Skip to main content
Download PDF

Males with low serum levels of vitamin D have lower pregnancy rates when ovulation induction and timed intercourse are used as a treatment for infertile couples: results from a pilot study

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 13, Article number: 127 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D (Vit D) is important for the regulation of reproductive physiology. In humans, maternal Vit D deficiency has been implicated in several reproductive- and pregnancy-related disorders. Very few data are available regarding the Vit D status in male partners of couples attempting pregnancy. This observational study (IRB Prot. N. 078/13) aimed to evaluate whether low Vit D serum levels in males might decrease the rate of successful conception in couples attempting pregnancy.

Methods

Male and female partners of infertile couples (n = 102) were classified into 2 GROUPS according to normal (≥30 ng/ml) or low (below 30 ng/ml) serum Vit D levels in male partners. Semen analysis was performed in each male participant based on the WHO reference criteria. The female partners of both groups were subjected to 3 consecutive cycles of gonadotropin-induced mono-ovulation. The main outcome measures included the clinical pregnancy rate, delivery per patient and per cycle, and miscarriage rate between the 2 groups evaluated at the end of the three-month period of the study.

Results

In male partners of both groups, standard semen analysis did not highlight substantial differences in sperm concentration, sperm progressive motility, or typical form. The pregnancy rates per patient and per cycle and delivery rates per patient and per cycle were all significantly higher (p< 0.05) in couples with normal Vit D levels.

Conclusions

These results suggest the existence of a relationship between male Vit D serum levels and semen ability to begin a pregnancy during cycles of timed vaginal intercourse.

Background

The steroid hormone 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (Vitamin D (25(OH)D; Vit D)) has been recognized for its relevance to bone health and calcium homeostasis. In recent years, a number of experimental, observational and interventional studies have acknowledged the preventative role played by Vit D in physiological non-skeletal functions [1, 2]. Vit D deficiency (25(OH)D: <20 ng/mL) and insufficiency (25(OH)D: 20–29 ng/mL) are associated with skeletal diseases such as rickets, osteomalacia, osteoporosis and with chronic illnesses including autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis or type 1 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn’s disease, infections, especially of the upper respiratory tract, cardiovascular disturbances including hypertension, coronary artery disease, and heart failure, cancer such as colon and breast cancer, or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and neurocognitive disorders, such as Alzheimer disease [3–6].

In addition to genetic predisposition [7], Vit D deficiency often results from inadequate dietary intake or insufficient cutaneous production [8]. In humans, the predominant source of Vit D is represented by the endogenous cutaneous synthesis, and dietary sources contribute to less than 20 % of the circulating levels of Vit D [9]. In the dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes, the endogenous synthesis of Vit D occurs after photolytic conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol (7(OH)D) by the ultraviolet B component of sunlight [10]. Subsequently, 7(OH)D is hydroxylated to 25(OH)D3 in the liver and is finally transformed to the active form of the vitamin, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), in the kidney and in other target tissues [11, 12]. Active 1,25(OH)2D exerts genomic and non-genomic actions via its cognate nuclear receptors [13]. Typically, in subjects exposed to upwards of 300 h of sunshine per month, serum levels of 25(OH)D increase to the range of 35 ng/mL [14]. However, because the half-life of 25(OH)D is approximately 2–3 weeks [15], serum levels decline below the desired values of 30 ng/mL within 1–2 months when sunlight could no longer produce any vitamin D in the skin. This decline might be particularly relevant in the North European population. An ongoing clinical trial is evaluating the effects of Vit D supplementation in infertile Danish men [16]. In addition to latitude, several other factors including environmental pollution and increasing concerns about the carcinogenic potential of sunlight and subsequent increased use of sunscreen are recognized contributors to Vit D insufficiency [17], which has become a worldwide health issue [18–20]. Thus, even in a Mediterranean country, levels of Vit D might frequently decline below desired levels, especially during the winter [21].

The regulatory role of Vit D in reproductive physiology is highlighted by the expression of vitamin D receptors (VDR) and enzymes that metabolize Vit D in the ovary, uterus, and placenta and in the testis, male reproductive tract and human spermatozoa [22, 23]. The phenotype of the Tokio strain of mice with a disrupted VDR binding domain (Vdr −/−) is characterized by severely impaired fertility and histological abnormalities of the gonads from both sexes [24]. The importance of Vit D for male reproduction has been demonstrated in rodents by studies reporting that Vit D deficiency leads to reduced sperm counts, impaired sperm motility and lower fertility rates in females inseminated with semen from Vit D deficient males [25, 26]. In humans, the VDR and all the Vit D metabolizing enzymes are co-expressed during the late stages of spermatogenesis in the neck of mature spermatozoa [27]. It is likely that optimal sperm function might be influenced by Vit D directly or indirectly through Vit D-related calcium homeostasis [28]. Although a role for calcium in the maturation of human spermatozoa is supported by the 2–3-fold higher calcium concentration in the epididymal and prostate fluid compared with serum [29], the precise effects of Vit D on human sperm motility and vitality remains unclear. Based on the observations outlined above, it is plausible that Vit D deficiency might worsen the quality of sperm and significantly reduce its fertilizing capacity. The Vit D status in humans is measured by serum levels of 25(OH)D, and serum values below 30 ng/ml indicate Vit D insufficiency [30, 31].

This observational, pilot study was planned to evaluate whether Vit D levels might play a role on reproductive outcomes and whether low Vit D serum levels in males living in a Mediterranean country might decrease the rate of successful conception in couples attempting pregnancy.

Methods

All procedures were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration on Human Experimentation and were approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Prot. N 078/13). One hundred and two (102) young couples reporting at least 1 year of sexual intercourse without the use of any contraceptive method were selected for the study between January 2014 and October 2014; all couples were accessing our academically affiliated private infertility center. Each eligible participant received a detailed explanation regarding the significance of an observational study evaluating the role of low/insufficient levels of Vit D in male partners on the rate of successful pregnancy. The subjects consenting to be enrolled and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were asked to sign a written informed consent. The study was carried out from November 2014 to January 2015.

In women, the ages ranged from 23 to 35 years (29.7 ± 2.6 years) and the infertility period ranged from 12 to 36 months (28.8 ± 3.5 months). All female patients had normal glucose tolerance according to the American Diabetes Association recommendations [32] and normal markers of thyroid, liver, and kidney function; none of the subjects were observing a specific diet or had been taking oral contraceptives or other long-term drugs in the 6 months preceding the beginning of the study. In all women, the endocrine profile was normal, according to values of the following hormones measured on day 3 of the cycle: for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), the serum levels were <10 mUI/ml; prolactin levels were <15 ng/mL, and testosterone levels were <0.6 ng/mL. In all cases, progesterone (P) levels in the mid-luteal phase were higher than 6 ng/mL. All women had appropriate late luteal phase endometrial biopsies, normal cervical mucus, and bilateral tubal patency. The body mass index (weight/height2, expressed as kg/m2), plasma estrogen levels, and follicle diameter were recorded on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. All hormone determinations were performed with appropriate commercial kits (Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc, Webster, Tex); intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were less than 10 %.

Serum Vit D levels were assessed in men and women by measuring serum 25(OH)D levels by a chemiluminescence immunoassay (Liaison Assay; Diasorin; Se: 4; CV%: 4.8 %–5.5 %). This assay accurately quantifies the sum of 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2. Female patients whose Vit D levels were considered in the range of insufficiency (25(OH)D: 20–29 ng/ml) were given exogenous Vit D to obtain values higher than 30 ng/ml before the beginning of study, and their Vit D values were maintained in the control range throughout the study. Couples enrolled in this study were classified into 2 groups according to the Vit D values of the male partners. The male partners in couples of GROUP 1 - Normal VD (n = 39) had normal Vit D levels (≥30 ng/ml); the male partners in couples of GROUP 2 – Low VD (n = 63) had Vit D levels below 30 ng/ml. Couples were excluded if either the male or female partners were subjected to treatments interfering with Vit D metabolism. The male participants from both groups were advised not to change their diets during the period of the study. Men with diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, or inflammatory bowel disease were not included in the study.

Among the male partner participants, seminal plasma from the ejaculate was obtained by voluntary masturbation after 3 days of sexual abstinence. Samples collected into a sterile container were allowed to liquefy for 30 min at room temperature before being analyzed according to standard World Health Organization (WHO) protocols [33, 34]. Standard semen analysis was performed by two experienced technicians operating under an active quality control program.

In both groups, the female partners were subjected to 3 consecutive cycles of gonadotropin-induced mono-ovulation under ultrasound monitoring, followed by follicular-timed vaginal intercourse. Three consecutive cycles of treatment were evaluated to prevent carryover effects of repeated ovarian stimulations [35]. Ovarian stimulation was performed with recombinant FSH (hrFSH, follitropin beta; Puregon, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) starting at a daily dose of 50–100 IU on the third day of the cycle. Transvaginal ultrasound examinations were repeated every other day from the 5th day of treatment until the mean diameter of the dominant follicle measured 14 mm; thereafter, transvaginal ultrasounds were performed daily. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; 10.000 IU; Gonasi IBSA, Rome, Italy) was administered when the mean diameter of the follicles reached 18 mm. Vaginal intercourse was suggested during the 30–36 h following hCG administration.

Main outcome measures

The main outcome measures included the clinical pregnancy rate, delivery per patient and per cycle, and miscarriage rate between the 2 groups evaluated at the end of the three month period of the study. For the purpose of this study, the overall number of clinical pregnancies was calculated. Clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of either an embryonic heart beat on transvaginal ultrasonography or the presence of a trophoblast at histologic evaluation after spontaneous abortion.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Statistica software from StatSoft (Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). Differences in baseline characteristics, clinical pregnancy rate, delivery per patient and per cycle, and miscarriage rate between the 2 groups were evaluated with Pearson’s χ 2 test with Yates’ continuity correction and Fisher’s exact test. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise specified. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The 102 couples enrolled in this study were classified into 2 groups according to serum Vit D levels in male partners; 39 couples were assigned to GROUP 1 – Normal Vit D (≥30 ng/ml), and 63 couples were assigned to GROUP 2 – Low Vit D (<30 ng/ml). During the three month period of the study, 12 couples (3 in GROUP 1 and 9 in GROUP 2) failed to complete the 3 consecutive cycles of treatment and were excluded from the study. In total, 90 out of 102 couples (36 in GROUP 1 and 54 in GROUP 2) completed the study.

There were no substantial differences in the physiological parameters or biochemical markers of the male partners from the two groups (Table 1). Although the serum Vit D levels were significantly lower in the male patients of GROUP 2 compared with GROUP 1 (P < 0.001), no substantial difference was observed in the sperm concentration, sperm progressive motility, or typical form percent in samples from the subjects of GROUP 1 compared with subjects of GROUP 2 (Table 2).

Table 1 Characteristics of male partners in the 2 groups
Full size table
Table 2 Standard characteristics of semen in the 2 groupsa
Full size table

The main characteristics of the female partners in GROUP 1 and GROUP 2 are summarized in Table 3. The age, duration of infertility, BMI, plasma estrogen level, and follicle diameter on hCG day of administration were similar in women from both groups. Among the 90 couples recruited, 108 cycles of timed vaginal intercourse were performed in GROUP 1, and 162 cycles were performed in GROUP 2. Differences in clinical pregnancies, pregnancy rates per patient and per cycle, delivery rates per patient and per cycle, numbers of miscarriages and miscarriage rates are reported in Table 4. All parameters evaluating pregnancy and delivery were significantly higher in couples with normal serum levels of Vit D (GROUP 1) than in couples with low Vit D levels (GROUP 2). A tendency towards a higher rate of miscarriage was observed in subjects of GROUP 2; although the miscarriage rate was higher in GROUP 2 than in GROUP 1, this parameter did not reach statistical significance (p> 0.23). No hyperstimulation or ectopic pregnancies occurred in either group.

Table 3 Characteristics of female partners in the 2 groupsa
Full size table
Table 4 Number of total cycles and pregnancy rate per patient and per cycle in the 2 groupsa
Full size table

Discussion

Human infertility is defined as the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after twelve months of regular, contraceptive-free sexual intercourse [36]. All couples recruited in this study did not attain pregnancy despite the lack of use of any contraceptive method during the last year of sexual intercourse. Twelve months is the lower reference limit for Time To Pregnancy (TTP), and TTP is a good indicator of fertility potential because it depends on regular ovulation, oocyte quality, and semen quality variables [37].

To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the correlation between serum Vit D levels in men and pregnancy rates in their female partners undergoing mono-ovulation induction and timed intercourse. The existing literature supports a solid role of Vit D for the regulation of reproductive physiology in male and female animal models [23, 38]. In humans, maternal Vit D deficiency has been implicated in several reproductive- and pregnancy-related disorders, ranging from PCOS to premature birth [39, 40]. Very few data are available regarding the Vit D status in male partners of couples attempting pregnancy [41].

To investigate whether male hypovitaminosis D might be a discriminating factor for successful pregnancy, the female partners of all couples in this study underwent identical procedures. The beneficial effects of ovulation induction in terms of improved oocyte quality, improved timing of the ovulatory period, and correction of slight and unknown ovulatory disorders have long been demonstrated [42, 43]. In female partners, we adopted a stimulation protocol with low doses of gonadotropin to obtain a cohort of mono-ovulatory patients that was as homogeneous as possible; in both groups, no cases of multiple pregnancies or hyperstimulation were observed. In the women of GROUP 1 and GROUP 2, the Vit D levels were in the control range (>30 ng/ml) for the duration of the study. Furthermore, the female patients assigned to GROUP 1 or GROUP 2 had comparable age distributions, estrogen plasma levels, numbers of rFSH ampoules used, and days of therapy (data not shown). Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that the oocytes in the women of the two groups were of comparable quality.

In the male partners of GROUP 1 and GROUP 2, standard semen analysis did not highlight substantial differences in sperm concentration, sperm progressive motility, or typical form. This observation might have several explanations. First, routine semen analysis itself has its own limitations, and does not account for putative sperm dysfunctions such as immature chromatin or fragmented DNA. In addition, semen components might be influenced by several other factors, such as sexual activity and accessory sex gland function. If anything, this finding confirms the poor predictive significance of semen analysis in terms of fertility potential.

Because the pregnancy rates per patient and per cycle were appreciably higher in couples of GROUP 1 (male partners with normal Vit D serum levels), the assumption that the worse prognosis of successful pregnancy is in couples whose male partners have low Vit D levels appears clear.

The results obtained in this study are in agreement with data supporting the relevance of Vit D in the regulation of male reproductive physiology. For example, the VDR has been shown to be present in the hypothalamic–pituitary axis, the testis and on the head/nucleus of the sperm and mid-piece [23, 44]. Although the exact role of the VDR in the sperm nucleus is unclear, it has been suggested to acts as a protective genomic factor because it is important for the proper control of sperm DNA integrity and the maintenance of genome stability [22].

Enzymes responsible for active Vit D conversion have been found in male reproductive tissues, and locally produced Vit D appears to modulate cholesterol efflux in human sperm, affect tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation of sperm proteins and increase sperm viability [45]. By increasing intracellular calcium concentrations, sperm motility and acrosin activity within the female reproductive tract, tissue-specific production of Vit D might significantly contribute to overall fertilizing capacity. The increased embryonic loss observed in couples whose male partners had low serum Vit D levels is consistent with this hypothesis.

