Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pesticide exposure: the hormonal function of the female reproductive system disrupted?

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 4, Article number: 30 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Some pesticides may interfere with the female hormonal function, which may lead to negative effects on the reproductive system through disruption of the hormonal balance necessary for proper functioning. Previous studies primarily focused on interference with the estrogen and/or androgen receptor, but the hormonal function may be disrupted in many more ways through pesticide exposure. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the various ways in which pesticides may disrupt the hormonal function of the female reproductive system and in particular the ovarian cycle. Disruption can occur in all stages of hormonal regulation: 1. hormone synthesis; 2. hormone release and storage; 3. hormone transport and clearance; 4. hormone receptor recognition and binding; 5. hormone postreceptor activation; 6. the thyroid function; and 7. the central nervous system. These mechanisms are described for effects of pesticide exposure in vitro and on experimental animals in vivo. For the latter, potential effects of endocrine disrupting pesticides on the female reproductive system, i.e. modulation of hormone concentrations, ovarian cycle irregularities, and impaired fertility, are also reviewed. In epidemiological studies, exposure to pesticides has been associated with menstrual cycle disturbances, reduced fertility, prolonged time-to-pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, stillbirths, and developmental defects, which may or may not be due to disruption of the female hormonal function. Because pesticides comprise a large number of distinct substances with dissimilar structures and diverse toxicity, it is most likely that several of the above-mentioned mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiological pathways explaining the role of pesticide exposure in ovarian cycle disturbances, ultimately leading to fertility problems and other reproductive effects. In future research, information on the ways in which pesticides may disrupt the hormonal function as described in this review, can be used to generate specific hypotheses for studies on the effects of pesticides on the ovarian cycle, both in toxicological and epidemiological settings.

Review

Although a substantial amount of research has been conducted to associate occupational exposure to pesticides with fertility problems in men [1–4], studies among women are scarce. One reason may be that exposure to pesticides is higher among men, because men usually apply pesticides whereas women get exposed through re-entry activities only. Another reason may be that fertility in women is more difficult to assess than fertility in men. The ovarian cycle has not been as fully explored as the spermatogenesis in men. Ovarian disorders can be caused by a large variety of factors, such as high levels of physical activity, age, stress, smoking, and caffeine use [5–7]. In addition, exposure to chemicals such as benzene and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can affect the menstrual cycle [8, 9]. There are also indications that exposure to particular pesticides may induce ovarian dysfunction. Recently, Farr et al. examined the association between pesticide exposure and menstrual cycle characteristics [10]. They observed that women who worked with pesticides suspected of being hormonally active had a 60–100% increased odds of experiencing long cycles, missed periods, and intermenstrual bleeding compared with women who had never worked with pesticides. In two studies on time-to-pregnancy among female greenhouse workers [11, 12], the authors concluded that female workers in flower greenhouses may have reduced fecundability and that exposure to pesticides may be part of the causal chain. In one other study, an increased risk of infertility was observed among women exposed to pesticides or working in industries associated with agriculture [13, 14].

Some pesticides may interfere with the female hormonal function and thereby cause negative effects on the reproductive system. Most previous studies focused on interference with the estrogen and/or androgen receptor, but the hormonal function can be disrupted in many more ways through pesticide exposure. The aim of the present review is to give an overview of the various ways in which pesticides may disrupt the hormonal function of the female reproductive system and in particular the ovarian cycle. As adequate exposure assessment studies in humans are scarce for most pesticides, this review will not provide information on dose-response relations nor does it pretend to discuss risk assessment.

Female fertility

Subfertility is defined as the inability to conceive within 12 months of regular, unprotected sexual intercourse and affects about 10 – 15% of all couples in the Western world [15]. A World Health Organization (WHO) multi-centre study revealed that the problem was predominantly male in 20% of subfertile couples and predominantly female in 38% of the cases, whereas 27% showed abnormalities in both man and woman and no evident cause of subfertility was identified in the remaining 15% [16]. Five types of subfertility disorders are distinguished [17].

1. Male subfertility

Low sperm concentration, reduced motility and/or abnormal morphology of sperm are the dominant causes of subfertility in 20 – 25% of couples [18–20]. Male subfertility is generally expressed as a reduced ability of the female partner to become pregnant.

2. Ovulation disturbances

Problems with ovulation account for subfertility in another 20 – 25% of couples and is thereby a frequent cause of subfertility in women [18]. Ovulation problems present themselves as irregular or absent menstrual periods and can be substantiated through measurement of reproductive hormones.

3. Defects in spermatozoa-cervical mucus interaction

Abnormal cervical mucus may prevent the sperm from reaching the oocyte. Some authors estimate that cervical hostility is a cause of subfertility in 10 – 15% of couples [18, 19], whereas others deny its mere existence [20].

4. Tuboperitoneal disorders

Tubal damage and/or obstruction, hydrosalpinx, pelvic adhesions, and endometriosis are the main cause of subfertility in 10 – 30% of couples [18]. In many instances, these problems originate from infections.

5. Unexplained subfertility

Despite advances in the diagnosis of causes of subfertility, inability to conceive remains unexplained in 25 – 30% of fully investigated couples [18–20].

An important factor in female subfertility is age. The risk of subfertility increases from 10% to 30% when women are over 35 years of age. This is of particular importance nowadays, as an increasing number of women delay pregnancy until the age when natural female fertility is in decline, due to a higher number of chromosomal aberrations in the oocytes. Hormonal balance is another important factor in female fertility, in particular regarding the ovarian cycle. Lifestyle factors, including stress, extreme body weight (too low or too high), coffee consumption, diet, and excessive exercise can affect a woman's hormonal balance and subsequent ovulatory pattern. Hormonal imbalance and ovulatory problems are much less often caused by hormonal diseases, such as pituitary gland tumors. But there are indications that endocrine disrupting chemicals, such as PCBs and certain pesticides, can influence the hormonal balance and thus increase the risk of subfertility [21]. In this review, we will elaborate on hormonal function disturbances associated with pesticide exposure.

Pesticides

Pesticides are used in agriculture and public health to control insects, weeds, animals, and vectors of disease. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) defined a pesticide as 'any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying or controlling any pest, including vectors of human or animal disease, unwanted species of plants or animals causing harm or otherwise interfering with the production, processing, storage, transport, or marketing of food, agricultural commodities, wood, wood products or animal feedstuffs, or which may be administered to animals for the control of insects, mites/spider mites or other pests in or on their bodies' [22]. Next to these intended effects, pesticides may also have adverse health effects for human beings. The main adverse health effects are difficulty in breathing, headaches, neurological or psychological effects, irritation of skin and mucous membranes, skin disorders, effects on the immune system, cancer, and reproductive effects. The manifestation of these effects depends on the type of pesticide and on level and duration of exposure. In this review, we will only focus on potential reproductive effects of pesticide exposure. Pesticides may cause reproductive toxicity through several different mechanisms: direct damage to the structure of cells, interference with biochemical processes necessary for normal cell function, and biotransformation resulting in toxic metabolites (see Figure 1). Reproductive effects that have been associated with pesticide exposure in women are decreased fertility, spontaneous abortions, stillbirth, premature birth, low birth weight, developmental abnormalities, ovarian disorders, and disruption of the hormonal function [23, 24]. Pesticides that may disrupt the hormonal function are often called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), just like other agents with similar mechanisms of action. An ECD may be defined as an exogenous agent that interferes with the synthesis, secretion, transport, binding, action, or elimination of natural hormones in the body that are responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis, reproduction, development and/or behaviour [21, 25]. Endocrine disruptors are usually either natural products or synthetic chemicals that mimic, enhance (agonists), or inhibit (antagonists) the action of endogenous hormones [25]. Body burden, dose, timing, and duration of exposure at critical periods in life are important considerations for assessing the risk of an adverse effect of endocrine disruptors. In the next paragraphs, we will review the ways in which pesticides may disrupt the female hormonal function of the reproductive system on the basis of experimental animal studies (in vivo) and cell culture studies (in vitro), which often provide the first indications of potential reproductive effects (see Table 1). We only describe possible mechanisms of disruption mentioned in the literature to indicate hazards, without judgement about human risks based on dose-response relations.

Figure 1
figure 1

Potential effects of pesticides on female reproduction.

Full size image
Table 1 Pesticides with known or suspected endocrine disrupting properties, mechanisms and effects on the female reproductive system in experimental animals
Full size table

Disruption of the female hormonal function

1. Interference with hormone synthesis

All hormones differ in their chemical structure and have a different route of synthesis with innumerable different steps. If one substance or link is disturbed in the chain of hormone synthesis, the hormone may not be produced or may get different properties. Some pesticides, such as fenarimol, prochloraz, and other imidazole fungicides possess the ability to inhibit estrogen biosynthesis through CYP19 aromatase inhibition in vitro [26–28], preventing the conversion of androgens to estrogens. Vinggaard et al. hypothesized that compounds which can inhibit aromatase acitivity in vitro may be able to cause local changes in estrogen and androgen concentrations in vivo [26]. Aromatase induction is a physiological mechanism to deactivate xenobiotics, which does not inevitably cause a toxic effect. The pesticides atrazine, simazine, and propazine (2-chloro-triazine herbicides) induce aromatase activity in vitro [29]. For p,p-DDE, the induction of aromatase has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo [30]. In addition, the pesticides methomyl, pirimicarb, propamocarb, and iprodion can weakly stimulate aromatase activity [31], whereas heptachlor may act as an inducer of testosterone 16-alpha and 16-beta hydroxylases [32].

Thiram, Sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate (SMD), and other dithiocarbamates are known to suppress the dopamine-beta-hydroxylase activity leading to reduced conversion of dopamine to norepinephrine [33–35]. This may lead to changes in hypothalamic catecholamine activity involved in generating the proestrus surge in LH, which stimulates the final stages of ovulation. Goldman et al. concluded that SMD is able to block the LH surge and ovulation in rats [33]. Ketaconazole inhibits various enzymes which belong to the CYP450-dependent monooxygenases and also inhibits progesterone synthesis [28, 36].

2. Interference with hormone storage and release

Interference with hormone storage and/or release is also mentioned in the definition of EDCs as a mechanism of action. Catecholamine hormones (e.g. norepinephrine) are stored in granular vesicles of chromomaffin cells within the adrenal medulla and within presynaptic terminals in the central nervous system. Therefore, they can be released quickly on demand. In contrast, steroid hormones are not stored intracellularly within secretory granules, but are readily synthesized after gonadotropin stimulation of the gonads.

The formamidine pesticides chlordimeform and amitraz have been reported to block norepinephrine binding to the alpha 2-andrenoreceptors [37]. Norepinephrine is critical for the preovulatory increase in the pulsatile release of GnRH and the subsequent ovulatory surge of LH [38]. Thiram suppresses the proestrus surge of LH and delays ovulation in the female rat [39]. Disruption in the timing of the LH surge could alter the viability and the quality of the oocyte [40] and a potential conceptus by pre-ovulatory over-ripeness ovopathy (PrOO) [41]. Inhibition of progesterone secretion and poor conception occurred after malathion exposure at the onset of estrus in cattle [42].

3. Interference with hormone transport and clearance

For the most part, steroid hormones in the bloodstream do not float around freely, but are bound to carrier proteins, such as SHBG and albumin. Because only free hormones can be biologically active, increases or decreases in the concentration of SHBG will have a major impact on the available and active steroid hormone concentrations in blood. Estrogens are known to increase the synthesis of SHBG in the liver and thus increase the SHBG concentration in plasma, whereas androgens decrease these concentrations [25, 43]. Substances that mimic these natural hormones may cause similar changes, but no specific papers dealing with effects of pesticides on SHBG levels have been found.

In contrast, reports are known about the influence of pesticides on clearance of steroid hormones, mostly occurring in the liver. The clearance rate is different for each hormone and is influenced by compounds that alter liver enzyme activity involved in hormone clearance. Many pesticides induce the liver enzymes monooxygenase and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase [44], resulting in increased clearance of the pesticide itself for detoxification purposes, but also of testosterone [45, 46]. For instance, DDT analogs are potent inducers of hepatic microsomal monooxygenase activity in vivo [47], which degrades endogenous androgens, resulting in suppressed androgen receptor mediated activity. These effects have also been suggested for endosulfan and mirex [48]. Similarly, treatment with lindane has been reported to increase the clearance of estrogens [49].

4. Interference with hormone receptor recognition and binding

This mechanism of endocrine disruption is much discussed in the literature. Hormones travel from their point of release in the bloodstream to particular tissues where they convey their messages. For the message to be interpreted, hormones bind to receptors. Hormone and receptor have a precise fit, so that only a specific type of hormone can bind to a specific receptor (see Figure 2) [23]. A number of environmental agents may alter this process by mimicking the natural hormone (agonists) or by inhibiting receptor binding (antagonists). The latter mechanism is based on complete or partial blocking of the specific receptor. Regarding the estrogen receptor, this mechanism only applies when the endocrine disruptor concentration is high, because the affinity of endocrine disruptors for the estrogen receptor is usually many times lower than that of 17-beta-estradiol. Three different mechanisms are elaborated below: 1. binding and activating the estrogen receptor; 2. binding without activating the estrogen receptor; and 3. binding other receptors.

Figure 2
figure 2

The natural hormone-receptor interaction and the mechanisms of action of hormone antagonists and hormone agonist. (From T. Schettler, Generations at Risk: How environmental Toxicants May Affect Reproductive Health in California, 1995 [23]).

Full size image

4.1 Binding and activating the estrogen receptor

When an endocrine disruptor or one of its metabolites bind and activate the estrogen receptor, the endocrine disruptor will imitate the hormone 17β-estradiol. The substance thus acts as an agonist and is called estrogenic. Possible effects may be decreased production of GnRH by the hypothalamus (negative feedback system) and of LH and FSH by the pituitary gland. As a result, the levels of LH and FSH will drop and finally lead to a lack of estradiol. Under normal circumstances, the hypothalamus will then be triggered to produce more GnRH, but this will be prevented by the endocrine disruptor. As a result, the hormonal cycle may be disrupted.

Several pesticides or their metabolites have been reported to possess estrogenicity in vivo, e.g. methoxychlor [50–53], kepone [54], and DDT [55–57] and/or in vitro, e.g. o,p'-DDT and p,p'-DDT [57], endosulfan [31, 58, 59], toxaphene [58–60], dieldrin [31, 59–61], fenarimol [31, 62], triadimefon [62], triadimenol [62], aldrin [55], endrin [55], methiocarb [31], pentachrophenol [63], nonylphenol [63], alachlor [64], fenvalerate [65], chlordecone [66], and sumithrin [65, 66]. Some pesticides are weakly estrogenic, but may act additively in combination of two or more pesticides. When mixed together they may induce estrogenic responses at concentrations lower than those required when each compound is administered alone [60].

4.2 Binding without activating the estrogen receptor

If an endocrine disruptor or its metabolites bind, but do not activate the estrogen receptor, the substance acts as an antagonist and inactivates the estrogen receptor, preventing estradiol to bind. As a result, the hypothalamus stimulates production of GnRH and the pituitary gland will produce more LH and FSH. The concentration of estradiol will also increase, but because the feedback mechanism is disrupted, GnRH will not decrease. Eventually, the estrogen receptors may become less sensitive through prolonged exposure to high concentrations of estrogen and/or endocrine disruptors.

The results of a study by Cooper et al. indicate that lindane may effectively block the response of estrogen-dependent tissues and that this apparent anti-estrogenic effect is responsible for the disturbances observed in the neuroendocrine control of ovarian function in rats [67]. Other studies also suggest that lindane is anti-estrogenic and is able to disrupt the estrus cycle [68, 69]. Atrazine, simazine, and diaminochlorotriazine expressed anti-estrogenic activity in uteri of female rats without expressing intrinsic estrogenic activity, but the precise mechanism is not known [70, 71].

4.3 Binding other receptors

The fungicide vinclozolin and two of its metabolites bind the androgen receptor and act as androgen receptor antagonists in vitro and in vivo [72–75]. Procymidone and DDT also express anti-androgenic activity [74, 76]. A paper by Kelce et al. presents consistent evidence that DDT and DDE compete with androgens for their receptors [66]. In addition, several studies suggest that the pesticides methoxychlor [74], linuron [74, 77], fenitrothion, and biphenol act as androgen antagonists in vitro and/or in vivo [74, 78–80]. The presence of a potent androgen antagonist in a sufficient internal dose may create an overall estrogenic effect. The pyrethroid insecticides fenvalerate and d-trans allethrin seem to antagonize the action of progesterone [65].

Some endocrine disruptors act through one of the above mechanisms, while others may cause their effects in several different ways. For instance, DDT was found to be estrogenic, but can also bind to the androgen receptor [63]. The pesticides dieldrin, endosulfan, methiocarb, and fenarimol are known as both estrogen agonists and androgen antagonist [31]. Prochloraz acts as estrogen and androgen antagonist [31]. Endosulfan and alachlor have been found to bind to the estrogen receptor as well as the progesterone receptor [81]. Kelce et al. showed that chlordecone binds rather efficiently to estrogen receptors while it may also bind to androgen receptors at higher concentrations [66]. Although the potencies of these pesticides to act as hormone agonist or antagonists are low compared to the natural ligands, the integrated response in the organism might be amplified by the ability of pesticides to act via several mechanisms and by frequent simultaneous exposure to different pesticides [31].

5. Interference with hormone postreceptor activation

If an agonist binds to its receptor, a cascade of events is initiated for the appropriate cellular response necessary for signal transduction across the membrane or, in case of nuclear receptors, the initiation of or alteration in DNA-transcription and protein synthesis [25]. Lindane has been demonstrated to decrease phosphatidylinositol turnover in the membrane and to reduce protein kinase-C activation [82]. Steroid hormone receptor activation may also be modified by indirect mechanisms such as a downregulation, which is seen after TCDD exposure [83, 84].

6. Interference with the thyroid function

Pesticides like chlorophenols, chlorophenoxy acids, organochlorines, and quinones have been shown to alter thyroid gland function and to reduce circulating thyroid hormone levels [85, 86]. Reduction in thyroid hormone levels can compromise the catalytic activity of hepatic cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, resulting in an altered hepatic androgen metabolism [87].

7. Interference with the central nervous system

The central nervous system (CNS) is very important in the integration of hormonal and behavioral activity. Disturbances in these finely tuned mechanisms can severely impair normal adaptive behavior and reproduction. Since many pesticides are known to be neurotoxic, it is conceivable that these chemicals can disrupt the coordinating activity of the CNS by disrupting brain cell functions [25]. Also, pesticides can alter the hypothalamic and pituitary function and thus secretion of GnRH, LH, and FSH in a more direct manner by modifying the feedback of endogenous hormones. For example, it has been demonstrated that low-dose exposure to o,p-DDT and methoxychlor can result in diminished hypothalamic and pituitary function in rodents [88, 89]. Finally, it is postulated that any environmental compound mimicking or antagonizing steroid hormone action could presumably alter the glycosylation of LH and FSH, thereby reducing their biological activity [90].

Potential effects of hormone disruption on the female reproductive system

The function of the female reproductive system depends upon hormone concentrations and their balance. Endocrine disruption may result in disturbances in the reproductive system, such as modulation of hormone concentrations, ovarian cycle irregularities, and impaired fertility [91], which may be due to any of the mechanisms mentioned above. In many studies addressing these disturbances, however, the mechanisms are not specified. These studies, describing the effects of endocrine disrupting pesticides on the female reproductive system in more general terms, are summarized below (see also Table 1). As the majority of these studies are experimental animal studies, one should keep in mind that the estrus cycle in animals only partly corresponds with the ovarian cycle in humans, but that the phases (proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus) are different. Estrus is the period of greatest female sexual responsiveness usually coinciding with ovulation. Diestrus is the luteal phase of the estrus cycle when the female is not receptive to the male and the progesterone levels are high.

Modulation of hormone concentrations

Hormonal balance, i.e. a proper level of sexual hormones, is important to preserve female reproduction and maintain fertility. This balance can be disturbed by changing levels of estrogen or progesterone. Estrogen levels may be decreased by several pesticides. Treatment of rats with the insecticide heptachlor suppressed estradiol concentrations in blood and reduced the production of estradiol by ovarian cells of treated rats [92, 93]. Lindane, atrazine, and simazine also cause a decrease in circulating estradiol levels in rats [94, 95]. In monkeys, ovulatory levels of estradiol were reduced after high doses of hexachlorobenzene [96], which also induced anovulatory cycles and suppression of circulating levels of estradiol [97], and a dose dependent suppression of serum progesterone concentrations during the luteal phase [98]. Progesterone levels may be decreased by exposure to methoxychlor as well, especially during the estrus phase of the estrus cycle in rats [99, 100]. During early pregnancy, progesterone concentrations decreased after treatment with DDT in rabbits [101].

Ovarian cycle irregularities

The female ovarian cycle is the result of a balanced cooperation between several organs and is determined by a complex interaction of hormones. Ovarian cycle irregularities include disturbances in the ovarian cycle (e.g. longer cycle, persistent estrus) and ovulation problems (deferred ovulation or anovulation).

Disturbances in the ovarian cycle

Organochlorine compounds are known to interrupt the estrus cycle in rats [102–104]. The number of estrus cycles and the duration of each phase of the estrus cycle were significantly affected after treatment of rats with methyl parathion [105, 106]. The pesticides dimethoate, malathion, and sumithion gave similar results[107, 108] Atrazine, an antagonist of the estradiol receptor, can alter the estrus cyclicity in rats and caused lengthening of the estrus cycle and an increase in the number of days in estrus [109–112]. Carbofuran effected the estrus cycle by showing a decrease in the number of estrus cycles and the duration of each phase [113], which may be due to a direct effect on the ovary or on the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis causing hormonal imbalance. The pesticide heptachlor may cause disrupted and prolonged estrus cycles [114]. Treatment with DDT and chlordecone resulted in persistent estrus in rats. Lindane induced marked disturbances in the estrus cycle, prolonging the proestrus phase considerably and thereby delaying ovulation [68, 69, 115]. The pesticides hexachlorobenzene, mancozeb, and 3,3',4,4'-tetrachloroazoxybenzene may also cause cycle irregularities, such as a decrease in the number of estrus cycles and an increase in the duration of diestrus [96, 98, 116, 117].

Ovulation problems

Endocrine disruptors with estrogenic properties may be able to block ovulation similar to contraceptive pills. The midcycle surge of LH from the pituitary gland provides the physiological trigger for the process of ovulation in the mammalian female. Any agent that compromises the LH surge could function as a reproductive toxicant [118]. Atrazine, for instance, can cause anovulation due to suppression of LH secretion [119]. The proestrus LH surge in rats was suppressed after treatment with chlordecone [103], whereas Muller et al. found that hexachlorobenzene can block ovulation in rhesus monkeys [97]. In this study, low estrogen levels were found during anovulatory cycles. The pesticides thiram and sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate may also inhibit ovulation in rats [33, 120].

Impaired fertility

Human fertility is a delicate process that can be influenced by many factors, such as hormonal imbalance caused by pesticides [121]. However, in most studies it is not clear whether impaired fertility is due to hormonal imbalance or to other toxic effects. Fenarimol was found to cause a dose-related decrease in fertility in rats [27]. Baliger et al. found a decrease in the number of healthy follicles and an increase in the number of atretic follicles in mancozeb treated rats [116]. Also, treatment with methoxychlor and chlordecone caused an increase in the number of atretic follicles. This indicates a potential reduction in fertility [102, 104]. A decrease in the number of healthy follicles was also seen after methyl parathion treatment [106]. Exposure to mancozeb and methyl parathion may lead to a decrease in uterus weight as well, which may affect implantation [106, 122]. Inhibition of implantation can be caused by mancozeb [122], methoxychlor [100], heptachlor [93], and chlordimeform [123]. Methoxychlor accelerates embryo transport rate in rats and induces preimplantation embryonic loss, perhaps due to this acceleration [124]. The insecticide lindane modifies sperm responsiveness to progesterone in vitro, a physiological effect of the acrosome reaction [125, 126], which could be a cause of infertility in women exposed to lindane. Female alligators from Lake Apopka polluted with dicofol and DDT exhibited abnormal ovarian morphology with large numbers of polyovular follicles and polynuclear oocytes [127]. Also, their estradiol levels were almost twice as high as in female alligators from a control lake. The investigators suggested that the gonads of juveniles from Lake Apopka were permanently modified in ovo, so that normal steroidogenesis is not possible and normal sexual maturation is unlikely.

Real-life risks of pesticide exposure on the female reproductive function?

The studies described in the previous paragraphs are mostly studies involving laboratory animals (in vivo) or cell cultures (in vitro). Animal and in vitro studies are widely used and are often the first indicators of potential reproductive or developmental effects. However, the health risks for human populations may be considerably different, because of differences in exposure levels [128], reproductive issues, metabolism, size, and lifespan, which make it difficult to extrapolate from effects found in animals to effects that might be expected in women [23]. Recognising that a pesticide has the potential to cause harm reveals only a hazard. The risk of this pesticide actually inducing a biological effect depends on its properties, but the effect will only occur when exposure reaches a particular level [128]. Endocrine disruptors that accumulate in the body may eventually reach higher threshold levels necessary for exertion of their biological effects. Throughout the intricate processes of the menstrual cycle, ovum production, fertilization, implantation, and growth and developmental of the fetus, specific and often short time intervals exist in which these processes may be particularly susceptible to low-dose exposures of endocrine disruptors [23].

Another difficulty in human studies is that people can be exposed to endocrine disruptors in various ways, such as through iatrogenic exposure, endogenous estrogens, natural substances with estrogenic or androgenic activity (bioflavonoiden), and environmental endocrine disruptors like pesticides. In addition, it is quite feasible that interactions between endocrine disruptors play a role when there is combined exposure [129]. Therefore, the results of epidemiologic studies seldom pertain to specific pesticides and firm conclusions about causality of effects of endocrine disrupters on the female reproductive system are lacking. Still, we will give a quick overview of the epidemiological studies which found associations between pesticide exposure and reproductive effects that may be due to disruption of the female hormonal function (see Figure 1).

Menstrual cycle disturbances

Two studies examined the effects of pesticide exposure on the menstrual cycle. Both found associations between serum levels of DDT or a metabolite of DDT and short cycles [130] and undefined 'menstrual disturbances' [131]. A recent study observed that women who currently used pesticides experienced longer menstrual cycles and increased odds of missed periods compared with women who never used pesticides [10]. In addition, women who used probably hormonally active pesticides had a 60–100% increased odds of experiencing long cycles, missed periods, and intermenstrual bleeding compared with women who had never used pesticides.

Infertility

In a study in the USA, infertile women were observed to be three times more likely to ever having been exposed to pesticides [14] and nine times more likely to ever having worked in agriculture [13]. Another study found no correlations between infertility and self-reported overall pesticide exposure, working in the agricultural sector, or living on a farm during the two years before the diagnosis of infertility or the last pregnancy [132]. However, an association was present when exposure to herbicides only was considered.

Time-to-pregnancy

Three studies examined the effects of pesticide exposure on the time it took couples to become pregnant [time-to-pregnancy (TTP)], which is affected by disturbances in the whole chain from gametogenesis to embryonic survival [133, 134]. No consistent pattern of associations was observed by Curtis et al. in Canada, but some specific pesticides were tentatively associated with prolonged TTP [135]. Abell et al. and Idrove et al. found significantly prolonged TTPs related to high levels of pesticide exposure among female worker in flower greenhouses [11, 12].

Spontaneous abortion/stillbirth

A number of studies reported that among women occupationally exposed to pesticides and/or working in the agricultural sector the risks of spontaneous abortion [136–139] and stillbirth [140–144] seemed to be significantly increased. In addition, two reviews concluded that there are numerous indications that exposure to pesticides may contribute to spontaneous abortion and/or stillbirth [145], but it is unclear whether this should be considered as an endocrine disrupting effect [146].

Developmental defects

For birth defects, an overall association with agricultural work was observed in a large cohort study [147]. Studies focusing on specific birth defects found associations between agricultural work and orofacial clefts [138], hypospadias [148], total anomalous venous return [149], spina bifida [148, 150], and limb reduction defects [148, 151], although the relation with limb reduction defects was contradicted by one other study [152]. In a well-conducted Finnish study of women in agricultural occupations, the investigators found that exposure to pesticides during the first trimester of pregnancy nearly doubled the risk of cleft lips and palates in offspring [153]. A slightly increased risk for central nervous system defects was also observed. Again, a cause-effect relation between these defects and exposure to endocrine disrupting pesticides could not be established.

Conclusion

In this review, we described the different ways in which pesticides may disrupt the hormonal function of the female reproductive system and in particular the ovarian cycle. Pesticides are not one common substance, but comprise a large number of distinct substances with dissimilar structures and diverse toxicity which may act through different mechanisms. Therefore, it is most likely that not just one but several of the above-mentioned mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiological pathways explaining the role of pesticide exposure in ovarian cycle disturbances ultimately leading to fertility problems and other reproduction toxic effects. A disadvantage of the studies described is that they were mostly laboratory animal and cell culture studies. These often provide the first indications of potential reproductive effects of a chemical, but it is difficult to extrapolate the effects found in laboratory animals to effects that might be expected in women. Therefore, we also reviewed epidemiological studies which lead to the conclusion that exposure to pesticides may be associated with menstrual cycle disturbances, reduced fertility, prolonged time-to-pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, stillbirths, and developmental defects. However, in most of these studies specific information on pesticide exposure and the pathophysiological mechanisms involved was missing. Furthermore, we have to take into account that dose, timing, and duration of exposure are critical to the ability of a pesticide to cause harmful effects. Nevertheless, real-life occupational exposures to pesticides appear to have adverse effects on female reproduction. In future research, information on the ways in which pesticides may disrupt the hormonal function as described in this review, can be used to generate specific hypotheses for studies on the effects of pesticides on the ovarian cycle, both in toxicological and epidemiological settings.

Abbreviations

CNS:

central nervous system

DDE:

dichlorodiphenyldichloroehthylene

DDT:

dichlorodiphenyltricloroethane

EDC:

endocrine disrupting chemical

EPA:

environmental protection agency

FAO:

food and agriculture organization

FSH :

follicle stimulating hormone

GnRH :

gonadotropin releasing hormone

LH :

luteinizing hormone

PCB:

polychlorinated biphenyl

SHBG:

sex-hormone-binding globulin

SMD:

sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate

PrOO:

pre-ovulatory over-ripeness ovopathy

TTP:

time-to-pregnancy

WHO:

world health organization

References

  1. de Cock J, Westveer K, Heederik D, te VE, van Kooij R: Time to pregnancy and occupational exposure to pesticides in fruit growers in The Netherlands. Occup Environ Med. 1994, 51: 693-699.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen SB, Giwercman A, Spano M, Bonde JP: A longitudinal study of semen quality in pesticide spraying Danish farmers. The ASCLEPIOS Study Group. Reprod Toxicol. 1998, 12: 581-589. 10.1016/S0890-6238(98)00047-1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whorton D, Krauss RM, Marshall S, Milby TH: Infertility in male pesticide workers. Lancet. 1977, 2: 1259-1261. 10.1016/S0140-6736(77)92665-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyrobek AJ, Watchmaker G, Gordon L, Wong K, Moore D, Whorton D: Sperm shape abnormalities in carbaryl-exposed employees. Environ Health Perspect. 1981, 40: 255-265.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joffe M, Li Z: Male and female factors in fertility. Am J Epidemiol. 1994, 140: 921-929.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Gold EB, Lasley BL, Johnson WO: Factors affecting menstrual cycle characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2004, 160: 131-140. 10.1093/aje/kwh188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolumar F, Olsen J, Boldsen J: Smoking reduces fecundity: a European multicenter study on infertility and subfecundity. The European Study Group on Infertility and Subfecundity. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 143: 578-587.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper GS, Klebanoff MA, Promislow J, Brock JW, Longnecker MP: Polychlorinated biphenyls and menstrual cycle characteristics. Epidemiology. 2005, 16: 191-200. 10.1097/01.ede.0000152913.12393.86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Michon S: Disturbances of menstruation in women working in an atmosphere polluted with aromatic hydrocarbons. Polski Lekarski. 1965, 20: 1648-1649.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farr SL, Cooper GS, Cai J, Savitz DA, Sandler DP: Pesticide useand menstrual cycle characteristics among premenopausal women in the Agricultural Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004, 160: 1194-1204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abell A, Juul S, Bonde JP: Time to pregnancy among female greenhouse workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000, 26: 131-136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Idrovo AJ, Sanin LH, Cole D, Chavarro J, Caceres H, Narvaez J, Restrepo M: Time to first pregnancy among women working in agricultural production. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005, 78: 493-500. 10.1007/s00420-005-0615-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuortes L, Clark MK, Kirchner HL, Smith EM: Association betweenfemale infertility and agricultural work history. Am J Ind Med. 1997, 31: 445-451. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199704)31:4<445::AID-AJIM11>3.0.CO;2-#.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith EM, Hammonds-Ehlers M, Clark MK, Kirchner HL, Fuortes L: Occupational exposures and risk of female infertility. J Occup Environ Med. 1997, 39: 138-147. 10.1097/00043764-199702000-00011.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Irvine DS: Epidemiology and aetiology of male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1998, 33-44. Suppl 1

  16. de Kretser DM: Male infertility. Lancet. 1997, 349: 787-790. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08341-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Evers JL: Female subfertility. Lancet. 2002, 360: 151-159. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09417-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snick HK, Snick TS, Evers JL, Collins JA: The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod. 1997, 12: 1582-1588. 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1582.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hull MG, Glazener CM, Kelly NJ, Conway DI, Foster PA, Hinton RA, Coulson C, Lambert PA, Watt EM, Desai KM: Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985, 291: 1693-1697.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Collins JA, Burrows EA, Wilan AR: The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 1995, 64: 22-28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kavlock RJ, Daston GP, DeRosa C, Fenner-Crisp P, Gray LE, Kaattari S, Lucier G, Luster M, Mac MJ, Maczka C, Miller R, Moore J, Rolland R, Scott G, Sheehan DM, Sinks T, Tilson HA: Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. Environ Health Perspect. 1996, 715-740. Suppl 4

  22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: FAO international code of conduct on the distribution and use of pesticides. Rome. 1986

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schettler T, Solomon G, Kaplan J, Valenti M: Generations at Risk: How Environmental Toxicants May Affect Reproductive Health in California. 2003, Brisbane, CA: George Lithograph

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henderson PT, Borm PJA, Kant dri IJ: Basisboek Arbeidstoxicologie risico-inventarisatie en -evaluatie. 1995, Zeist: Uitgeverij Kerckebosch bv

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crisp TM, Clegg ED, Cooper RL, Wood WP, Anderson DG, Baetcke KP, Hoffmann JL, Morrow MS, Rodier DJ, Schaeffer JE, Touart LW, Zeeman MG, Patel YM: Environmental endocrine disruption: an effects assessment andanalysis. Environ Health Perspect. 1998, 11-56. Suppl 1

  26. Vinggaard AM, Hnida C, Breinholt V, Larsen JC: Screening of selected pesticides for inhibition of CYP19 aromatase activity in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro. 2000, 14: 227-234. 10.1016/S0887-2333(00)00018-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hirsch KS, Weaver DE, Black LJ, Falcone JF, MacLusky NJ: Inhibition of central nervous system aromatase activity: a mechanism for fenarimol-induced infertility in the male rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1987, 91: 235-245. 10.1016/0041-008X(87)90104-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mason JI, Carr BR, Murry BA: Imidazole antimycotics: selective inhibitors of steroid aromatization and progesterone hydroxylation. Steroids. 1987, 50: 179-189. 10.1016/0039-128X(83)90070-3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanderson JT, Seinen W, Giesy JP, van den BM: 2-Chloro-s-triazine herbicides induce aromatase (CYP19) activity inH295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells: a novel mechanism for estrogenicity?. Toxicol Sci. 2000, 54: 121-127. 10.1093/toxsci/54.1.121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. You L, Sar M, Bartolucci E, Ploch S, Whitt M: Induction of hepatic aromatase by p,p'-DDE in adult male rats. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001, 178: 207-214. 10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00445-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Andersen HR, Vinggaard AM, Rasmussen TH, Gjermandsen IM, Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC: Effects of currently used pesticides in assays for estrogenicity, androgenicity, and aromatase activity in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2002, 179: 1-12. 10.1006/taap.2001.9347.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Haake J, Kelley M, Keys B, Safe S: The effects of organochlorine pesticides as inducers of testosterone and benzo[a]pyrene hydroxylases. Gen Pharmacol. 1987, 18: 165-169.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldman JM, Stoker TE, Cooper RL, McElroy WK, Hein JF: Blockade of ovulation in the rat by the fungicide sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate: relationship between effects on the luteinizing hormone surge and alterations in hypothalamic catecholamines. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1994, 16: 257-268. 10.1016/0892-0362(94)90047-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Przewlocka B, Sarnek J, Szmigielski A, Niewiadomska A: The effect of some dithiocarbamic acids on dopamine-beta-hydroxylase and catecholamines level in rat's brain. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm. 1975, 27: 555-559.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lippmann W, Lloyd K: Effects of tetramethylthiuram disulfide and structurally-related compounds on the dopamine-beta-hydroxylase activity in the rat and hamster. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1971, 189: 348-357.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gray LE, Wolf C, Lambright C, Mann P, Price M, Cooper RL, Ostby J: Administration of potentially antiandrogenic pesticides (procymidone, linuron, iprodione, chlozolinate, p,p'-DDE, and ketoconazole) and toxic substances (dibutyl- and diethylhexyl phthalate, PCB 169, and ethane dimethane sulphonate) during sexual differentiation produces diverseprofiles of reproductive malformations in the male rat. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999, 15: 94-118. 10.1191/074823399678846664.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Costa LG, Olibet G, Murphy SD: Alpha 2-adrenoceptors as atarget for formamidine pesticides: in vitro and in vivo studies in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1988, 93: 319-328. 10.1016/0041-008X(88)90132-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stoker TE, Goldman JM, Cooper RL: Delayed ovulation and pregnancy outcome: effect of environmental toxicants on the neuroendocrine control of the ovary(1). 2001, 9: 117-129.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stoker TE, Cooper RL, Goldman JM, Andrews JE: Characterization of pregnancy outcome following thiram-induced ovulatory delay in the female rat. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1996, 18: 277-282. 10.1016/S0892-0362(96)90025-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fugo NW, Butcher RL: Overripeness and the mammalian ova. I. Overripeness and early embryonic development. Fertil Steril. 1966, 17: 804-814.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jongbloet PH: Over-ripeness ovopathy: a challenging hypothesis for sex ratio modulation. Hum Reprod. 2004, 19: 769-774. 10.1093/humrep/deh136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Prakash N, Narayana K, Murthy GS, Moudgal NR, Honnegowda : The effect of malathion, an organophosphate, on the plasma FSH, 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone concentrations and acetylcholinesterase activity and conception in dairy cattle. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1992, 34: 116-119.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pfaff D, Keiner M: Atlas of estradiol-concentrating cells in the central nervous system of the female rat. J Comp Neurol. 1973, 151: 121-158. 10.1002/cne.901510204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Conney AH: Pharmacological implications of microsomal enzyme induction. Pharmacol Rev. 1967, 19: 317-366.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Waxman DJ: Interactions of hepatic cytochromes P-450 with steroid hormones. Regioselectivity and stereospecificity of steroid metabolism and hormonal regulation of rat P-450 enzyme expression. Biochem Pharmacol. 1988, 37: 71-84. 10.1016/0006-2952(88)90756-3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nowicki HG, Norman AW: Enhanced hepatic metabolism of testosterone, 4-androsterone-3,17-dione, and estradiol-17 in chickens pretreated with DDT or PCB. Steroids. 1972, 19: 85-99. 10.1016/0039-128X(72)90029-3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bulger WH, Muccitelli RM, Kupfer D: Studies on the in vivo and in vitro estrogenic activities of methoxychlor and its metabolites. Role ofhepatic mono-oxygenase in methoxychlor activation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1978, 27: 2417-2423. 10.1016/0006-2952(78)90354-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Massaad C, Entezami F, Massade L, Benahmed M, Olivennes F, Barouki R, Hamamah S: How can chemical compounds alter human fertility?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002, 100: 127-137. 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00441-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Welch RM, Levin W, Kuntzman R, Jacobson M, Conney AH: Effect of halogenated hydrocarbon insecticides on the metabolism and uterotropic action of estrogens in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1971, 19: 234-246. 10.1016/0041-008X(71)90109-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Eroschenko VP, Rourke AW, Sims WF: Estradiol or methoxychlor stimulates estrogen receptor (ER) expression in uteri. Reprod Toxicol. 1996, 10: 265-271. 10.1016/0890-6238(96)00055-X.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cummings AM: Methoxychlor as a model for environmental estrogens. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1997, 27: 367-379.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ghosh D, Taylor JA, Green JA, Lubahn DB: Methoxychlor stimulates estrogen-responsive messenger ribonucleic acids in mouse uterus through anon-estrogen receptor (non-ER) alpha and non-ER beta mechanism. Endocrinology. 1999, 140: 3526-3533. 10.1210/en.140.8.3526.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gray LE, Ostby J, Cooper RL, Kelce WR: The estrogenic and antiandrogenic pesticide methoxychlor alters the reproductive tract and behavior without affecting pituitary size or LH and prolactin secretion in male rats. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999, 15: 37-47. 10.1191/074823399678846655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gellert RJ: Kepone, mirex, dieldrin, and aldrin: estrogenic activity and the induction of persistent vaginal estrus and anovulation in rats following neonatal treatment. Environ Res. 1978, 16: 131-138. 10.1016/0013-9351(78)90150-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tully DB, Cox VT, Mumtaz MM, Davis VL, Chapin RE: Six high-priority organochlorine pesticides, either singly or in combination, are nonestrogenic in transfected HeLa cells. Reprod Toxicol. 2000, 14: 95-102. 10.1016/S0890-6238(00)00060-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dees C, Askari M, Foster JS, Ahamed S, Wimalasena J: DDT mimicks estradiol stimulation of breast cancer cells to enter the cell cycle. Mol Carcinog. 1997, 18: 107-114. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2744(199702)18:2<107::AID-MC6>3.0.CO;2-D.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shekhar PV, Werdell J, Basrur VS: Environmental estrogen stimulation of growth and estrogen receptor function in preneoplastic and cancerous human breast cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997, 89: 1774-1782.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hodges LC, Bergerson JS, Hunter DS, Walker CL: Estrogenic effects of organochlorine pesticides on uterine leiomyoma cells in vitro. Toxicol Sci. 2000, 54: 355-364. 10.1093/toxsci/54.2.355.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C, Chung KL, Fernandez MF, Olea N, Serrano FO: The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants. Environ Health Perspect. 1995, 103 (Suppl 7): 113-122.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Soto AM, Chung KL, Sonnenschein C: The pesticides endosulfan, toxaphene, and dieldrin have estrogenic effects on human estrogen-sensitive cells. Environ Health Perspect. 1994, 102: 380-383.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bonefeld Jorgensen EC, Autrup H, Hansen JC: Effect of toxapheneon estrogen receptor functions in human breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 1997, 18: 1651-1654. 10.1093/carcin/18.8.1651.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vinggaard AM, Breinholt V, Larsen JC: Screening of selected pesticides for oestrogen receptor activation in vitro. Food Addit Contam. 1999, 16: 533-542. 10.1080/026520399283678.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Danzo BJ: Environmental xenobiotics may disrupt normal endocrine function by interfering with the binding of physiological ligands to steroid receptors and binding proteins. Environ Health Perspect. 1997, 105: 294-301.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Klotz DM, Beckman BS, Hill SM, McLachlan JA, Walters MR, Arnold SF: Identification of environmental chemicals with estrogenic activity using a combination of in vitro assays. Environ Health Perspect. 1996, 104: 1084-1089.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Garey J, Wolff MS: Estrogenic and antiprogestagenic activities of pyrethroid insecticides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 251: 855-859. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9569.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kelce WR, Stone CR, Laws SC, Gray LE, Kemppainen JA, Wilson EM: Persistent DDT metabolite p,p'-DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonist. Nature. 1995, 375: 581-585. 10.1038/375581a0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Cooper RL, Chadwick RW, Rehnberg GL, Goldman JM, Booth KC, Hein JF, McElroy WK: Effect of lindane on hormonal control of reproductive function in the female rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1989, 99: 384-394. 10.1016/0041-008X(89)90148-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Chadwick RW, Cooper RL, Chang J, Rehnberg GL, McElroy WK: Possible antiestrogenic activity of lindane in female rats. J Biochem Toxicol. 1988, 3: 147-158.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pages N, Sauviat MP, Bouvet S, Goudey-Perriere F: [Reproductivetoxicity of lindane]. J Soc Biol. 2002, 196: 325-338.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Tennant MK, Hill DS, Eldridge JC, Wetzel LT, Breckenridge CB, Stevens JT: Chloro-s-triazine antagonism of estrogen action: limited interaction with estrogen receptor binding. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1994, 43: 197-211.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Tennant MK, Hill DS, Eldridge JC, Wetzel LT, Breckenridge CB, Stevens JT: Possible antiestrogenic properties of chloro-s-triazines in rat uterus. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1994, 43: 183-196.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Vinggaard AM, Joergensen EC, Larsen JC: Rapid and sensitive reporter gene assays for detection of antiandrogenic and estrogenic effectsof environmental chemicals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999, 155: 150-160. 10.1006/taap.1998.8598.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kelce WR, Lambright CR, Gray LE, Roberts KP: Vinclozolin and p,p'-DDE alter androgen-dependent gene expression: in vivo confirmation of an androgen receptor-mediated mechanism. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1997, 142: 192-200. 10.1006/taap.1996.7966.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gray LE, Ostby J, Furr J, Wolf CJ, Lambright C, Parks L, Veeramachaneni DN, Wilson V, Price M, Hotchkiss A, Orlando E, Guillette L: Effects of environmental antiandrogens on reproductive development in experimental animals. Hum Reprod Update. 2001, 7: 248-264. 10.1093/humupd/7.3.248.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kelce WR, Gray LE, Wilson EM: Antiandrogens as environmental endocrine disruptors. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1998, 10: 105-111. 10.1071/R98051.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Ostby J, Kelce WR, Lambright C, Wolf CJ, Mann P, Gray LE: The fungicide procymidone alters sexual differentiation in the malerat by acting as an androgen-receptor antagonist in vivo and in vitro. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999, 15: 80-93. 10.1191/074823399678846718.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lambright C, Ostby J, Bobseine K, Wilson V, Hotchkiss AK, Mann PC, Gray LE: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of linuron: an antiandrogenic herbicide that produces reproductive malformations in male rats. Toxicol Sci. 2000, 56: 389-399. 10.1093/toxsci/56.2.389.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Tamura H, Maness SC, Reischmann K, Dorman DC, Gray LE, Gaido KW: Androgen receptor antagonism by the organophosphate insecticide fenitrothion. Toxicol Sci. 2001, 60: 56-62. 10.1093/toxsci/60.1.56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Maness SC, McDonnell DP, Gaido KW: Inhibition of androgen receptor-dependent transcriptional activity by DDT isomers and methoxychlorin HepG2 human hepatoma cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998, 151: 135-142. 10.1006/taap.1998.8431.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sohoni P, Sumpter JP: Several environmental oestrogens are alsoanti-androgens. J Endocrinol. 1998, 158: 327-339. 10.1677/joe.0.1580327.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Vonier PM, Crain DA, McLachlan JA, Guillette LJ, Arnold SF: Interaction of environmental chemicals with the estrogen and progesterone receptors from the oviduct of the American alligator. Environ Health Perspect. 1996, 104: 1318-1322.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. O'Brian CA, Liskamp RM, Solomon DH, Weinstein IB: Inhibition of protein kinase C by tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 1985, 45: 2462-2465.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Safe S, Astroff B, Harris M, Zacharewski T, Dickerson R, Romkes M, Biegel L: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds as antioestrogens: characterization and mechanism of action. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991, 69: 400-409.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Safe SH: Environmental and dietary estrogens and human health: is there a problem?. Environ Health Perspect. 1995, 103: 346-351.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Van den Berg KJ, van Raaij JA, Bragt PC, Notten WR: Interactions of halogenated industrial chemicals with transthyretin and effects on thyroid hormone levels in vivo. Arch Toxicol. 1991, 65: 15-19. 10.1007/BF01973497.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Gray LE, Kavlock RJ: The effects of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether (NIT) on serum thyroid hormones in adult female mice. Toxicol Lett. 1983, 15: 231-235. 10.1016/0378-4274(83)90221-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ram PA, Waxman DJ: Thyroid hormone stimulation of NADPH P450 reductase expression in liver and extrahepatic tissues. Regulation by multiple mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 3294-3301.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Cooke PS, Eroschenko VP: Inhibitory effects of technical grade methoxychlor on development of neonatal male mouse reproductive organs. Biol Reprod. 1990, 42: 585-596. 10.1095/biolreprod42.3.585.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Palanza P, Parmigiani S, Liu H, vom Saal FS: Prenatal exposure to low doses of the estrogenic chemicals diethylstilbestrol and o,p'-DDT alters aggressive behavior of male and female house mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999, 64: 665-672. 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00151-3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Wilson CA, Leigh AJ, Chapman AJ: Gonadotrophin glycosylation and function. J Endocrinol. 1990, 125: 3-14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Nicolopoulou-Stamati P, Pitsos MA: The impact of endocrine disrupters on the female reproductive system. Hum Reprod Update. 2001, 7: 323-330. 10.1093/humupd/7.3.323.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Oduma JA, Wango EO, Oduor-Okelo D, Makawiti DW, Odongo H: In vivo and in vitro effects of graded doses of the pesticide heptachlor on female sex steroid hormone production in rats. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1995, 111: 191-196. 10.1016/0742-8413(95)00029-N.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Rani BE, Krishnakumari MK: Prenatal toxicity of heptachlor in albino rats. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995, 76: 112-114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Eldridge JC, Fleenor-Heyser DG, Extrom PC, Wetzel LT, Breckenridge CB, Gillis JH, Luempert LG, Stevens JT: Short-term effects of chlorotriazines on estrus in female Sprague-Dawley and Fischer 344 rats. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1994, 43: 155-167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Gojmerac T, Kartal B, Curic S, Zuric M, Kusevic S, Cvetnic Z: Serum biochemical changes associated with cystic ovarian degeneration in pigs after atrazine treatment. Toxicol Lett. 1996, 85: 9-15. 10.1016/0378-4274(96)03631-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Foster WG, McMahon A, Younglai EV, Jarrell JF, Lecavalier P: Alterations in circulating ovarian steroids in hexachlorobenzene-exposed monkeys. Reprod Toxicol. 1995, 9: 541-548. 10.1016/0890-6238(95)02004-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Muller WF, Hobson W, Fuller GB, Knauf W, Coulston F, Korte F: Endocrine effects of chlorinated hydrocarbons in rhesus monkeys. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1978, 2: 161-172. 10.1016/0147-6513(78)90007-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Foster WG, McMahon A, Villeneuve DC, Jarrell JF: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) suppresses circulating progesterone concentrations during the luteal phase in the cynomolgus monkey. J Appl Toxicol. 1992, 12: 13-17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Chapin RE, Harris MW, Davis BJ, Ward SM, Wilson RE, Mauney MA, Lockhart AC, Smialowicz RJ, Moser VC, Burka LT, Collins BJ: The effects of perinatal/juvenile methoxychlor exposure on adult rat nervous, immune, and reproductive system function. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997, 40: 138-157. 10.1006/faat.1997.2381.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Cummings AM, Laskey J: Effect of methoxychlor on ovarian steroidogenesis: role in early pregnancy loss. Reprod Toxicol. 1993, 7: 17-23. 10.1016/0890-6238(93)90005-R.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Lindenau A, Fischer B, Seiler P, Beier HM: Effects of persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons on reproductive tissues in female rabbits. Hum Reprod. 1994, 9: 772-780.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Martinez EM, Swartz WJ: Effects of methoxychlor on the reproductive system of the adult female mouse. 1. Gross and histologic observations. Reprod Toxicol. 1991, 5: 139-147. 10.1016/0890-6238(91)90042-E.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Uphouse L, Mason G, Hunter V: Persistent vaginal estrus and serum hormones after chlordecone (kepone) treatment of adult female rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984, 72: 177-186. 10.1016/0041-008X(84)90301-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Swartz WJ, Mall GM: Chlordecone-induced follicular toxicity inmouse ovaries. Reprod Toxicol. 1989, 3: 203-206. 10.1016/0890-6238(89)90008-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Asmathbanu I, Kaliwal BB: Temporal effect of methyl parathion on ovarian compensatory hypertrophy, follicular dynamics and estrous cycle in hemicastrated albino rats. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1997, 8: 237-254.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Dhondup P, Kaliwal BB: Inhibition of ovarian compensatory hypertrophy by the administration of methyl parathion in hemicastrated albino rats. Reprod Toxicol. 1997, 11: 77-84. 10.1016/S0890-6238(96)00199-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Kumar R, Uppal RP: Effect of malathion on estrous cycle and reproductive performance of rats. J Environ Biol. 1986, 7: 35-39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Gouda H, Sastry MS: Effect of 0,0-Dimethyl-0 phosphorothicate (sumithion) on reproductive performance in rats and oestrogenic activity in mice. Indian J Pharmacol. 1979, 11: 287-292.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wetzel LT, Luempert LG, Breckenridge CB, Tisdel MO, Stevens JT, Thakur AK, Extrom PJ, Eldridge JC: Chronic effects of atrazine on estrus and mammary tumor formation in female Sprague-Dawley and Fischer 344 rats. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1994, 43: 169-182.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Cooper RL, Stoker TE, Goldman JM, Parrish MB, Tyrey L: Effect of atrazine on ovarian function in the rat. Reprod Toxicol. 1996, 10: 257-264. 10.1016/0890-6238(96)00054-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Laws SC, Ferrell JM, Stoker TE, Schmid J, Cooper RL: The effects of atrazine on female wistar rats: an evaluation of the protocol for assessing pubertal development and thyroid function. Toxicol Sci. 2000, 58: 366-376. 10.1093/toxsci/58.2.366.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Simic B, Kniewald J, Kniewald Z: Effects of atrazine on reproductive performance in the rat. J Appl Toxicol. 1994, 14: 401-404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Baligar PN, Kaliwal BB: Reproductive toxicity of carbofuran tothe female mice: effects on estrous cycle and follicles. Ind Health. 2002, 40: 345-352.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Oduma JA, Wango EO, Makawiti DW, Einer-Jensen N, Oduor-Okelo D: Effects of graded doses of the pesticide heptachlor on body weight, mating success, oestrous cycle, gestation length and litter size in laboratory rats. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1995, 110: 221-227. 10.1016/0742-8413(94)00028-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Lahiri P, Chakravarty S, Mondal A, Sircar S: Effect of lindaneon cytology and cytochemistry of exfoliated vaginal cells. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 1985, 85: 303-308.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Baligar PN, Kaliwal BB: Induction of gonadal toxicity to female rats after chronic exposure to mancozeb. Ind Health. 2001, 39: 235-243.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. van Birgelen AP, Hebert CD, Wenk ML, Grimes LK, Chapin RE, Travlos GS, Mahler J, Bucher JR: Toxicity of 3,3',4,4'-tetrachloroazoxybenzene in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999, 156: 206-221. 10.1006/taap.1999.8647.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Goldman JM, Cooper RL, Edwards TL, Rehnberg GL, McElroy WK, Hein JF: Suppression of the luteinizing hormone surge by chlordimeform in ovariectomized, steroid-primed female rats. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991, 68: 131-136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Ashby J, Tinwell H, Stevens J, Pastoor T, Breckenridge CB: The effects of atrazine on the sexual maturation of female rats. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002, 35: 468-473. 10.1006/rtph.2002.1571.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Stoker TE, Goldman JM, Cooper RL: The dithiocarbamate fungicide thiram disrupts the hormonal control of ovulation in the female rat. Reprod Toxicol. 1993, 7: 211-218. 10.1016/0890-6238(93)90226-W.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Ma WG, Song H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK: Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 2963-2968. 10.1073/pnas.0530162100.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Bindali BB, Kaliwal BB: Anti-implantation effect of acarbamate fungicide mancozeb in albino mice. Ind Health. 2002, 40: 191-197.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Cooper RL, Barrett MA, Goldman JM, Rehnberg GR, McElroy WK, Stoker TE: Pregnancy alterations following xenobiotic-induced delays in ovulation in the female rat. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994, 22: 474-480. 10.1006/faat.1994.1053.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Cummings AM, Perreault SD: Methoxychlor accelerates embryo transport through the rat reproductive tract. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1990, 102: 110-116. 10.1016/0041-008X(90)90088-C.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Silvestroni L, Fiorini R, Palleschi S: Partition of the organochlorine insecticide lindane into the human sperm surface induces membrane depolarization and Ca2+ influx. Biochem J. 1997, 321: 691-698.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Silvestroni L, Palleschi S: Effects of organochlorine xenobiotics on human spermatozoa. Chemosphere. 1999, 39: 1249-1252. 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00192-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Guillette LJ, Gross TS, Masson GR, Matter JM, Percival HF, Woodward AR: Developmental abnormalities of the gonad and abnormal sex hormone concentrations in juvenile alligators from contaminated and control lakes in Florida. Environ Health Perspect. 1994, 102: 680-688.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Sharpe RM, Irvine DS: How strong is the evidence of a link between environmental chemicals and adverse effects on human reproductive health?. BMJ. 2004, 328: 447-451. 10.1136/bmj.328.7437.447.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Simons SS: Environmental estrogens: can two "alrights" make a wrong?. Science. 1996, 272: 1451-

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Windham GC: Exposure to DDT and matabolites in relation to menstrual cycle length among Laotian immigrants. Epidemiology. 2002, 13: S198-10.1097/00001648-200211000-00012.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Chase HP, Barnett SE, Welch NN, Briese FW, Krassner ML: Pesticides and U.S. farm labor families. Rocky Mt Med J. 1973, 70: 27-31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Greenlee AR, Arbuckle TE, Chyou PH: Risk factors for female infertility in an agricultural region. Epidemiology. 2003, 14: 429-436.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. te Velde ER, Eijkemans R, Habbema HD: Variation in couple fecundity and time to pregnancy, an essential concept in human reproduction. Lancet. 2000, 355: 1928-1929. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02320-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR: Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1986, 124: 470-480.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Curtis KM, Savitz DA, Weinberg CR, Arbuckle TE: The effect of pesticide exposure on time to pregnancy. Epidemiology. 1999, 10: 112-117. 10.1097/00001648-199903000-00002.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Arbuckle TE, Savitz DA, Mery LS, Curtis KM: Exposure to phenoxy herbicides and the risk of spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology. 1999, 10: 752-760. 10.1097/00001648-199911000-00014.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Arbuckle TE, Lin Z, Mery LS: An exploratory analysis of the effect of pesticide exposure on the risk of spontaneous abortion in an Ontario farm population. Environ Health Perspect. 2001, 109: 851-857.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Nurminen T: Maternal pesticide exposure and pregnancy outcome. J Occup Environ Med. 1995, 37: 935-940.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Hemminki K, Niemi ML, Saloniemi I, Vainio H, Hemminki E: Spontaneous abortions by occupation and social class in Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 1980, 9: 149-153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Savitz DA, Whelan EA, Kleckner RC: Effect of parents' occupational exposures on risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and small-for-gestational-age infants. Am J Epidemiol. 1989, 129: 1201-1218.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Goulet L, Theriault G: Stillbirth and chemical exposure of pregnant workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991, 17: 25-31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Pastore LM, Hertz-Picciotto I, Beaumont JJ: Risk of stillbirth from occupational and residential exposures. Occup Environ Med. 1997, 54: 511-518.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Goulet L, Theriault G: Stillbirth and chemical exposure of pregnant workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991, 17: 25-31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Rupa DS, Reddy PP, Reddi OS: Reproductive performance in population exposed to pesticides in cotton fields in India. Environ Res. 1991, 55: 123-128. 10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80168-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Arbuckle TE, Sever LE: Pesticide exposures and fetal death: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1998, 28: 229-270. 10.1080/10408449891344218.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Hanke W, Jurewicz J: The risk of adverse reproductive and developmental disorders due to occupational pesticide exposure: an overviewof current epidemiological evidence. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004, 17: 223-243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. McDonald AD, McDonald JC, Armstrong B, Cherry NM, Cote R, Lavoie J, Nolin AD, Robert D: Congenital defects and work in pregnancy. Br J Ind Med. 1988, 45: 581-588.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Kristensen P, Irgens LM, Andersen A, Bye AS, Sundheim L: Birth defects among offspring of Norwegian farmers, 1967–1991. Epidemiology. 1997, 8: 537-544. 10.1097/00001648-199709000-00011.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Correa-Villasenor A, Ferencz C, Boughman JA, Neill CA: Total anomalous pulmonary venous return: familial and environmental factors. The Baltimore-Washington Infant Study Group. Teratology. 1991, 44: 415-428. 10.1002/tera.1420440408.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Blatter BM, Roeleveld N, Zielhuis GA, Mullaart RA, Gabreels FJ: Spina bifida and parental occupation. Epidemiology. 1996, 7: 188-193.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Kricker A, McCredie J, Elliott J, Forrest J: Women and the environment: a study of congenital limb anomalies. Community Health Stud. 1986, 10: 1-11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Lin S, Marshall EG, Davidson GK: Potential parental exposure to pesticides and limb reduction defects. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994, 20: 166-179.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Nurminen T, Rantala K, Kurppa K, Holmberg PC: Agricultural work during pregnancy and selected structural malformations in Finland. Epidemiology. 1995, 6: 23-30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is based on work sponsored by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands

    Reini W Bretveld, Paul TJ Scheepers, Gerhard A Zielhuis & Nel Roeleveld

  2. Chemical Endocrinology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen,, HB,, The Netherlands

    Chris MG Thomas

Authors
  1. Reini W Bretveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris MG Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul TJ Scheepers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerhard A Zielhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nel Roeleveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nel Roeleveld.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

RB performed the literature search and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed substantially to the conception of the outline of the review, gave advise during the literature study, and critically revised subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bretveld, R.W., Thomas, C.M., Scheepers, P.T. et al. Pesticide exposure: the hormonal function of the female reproductive system disrupted?. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 4, 30 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-4-30

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-4-30

Keywords

  • Androgen Receptor
  • Endosulfan
  • Heptachlor
  • Estrus Cycle
  • Methyl Parathion

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us