Skip to main content
Download PDF

Alterations of miR-16, miR-let-7a and their target genes expression in human blastocysts following vitrification and re-vitrification

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 19, Article number: 155 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Embryo cryopreservation is a widely used technique in infertility management and today is an essential part of assisted reproductive technology (ART). In some cases, re-vitrification can be applied to good quality supernumerary warmed embryos that have not been transferred in the present cycle. However, there is no study about re-vitrification impact on microRNA and gene expression in human embryos. The purpose of this study is to evaluate miR-16, miR-let7a and target genes expression in in vitro produced human blastocysts following re-vitrification.

Day3 embryos obtained from ICSI cycles of fertile couples referring for family balancing program were biopsied and cultured individually. On the fourth day (post-ICSI) male ones (choices of their parents) were transferred and the females (good quality embryos) were donated for research. Donated embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage and assigned to three groups: fresh, vitrified and re-vitrification. Embryos were vitrified on Cryotech carriers. Then blastocysts of three groups were individually assessed for expression of miR-16, miR-let7a and target genes.

The results showed that re-vitrification of human blastocysts did not affect the ability to re-expand in culture. In addition, significant decrease was observed in miR-16 and miR-let7a expression in re-vitrified group compared to fresh (p < 0.05). A significant upregulation of the target genes ITGβ3 and BCL-2 in re-vitrified and vitrified embryos was observed compared to the fresh group (p < 0.05). The expression of BAX as a pro-apoptotic gene showed a significant decrease in re-vitrification group comparing with the fresh one (P < 0.05).

The results of this research indicated that re-vitrification of embryos changes the expression of miR-16, miR-let-7a and their target genes. These alterations include increased expression of BCl-2 and ITGβ3 genes which play important roles in embryo survival and implantation, respectively. Clinical proof of these effects requires further research.

Introduction

Embryo cryopreservation is one of the most widely used techniques in infertility management. This technique plays a key role in preserving fertility potential of those suffering from premature ovarian failure and also provides an embryo resource to be thawed/warmed for subsequent use in further treatment cycles. Furthermore, embryo “re-freezing” due to the embryologist’s discretion can be applied to good quality supernumerary thawed/warmed embryos that have not been transferred in the present cycle. Sometimes re-vitrfication becomes inevitable, such as in cases like vitrification of embryos whose oocytes of origin have been vitrified before or embryos genetically tested after warming and many of them are healthy and transferable yet supernumerary [1,2,3].

In 2001, Fahrat et al. reported the first successful pregnancy and birth from transfer of human embryos that had been subjected to two freeze-thaw cycles [4]. Few studies have been performed on re-verification of mouse embryos, indicating re-verification did not have any effects on developmental potential and gene expression [5, 6]. Re-verification of embryos seems to be a successful and useful method for preserving extra embryos, but so far, its safety and genetic and epigenetic effects of re-verification/warming of human embryos have not been studied.

MicroRNAs are innate, small noncoding RNAs with 20–23 nucleotides in length, having an important role in controlling posttranscriptional gene expression and are regulated by genetic and environmental conditions. To date the importance of microRNAs has been recognized in primary developmental steps including embryo implantation, development, cell growth, and differentiation in many species from C.elegans to mammals [7, 8].

Today it has been shown microRNAs play key roles during implantation [8]. MiR-let7 is among the first discovered microRNAs which is phylogenetically preserved as well. Previous studies indicate decreased levels of this microRNA in mouse embryos prior to implantation [9, 10] In a study by Liu et al. [11] it was shown that let-7a is involved in implantation process, partly via regulation of integrin-β3 expression. Integrins are transmembrane heterodimer glycoproteins and are expressed by trophectoderm during implantation and mediate embryonic adhesion through binding to an extracellular mediatory ligand [12].

Nowadays research has shown microRNAs are directly and indirectly involved in apoptosis process. Apoptosis or programmed cell death is an important factor in embryonic developmental arrest, which is triggered by activation, expression and regulation of some apoptotic gene families such as BCL and caspase, as well as microRNAs (miRNAs) [13, 14]. MicroRNA-16 has an effective regulatory role in several cellular and biological processes including apoptosis, cell cycle and inhibition of cell proliferation and differentiation. BCL-2 is a target for microRNA-16 and its decline by microRNA-16 leads to apoptosis [15]. Chimino et al. [16] have shown miR-15 and miR-16 expression are inversely related to Bcl-2 expression in acute lymphatic leukemia. Zhao et al. [17] observed a higher expression of miR-16 in cryopreserved mouse blastocyst compared to the fresh ones.

