Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Altered miRNA profile in testis of post-cryptorchidopexy patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

Contributed equally
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology201816:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0393-3

  • Received: 13 May 2018
  • Accepted: 31 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Cryptorchidism is one of the most common causes of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) leading to male infertility. Despite various medical approaches been utilised, many patients still suffer from infertility. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play vital roles in the progress of spermatogenesis; however, little is known about the miRNA expression profile in the testes. Therefore, the miRNA profile was assessed in the testis of post-cryptorchidopexy patients.

Methods

Three post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue samples from patients aged 23, 26 and 28 years old and three testis tissues from patients with obstructive azoospermia (controls) aged 24, 25 and 36 years old were used in this study. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to perform the miRNA expression profiling. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays were subsequently used to confirm the results of several randomly-selected and annotated miRNAs.

Results

A series of miRNAs were found to be altered between post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissues and control tissues, including 297 downregulated and 152 upregulated miRNAs. In the subsequent qRT-PCR assays, the expression levels of most of the selected miRNAs (9/12, P < 0.05) were consistent with the results of NGS technology. Furthermore, signal transduction, adaptive immune response and biological regulation were associated with the putative target genes of the differentially-expressed miRNAs via GO analysis. In addition, oxidative phosphorylation, Parkinson’s disease and ribosomal pathways were shown to be enriched using KEGG pathway analysis of the differentially-expressed genes.

Conclusions

This study provides a global view of the miRNAs involved in post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissues as well as the altered expression of miRNAs compared to control tissues, thus confirming the vital role of miRNAs in cryptorchidism.

Keywords

  • miRNA
  • Cryptorchidism
  • Cryptorchidopexy
  • Spermatogenesis
  • Next-generation small RNA sequencing

Background

Male factors account for approximately 50% of infertility cases, which affect 10–15% of couples around the world [1]. Although most cases of male infertility are idiopathic with no known etiological factor, some causes (i.e. varicocele, sexual dysfunction etc.) are known [2]. Among these causes, cryptorchidism is a relatively common anomaly in the male genitalia that affects approximately 2–4% of male infants. Despite various medical approaches (i.e. surgical operations and hormone administration) being applied for years, many patients still suffer from infertility [3, 4], and little is known about the clear mechanism of spermatogenesis arrest in these patients.

Spermatogenesis is a complex process consisted of three phases including mitotic, meiotic and haploid processes [5]. These cellular events require highly regulated spatiotemporal expression of specific protein-coding genes, especailly at the post-transcriptional levels [6]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a series of small noncoding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression after transcription [7]. Research has shown that miRNAs play crucial roles in spermatogenesis [5, 6, 813]; for example, Lian et al. identified a series of altered miRNAs in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) using microarray technology. These identified 154 significantly downregulated and 19 upregulated miRNAs indicated the important role of miRNAs in spermatogenesis [10]. It was reported that during mouse testicular development, up-regulation of miR-449 coincided with initiation of meiotic, and miR-449 was predominantly expressed in spermatocytes and spermatids during adult spermatogenesis. Furthermore, Cdc20b/miR-449 cluster activity was documented to be cooperatively mediated by CREMT and SOX5 during postnatal testes development [5]. Later on, Comazzetto et al. have identified the miR-34 family consisted of miR-34b/c and miR-449a/b/c as upregulated from late meiosis to sperm stage. miR-34b/c and miR-449 deletion led to sterility due to abnormal spermatozoa production with reduced motility [11]. With regards to the effects of miRNAs in cryptorchidism, Duan et al. found that miR-210, a significantly upregulated miRNA in patients with NOA, was also highly expressed in patients with cryptorchidism [12]. In addition, Moritoki et al. demonstrated that miR-135a was downregulated in unilateral undescended testes in a rat model of cryptorchidism [13].

Although some miRNAs were shown to be involved in the regulation of spermatogenesis in patients with cryptorchidism, no studies have yet investigated miRNA expression in the testis of post-cryptorchidopexy patients with NOA. Therefore this study investigated the miRNA profile in the testis of post-cryptorchidopexy patients and aimed to provide a platform to expound the mechanism of spermatogenesis arrest in post-cryptorchidopexy patients with NOA.

Methods

Ethics statement

Three patients (23, 26 and 28 years old) who underwent cryptorchidopexy but were still experiencing NOA, as well as three patients (24, 25 and 36 years old) suffering from obstructive azoospermia (OA) signed informed consent and approved the use of their tissues for research purposes. The local medical ethics committee approved this study.

Clinical specimen collection

Testes tissues were collected by testicular biopsy from all six subjects between July 2017 and January 2018 at the Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Hefei, Anhui, China). For post-cryptorchidopexy patients, all cases were bilateral. Case one was 23 years old and underwent the operation 1 year ago, case two was 26 years old and underwent the operation 18 years ago and case three was 28 years old and underwent the operation 12 years ago. Testes samples were frozen at − 80 °C in RNAlater (Ambion, USA) immediately after surgery. Haematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and the Johnson score system were used to assess testicular spermatogenic function.

Construction of a smRNA library and next-generation sequencing (NGS)

Total RNA was extracted from the six samples using TRIzol (Life Technologies, USA) and was used to construct miRNA libraries using the NEBNext® Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set (Illumina®) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed on a Hiseq X (Illumina) using the HiSeq X Reagent Kit v2.

Data analyses and novel miRNA exploration

Data were analysed according to previously-reported methods. Known miRNAs were identified by mapping reads to miRBase (version 21.0) in Homo sapiens, whilst nonmatched reads were subsequently aligned against other noncoding RNAs within the Ensembl database [14]. The remaining nonannotated sequences were selected for alignment with the integrated human transcriptome to explore novel miRNAs. All hairpin-like structures containing unclassified smRNA reads (no less than 45 reads) were predicted using miRDeep2 [15] following the criteria described previously [16].

Bioinformatic analyses for miRNAs with differential expression patterns

The target genes of the differentially-expressed miRNAs in the two groups were predicted using TargetScan [17] and miRanda [18]. Enriched GO terms and KEGG pathway analysis was subsequently applied to predict the target genes of miRNAs with differential expression patterns in the two groups of specimens.

QRT-PCR verification for altered miRNA expression

cDNA synthesis was performed using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Takara, Japan). The abundance of individual miRNAs was subsequently assessed via an Applied Biosystems 7500 PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus, Takara) under optimised reaction conditions. The specific reverse transcription and qPCR primers for all miRNAs are listed in Additional file 1. The processes were performed in accordance with the protocols supplied by the manufacturers. Briefly, for qPCR, triplicate reactions were performed at 95 °C for 10 min, and the subsequent 40 amplification cycles were conducted at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s. Meanwhile, 18S rRNA was used as an internal normalised control. Relative miRNA abundances were calculated using 2Ct (threshold cycle) formula, where Ct = CtmiRNA − Ct18S rRNA and Ct = (Ctpost-cryptorchidopexy − Ctobstructive azoospermia). The miRNA concentration differences between post-cryptorchidopexy and control tissues were analysed using unpaired t-tests. P < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

Histopathological characteristics of post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue and control tissue

To clarify the histopathological characteristics of the post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue (hereafter referred to as ‘cryptorchid tissue’) and control tissue (hereafter referred to as ‘normal tissue’), HE staining and the Johnson scoring system were used to assess the function of spermatogenesis (Fig. 1). The Johnson scores were 3, 3 and 3 in cryptorchid tissues, which indicated maturation arrest, and 9, 9 and 10 in normal control tissues, which indicated normal spermatogenesis.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

HE-staining of cryptorchid tissue and control tissue, which clarify the histopathological characteristics of cryptorchid tissues (a) and control tissues (b).

Comprehensive overview of whole genome smRNAs in cryptorchid and normal tissues

All smRNAs [18–32 nucleotides (nt)] acquired from cryptorchid and normal tissues were deep sequenced by NGS. A total of 19,931,698 (out of 21,212,215) and 20,243,124 (out of 21,524,351) sequence reads that aligned to the human genome sequence dataset were obtained in the cryptorchid and normal tissues, respectively. MiRNAs accounted for 85.5% and 71.19% in cryptorchid and normal tissues, respectively (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Results of geneome mapping and distribution of RNAs among different categories.

The most abundant of these smRNAs in cryptorchid tissue were 21 nt in length, and these smRNAs were more abundant than the 22-nt and 23-nt RNAs which were in second and third place, respectively. However, the most abundant smRNAs in normal tissue were 22 nt in length, and these were more abundant than the 21-nt and 23-nt RNAs which were in second and third place, respectively (see Additional file 2).

Understanding the distribution pattern of miRNA genes may help to elucidate their roles, therefore the chromosomal locations of miRNA genes were evaluated. In cryptorchid tissue, most miRNA genes were located on chromosomes X, 9, 3 and 21. Similarly, in normal tissues, most miRNA genes were located on chromosome X, 15, 9 and 5 (see Additional file 3).

Features of the most abundant miRNAs in cryptorchid and normal tissues

The NGS results were used to compile a list of the 20 most abundant and known miRNAs in cryptorchid tissue and the 10 most abundant and novel miRNAs in normal tissue. In cryptorchid tissue, miR-514a-3p, miR-143-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-99a-5p, miR-202-5p, miR-509-3-5p, miR-10b-5p, miR-508-3p, let-7 g-5p and let-7f-5p were the most abundant known miRNAs. In normal tissue, miR-514a-3p, miR-143-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-509-3-5p, miR-99a-5p, miR-202-5p, miR-10b-5p, let-7f-5p, miR-508-3p and let-7 g-5p were the most abundant known miRNAs (Table 1). Detailed information is shown in Table 1. Of the 10 most abundant novel miRNAs, only one was different between cryptorchid and normal tissues. Detailed information is shown in Table 2.
Table 1

The top 20 most abundant known miRNAs expressed in cryptorchid and normal tissues

miRNA name

Cryptorchid

miRNA name

Control

Reads count

Normalized reads count

Reads count

Normalized reads count

hsa-miR-514a-3p

2,313,282

109,499

hsa-miR-514a-3p

1,008,914

98,435

hsa-miR-143-3p

864,140

45,306

hsa-miR-143-3p

677,433

65,245

hsa-miR-26a-5p

829,953

46,035

hsa-miR-26a-5p

407,763

39,613

hsa-miR-99a-5p

705,575

38,041

hsa-miR-509-3-5p

392,074

37,711

hsa-miR-202-5p

616,580

30,770

hsa-miR-99a-5p

346,310

33,871

hsa-miR-509-3-5p

593,363

28,054

hsa-miR-202-5p

258,855

25,790

hsa-miR-10b-5p

428,806

24,984

hsa-miR-10b-5p

248,352

24,218

hsa-miR-508-3p

303,445

14,625

hsa-let-7f-5p

154,806

15,116

hsa-let-7 g-5p

296,741

15,472

hsa-miR-508-3p

153,631

15,059

hsa-let-7f-5p

266,118

14,707

hsa-let-7 g-5p

151,745

14,851

hsa-let-7a-5p

265,013

14,644

hsa-let-7a-5p

137,886

13,412

hsa-miR-21-5p

248,959

12,378

hsa-miR-21-5p

132,197

12,931

hsa-miR-509-5p

194,212

9293

hsa-miR-148a-3p

119,576

11,671

hsa-miR-148a-3p

188,828

10,645

hsa-miR-100-5p

103,191

10,071

hsa-miR-125b-5p

172,432

9013

hsa-miR-125b-5p

93,627

9134

hsa-miR-100-5p

169,375

9160

hsa-miR-27b-3p

92,637

8927

hsa-miR-199a-3p

154,971

8592

hsa-miR-509-5p

81,898

8124

hsa-miR-27b-3p

144,132

7610

hsa-miR-126-3p

79,980

7687

hsa-let-7i-5p

140,689

7772

hsa-miR-125a-5p

72,130

7013

hsa-let-7b-5p

112,327

6040

hsa-miR-34c-5p

69,568

6885

hsa-miR-125a-5p

107,449

5594

hsa-let-7i-5p

66,915

6560

Table 2

The list of top 10 most abundant novel miRNAs expressed in cryptorchid and normal tissues

Cryptorchid tissues

miRNA ID

Mature Sequence

Reads count

Location of novel miRNA precusor

chrX_47246

AUUGACACUUCUGUGAGUAGA

2,280,438

chrX:146366172..146366230:-

chr12_27425

UUCAAGUAAUCCAGGAUAGGCU

826,714

chr12:58218403..58218462:-

chr3_5958

UUCAAGUAAUCCAGGAUAGGCU

826,558

chr3:38010903..38010964:+

chr21_44054

AACCCGUAGAUCCGAUCUUGU

693,017

chr21:17911420..17911480:+

chrX_47235

UACUGCAGACGUGGCAAUCAUG

592,879

chrX:146341178..146341235:-

chr10_23103

UUCCUAUGCAUAUACUUCUUU

586,995

chr10:135061041..135061097:-

chr5_9937

UGAGAUGAAGCACUGUAGCUC

534,462

chr5:148808506..148808561:+

chr2_3766

UACCCUGUAGAACCGAAUUUGU

428,617

chr2:177015056..177015117:+

chrX_47228

UGAUUGUAGCCUUUUGGAGUAGA

298,225

chrX:146318462..146318520:-

chr3_7283

UGAGGUAGUAGUUUGUACAGUU

295,643

chr3:52302295..52302373:-

Normal tissues

miRNA ID

Mature Sequence

Reads count

Location of novel miRNA precusor

chrX_47246

AUUGACACUUCUGUGAGUAGA

996,346

chrX:146366172..146366230:-

chr5_9937

UGAGAUGAAGCACUGUAGCUC

419,103

chr5:148808506..148808561:+

chr12_27425

UUCAAGUAAUCCAGGAUAGGCU

405,817

chr12:58218403..58218462:-

chr3_5958

UUCAAGUAAUCCAGGAUAGGCU

405,621

chr3:38010903..38010964:+

chrX_47235

UACUGCAGACGUGGCAAUCAUG

391,755

chrX:146341178..146341235:-

chr21_44054

AACCCGUAGAUCCGAUCUUGU

340,009

chr21:17911420..17911480:+

chr2_3766

UACCCUGUAGAACCGAAUUUGU

248,236

chr2:177015056..177015117:+

chr10_23103

UUCCUAUGCAUAUACUUCUUU

246,558

chr10:135061041..135061097:-

chr9_18744

UGAGGUAGUAGAUUGUAUAGUU

154,925

chr9:96938634..96938712:+

chr3_7283

UGAGGUAGUAGUUUGUACAGUU

151,154

chr3:52302295..52302373:-

Differential expression of miRNAs between cryptorchid and normal tissues

As described previously by Zhang et al. [16], miRNAs were considered to be significantly differentially expressed between cryptorchid and normal tissues if they were altered by at least two-fold with P < 0.05 on the t-test. The results showed that 449 miRNAs were significantly differentially expressed in cryptorchid tissue (Fig. 3). Of these, 297 were downregulated and 152 were upregulated compared to normal tissue. The 30 most downregulated and upregulated known miRNAs are listed in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The overview of the volcano plot generated by miRNAs profile in cryptorchid tissues and control tissues.

Table 3

A collection of the top 30 most downregulated known miRNAs detected by deep sequencing in cryptorchid tissues

MiRNA name

baseMean

log2FoldChange

lfcSE

stat

p

Adjust p

hsa-miR-3663-5p

41.936

−4.426

0.624

−7.089

1.35E-12

2.39E-10

hsa-miR-1233-3p

25.216

−4.227

0.679

−6.225

4.79E-10

1.84E-08

hsa-miR-552-5p

66.556

−4.055

0.563

−7.195

6.24E-13

1.21E-10

hsa-miR-449b-5p

392.523

−3.972

0.496

−8.001

1.23E-15

5.26E-13

hsa-miR-7153-5p

108.897

− 3.812

0.634

−6.010

1.84E-09

5.18E-08

hsa-miR-122-5p

525.785

−3.790

0.562

−6.741

1.57E-11

1.60E-09

hsa-miR-552-3p

65.189

−3.760

0.562

−6.680

2.38E-11

2.31E-09

hsa-miR-449a

5575.001

−3.740

0.511

−7.317

2.52E-13

5.97E-11

hsa-miR-122-3p

4.738

−3.722

1.011

−3.679

0.00023

0.0016

hsa-miR-34b-5p

123.524

−3.688

0.558

−6.610

3.84E-11

3.56E-09

hsa-miR-449c-5p

2234.173

−3.637

0.465

−7.816

5.42E-15

1.93E-12

hsa-miR-34c-5p

39,328.272

−3.553

0.440

−8.060

7.58E-16

5.26E-13

hsa-miR-449c-3p

7.961

−3.441

0.902

−3.812

0.00014

0.0011

hsa-miR-375

491.449

−3.408

0.362

−9.416

4.68E-21

9.99E-18

hsa-miR-3663-3p

37.612

−3.385

0.676

−5.001

5.68E-07

9.63E-06

hsa-miR-7159-5p

20.897

−3.259

0.705

−4.618

3.87E-06

5.29E-05

hsa-miR-449b-3p

142.460

−3.212

0.610

−5.262

1.42E-07

2.75E-06

hsa-miR-4700-5p

4.985

−3.208

0.951

−3.370

0.00075

0.0043

hsa-miR-522-3p

121.036

−3.153

0.465

−6.768

1.30E-11

1.46E-09

hsa-miR-1273a

38.566

−3.118

0.508

−6.135

8.47E-10

2.44E-08

hsa-miR-1295a

11.735

−3.075

0.760

−4.041

5.31E-05

0.0005

hsa-miR-34b-3p

1137.731

−2.970

0.516

−5.753

8.72E-09

2.16E-07

hsa-miR-1283

139.436

−2.798

0.488

−5.731

9.95E-09

2.41E-07

hsa-miR-3150b-3p

3.547

−2.768

0.991

−2.791

0.0052

0.020

hsa-miR-4423-3p

16.582

−2.702

0.755

−3.578

0.00035

0.0023

hsa-miR-6507-5p

7.696

−2.698

0.811

−3.325

0.00088

0.0049

hsa-miR-7154-5p

406.827

−2.646

0.981

−2.697

0.0070

0.025

hsa-miR-517c-3p

95.074

−2.639

0.386

−6.832

8.37E-12

9.92E-10

hsa-miR-3925-3p

10.324

−2.613

0.735

−3.553

0.00038

0.0025

hsa-miR-515-5p

84.007

−2.600

0.379

−6.856

7.04E-12

8.84E-10

Table 4

A collection of the top 30 most upregulated known miRNAs detected by deep sequencing in cryptorchid tissues

MiRNA name

baseMean

log2FoldChange

lfcSE

stat

p

Adjust p

hsa-miR-7151-3p

6.026

2.634

0.892

2.953

0.0031

0.014

hsa-miR-376a-2-5p

10.918

2.202

0.724

3.042

0.0023

0.011

hsa-miR-1224-5p

17.708

2.193

0.615

3.565

0.00036

0.0024

hsa-miR-1299

187.854

1.958

0.426

4.600

4.22E-06

5.73E-05

hsa-miR-142-5p

697.547

1.898

0.583

3.255

0.0011

0.0060

hsa-miR-543

1281.559

1.869

0.450

4.152

3.29E-05

0.00036

hsa-miR-487a-3p

80.564

1.865

0.591

3.155

0.0016

0.0079

hsa-miR-584-3p

19.666

1.829

0.562

3.254

0.0011

0.0060

hsa-miR-665

18.416

1.798

0.710

2.534

0.011

0.036

hsa-miR-134-3p

29.541

1.778

0.598

2.975

0.0029

0.013

hsa-miR-369-3p

500.851

1.692

0.432

3.916

8.99E-05

0.00082

hsa-miR-377-3p

96.245

1.665

0.551

3.023

0.0025

0.011

hsa-miR-33a-5p

28.103

1.664

0.550

3.025

0.0025

0.011

hsa-miR-376a-3p

112.0733

1.602

0.436

3.704

0.00021

0.0015

hsa-miR-758-3p

520.1303

1.589

0.439

3.620

0.00029

0.0020

hsa-miR-654-3p

4175.568

1.587

0.388

4.095

4.22E-05

0.00044

hsa-miR-134-5p

2747.859

1.558

0.424

3.675

0.00024

0.0017

hsa-miR-889-3p

740.3619

1.552

0.468

3.312

0.00093

0.0052

hsa-miR-127-3p

40,871.646

1.548

0.392

3.955

7.65E-05

0.00071

hsa-miR-1185-1-3p

161.457

1.539

0.506

3.039

0.0024

0.011

hsa-miR-1185-2-3p

38.541

1.534

0.587

2.614

0.0089

0.030

hsa-miR-154-5p

267.267

1.516

0.346

4.385

1.16E-05

0.00014

hsa-miR-381-3p

7512.422

1.511

0.382

3.957

7.57E-05

0.00070

hsa-miR-127-5p

768.176

1.511

0.401

3.765

0.00017

0.0013

hsa-miR-337-5p

44.570

1.510

0.439

3.437

0.00059

0.0036

hsa-miR-379-3p

262.022

1.508

0.401

3.756

0.00017

0.0013

hsa-miR-136-3p

937.135

1.506

0.389

3.868

0.00011

0.00096

hsa-miR-376c-3p

327.216

1.492

0.402

3.713

0.00020

0.0015

hsa-miR-495-3p

884.797

1.443

0.390

3.696

0.00022

0.0016

hsa-miR-376b-5p

24.828

1.442

0.590

2.445

0.014

0.045

Validating the altered expression level of miRNAs by qRT-PCR

QRT-PCR was performed to validate the altered miRNA expression. Among these deregulated miRNAs, we firstly selected two well-established spermatogenesis-associated miRNAs, miR-449a and miR-34c-5p [5, 11]. Additionally, to better proving the accuracy of NGS, the other validated miRNAs were picked from the non-top 30 most deregulated known miRNAs (see Additional file 4 and Additional file 5), so that the relatively small fold changes could be validated. According to the previous studies, ten miRNAs were picked for qRT-PCR validation randomly [16, 19]. Eventually, a total of 12 differentially-expressed miRNAs (seven upregulated and five downregulated) were selected for qRT-PCR analysis. The results showed that the expression levels of most miRNAs (9/12; P < 0.05) were consistent with the results of NGS technology. Detailed information is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Confirmation of differentially expressed miRNAs between cryptorchid tissues and control tissues obtained by NGS using qRT-PCR. (* P <0.05)

GO enrichment analysis of differentially-expressed genes in cryptorchid and normal tissues

After predicting the target genes of differentially-expressed miRNAs in cryptorchid and normal tissues, GO enrichment analysis was conducted. The 10 most enriched GO terms, including signal transduction and adaptive immune response, are shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Top 30 most enriched GO terms for predicted targets of differentially expressed miRNAs between cryptorchid and normal tissues

GO number

Term*

GO process

Ratio in study

Ratio in pop

p

GO:0007165

BP

signal transduction

19.68%

23.63%

1.04E-05

GO:0002250

BP

adaptive immune response

0.70%

1.83%

1.56E-05

GO:0050789

BP

regulation of biological process

47.95%

52.34%

4.14E-05

GO:0050794

BP

regulation of cellular process

45.10%

49.34%

7.66E-05

GO:0008150

BP

biological_process

78.42%

81.73%

8.25E-05

GO:0065007

BP

biological regulation

51.05%

55.25%

8.51E-05

GO:0006956

BP

complement activation

0.25%

0.98%

0.000114

GO:0006958

BP

complement activation, classical pathway

0.20%

0.88%

0.000134

GO:0048518

BP

positive regulation of biological process

21.53%

25.03%

0.00014

GO:0050776

BP

regulation of immune response

3.95%

5.72%

0.000229

GO:0044425

CC

membrane part

28.37%

34.86%

1.03E-10

GO:0005886

CC

plasma membrane

17.68%

23.38%

1.11E-10

GO:0031224

CC

intrinsic component of membrane

23.23%

29.30%

2.06E-10

GO:0016021

CC

integral component of membrane

22.68%

28.69%

2.24E-10

GO:0005575

CC

cellular_component

84.22%

88.01%

1.38E-07

GO:0005794

CC

Golgi apparatus

3.35%

5.84%

1.42E-07

GO:0005840

CC

ribosome

2.20%

1.09%

7.38E-06

GO:0000139

CC

Golgi membrane

1.85%

3.41%

1.92E-05

GO:0044459

CC

plasma membrane part

9.84%

12.81%

1.93E-05

GO:0004872

MF

receptor activity

5.39%

8.48%

5.53E-08

GO:0060089

MF

molecular transducer activity

5.39%

8.48%

5.53E-08

GO:0005179

MF

hormone activity

1.55%

0.54%

6.49E-08

GO:0004871

MF

signal transducer activity

5.79%

8.78%

2.25E-07

GO:0038023

MF

signaling receptor activity

4.45%

7.13%

3.21E-07

GO:0099600

MF

transmembrane receptor activity

4.25%

6.85%

4.09E-07

GO:0003823

MF

antigen binding

0.50%

1.75%

4.18E-07

GO:0004888

MF

transmembrane signaling receptor activity

4.15%

6.63%

9.33E-07

GO:0032553

MF

ribonucleotide binding

6.34%

8.94%

1.10E-05

GO:0003674

MF

molecular_function

77.82%

81.17%

7.79E-05

*BP Biological process; CC Cellular component; MF Molecular function

KEGG pathway analysis of differentially-expressed genes in cryptorchid and normal tissues

After GO analysis, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed. A total of five KEGG pathways were enriched, including oxidative phosphorylation, Parkinson’s disease, Ribosomal pathways, Huntington’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. The results are presented in Table 6.
Table 6

KEGG pathway analysis for predicted target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs between cryptorchid and normal tissues

Pathway ID

Description

GeneRatio

BgRatio

p

Adjust p

GeneName

hsa00190

Oxidative phosphorylation

28/664

133/7297

1.80E-05

0.0053

ATP5G2;COX6C;SDHD;COX7A2L;

COX8C;ATP6V1D

hsa05012

Parkinson’s disease

28/664

142/7297

6.29E-05

0.0093

ATP5G2;COX6C;SDHD;UBB;UBE2L6;COX7A2L;GNAL;COX8C

hsa03010

Ribosome

29/664

154/7297

0.0001112

0.0110

MRPL16;RPL38;RPS4X;MRPL35;

RPS6;MRPS18C;RPL26;RPS27L

hsa05016

Huntington’s disease

33/664

193/7297

0.0002633

0.0187

ATP5G2;COX6C;UCP1;SDHD;

