97

2.68+/−0.92

2.68+/−0.91

The data are presented as the mean ± SD

GLU glucose, INS insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model for insulin resistance, CHOL cholesterol, TG triglycerides, HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL low density lipoprotein

a the comparison of genotype AA vs. genotype AT is significantly different (p < 0.05)

b the comparison of genotype AT vs. genotype TT is significantly different (p < 0.05)

c the comparison of genotype TT vs. genotype AT is significantly different (p < 0.05)

Discussion

The mechanism underlying the association of obesity with PCOS remains unclear. Obesity is associated with hyperandrogenism and menstrual disturbance of PCOS and worsening complications, such as T2DM and hypertension [7, 4, 32]. However, some studies have argued that obesity in PCOS reflects environmental factors to a great extent [33] and that results may be influenced by BMI and other adipose-related measurements. Additionally, it is reasonable to study the pleotropic effects of BMI-associated alleles in PCOS to explain the increased BMI levels and weight in PCOS patients. The present study was designed to investigate if the common candidate genes for obesity are also related to PCOS. Additionally, the interaction of FTO and MC4R polymorphisms is associated with PCOS.

In the present study, we again observed an association between FTO and PCOS, although it was attenuated after adjustment for BMI. In one large-scale study in a Han Chinese population, the A allele for the FTO gene was significantly more frequent among PCOS patients than it was in the control population (14.1 % vs. 10.2 %; A allele vs. T allele, OR = 1.44, P = 1.86E-09), which was in accordance with our study [25, 22]. However, we did not replicate the results that FTO gene is a candidate gene for PCOS independent of BMI effects [22], potentially due to our limited sample size. The other study conducted in a Han Chinese population reported similar results. The association between FTO and PCOS was mediated by BMI [25]. Similar to rs9939609 of FTO, the rs17782313 of MC4R has been reported to contribute to elevated BMI in PCOS, but it does not appear to play a major role in PCOS [18]. It has also been reported that there is no association between rs17782313 and PCOS [18]. However, when the two SNPs are considered together, a polygenetic effect is evident and the association is seemingly more significant.

The FTO rs9939609 SNP is related to body weight through its influence on energy intake and satiety [34]. However, the underlying association of FTO polymorphisms with PCOS risk remains unclear. One recent meta-analysis suggested that the effect of the FTO polymorphism rs9939609 may not be associated with the risk of PCOS in the overall population [35], and we also concluded that there is a direct association between the FTO variant and PCOS risk that is independent of BMI (adiposity) in East Asians [25, 22]. In Asian populations, the MAF of rs9939609 is not as high as in Caucasian populations (43–49 %); in our study, the MAF was 12.6 % [22]. The different genetic background of different ethnic populations may explain the discrepancy in the MAF. Although a direct association between the FTO variant and PCOS risk has been found [20, 22] and successfully replicated in this study, the effect of the FTO gene on PCOS is possibly related to its genetic interaction with other susceptibility genes, considering there were limited PCOS patients carrying the risk allele. The combination of susceptibility genes may contribute to the polygenic background of PCOS. In the present study, we observed a significant association between FTO and MC4R with PCOS in a Chinese population (p = 0.0014).

PCOS is considered to be complex, multifactorial or polygenic, meaning that the disease is likely associated with the effects of multiple genes in combination with lifestyles and environmental factors. Traditional approaches for studying the genetic basis of PCOS have limitations because they only target a single gene or cluster of tightly linked genes. Genes located on different chromosomes could together contribute to the genetic background of PCOS. As in the scenario in the current study, the association of FTO with PCOS was successfully replicated, but the association of the MC4R polymorphism was modest. However, based on their similar functions in control of food intake and energy consumption, FTO may contribute to the susceptibility of PCOS in combination with MC4R, and patients who are positive for both the FTO and the MC4R risk alleles are more likely to suffer from PCOS than those patients who are positive for either the FTO or the MC4R risk alleles.

Conclusions

A significant association was observed between PCOS and FTO rs9939609, but the association was attenuated after adjustment for BMI. However, MC4R rs17782313 was not related to an increased risk for PCOS, and the interaction of FTO and MC4R polymorphisms exhibited a more significant association with PCOS (P = 0.031, adjusted for age and BMI), indicating a combined pathogenic effect of FTO and MC4R in the development of PCOS.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

FTO: 

Fat mass and obesity-associated gene

HA: 

Hyperandrogenism

HWE: 

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

LD: 

Linkage disequilibrium

MAF: 

Minor allele frequency

MC4R: 

Melanocortin-4 receptor gene

PCOS: 

Polycystic ovary syndrome

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Natural Science Funds of Zhejiang (LY15E020001) and the Huzhou Science and Technology R & D Fund (2014GZ11, 2013GY14). We thank the staff from the endocrinology core of People’s First Hospital of Huzhou for their assistance in hormone measurement. This manuscript has been edited by American Journal Experts.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou Teachers College, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou
(2)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou Teachers College, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou
(3)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