Some limitations should be taken into account when considering the results. First, the small sample size of this observational, pilot study might not accurately address the contributions of other potential confounding factors to involuntary male infertility. However, the physiological and biochemical parameters related to the most well-known variables involved in male fertility (BMI, blood pressure, smoking habits, blood glucose profile) did not differ between the men of the two groups. Second, this study was carried out during the winter months, when Vit D levels are known to be the lowest. This period was purposely selected to stress the potential relevance of male Vit D insufficiency to fertilizing capacity in a Mediterranean population. Nevertheless, seasonal differences might be relevant to serum levels of Vit D, and this aspect should be adequately considered in further studies. Third, our study does not directly address the specific mechanisms by which Vit D is involved in reproduction, although some hypotheses could be suggested. For example, it is possible that insufficient Vit D levels in males might decrease protection from inflammatory signaling and oxidative stress in spermatozoa, as demonstrated in several other cell types [46–48]. This insufficiency might affect the functional integrity of the spermatozoa, therefore reducing sperm fertility potential by causing implantation disorders, rather than fertilization problems. Supernumerary defective spermatozoa could damage the oocyte or pro-nucleate embryo by altering the physical-chemical properties of the zona pellucida via the release of toxic metabolites such as oxygen radicals [49]. Subtle abnormalities in defective Vit D spermatozoa might lead to subsequent abnormal membrane function in the embryo and anomalies in the cell-to-cell communication/binding that appear to have an important role in the attachment of the blastocyst and penetration of surface epithelium of the endometrium [50]. Further support for this hypothesis comes from human studies indicating that paternally derived proteins are expressed in the embryo at the pre-implantation stage [51]. An additional mechanism that might help explain the relationship between sperm abnormalities and poor pregnancy outcomes is a desynchronization between slower embryonic development and the uterine environment [52]. According to this view, it is plausible that defective spermatozoa could lead to a less viable embryo, and therefore to a low viable pregnancy rate with a high miscarriage rate. Consistent with this hypothesis, a tendency towards a higher rate of miscarriage was observed in the couples of GROUP 2 in our study.

Conclusions

Taken together, the results from our pilot study suggest the existence of a direct relationship between male Vit D serum levels and semen ability to begin a pregnancy during cycles of timed vaginal intercourse. Further studies are required to elucidate the pathophysiology of this condition and its relationship to overall male fertility. Given its recognized safety, accessibility and ease of administration, the evaluation of Vit D levels and subsequent Vit D supplementation in male individuals with serum levels below the normal range could represent a cost effective strategy to improve the chances of clinical pregnancy for couples undergoing mono-ovulation induction and timed intercourse.

References

  1. 1.

    Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266–81.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Holick MF. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: a forgotten hormone important for health. Public Health Rev. 2010;32:267–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wacker M, Holick MF. Vitamin D - effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation. Nutrients. 2013;5(1):111–48.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zheng Y, Zhu J, Zhou M, Cui L, Yao W, Liu Y. Meta-analysis of long-term vitamin D supplementation on overall mortality. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82109.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Littlejohns TJ, Henley WE, Lang IA, Annweiler C, Beauchet O, Chaves PH, et al. Vitamin D and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2014;83(10):920–8.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Grober U, Reichrath J, Holick MF. Live longer with vitamin D? Nutrients. 2015;7(3):1871–80.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang TJ, Zhang F, Richards JB, Kestenbaum B, van Meurs JB, Berry D, et al. Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2010;376(9736):180–8.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Holick MF, Chen TC. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(4):1080S–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lips P. Vitamin D physiology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006;92(1):4–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ashwell M, Stone EM, Stolte H, Cashman KD, Macdonald H, Lanham-New S, et al. UK Food Standards Agency Workshop Report: an investigation of the relative contributions of diet and sunlight to vitamin D status. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(4):603–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    DeLuca HF. The kidney as an endocrine organ for the production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3, a calcium-mobilizing hormone. N Engl J Med. 1973;289(7):359–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bouillon R, Okamura WH, Norman AW. Structure-function relationships in the vitamin D endocrine system. Endocr Rev. 1995;16(2):200–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Haussler MR, Whitfield GK, Haussler CA, Hsieh JC, Thompson PD, Selznick SH, et al. The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(3):325–49.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brot C, Vestergaard P, Kolthoff N, Gram J, Hermann AP, Sorensen OH. Vitamin D status and its adequacy in healthy Danish perimenopausal women: relationships to dietary intake, sun exposure and serum parathyroid hormone. Br J Nutr. 2001;86 Suppl 1:S97–103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vieth R. Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(5):842–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    NCT01304927 CgI. Vitamin D Supplementation and Male Infertility: The Copenhagen Bone-Gonadal Study a Double Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. 2011. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

  17. 17.

    Diehl JW, Chiu MW. Effects of ambient sunlight and photoprotection on vitamin D status. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23(1):48–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Looker AC, Pfeiffer CM, Lacher DA, Schleicher RL, Picciano MF, Yetley EA. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of the US population: 1988–1994 compared with 2000–2004. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(6):1519–27.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mithal A, Wahl DA, Bonjour JP, Burckhardt P, Dawson-Hughes B, Eisman JA, et al. Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(11):1807–20.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Spiro A, Buttriss JL. Vitamin D: an overview of vitamin D status and intake in Europe. Nutr Bull. 2014;39(4):322–50.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lippi G, Nouvenne A, Ticinesi A, Bonelli P, Salvagno GL, Cervellin G, et al. The burden of vitamin D deficiency in a Mediterranean country without a policy of food fortification. Acta Biomed. 2015;86(1):59–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Corbett ST, Hill O, Nangia AK. Vitamin D receptor found in human sperm. Urology. 2006;68(6):1345–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Luk J, Torrealday S, Neal Perry G, Pal L. Relevance of vitamin D in reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(10):3015–27.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yoshizawa T, Handa Y, Uematsu Y, Takeda S, Sekine K, Yoshihara Y, et al. Mice lacking the vitamin D receptor exhibit impaired bone formation, uterine hypoplasia and growth retardation after weaning. Nat Genet. 1997;16(4):391–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kwiecinski GG, Petrie GI, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D is necessary for reproductive functions of the male rat. J Nutr. 1989;119(5):741–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sun W, Chen L, Zhang W, Wang R, Goltzman D, Miao D. Active vitamin D deficiency mediated by extracellular calcium and phosphorus results in male infertility in young mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308(1):E51–62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nangia AK, Hill O, Waterman MD, Schwender CE, Memoli V. Testicular maturation arrest to testis cancer: spectrum of expression of the vitamin D receptor and vitamin D treatment in vitro. J Urol. 2007;178(3 Pt 1):1092–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Blomberg Jensen M. Vitamin D and male reproduction. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(3):175–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bouillon R, Carmeliet G, Verlinden L, van Etten E, Verstuyf A, Luderer HF, et al. Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev. 2008;29(6):726–76.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Heaney RP, Holick MF. Why the IOM recommendations for vitamin D are deficient. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(3):455–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911–30.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Committee ADAA-PP. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2015: summary of revisions and position statement. Diabetes Care. 2015;38 Suppl 1:S1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Organization WH. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research; 2010. p. 1–287.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(3):231–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Melis GB, Paoletti AM, Strigini F, Menchini Fabris F, Canale D, Fioretti P. Pharmacologic induction of multiple follicular development improves the success rate of artificial insemination with husband’s semen in couples with male-related or unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(3):441–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    (WHO) WHO. Infertility. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bonde JP, Ernst E, Jensen TK, Hjollund NH, Kolstad H, Henriksen TB, et al. Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet. 1998;352(9135):1172–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sun W, Xie H, Ji J, Zhou X, Goltzman D, Miao D. Defective female reproductive function in 1,25(OH)2D-deficient mice results from indirect effect mediated by extracellular calcium and/or phosphorus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;299(6):E928–35.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pal L, Berry A, Coraluzzi L, Kustan E, Danton C, Shaw J, et al. Therapeutic implications of vitamin D and calcium in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28(12):965–8.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fischer D, Schroer A, Ludders D, Cordes T, Bucker B, Reichrath J, et al. Metabolism of vitamin D3 in the placental tissue of normal and preeclampsia complicated pregnancies and premature births. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2007;34(2):80–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vanni VS, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Papaleo E, Paffoni A, Pagliardini L, et al. Vitamin D and assisted reproduction technologies: current concepts. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:47.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Melis GB, Strigini F, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Olivieri L, Antinori D, et al. Critical reappraisal of the clinical effectiveness of different methods of assisted fertilization. J Endocrinol Invest. 1990;13(3):263–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mascarenhas L, Khastgir G, Davies WA, Lee S. Superovulation and timed intercourse: can it provide a reasonable alternative for those unable to afford assisted conception? Hum Reprod. 1994;9(1):67–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Aquila S, Guido C, Perrotta I, Tripepi S, Nastro A, Ando S. Human sperm anatomy: ultrastructural localization of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D receptor and its possible role in the human male gamete. J Anat. 2008;213(5):555–64.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Aquila S, Guido C, Middea E, Perrotta I, Bruno R, Pellegrino M, et al. Human male gamete endocrinology: 1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) regulates different aspects of human sperm biology and metabolism. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:140.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hamden K, Carreau S, Jamoussi K, Miladi S, Lajmi S, Aloulou D, et al. 1Alpha,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3: therapeutic and preventive effects against oxidative stress, hepatic, pancreatic and renal injury in alloxan-induced diabetes in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2009;55(3):215–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Polidoro L, Properzi G, Marampon F, Gravina GL, Festuccia C, Di Cesare E, et al. Vitamin D protects human endothelial cells from H(2)O(2) oxidant injury through the Mek/Erk-Sirt1 axis activation. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6(2):221–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Asemi Z, Samimi M, Tabassi Z, Shakeri H, Esmaillzadeh A. Vitamin D supplementation affects serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, insulin resistance, and biomarkers of oxidative stress in pregnant women. J Nutr. 2013;143(9):1432–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Check JH, Katsoff D, Check ML. Some semen abnormalities may cause infertility by impairing implantation rather than fertilization. Med Hypotheses. 2001;56(5):653–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Denker HW. Implantation: a cell biological paradox. J Exp Zool. 1993;266(6):541–58.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Daniels R, Kinis T, Serhal P, Monk M. Expression of the myotonin protein kinase gene in preimplantation human embryos. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4(3):389–93.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Howarth B, Alliston CW, Ulberg LC. Importance of uterine environment on rabbit sperm prior to fertilization. J Anim Sci. 1965;24:1027–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The manuscript revised for language correction by a distinguished professional service.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Massimo Tartagni, Maria A. De Salvia, Giuseppe Loverro & Monica Montagnani

  2. University Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, Viale Pinto, 71100, Foggia, Italy

    Maria Matteo

  3. Centro di Fecondazione Medicalmente Assistita MoMò Fertilife, Bisceglie, Italy

    Domenico Baldini, Mario V. Tartagni & Hala Alrasheed

Authors
  1. Massimo Tartagni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Matteo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Domenico Baldini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario V. Tartagni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hala Alrasheed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria A. De Salvia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Giuseppe Loverro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Monica Montagnani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Montagnani.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This work was supported by a research grant award (PRIN 2010YK7Z5K_008) to M.M.

Authors’ contributions

MT designed the study, supervised the research and wrote the draft; MM, MVT, DB, HA, and GL performed the research; MT and MAD analyzed the data; MM contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data and to writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tartagni, M., Matteo, M., Baldini, D. et al. Males with low serum levels of vitamin D have lower pregnancy rates when ovulation induction and timed intercourse are used as a treatment for infertile couples: results from a pilot study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13, 127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0126-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Vitamin D
  • Hypovitaminosis D
  • Male infertility
  • Pregnancy rate

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us