POLR2J3;COX7A2L;COX8C;POLR2K

hsa05010

Alzheimer’s disease

30/664

171/7297

0.0003147

0.0187

ATP5G2;COX6C;CASP12;SDHD;

PPP3CC;COX7A2L;LPL;COX8C

Discussion

As one of the most common congenital defects in newborn boys, cryptorchidism influences male fertility and increases the risk of testicular cancer. Reductions in seminiferous tubules and germ cells are common histological changes in cryptorchid testis [20]. Despite surgery being recommended for many patients with cryptorchidism, the success of orchidopexy depends on the timing of the procedure and the position of the testis: some may not benefit from cryptorchidopexy [21, 22]. Although research has identified some biological processes involved in spermatogenic arrest in cryptorchid testis (i.e. significant apoptotic changes in germ cells), the causative roles of genes in spermatogenic arrest or apoptosis remain unclear [2326]. This is the first study to investigate the possible mechanisms of spermatogenic arrest in cryptorchid testes by assessing the miRNA profiles in post-cryptorchidopexy testes.

Many rodent and primate models were developed to identify altered miRNAs in cryptorchid testis. For example, Duan et al. established a mouse model of cryptorchidism and showed that miR-210 was highly expressed in cryptorchid testes compared with control testes. Moreover, they showed that this miRNA regulated spermatogenesis by inhibiting the expression of NR1D2 [12]. Moritoki et al. compared the miRNA expression profiles of unilateral undescended testes with contralateral descended testes in a rat model of cryptorchidism using microarray analysis. These authors found that only miR-135a expression was lower in unilateral undescended testes and that its target, FoxO1, played essential roles in stem cell maintenance [13]. Furthermore, Duan et al., also found that miR-210 was upregulated in human cryptorchidism, thus suggesting a vital role for miRNAs in humans [12]. In this study, 297 downregulated and 152 upregulated miRNAs were identified in post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue compared with normal testis tissue. However, miR-210 was not significantly altered, which may be due to the different types of human cryptorchid tissue. For example, Duan et al. used cryptorchid testis tissue obtained during the cryptorchidopexy, whilst this study used post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue. Some miRNA expression levels may change after the operation.

Despite the insights gained into cryptorchidism over the years, the mechanism of spermatogenesis arrest in patients with this disease remains largely elusive. Germ cell apoptosis is commonly seen at the histological level in cryptorchid testes. Yin et al. revealed that cryptorchidism induced germ cell apoptosis in an experimental mouse model via p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways [23]. Liu et al. also found that the Hsf1/Phlda1 pathway participated in primary spermatocyte apoptosis in surgery-induced cryptorchid testes of rats [27]. The expression of many apoptosis-related miRNAs was also shown to be altered in post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissues. It was reported that miR-299-5p could modulate apoptosis through autophagy in neurons and ameliorate the cognitive capacity of APPswe/PS1dE9 mice [28]. In addition, miR-299-5p was significantly upregulated in post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue. Similar results were also found for miR-217, miR-206 etc. Li et al. also found that miR-217 could regulate apoptosis by targeting TNFSF11 in human podocyte cells [29]. This study also identified a significant downregulation of miR-217 in post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue. Similarly, miR-206 was significantly upregulated in post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue and was shown to promoted cell apoptosis in Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease [30].

Conclusions

In summary, miRNA expression in post-cryptorchidopexy testicular tissue was profiled using NGS and compared with that of OA men with normal spermatogenesis. Several signalling pathways that are likely to be involved in spermatogenesis arrest in these patients were addressed. The results provide an important platform for future investigations into the roles of miRNAs in the progression of cryptorchidism as well as therapeutic targets to help these patients recover fertility. However, the comprehensive modulating behaviours of genes remain unclear, therefore determining the target genes and regulatory networks of these differentially-expressed miRNAs is essential in future investigations.

Notes

Abbreviations

HE: 

Hematoxylin-eosin

miRNAs: 

MicroRNAs

NGS: 

Next-generation sequencing

NOA: 

Non-obstructive azoospermia

OA: 

Obstructive azoospermia

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all subjects who provided the tissues for this study.