References

  1. Azziz R, Woods KS, Reyna R, Key TJ, Knochenhauer ES, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2745–9. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-032046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Balen AH, Conway GS, Kaltsas G, Techatrasak K, Manning PJ, West C, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: the spectrum of the disorder in 1741 patients. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(8):2107–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carmina E, Azziz R. Diagnosis, phenotype, and prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2006;86 Suppl 1:S7–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lim SS, Davies MJ, Norman RJ, Moran LJ. Overweight, obesity and central obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(6):618–37. doi:10.1093/humupd/dms030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Shi Y, Guo M, Yan J, Sun W, Zhang X, Geng L, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics in large-scale Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007;28(6):807–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Azziz R, Sanchez LA, Knochenhauer ES, Moran C, Lazenby J, Stephens KC, et al. Androgen excess in women: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2):453–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Barber TM, McCarthy MI, Wass JA, Franks S. Obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;65(2):137–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Amato P, Simpson JL. The genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18(5):707–18. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.05.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Vink JM, Sadrzadeh S, Lambalk CB, Boomsma DI. Heritability of polycystic ovary syndrome in a Dutch twin-family study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(6):2100–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Walley AJ, Blakemore AI, Froguel P. Genetics of obesity and the prediction of risk for health. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15 Spec No 2:R124–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Peng S, Zhu Y, Xu F, Ren X, Li X, Lai M. FTO gene polymorphisms and obesity risk: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2011;9:71. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-71.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Scuteri A, Sanna S, Chen WM, Uda M, Albai G, Strait J, et al. Genome-wide association scan shows genetic variants in the FTO gene are associated with obesity-related traits. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(7):e115. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030115.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Stratigopoulos G, Padilla SL, LeDuc CA, Watson E, Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI, et al. Regulation of Fto/Ftm gene expression in mice and humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;294(4):R1185–96. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00839.2007.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Olszewski PK, Radomska KJ, Ghimire K, Klockars A, Ingman C, Olszewska AM, et al. Fto immunoreactivity is widespread in the rodent brain and abundant in feeding-related sites, but the number of Fto-positive cells is not affected by changes in energy balance. Physiol Behav. 2011;103(2):248–53. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Loos RJ, Lindgren CM, Li S, Wheeler E, Zhao JH, Prokopenko I, et al. Common variants near MC4R are associated with fat mass, weight and risk of obesity. Nat Genet. 2008;40(6):768–75. doi:10.1038/ng.140.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang W, Sun Y, Sun J. Combined effects of FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 on obesity and BMI in Chinese Han populations. Endocrine. 2011;39(1):69–74. doi:10.1007/s12020-010-9413-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Balthasar N, Dalgaard LT, Lee CE, Yu J, Funahashi H, Williams T, et al. Divergence of melanocortin pathways in the control of food intake and energy expenditure. Cell. 2005;123(3):493–505. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.035.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ewens KG, Jones MR, Ankener W, Stewart DR, Urbanek M, Dunaif A, et al. FTO and MC4R gene variants are associated with obesity in polycystic ovary syndrome. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16390. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016390.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tan S, Scherag A, Janssen OE, Hahn S, Lahner H, Dietz T, et al. Large effects on body mass index and insulin resistance of fat mass and obesity associated gene (FTO) variants in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). BMC Med Genet. 2010;11:12. doi:10.1186/1471-2350-11-12.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Barber TM, Bennett AJ, Groves CJ, Sovio U, Ruokonen A, Martikainen H, et al. Association of variants in the fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) gene with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetologia. 2008;51(7):1153–8. doi:10.1007/s00125-008-1028-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kowalska I, Malecki MT, Straczkowski M, Skupien J, Karczewska-Kupczewska M, Nikolajuk A, et al. The FTO gene modifies weight, fat mass and insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, where its role may be larger than in other phenotypes. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35(4):328–31. doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2009.03.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li T, Wu K, You L, Xing X, Wang P, Cui L, et al. Common variant rs9939609 in gene FTO confers risk to polycystic ovary syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e66250. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066250.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Songdo K, Lee H, Oh JY, Hong YS, Sung YA. FTO gene variants are associated with PCOS susceptibility and hyperandrogenemia in young Korean women. Diabetes Metab J. 2014;38(4):302–10. doi:10.4093/dmj.2014.38.4.302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wojciechowski P, Lipowska A, Rys P, Ewens KG, Franks S, Tan S, et al. Impact of FTO genotypes on BMI and weight in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55(10):2636–45. doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2638-6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Yan Q, Hong J, Gu W, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Su Y, et al. Association of the common rs9939609 variant of FTO gene with polycystic ovary syndrome in Chinese women. Endocrine. 2009;36(3):377–82. doi:10.1007/s12020-009-9257-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi Y, Zhao H, Shi Y, Cao Y, Yang D, Li Z, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight new risk loci for polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012;44(9):1020–5. doi:10.1038/ng.2384.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lurie G, Gaudet MM, Spurdle AB, Carney ME, Wilkens LR, Yang HP, et al. The obesity-associated polymorphisms FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 and endometrial cancer risk in non-Hispanic white women. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16756. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016756.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. da Cunha PA, de Carlos Back LK, Sereia AF, Kubelka C, Ribeiro MC, Fernandes BL, et al. Interaction between obesity-related genes, FTO and MC4R, associated to an increase of breast cancer risk. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40(12):6657–64. doi:10.1007/s11033-013-2780-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Bei-Fan Z. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults: study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11 Suppl 8:S685–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC. Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(1):149–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodarzi MO, Erickson S, Port SC, Jennrich RI, Korenman SG. Relative impact of insulin resistance and obesity on cardiovascular risk factors in polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 2003;52(6):713–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yildiz BO, Knochenhauer ES, Azziz R. Impact of obesity on the risk for polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(1):162–8. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1834.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Fredriksson R, Hagglund M, Olszewski PK, Stephansson O, Jacobsson JA, Olszewska AM, et al. The obesity gene, FTO, is of ancient origin, up-regulated during food deprivation and expressed in neurons of feeding-related nuclei of the brain. Endocrinology. 2008;149(5):2062–71. doi:10.1210/en.2007-1457.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Cai X, Liu C, Mou S. Association between fat mass- and obesity-associated (FTO) gene polymorphism and polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86972. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086972.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yuan et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement