Skip to main content

A review of nitric oxide and oxidative stress in typical ovulatory women and in the pathogenesis of ovulatory dysfunction in PCOS

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous functional endocrine disorder associated with a low-grade, chronic inflammatory state. Patients with PCOS present an increased risk of metabolic comorbidities and often menstrual dysregulation and infertility due to anovulation and/or poor oocyte quality. Multiple mechanisms including oxidative stress and low-grade inflammation are believed to be responsible for oocyte deterioration; however, the influence of nitric oxide (NO) insufficiency in oocyte quality and ovulatory dysfunction in PCOS is still a matter for debate. Higher production of superoxide (O2•−) mediated DNA damage and impaired antioxidant defense have been implicated as contributory factors for the development of PCOS, with reported alteration in superoxide dismutase (SOD) function, an imbalanced zinc/copper ratio, and increased catalase activity. These events may result in decreased hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation with increased lipid peroxidation events. A decrease in NO, potentially due to increased activity of NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors such as asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), and imbalance in the distribution of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as decreased H2O2 and increased O2•−, may offset the physiological processes surrounding follicular development, oocyte maturation, and ovulation contributing to the reproductive dysfunction in patients with PCOS. Thus, this proposal aims to evaluate the specific roles of NO, oxidative stress, ROS, and enzymatic and nonenzymatic elements in the pathogenesis of PCOS ovarian dysfunction, including oligo- anovulation and oocyte quality, with the intent to inspire better application of therapeutic options. The authors believe more consideration into the specific roles of oxidative stress, ROS, and enzymatic and nonenzymatic elements may allow for a more thorough understanding of PCOS. Future efforts elaborating on the role of NO in the preoptic nucleus to determine its influence on GnRH firing and follicle-stimulating hormone/Luteinizing hormone (FSH/LH) production with ovulation would be of benefit in PCOS. Consequently, treatment with an ADMA inhibitor or NO donor may prove beneficial to PCOS patients experiencing reproductive dysfunction and infertility.

Background

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous functional endocrine disorder associated with a low-grade, chronic inflammatory state. It affects about 5–15% of women [1,2,3] worldwide and makes up about 70% of the ovulatory infertility cases [4, 5]. There is evidence to suggest that environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals contribute to altered fetal programming, hence, play a role in the pathogenesis of PCOS [6, 7]; however, the fundamental issue in PCOS relates to associated hyperandrogenism [8], which is supported by the discovery of naturally occurring PCOS phenotypes in non-human primates that confers a survival advantage of a hyperandrogenic and insulin resistant phenotype [8]. Such excess androgens in humans may originate from maternal, fetal, or placental sources [9, 10], and may influence circulating redox balance by regulating expression and activities of a series of cellular oxidant and antioxidative enzyme system in those with the syndrome [11, 12]. Another potential source of excess androgens arises from the high incidence of insulin resistance (IR) in PCOS, independent of obesity [13]. The increased proinflammatory state is in part due to elevation of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), which is a known mediator of IR [14]. Indeed, oxidative stress and IR alongside subsequent hyperinsulinemia has been speculated as a promoter of hyperandrogenism, and mitochondrial and ovulatory dysfunction in PCOS [15]. Mitochondrial mutations in PCOS [16] may lead to impaired oxidative phosphorylation, decreased adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production, and an increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may contribute to the metabolic and hormonal dysregulation in this condition by disrupting insulin signaling pathways and impairing glucose metabolism [17].

Oxidative stress is a general term used to describe the imbalance between ROS and antioxidants. It is commonly and generally applied to disease states in the body and has been shown to contribute to the biochemical parameters of PCOS. ROS are involved in redox signaling and are capable of producing molecular damage by reacting with DNA and causing mutations, carcinogenesis, apoptosis, necrosis and hereditary diseases [18]. Important and significant biomarkers of ROS-mediated DNA damage such as 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) and its nucleotide 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) are formed when ROS react with DNA [19]. If these damaged adducts are not removed by DNA repair enzymes, their levels will increase in the tissues and reflect as low in the serum, a phenomenon that has been demonstrated in women with PCOS compared to healthy controls [20]. Kelly and collaborators [21] reported that PCOS patients exhibit chronic low-grade inflammation, manifested as elevated levels of C reactive protein. Moreover, other markers of oxidative stress such as malonodialdehyde (MDA) and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) further elucidate the advanced lipid peroxidation and metabolic dysfunction and may play an important role in IR, obesity, and reproductive dysfunction in PCOS [22,23,24,25].

The issue is further complicated because PCOS is a complex heterogeneous disorder, categorized into four phenotypes (A-D) by the revised Rotterdam Criteria [26], which entails two or three cardinal features: hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction, and PCO-like morphology of at least one ovary. Ovulatory dysfunction is a common cause of amenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility [27] and in PCOS, are due to hyperandrogenemia and IR [28,29,30]; however, the mechanism by which they lead to oocyte and ovulatory dysfunction is still a matter for debate. Studies have shown that oxidative stress negatively affects ovarian follicles and disrupts normal follicular development and maturation [31,32,33]. Excessive ROS may damage oocytes and granulosa cells within the follicles, impairing their quality and compromising fertility [34, 35]. Impaired oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial dysfunction may contribute to IR by disrupting insulin signaling pathways and impairing glucose metabolism [36,37,38]. Hyperandrogenism promotes inflammation and IR, both of which can increase the production of ROS and lead to oxidative stress.

Despite the foregoing, ROS are not always harmful as they act as intracellular signaling molecules essential for immune responses and cognitive functions. Cellular sources of ROS include macrophages, neutrophils, monocytes, endothelial cells, and cardiomyocytes and from enzymes and cellular metabolism such has mitochondrial metabolism, xanthine oxidase, and cytochrome P450 [39,40,41,42]. Nitric oxide synthases (NOS), which produce nitric oxide (NO), are also potential sources for ROS under certain conditions. NO plays a functional role systemically as a freely diffusible molecule that allows for hyperpolarization and vasodilation, and as a signaling molecule that is key in several reproductive and endocrine functions. NO is generated by one of three NOS isoforms (Table 1): endothelial NOS (eNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS), and neuronal NOS (nNOS) in which L-Arginine (L-Arg) and molecular oxygen are converted into NO and L-Citrulline. Each isoform of NOS is a homodimeric hemoprotein comprised of two identical subunits each containing a bound calmodulin, requiring the cofactors zinc and tetrahydrobiopterin (H4B) to maintain a tight dimer and proper function [43]. Enzymatic activity can be altered due to NOS uncoupling, thereby favoring the generation of ROS such as superoxide (O2•−). O2•− can then react with bioavailable NO to generate peroxynitrite (ONOO), which contributes significantly to cytotoxicity either through induction of free radical pathways or directly through interactions with lipids, DNA, and proteins [44]. Regardless of the pathway, increased oxidative stress modulates oxidative injury to cells resulting in necrosis or apoptosis. Interestingly, recent studies have shown the role of ONOO in insulin signaling and IR, elucidating that the high inflammatory state accompanying obesity-related IR results in higher iNOS expression and thus an increase in nitration and lipid peroxidation events [45].

Table 1 Overview of nitric oxide synthases, reactive oxygen species, and antioxidant enzymes

NO has been proposed to prevent atresia and apoptosis in developing follicles [46,47,48,49,50] and lowered level of NO is reported in women with PCOS [51]. However, there is evidence to suggest that estrogen stimulated gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion could be mediated via increased NO production in the median eminence [52]. In addition, research applying chemistry and biochemistry suggest that aside from biologically active proinflammatory mediators, metallic compounds also have a role in the pathophysiology of PCOS [93]. Notable among these metals is zinc, which is an essential cofactor and a signaling ion for NOS dimeric activity [43]. Further, given that anovulation is ranked as the most common cause of infertility with low documented IVF/ICSI success rates [3], it is incumbent on scientist to study this phenomenon in PCOS [1] (see Table 2 for current studies on NO and PCOS and oxidative stress and PCOS). The objective of this review is to connect the current research findings in PCOS and the contribution of NO/NOS in attempts to explain its associated ovulatory dysfunction. We hypothesize that altered enzymatic activity and distribution of ROS promotes a deficiency in H2O2 and NO that may facilitate the disruption of the ovulatory process in PCOS, including steroidogenesis, oocyte maturation, and cumulus cell expansion.

Table 2 PCOS studies with nitric oxide and oxidative stress

Methodology

An extensive literature review was conducted through the online databases PubMed, Science Direct, and Springer Link up to March 2023, using the keywords “polycystic ovary syndrome/PCOS”, “nitric oxide”, “M1/M2 macrophages”, “arginase”, “asymmetric dimethylarginine/ADMA”, “oocyte development”, “oocyte maturation”, “reactive oxygen species/ROS”, “anovulation”, and “antioxidants”. References included in this work are peer reviewed articles written in the English language, and references in the retrieved articles were individually hand searched for additional related references. Original articles were selected presenting an overview of PCOS, oligo-anovulation, anovulation, inflammation, and ROS/oxidative stress with infertility.

Ovulation in normal menstruating women

Females are born with a finite number of oocytes, about 200,000- 600,000. These oocytes are arrested at the diplotene stage of prophase I of the first meiotic division as a germinal vesicle (GV) in primordial follicles, which contain primary oocytes until puberty and before the start of each ovulatory cycle. Two nuclei in the brain are important as it relates to ovarian function: the thalamus and the hypothalamus. Ovulation requires a series of events, beginning with coordinated firing of GnRH neurons (Fig. 1) by the preoptic area within the hypothalamus as it relates to frequency and amplitude [53] for sex hormone regulation. NO production occurs in the preoptic nucleus in close proximity to cell bodies of GnRH-immunoreactive neurons. The rostral preoptic hypothalamic areas are rich in nNOS gene expression, as seen by in situ hybridization [54, 55]. This is supported by a recent study by McCosh et al., [56] that uses a sheep model to produce data to support the hypothesis that the population of somatostatin neurons in the ventral lateral region of the ventral medial nucleus of the thalamus are a source of NO as they contained nNOS. These neurons synapse onto GnRH neurons and neurons co-expressing kisspeptin, neurokinin B, dynorphin. The GnRH neurons release GnRH into the tuberoinfundibular tract and is transported through the hypophyseal portal system to the gonadotrophs in the anterior pituitary gland where they synapse on the GnRH receptors to cause the coordinated release of pituitary gonadotropins (follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH)). The firing of these neurons is increased during the LH surge compared with other phases of the menstrual cycle hence represent an important site of estradiol (E2) positive feedback. To confirm these assertions, the authors [56] also showed that intracerebroventricular infusion of the NOS inhibitor, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, completely blocked the estrogen-induced LH surge.

At each ovulatory menstrual cycle, a select group of primordial follicles are recruited. The rate of firing of the GnRH pulse generator – a highly calcium-dependent and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) stimulated phenomenon [57, 58] - determines which gonadotropin is synthesized by the preoptic nucleus whereby more rapid pulses of GnRH neurons preferentially increase synthesis and secretion of LH. FSH is preferentially stimulated by slower-frequency GnRH pulses [59, 60] that start in the luteal phase of the previous menstrual cycle leading to production of FSH [53] in the early follicular phase. This rise in FSH allows the recruited primordial follicles to begin growing, with one eventually becoming the dominant follicle. These processes are tightly regulated by intrafollicular events including paracrine factors in the theca, mural, and granulosa cells with a heavy reliance on oocyte competence suggesting a potential “checkpoint” in the process [61,62,63]. In ovulatory women, the follicle that has grown to acquire the highest amount of FSH receptors continues to respond to the falling FSH as the cycle progresses while the remaining unrecruited follicles undergo apoptosis. High concentration of NO is associated with apoptotic cell death, which is supported by an increase in cell apoptosis following induction of iNOS and use of exogenous NO donors [64] suggesting that NO may be involved in apoptosis of non-dominant follicles. In the mid follicular phase, the GnRH pulse generator firing changes to increased frequency and amplitude of LH production. By this time, the surface of theca and granulosa cells of the dominant follicle express more LH receptors rather than FSH receptors that are responsible for the notable shift in the ovarian follicle steroidogenic pathway mediated by membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptors localized on the surface of follicle cells [65]. This increase in GnRH firing leads to a rise in plasma LH that drives the transition from follicular growth to maturation.

The surge in LH has been shown to initiate several changes in the dominant follicle microenvironment that culminate in follicular rupture and ovulation. The LH surge also initiates the increase in the production of cAMP, steroidogenesis, and the release of inflammatory mediators that promote angiogenesis and hyperemia to degrade the follicle’s connective tissue in preparation for ovulation [60, 66, 67]. NO is also believed to be involved in follicular development as its level increases during follicle growth and decreases immediately after ovulation [47].

Macrophages are key in the inflammatory response and are the most abundant immune cells in the ovaries with important functions in ovarian homeostasis [68]. Similarly, intraovarian macrophages vary in their location and distribution during different stages of the cycle, and are present in peri-ovulatory human follicular fluid, suggesting that macrophages and macrophage derived products play an important regulatory role in intra-ovarian events including folliculogenesis, tissue restructuring at ovulation, and corpus luteum formation and regression [69]. Further, given that ROS originate from inflammatory cells such as macrophages and neutrophils, which are known to be recruited to the ovary following the LH surge, the induction of inflammation by the LH surge elucidates the participation of ROS. [46, 47]. Shkolnik and collaborators [66] provided strong evidence that ovulatory response is associated with inflammation, and involvement of ROS. The authors showed that administration of scavengers of oxidative species into the ovarian bursa of mice hormonally induced to ovulate, significantly reduced the rate of ovulation while LH-stimulated up-regulation of genes, crucial for ovulation, was substantially attenuated upon ROS ablation. These authors also showed that antioxidants prevented LH-induced cumulus expansion, necessary for ovulation, and caused impaired progesterone production in isolated follicles incubated with LH [66].

Finally, following ovulation, the follicular remnant forms the corpus luteum, that contains luteinized granulosa cells responsible for progesterone synthesis in preparation for a possible pregnancy [70]. If pregnancy does not occur, the drop in LH after ovulation alters the frequency of GnRH release, restarting the secretion of FSH and ensuing the next menstrual cycle.

Ovulatory dysfunction in PCOS

In patients with PCOS, GnRH pulse frequency and amplitude are persistently increased [71] favoring the production of high plasma LH relative to FSH, which remains in the low levels seen in the early follicular phase, a typical phenomenon seen in combination with anovulation, and the arrest of antral follicles. The mechanisms responsible for the neuroendocrine abnormalities in PCOS is still not well elucidated, however, studies have revealed decreased sensitivity of the GnRH pulse generator to inhibition by ovarian steroids (estradiol and progesterone) [61,62,63] may be at play. In addition, MiRNAs [72], mutations and SNPs of nuclear-encoded genes (such as FSHR, LHCGR, and others) have been linked to PCOS development and pathogenesis [73, 74].

Three out of the four phenotypes of PCOS according to the Rotterdam Criteria include ovulatory dysfunction characterized by chronic anovulation. This phenomenon in PCOS occurs with (type A and B phenotypes) or without (Type D phenotype) elevated androgens. Notably, there are no clear androgen levels that definitively classify biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS, and serum androgens can be affected by metabolic state [75]. In addition, it is accepted that the hyperandrogenemia in PCOS can be clinical only [76], all of which add to the complexity of the disorder. In PCOS patients, typically, there is increased estradiol secretion from the ovary, a continuous high frequency pulse generation of GnRH, decreased FSH, and a persistently high LH level that does not reach the threshold LH “surge” that typically would induce ovulation [70, 77]. Further, it is common to see estradiol (E2) levels within a normal range expected during the early to mid-follicular phase of a menstrual cycle [78,79,80].

The chronic anovulation plus hyperandrogenemia in PCOS have been linked to chronic low-grade inflammation. The increase in low grade chronic inflammation in PCOS is associated with increase macrophage infiltration. Macrophages express the enzymes myeloperoxidase (MPO) and arginase, and may both contribute to a decrease in NO bioavailability [69] in PCOS similar to what entails in ovariectomized pigs [81] and after oophorectomy [82]. Although there are conflicting reports regarding increased inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and alteration in the expression of inflammatory cytokines [e.g., upregulation of interleukin (IL) 6, IL8, IL1β, and TNFα] in granulosa cells in PCOS [83,84,85,86,87,88], there is evidence they may result in a premature influx of leukocytes, specifically through macrophage activation. To support these assertions, metformin and troglitazone used in PCOS (an agonist of the peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor gamma), with insulin sensitizing abilities in adipocytes have been shown to exert potent anti-inflammatory effects in macrophages [81, 82] that not only improve insulin sensitivity but also reduces inflammation, measured as C-reactive protein levels [89].

NO and ROS in oocyte development and ovulation in normal menstruating women

NO functions to inhibit aromatase, an enzyme that works to convert androgens to estrogens [90], in the ovary [91]. During the menstrual cycle the rise in estrogen, namely 17 beta-estradiol (E2), signals the change in pulse frequency of GnRH resulting in decreased FSH and increase LH secretion [92, 93]. The surge in LH then signals meiotic maturation and the beginning of ovulatory events. NO is reported to be crucial for induction of the LH surge in mammals, with studies focusing on rats and, more recently, sheep [56, 94,95,96]. In ovariectomized rats, Bonavera and his colleagues [95] determined that the magnitude and duration of the LH surge is lower than in wild type cycling rats potentially because there is a low-grade stimulatory feedback of E2 on LH secretion. Moreover, they determined treatment with L-Arg, essential for NOS function, enhances the LH surge in E2-primed ovariectomized rats [95] signifying the role of NO in the physiological ovulatory process (Fig. 1). First, the LH surge results in a decrease in follicular iNOS and NO, and subsequently cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) through phosphorylation of gap junction proteins, namely connexin-43, between the granulosa cells [39,40,41]. Cyclic guanosine monophosphate mediates physiological functions of NO, such that when cGMP is high it antagonizes the activity of phosphodiesterase 3 A (PDE3A), promoting oocyte arrest [42]. The decrease in cGMP following the surge in LH subsequently increases PDE3A activity, that hydrolyzes cAMP allowing for germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) and formation of the first meiotic spindle in metaphase I [42]. The oocyte can then resume meiosis and progress until its arrest in metaphase II following the release of the first polar body at the time of ovulation, ready to be fertilized [43]. Second, the LH surge increases the activity of the proteolytic enzymes that weaken the ovarian wall thus allowing for extrusion of the oocyte [36]. These processes are in keeping with studies that investigated the role of oocyte quality in ovulation, determining that poor oocyte quality or oocyte-cumulus miscommunication results in anovulatory events. In mice lacking connexin-37, an essential gap junction protein, for example, large preovulatory follicles develop but do not produce resultant ovulation [44]. Similarly, damage or deletion to gene products necessary for oocyte chromatin modifications can cause a reduced ovulation rate [45]. Others also concurred [97,98,99] and showed that inhibition of iNOS in rats results in a reduction of ovulation rates by 50%, an outcome that is reversed by treatment with an NO donor. Another study showed NO enhances vasodilatation, which is responsible for follicle selection and maturation in both spontaneous and stimulated in-vitro fertilization cycles [109, 110]. However, it is important to note that research regarding cyclical fluctuations of NO in regard to fertility is lacking. A study by Mandhane et al. [100]., investigated exhaled NO parameters during the menstrual cycle as a way to determine the cyclical effects previously observed in asthma and atopy of normally cycling women. They concluded exhaled NO decreased during phases of the menstrual cycle that correlated with increased estrogen, whereas when progesterone levels were high there was an increase in exhaled NO. Intuitively, the functions of NO can be speculated to increase vascular flow to the ovary and developing follicle while also allowing for proper buildup of the uterine lining during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. One study [101], found that in fertile women, NO metabolites were higher during the follicular phase compared to the secretory phase with levels reaching a maximum at midcycle. Similarly, a study by Ota et al. [102]., found the expression of eNOS in the endometrium gradually increased beginning at the early proliferative phase through the mid-secretory phase, in which levels were greatest.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Physiological requirements for the induction of ovulation

NO, ROS, and ADMA in oocyte development and anovulation in PCOS

NO in oocyte development and anovulation in PCOS

Patients with PCOS recruit more than the average number of antral follicles as ascertained by baseline early follicular phase transvaginal ultrasound [103]. At the level of the oocyte, NO plays a role in meiotic maturation [48, 49], and mediates an anti-apoptotic effect preventing premature atresia of developing follicle. Importantly, the deficiency of NO and H2O2 in the follicular microenvironment of PCO follicles may have substantial impacts on development of oocytes therein and ovulation. In support of this assertion is one study that showed intra-follicular milieu in NO treated patients improved follicular growth, oocyte quality and maturation [104]. Therefore, reduced NO seen in PCOS may be associated with arrest of follicular development. This is in keeping with another experiment, this time in rats that found specific iNOS inhibitor aminoguanidine inhibited ovulation by 50%, an effect that was completely reversed by NO donor sodium nitroprusside [99]. Similarly, the relative increase estradiol production in PCOS is akin to experiments that showed NO inhibition caused constant estrous in rats [105]. Without NO and H2O2, it is likely there will be altered estrogen signaling, arrested follicles, immature oocytes, inadequate cumulus-cell expansion, and decreased ovulatory events.

As mentioned previously, NO is essential for the production of cGMP and it does this through its role as a ligand of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Soluble guanylyl cyclase catalyzes the conversion of GTP to cGMP, thus NO is required to maintain cGMP levels and oocyte arrest [106,107,108,109]. Although NO is low in PCOS, Fan et al., [110] found elevated concentrations of cGMP in PCOS patients suggesting this ligand may play a role in follicular arrest in PCOS and hence its associated chronic anovulation; therefore, data regarding GMP in this syndrome remain controversial and it is possible that elevated concentration of cGMP in PCOS is through another but unknown mechanism. Afterall, increase cGMP without associated increase NO is seen with use of potassium channel openers, for example Nicorandil, known to open ATP-sensitive potassium (K-ATP) channels, can elevate cGMP levels in some tissues, without direct NO generation [111]. It seems, therefore, that any mechanism that would decrease the expression of cGMP and cAMP would activate meiotic resumption and hence increase the rates of metaphase II (MII) oocytes and eventually ovulation. One small RCT [112] evaluated the effect of isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN), a NO donor on the ovulation and pregnancy rates in 90 anovulatory women with PCOS randomly allocated into three 5-day clomiphene citrate (CC) treatment groups namely; 100 mg CC only, and with additional intravaginal 10 mg or 20 mg of ISMN respectively. The authors reported significant increase in the ovulation and pregnancy rates in the patients treated with CC + ISMN as compared with patients treated with CC alone (p < 0.001). These are yet another evidence that the chronic anovulation seen in anovulatory PCOS phenotypes may be due to decrease NO production.

The role of ADMA, a NOS inhibitor, in the pathogenesis of decreased NO production in PCOS

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), a known endogenous competitive NOS inhibitor plays a role in the pathogenesis of decreased NO production in PCOS [113] (Fig. 2). ADMA functions to competitively bind to the L-Arg site of NOS, disrupting the function of the enzyme resulting in ADMA induced O2•− production [43]. Akedmir and colleagues reported that serum ADMA levels have small fluctuations throughout the menstrual cycle, with levels increasing in the follicular phase and decreasing in the luteal phase [114], and ADMA has been noted to be elevated in the plasma of individuals with PCOS [115] as well as in some of its other sequela such as hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and atherosclerosis, all of which are associated with reduced NO synthesis [116,117,118,119]. Using Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)-induced PCOS Sprague Dawley rats and the ovarian granulosa cell line KGN, Li and colleagues [115] investigated the effect of the ADMA-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 (DDAH1) pathway on redox status and ovarian apoptosis. These rats were noted to have higher ADMA levels in serum and lower DDAH1 expression in their ovaries. ADMA treatment of the KGN cells induced ROS accumulation and led to apoptosis. Overexpression of DDAH1 enhanced cell viability, and inhibited oxidative stress, while the effect was reverse in DDAH1 knockdown cells. These authors [115] also quantified the ADMA levels and redox status in serum specimens of 19 women with PCOS and 17 healthy women (controls) and showed that women with PCOS had increased serum ADMA levels and decreased glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) compared with the controls. These experiments demonstrate the involvement of elevated ADMA levels and redox imbalance in PCOS, which would suggest that alterations in the activity of DDAH could interfere with NO concentrations by increasing or decreasing ADMA [120].

In the follicular fluid obtained from women participating in an IVF program, Bódis et al., [120] noted that elevated levels of L-Arg and methylarginines have adverse effect on the number of oocytes and embryos generated, thus negatively impacting reproductive function. These authors reported the mean ADMA levels in the FF was 0.470 µM in those with less than 6 developed embryos and 0.368 µM in those with greater than 6 developed embryos. Given that ADMA is known to be increased in PCOS, it is plausible that enhanced ADMA may inhibit NOS functionality in this disorder, leading to a decrease in NO production as well as associated harmful sequela such as hypertension, obesity, and IR [121,122,123,124].

The competition between NOS and arginase in PCOS

Arginase is the last step enzyme in the hepatic urea cycle, but recent research has identified its role in normal and several other pathophysiological processes [125]. In PCOS, there is enhancement of arginase levels and alteration in arginine metabolism. Macrophages traditionally generate arginase, which is a metalloenzyme found in mammals in two forms: arginase-I (Arg-I), primarily in the cytoplasm, and arginase-II (Arg-II), primarily in the mitochondrion [126, 127]. Androgen stimulation was found to upregulate interleukin-8 (IL-8) and that it directly increased the expression of Arg-I and Arg-II [128]. Both isoforms hydrolyze L-Arg to generate urea and L-orinthine. Arg-I is associated with expression in M2 macrophages in which it competes with iNOS, generated by M1 macrophages, thereby reducing iNOS activity and NO concentration, while Arg-II influences the macrophage inflammatory response by promoting mitochondrial ROS such as O2•− [119]. There have been conflicting reports surrounding the ability of arginase to compete with NOS for L-Arg due to kinetic studies elucidating low-affinity for binding in biological systems [129,130,131]; however, a recent kinetic simulation model by Momma and Ottaviani [129] that aimed to investigate the competition between the enzymes for L-Arg concluded that even under extreme conditions where the Vmax ratio is 100,000:1 (arginase:NOS), arginase does not outcompete NOS. Under conditions in which ADMA activity is increased as with PCOS, the competitive inhibition through the L-Arg binding site may decrease the competition between NOS and arginase allowing arginase to consume the free L-Arg. This pathway may explain the enhancement of arginase levels and alteration in arginine metabolism seen in PCOS leading to the commonly observed increased ornithine levels [132, 133]. Kyselova and collaborators [133] found that the ratio of ornithine to arginine was significantly increased in plasma from PCOS patients and was associated with a significant increase in plasma arginase levels and activity compared to control. Further, this theory is in agreements with the work done by Krishna et al., [51] who in a retrospective cohort study analyzed NO2/NO3 and H2O2 concentrations, transcript levels of endothelial NOS (eNOS)/iNOS, arginine modulators, and H2O2 regulators in PCOS women (N = 29) and non PCOS controls (N = 20). The authors conclude that PCOS women have lowered NO due to reduced levels of iNOS/eNOS expression, low H2O2, high ADMA synthesis and reduced arginine bioavailability. Moreover, the reduction in H2O2 may be due to increase in catalase levels, a consequence of the body’s effort to alleviate the oxidative burden in the system (Fig. 2). Therefore, arginine bioavailability may play an important role in ovulatory dysfunction and oocyte quality, as the functionality of NOSs are disturbed. Lastly, studies including a metanalysis show decreased serum or plasma serum nitrate/nitrite in this disorder, meaning low protein nitration [134].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Simplified model outlining NOS dysfunction and modulation of ROS in PCOS- High concentrations of ADMA functions to competitively inhibit NOS at the L-Arg binding site, resulting in O2•− and free L-Arg accumulation. The accumulated L-Arg may be consumed under these conditions by arginase to give ornithine and urea. Other sources for O2•− are NADPH oxidase, xanthine reductase, mitochondrial damage, zinc deficiency, and high macrophage activity, which may be increased in PCOS. O2•− without sufficient NO will not produce ONOO resulting in low observed protein nitration. Accumulation of O2•− either slowly decays to H2O2 or in the presence of sufficient zinc is dismutased by SOD into H2O2. The low reported zinc concentrations and high copper in PCOS suggests low SOD activity. H2O2 then is converted to H2O by catalase and/or reacts with free metals such as iron and copper through the Fenton reaction to generate the highly toxic OH, resulting in lipid peroxidation events

Metallic compounds, proinflammatory mediators, SOD dysfunction and distribution of ROS in PCOS

It is known that women with PCOS are deficient in several minerals such as zinc, magnesium, calcium, and potassium [109, 110, 135]. In particular, zinc, an essential cofactor and a signaling ion for NOS dimeric activity [43] is necessary for the oocyte to form a fertilization-competent egg through its anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and antioxidant properties [136,137,138]. Serum zinc concentrations has been reported low (Fig. 2) in patients with PCOS [139,140,141], which may drive NOS dysfunction and a deprivation of NO bioavailability. Further, Lai [116] and colleagues demonstrated in porcine oocytes that zinc was a critical trace mineral for maintaining oocyte quality by regulating mitochondrial function and autophagy. Insufficient zinc and/or H4B can cause alterations to NOS dimeric functioning [43] and impaired antioxidant defense [115, 117, 118] resulting in detrimental effects to NO levels, spindle/chromatin integrity, and oocyte quality.

Notably, when O2•− activity is increased it may reduce NO bioavailability through a reaction resulting in the production of ONOO. ONOO may then disturb the cysteine residues in the zinc cluster of NOS resulting in the release of zinc and further modification of NOS functionality, NO deficiency, and oxidative stress generation [43, 142]. O2•− may also undergo a nonenzymatic or SOD-catalyzed reaction to generate H2O2, and both can contribute to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, by monocytes, and macrophages [143,144,145] and can participate in the consumption of NO. It is of note that SOD has been found to be lower in PCOS patients compared to control [146]. Two forms of SOD bind to zinc, the first is copper/zinc SOD (CuZnSOD or SOD1), and the second is extracellular SOD (ECSOD or SOD3) which also binds Cu and Zn. Significantly lower activity of SOD1 and Cu/Zn concentration were found in a group of women with PCOS compared to control [147]. Insulin resistance in PCOS women causes further decrease in SOD1 activity, while Cu concentration and the value of Cu/Zn was increased when compared to women with normal insulin levels [147]. SOD1 is present in the cytosol, nucleus, peroxisomes, and in small amounts in the mitochondrial membrane of cells and acts to lower the steady-state concentration of O2•− by dismutating it to H2O2 [148]. Once the SOD enzymes dismutase O2•− to H2O2, enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase, peroxiredoxins, and catalase, enzymatically convert H2O2 to water [149,150,151], which may explain the low reported accumulation of H2O2 in PCOS [152]. Zinc deficiency or mutations in SOD1 resulting in a zinc deficient enzyme may disrupt SOD1’s function creating a shift to prooxidant activity [148, 153,154,155]. Conversely, if H2O2 production increases and is not removed promptly by antioxidants it can generate the more cytotoxic hydroxyl radical (OH) that contributes to lipid peroxidation [104, 156] (Fig. 2) known to be associated with PCOS through reaction with trace amounts of transition metals such as iron, cobalt and copper either by the Fenton reaction or Haber-Weiss reactions [157]. In a prospective case control study, Baskol and colleagues [158] reported that serum xanthine oxidase (XO) (a generator of ROS) activities were higher in women with PCOS than in control women while and antioxidant status is decreased as ascertained by decreased lipid antioxidant paraoxonase 1 (PON1) activity [158]. This would suggest that PCOS women are under oxidative stress with resultant XO-mediated lipid peroxidation. This can further be proven through the reported increase in MDA, a marker of lipid peroxidation, in patients with PCOS [23, 159]. The associated increase in lipid peroxidation may also be due to increase glutathione oxidase activity, scavenging of ONOO-, which with decreased CuZnSOD mRNA in the FF of patients with PCOS [160] contribute to the reported decrease in H2O2. This may be due to nutritional zinc deficiency common in PCOS patients, causing an imbalance in the Zn/Cu ratio and subsequent malfunction of SOD. All indications then support the notion that in PCOS, OH and O2•− are the specific ROS driving the disorder.

Because of this, and the known inflammatory state contributing and resulting from metabolic dysfunctions in PCOS, antioxidant therapy such as vitamins C and E, N-Acetylcysteine (NAC), Coenzyme Q (CoQ10), Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA), omega 3, selenium, and melatonin, to name a few, have been studied in PCOS [161,162,163]. It has been concluded that although antioxidant supplementation proves beneficial in relieving several PCOS pathogenic parameters including overall oxidative stress, IR, androgen levels, and follicular maturation, research regarding dosage, long-term use, potential hazards to offspring growth and development, and individual disease profile of each patient must be expanded.

Conclusion

In this work, we have reviewed the clinical and oxidative stress mechanism associated with anovulation in PCOS. We reviewed experimental and clinical data that suggest NO pathway and deficiency in PCOS is the ultimate factor in ovulatory dysfunction, chronic anovulation and poor oocyte quality in PCOS. NO has not been shown to influence the pulsatile hormone production in the preoptic nucleus where GnRH neurons originate. However, we have produced evidence that ADMA functions to competitively inhibit NOS by binding to the L-Arg binding site, which then increases free L-Arg bioavailability, allowing for consumption by arginase and NOS dysfunction with subsequent decrease in NO and increase in ADMA induced O2•− production. The resultant higher production of O2•− from NOS dysfunction mediates DNA damage and impairs the antioxidant defense, which have been implicated as contributory factors for the development of PCOS. Therefore, as suggested by Li and collaborators [164] strategies that would increase DDAH1 activity in ovarian cells may provide a novel approach for ameliorating anovulation in PCOS.

Future research efforts should concentrate on the role of NO in the preoptic nucleus to determine whether it has an influence on frequency and amplitude of GnRH firing that coordinates FSH and LH production in the pituitary gland that culminate in ovulation. Until such studies are done, the authors propose treatment that that would increase DDAH1 activity in ovarian cells or decrease the expression of cGMP and cAMP that could increase NO production in PCOS. In addition, the use of potassium channel openers, an ADMA inhibitor or NO donor may prove beneficial to PCOS patients.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

PCOS:

Polycystic ovary syndrome

NO:

nitric oxide

iNOS:

inducible nitric oxide synthase

nNOS:

neuronal nitric oxide synthase

eNOS:

endothelial nitric oxide synthase

H2O2 :

hydrogen peroxide

ADMA:

asymmetric dimethylarginine

DDAH1:

dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1

O2 :

superoxide

SOD:

superoxide dismutase

IR:

insulin resistance

LH:

Luteinizing hormone

FSH:

follicle stimulating hormone

GnRH:

gonadotropin-releasing hormone

cAMP:

cyclic adenosine monophosphate

ROS:

reactive oxygen species

OH:

hydroxyl radical

ONOO- :

peroxynitrite

RNS:

reactive nitrogen species

NO2 - :

nitrite

NO3 - :

nitrate

CC:

clomiphene citrate

References

  1. Knochenhauer ES, et al. Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected black and white women of the southeastern United States: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(9):3078–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asuncion M, et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(7):2434–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dumesic DA, et al. Scientific Statement on the Diagnostic Criteria, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Molecular Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(5):487–525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Group ECW. Health and fertility in World Health Organization group 2 anovulatory women. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):586–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton-Fairley D, Taylor A. Anovulation BMJ. 2003;327(7414):546–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker J, O’Brien C, Gersh FL. Developmental origins and transgenerational inheritance of polycystic ovary syndrome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;61(6):922–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hewlett M, et al. Prenatal exposure to endocrine disruptors: a developmental etiology for polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(1):19–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbott DH, Dumesic DA, Levine JE. Hyperandrogenic origins of polycystic ovary syndrome - implications for pathophysiology and therapy. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2019;14(2):131–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbott DH, et al. In utero androgen excess: a developmental commonality preceding polycystic ovary syndrome? Front Horm Res. 2019;53:1–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stener-Victorin E et al. Animal models to understand the etiology and pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Rev, 2020. 41(4).

  11. Naigaonkar A, et al. Altered redox status may contribute to aberrant folliculogenesis and poor reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(10):2609–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohammadi M. Oxidative stress and polycystic ovary syndrome: a brief review. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10:86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez F, et al. Elevated serum levels of Tumor necrosis factor alpha in normal-weight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 1999;48(4):437–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hotamisligil GS. Mechanisms of TNF-alpha-induced insulin resistance. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1999;107(2):119–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernández-Jiménez JL, et al. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: signs and feedback effects of hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022;38(1):2–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dabravolski SA et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Mol Sci, 2021. 22(8).

  17. Zeber-Lubecka N, Ciebiera M, Hennig EE. Polycystic ovary syndrome and oxidative stress-from bench to Bedside. Int J Mol Sci, 2023. 24(18).

  18. Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(7):363–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiorcea-Paquim AM. 8-oxoguanine and 8-oxodeoxyguanosine biomarkers of oxidative DNA damage: a review on HPLC-ECD determination. Molecules, 2022. 27(5).

  20. Sova H, et al. Distinctively low levels of serum 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2670–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly CC, et al. Low grade chronic inflammation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(6):2453–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mouanness M et al. Contribution of Advanced Glycation End products to PCOS Key Elements: a narrative review. Nutrients, 2022. 14(17).

