Skip to main content

Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on male fertility



Male infertility is a widespread condition among couples. In about 50% of cases, couple infertility is attributable to the male partner, mainly due to a failure in spermatogenesis. In recent times, the crucial role that modifiable lifestyle factors play in the development of infertility have generated a growing interest in this field of study, i.e. aging, psychological stress, nutrition, physical activity, caffeine, high scrotal temperature, hot water, mobile telephone use. Several studies have investigated associations between semen quality and the presence of lifestyle stressors i.e. occupational, life events (war, earthquake, etc.) or couple infertility; overall, these studies provide evidence that semen quality is impaired by psychological stress. In this review, we will discuss the impact of quality of life (modifiable lifestyle factors) and psychological stress on male fertility. In addition, the role that increased scrotal temperature along with inappropriate nutritional and physical exercise attitudes exert on male fertility will be presented.


The decline of male fertility, particularly associated with advancing age, incorrect lifestyles and environmental factors plays an important role on natality, and its consequences on the future on human population makes this an important public health issue in this century. Thus, modification of lifestyle through a structured program of educational, environmental, nutritional/physical exercise and psychological support, combined with the use of nutraceutical antioxidants can prevent infertility and therefore, may help couples to obtain better quality of life and improved possibility to conceive spontaneously or optimize their chances of conception.


In industrialized nations, decreasing the number of people affected by infertility has become a top priority for many health organizations. In Europe, several studies have suggested a possible decline in fecundity of the population [1]. The net effect has been a 7% decrease in fecundability, as suggested by several studies [2]. If the trend observed over 15 years will be extended to 45 years, the reduction in fecundability would be doubled and finally could increase to the extreme hypothesis of a 50% reduction [3]. Infertility affects both men and women. In 50% of involuntarily childless couples, a male-infertility-associated factor is found together with abnormal semen parameters. A fertile partner may compensate for the fertility problem of the man and thus infertility usually manifests itself if both partners have reduced fertility [4].

Lifestyle factors can be modified to enhance overall wellbeing and they are ultimately under one’s own control. Reproductive health can be affected positively or negatively by multiple factors, i.e. age of paternity, nutrients, physical exercise, obesity, caffeine, scrotal temperature, clothing, hot water, mobile telephones [5] that can thus impact the quality of life of sperm parameters and DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) [6]. Also, the altered balance between antioxidant system [7] and oxidative stress, may determine poor fertilization/ embryonic development, pregnancy loss, birth defects and childhood cancer [8,9,10]. In this review we will present evidence that modification of lifestyle through a structured program of educational, environmental, nutritional/physical exercise and psychological support, combined with the use of nutraceutical antioxidants can prevent infertility and therefore, may help couples to obtain better quality of life and improved possibility to conceive spontaneously or optimize their chances of conception.

Role of stress on male fertility

Stress is a prominent part of any society and infertility itself is stressful, due to social pressures, testing, diagnosis, treatments, failures, unfulfilled desires and even economic costs with which it is associated [11]. Semen parameters may be potentially linked to stress, whose presence may reduce luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone pulsing, thus reducing in turn spermatogenesis and sperm quality [12, 13].

Pre-clinical data have shown that acute stress might impair testicular function; testicular tissue from stressed rats shows higher levels of cortisol displayed apoptosis of both germ cells and Leydig cells [14, 15]. By contrast, the net effects of stress might be determined by chronic as demonstrated by the presence of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) in Leydig, [16], Sertoli [17] and germs cells [15]; permanently high levels of glucocorticoid are believed to induce apoptosis of all cell types [15,16,17]. The Leydig cell is the primary target of glucocorticoid regulation in the testes. Today, our current understanding of glucocorticoid signaling in the context of reproductive physiology is limited. In humans, stress results in a variety of neuroendocrine, immune and behavioral responses. Recently, new evidence supporting the GR response to glucorticoid in the regulation of Sertoli and Leydig cell’s function has been suggested for a single nucleotide NR3C1 polymorphisms (BcII [rs41423247] [18]. Thus, this variant gene (in an over-dominant manner with heterozygotes) is strongly associated with better sperm motility and a better testicular function [18].

In humans, polymorphism of the GR could suggest a response variability to stress [19]. An isolated stress such as a job, life events, and even social strain or two simultaneous stressful life events may have a significant negative impact on sperm quality [11]. The perceived stress of providing a semen sample was reported to be negatively linked to overall semen quality with a 39% decrease in sperm concentration, 48% decrease in motility, and worse overall semen parameters on the day of oocyte retrieval, although there was no change in either volume or morphology [20, 21]. Futhermore, environmental disasters, war or “stressful life events” are major determinants that do not allow to quantify their impact on fertility, thus determining underestimation of the actual stress burden. A high stress level may occur owing to a continuous high stress in daily life without occurrence of specific stressful exposures. This might explain the uncertain results, and a study setup based on stress due to environmental disasters or war should be preferably accompanied by an assessment of perceived stress [12, 22,23,24,25,26].

Many studies show that men undergoing infertility treatment [27,28,29] or men from the general population [30] have a decline in semen parameters during infertility treatment, but it is difficult to distinguish whether stress is a cause or a consequence of decreased semen quality in such studies. Stress can increase after diagnosis of male infertility, follow-up appointments, and failed in vitro fertilization treatments [11]. Men undergoing infertility treatment met the criteria for having an anxiety disorder or depression, the latter being more common [12]. Coping with various lifestyles may also affect fertility. It was reported that actively coping with stress, such as being assertive or confrontational, may negatively impact on fertility, by increasing adrenergic activation, leading to more vasoconstriction in the testes [31]. This vasoconstriction results in a lower testosterone level and decreased spermatogenesis. While men are not often thought to report their anxiety or sexual stress, the link between anxiety and sexual stress was surprisingly strong [32]. Two studies investigating self-reported “daily-life-stress” in men from the general population, while controlling for relevant confounders, have shown controversial results on semen parameters. One study detected linear negative associations between perceived stress and sperm motility, sperm concentration, and percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa [33]. The other study did not find any association between stress and semen parameters, but found that fecundability decreased with increasing stress score in men with low semen quality [34]. Thus, a negative association between self-reported stress and semen quality reported in many studies represents a public health concern (Table 1). Psychological stress might be a modifiable or reversible factor, which is important in a clinical setting [5]. Future studies should objectively assess the impact of stress and prospectively evaluate whether timely counseling aimed at lowering stress levels may restore semen quality, and attempt to clarify the underlying biological mechanisms by which stress affects semen quality.