Funding

This study was funded by the the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81370749).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

DT, XH and XZ designed the study.ZH and HW performed the experiments.LZ and DP analyzed the data.DT and ZH wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and this study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
(3)
Anhui Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
(4)
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Matzuk MM, Lamb DJ. Genetic dissection of mammalian fertility pathways. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4(Suppl):s41–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e18–25.Google Scholar
  3. Kolon TF, Herndon CD, Baker LA, Baskin LS, Baxter CG, Cheng EY, et al. Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014;192:337–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthold JS, Gonzalez R. The epidemiology of congenital cryptorchidism, testicular ascent and orchiopexy. J Urol. 2003;170:2396–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bao J, Li D, Wang L, Wu J, Hu Y, Wang Z, et al. MicroRNA-449 and microRNA-34b/c function redundantly in murine testes by targeting E2F transcription factor-retinoblastoma protein (E2F-pRb) pathway. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:21686–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouhallier F, Allioli N, Lavial F, Chalmel F, Perrard MH, Durand P, et al. Role of miR-34c microRNA in the late steps of spermatogenesis. RNA. 2010;16:720–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tang D, Huang Y, Liu W, Zhang X. Up-regulation of microRNA-210 is associated with spermatogenesis by targeting IGF2 in male infertility. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:2905–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hilz S, Modzelewski AJ, Cohen PE, Grimson A. The roles of microRNAs and siRNAs in mammalian spermatogenesis. Development. 2016;143:3061–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Lian J, Zhang X, Tian H, Liang N, Wang Y, Liang C, et al. Altered microRNA expression in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Comazzetto S, Di Giacomo M, Rasmussen KD, Much C, Azzi C, Perlas E, et al. Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and infertility in mice deficient for miR-34b/c and miR-449 loci. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004597.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan Z, Huang H, Sun F. The functional and predictive roles of miR-210 in cryptorchidism. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32265.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Moritoki Y, Hayashi Y, Mizuno K, Kamisawa H, Nishio H, Kurokawa S, et al. Expression profiling of microRNA in cryptorchid testes: miR-135a contributes to the maintenance of spermatogonial stem cells by regulating FoxO1. J Urol. 2014;191:1174–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ensembl database. http://asia.ensembl.org/index.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
  15. MiRDeep2 http://www.mdc-berlin.de/8551903/en/research/research_teams/systems_biology_of_gene_regulatory_elements/projects/miRDeep. Accessed 29 Sept 2017.
  16. Zhang L, Wei P, Shen X, Zhang Y, Xu B, Zhou J, et al. MicroRNA expression profile in penile Cancer revealed by next-generation small RNA sequencing. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131336.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. TargetScan. http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
  18. John B, Enright AJ, Aravin A, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. Human MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e363.Google Scholar
  19. Zhou Y, Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhao T, Shan Z, Teng W. Circulating microrna profile as a potential predictive biomarker for early diagnosis of spontaneous abortion in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Agoulnik AI, Huang Z, Ferguson L. Spermatogenesis in cryptorchidism. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;825:127–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Taran I, Elder JS. Results of orchiopexy for the undescended testis. World J Urol. 2006;24:231–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadziselimovic F, Thommen L, Girard J, Herzog B. The significance of postnatal gonadotropin surge for testicular development in normal and cryptorchid testes. J Urol. 1986;136:274–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yin Y, DeWolf WC, Morgentaler A. Experimental cryptorchidism induces testicular germ cell apoptosis by p53-dependent and -independent pathways in mice. Biol Reprod. 1998;58:492–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yin Y, Stahl BC, DeWolf WC, Morgentaler A. P53 and Fas are sequential mechanisms of testicular germ cell apoptosis. J Androl. 2002;23:64–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mu X, Liu Y, Collins LL, Kim E, Chang C. The p53/retinoblastoma-mediated repression of testicular orphan receptor-2 in the rhesus monkey with cryptorchidism. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:23877–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li W, Bao W, Ma J, Liu X, Xu R, Wang RA, et al. Metastasis tumor antigen 1 is involved in the resistance to heat stress-induced testicular apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:869–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu F, Xu ZL, Qian XJ, Qiu WY, Huang H. Expression of Hsf1, Hsf2, and Phlda1 in cells undergoing cryptorchid-induced apoptosis in rat testes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2011;78:283–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang Y, Liu C, Wang J, Li Q, Ping H, Gao S, et al. MiR-299-5p regulates apoptosis through autophagy in neurons and ameliorates cognitive capacity in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24566.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Li J, Liu B, Xue H, Zhou QQ, Peng L. miR-217 is a useful diagnostic biomarker and regulates human podocyte cells apoptosis via targeting tnfsf11 in membranous nephropathy. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2168767.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Luo J, Han J, Li Y, Liu Y. Downregulated SOX9 mediated by miR-206 promoted cell apoptosis in Legg-calve-Perthes disease. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:1319–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement