The prostate is a sexual gland that produces important substances for the potency of sperm to fertilize eggs within the female reproductive tract, and is under complex endocrine control. Taking advantage of the peculiar behavioral pattern of copulating male rats, we developed experimental paradigms to determine the influence of sexual behavior on the level of serum testosterone, prostate androgen receptors, and mRNA for androgen receptors in male rats displaying up to four consecutive ejaculations.
Methods
The effect of four consecutive ejaculations was investigated by determining levels of (i) testosterone in serum by solid phase RIA, (ii) androgen receptors at the ventral prostate with Western Blots, and (iii) androgen receptors-mRNA with RT-PCR. Data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc application of Dunnett's test if required.
Results
The constant execution of sexual behavior did not produce any change in the weight of the ventral prostate. Serum testosterone increased after the second ejaculation, and remained elevated even after four ejaculations. The androgen receptor at the ventral prostate was higher after the first to third ejaculations, but returned suddenly to baseline levels after the fourth ejaculation. The level of mRNA increased after the first ejaculation, continued to increase after the second, and reached the highest peak after the third ejaculation; however, it returned suddenly to baseline levels after the fourth ejaculation.
Conclusion
Four consecutive ejaculations by sexually experienced male rats had important effects on the physiological responses of the ventral prostate. Fast responses were induced as a result of sexual behavior that involved an increase and decrease in androgen receptors after one and four ejaculations, respectively. However, a progressive response was observed in the elevation of mRNA for androgen receptors, which also showed a fast decrease after four ejaculations. All of these changes with the prostate gland occurred in the presence of a sustained elevation of testosterone in the serum that started after two ejaculations. A consideration of these fast-induced changes suggests that the nerve supply plays a key role in prostate physiology during the sexual behavior of male rats.
Background
The prostate is a sexual gland that produces important substances for the potency of sperm to fertilize eggs within the female reproductive tract. In order to accomplish this task, the prostate gland is finely regulated by neural and hormonal mechanisms, and possesses a complex histological organization. It is located at the proximal region of the urethra, the prostatic urethra, as a well-defined globular gland showing two clearly distinctive regions, the dorsolateral prostate and the bilobulated ventral prostate. Histological examination of the gland reveals that the two regions are organized into several alveoli surrounded by a stroma area. Each alveolus is arranged with a secretory epithelium involved in the synthesis of prostatic secretions.
The function of the prostate is under complex endocrine control. We showed previously that mating-induced release of prolactin (PRL) was important for the proper function of the epithelial cells, with a precise mechanism controlling its release since constant elevated levels of PRL caused detrimental effects on both the gland and male sexual behavior [1]. On the other hand, steroids have long been considered an essential part of prostate endocrinology, with androgens regarded as the etiology of prostate cancer following the early work of Charles B. Huggins. Androgen deprivation is therefore one of the most common therapies used today [2]. However, it is known that androgens play a key role in the adult male for the maintenance of several vital functions of the body, including those necessary for sexual behavior and reproduction [3–7]. Androgens have a strong impact on the prostate in adult subjects in terms of the maintenance of its morphology and secretory activity [8–10], with the ventral prostate being the main area that responds to androgen stimulation [11–13]. Additionally, androgens have a dual role in stimulating proliferation and inhibiting death of epithelial cells [14], which suggests the existence of a mechanism to avoid the pathological growth of the gland. Prostate responses to androgens are mediated by the wide distribution of androgen receptors (AR) in epithelial cells, smooth muscle, and stroma cells [15, 16]. It has been shown that the complex androgen-AR is translocated to the nucleus to regulate gene transcription [17], and that androgens produce an increase in both the level and half-life of AR [18]. However, the modulation of androgen and AR levels in the prostate of healthy subjects with a constant sexual life remains unknown.
The sexual behavior of male rats follows a well-known stereotyped pattern. Males display several mounts and intromissions before ejaculation, and all of these events occur recurrently in such a way that a male can achieve several ejaculatory events in a single sexual encounter. Taking advantage of this behavioral pattern, we developed experimental paradigms to determine the influence of sexual behavior on the level of serum testosterone, prostate androgen receptors, and mRNA for androgen receptors in male rats displaying up to four consecutive ejaculations.
Methods
Subjects and housing
Sexually experienced Wistar male rats (250–300 g/bw) were used in this investigation. Males were kept in a room with an inverted light-dark cycle (12-12 hr, lights off at 0800 hrs). Every rat was manipulated daily to promote habituation to experimental contact and the environment in order to minimize stress. Ovariectomized females were used and their sexual receptivity was induced with steroids dissolved in sesame oil. Accordingly, subcutaneous injections of estradiol benzoate (10 μg; Sigma-Aldrich Quimica, Mexico) and then progesterone (2 mg; Sigma-Aldrich Quimica, Mexico) were administered 48 and 4 hrs before tests, respectively. Rats were housed in plastic cages (50 × 30 × 20 cm) containing wood chip bedding, and were placed in rooms were under a controlled temperature (22 ± 2°C), with food (Harlan Mexico rodent chow) and water available ad libitum. Every surgical intervention and manipulation of rats was guided by the Society for Neuroscience Policy on the Use of Animals in Neuroscience Research.
Experimental design and determination of testosterone serum level
The experimental paradigm of this study was used to determine the effect of consecutive ejaculations (up to 4) on the level of serum testosterone and the expression of androgen receptors at the ventral prostate. Males were prepared for blood collection two days before the beginning of tests, and females were treated appropriately to induce a state of sexual receptivity. Blood collection was obtained from the jugular vein as described previously [1]. Experiments were carried out under red light between 12:00 and 16:00 hrs as follows: A male rat was taken from its cage, placed in a Plexiglas arena (60 cm diameter × 60 cm high), and five minutes later a receptive female was introduced. Parameters detailing the sexual behavior of the male were recorded immediately [19]; only the Hit Rate parameter is shown in the results. It represents a proportion obtained after the computation of the number of intromissions divided by the sum of the number of intromissions and the number of mounts [20], and is a good indicator of the appropriate execution of a male's sexual behavior.
The number of consecutive ejaculations marked the assigned group of the animal. Males from group E1 (n = 8) were allowed to ejaculate once, and then a post-ejaculatory blood sample was obtained. Group E2 males (n = 8) were allowed to ejaculate twice, group E3 males (n = 8) were allowed three ejaculations, and group E4 males (n = 8) were allowed four ejaculations, with post-ejaculatory blood samples being obtained after the final ejaculatory event of each male. Each blood sample was allowed to coagulate for 20 min, centrifuged for 10 min (at 3,500 rpm), and the serum was collected and centrifuged again. The resulting serum was divided in 400-μl aliquots that were stored at -70°C until assayed for testosterone by solid phase RIA with I125 [21] (sensitivity = 0.04 ng/ml; intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variations were 8.4 and 15.2, respectively). Additionally, the ventral prostate of each male was removed, weighed and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen until analyzed.
Determination of AR at the ventral prostate
Tissue from the ventral prostate (150 mg) was homogenized with 400 μl of Buffer "A" (HEPES 1 M pH 7.9, KCl 1 M, EDTA 0.5 M pH 8, PMSF 100 mM pH 8, and Protease Inhibitor Cocktail), and incubated for 20 min at 4°C. 25 μl of 10% NP-40 was then added during constant movement. The mixture was centrifuged (1 min at 10,000 rpm, 4°C) and the liquid phase (cytoplasmic) separated. The precipitated nuclear extract was re-suspended with 100 μl of Buffer "C" (HEPES 1 M pH 7.9, NaCl 4 M, EDTA 0.5 M pH 8, EGTA 10 mM pH 8, DTT 100 mM, PMSF 100 mM pH 8, and Protease Inhibitor Cocktail), and vortexed for 30 min at 4°C. 30-μl aliquots were separated and stored at -70°C until used. Chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Quimica, Mexico.
The level of total protein was measured using the Bradford method [22]. Briefly, a standard curve was obtained with solutions containing 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 μg/μl BSA, to which was added 180 μl of the Bradford solution (BioRad, Mexico). After a resting period of 5 min, the absorbance was read at a wavelength of 595 nm with a microplate spectrophotometer (BioRad 550). The samples were prepared with 20 μl of the nuclear extract diluted 1:20 with the Bradford solution. Linear regression analysis was performed with Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA), and produced a correlation index ≥ 0.95.
The level of AR was measured using the Western Blot procedure [21]. Samples of 100 μl were prepared with 2% 2-β mercaptoethanol heated in a bain-marie for 5 min at 60°C. AR was separated using 10% polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of SDS (SDS-PAGE; MiniProtean III, BioRad) at 100 V. The protein blot on the nitrocellulose membrane was performed for 2 hrs at 4°C with a current of 150 mA, and then it was blocked with TBS-Tween 0.1% and milk 5% for 1 hr at room temperature. The membrane was then washed for 10 min/3 times with the Tween-milk solution (now milk at 2.5%). The first antibody was added and left overnight at 4°C and at a dilution of 1:250. The membrane was washed for 10 min/5 times with the Tween-2.5% milk solution at room temperature. The second antibody-alkaline phosphatase was added for 1 hr at a dilution of 1:1000 at room temperature. The membrane was then washed for 10 min/5 times with the Tween-2.5% milk solution at 4°C. Finally, the membrane was treated with a Bio-Rad kit. The resulting bands were analyzed in a Kodak image station 440-CF using Kodak 1D 3.6 software. An antibody against β-actin was used as a control. Antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Santa Cruz, CA.
Determination of mRNA for AR at the ventral prostate
This experiment was performed using the semi-quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction procedure (RT-PCR) [23]. Tissue from the ventral prostate (100 mg) was homogenized in a Politron in 1 ml of Trizol, incubated for 5 min at room temperature, subjected to the addition of 200 μl of chloroform under continuous shaking, and incubated again for 3 min. The mixture was centrifuged (15 min at 8000 rpm, 8°C) and the liquid phase separated. Total RNA (RNAt) was precipitated with isopropilic alcohol (1:1 proportion), homogenized, incubated (10 min at room temperature), and centrifuged (10 min at 12000 rpm, 8°C). The resulting pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, and centrifuged (5 min at 7500 rpm, 8°C). The pellet was then dissolved with 50 μl of sterile water. 1 μl of this solution was added to 999 μl of sterile water (1:1000 dilution) to quantify RNAt. The absorbance was read at wavelengths of 260 and 280 nm with a spectrophotometer (Genova MK3).
Total cDNA (cDNAt) was obtained by thermocycling (3 min at 70°C) a mixture of 3 μl of RNAt, 1 μl of Oligo (dt), 1 μl of DNTP's, and 6 μl of sterile water. 9 μl of a cocktail containing 5 μl of Buffer 5x (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, and 40 mM KCl), 2 μl of DTT, 1 μl of RNAse inhibitor, and 1 μl of MMLV was then added. The mixture was incubated for 60 min at 37°C and then for 3 min at 94°C.
Amplification of cDNAt was accomplished with 2 μl of sense 5'-3' oligonucleotide (gtgtcgtctccggaaatgtt; corresponding to nucleotide 2781), 2 μl of antisense 3'-5' oligonucleotide (ggaatcaggctggttgttgt; corresponding to nucleotide 3030), 10 μl of cDNA, and 36 μl of a cocktail containing 1 μl of dNTP'S, 5 μl of Buffer 10X without MgCl2, and 1.5 μl of Mg++ as MgCl2 (50 mM), 0.5 μl of Taq polymerase, and 28 μl of sterile water. The amplification was performed using the following steps: 1 cycle of denaturation (5 min at 94°C), 30 annealing cycles (1 min at 94°C), then 1 cycle at 60°C (1 min) and 1 at 72°C (2 min), and 1 elongation cycle (10 min at 72°C, then at 4°C). The resulting fragment consisted of 250 base pairs. The internal control consisted of the amplification of 228 base pairs, between nucleotides 471 and 698 of the gene for rat β-actin. The sequence used was sense 5'-3' (agcctagtacgtagcctacc; nucleotide 471) and antisense 3'-5' (ctctcagctgtggtggtgaa; nucleotide 698). Products were separated through a 1% agarose gel with 3 μl of Etide Bromure (10 mg/ml solution) for 30 min at room temperature and at 100 V. The resulting bands were analyzed in a Kodak image station 440-CF using Kodak 1D 3.6 software. Chemicals were obtained from Invitrogen, Mexico.
Statistics
Although we were dealing with consecutive ejaculations, the data was derived from independent groups and our experimental design therefore precluded the use of repeated-measures paradigms. Hence, data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc application of Dunnett's test when the F value showed a significant difference at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the GB-STAT software package (Dynamic Microsystems, Inc., Silver Springs, MD), and significant differences were inferred when p < 0.05.
Results
Sexual behavior and prostate weight
Analysis of copulatory parameters showed that every male displayed standard ejaculatory patterns, as reported elsewhere [19], with 5–8 minutes of postejaculation refractory time. There were no significant differences for parameters between groups (Fig. 1 shows hit rate values). Furthermore, the constant execution of sexual behavior did not produce any change in the weight of the ventral prostate (Fig. 2).
Figure 1
The hit rate parameter. The quantification of sexual behavior in male rats includes the recording of several parameters. Two of the most important are the frequency of mounts (FM) and frequency of intromissions (FI). The computation of FI/(FM+FI) results in a value representing the hit rate, which reflects the potency of males with respect to the execution of sexual behavior. Figure shows this parameter as measured for experimental males, and indicates that the execution of sexual behavior was stable across consecutive ejaculations and in the range acceptable for sexually experienced males.
Figure 2
Weight of the ventral prostate in sexually active male rats. The graph shows that the weight of the ventral prostate was not affected by consecutive ejaculations, indicating that sexual experience and constant copulation did not impact its size.
Serum levels of testosterone
Testosterone was detected in every plasma sample analyzed; it increased after two ejaculations and exhibited elevated levels even after four ejaculations (~10 ng/ml). Statistical analysis showed that overall testosterone levels were different, and post hoc results revealed significant increases after two, three and four ejaculations in comparison to the precopulatory value (p < 0.01). The lowest concentration of the hormone (~3.5 ng/ml) before sexual behavior represented the baseline level of testosterone, and was not modified by a single ejaculation (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Testosterone in serum after consecutive ejaculations. The graph shows the basal level of testosterone in sexually experienced male rats before entering a sexual test (white bar). No effect was observed in this level after one ejaculation. However, the level increased to the highest value after the second and subsequent ejaculations. ** = p < 0.01.
Determination of AR at the ventral prostate
The protein for AR was also detected in every sample analyzed. The concentration of AR was significantly higher in samples taken after one, two and three ejaculations in comparison to the precopulatory value (~800% increase; p < 0.01). However, the concentration of AR after four ejaculations was equal to that of baseline levels (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Androgen receptors at the ventral prostate. The execution of consecutive ejaculations had a strong impact on the level of androgen receptors at the ventral prostate. The graph shows that the protein for androgen receptors was detected in males that were not copulating (white bar). However, the concentration increased to its highest value after ejaculations one to three, and then returned to baseline levels after four ejaculations. Western blots at the top show bands for β-actin (β-Ac) and the androgen receptor (AR); mw = molecular weight; 1–4 = number of ejaculations. ** = p < 0.01.
Determination of mRNA for AR at the ventral prostate
Levels of mRNA at the ventral prostate were determined for every sample, and increased significantly after one ejaculation (~100% increase; p < 0.05). Levels were highly significant after two and three ejaculations (p < 0.01), and kept increasing in these ejaculations (~200% and ~300% increase, respectively). However, the concentration of mRNA was equal to that of baseline levels after four ejaculations (Fig. 5).
Figure 5
mRNA for androgen receptors at the ventral prostate. The level of mRNA for androgen receptors at the ventral prostate was modulated by copulation. The graph shows that mRNA was detected in males before sexual behavior (white bar). The level of mRNA increased constantly during the first three ejaculations, reaching the highest value after the third ejaculation. However, the concentration returned to baseline levels after four ejaculations. RT-PCR gels at the top show bands of mRNA for β-actin (β-Ac mRNA) and the androgen receptor (mRNA AR); bp = base pair; 1–4 = number of ejaculations. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01.
Discussion
The continuous execution of sexual behavior by experienced male rats did not affect the weight of the ventral prostate, but had important effects on the physiological responses of the gland. The faster copulation-induced response involved a significant increase in androgen receptors, observed after one ejaculation even before the higher expression of mRNA for androgen receptors or the serum elevation of the hormone. Thus, although the regulation of androgen receptors by its ligand has been reported by several authors [18, 24], here we observed an increase of the receptor that precedes the increased serum levels of testosterone. This finding suggests another fast-activated mechanism for the rapid increase in the levels of androgen receptors at the ventral prostate, which could rely on the nerves supplying this region. Attached to the prostate is the major pelvic ganglion that receives two autonomic inputs from the spinal cord, the pelvic and hypogastric nerves, and gives off several branches that regulate the physiology of micturition and reproduction at the inferior genitourinary tract, representing preganglionic nerves activated during copulation [5, 25]. These nerves are considered key components for the physiology of sexual glands, and the prostate responds to their autonomic neurotransmitters in order to accomplish its functions [26]. In spinal-cord injured males, an altered expression of androgen receptors and its mRNA has been reported in the prostate due to the lack of appropriate neural control [27]. It has also been discovered that some neuroendocrine peptides from nerve terminals control the prostatic response to testosterone [28]. All of these findings support our proposal that the rapid elevation of androgen receptors after one ejaculation seems to be modulated by nerve activity. Nevertheless, this issue still deserves further research.
The elevation of androgen receptors remained high after three ejaculations, but after four ejaculations it returned to baseline levels. This process was reliably quantified in every male of the experimental group. Thus, the constant execution of sexual behavior produced a sharp biphasic response in the concentration of androgen receptors at the ventral prostate, such that a sudden elevation of receptors after one ejaculation was followed by a sudden withdrawal after four ejaculations. The elevation was discussed above as a result of nerve activity, and the withdrawal could also be attributed to nerve control due to the fast removal of receptors. In order to account for the drop in the concentration of androgen receptors, it is important to consider its degradation. As several authors have pointed out, the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is a complex cascade of enzymatic activity responsible for the proteolysis of proteins in which the androgen receptor is included [29–32]; hence, it is suggested that this is the active process for the copulation-induced degradation of androgen receptors at the ventral prostate. Although it has not been tested for the prostate gland, it is known that denervation of striated muscles activates the proteasome system in a manner that cannot be reversed by testosterone treatment [33], suggesting neural control of the proteasome pathway. Thus, a role of the autonomic nervous system in regulating this function in prostatic cells seems plausible.
The increase in androgen receptors at the ventral prostate is the first elevated response induced by copulation. At the same time, a gradual increase in the androgen receptor mRNA (AR-mRNA) commenced after one ejaculation, further increased after two, and reached a peak after three ejaculations. As in the case of the protein, the AR-mRNA level then experienced a sudden drop after four ejaculations. Thus, AR-mRNA also displayed a biphasic response, with a particular slope during its increase. Given that the nerve supply could also trigger the beginning of the AR-mRNA increase [27], the next question concerns the possible mechanism that sustains its continuous elevation. Some authors have shown that androgen stimulation down-regulates AR-mRNA [34], but here we saw that the maximum elevation of serum testosterone after two or three ejaculations did not arrest the continuous increase of AR-mRNA. Hence, we suggest that sexual behavior activates another prostatic process associated with the elevation of AR-mRNA in the presence of androgens. Data from control subjects showed a level of AR-mRNA indicating a basal gene transcription, and several reports have showed that post-transcriptional stabilization of AR-mRNA is a key process for controlling its metabolism [24, 34, 35]. Thus, it seems that a balance exists between gene transcription and stabilization that allows a basal/control level of AR-mRNA. Our proposal is that the execution of behavior modifies this balance by increasing the stabilization process, which reduces degradation and thereby induces a progressive accumulation of AR-mRNA due to the continuous basal gene transcription. Stability results after the binding of some specific proteins to the corresponding elements of mRNA, as represented by the AU-rich element binding protein or the Hu family of proteins [36–38]. During the fourth ejaculatory series, a rapid degradation process then occurs perhaps by the rapid removal of the binding proteins, which results in a fast destabilization of AR-mRNA. All of these processes support the hypothesis that the main control of AR-mRNA expression is post-transcriptional, and in this study we saw that it was modulated by behavior.
Serum levels of testosterone during mating were detected after two ejaculations and remained high for the rest of the experimental ejaculatory series. Though the elevation of testosterone in response to sexual stimuli in male rats was reported several years ago [39], in this study we showed an elevation during four consecutive ejaculations. This finding supports a number of reports showing the importance of testosterone in maintaining male reproductive physiology [20]. Here it is suggested that the basal circadian levels of serum testosterone [40] are optimal for triggering the first ejaculation, which in turn activates the system to release a higher concentration of the hormone to maintain the requirements of further ejaculatory events. Thus, a steady elevated level of serum testosterone after two ejaculations seems necessary to maintain the peculiar pattern of sexual behavior of male rats and the function of the prostate gland, among other processes. An important observation is the peak elevation recorded after the second ejaculation, because we reported previously a peak level of serum prolactin after the second ejaculation in male rats [1]. It therefore appears that in the complex pattern of male rat copulation, a second consecutive ejaculation triggers appropriate endocrine responses to ensure the reproductive potency of the couple.
Conclusion
Four consecutive ejaculations by sexually experienced male rats had important effects on the physiological responses of the ventral prostate. Fast responses were induced as a result of sexual behavior that involved an increase and decrease in androgen receptors after one and four ejaculations, respectively. However, a progressive response was observed in the elevation of mRNA for androgen receptors, which also showed a fast decrease after four ejaculations. All of these changes with the prostate gland occurred in the presence of a sustained elevation of testosterone in serum that started after two ejaculations. A consideration of the fast-induced changes suggests that the nerve supply plays a key role in prostate physiology during the sexual behavior of male rats.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
Supported by the "PIFI 3.3 Cuerpo Academico Neurobiologia de la Conducta y Divulgacion Cientifica", as well as CONACYT scholarships No. 207575 (RD) and 193578 (FR).
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Instituto de Neuroetologia, Universidad Veracruzana
(2)
Facultad de Quimica Farmaceutica Biologica, Universidad Veracruzana
References
Hernandez ME, Soto-Cid A, Rojas F, Pascual LI, Aranda-Abreu GE, Toledo R, Garcia LI, Quintanar-Stephano A, Manzo J: Prostate response to prolactin in sexually active male rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006, 4: 28-10.1186/1477-7827-4-28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fielder TJ, Peacock NR, McGivern RF, Swerdloff RS, Bhasin S: Testosterone dose-dependency of sexual and nonsexual behaviors in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-treated male rat. J Androl. 1989, 10: 167-173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Manzo J, Cruz MR, Hernandez ME, Pacheco P, Sachs BD: Regulation of noncontact erection in rats by gonadal steroids. Horm Behav. 1999, 35: 264-270. 10.1006/hbeh.1999.1519.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Manzo J, Garcia LI, Hernandez ME, Carrillo P, Pacheco P: Neuroendocrine control of urine-marking behavior in male rats. Physiol Behav. 2002, 75: 25-32. 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00637-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Manzo J, Garcia LI, Camacho MA, Hernandez ME, Pacheco P: Influence of testosterone on the electrical properties of scrotal nerves at the cutaneous and spinal levels in the male rat. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2003, 8: 75-81. 10.1046/j.1529-8027.2003.03010.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mooradian AD, Morley JE, Korenman SG: Biological actions of androgens. Endocr Rev. 1987, 8: 1-28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Banerjee S, Banerjee PP, Brown TR: Castration-induced apoptotic cell death in the Brown Norway rat prostate decreases as a function of age. Endocrinology. 2000, 141: 821-832. 10.1210/en.141.2.821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Okuda Y, Fujisawa M, Matsumoto O, Kamidono S: Testosterone dependent regulation of the enzymes involved in DNA synthesis in the rat ventral prostate. J Urol. 1991, 145: 188-191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sensibar JA, Alger B, Tseng A, Berg L, Lee C: Proteins of the rat prostate. III. Effect of testosterone on protein synthesis by the ventral prostate of castrated rats. J Urol. 1990, 143: 161-166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Banerjee PP, Banerjee S, Tilly KI, Tilly JL, Brown TR, Zirkin BR: Lobe-specific apoptotic cell death in rat prostate after androgen ablation by castration. Endocrinology. 1995, 136: 4368-4376. 10.1210/en.136.10.4368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hayashi N, Sugimura Y, Kawamura J, Donjacour AA, Cunha GR: Morphological and functional heterogeneity in the rat prostatic gland. Biol Reprod. 1991, 45: 308-321. 10.1095/biolreprod45.2.308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kiplesund KM, Halgunset J, Fjosne HE, Sunde A: Light microscopic morphometric analysis of castration effects in the different lobes of the rat prostate. Prostate. 1988, 13: 221-232. 10.1002/pros.2990130304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gao J, Isaacs JT: Mixed lineage kinase (MLK) family members are not involved in androgen regulation of prostatic proliferation or apoptosis. Prostate. 2001, 48: 67-70. 10.1002/pros.1082.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Prins GS: Prolactin influence on cytosol and nuclear androgen receptors in the ventral, dorsal, and lateral lobes of the rat prostate. Endocrinology. 1987, 120: 1457-1464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Prins GS, Birch L: Immunocytochemical analysis of androgen receptor along the ducts of the separate rat prostate lobes after androgen withdrawal and replacement. Endocrinology. 1993, 132: 169-178. 10.1210/en.132.1.169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee B: The role of the androgen receptor in the development of prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003, 253: 89-101. 10.1023/A:1026057402945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Dai JL, Maiorino CA, Gkonos PJ, Burnstein KL: Androgenic up-regulation of androgen receptor cDNA expression in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Steroids. 1996, 61: 531-539. 10.1016/S0039-128X(96)00086-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Manzo J, Vazquez MI, Cruz MR, Hernandez ME, Carrillo P, Pacheco P: Fertility ratio in male rats: effects after denervation of two pelvic floor muscles. Physiol Behav. 2000, 68: 611-618. 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00219-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Meisel RL, Sachs BD: The physiology of male sexual behavior. The physiology of reproduction. Edited by: E. K and Neill JD. 1994, New York, Raven Press, 3-106.Google Scholar