Table 1 Effects of psychological stress on semen parameters: clinical studies

Quality of life and male fertility

Currently, increased life expectancy, advanced age of marriage, various socio-economic factors and an overall change in role of women in society has led couples to start their family at a later age. The increased accessibility to assisted reproductive techniques (ART) has increased the chance of older parents with poor pregnancy outcomes to conceive children, hence, increasing the average paternal age at first childbirth. Increased paternal age is a major determinant fo testicular function [35, 36], reproductive hormones [37], sperm parameters [38, 39], sperm DNA integrity [40], telomere length [41], de novo mutation rate [42], chromosomal structure [43] and epigenetic factors [44, 45]. These changes negatively affect fertility and reproductive outcomes in older couples, contributing to higher incidences of congenital birth defects [46] and fetal deaths [47]. Increasing male age has also been shown to be associated with numerous disorders like achondroplasia [48], autism [49], schizophrenia and bipolar disorders [45]. Male aging results in the loss of antioxidant activity and elevated levels of ROS [50]. This imbalance between ROS and antioxidants causes oxidative stress and is well documented in the male reproductive tract [51, 52] and in the spermatozoa of aging rodents [53]. If not maintained within normal physiological levels, ROS can damage cellular macromolecules, inducing stress signaling and, at high levels, cell death [54]. A recent study confirmed that aging reduces fertility and the numbers of Sertoli and germ cells in mice with complete absence of either catalase (CAT-null (Cat−/−) or superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1-null (Sod−/−) [55]. Thus, suggesting that these enzymes appear critical to the maintenance of germ cell quality with aging.

In humans, although spermatozoa are continuously produced with advanced paternal age, there is a growing body of evidence indicating that advanced paternal age is associated with negative impact on the quality of male germ cells [56], the number of Sertoli cells [57] and the number of Leydig cells [58]. A negative association between increasing paternal age and testicular volume was noted by several studies [35, 59]. In a study it was found that compared to the age group 18–40 years, men aged > 75 years had 31% smaller mean testicular volume [59]. In addition, some authors reported the thickening of basal membrane of seminiferous tubules with age [35] as well as disturbances in blood supply in senile testes have been associated with negative changes in spermiogenesis and thickness of basement membrane [60].

Male aging is characterized by different changes in the endocrine function. Hormonal changes are characterized mainly by a reduction of the biosynthesis of testicular inhibin B by Sertoli cells with increased secretion of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) [61]. Leydig cells are responsible for testosterone production. The number of Leydig cells tends to reduce with increasing paternal age [58]. The average total number of Leydig cell nuclei decreases by half in age group of 50–76 years compared to age group of 20–48 years [58]. Wu et al. reported that age-affected testicular atrophy is a result of Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Testicular Axis alterations that disturb the functions of various reproductive hormones [62].

In a study where semen values of men above 45 years of age were analyzed, four measured parameters (semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm motility, and sperm morphology) and one derived parameter (total sperm count) were calculated according to the age range, and these values were compared to the reference values of the World Health Organization [63]. After the age of 45, semen volume gradually decreases due to functional decline of accessory glands [63]. In addition, sperm morphology is also affected with aging and the percentage of sperms with normal morphology begins to decrease after the age of 40 [64]. The age of a man is directly related to increase of sperm DNA fragmentation, due to elevation of oxidatixe stress [65]. Oxidative stress due to increased production of ROS or reduced antioxidant reserves, is responsible for a majority of DNA fragmentations (almost 80%) occurring during infections, inflammation or in cases of various clinical diagnosis of male infertility [66]. Recently, a meta-analysis confirmed that paternal aging led to a decrease in sperm parameters except for sperm concentration; however, impaired DNA fragmentation and reduced progressive motility were suggested as diagnostic parameters to be considered during fertility treatment of older men [67].

Also, as already noted, advanced paternal age increases sperm DNA fragmentation and may negatively affect the IVF/ICSI success rates [68, 69]. Despite increasing evidence of positive correlation between sperm DNA fragmentation and reduced male fertility, current guidelines do not support the routine use of sperm DNA integrity assessment in clinical practice [70]. Thus, it is clear that advanced paternal age should be considered as a risk factor for possible genetic disorders of newborns and we recommend to use caution in counselling couples with advanced age wanting to conceive with ART because of this evidence.


A new emerging role in the male infertile management is the use of antioxidants [71]. They are molecules such as albumin, ceruloplasmin, and ferritin; and an array of small molecules, including ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, β-carotene, reduced glutathione, uric acid, and bilirubin or enzymes superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase [71]. They help to remove ROS excess in the seminal ejaculate and assist in the conversion of ROS to compounds that are less detrimental to cells [71]. If there is abundancy of ROS than the local antioxidants can remove, it results in increased oxidative stress thus impairing sperm protein, lipid and DNA damage and sperm dysfunction [71]. The ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is a known antioxidant present in the testes with the precise role of protecting the latter from the oxidative damage [72]. It also contributes to the support of spermatogenesis, at least in part through its capacity to maintain this antioxidant in an active state [72]. Vitamin C is itself maintained in a reduced state by a GSH-dependent dehydroascorbate reductase, which is abundant in the testes [72]. An emerging role is attributed to myo-inositol, a precursor of the second messenger Ins (1,4,5) P3 [73, 74]. It modulates specific protein phosphorylation process and intracellular Ca++ concentration through one sperm-specific Ca++ − permeable channel (CatSper) in the plasma membrane of the flagellar principal piece, hence it may be beneficial to sperm motility [75,76,77,78,79]. Another scavenger, N-Acetyl cysteine (NAC), is an amino acid that may exhibit antioxidant properties after being converted into cysteine, which is a precursor of glutathione [80]. In vitro studies have demonstrated a beneficial role for NAC on germ cell survival [81] through reduction of ROS levels, thus improving sperm motility [82]. However, most clinical studies using any antioxidant produced controversial results. A double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized study investigated the effect of a log-term administration of selenium and N-acetyl-cysteine on 468 infertile men with idiopathic oligo-asthenoteratospermia suggesting a beneficial effect [83]. Despite a positive association between vitamin D levels and semen quality (sperm motility), there is no proof-of-fact that its administration is able to improve sperm parameters [84]. A Cochrane meta-analysis of 33 trials, suggested that men who use oral antioxidants had a slightly significant increase in live birth rate when compared to controls [85]. Subfertile males using antioxidants, may improve live birth rates for couples attending fertility clinics [85]. Currently, we can conclude that there is no indication neither for screening infertile patients for ROS generation or seminal oxidative stress or treating them with specific antioxidants in the clinical setting once diagnostic workup is concluded in favour of a specific inflammatory etiology.