Based on our knowledge in this field, there is no study concerning the effect of re-vitrification/re-warming and repeated exposure to cryoprotectants on human embryos. Therefore, in the present study expression of miR-let7a, miR-16 and their target genes will be studied in human blastocysts following vitrification and re-vitrification.

Methods and material

Ethical considerations

Blastocyst collection was done regarding ethical codes and approval of Medical Ethics Committee of Tarbiat Modares University, Iran (IR.MODARES.REC.1397.053). Human blastocysts were donated by healthy couples seeking sex-selection (male embryo favored) for family balancing in Gandhi Infertility Center (Tehran, I.R.I.), after signing a written informed consent. It is worth mentioning family balancing is only allowed for couples with at least two children of one sex (e.g. two girls), so sex selection is done for the third offspring.

Blastocyst collection

About 30 good quality human blastocysts donated by fertile couples in reproductive ages (25–35 years old) from family balancing cycles in Gandhi Hospital Infertility Center were included in our study (15 good quality blastocysts for microRNA and gene expression analysis and 15 good quality blastocysts for TUNEL assays). Ovulation stimulation protocol was GnRH-Antagonist utilizing Cetrotide Antagonist (0.25 mg/day) (MerckSerono, Germany) in combination with Recombinant Gonadotropin SinalF (75 IU daily) (SinaClon, Tehran, Iran) and HMG Menogon (75 IU daily) (Ferring, Germany). Once the minimum of three follicles larger than 17 mm in diameter were visualized in the sonogram, 10,000 IU hCG (IBSA, Switzerland) was injected and after 36 h, oocyte retrieval was commenced under ultrasound guidance. Fertilization by ICSI were performed following standard protocols. All culture media were purchased from Life Global Company (Denmark). After injection, oocytes were cultured in Life Global medium until day 3. On the 3rd day, eight cell embryos were placed in Ca + 2 and Mg + 2 free culture medium to disrupt cell adhesion. Embryo biopsy was performed using Eppendorf Micromanipulators (Micromanipulator TransferMan, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). To create an artificial hole in the zona pellucida, hatching was performed mechanically. A single blastomere was removed from each embryo and was assessed for the presence and number of Y and X chromosome. For sex determination of embryos, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique carried out on biopsied blastomers After blastomere biopsy of three-day embryos they were cultured individually till day four (post-ICSI) and male ones (choices of their parents) were transferred and the females (good quality embryos) were donated to the research. Donated embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage and then evaluated under inverted microscope (Nikon, Japan) and sorted by Gardner’s criteria [18]. Gardner scoring system is based on the expansion state of the blastocyst and on the consistency of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm cells. In this research we assessed fifth-day good quality (AA or AB: ICM with several tightly packed cells and trophectoderm with numerous cells forming a cohesive epithelium) blastocysts which were in developmental stages of “full blastocyst”, “expanding” and “hatching”. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the collected embryos are given in Table 1.

Table 1 The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the collected embryos
Full size table

Study design

Study design is illustrated in Fig. 1. As shown in the figure blastocysts were randomly assigned to three groups: fresh, cryopreserved once (vitrified) and cryopreserved twice (re-vitrification).

  1. 1)

    Fresh group: In fresh group, blastocysts were cultured in Life Global medium on the fifth day around 8–10 h, then assessed directly.

  2. 2)

    Vitrification group: in vitrification group blastocysts were vitrified and then warmed and cultured for 4 h post-warming in LifeGlobal medium and good-quality embryos were studied.

  3. 3)

    Re-vitrification group: In the third group blastocysts were vitrified, warmed, cultured (4 h) and re-vitrified, warmed, cultured (4 h) and then assessed if they had survived with good quality.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic presentation of the study design. Abbreviations, ICSI: intra cytoplasmic sperm injection

Full size image

It is noteworthy that in our study embryos were assessed individually. Since the gender of preference for transfer was male by donating couples, female embryos were chosen for this research. Five blastocysts were evaluated in all experimental groups.

Vitrification and warming procedures

Blastocysts were first exposed to the equilibration solution containing 7.5% (v/v) Ethylene Glycol (EG, Sigma Aldrich Chemical Company, Germany), 7.5% (v/v) Di methyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma Aldrich Chemical Company, Germany) in HTF medium (Genocell, Tehran, Iran) supplemented with 20% HSA (Human serum albumin, Switzerland) for 15–20 min at room temperature, and then were placed in the vitrification medium 15% EG, 15% DMSO and 0.5 M sucrose (Merck, Germany) in HTF medium plus 20% HSA for up to 1 min. The embryos were loaded on cryotech carriers (Tokyo, Japan) with minimum medium and immediately plunged into liquid nitrogen (LN2). For warming, cryotech was removed from LN2, immediately placed in warming medium (1.0 M sucrose in HTF medium plus 20% HSA) and incubated for 1 min at 37 C. Blastocysts were then placed in dilution solution 1 and 2 (DS1:0.5 M sucrose in HTF plus 20% HAS; DS2: 0.25 M sucrose in HTF plus 20% HAS) each for 3 min. After washing in HTF plus 20% HSA, the blastocysts were cultured for 4 h in LifeGlobal medium at 37 °C in 6% CO2 in an incubator atmosphere.

Evaluation of warmed blastocysts survival

Re-expansion of blastocysts was evaluated by an inverted microscope (Nikon, Japan) after warming and during 2-4 h of culture. The literature has shown re-expansion ability of the blastocyst in the first few hours after warming as an indicator of viability, and high-quality embryos possess faster re-expansion ability after warming. Embryos with poor quality after warming were excluded from the study.

Simultaneous RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

In this phase of study, 15 blastocysts were randomly divided in three groups. Blastocysts were washed individually in droplets of PBS-0.1% PVA (phosphate-buffered saline/Polyvinyl alcohol) and then transferred into microtubes containing 2 μL of lysis buffer [19]. After placing the microtubes on ice, 3 μL Random Hexamer, 5 μL Nuclease-free water, 2 μL miR-16 RT primer, 2 μL miR-let 7a RT primer and 2 μL snord 234 RT primer were added and placed in Thermocycler for 5 min at 75 °C. Then microtubes were placed on ice and for cDNA synthesis 10 U Rnase inhibitor, 10 μL dNTP, 200 U RT enzyme and 5 × RT buffer were added and remained in thermocycler (applied Biosystems) at 25 °C for 10 min, 37 °C for 15 min, 42 °C for 45 min, and 72 °C for 10 min. After the end of reverse transcription, resulting cDNAs were kept at 4 °C overnight. To make sure cDNAs exist, RT-PCR was proceeded for each microtube by adding 5 μL master mix (Taq DNA polymerase master mix red, Ampliqon, Denmark), 1 μL cDNA, 3 μL nuclease-free water and 1 μL b2m primer with the thermal order of 94 °C for 4 min (denaturation), 94 °C for 30s (denaturation), 60 °C for 30s (annealing), and 72 °C for 45 s (extension), followed by 40 cycles. A final elongation step was done at 72 °C for 10 min. Finally, PCR products were run on 2% Agarose gel and visualized by short-wave UV. Complementary DNA synthesized using cDNA Synthesis Kit (Yekt Tajhiz, Iran).

Reverse transcription–qPCR analysis

In this study expression of BAX, BCL2, ITGβ3, miR-let7and miR-16 was assessed by RT-qPCR technique using RealQ Plus Master Mix Green, amplicon (Denmark) and in Applied Biosystems Step One Plus Real-time PCR instrument. The primer sequences which are used for RT-qPCR, are given in Table 2. The final volume of each reaction was 13 μL including 7 mmol/L Master mix, 4 mmol/L nuclease-free water, 1 mmol/L mixture of forward and reverse primers of each gene and microRNA and 1 mmol/L of the synthesized cDNA. The temporal program of RT-qPCR was alternatively adjusted in 95 °C for 2 min, in 95 °C for 5 s for denaturation, in 60 °C for 30s, in 72 °C for 10s for amplification, with 40 cycles of extension. All of the samples were run in duplicate and each of the experiments was conducted in triplicate. B2m reference gene was used as a normalizer for target gene expression and snord was used as a normalizer for microRNA expression.