  23. Enechukwu CI, et al. Oxidative stress markers and lipid profiles of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62(5):335–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudnicka E, et al. OXIDATIVE STRESS AND REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION: oxidative stress in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reproduction. 2022;164(6):F145–f154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li W, et al. Oxidative stress and antioxidant imbalance in ovulation disorder in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1018674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Azziz R, et al. The androgen excess and PCOS Society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(2):456–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Munro MG, et al. The FIGO Ovulatory disorders classification system. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(4):768–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Siddiqui S, et al. A brief insight into the etiology, genetics, and immunology of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(11):2439–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chappell NR, Gibbons WE, Blesson CS. Pathology of hyperandrogenemia in the oocyte of polycystic ovary syndrome. Steroids. 2022;180:108989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Liao B, et al. Effects of Androgen excess-related metabolic disturbances on Granulosa cell function and Follicular Development. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:815968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Immediata V et al. Oxidative Stress and Human Ovarian Response-From Somatic Ovarian Cells to Oocytes Damage: A Clinical Comprehensive Narrative Review Antioxidants (Basel), 2022. 11(7).

  32. Chappel S. The role of mitochondria from mature oocyte to viable blastocyst Obstet Gynecol Int, 2013. 2013: p. 183024.

  33. Wang LY, et al. Mitochondrial functions on oocytes and preimplantation embryos. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009;10(7):483–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaeib F, et al. The Defensive Role of Cumulus Cells against Reactive Oxygen Species Insult in metaphase II mouse oocytes. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(4):498–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Banerjee J, et al. Peroxynitrite affects the cumulus cell defense of metaphase II mouse oocytes leading to disruption of the spindle structure in vitro. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(2):578–584e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruegsegger GN, et al. Altered mitochondrial function in insulin-deficient and insulin-resistant states. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(9):3671–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim JA, Wei Y, Sowers JR. Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in insulin resistance. Circ Res. 2008;102(4):401–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis MT et al. Quantification of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in metabolic Disease: application to type 2 Diabetes. Int J Mol Sci, 2019. 20(21).

  39. Bardaweel SK, et al. Reactive oxygen species: the dual role in physiological and pathological conditions of the human body. Eurasian J Med. 2018;50(3):193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Izyumov DS, et al. Mitochondria as source of reactive oxygen species under oxidative stress. Study with novel mitochondria-targeted antioxidants–the Skulachev-ion derivatives. Biochem (Mosc). 2010;75(2):123–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cubero FJ, Nieto N. Arachidonic acid stimulates TNFα production in Kupffer cells via a reactive oxygen species-pERK1/2-Egr1-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303(2):G228–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lassègue B, San A, Martín, Griendling KK. Biochemistry, physiology, and pathophysiology of NADPH oxidases in the cardiovascular system. Circ Res. 2012;110(10):1364–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Camp OG, et al. Hypochlorous acid facilitates inducible nitric oxide synthase subunit dissociation: the link between heme destruction, disturbance of the zinc-tetrathiolate center, and the prevention by melatonin. Nitric Oxide. 2022;124:32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and Disease. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(1):315–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stadler K. Peroxynitrite-driven mechanisms in Diabetes and insulin resistance - the latest advances. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(2):280–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Basini G, Grasselli F. Nitric oxide in follicle development and oocyte competence. Reproduction. 2015;150(1):R1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Goud AP, et al. Nitric oxide delays oocyte aging. Biochemistry. 2005;44(34):11361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jablonka-Shariff A, Olson LM. Nitric oxide is essential for optimal meiotic maturation of murine cumulus-oocyte complexes in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55(4):412–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nakamura Y, et al. Nitric oxide inhibits oocyte meiotic maturation. Biol Reprod. 2002;67(5):1588–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Li J et al. Nitric oxide synthase is involved in Follicular Development via the PI3K/AKT/FoxO3a pathway in neonatal and immature rats. Anim (Basel), 2020. 10(2).

  51. Krishna MB, et al. Impaired arginine metabolism coupled to a defective Redox Conduit contributes to low plasma nitric oxide in polycystic ovary syndrome. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;43(5):1880–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Prevot V, et al. Estradiol coupling to endothelial nitric oxide stimulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone release from rat median eminence via a membrane receptor. Endocrinology. 1999;140(2):652–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. McCartney CR, Eagleson CA, Marshall JC. Regulation of gonadotropin secretion: implications for polycystic ovary syndrome. Semin Reprod Med. 2002;20(4):317–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ishihara T, et al. Sex difference in the expression and regulation of nitric oxide synthase gene in the rat preoptic area. Neurosci Res. 2002;43(2):147–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lein ES, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007;445(7124):168–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McCosh RB et al. Evidence that nitric oxide is critical for LH Surge Generation in Female Sheep. Endocrinology, 2020. 161(3).

  57. Krsmanović LZ, et al. Calcium signaling and episodic secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in hypothalamic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(18):8462–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Krsmanovic LZ, et al. Regulation of Ca2+-sensitive adenylyl cyclase in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15(3):429–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kanasaki H, Purwana IN, Miyazaki K. Possible role of PACAP and its PAC1 receptor in the differential regulation of pituitary LHbeta- and FSHbeta-subunit gene expression by pulsatile GnRH stimulation. Biol Reprod. 2013;88(2):35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Holesh JE, Bass AN, Lord M. Physiology, Ovulation, in StatPearls. 2023, StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL).

  61. Daniels TL, Berga SL. Resistance of gonadotropin releasing hormone drive to sex steroid-induced suppression in hyperandrogenic anovulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(12):4179–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pastor CL, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: evidence for reduced sensitivity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator to inhibition by estradiol and progesterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(2):582–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Eagleson CA, et al. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: evidence that flutamide restores sensitivity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator to inhibition by estradiol and progesterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4047–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Brüne B, von Knethen A, Sandau KB. Nitric oxide and its role in apoptosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;351(3):261–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Takahashi T, Ogiwara K. cAMP signaling in ovarian physiology in teleosts: a review. Cell Signal. 2023;101:110499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Shkolnik K, et al. Reactive oxygen species are indispensable in ovulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(4):1462–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Robker RL, Hennebold JD, Russell DL. Coordination of Ovulation and Oocyte Maturation: a good egg at the right time. Endocrinology. 2018;159(9):3209–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang Z, Huang L, Brayboy L. Macrophages: An Indispensable Piece of Ovarian Health Biol Reprod. 2021;104(3):527–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wu R, et al. Macrophage contributions to ovarian function. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(2):119–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kumar P, Sait SF. Luteinizing hormone and its dilemma in ovulation induction. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(1):2–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Esparza LA et al. Hyperactive LH pulses and elevated kisspeptin and NKB gene expression in the Arcuate Nucleus of a PCOS Mouse Model. Endocrinology, 2020. 161(4).

  72. Luo Y, et al. The role of miRNAs in polycystic ovary syndrome with insulin resistance. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(2):289–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Castillo-Higuera T, et al. A comprehensive overview of common polymorphic variants in genes related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(9):2399–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Welt CK. Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: what is New? Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2021;50(1):71–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Mansour A, et al. Ovarian volume, not follicle count, is independently associated with androgens in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22(1):298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Williams T, Moore JB, Regehr J. Polycystic ovary syndrome: common questions and answers. Am Fam Physician. 2023;107(3):264–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Rosenfield RL, Ehrmann DA. The pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the hypothesis of PCOS as functional ovarian hyperandrogenism revisited. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(5):467–520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Lobo RA, et al. Elevations in unbound serum estradiol as a possible mechanism for inappropriate gonadotropin secretion in women with PCO. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;52(1):156–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Dumitrescu R, et al. The polycystic ovary syndrome: an update on metabolic and hormonal mechanisms. J Med Life. 2015;8(2):142–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. DeVane GW, et al. Circulating gonadotropins, estrogens, and androgens in polycystic ovarian Disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;121(4):496–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Tontonoz P, Nagy L. Regulation of macrophage gene expression by peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor gamma: implications for Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10(6):485–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Lee CH, Evans RM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in macrophage lipid homeostasis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2002;13(8):331–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Jasper M, Norman RJ. Immunoactive interleukin-1 beta and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in thecal, stromal and granulosa cell cultures from normal and polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(6):1352–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Zolti M, et al. Cytokine levels in follicular fluid of polycystic ovaries in patients treated with dexamethasone. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(3):501–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Deshpande RR, et al. Alteration of cytokine production in follicular cystic ovaries induced in mice by neonatal estradiol injection. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2000;44(2):80–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Amato G, et al. Serum and follicular fluid cytokines in polycystic ovary syndrome during stimulated cycles. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(6):1177–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Gilliver SC. Sex steroids as inflammatory regulators. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;120(2–3):105–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Rudnicka E et al. Chronic low Grade inflammation in Pathogenesis of PCOS. Int J Mol Sci, 2021. 22(7).

  89. Morin-Papunen L, et al. Metformin reduces serum C-reactive protein levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(10):4649–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Stocco C. Aromatase expression in the ovary: hormonal and molecular regulation. Steroids. 2008;73(5):473–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Snyder GD, et al. Nitric oxide inhibits aromatase activity: mechanisms of action. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;58(1):63–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Raju GA, et al. Luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone synergy: a review of role in controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6(4):227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Casper RF. Aromatase inhibitors in ovarian stimulation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;106(1–5):71–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Bonavera JJ, et al. Evidence that nitric oxide may mediate the ovarian steroid-induced luteinizing hormone surge: involvement of excitatory amino acids. Endocrinology. 1993;133(6):2481–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bonavera JJ, Kalra PS, Kalra SP. L-arginine/nitric oxide amplifies the magnitude and duration of the luteinizing hormone surge induced by estrogen: involvement of neuropeptide Y. Endocrinology. 1996;137(5):1956–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Russell JM, et al. Effect of steroids and nitric oxide on pituitary hormone release in ovariectomized, peripubertal rats. Reproduction. 2005;129(4):497–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Bonello N, et al. Inhibition of nitric oxide: effects on interleukin-1 beta-enhanced ovulation rate, steroid hormones, and ovarian leukocyte distribution at ovulation in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1996;54(2):436–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Luo Y, et al. Roles of nitric oxide in the Regulation of Reproduction: a review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:752410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Shukovski L, Tsafriri A. The involvement of nitric oxide in the ovulatory process in the rat. Endocrinology. 1994;135(5):2287–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Mandhane PJ, et al. Changes in exhaled nitric oxide related to estrogen and progesterone during the menstrual cycle. Chest. 2009;136(5):1301–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Cicinelli E, et al. Circulating levels of nitric oxide in fertile women in relation to the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(6):1036–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Ota H, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the endometrium during the menstrual cycle in patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(2):303–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Legro RS, et al. The pregnancy in polycystic ovary syndrome II study: baseline characteristics and effects of obesity from a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(1):258–269e8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Winterbourn CC. Toxicity of iron and hydrogen peroxide: the Fenton reaction. Toxicol Lett, 1995. 82–3: p. 969 – 74.

  105. Dunnam RC, et al. Ovarian hormone secretory response to gonadotropins and nitric oxide following chronic nitric oxide deficiency in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1999;60(4):959–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Nathan C, Xie QW. Nitric oxide synthases: roles, tolls, and controls. Cell. 1994;78(6):915–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Li H, et al. Crystal structures of zinc-free and -bound heme domain of human inducible nitric-oxide synthase. Implications for dimer stability and comparison with endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(30):21276–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Sanchez-Garrido MA, Tena-Sempere M. Metabolic dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome: pathogenic role of androgen excess and potential therapeutic strategies. Mol Metab. 2020;35:100937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Schmalbrock LJ et al. Pronounced Trace element variation in follicular fluids of Subfertile Women undergoing assisted Reproduction. Nutrients, 2021. 13(11).

  110. Shenta A, Saud K, Al-Shawi A. Assessment the correlations of hormones, lipid profiles, oxidative stress, and Zinc Concentration in Iraqi Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;9(3):270–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Hosseini-Tabatabaei A, Abdollahi M. Potassium channel openers and improvement of toxic stress: do they have role in the management of inflammatory bowel Disease? Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2008;7(3):129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Mahran A, et al. Nitric oxide donors improve the ovulation and pregnancy rates in anovulatory women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with clomiphene citrate: a RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(1):9–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Kodama H, et al. High incidence of embryo transfer cancellations in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(8):1962–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Akdemir N, et al. The correlation of serum asymmetric dimethylarginine and anti-Müllerian hormone in primary dysmenorrhea. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016;32(8):414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Hyderali BN, Mala K. Oxidative stress and cardiovascular Complications in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;191:15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Lai XL, et al. Zinc deficiency compromises the maturational competence of porcine oocyte by inducing mitophagy and apoptosis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;252:114593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Khashchenko E et al. Activation of systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome in combination with metabolic disorders and excessive body weight. J Clin Med, 2020. 9(5).

  118. Hu M, et al. Hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance induce gravid uterine defects in association with mitochondrial dysfunction and aberrant reactive oxygen species production. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019;316(5):E794–E809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Ming XF, et al. Arginase II promotes macrophage inflammatory responses through mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, contributing to Insulin Resistance and Atherogenesis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1(4):e000992.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Bódis J, et al. Negative association of L-arginine methylation products with oocyte numbers. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(12):3095–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Tasali E, Van Cauter E, Ehrmann DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med Clin. 2008;3(1):37–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Choi YS, et al. Serum asymmetric dimethylarginine, apelin, and Tumor necrosis factor-α levels in non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Steroids. 2012;77(13):1352–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Heutling D, et al. Asymmetrical dimethylarginine, inflammatory and metabolic parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome before and after metformin treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(1):82–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Rojas J et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome, insulin resistance, and obesity: navigating the pathophysiologic labyrinth Int J Reprod Med, 2014. 2014: p. 719050.

  125. Caldwell RW, et al. Arginase: a multifaceted enzyme important in Health and Disease. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(2):641–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Vockley JG, et al. Cloning and characterization of the human type II arginase gene. Genomics. 1996;38(2):118–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Dizikes GJ, et al. Isolation of human liver arginase cDNA and demonstration of nonhomology between the two human arginase genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1986;141(1):53–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Gannon PO, et al. Androgen-regulated expression of arginase 1, arginase 2 and interleukin-8 in human Prostate cancer. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(8):e12107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Momma TY, Ottaviani JI. There is no direct competition between arginase and nitric oxide synthase for the common substrate l-arginine. Nitric Oxide. 2022;129:16–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Elms S, et al. Insights into the arginine paradox: evidence against the importance of subcellular location of arginase and eNOS. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;305(5):H651–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Wu G, Morris SM Jr. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond Biochem J, 1998. 336 (Pt 1)(Pt 1): p. 1–17.

  132. Zhao Y, et al. Metabolic profiles characterizing different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome: plasma metabolomics analysis. BMC Med. 2012;10:153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Kyselova A, et al. Association between arginase-containing platelet-derived microparticles and altered plasma arginine metabolism in polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 2019;90:16–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Meng C. Nitric oxide (NO) levels in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(9):4083–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Pokorska-Niewiada K, Brodowska A, Szczuko M. The content of minerals in the PCOS Group and the correlation with the parameters of metabolism. Nutrients, 2021. 13(7).

  136. Suzuki T, et al. Dietary zinc deficiency induces oxidative stress and promotes Tumor necrosis factor-alpha- and interleukin-1beta-induced RANKL expression in rat bone. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2016;58(2):122–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Sunderman FW Jr. The influence of zinc on apoptosis. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1995;25(2):134–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Garner TB, et al. Role of zinc in female reproduction. Biol Reprod. 2021;104(5):976–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Abedini M, et al. Zinc status and polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2019;52:216–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Nasiadek M et al. The role of zinc in selected female Reproductive System disorders. Nutrients, 2020. 12(8).

  141. Yin J, et al. Serum Trace Elements in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:572384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Zou MH, Shi C, Cohen RA. Oxidation of the zinc-thiolate complex and uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by peroxynitrite. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(6):817–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Fujii J, Homma T, Osaki T. Superoxide Radicals in the Execution of Cell Death Antioxidants (Basel), 2022. 11(3).

  144. Mitra S, Abraham E. Participation of superoxide in neutrophil activation and cytokine production. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1762(8):732–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Arango Duque G, Descoteaux A. Macrophage cytokines: involvement in immunity and infectious Diseases. Front Immunol. 2014;5:491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Özdemir Başer Ö, Göçmen AY, Aydoğan D, Kırmızı. The role of inflammation, oxidation and Cystatin-C in the pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;19(3):229–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Bizoń A et al. The activity of Superoxide dismutase, its relationship with the concentration of zinc and copper and the prevalence of rs2070424 superoxide dismutase gene in women with polycystic ovary syndrome-preliminary study. J Clin Med, 2022. 11(9).

  148. Valentine JS, Doucette PA, Zittin S, Potter. Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:563–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Nohl H, Jordan W. The metabolic fate of mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide. Eur J Biochem. 1980;111(1):203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Oberley TD, et al. Localization of the thioredoxin system in normal rat kidney. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001;30(4):412–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Esworthy RS, Ho YS, Chu FF. The Gpx1 gene encodes mitochondrial glutathione peroxidase in the mouse liver. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997;340(1):59–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. McCord JM, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase. An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J Biol Chem. 1969;244(22):6049–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Homma K, et al. SOD1 as a molecular switch for initiating the homeostatic ER stress response under zinc deficiency. Mol Cell. 2013;52(1):75–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Bruijn LI, et al. Elevated free nitrotyrosine levels, but not protein-bound nitrotyrosine or hydroxyl radicals, throughout Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)-like Disease implicate tyrosine nitration as an aberrant in vivo property of one familial ALS-linked superoxide dismutase 1 mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(14):7606–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Olin KL, et al. Extracellular superoxide dismutase activity is affected by dietary zinc intake in nonhuman primate and rodent models. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;61(6):1263–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Di Marzo N, Chisci E, Giovannoni R. The role of Hydrogen Peroxide in Redox-Dependent Signaling: homeostatic and pathological responses in mammalian cells. Cells, 2018. 7(10).

  157. Prousek J. Fenton chemistry in biology and medicine. Pure Appl Chem. 2007;79(12):2325–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Baskol G, et al. Assessment of paraoxonase 1, xanthine oxidase and glutathione peroxidase activities, nitric oxide and thiol levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(3):326–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Sabuncu T, et al. Oxidative stress in polycystic ovary syndrome and its contribution to the risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Clin Biochem. 2001;34(5):407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Seleem AK, et al. Superoxide dismutase in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(4):499–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. Cheng X, He B. Clinical and biochemical potential of antioxidants in treating polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Womens Health. 2022;14:467–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Zhao J, et al. Effects of antioxidant intervention in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med (Baltim). 2022;101(32):e30006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Amini L, et al. Antioxidants and management of polycystic ovary syndrome in Iran: a systematic review of clinical trials. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13(1):1–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Li T, et al. The ADMA-DDAH1 axis in ovarian apoptosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2023;225:106180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Andrew PJ, Mayer B. Enzymatic function of nitric oxide synthases. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43(3):521–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Forstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(7):837a–837d. 829 – 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Goud AP, et al. Reactive oxygen species and oocyte aging: role of superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hypochlorous acid. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44(7):1295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Khan AA, Alsahli MA, Rahmani AH. Myeloperoxidase as an active Disease Biomarker: recent biochemical and pathological perspectives. Med Sci (Basel), 2018. 6(2).

  169. Varela CD, Farhana A. Biochemistry, Superoxides, in StatPearls. 2023: Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Aisha Farhana declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

  170. Shaeib F, et al. Impact of hydrogen peroxide-driven Fenton reaction on mouse oocyte quality. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;58:154–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Mates JM, Perez-Gomez C. Nunez De Castro, antioxidant enzymes and human Diseases. Clin Biochem. 1999;32(8):595–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Sylus AM, et al. Clomiphene citrate increases nitric oxide, interleukin-10 and reduces matrix metalloproteinase-9 in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Tepavčević S, et al. Cardiac nitric oxide synthases and Na+/K+-ATPase in the Rat Model of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Induced by Dihydrotestosterone. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2015;123(5):303–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Willis GR, et al. Detailed characterisation of circulatory nitric oxide and free radical indices–is there evidence for abnormal cardiovascular homeostasis in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome? BJOG. 2014;121(13):1596–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Walch K, Kolbus A, Hefler-Frischmuth K. Polymorphisms of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene in premenopausal women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Maturitas. 2008;61(3):256–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Nácul AP, et al. Nitric oxide and fibrinogen in polycystic ovary syndrome: associations with insulin resistance and obesity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;133(2):191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Batóg G, et al. The interplay of oxidative stress and immune dysfunction in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and polycystic ovary syndrome: a comprehensive review. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1211231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. Srnovršnik T, Virant-Klun I, Pinter B. Heavy Metals and Essential Elements in Association with oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary Syndrome-A systematic review. Antioxid (Basel), 2023. 12(7).

  179. Yuan J, Wen X, Jia M. Efficacy of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on hormones, oxidative stress, and inflammatory parameters among polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(8):8991–9001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Tosatti JAG, et al. Influence of n-3 fatty acid supplementation on inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2021;125(6):657–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Tabrizi R, et al. The effects of Probiotic supplementation on clinical Symptom, Weight loss, Glycemic Control, lipid and hormonal profiles, biomarkers of inflammation, and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2022;14(1):1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Akbari M, et al. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Horm Metab Res. 2018;50(4):271–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Murri M, et al. Circulating markers of oxidative stress and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(3):268–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Kaltsas A et al. The Silent Threat to Women’s Fertility: Uncovering the Devastating Effects of Oxidative Stress. Antioxid (Basel), 2023. 12(8).

  185. Jamil M, et al. Reactive oxygen species in reproduction: harmful, essential or both? Zygote. 2020;28(4):255–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Cozzolino M, Seli E. Mitochondrial function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(3):205–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Jiang Y et al. Applications of Melatonin in Female Reproduction in the Context of Oxidative Stress Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2021. 2021: p. 6668365.

  188. Wang L, et al. Oxidative stress in oocyte aging and female reproduction. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(12):7966–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Yang Z, et al. Controlling chronic low-grade inflammation to improve follicle development and survival. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020;84(2):e13265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Lu J, et al. A novel and compact review on the role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. Barrea L, et al. Source and amount of carbohydrate in the diet and inflammation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Nutr Res Rev. 2018;31(2):291–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Pandey AK, et al. Impact of stress on female reproductive health disorders: possible beneficial effects of shatavari (Asparagus racemosus). Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:46–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Ávila J, et al. Oxidative stress in Granulosa-Lutein cells from in Vitro Fertilization patients. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(12):1656–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Agarwal A, et al. The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA, OC, and HAS wrote the main manuscript. OC and HAS prepared Figs. 1 and 2. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Awoniyi O. Awonuga.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Awonuga, A.O., Camp, O.G. & Abu-Soud, H.M. A review of nitric oxide and oxidative stress in typical ovulatory women and in the pathogenesis of ovulatory dysfunction in PCOS. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 21, 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01159-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01159-6

Keywords