Walker JW: Methods in molecular biology. 1984, Clifton, NJ, Humana PressGoogle Scholar
Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sambrook J, Rusell DW: Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. 2001, New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
Yeap BB, Krueger RG, Leedman PJ: Differential posttranscriptional regulation of androgen receptor gene expression by androgen in prostate and breast cancer cells. Endocrinology. 1999, 140: 3282-3291. 10.1210/en.140.7.3282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cruz MR, Liu YC, Manzo J, Pacheco P, Sachs BD: Peripheral nerves mediating penile erection in the rat. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1999, 76: 15-27. 10.1016/S0165-1838(98)00191-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Aumuller G, Braun BE, Seitz J, Muller T, Heyns W, Krieg M: Effects of sexual rest or sexual activity on the structure and function of the ventral prostate of the rat. Anat Rec. 1985, 212: 345-352. 10.1002/ar.1092120404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Huang HF, Li MT, Linsenmeyer TA, Ottenweller JE, Pogach LM, Irwin RJ: The effects of spinal cord injury on the status of messenger ribonucleic acid for TRPM 2 and androgen receptor in the prostate of the rat. J Androl. 1997, 18: 250-256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gkonos PJ, Krongrad A, Roos BA: Neuroendocrine peptides in the prostate. Urol Res. 1995, 23: 81-87. 10.1007/BF00307937.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gelmann EP: Molecular biology of the androgen receptor. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 3001-3015. 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lin HK, Altuwaijri S, Lin WJ, Kan PY, Collins LL, Chang C: Proteasome activity is required for androgen receptor transcriptional activity via regulation of androgen receptor nuclear translocation and interaction with coregulators in prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 36570-36576. 10.1074/jbc.M204751200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lin HK, Wang L, Hu YC, Altuwaijri S, Chang C: Phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitylation and degradation of androgen receptor by Akt require Mdm2 E3 ligase. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 4037-4048. 10.1093/emboj/cdf406.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Woodham C, Birch L, Prins GS: Neonatal estrogen down-regulates prostatic androgen receptor through a proteosome-mediated protein degradation pathway. Endocrinology. 2003, 144: 4841-4850. 10.1210/en.2003-0035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Beehler BC, Sleph PG, Benmassaoud L, Grover GJ: Reduction of skeletal muscle atrophy by a proteasome inhibitor in a rat model of denervation. Exp Biol Med (Maywood ). 2006, 231: 335-341.Google Scholar
Prins GS, Woodham C: Autologous regulation of androgen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in the separate lobes of the rat prostate gland. Biol Reprod. 1995, 53: 609-619. 10.1095/biolreprod53.3.609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lu JY, Schneider RJ: Tissue distribution of AU-rich mRNA-binding proteins involved in regulation of mRNA decay. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 12974-12979. 10.1074/jbc.M310433200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Peng SS, Chen CY, Xu N, Shyu AB: RNA stabilization by the AU-rich element binding protein, HuR, an ELAV protein. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 3461-3470. 10.1093/emboj/17.12.3461.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Yeap BB, Voon DC, Vivian JP, McCulloch RK, Thomson AM, Giles KM, Czyzyk-Krzeska MF, Furneaux H, Wilce MC, Wilce JA, Leedman PJ: Novel binding of HuR and poly(C)-binding protein to a conserved UC-rich motif within the 3'-untranslated region of the androgen receptor messenger RNA. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 27183-27192. 10.1074/jbc.M202883200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hart BL: Role of testosterone secretion and penile reflexes in sexual behavior and sperm competition in male rats: a theoretical contribution. Physiol Behav. 1983, 31: 823-827. 10.1016/0031-9384(83)90279-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mock EJ, Norton HW, Frankel AI: Daily rhythmicity of serum testosterone concentration in the male laboratory rat. Endocrinology. 1978, 103: 1111-1121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