Table 2 Primers used for quantitative gene expression
Full size table

TUNEL assay and Hoechst staining

Fifteen blastocysts were used for TUNEL assay. TUNEL assessment was executed using an in situ cell death detection kit TMR red (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) based on the company’s instructions. After washing the blastocysts in droplets of PBS-0.1% PVA (phosphate-buffered saline/ Polyvinyl alcohol), they were fixed in 4% of paraformaldehyde in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the blastocysts were permeabilized in 0.1% triton-× 100 + 0.1% sodium citrate for 2 min and incubated with TUNEL reaction mixture for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark. For positive control of TUNEL assay, fixed and permeabilized blastocysts were incubated with 50 IU/ml of DNase I enzyme (Promega, Germany) for 20 min at 37 °C before TUNEL labelling. On the other hand, for Negative controlling, the embryos were incubated with TUNEL reagent without DNase treatment. After TUNEL, the blastocysts were washed in PBS-0.1% PVA and all of the blastocysts’ nuclei were stained using Hoechst33342 (10 μg/ml) for 30s at room temperature in the dark. The blastocysts were three times washed and mounted on the glass slides. Finally, all number of nuclei and apoptotic nuclei were obtained based on the optical image of whole-mount blastocysts using fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan).

Statistical analysis

The SPSS program (ve.16) was used for statistical analysis of the data. Analysis of molecular results was carried out using REST 2009 program (Qiagen). The Kolmograph-Smirnov Statistical test results showed normal distribution of data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc was performed for evaluating the significance of the qPCR and TUNEL results. The data reports were considered as means± SD and the statistical significance was obtained based on P < 0.05.

Results

Thirty donated high-quality human embryos from mothers between 25 and 35 years of age were assessed individually in this study. The embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage and then underwent vitrification and warming. The survival rate of blastocysts was 100% following vitrification/warming or re-vitrification/re-warming in both groups.

The expression of miR-16 and miR-let7 and their target genes ITGβ3, BCL2 and BAX was assessed based on the experimental results.

There was significant decrease in miR-let7a expression in vitrified group compared to the fresh and for re-vitrified versus fresh group (p < 0.05). Also, miR-let7a expression showed a significant decrease in re-vitrified group compared to vitrified (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The Bar graph showing the effects of vitrification and re-vitrification on the expression level of the microRNAs in human blastocysts (means±SD). * indicates P < 0.05, between fresh and vitrification groups; also, fresh and re-vitrification groups & indicates P < 0.05, between vitrification and re-vitrification groups

Full size image

The expression of miR-16 showed a significant decrease in re-vitrified group versus fresh group (Fig. 2). However, miR-16 expression did not show a significant difference in vitrified group compared to the fresh and in re-vitrified group compared to vitrified (P > 0.05). (Fig. 2).

Expression of ITGβ3 gene as a miR-let7a target gene that is involved in implantation, showed a significant increase in vitrified embryos compared to fresh embryos and re-vitrified embryos compared to that of the fresh ones. However, ITGβ3 gene expression did not show a significant difference in re-vitrified group compared to vitrified group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The Bar graph showing the effects of vitrification and re-vitrification on the expression level of the ITGβ3, BCL2 and BAX in human blastocysts (means±SD). * indicates P < 0.05, between fresh and vitrification groups; also, fresh and re-vitrification groups. & indicates P < 0.05, between vitrification and re-vitrification groups

Full size image

There was significant increase in anti-apoptotic BCL2 expression (Homo sapiens BCL2 apoptosis regulator) as a target gene of miR-16 in vitrified group compared to fresh and in re-vitrified group compared to fresh (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

The expression of BAX as a pro-apoptotic gene showed a significant decrease in re-vitrified group compared to the fresh one (P < 0.05) but there was no significant change in the vitrified group compared to the fresh (P > 0.05) (Fig. 3).

The ratio of BAX/BCL-2 expression was calculated in the fresh (1.11), vitrified (0.44) and re-vitrified groups (0.21). There was significant decrease in BAX/BCL-2 expression ratio in vitrified group compared to the fresh and in re-vitrified group compared to the fresh (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The Bar graph showing the effects of vitrification and re-vitrification on BCL2/BAX expression ratio (means±SD). * indicates P < 0.05, between fresh and vitrification groups; also, fresh and re-vitrification groups. & indicates P < 0.05, between vitrification and re-vitrification groups

Full size image

The TUNEL assay was conducted on human blastocysts to evaluate apoptosis (Fig. 5). There was no significant difference in apoptotic index in vitrification and re-vitrification groups compared to their fresh counterparts (Fig. 6). Also, the average number of total cells and total apoptotic cell in blastocysts of each group is shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 5
figure 5

TUNEL staining in human blastocyst. The nuclei are stained by hoechst (blue color). the apoptotic nuclei are stained by TUNEL (red color). A-C, Apoptosis in fresh human blastocysts. D-F, Apoptosis in vitrified/warmed human blastocysts. G-I, Apoptosis in re-vitrified/re-warmed human blastocysts

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Apoptotic index in human blastocycst following vitrification and re-vitrification (n = 5) (means±SD)

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

The average number of total cells and total apoptotic cell in blastocysts of each group (means±SD)

Full size image

Discussion

The current study evaluated the effect of vitrification and re-vitrification on survival of blastocyst. These results showed vitrification and re-vitrification did not have any effect on re-expansion capability of blastocysts after warming. In agreement with current results, other studies have repeatedly shown that vitrification and re-vitrification do not have any effect on viability of blastocysts and they are capable of progressing to successful pregnancies and healthy live births [5, 20, 21].

Also, we evaluated the effects of vitrification and re-vitrification on alterations of microRNA expressions involved in apoptosis (miR-16), implantation (miR-let7a) and target genes (BCL2, BAX, ITGβ3) in human blastocysts.

MicroRNAs play an important functional role in embryo developmental capabilities such as implantation and differentiation [7, 8]. Recently, many studies have been done on effects of Assisted Reproductive Technology on microRNA expression levels in gametes and embryo. These studies showed that manipulation of embryos or gametes causes alterations in microRNA expression [22,23,24]. In a study by Azizi et al. in 2019 on mouse embryos it was shown that let-7a expression significantly decreased in IVF-driven blastocysts versus in vivo ones [25]. Zhao et al. showed vitrification of mouse blastocyst resulted in significant alterations of microRNA transcriptome, which may affect implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts [17].

Our findings indicated significant decrease of miR-let7a expression and, subsequently, significant increase of ITGβ3 gene expression in vitrified embryos compared to the fresh group. Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease in mir-let7a and an increase of ITGβ3 expression in re-vitrified embryos compared to the fresh ones.

MiR-let7a belongs to Lethal 7 family which plays a critical role in murine and human blastocyst implantation through regulating the expression of integrin Beta3, Vav3 and Dicer genes. Recent reports have indicated that integrin Beta3, Vav3 and Dicer induce trophoblastic activities in order to implant successfully [26]. In 2012 Liu et al. reported expression of miRNA let-7 decreases considerably in embryos ready to implant and on the other hand, decreased expression of miRNA can have an important effect on increasing integrin beta expression, which itself plays a key role in embryo adhesion [11]. Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane glycoproteins which are expressed by the trophectoderm at the implantation stage and mediate embryonic adhesion via attaching to an extracellular mediating ligand [27, 28].

A report by Heydari et al. in [9] described that mir-let7a had a significant decrease while ITGβ3 gene expression was significantly increased in vitrified mouse blastocysts comparing with the fresh group. The present results and the above-mentioned studies indicate that Assisted Reproductive Technology has an effect on microRNA expression, however the accurate impact of this alteration on implantation is not clear.

Numerous investigations have reported higher implantation and pregnancy rates in vitrified embryos comparing with the fresh ones [29, 30]. This improvement seems to be mostly due to better embryo/endometrium synchronization and absence of adverse effects of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) [31] but whether decreased downregulation of miR-let7a and subsequently upregulation of ITGβ3 following vitrification contributes to these clinical outcomes is unknown and requires further research.

Also, effects of re-vitrification on expression of miR-16, BCL2 and BAX were assessed in our study. miR-16 is situated on chromosomal position of 13q14 and is highly conserved in mammalian species which testifies to its paramount value in physiological processes and normal development [32]. Studies have indicated that BCL2 is a target gene of miR-16 and this microRNA induces apoptosis through inhibiting BCL2 [9, 16]. BCL2 protein as a proto-oncogene is involved in intracellular apoptosis regulation and generally plays a crucial role in inhibiting cell apoptosis and early embryo development [33].

In this research, a significant decrease in the expression of miR-16 in vitrified and re-vitrified groups was observed compared to that of fresh. Also, the level of BCL2 expression which is considered as one of miR-16 targets, had significant increase in both vitrified and re-vitrified groups compared to fresh. In this study BAX expression in re-vitrified embryos had a significant decrease compared to fresh ones but we did not observe a significant decrease compared to the vitrified ones. Upregulation of anti-apoptotic BCL2 expression and down-regulation of proapoptotic BAX expression, resulted in a reduction of the BAX/BCL2 ratio in both vitrified and re-vitrified groups compared to the fresh groups.

TUNEL is a method which has been widely used to detect apoptotic DNA fragmentation in individual cells. We used this technique to evaluate apoptotic cells in blastocysts. The apoptotic index obtained from the tunnel assay is 2.36, 3.02 and 3.61 in the control, vitrification and re-vitrification groups alternatively which are small and negligible values. Although there was a slight increase in the apoptotic index in re-vitrification group compared to vitrification group, however this slight increase was not significant and may be due to the small number of samples.

Similar results were also showed in a study by Heydari et al. in 2019 who reported that the vitrification of mouse embryos results in significant decrease of miR-16 expression and increase of Bcl2 [9]. In another study by Turathm et al. [34] it was shown that Bcl2 gains higher expressions in vitrified immature canine oocytes compared to control. Contrarily, Majidi et al. reported that Bcl2 displays a greater decrease in the re-vitrified mouse embryos compared to fresh and expression of BAX gene was up-regulated in the re-vitrified group [6].

Dahli et al. reported interesting results about effect of vitrification on Bcl2 expression in two separate studies. In 2007 they observed significant downregulation of Bcl2 and p53 in mouse zygotes following droplet vitrification method [35]. But in another study (2009), following modified droplet vitrification they reported significant upregulation of these genes in mouse zygotes following vitrification [36].

.It seems different pattern of gene expression observed in our research and other studies may be due to quality and developmental ability of the assessed embryos and also how vitrification and warming of these embryos was done.

In this study we assessed high-quality embryos donated by healthy fertile couples while embryos of infertile couples may respond differently to stress due to their deficiencies such as alteration of gene expression or DNA fragmentation and may end up proceeding to cell death. Yang et al. in [37] reported a relationship between Bcl2 expression and quality of embryos and oocytes. They showed up-regulation of Bcl2 in good-quality bovine embryos and oocytes compared to degenerated embryos. Numerous investigations have reported relationships between differential expression of genes and microRNA in patients with different spermatogenic impairments [38,39,40].

Previous studies have shown cell response to stress depending on the cell type, stress intensity and duration of stress exposure can be an initializer of either survival or cell demise [41, 42]. Increased levels of BCL2 expression is a cell response to stress which acts through inhibiting cytochrome C from the mitochondrion [41]. Therefore, regarding previous reports, it seems high-quality embryos show a better adaptability and resistance toward stress, a response which can include increased expression of anti-apoptotic proteins and genes involved in implantation.

Also, the results in this study showed that the expression of Bcl2 and BAX genes in the re-vitrification group was significantly reduced compared to the vitrification group and the expression of ITGβ3 gene in the re-vitrification group was reduced compared to the vitrification group, however this decrease was not significant. In 2017, Yu et al. reported multiple cycles of freeze–thawing reduced RNA integrity in lung cancer tissues [43]. In another study in 2021, Kellman et al. showed that multiple freeze-thaw reduced the stability of poly A sequences in RNA [44] . The results of this study also showed a decrease in RNA following re-vitrification compared to vitrification group, which can indicate the effect of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on the RNA integrity.

It is important to be noted that the mentioned results in this section should be interpreted with caution and a number of limitations must be considered too as following:

  1. 1-

    Small number of samples examined due to difficult access to human blastocysts donated by fertile couples.

  2. 2-

    In this study the embryos were assessed individually, therefor due to the small volume of extracted RNA from any blastocyst, it was not possible to evaluate the expression of further

  3. 3-

    Evaluation of high-quality embryos donated by healthy fertile couples while embryos of infertile couples may respond differently.

Conclusion

Post-cryopreservation survival of human blastocysts is potentially associated with the miR-16 and miR-let-7a which are related to regulation of implantation and apoptosis processes, respectively. The results of this study showed that vitirification and re-vitirification did not have a negative effect on the expression of genes involved in implantation and apoptosis, which seems to be due to the adaptability to stressful conditions of quality embryos obtained from healthy and fertile couples. On the other hand, gene expression in the re-vitirification group decreased compared to the vitirification group, which may indicate the effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on RNA integrity. However, the exact effect of re-vitirification on RNA integrity as well as gene expression requires further studies. Also, further clinical investigations are still required to assess responses of embryos belonging to sub-fertile/infertile couples that they may have less resistance potential to stressful situations.

Availability of data and materials

We declare that the data availability which support the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author in upon a reasonable request.

References

  1. Donnez J, Kim SS. Principles and practice of fertility preservation. 1st ed. London: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumasako Y, Otsu E, Utsunomiya T, Araki Y. The efficacy of the transfer of twice frozen-thawed embryos with the vitrification method. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(2):383–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagy ZP, Varghese AC, Agarwal A. Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization: Advanced Methods and Novel Devices. 1st ed. New york: Springer; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Farhat M, Zentner B-S, Lossos F, Bdolah Y, Holtzer H, Hurwitz A. Successful pregnancy following replacement of embryos previously refrozen at blastocyst stage: case report. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(2):337–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fathi R, Valojerdi MR, Yazdi PE, Ebrahimi B, Alipour H, Hassani F. Development of 4-cell mouse embryos after re-vitrification. Cryobiology. 2012;64(1):23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Majidi Gharenaz N, Movahedin M, Mazaheri Z, Beiranvand SP. Alternation of apoptotic and implanting genes expression of mouse embryos after re-vitrification. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(8):511–518. Nov 26 received, May 24 revised, June 01 accepted

  7. Liang J, Wang S, Wang Z. Role of microRNAs in embryo implantation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salas-Huetos A, James ER, Aston KI, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT, Yeste M. The expression of miRNAs in human ovaries, oocytes, extracellular vesicles, and early embryos: a systematic review. Cells. 2019;8(12):1564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Heidari F, Hosseini S, Yeganeh SM, Salehi M. Expression of miR-let-7a, miR-15a, miR-16-1, and their target genes in fresh and vitrified embryos and its surrounding culture media for noninvasive embryo assessment. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(12):19691–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu W, Niu Z, Li Q, Pang RT, Chiu PC, Yeung WSB. Micro RNA and embryo implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75(3):263–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu W-M, Pang RT, Cheong AW, Ng EH, Lao K, Lee K-F, et al. Involvement of microRNA lethal-7a in the regulation of embryo implantation in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aplin JD, Ruane PT. Embryo–epithelium interactions during implantation at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(1):15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Betts DH, Madan P. Permanent embryo arrest: molecular and cellular concepts. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(8):445–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, Behr B, De Jonge CJ, Baer TM, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(10):1115–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pekarsky Y, Balatti V, Croce CM. BCL2 and miR-15/16: from gene discovery to treatment. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(1):21–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Shimizu M, et al. miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(39):13944–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao X, Hao H, Du W, Zhu H. Effect of vitrification on the microRNA transcriptome in mouse blastocysts. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Two Volume Set. 5th ed. New york: CRC Press; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Zuccotti M, Boiani M, Ponce R, Guizzardi S, Scandroglio R, Garagna S, et al. Mouse Xist expression begins at zygotic genome activation and is timed by a zygotic clock. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;61(1):14–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlenker T, McCormick S, Smith R, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Double biopsy, not double vitrification, leads to decreased probability of establishing and sustaining a viable clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):e153–e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan S, Lee C, Lim Y, Lim M, Chan C. Repeated vitrification and warming procedures has no detrimental effect on blastocyst survival and pregnancy outcome. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;39:e39–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Yang X, Liu F, Song Y, Liu Y. Evaluation of differentially expressed microRNAs in vitrified oocytes by next generation sequencing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2019;112:134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Movahed E, Soleimani M, Hosseini S, Akbari Sene A, Salehi M. Aberrant expression of miR-29a/29b and methylation level of mouse embryos after in vitro fertilization and vitrification at two-cell stage. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(10):18942–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang N, Li CY, Zhu HB, Hao HS, Wang HY, Yan CL, et al. Effect of vitrification on the mRNA transcriptome of bovine oocytes. Reprod Domest Anim. 2017;52(4):531–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Azizi E, Ghaffari Novin M, Naji M, Amidi F, Shams MZ. Does in vitro fertilization affect the expression of miRNAs and their biogenesis pathway in preimplantation mouse embryos? Birth Defects Res. 2020;112(1):62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheong W-y. MicroRNA let-7a regulates integrin beta-3, vav3, and dicer to modulate trophoblast activities and hence embryo implantation. HKU Theses Online (HKUTO). 2013.

  27. Arnaout MA, Goodman SL, Xiong J-P. Structure and mechanics of integrin-based cell adhesion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19(5):495–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukuda M, Sugihara K. Cell adhesion molecules in human embryo implantation. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2012;64(3):247–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aflatoonian A, Maybodi MAK, Aflatoonian N, Tabibnejad N, Amir-Arjmand MH, Soleimani M, et al. Perinatal outcome in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in ART cycles. Int J Reprod BioMed. 2016;14(3):167.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Groenewoud ER, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. Cryo-thawed embryo transfer: natural versus artificial cycle. A non-inferiority trial. (ANTARCTICA trial). BMC Womens Health. 2012;12(1):27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, Vollenhoven BJ, Lutjen PJ, Osianlis T, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(6):808–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yue J, Tigyi G. Conservation of miR-15a/16-1 and miR-15b/16-2 clusters. Mamm Genome. 2010;21(1–2):88–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boumela I, Guillemin Y, Guérin J, Aouacheria A. The Bcl-2 family pathway in gametes and preimplantation embryos. Gynécol Obstét Fertil. 2009;37(9):720–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Turathum B, Saikhun K, Sangsuwan P, Kitiyanant Y. Effects of vitrification on nuclear maturation, ultrastructural changes and gene expression of canine oocytes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8(1):70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dhali A, Anchamparuthy V, Butler S, Pearson R, Mullarky I, Gwazdauskas F. Gene expression and development of mouse zygotes following droplet vitrification. Theriogenology. 2007;68(9):1292–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dhali A, Anchamparuthy V, Butler S, Pearson R, Mullarky I, Gwazdauskas F. Effect of droplet vitrification on development competence, actin cytoskeletal integrity and gene expression in in vitro cultured mouse embryos. Theriogenology. 2009;71(9):1408–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang MY, Rajamahendran R. Expression of Bcl-2 and Bax proteins in relation to quality of bovine oocytes and embryos produced in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002;70(3–4):159–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abu-Halima M, Hammadeh M, Schmitt J, Leidinger P, Keller A, Meese E, et al. Altered microRNA expression profiles of human spermatozoa in patients with different spermatogenic impairments. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):1249–55 e16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lian J, Zhang X, Tian H, Liang N, Wang Y, Liang C, et al. Altered microRNA expression in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Taheri H, Hosseini S, Salehi M. The relationship between sperm DNA fragmentation and differential expression of human sperm pro-apoptotic miR-15a/16 and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 gene. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2019;22(10):42–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fulda S, Gorman AM, Hori O, Samali A. Cellular stress responses: cell survival and cell death. Int J Cell Biol. 2010;2010:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Poljšak B, Milisav I. Clinical implications of cellular stress responses. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2012;12(2):122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu K, Xing J, Zhang J, Zhao R, Zhang Y, Zhao L. Effect of multiple cycles of freeze–thawing on the RNA quality of lung cancer tissues. Cell Tissue Bank. 2017;18(3):433–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kellman BP, Baghdassarian HM, Pramparo T, Shamie I, Gazestani V, Begzati A, et al. Multiple freeze-thaw cycles lead to a loss of consistency in poly (a)-enriched RNA sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran and all the experiments have been conducted in Molecular and Cellular Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The Authors greatly appreciate Gandhi Infertility Center, Tehran, Iran for providing all support.

Funding

This work was supported by the Medical Sciences Faculty of Tarbiat Modarres University of Tehran. [grant number: 76185, 2018/04/22].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Maryam Daneshvar & Mansoureh Movahedin

  2. Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Salehi

  3. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Mehrdad Noruzinia

Authors
  1. Maryam Daneshvar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mansoureh Movahedin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Salehi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehrdad Noruzinia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M. Daneshvar and M. Movahhedin contributed to the conception and design of the work and acquisition, performed all the experiments, analysis and interpretation of the data. M. Salehi provided laboratory facilities and participated in conducting the experiments as an adviser. M. Noruzinia participated in Genetic analyzing of the results. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansoureh Movahedin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors underwrite and undertake that the Blastocyst collection was done regarding ethical codes and approval of Medical Ethics Committee of Tarbiat Modares University (IR.MODARES.REC.1397.053).

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daneshvar, M., Movahedin, M., Salehi, M. et al. Alterations of miR-16, miR-let-7a and their target genes expression in human blastocysts following vitrification and re-vitrification. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 19, 155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00842-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00842-w

Keywords

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us