Nutritional factors

Nutritional factors are known to be critical determinants of normal reproductive function in both sexes [86]. A combination of reduced physical exercise, changes in dietary composition and increased energy intake have contributed to a growing worldwide epidemic in obesity [87, 88] and diabetes [89], with serious impacts on several aspects of health, including reproductive system health [88, 90]. Moreover, there is increasing evidence indicating a direct relationship between incorrect nutritional attitudes in decreased sperm quality.

Recent evidences from both animal and human studies indicate that high fat diets result in impaired reproduction, by affecting molecular and physical structure of sperm as well as the health of the developing fetus and subsequent offspring [90, 91]. The exposure to a high fat diet during that period leads to long-term changes in the reproductive system and metabolism of male rats, so it may implicate reproductive and metabolic programming mechanisms [92]: a reduction in seminiferous epithelium height and seminiferous tubular diameter [93], reduced sperm concentration, viability, motility and DNA integrity [94]. On the other hand, adult male Wistar rat offspring born to obese mothers after a long term of regular voluntary physical activity and diet leads to a reduction of adipose tissue and an improved sperm quality and fertility [95]. These beneficial effects were associated to decreased testicular oxidative stress biomarkers and increased sperm antioxidant activity found in exercised animals [95]. Rato et al. reported that testicular physiology is sensitive to alterations of whole-body metabolism and that testicular metabolism can be disturbed by high-energy diet intake, such as trans fatty acids and saturated fats and obesity [96]; other authors suggested that chronic inflammation can provoke an impairment of sperm concentration and motility [97].

Emerging data suggest the role of an individualized diet in order to improve semen parameters. It should be characterized by high intakes of fruits and vegetables [98, 99], legumes [98] and fish [100,101,102], possibly as sources of antioxidants and polyunsaturated fatty acids (among which omega-3) and negatively associated with diets including meats (processed meat in particular) and full-fat dairy products that are sources of saturated fats [103]. In general, fruit and vegetable intake showed a consistently positive association with better motility and morphology [98, 99]. According to the Mediterranean diet score, a high adherence to this diet is strongly associated to better sperm parameter i.e. count, motility and morphology [104], and a lower DNA fragmentation index [105] than those people with lower adherence. By contrast it is known that the frequent use of red meat is negatively associated with sperm parameters [106].

The abuse of high caffeine-content energy drinks has increased in recent years. 28% of children and 31% of adolescents are reported to be regular consumers and this has been hypothesized to influence semen parameters [107]. As suggested by animal studies [108, 109], caffeine easily crosses biologic membranes and is rapidly distributed throughout the body and has been found in saliva, breast milk, the embryo and the fetal rat testis [110]. In humans, prenatal caffeine exposure impairs male gonadal development and thus later gonadal function [111]. However, the mechanism behind the possible harmful effect of caffeine is not well clarified. Coffee consumption has been hypothesized to influence not only semen parameters, but also sperm DNA integrity. Caffeine intake, possibly though sperm DNA damage, may negatively affect the male reproductive function [112, 113]. However, we can conclude that there is no clear association between caffeine and fertility indexes, so this relationship remains unclear and, in some ways, contrasting. It is our opinion that all the quoted observational studies regarding these nutritional factors have proven associations but not causations, the associations need to be confirmed with larger prospective cohort studies and especially with well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Physical exercise

The beneficial effects of a correct physical exercise on cardio-metabolic parameters are well known [114,115,116]. Animal studies support the evidence that impaired sperm quality and fertility potential in rat offspring from obese dams, can be ameliorated by exercise performed during adulthood [95]. In mice, a low intensity swimming training improves reproductive system without affecting adiposity in obese animals, which suggests that adiposity itself is not the sole determinant in the impaired sperm function [90]. So, animals exposed to high fat diet and physical exercise, show an attenuation of fat visceral deposits, which can be associated with protection of reproductive system [117]. By contrast, there are conflicting data on the effect of physical activity (PA) on male fertility in humans. Observational studies conducted on general populations and student populations do not provide evidence of any improvement of semen parameters by PA [118]. Initial studies demonstrated that during continuous strenuous exercise, semen parameters and testicular function can be affected negatively by testicular heating [119], oxidative stress (ROS formation) [120], DNA fragmentation [121] and gonadotropin suppression [122].

Physically active subjects have been reported to have higher numbers of motile spermatozoa with normal morphology than sedentary controls [123, 124] and an improvement of sperm parameters has been found after reducing the exposure time of tv-watching [125]. Recent studies suggest that moderate-intensity continuous training may be more advantageous on the oxidant/antioxidant markers in seminal plasma than high-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training [126]. Finally, it is worth remembering that many evidences support the fact that continuous bicycling exerts a negative correlation with both total motile sperm counts and sperm concentration because of its influence on scrotal temperature [127]. We can conclude that any kind of extreme or agonistic physical activity may expose subjects to an increased risk of worsening in the reproductive function; the withdrawal of these activities as well as the recommendation of a supervised physical activity may improve fertility especially in patients with concomitant comorbidities i.e. diabetes/obesity.


The exposure of testes to an increase of temperature can impair fertility through the alteration of sperm parameters (number, motility and morphology) and the damage of sperm membrane integrity [128,129,130,131]. The temperature of the scrotal sac reflects testicular temperature and its thermoregulation is fundamental defensive mechanisms [132]. Higher temperatures promote increased ROS generartion with subsequent damage on the sperm plasma membrane and determinate DNA fragmentation of both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, conducing to cell damage and apoptosis [133]. Animal studies support the concept that elevated testicular temperature by 1–1.5 °C resulted in reduction of the testes size, lower sperm production, abnormal forms [134] and lower motility [135,136,137]. Heat stress can affects testes especially cells with high mitotic rate, like mature spermatozoa spermatocytes and spermatids [130] According to studies conducted on mice, hyperthermia affects sperm cells determining DNA damage and apoptosis by intrinsic or extrinsic pathway [138, 139]. The consequence is a poor fertility capacity in vivo and in vitro.

Clinical studies suggest that slight variations of the testicular temperature may bring to alterations of spermatogenesis according to the delicate temperature sensitivity of testicular DNA synthesis, with temperature maximal sensitivity at 31 °C, whereas for RNA and protein synthesis the maximal sensitivity is 37–40 °C [132]. An increase of 1 °C is correlated to a 14% drop in the spermatogenesis with poorer sperm production [132]. Studies have found that high temperature exposure of sperm led to increase in apoptosis [132]. Accordingly, also portable computers seem to have thermal and non-thermal effects on male fertility, but data in literature are poor and inconclusive [140]. Non -thermal effects are attributed to radiofrequency exposure that can cause a decrease in sperm motility and morphology [141], while thermal effects are more possibly causing detrimental effects. To this end, there is increasing concern that the use of mobile phones, a source of low-level radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF), may be associated with decreased semen quality [142]. There are also some experimental evidences in rats that exposures to mobile phone RF-EMF may lead to histological changes to the testes, disrupted spermatogenesis, and increases in rectal temperature, but, again, the results are also conflicting [143, 144]. In laptop users, both thermal and non-thermal mechanisms have been similarly involved [145]. The state of the art on this topic is limited and is in progress. Prolonged sitting in the car is another risk factor for the rise of testicular temperature, that increases of about 2 °C after 2 h of sitting [146]. Finally, we want to highlight that the type of clothing a man chooses to wear, may have effects on reproductive health i.e. tight fitting underwear and pants showed a relative risk of 2.5 of having impaired semen quality [147]. Thus, it has been suggested that tight fitting versus loose fitting underwear is detrimental on sperm parameters. In accordance, also hot baths, jacuzzis, or saunas may also worsen fertility parameters [148]. A new chance to improve sperm parameters could be scrotal cooling. A randomized controlled trial on scrotal cooling using a hydrogel pad is in the initial recruitment phase [149]. Systematic review aimed to demonstrate beneficial effect of scrotal cooling on male fertility failed to demonstrate real efficacy in pregnancy rates [150]. We can conclude that increased temperature of the scrotal sac may represent an increased risk factor for all men in reproductive age; we recommend that any man seeking fertility is aware of such risk and also recommend the prevention of such risk factor in young, not-father men who are exposed.


The crucial role that modifiable lifestyle factors play in the development of male infertility has generated a growing interest in this field (Fig. 1). There are associations between psychological attitudes and infertility, but at present it is hard to establish a cause-effect relationship. While stress (physical, emotional, biological, etc) can reduce the potential of male fertility, there is no general consensus on how to measure it objectively. We feel confortable in recommending a special consideration for both partners’age, to thoroughly increase the odds of having a successful pregnancy and to avoid the risk for possible genetic disorders of newborns. We recommend using caution in counselling couples with advanced age wanting to conceive with ART because of this evidence; they should be timely reassured in order to reduce the exposure to stressors. A number of studies have confirmed a beneficial effect for antioxidants in reversing oxidative stress-induced sperm dysfunction specifically in patients with idiopathic male infertility. Their use should be thought of, but not before a diagnostic workup because a robust evidence on this topic is an arduous process. Inappropriate eating behaviors i.e. consuming high fat diet and sedentary lifestyle have been investigated by pre-clinical and clinical studies, so they seemed to worsen sperm parameters. Appropriate nutrients and eventual weight loss may positively influence male fertility. Indeed, it is a fact that obese and overweight men are also predisposed to develop hormonal dysfunctions that may impair their infertility. Up to now, data about choosing supplements or food groups are available only from cross-sectional or case-control studies and no conclusive data about them, i.e. caffeine, are available. PA may positively influence male fertility. A supervised PA administered by a specialist is recommended in any infertile subject with concomitant comorbidities i.e. diabetes/obesity, in order to attain an improvement of fertility, while exercising heavily should be avoided. Today, even if there are suggestive data on the possible influence of other factors such as the type of underwear or clothing or mobile phones use or hot water, little is known about the actual evidence, linking cessation of exposure of lifestyle modifiable factors with resumption of fertility. An access to an andrologist should be encouraged in order to obtain lifestyle recommendations combined with the possible use of nutraceutical antioxidants. The correction of inappropriate lifestyles could improve the degree of DNA fragmentation (even if these latter tests are not recommended in the routine screening) and facilitate the prevision of better quality of life to couples attempting to improve fertility chances of success and minimizing the need for costly and invasive infertility treatment.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of different effect of incorrect lifestyle factors on male fertility

It is our opinion that all the quoted observational studies regarding these nutritional factors may prove associations but not causations. Properly-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to conferm these correlations. Also, the effects of reducing/removing the exposition is not applicable to human studies for ethical reasons.


  1. 1.

    Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keuding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of sperm during past 50 years. Br Med J. 1992;305:609–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Slama R, Kold-Jensen T, Scheike T, Ducot B, Spira A, Keiding N. How would a decline in sperm concentration over time influence the fertility: a comparative perspective? Epidemiology. 2004;15:458–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hoorens S, Gallo F, Cave JAK, Grant JC. Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2471–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:231–45.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gameiro S, Boivin J, Dancet E, Emery M, Thorn P, Van den Broeck U, et al. Qualitative research in the ESHRE Guideline ‘Routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction - a guide for staff Guideline Development Group of the ESHRE Guideline on Psychosocial Care in Infertility and Medically Assisted Reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1928–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cho CL, Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC. Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: concise practice recommendations. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S366–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yousefniapasha Y, Jorsaraei G, Gholinezhadchari M, Mahjoub S, Hajiahmadi M, Farsi M. Nitric oxide levels and total antioxidant capacity in the seminal plasma of infertile smoking men. Cell Journal. 2015;17:129–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    De Iuliis GN, Wingate JK, Koppers AJ, McLaughlin EA, Aitken RJ. Definitive evidence for the nonmitochondrial production of superoxide anion by human spermatozoa. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2006;91:1968–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Aitken RJ, Baker MA, De Iuliis GN, Nixon B. New insights into sperm physiology and pathology. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010;198:99–115.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Agarwal A, Virk G, Ong C, du Plessis SS. Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. W J Men’s Health. 2014;32:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Anderson K, Niesenblat V, Norman R. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment. A review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:8–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gollenberg AL, Liu F, Brazil C, Drobnis EZ, Guzick D, Overstreet JW, et al. Semen quality in fertile men in relation to psychosocial stress. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1104–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Corona G, Giagulli VA, Maseroli E, Vignozzi L, Aversa A, Zitzmann M, Saad F, Mannucci E, Maggi M. Testosterone supplementation and body composition: results from a meta-analysis study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174:R99–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chen Y, Wang Q, Wang FF, Gao HB, Zhang P. Stress induces glucocorticoid-mediated apoptosis of rat Leydig cells in vivo. Stress. 2012;15:74–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yazawa H, Sasagawa I, Nakada T. Apoptosis of testicular germ cells induced by exogenous glucocorticoid in rats. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1917–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Maeda N, Tahata S, Yagi T, Tanaka E, Masu K, Sato M, et al. Assessment of testicular corticosterone biosynthesis in adult male rats. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117795.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hazra R, Upton D, Jimenez M, Desai R, Handelsman DJ, Allan CM. In vivo actions of the Sertoli cell glucocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology. 2014;155:1120–30.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nordkap L, Almstrup K, Nielsen JE, Bang AK, Priskorn L, Krause M, et al. Possible involvement of the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) and selected NR3C1 gene variants in regulation of human testicular function. Andrology. 2017;5:1105–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Panek M, Pietras T, Fabijan A, Zioło J, Wieteska Ł, Małachowska B, et al. The NR3C1 Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene Polymorphisms May Modulate the TGF-beta mRNA Expression in Asthma Patients. Inflammation. 2015;38:1479–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE, Jacobs GA. In: Alto P, editor. STAI: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ragni G, Caccamo A. Negative effect of stress of in vitro fertilization program on quality of semen. Acta Eur Fertil. 1992;23:21–3.

  22. 22.

    Abu-Musa AA, Nassar AH, Hannoun AB, Usta IM. Effect of the Lebanese civil war on sperm parameters. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1579–82.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Eskiocak S, Gozen AS, Yapar SB, Tavas F, Kilic AS, Eskiocak M. Glutathione and free sulphydryl content of seminal plasma in healthy medical students during and after exam stress. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2595–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Shimizu T, Yomura W, Shimizu S. Kobe earthquake and reduced sperm motility. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1244–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fenster L, Katz DF, Wyrobek AJ, Pieper C, Rempel DM, Oman D, et al. Effects of psychological stress on human semen quality. J Androl. 1997;18:194.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Giblin PT, Poland ML, Moghissi KS, Ager JW, Olson JM. Effects of stress and characteristic adaptability on semen quality in healthy men. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:127–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bhongade MB, Prasad S, Jiloha RC, Ray PC, Mohapatra S, Koner BC. Effect of psychological stress on fertility hormones and seminal quality in male partners of infertile couples. Andrologia. 2015;47:336–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vellani E, Colasante A, Mamazza L, Minasi MG, Greco E, Bevilacqua A. Association of state and trait anxiety to semen quality of in vitro fertilization patients: a controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1565–72.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gurhan N, Akyuz A, Atici D, Kisa S. Association of depression and anxiety with oocyte and sperm numbers and pregnancy outcomes during in vitro fertilization treatment. Psychol Rep. 2009;104:796–806.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nordkap L, Jensen TK, Hansen ÅM, Lassen TH, Bang AK, Joensen UN, et al. Psychological stress and testicular function: a cross-sectional study of 1,215 Danish men. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:174–87.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pook M, Tuschen-Caffier B, Kubek J, Schill W, Krause W. Personality, coping and sperm count. Andrologia. 2005;37:29–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zorn B, Auger J, Velikonja V, Kolbezen M, Meden-Vrtovec H. Psychological factors in male partners of infertile couples: Relationship with semen quality and early miscarriage. Int J Androl. 2008;31:557–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Janevic T, Kahn LG, Landsbergis P, Cirillo PM, Cohn BA, Liu X, et al. Effects of work and life stress on semen quality. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:530–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hjollund NH, Bonde JP, Henriksen TB, Giwercman A, Olsen J. Reproductive effects of male psychologic stress. Epidemiology. 2004;15:21–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Handelsman DJ, Staraj S. Testicular size: the effects of aging, malnutrition, and illness. J Androl. 1985;6:144–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bray I, Gunnell D, Davey SG. Advanced paternal age: how old is too old? J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2006;60:851–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Khera M, Broderick GA, Carson CC 3rd, Dobs AS, Faraday MM, Goldstein I, et al. Adult-Onset Hypogonadism. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:908–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Brahem S, Mehdi M, Elghezal H, Saad A. The effects of male aging on semen quality, sperm DNA fragmentation and chromosomal abnormalities in an infertile population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:425–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Agarwal A, Makker K, Sharma R. Clinical relevance of oxidative stress in male factor infertility: an update. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008;59:2–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Mullen JB. Age-related decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:496–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Broer L, Codd V, Nyholt DR, Deelen J, Mangino M, Willemsen G, et al. Meta-analysis of telomere length in 19,713 subjects reveals high heritability, stronger maternal inheritance and a paternal age effect. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:1163–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Crow JF. The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat Rev Genet. 2000;1:40–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Reichman NE, Teitler JO. Paternal age as a risk factor for low birthweight. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:862–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Curley JP, Mashoodh R, Champagne FA. Epigenetics and the origins of paternal effects. Horm Behav. 2011;59:306–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Arslan RC, Willführ KP, Frans EM, KJH V, Bürkner PC, Myrskylä M, et al. Older fathers’ children have lower evolutionary fitness across four centuries and in four populations. Proc Biol Sci. 2017.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lian ZH, Zack MM, Erickson JD. Paternal age and the occurrence of birth defects. Am J Hum Genet. 1986;39:648–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Alio AP, Salihu HM, McIntosh C, August EM, Weldeselasse H, Sanchez E, et al. The effect of paternal age on fetal birth outcomes. Am J Mens Health. 2012;6:427–35.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Orioli IM, Castilla EE, Scarano G, Mastroiacovo P. Effect of paternal age in achondroplasia, thanatophoric dysplasia, and osteogenesis imperfecta. Am J Med Genet. 1995;59:209–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    D’Onofrio BM, Rickert ME, Frans E, Kuja-Halkola R, Almqvist C, Sjolander A, et al. Paternal age at childbearing and offspring psychiatric and academic morbidity. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:432–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Harman D. The free radical theory of aging. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2003;5:557–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mueller A, Hermo L, Robaire B. The effects of aging on the expression of glutathione S-transferases in the testis and epididymis of the Brown Norway rat. J Androl. 1998;19:450–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jervis KM, Robaire B. The effects of long-term vitamin E treatment on gene expression and oxidative stress damage in the aging Brown Norway rat epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1088–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Weir CP, Robaire B. Spermatozoa have decreased antioxidant enzymatic capacity and increased reactive oxygen species production during aging in the Brown Norway rat. J Androl. 2007;28:229–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. Free radicals, lipid peroxidation, cell damage and antioxidant therapy. Lancet. 1984;1:1396–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Selvaratnam JS, Robaire B. Effects of Aging and Oxidative Stress on Spermatozoa of Superoxide-Dismutase 1- and Catalase-Null Mice. Biol Reprod. 2016.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lawson G, Fletcher R. Delayed fatherhood. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2014;40:283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Mahmoud AM, Goemaere S, El-Garem Y, Van Pottelbergh I, Comhaire FH, Kaufman JM. Testicular volume in relation to hormonal indices of gonadal function in community-dwelling elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:179–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Neaves WB, Johnson L, Porter JC, Parker CR Jr, Petty CS. Leydig cell numbers, daily sperm production, and serum gonadotropin levels in aging men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;59:756–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Johnson L, Abdo JG, Petty CS, Neaves WB. Effect of age on the composition of seminiferous tubular boundary tissue and on the volume of each component in humans. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:1045–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sasano N, Ichijo S. Vascular patterns of the human testis with special reference to its senile changes. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1969;99:269–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ilacqua A, Francomano D, Aversa A. The physiology of the testis. In: Belfiore A, LeRoith D, editors. Principles of Endocrinology and Hormone Action, Endocrinology. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2018. p. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Wu FC, Tajar A, Pye SR, Silman AJ, Finn JD, O’Neill TW, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis disruptions in older men are differentially linked to age and modifiable risk factors: the European Male Aging Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2737–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:237–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Stone BA, Alex A, Werlin LB, Marrs RP. Age thresholds for changes in semen parameters in men. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:952–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Muratori M, Marchiani S, Tamburrino L, Cambi M, Lotti F, Natali I, et al. DNA fragmentation in brighter sperm predicts male fertility independently from age and semen parameters. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:582–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Cho CL, Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC. The correct interpretation of sperm DNA fragmentation test. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S621–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Johnson SL, Dunleavy J, Gemmell NJ, Nakagawa S. Consistent age-dependent declines in human semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;19:22–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Carlini T, Paoli D, Pelloni M, Faja F, Dal Lago A, Lombardo F, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation in Italian couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;34:58–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Alvarez Sedó C, Bilinski M, Lorenzi D, Uriondo H, Noblía F, Longobucco V, et al. Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on embryo development: clinical and biological aspects. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21:343–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;1(99):673–7.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    . Calogero AE, Aversa A, La Vignera S, Corona G, Ferlin A. The use of nutraceuticals in male sexual and reproductive disturbances: position statement from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS). J Endocrinol Invest. 2017; 40:1389–1397.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Nayanatara AK, Vinodini NA, Ahemed B, Ramaswamy CR, Ramesh BS. Role of ascorbic acid in monosodium glutamate mediated effect on testicular weight, sperm morphology and sperm count, in rat testis. J Chin clin med. 2008;3:1–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Berridge MJ. Inositol lipids and cell proliferation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;907:33–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Marat AL, Haucke V. Phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphates-at the interface between cell signalling and membrane traffic. EMBO J. 2016;35:561–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    . Ho HC, Suarez SS. An inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-gated intracellular Ca (2+) store is involved in regulating sperm hyperactivated motility. Biol Reprod 2001; 65: 1606–1615.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Ho HC, Suarez SS. Characterization of the intracellular calcium store at the base of the sperm flagellum that regulates hyperactivated motility. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:1590–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Harper CV, Barratt CL, Publicover SJ. Stimulation of human spermatozoa with progesterone gradients to simulate approach to the oocyte. Induction of [ Ca (2+)] (i) oscillations and cyclical transitions in flagellar beating. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:46315–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Costello S, Michelangeli F, Nash K, Lefievre L, Morris J, Machado-Oliveira G, et al. Ca2+ stores in sperm: their identities and functions. Reproduction. 2009;138:425–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Lishko PV, Kirichok Y, Ren D, Navarro B, Chung JJ, Clapham DE. The control of male fertility by spermatozoan ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:453–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Gressier B, Cabanis A, Lebegue S, Brunet C, Dine T, Luyckx M, et al. Decrease of hypochlorous acid and hydroxyl radical generated by stimulated human neutrophils: Comparison in vitro of some thiol-containing drugs. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1994;16:9–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Erkkilä K, Hirvonen V, Wuokko E, Parvinen M, Dunkel L. N-acetyl-L-cysteine inhibits apoptosis in human male germ cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:2523–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Oeda T, Henkel R, Ohmori H, Schill WB. Scavenging effect of N-acetyl-L-cysteine against reactive oxygen species in human semen: A possible therapeutic modality for male factor infertility? Andrologia. 1997;29:125–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Safarinejad MR, Safarinejad S. Efficacy of selenium and/or N-acetyl-cysteine for improving semen parameters in infertile men: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized study. J Urol. 2009;181:741–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    de Angelis C, Galdiero M, Pivonello C, Garifalos F, Menafra D, Cariati F, et al. The role of vitamin D in male fertility: A focus on the testis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18:285–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Showell MG, Mackenzie-Proctor R, Brown J, Yazdani A, Stankiewicz MT, Hart RJ. Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014.

  86. 86.

    Norman RJ, Noakes M, Wu R, Davies MJ, Moran L, Wang JX. Improving reproductive performance in overweight/obese women with effective weight management. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:267–80.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    World Health Organization, 2017. Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet no 311 http://wwwwhoint/gho/ncd/risk_factors/overweight/en/. Reviewed February 2018

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Ilacqua A, Francomano D, Aversa A. Obesity and testicular function. In: Lenzi A, Migliaccio S, Donini LM, editors. Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity: From Assessment to Treatment; 2015. p. 99–106.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Maresch CC, Stute DC, Alves MG, Oliveira PF, de Kretser DM, Linn T. Diabetes-induced hyperglycemia impairs male reproductive function: a systematic review. Reprod Update. 2018;24:86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Rato L, Alves MG, Cavaco JE, Oliveira PF. High-energy diets: a threat for male fertility? Obes Rev. 2014;15:996–1007.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Mitchell M, Bakos HW, Lane M. Paternal diet-induced obesity impairs embryo development and implantation in the mouse. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1349–53.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Ibáñez CA, Erthal RP, Ogo FM, MNC P, Vieira HR, Conejo C, et al. A High Fat Diet during Adolescence in Male Rats Negatively Programs Reproductive and Metabolic Function Which Is Partially Ameliorated by Exercise. Front Physiol. 2017;8:807.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Erdemir F, Atilgan DMF, Boztepe O, Siha-àrlaktas B, Sahin S. The effect of diet induced obesity on testicular tissue and serum oxidative stress parameters. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2012;36:153–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Mortazavi M, Salehi I, Alizadeh Z, Vahabian M, Roushandeh AM. Protective effects of antioxidants on sperm parameters and seminiferous tubules epithelium in high fat-fed rats. J Reprod Infertil. 2014;15:22–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    . Santos M, Rodriguez-Gonzalez GL, Ibanez C, Vega CC, Nathanielsz PW, Zambrano E. Adult exercise effects on oxidative stress and reproductive programming in male offspring of obese rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2015; 308: R219–R225.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Rato L, Alves MG, Dias TR, Lopes G, Cavaco JE, Socorro S, et al. High-energy diets may induce a pre-diabetic state altering testicular glycolytic metabolic profile and male reproductive parameters. Andrology. 2013;1:495–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Fan W, Xu Y, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Lu L, Ding Z. Obesity or Overweight, a Chronic Inflammatory Status in Male Reproductive System, Leads to Mice and Human Subfertility. Front Physiol. 2018.

  98. 98.

    Braga D, Halpern G, Figueira R, Setti AS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Food intake and social habits in male patients and its relationship to intracytoplasic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:53–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Mendiola J, Torres-Cantero AM, Moreno-Grau JM, Ten J, Roca M, Moreno-Grau S, et al. Food intake and its relationship with semen quality: a case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:812–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Attaman JA, Toth TL, Furtado J, Campos H, Hauser R, Chavarro JE. Dietary fat and semen quality among men attending a fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1466–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Afeiche MC, Gaskins AJ, Williams PL, Toth TL, Wright DL, Tanrikut C, et al. Processed meat intake is unfavorably and fish intake favorably associated with semen quality indicators among men attending a Fertility Clinic. J Nutr. 2014;144:1091–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Eslamian G, Amirjannati N, Rashidkhani B, Sadeghi MR, Hekmatdoost A. Intake of food groups and idiopathic asthenozoospermia: a case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3328–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Ricci E, Al-Beitawi S, Cipriani S, Alteri A, Chiaffarino F, Candiani M, et al. Dietary habits and semen parameters: a systematic narrative review. Andrology. 2018;6:104–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Karayiannis D, Kontogianni MD, Mendorou C, Douka L, Mastrominas M, Yiannakouris N. Association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and semen quality parameters in malepartners of couples attempting fertility. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:215–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Jurewicz J, Radwan M, Sobala W, Radwan P, Bochenek M, Hanke W. Dietary patterns and their relationship with semen quality. Am J Mens Health. 2016;93:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Afeiche MC, Williams PL, Gaskins AJ, Mendiola J, Jørgensen N, Swan SH, et al. Meat intake and reproductive parameters among young men. Epidemiology. 2014;25:323–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Seifert SM, Schaechter JL, Hershorin ER, Lipshultz SE. Health effects of energy drinks on children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics. 2011;127:511–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Friedman L, Weinberger MA, Farber TM, Moreland FM, Peters EL, Gilmore CE, et al. Testicular atrophy and impaired spermatogenesis in rats fed high levels of the methylxanthines caffeine, theobromine, or theophylline. J Environ Pathol Toxicol. 1979;2:687–706.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Pollard I, Williamson S, Magre SJ. Influence of caffeine administered during pregnancy on the early differentiation of fetal rat ovaries and testes. J Dev Physiol. 1990;13:59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Bae J, Choi H, Choi Y, Roh J. Dose- and time-related effects of caffeine on the testis in immature male rats. Exp Anim. 2017;66(1):29–39.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Dorostghoal M, Erfani Majd N, Nooraei P. Maternal caffeine consumption has irreversible effects on reproductive parameters and fertility in male offspring rats. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012;39:144–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Zini A, Bach PV, Al-Malki AH, Schlegel PN. Use of testicular sperm for ICSI in oligozoospermic couples: how far should we go? Hum Reprod. 2017;32:7–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Bach PV, Schlegel PN. Sperm DNA damage and its role in IVF and ICSI. Basic Clin Androl. 2016.

  114. 114.

    Henriksen EJ. Invited review: effects of acute exercise and exercise training on insulin resistance. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93:788–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Gaesser GA, Angadi SS, Sawyer BJ. Exercise and diet, independent of weight loss, improve cardiometabolic risk profile in overweight and obese individuals. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39:87–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Gomes RM, Tofolo LP, Rinaldi W, Scomparin DX, Grassiolli S, Barella LF, et al. Moderate exercise restores pancreatic Beta-cell function and autonomic nervous system activity in obese rats induced by high-fat diet. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;32:310–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Palmer NO, Bakos HW, Owens JA, Setchell BP, Lane M. Diet and exercise in an obese mouse fed a high-fat diet improve metabolic health and reverse perturbed sperm function. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;302:E768–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Eisenberg ML, Kim S, Chen Z, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, Buck Louis GM. The relationship between male BMI and waist circumference on semen quality: Data from the LIFE study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:193–200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Hjollund NH, Storgaard L, Ernst E, Bonde JP, Olsen J. The relation between daily activities and scrotal temperature. Reprod Tox. 2002;16:209.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Mastaloudis A, Leonard SW, Traber MG. Oxidative stress in athletes during extreme endurance exercise Free. Radical Biol Med. 2001;31:911–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Saleh R, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Androl. 2002;23:737–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Safarinejad MR, Azma K, Kolahi AA. The effects of intensive, long-term treadmill running on reproductive hormones, hypothalamus-pituitary-testis axis, and semen quality: a randomized controlled study. J Endocrinol. 2009;200:259–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Vaamonde D, Da Silva-Grigoletto ME, Garcia-Manso JM, Barrera N, Vaamonde-Lemos R. Physically active men show better semen parameters and hormone values than sedentary men. Eur J Appl Phys. 2012;112:3267–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Lalinde-Acevedo PC, BJM M-T, Agarwal A, du Plessis SS, Ahmad G, Cadavid ÁP, et al. Physically Active Men Show Better Semen Parameters than Their Sedentary Counterparts. Int J Fertil Steril. 2017;11:156–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Gaskins AJ, Mendiola J, Afeiche M, Jørgensen N, Swan SH, Chavarro JE. Physical activity and television watching in relation to semen quality in young men. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:265–70.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Hajizadeh Maleki B, Tartibian B, Chehrazi M. The effects of three different exercise modalities on markers of male reproduction in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial. Reproduction. 2017;153:157–74.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Jung A, Strauss P, Lindner HJ, Schuppe HC. Influence of moderate cycling on scrotal temperature. Int J Androl. 2008;31:403–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Wang X, Liu F, Gao X, Liu X, Kong X, Wang H. Comparative proteomic analysis of heat stress proteins associated with rat sperm maturation. Mol Med Rep. 2016;13:3547–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Rao M, Xia W, Yang J, Hu LX, Hu SF, Lei H, et al. Transient scrotal hyperthermia affects human sperm DNA integrity, sperm apoptosis, and sperm protein expression. Andrology. 2016;4:1054–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Sabes-Alsina M, Tallo-Parra O, Mogas MT, Morrell JM, Lopez-Bejar M. Heat stress has an effect on motility and metabolic activity of rabbit spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Alves MB, Andrade AF, Arruda RP, Batissaco L, Florez-Rodriguez SA, Oliveira BM, et al. Recovery of normal testicular temperature after scrotal heat stress in rams assessed by infraired thermography and its effects on seminal characteristics and testosterone blood serum concentration. Theriogenology. 2016.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Durairajanayagam D, Agarwal A, Ong C. Causes, effects and molecular mechanism of testicular heat stress. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30:14–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Aitken RJ, Baker MA. Oxidative stress, sperm survival and fertility control. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;250:66–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Momen MN, Ananian FB, Fahmy IM, Mostafa T. Effects of high environmental temperature on semen parameters among fertile men. Fert Ster. 2010;39:203–15.

    Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Sieber MH, Thomsen MB, Spradling AC. Electron transport chain remodeling by GSK3 during oogenesis connects nutrient state to reproduction. Cell. 2016;164:420–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Zhu X, Shi D, Li X, Gong W, Wu F, Guo X, et al. TLR signaling affects sperm mitochondrial function and motility via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and glycogen synthase kinase-3alpha. Cell Signal. 2016;28:148–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Gong Y, Guo H, Zhang Z, Zhou H, Zhao R, He B. Heat Stress Reduces Sperm Motility via Activation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3a and Inhibition of Mitochondrial Protein Import. Front Physiol. 2017.

  138. 138.

    Yaeram J, Setchell BP, Maddocks S. Effect of heat stress on the fertility of male mice in vivo and in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;18:647–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Wechalekar H, Setchell BP, Peirce EJ, Ricci M, Leigh C, Breed WG, et al. Whole-body heat exposure induces membrane changes in spermatozoa from the cauda epididymidis of laboratory mice. Asian J Androl. 2010;12:591–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    JJ MG, Agarwal A. The Impact of Cell Phone, Laptop Computer, and Microwave Oven Usage on Male Fertility. In: du Plessis SS, et al., editors. Male Infertility: A Complete Guide to Lifestyle and Environmental Factors. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2014.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Oni O, Amuda D, Gilbert C. Effects of radiofrequency radiation from WiFi devices on human ejaculated semen. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci. 2011;19:292–4.

    Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D'Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. J Androl. 2012;33:350–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Lee HJ, Pack JK, Kim TH, Kim N, Choi SY, Lee JS, et al. The lack of histological changes of CDMA cellular phone-based radio frequency on rat testis. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010;31:528–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Yan JG, Agresti M, Bruce T, Yan YH, Granlund A, Matloub HS. Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:957–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Adams JA, Galloway TS, Mondal D, Esteves SC, Mathews F. Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2014;70:106–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Figà-Talamanca I, Cini C, Varricchio GC, Dondero F, Gandini L, Lenzi A, et al. Effects of prolonged autovehicle driving on male reproductive function: a study among taxi drivers. Amer J Industr Med. 1996;30:750–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Parazzini F, Marchini M, Luchini L, Tozzi L, Mezzopane R, Fedele L. Tight underpants and trousers and risk of dyspermia. Int J Androl. 1995;18:137–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Garolla A, Torino M, Sartini B, Cosci I, Patassini C, Carraro U, et al. Seminal and molecular evidence that sauna exposure affects human spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:877–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Osman MW, Nikolopoulos I, Haoula Z, Kannamannadiar J, Atiomo W. A study of the effect of the FertilMateTM scrotum cooling patch on male fertility. SCOP trial (scrotal cooling patch) Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2012.

  150. 150.

    Nikolopoulos I, Osman W, Haoula Z, Jayaprakasan K, Atiomo W. Scrotal cooling and its benefits to male fertility: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33:338–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to thank Dr. Andrea D’Anselmo for the english revision of the manuscript.


Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information




AI and GI collected data and wrote the manuscript; AA was a major contributor in drafting end editing the manuscript; GPE and CB edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Aversa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study did not require Ethics approval and consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

“The authors declare that they have no competing interests”.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilacqua, A., Izzo, G., Emerenziani, G.P. et al. Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 16, 115 (2018).

Download citation


  • Male fertility
  • Lifestyle factors
  • Stress
  • Nutrition
  • Physical exercise
  • Natality