Skip to main content

Consideration of hormonal changes for orthodontic treatment during pregnancy and lactation - a review

Abstract

Hormonal changes in pregnant and lactating women significantly affect bone metabolism and overall stress levels, positioning them as a unique group within the orthodontic population. Fluctuations in estrogen, progesterone, prolactin, and other hormones are closely linked to bone remodeling and the periodontal tissue’s response to inflammation caused by dental plaque. Hormones such as thyrotropin, leptin, and melatonin also play crucial roles in pregnancy and bone remodeling, with potential implications for orthodontic tooth movement. Additionally, adverse personal behaviors and changes in dietary habits worsen periodontal conditions and complicate periodontal maintenance during orthodontic treatment. Notably, applying orthodontic force during pregnancy and lactation may trigger stress responses in the endocrine system, altering hormone levels. However, these changes do not appear to adversely affect the mother or fetus. This review comprehensively examines the interaction between hormone levels and orthodontic tooth movement in pregnant and lactating women, offering insights to guide clinical practice.

Introduction

With the increasing public demand for facial beauty, the number of adult female patients seeking orthodontic treatment exceeds that of male patients due to concerns such as protruding teeth, gaps between teeth, crowded teeth, and an unsightly smile [1]. The lengthy duration of orthodontic treatment poses challenges for women of childbearing age, particularly if they become pregnant during the treatment period. Pregnancy and lactation in female orthodontic patients introduce risks that may affect the progress of treatment and potentially impact both the mother and fetus.

A significant feature of pregnancy and lactation is the dramatic change in hormone levels. Current studies confirm that these hormonal changes significantly influence bone metabolism and inflammation in the body. The rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) can be regulated by pathways related to bone metabolism. Therefore, adaptive changes in bone homeostasis during pregnancy and lactation, along with the balance between osteoclast activity and osteoblast deposition, may affect OTM. Hormone levels also regulate susceptibility to oral diseases. Since the 1960s, researchers have linked pregnancy to periodontal health, with gestational gingivitis being the most common oral manifestation of pregnancy, affecting 35–100% of pregnant women [2]. Poor oral hygiene and hormonal influences during pregnancy may increase the risk of recurrent oral granuloma gravidarum (OGG) and gingivitis [3, 4]. Additionally, pregnancy significantly affects tooth mobility, with the highest mobility occurring in the third trimester [5]. During lactation, the influence of estrogen and prolactin (PRL) enhances female bone turnover, resulting in a negative balance of bone homeostasis [6]. Excessive orthodontic force may further reduce alveolar bone density [7]. Thus, hormone levels may regulate the speed of tooth movement during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Moreover, orthodontic treatment may pose potential safety concerns for the mother or fetus during these periods.

Currently, an increasing number of clinical studies are focusing on the impact of menstrual sex hormone changes on tooth mobility [8, 9] and OTM [10, 11]. The hormonal fluctuations during pregnancy and lactation are more significant and prolonged. Understanding the influence of these hormonal changes on OTM will provide valuable guidance for clinical practice. Therefore, this article explores the interaction mechanism between hormone levels and OTM, which is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This research aims to raise awareness among orthodontists about the specific considerations for treating pregnant and lactating women, ultimately reducing risks for both patients and practitioners.

Effects of hormone changes during pregnancy and lactation on OTM

Effect of estrogen and progesterone on OTM during pregnancy

Effect of estrogen on PDLSC and PLFs

Pregnancy is a unique state of continuous adaptation of maternal physiology, involving changes in metabolism, hormone levels, inflammatory status, nutritional needs, and the immune system [12]. Estrogen and progesterone levels fluctuate significantly during pregnancy. Estrogen, a steroid hormone secreted by the ovary and placenta, includes estrone, estradiol, and estriol. Among these, estradiol has the strongest biological activity and the most clinical applications. Serum concentrations of estradiol range from 188 to 2497 pg/mL during the first trimester, reaching up to 7192 pg/mL by term [13]. Compared to non-pregnancy levels, estrogen increases tenfold, while progesterone increases thirtyfold [14]. Estrogen plays a unique role in oral diseases, with its expression varying across different life stages in women. For instance, high estrogen levels during pregnancy can alter oral microbiota, promoting gingivitis, while low estrogen levels after menopause can exacerbate temporomandibular joint degradation and increase alveolar bone loss [15]. Recent studies have shown that pregnancy-related hormones can affect periodontal tissue remodeling by acting on related stem cells and immune cells in periodontal tissue (Table 1).

Table 1 Effects of hormonal changes during pregnancy on related cells during OTM

Periodontal stem cells (PDLSCs), isolated from the periodontal ligament—a connective tissue that links cementum and alveolar bone and restricts tooth movement within the jaw bone—can differentiate into various cell types. PDLSCs play a crucial role in periodontal reconstruction, including bone formation. Estrogen receptor (ER) α and β are involved in the osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs and are vital for bone formation [16]. Estrogen binds to ERs on the PDLSC cell membrane to regulate intracellular signal expression, promoting PDLSCs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, thereby facilitating the repair and re-adhesion of periodontal ligament fibers to new cementum and reconstructed alveolar bone [17] In addition, estrogens bind to ERα and ERβ of the cell membranes of PDLSCs, promoting cell proliferation and differentiation into periodontal ligament fibroblasts(PLFs), osteoblasts, and cementoblasts [18, 19]. Studies indicate that changes in bone metabolism during pregnancy and lactation, and osteoporotic changes due to estrogen deficiency, may affect the rate of tooth movement [20, 21].

The potential impact of estrogen deficiency on the osteoblastic differentiation of PDLSCs was investigated using bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) in female rats. It was found that the activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), secretion of osteocalcin (OCN), mineral formation, and mRNA expression levels of ERα and ERβ were significantly decreased in the OVX group. The addition of estradiol significantly suppressed the proliferation of PDLSCs in ovariectomized rats but enhanced their osteogenic differentiation and increased mRNA expression levels of ALP, OCN, ERα, and ERβ [22]. These results indicated that estrogen enhanced the bone regeneration potential of PDLSCs in rats and was beneficial to the osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs.

Estrogen not only acts on PDLSCs but also regulates the formation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Estradiol may inhibit tooth movement through an ERα-mediated mechanism, as evidenced by increased osteoclast numbers and decreased osteoblast numbers during tooth movement in ERα-deficient mice [23]. Compared to gingival fibroblasts (GFs), the addition of estradiol significantly inhibited the formation of osteoclast-like cells induced by PLFs. The number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-labeled osteoclast-like cells was significantly reduced [24]. Estrogen and ER specifically bind to form a hormone-receptor complex that promotes the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts, inhibits the activity and generation of osteoclasts, and participates in bone metabolism through ER-related signal transduction pathways. The effect of estrogen on osteoblasts and osteoclasts lays the foundation for its regulation of OTM.

Effect of estrogen on macrophages

The speed of tooth movement is closely related to the activity of osteoclasts. Macrophages, as part of the monocyte-macrophage system, regulate osteoclasts under certain conditions [25]. Based on their activation state and function, macrophages are mainly classified into classically activated M1 type and selectively activated M2 type [26]. The phenotypic phases of macrophages play different roles in the OTM process. Initially, macrophages are recruited to the inflammatory site, where various inflammatory factors promote their polarization towards the M1 type, aggregating on the compressed side of the periodontal tissue [27, 28]. M1 macrophages accelerate OTM by overexpressing TNF-α and inducing inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) to promote inflammation [27]. During the early stage of tooth movement, the expression of M1 macrophages increases and remains elevated for a period [27], while M2 macrophages, which promote tissue repair, do not significantly increase until the later stage [28]. In the early stage of OTM, M1 macrophages predominate, while in the late stage, M2 macrophages accumulate significantly, which is critical for the cessation of bone resorption and the initiation of tissue repair. Estradiol significantly decreases the gene expression of inflammatory markers and the production of IL-1β in M1 macrophages, while significantly upregulating anti-inflammatory markers and enhancing migration in M2 macrophages [29]. The promotion of M2 macrophages by estradiol may aid periodontal tissue repair during OTM. Estrogen not only affects alveolar bone remodeling by acting on PDLSCs and PLFs but also regulates bone metabolism by influencing macrophage expression of inflammatory factors. Additionally, estrogen inhibits root resorption and promotes root regeneration, protecting root integrity during orthodontic treatment [30]. However, there is a lack of research on the differences in root resorption between pregnancy and non-pregnancy under high estrogen levels.

Potential effects of estrogen on temporomandibular joint

Estrogen is a hormone that plays a key role in various physiological processes, including bone and joint health. ER are present in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and are unevenly distributed, performing different functions [31]. Estrogen levels affect the structure and function of the TMJ. Estrogen signaling is complex, involving different pathways that may promote anabolism of mandibular condylar fibrocartilage or mediate facial pain [15]. The health and function of articular condylar fibrocartilage are crucial for bearing and redistributing the load on the subchondral bone. Damage to this fibrocartilage leads to TMJ degeneration. Estrogen reduces the thickness of joint fibrocartilage by inhibiting chondrocyte proliferation and promoting chondrocyte maturation [32], while progesterone may be essential for joint remodeling, for morphogenesis [33]. Thus, estrogen plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of temporomandibular joint cartilage.

Estrogen levels fluctuate significantly during pregnancy, and many studies have investigated the association between pregnancy and the prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) [34]. TMD encompasses a variety of conditions affecting the TMJ and its associated muscles. These disorders affect approximately 15% of adults, are most common between the ages of 20 and 40, and often present with symptoms such as jaw discomfort, dysfunction, earache, facial pain, and headache [34, 35]. The etiology of TMD is multifactorial, influenced by biological, environmental, social, and psychological factors [36]. Estrogen may have a biphasic effect on TMD, with high and/or fluctuating levels promoting some types of TMD and low levels exacerbating others [15].

Pregnancy induces a range of physiological changes in women, including hormonal fluctuations, weight gain, and postural adjustments, all of which can affect TMD [15]. Hormonal changes during pregnancy may impact the TMJ and its surrounding structures. Studies have shown that TMJ relaxation increases and musculoskeletal maxillofacial pain decreases during pregnancy [37]. Estrogen plays a role in TMD-related pain, with chronic pain levels being highest when estrogen levels are lowest. As pregnancy progresses, pain decreases, reaching its lowest at 36 weeks of gestation [38]. Estrogen deficiency is associated with increased pain sensitivity, and experimental studies indicate that high levels of estrogen and progesterone have anti-nociceptive properties [39]. Fluctuating estrogen levels can make women more prone to prolonged pain [15].

Earlier studies indicated that TMD primarily affects women of reproductive age, suggesting that higher estrogen levels might aggravate the condition [37, 40]. However, two longitudinal studies have shown that oral and facial pain significantly decreases during the third trimester [35] and increases postpartum [41]. Recent studies have also found that TMD pain decreases when estrogen levels are elevated, and the prevalence of TMD in pregnant women is 2–3 times lower than in non-pregnant women [42]. This suggests that TMD-related pain decreases with elevated estrogen levels. One possible explanation for the inconsistent outcomes of pregnancy and hormone replacement therapy is altered tissue sensitivity to estrogen level fluctuations rather than the concentration levels themselves [43].

Some studies have suggested that elevated estrogen levels may increase the risk of TMD, while others have found no such association. Evidence indicates that TMD mainly affects women of reproductive age, implying that higher estrogen levels increase TMD risk [37]. However, a recent systematic review found no significant difference in TMD prevalence between pregnant and non-pregnant women of reproductive age [44]. A case-control cross-sectional study also indicated that pregnancy is neither a risk factor nor a protective factor for TMD [45]. Differences in diagnostic criteria may have contributed to the variations in prevalence reported across studies.

In general, estrogen is involved in the anabolism of condylar fibrocartilage and mediates TMD-related facial pain. Estrogen levels fluctuate significantly during pregnancy, and orthodontists must recognize that these hormonal changes can impact orthodontic treatment through their potential effects on the TMJ. Additionally, painful TMD is associated with higher levels of emotional distress, making it essential to routinely assess physical, psychological, and social distress, particularly stress and quality of life, in patients with painful TMD [46]. Pregnant women often face various stressors that can affect both maternal and fetal health. Differences in pain perception, functional status, and mental health have been observed in pregnant women [45]. Studies have found a significant correlation between depression and several TMD-related indicators, indicating that higher depression scores correlate with greater TMD severity [45]. Therefore, the mental health of pregnant women should be closely monitored during orthodontic treatment, as depression-related joint symptoms may affect the treatment process.

Effect of progesterone on periodontal tissue

Progesterone, produced by the follicle, primarily ensures the implantation of the fertilized egg and maintains pregnancy. During pregnancy, levels of sex hormones such as progesterone and estrogen rise sharply, altering metabolism and immune function, which may affect the growth of oral microorganisms [47]. This makes women more susceptible to periodontal diseases during pregnancy [12, 48]. Pregnancy-related gingivitis is associated with increased concentrations of progesterone, which enhances the growth of Prevotella intermedia, the most common bacteria in pregnancy-induced gingivitis [49]. Elevated levels of estradiol and progesterone in saliva are associated with a 55-fold increase in the proportion of Prevotella intermedia throughout pregnancy [50]. Additionally, estradiol and progesterone may affect gingival homeostasis and wound healing [51]. High levels of progesterone during pregnancy downregulate IL-6 production, reducing the gingiva’s efficiency in resisting inflammatory challenges produced by bacteria to 40–50% of control IL-6 production in the third trimester [52]. GFs are active participants in the oral immune response, producing multiple chemokines and large amounts of matrix metalloproteinases after exposure to IL-1β. GFs attract neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and fibroblasts to injured areas and contribute to wound repair. Female sex hormone concentrations, especially progesterone, significantly affect these signaling systems [53]. Elevated progesterone significantly inhibits matrix metalloproteinase production in GFs in response to IL-1β, reducing periodontal tissue destruction, which may explain why pregnancy-related gingivitis rarely progresses to periodontitis [54]. Hormone levels influence the oral inflammatory state, increasing the burden on periodontal tissue during orthodontic treatment. Veynachter et al. [55]. reported a case of recurrent oral pregnancy granuloma during two pregnancies and four times during orthodontic treatment. Despite multiple surgical resections during pregnancy, the patient successfully delivered and completed orthodontic treatment. Progesterone not only affects gum inflammation but also regulates osteoblasts. It can stimulate the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLCs), suggesting its important role in maintaining alveolar bone mass [56]. He et al. [57]. showed that increased progesterone during pregnancy enhances vascular reactivity and osteogenesis, beneficial to OTM, leading to extended follow-up times and reduced orthodontic force in clinical practice without significantly prolonging the treatment duration. Currently, large-sample clinical studies on orthodontic treatment of pregnant women are lacking, necessitating further research on the entire course of treatment and potential complications.

Effect of estrogen and progesterone on OTM velocity

Hormone levels are closely related to bone metabolism, and the bone remodeling processes during pregnancy involve multiple hormonal and biological factors [58, 59], which may affect the rate of OTM under orthodontic forces. Most existing studies on OTM during pregnancy focus on the correlation between hormones and OTM and the expression changes of inflammatory factors during this process. Both estradiol and progesterone can affect bone turnover [60]. A systematic review of basic studies found that OTM rates increase when estrogen and progesterone levels are low during the menstrual cycle [61]. Estrogen can inhibit bone remodeling by reducing the formation of osteoblast and osteoclast precursors from bone marrow, thereby decreasing the rate of alveolar remodeling [62]. It has been reported that estrogen deficiency can accelerate OTM [63], whereas estrogen supplementation may slow it down [64, 65]. Long-term hormone drug consumption can reduce tooth mobility and increase tooth stability in the alveolar bone [9]. Animal studies have shown that the rate of OTM during pregnancy is controversial, with most opinions suggesting that bone remodeling is active and OTM rates increase after the application of corrective force during pregnancy [66,67,68,69]. However, Ghajar et al. [70]. found no statistically significant difference in the amount of OTM between pregnant and non-pregnant groups after the application of orthodontic force. Moaza et al. [20]. also reported an overall increase in OTM in the pregnant group, but it did not reach statistical significance. The number of osteoclasts is also controversial at the histological level. Ghajar et al. [70]. reported a significant reduction in the number of osteoclasts in pregnant rats, while Hessling et al. [67]. did not show a significant difference in the number of osteoclasts during pregnancy. The controversial results of these studies may be related to the complex physiological changes during pregnancy, which are influenced by multiple factors and differences in experimental design, making it difficult to compare the results or reach consistent conclusions.

In addition to the effects of estrogen changes, the expression of osteopontin increases in pregnant rats during orthodontic treatment. The intensity of osteopontin expression varies significantly at different stages of pregnancy, with the highest expression in the second trimester and the lowest in the first trimester. Osteopontin can affect OTM by promoting alveolar bone resorption on the pressure side [69]. Additionally, progesterone can act directly on osteoblasts to downregulate bone resorption and indirectly through glucocorticoid receptors and metalloproteinases [71]. Some studies have found that long-term injection of progesterone can reduce the speed of tooth movement in rabbits [72], and He et al. [68]. have shown that increasing progesterone during pregnancy is beneficial to OTM. Progesterone affects bone resorption and deposition through direct and indirect effects, and its impact on OTM may depend on whether the balance of bone homeostasis is positive or negative. Although estrogen and progesterone have protective effects on bone mass during pregnancy, maternal bone mineral density tends to decline due to increased demand [15, 59]. From this perspective, the acceleration of OTM during pregnancy is reasonable, but this still needs verification with large sample studies. Besides the regulation by estrogen and progesterone, many other hormonal and biological factors are involved in bone remodeling during pregnancy, which may alter the rate of OTM [58]. Due to the expression of estrogen receptors in periodontal tissue, hormonal changes during pregnancy may lead to water retention [73]. Therefore, when mechanical forces are applied, the periodontal membrane of pregnant individuals may become easily compressed, facilitating the inclined movement of the teeth [67]. These studies suggest that in addition to the overall regulation of bone remodeling during pregnancy, local changes in periodontal tissue may also explain the observed changes in OTM during pregnancy.

Effects of prolactin on OTM during lactation

Lactation is characterized by increased PRL levels and estrogen deficiency, with the delivery of the placenta leading to decreased levels of estradiol and progesterone [74]. High levels of PRL inhibit the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, reducing estrogen release and contributing to weakened bone function and increased bone resorption during lactation [75]. Estradiol deficiency is associated with greater root resorption during OTM [29]. Studies using ovariectomized models to simulate estrogen deficiency have found that this condition accelerates tooth movement [18]. the number of TRAP-labeled osteoclasts increased, and OTM accelerated, likely due to the acceleration of alveolar bone remodeling [76, 77]. However, the administration of estrogen can reduce the speed of tooth movement in osteoporotic rats [29]. Estrogen’s role in mediating periodontal disease is bidirectional: high estrogen levels promote gingivitis and protect bone mass, while low levels enhance alveolar bone loss. During lactation, due to the lack of estrogen, bone mineral density is lower than during pregnancy and non-pregnancy, and the rate of OTM under a light force of 50 g is significantly accelerated [78]. Macari et al. [79]. reported that lactation promotes the differentiation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts from bone marrow cells, accelerating the physiological remodeling and OTM of the maxillary bone. This accelerated bone remodeling is related to the increased expression of the receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK)/receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) signaling pathway in alveolar bone. RANKL is a key cytokine responsible for osteoclast differentiation, activity, and survival. RANKL binds to RANK on osteoclast precursors to promote bone resorption, while OPG can bind to RANKL and prevent its interaction [80]. These findings align with previous studies showing increased expression of these factors in the crania of lactating mice and in osteoblast-like cells treated with PRL. In addition to estrogen deficiency, the direct effect of PRL on bone metabolism has also been associated with bone loss in women during lactation [81, 82].

During lactation, increased PRL levels exhibit a proabsorptive effect, leading to bone mass reduction. While stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of breast cells, PRL also regulates bone resorption by influencing sex hormone levels [83]. The increase in osteoclast numbers and accelerated bone remodeling during lactation may be partly attributed to PRL promoting osteoclast differentiatio [84]. However, studies indicate that osteoclasts do not express the prolactin receptor (PRLR), whereas osteoblasts do express PRLR [85]. Thus, PRL’s effects on osteoclasts are indirect, with PRL’s influence on osteoblasts being essential for normal bone formation and bone mass maintenance [85]. Furthermore, PRL can induce osteoblasts to increase the expression of RANKL, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), TNF-α, and IL-1 [86], potentially contributing to bone loss during lactation. PRL-PRLR interactions directly increase bone turnover by elevating the RANKL/OPG ratio [87]. The effects of PRL on osteoblasts differ between adult and juvenile animals. In adult osteoblasts, PRL increases the RANKL/OPG expression ratio, inducing bone loss, while in fetal bone cells, PRL promotes bone formation and decreases the RANKL/OPG ratio in both rat and human cells [88]. Influenced by estrogen and PRL, lactation is characterized by enhanced bone turnover, with a more significant increase in bone resorption indexes than in bone formation indexes, resulting in negative bone homeostasis [6], and accelerated OTM [20]. Hormonal changes during lactation enhance bone turnover, potentially increasing tooth mobility, but also posing challenges with higher anchorage requirements. Therefore, it is essential to closely monitor anchorage control in orthodontic patients during lactation.

There are two main stages of skeletal changes related to reproduction: an increase in bone mass during early pregnancy and a loss of bone mass in late pregnancy and lactation, ultimately providing calcium for milk production [89]. During lactation, mothers supply an average of 200–250 mg/day of calcium to their infants to support bone development, with mothers of twins or triplets losing two to three times more calcium daily [90]. Insufficient dietary calcium intake necessitates increased mobilization of maternal bone metabolism to maintain calcium balance in breast milk, potentially leading to decreased bone mineral density (BMD) [91]. A reduction in BMD can accelerate OTM while reducing orthodontic force-induced root strain and the formation of resorption pits in the cementum, thus lowering the risk of root resorption during OTM [77, 92]. Hormonal changes and increased calcium demand during lactation may work together to accelerate OTM by decreasing BMD. However, the relationship between calcium intake during lactation and BMD remains controversial. Studies have shown that breastfeeding does not affect alveolar bone density when dietary calcium levels are normal [93]. Zhang et al. [94]. divided 150 lactating women into low, medium, and high calcium groups and found no significant differences in BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) after 12 months, indicating that calcium intake during lactation does not affect bone resorption. Other studies have found that different levels of calcium supplementation during lactation do not affect calcium content in breast milk [90, 95]. Excessive calcium intake during pregnancy and lactation may impact offspring development, with long-term calcium supplementation in rural Gambian women resulting in sex-specific bone effects in preadolescent offspring [96]. The optimal calcium-to-phosphorus molar ratio for proper bone development is considered to be 1:1 [97]. In many countries, phosphorus intake exceeds the recommended dietary intake, while calcium intake often falls below recommended levels [97]. Animal studies have shown that increased dietary calcium and phosphorus levels in pregnant and lactating mice have resulted in sex-specific differences in craniofacial size, shape, and temporomandibular joint development in offspring [98]. While studies on bone metabolism related to lactation yield varying conclusions, they suggest that abnormal bone metabolism may persist throughout lactation [99]. Numerous factors affect BMD changes during lactation, and it remains controversial whether increased dietary calcium intake improves BMD in pregnant and lactating patients. Further study is needed to determine the effects of calcium supplementation (increasing Ca: P ratio) on craniofacial morphology, development of malformations, and OTM in pregnant and lactating patients.

Potential hormones that influence OTM during pregnancy

Thyroid stimulating hormone

Hormones related to pregnancy fluctuate as the pregnancy progresses. Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), secreted by the placenta, increases gradually in early pregnancy and typically peaks at 8 to 10 weeks. Variations in HCG levels affect the secretion of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and other steroid hormones, with TSH concentrations being inversely correlated with HCG levels [100]. TSH levels decrease to their lowest in early pregnancy and gradually rise during mid to late pregnancy. TSH influences bone metabolism both indirectly, by regulating thyroid hormone levels, and directly, by activating osteoblasts and inhibiting the formation and function of osteoclasts. It can prevent bone loss and restore bone density lost after OVX. Studies on ovariectomized rats have shown improvements in bone microstructure and prevention of osteoporosis following intermittent low-dose TSH injections [101]. Alkaline phosphatase and TRAP activity levels are key indicators of bone metabolism. Research has shown high activity levels of alkaline phosphatase and TRAP in the periodontal tissue of rats during early pregnancy, although the specific mechanism remains unclear [66]. TSH plays a significant role in bone remodeling during pregnancy. In vitro studies have found that TSH can inhibit osteoclast differentiation and down-regulate TRAP expression [102]. This suggests that the gradual decrease in TSH levels during early pregnancy may shift the bone metabolism balance toward bone resorption. Therefore, it can be inferred that the hormonal changes during early pregnancy may promote tooth movement. However, there is limited literature on the relationship between TSH and OTM during pregnancy.

Leptin

OTM is a sterile inflammatory process characterized by osteogenesis on the tension side and resorption on the pressure side. When orthodontic force is applied to the tooth and transmitted to the periodontal tissue, it triggers a series of biological signals that remodel the alveolar bone, allowing the tooth to move to a new position during periodontal repair. Cytokines are key biochemical mediators in this process, playing a crucial role in tooth movement. Leptin, a 16 kDa non-glycated polypeptide hormone, is primarily produced by adipocytes, with smaller amounts produced by the placenta, stomach, osteoblasts, and salivary glands [103,104,105]. Leptin serves dual roles as a hormone and a cytokine, and is essential in the hypothalamus’s regulation of food intake, fat storage, and weight maintenance. As a cytokine, leptin is critical in bone remodeling, resorption, and new bone formation [105]. It directly influences bone metabolism by inducing the differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts [106, 107], down-regulating RANK produced by monocytes to inhibit osteoclast formation [108], and stimulating the central nervous and neuroendocrine systems to release corresponding mediators [109]. Leptin is involved in anti-osteogenesis through its central action on the hypothalamus [110]. In vitro studies have shown that continuous leptin stimulation in mice interferes with normal cementoblast mineralization, exacerbates the physiological stress effects on cementoblasts, promotes the release of prostaglandin E2, and increases apoptosis rates [111]. Therefore, elevated leptin levels may affect the inflammatory response during OTM.

Leptin can indirectly affect osteoclast formation by acting on PDLF, thereby influencing OTM. Leptin significantly increases the expression of RANKL in PDLF under mechanical force, with stress-induced pro-inflammatory factors rising as leptin concentration increases, thus accelerating OTM [112]. However, Yan Boxi et al. [113]. reported that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) and Wnt signaling might be involved in leptin’s regulation of OTM. Leptin can inhibit the expression of RANKL and the RANKL/OPG ratio in PDLCs through its receptor, thereby inhibiting osteoclast formation and slowing OTM. Additionally, leptin coordinates the host response to inflammatory and infectious stimuli and stimulates the immune system by enhancing cytokine production and macrophage phagocytosis [114]. Macrophages, which are inflammatory-mediated immune cells that promote osteoclast formation by interacting with PDLF, play a significant role in tooth movement. Leptin affects the expression profile of macrophages depending on mechanical load. Without mechanical stress, macrophages exhibit a pro-inflammatory phenotype (M1), but under mechanical stress, they transform into an anti-inflammatory phenotype (M2). The inhibition of inflammatory factor expression may reduce aseptic inflammation and thus slow OTM [115]. Leptin is found in both inflamed and healthy gum tissue. Clinical trials and basic studies have reported changes in leptin concentration in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) during OTM. Leptin concentration initially increases and then decreases during the early stages of tooth movement, falling below baseline after one month [116]. Most studies show a positive correlation between GCF leptin concentration and OTM velocity [116,117,118,119]. However, some reports indicate that OTM reduces leptin concentration in GCF, with leptin levels decreasing as teeth move, contradicting earlier findings [118, 120, 121]. These studies differ in experimental design (age of subjects, force size, sampling time, etc.), and patients may have varying leptin levels throughout the day due to leptin’s circadian rhythm [105]. Additionally, leptin levels differ among patients with different types of malocclusion. Compared to Class I patients, those with Class II and III malocclusions have higher salivary leptin levels [122]. Therefore, while the conclusions of these studies are difficult to compare, they all suggest that leptin is involved in regulating OTM.

Pregnancy is a metabolically demanding state for the body, requiring it to meet the energy needs of both the growing fetus and itself. Leptin, a key regulator of appetite and metabolism, links the body’s nutritional status to the process of high energy consumption and regulates satiety and energy homeostasis [123], which is particularly important during pregnancy and regulating the body’s satiety and energy homeostasis. During pregnancy, leptin produced by the placenta significantly contributes to the high concentration of circulating leptin levels in the mother [124]. Leptin concentrations peak in the second trimester and decline sharply postpartum [125]. Leptin, primarily released by adipose tissue, is a product of obesity genes, and there is a strong positive correlation between serum leptin concentration and body mass index (BMI) or fat mass [126]. Pregnancy increases food intake and fat deposition in mothers, often leading to an increase in BMI. In overweight or obese individuals, increased fat elevates serum leptin levels, which can further affect bone remodeling [127, 128]. The expression of leptin varies with different body weight states, and an increased BMI may impact OTM [129]. Existing studies show controversies regarding leptin levels and OTM speed in patients with increased BMI. Elevated leptin concentrations in obese patients, along with increased pro-inflammatory factors, RANKL, and osteoclast production, can accelerate bone resorption and thus OTM [112].

In a clinical experiment, Jayachandran et al. [119] observed that the average leptin concentration of 30 female subjects, both normal weight and overweight, significantly increased compared to baseline values at the initial stage. Overweight subjects had higher average salivary leptin concentrations than normal weight subjects, but their OTM velocity was lower. The slower OTM in obese patients with increased leptin concentrations may be attributed to leptin’s direct stimulation of bone formation, which may have a more significant impact on bone mass and delay OTM compared to its peripheral role through hypothalamic inhibition.

The prevalence of gingivitis and increased BMI during pregnancy can affect leptin concentration [130], which in turn influences bone metabolism and OTM. However, there is limited evidence on how fluctuations in leptin levels during pregnancy affect OTM and whether orthodontic interventions impact leptin levels.

Melatonin

Melatonin, also known as the “dark hormone,” is a neuroendocrine hormone synthesized in various organs, including the pineal gland and salivary glands, but primarily secreted by the pineal gland in the dark [131]. Melatonin levels are lower during the day due to its rapid breakdown and reduced production in daylight [132]. It plays crucial roles in regulating energy expenditure, body weight, normal pregnancy, and fetal development [132, 133]. During pregnancy, melatonin is endogenously produced in the ovaries and placenta, with the placenta being the main source [134]. Systemic melatonin levels are higher in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women, gradually increasing during gestation and peaking at term, then dropping to non-pregnant levels two days postpartum [134, 135]. Women with twin pregnancies have significantly higher melatonin levels compared to those with single pregnancies [136]. Melatonin is essential for adequate placental perfusion, preventing vascular damage, reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, and maintaining a favorable homeostasis environment in the placenta [135, 137]. It also influences the timing of natural labor and uterine contractions. In the first and second trimesters, melatonin promotes progesterone synthesis and supports the luteal phase; in the third trimester, it inhibits premature prolactin production to prevent preterm delivery [135, 138]. High melatonin levels in the third trimester aid in labor induction with oxytocin [139]. Melatonin may also affect early fetal development, influencing the development of the placenta, glia, and neurons [140]. Additionally, melatonin, as a non-toxic endogenous mediator, promotes cell proliferation, differentiation, and bone remodeling, and has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antioxidant, circadian rhythm regulation, and immune enhancement effects [141, 142]. The increased endogenous melatonin levels during pregnancy ensure normal pregnancy and fetal development and may regulate OTM by influencing bone deposition and resorption processes.

OTM relies on the coordinated absorption and remodeling of surrounding bone and periodontal tissue. The mechanical load applied to the tooth triggers an aseptic inflammatory response, leading to osteoclast activity in the compression area and osteoblast deposition in the tension area. Melatonin can promote the osteogenic differentiation of hPDLCs [143], increase the expression of inflammatory factors, and enhance collagen synthesis during mechanical strain [144]. Furthermore, melatonin directly stimulates osteoblast differentiation and proliferation, enhancing bone formation both in vitro and in vivo [145]. It can significantly inhibit local alveolar bone resorption and contribute to the healing of periodontal tissue [146].

Melatonin inhibits bone resorption in a number of different ways. Studies have shown that melatonin inhibits osteoclast differentiation and activation by increasing the OPG/RANKL ratio [147]. In addition to affecting PDLF, osteoblasts and osteoclasts, melatonin influences macrophage responses to mechanical strain. It converts macrophages from a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, inhibiting inflammatory factor expression [148].

During orthodontic treatment, removable appliances are mainly worn at night, and the orthodontic force is transmitted to the teeth through these appliances. Increased melatonin secretion at night may affect macrophages exposed to mechanical strain, reducing their pro-inflammatory response and benefiting periodontal tissue repair during OTM [148]. In contrast to macrophages, melatonin enhances the mechanical strain-induced expression of inflammatory cytokines in PLFs, which can compensate for the decreased cytokine production by macrophages in vivo [144]. Interestingly, studies have shown that although melatonin increases collagen synthesis and the expression of inflammatory mediators, it does not promote PDLF-induced osteoclast generation and cannot accelerate OTM [144]. This suggests that melatonin’s mechanism in affecting OTM may not be related to inducing genes involved in bone remodeling through PLFs. As melatonin affects the entire body, it may also indirectly influence OTM or PLFs through other mediators not discussed in this paper. Research on melatonin’s effect on OTM is still ongoing, with most studies limited to the cellular level. There is a lack of animal experiments to further verify melatonin’s impact on OTM under orthodontic force.

Melatonin plays a crucial role in regulating bone metabolism and ensuring normal pregnancy and fetal development. In bone remodeling, melatonin up-regulates the expression of osteoblast proteins and down-regulates the production of osteoclasts. Additionally, melatonin influences the expression of inflammatory cytokines in macrophages, periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs), and PLFs. These cytokines are vital in regulating inflammatory responses and bone resorption. During pregnancy, the elevated levels of melatonin further impact bone metabolism, suggesting that melatonin may be involved in the regulation of OTM during pregnancy. However, there is currently a lack of evidence on how fluctuations in melatonin levels during pregnancy affect OTM and whether orthodontic treatment influences melatonin levels in the body. Given melatonin’s importance in bone remodeling and pregnancy, future studies on its potential effects on OTM during pregnancy can better guide clinical assessments of the adverse side effects and risks of orthodontic treatment in pregnant women.

Effect of orthodontic treatment on hormone levels during pregnancy and lactation

Effect of orthodontic treatment on estrogen and progesterone levels during pregnancy

Hormonal changes during pregnancy can affect the rate of OTM by influencing bone metabolism. Concurrently, the application of orthodontic force impacts hormone levels during pregnancy. OTM promotes estrogen expression in the serum and local periodontal tissue of non-pregnant female rats [149, 150]. Although OTM increases estrogen levels in local tissues and the whole body, the overall rhythmic variation does not change [150]. However, during pregnancy, orthodontic force reduces progesterone secretion, with the most significant decrease occurring in the first trimester, followed by the third trimester, while still maintaining a gradual increase [75]. Similarly, microimplant loading (60 g) on the tibia of pregnant mice down-regulates progesterone and estradiol expression [151].

Stress is a critical factor affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis pathway. In non-pregnant female rats, orthodontic force increases estrogen levels [150], which seems inconsistent with findings that post-traumatic stress reduces hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activity [152]. The body’s stress response is closely related to the endocrine environment during stress. The stress response induced by OTM in non-pregnant rats may be less severe [150]. The decrease in estrogen expression due to orthodontic force during pregnancy aligns with the reduced activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis under stress, possibly due to a stronger stress response caused by orthodontic force during pregnancy.

Additionally, using orthodontic appliances increases TNF-α expression in the saliva of pregnant women [153], potentially affecting periodontal tissue health [154]. The use of various orthodontic appliances may hinder oral hygiene and exacerbate local inflammatory responses, altering local or systemic hormone levels. Existing research indicates that while corrective force during pregnancy affects hormone expression levels, the body compensates [151, 155]. Orthodontic treatment during pregnancy does not adversely affect the body but suggests that clinical caution is necessary.

Effect of orthodontic treatment on lactating estrogen level

The changes in hormone levels during lactation can regulate OTM, and the application of orthodontic force can also affect hormone levels in the body. Despite the reduction in estrogen secretion during lactation, orthodontic force can up-regulate serum estrogen levels, which promotes bone formation and helps mitigate the decrease in bone mineral density during this period, thus facilitating periodontal remodeling during lactation [7]. However, orthodontic force does not alter the overall pattern of estrogen changes during lactation, indicating that it does not interfere with the hypothalamus’s regulation of estrogen rhythms but only affects estrogen content locally [7].

Orthodontic force increases serum estrogen content, possibly due to a systemic stress response, while the increase in local estrogen levels is directly related to periodontal remodeling from local stress [150]. A Study suggest that applying orthodontic force within a certain range during lactation is safe, as it accelerates OTM and reduces the risk of root resorption [77]. The decreased bone mineral density during lactation lowers resistance to tooth movement but increases anchorage requirements, necessitating careful control to avoid anchorage loss. Therefore, close monitoring, force adjustment, and enhanced anchorage control are essential in clinical practice during lactation.

Root resorption induced by orthodontic force is a multifactorial complication in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment, associated with the magnitude and direction of the force, individual differences, and hormone levels. OTM increases the risk of tooth root resorption [156]. Estrogen inhibits bone resorption and promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and PDLSCs, affecting the speed of tooth movement and root resorption [157]. Estrogen promotes cementoblast proliferation, differentiation, mineralization and cementum formation by regulating Notch signaling pathway [19]. In vitro studies have shown that estradiol can increase the proliferation rate of human cementoblasts by 2.5 times and promote new cementum formation [158]. Estrogen deficiency can increase the rate and extent of dental root resorption by cementoblasts [159, 77]. In experiments involving the application of force to the molars of rats, it was found that the OTM speed was accelerated in the ovariectomy group, and varying degrees of resorption pits were observed in the proximal and distal roots [77], indicating that reduced estrogen under pressure promotes orthodontic root resorption. Lactation is characterized by low estrogen levels, yet studies indicate that OTM accelerates and reduces the risk of root resorption during lactation, contrary to the increased risk of root resorption due to low estrogen levels [77]. It is hypothesized that the risk of orthodontic root resorption increases only when estrogen levels drop below a certain threshold, and the overall bone turnover and density decrease during lactation. Orthodontic force feedback is associated with increased estrogen expression [7].

Oral health maintenance during orthodontic treatment

During pregnancy, changes in the systemic and oral environment, diet, and oral hygiene habits of pregnant women increase the prevalence of oral diseases such as gingivitis, gingival hyperplasia, and pericoronitis of wisdom teeth [160]. Hormonal changes during pregnancy elevate the burden on periodontal tissues during orthodontic treatment, making it crucial to control inflammation during tooth movement to prevent tissue destruction, which can manifest as orthodontic-induced root resorption and periodontal disease [161]. Pregnancy gingivitis, the most common periodontal disease during pregnancy, results from the release of proinflammatory cytokines (including IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β) due to increased progesterone and estrogen levels. Progesterone causes gingival capillary dilation and congestion, increases inflammatory cell and fluid exudation, exacerbating gingival inflammation caused by dental plaque. This hormonal effect enhances the gingival response to local irritants, worsening or altering the characteristics of pre-existing chronic gingival inflammation. Although histologically similar to gingivitis in non-pregnant individuals, gingivitis associated with hormonal changes during pregnancy is termed pregnancy gingivitis [162]. Gingival inflammation arises from both local and systemic factors; pregnancy is not the direct cause of gingivitis, but plaque microorganisms remain the primary cause of pregnancy gingivitis.

For patients undergoing orthodontic treatment during pregnancy, attention should be paid to both hormonal changes and oral inflammation. Neglecting oral hygiene and experiencing hormonal fluctuations during pregnancy often increase the incidence of oral diseases such as gingivitis. ERs are distributed in various tissues and are affected by hormone levels and oral hygiene, influencing the body’s inflammatory state. During pregnancy, the expression of ERα in the maxillary sinus and periodontal membrane of rats is significantly increased, and slight inflammatory changes are observed in these tissues [155]. The use of various orthodontic appliances increases the difficulty of tooth cleaning and creates more conditions for plaque retention [163]. Although the use of fixed orthodontic devices alone may not cause gingivitis, factors such as pregnancy and poor oral hygiene can lead to gingivitis. Maintaining good oral hygiene can improve gingivitis during pregnancy, and severe gingivitis should be treated aggressively [164].

The second trimester is recognized as the safest period for oral treatment because fetal differentiation and development are mostly complete, tissues and organs are maturing, the risk of teratogenesis is low, and the pregnant woman’s state of mind is stable [165, 166]. For pregnant patients without obvious contraindications, orthodontic revisit schedules are determined during the first and third trimesters, considering the actual situation of the pregnant woman and the fetus. In the latter half of the third trimester, chair-side operations should be shortened to avoid extreme supine positions, and complex and time-consuming treatments should be delayed until after delivery [167]. Ideally, tooth movement should not be performed during active gingival inflammation due to the increased risk of periodontal abscess formation [167]. For pregnant patients with signs of gingival inflammation, periodontal pocket formation, and poor oral hygiene, orthodontic treatment can exacerbate periodontal conditions, making it more sensible to postpone orthodontic treatment until after pregnancy. For patients with poor oral health who become pregnant during orthodontic treatment, it is recommended to terminate the treatment early and remove fixed appliances until the periodontal condition improves post-delivery.

Plaque control is crucial for orthodontic treatment during pregnancy. Before initiating orthodontics, existing periodontal problems must be addressed, and stringent oral hygiene maintenance should be implemented. This includes guidance on brushing, flossing, and using interdental cleaning tools, as well as professional periodontal treatment to remove local irritants and maintain optimal oral health [167]. Studies have reported that regular consumption of Lactobacillus reuteri lozenges is an effective adjunctive method to control pregnancy-related gingivitis [168]. Additionally, diet management and promoting oral health awareness play important roles in improving periodontal conditions during pregnancy.

Diet management

In addition to hormonal effects, adverse personal behaviors and changes in dietary habits exacerbate the deterioration of periodontal conditions during pregnancy [153]. Recent studies have shown that sweets and fast food can increase saliva acidity and affect the oral microbial composition, potentially promoting the growth of pathogenic bacteria [169, 170]. This underscores the need to focus on nutrition when improving the oral health of pregnant women. Dietary choices during pregnancy influence inflammatory processes, making nutrition a crucial factor in the systemic and oral health of both mother and child [171]. Nutritional deficiencies or snacking habits can lead to tooth decay, and excessive nutrient intake can cause overweight or obesity. Hormonal changes and rapid weight gain during pregnancy trigger metabolic inflammation, activating inflammatory processes throughout the body [172]. Weight gain or central obesity, influenced by diet and exercise, affects inflammatory conditions such as periodontitis [173], which is positively associated with increased IL-6 and TNF-α levels in the saliva of pregnant women with periodontitis [174]. Elevated TNF-α levels can affect infant weight [175], especially in obese pregnant women [176]. Meta-analysis by Shahi Anahita et al. [177] found that periodontal treatment could reduce the odds ratio of perinatal mortality and preterm birth by 88% and 31%, respectively. Active treatment of periodontal disease can effectively reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. A reasonable diet, cultivation of good eating habits, and proper weight control during pregnancy can improve periodontal conditions and support orthodontic treatment.

Promote oral health awareness

Lack of awareness of oral care and weak social support are significant factors contributing to the deterioration of periodontal conditions during pregnancy [178]. Surveys indicate that pregnant women generally have low awareness of the importance of oral hygiene during pregnancy, and only a small number have an oral examination before or in the early stages of pregnancy [179]. This lack of awareness and understanding of the importance of oral health has become a self-neglect factor for the worsening of periodontal conditions. Concerns about the safety of oral treatment during pregnancy, dental fear, and lack of awareness about the harm of oral diseases contribute to a low consultation rate for oral diseases among pregnant women [179]. Raising awareness of oral health care among pregnant women is crucial to avoid pregnancy-related adverse consequences due to gingivitis and periodontitis [180]. Additionally, women’s oral health has been shown to deteriorate further in the postpartum period [167], increasing the difficulty and risk of OTM. While there are basic studies on changes in bone metabolism and OTM during pregnancy and lactation, reports on how orthodontists should conduct orthodontic treatment for this group of patients are lacking [181]. Periodontal health is essential for successful orthodontic treatment, and orthodontic care must consider the oral health of pregnant women. As the demand for dental services among pregnant women increases, promoting clinical standards for prenatal oral health to maximize coverage is becoming increasingly important [182]. However, social support remains weak, and deficiencies in knowledge and practice of oral health care during pregnancy persist among stomatologists [182]. Higher education institutions need to improve the teaching of oral treatment for pregnant women and raise awareness among stomatologists to disseminate knowledge of oral health care during pregnancy [183]. Preventive oral care should also be promoted as part of antenatal care. Strengthening interdisciplinary cooperation between obstetricians and stomatologists is recommended to improve the periodontal health of pregnant women, effectively identify risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes, and provide timely and effective interventions [184]. Overall, improving the awareness of oral health care among pregnant women is key, and only by enhancing self-awareness and professional oral maintenance can periodontal health be protected during orthodontic treatment.

Conclusion

Hormone levels are closely related to bone metabolism, and changes in bone homeostasis during pregnancy and breastfeeding may influence OTM trends. A review of previous studies indicates that orthodontic treatment during these periods should consider the effects of bone density reduction, force value, and interval of return visits. After applying orthodontic force, the body produces a stress response, causing hormone level fluctuations, but there are no reports of adverse effects. Additionally, most data in this review are based on rodent studies, which have certain limitations and cannot be directly extrapolated to humans. Despite differences between basic research and clinical practice, these findings should be approached with caution. Clinicians should be aware that orthodontic patients may exhibit similar changes in bone remodeling during pregnancy or breastfeeding, which could have potential implications for clinical practice.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Kim Y. Study on the perception of orthodontic treatment according to age: a questionnaire survey. Korean J Orthod. 2017;47(4):215–21. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.4.215.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Onigbinde O, Sorunke M, Braimoh M, Adeniyi A. Periodontal Status and some variables among pregnant women in a Nigeria Tertiary Institution. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(6):852–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144876.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta K, Saify M, Mahajan H, Jain DK, Gupta N. Orthodontic Treatment considerations in pregnancy: an insight. J Orofac Res. 2012;2:91–4. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10026-1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Müller LK, Jungbauer G, Jungbauer R, Wolf M, Deschner J. Biofilm and orthodontic therapy. Monogr Oral Sci. 2021;29:201–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000510193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mishra PS, Marawar PP, Mishra SS. A cross-sectional, clinical study to evaluate mobility of teeth during pregnancy using periotest. Indian J Dent Res. 2017;28(1):10–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_8_16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carneiro RM, Prebehalla L, Tedesco MB, Sereika SM, Hugo M, Hollis BW, Gundberg CM, Stewart AF, Horwitz MJ. Lactation and bone turnover: a conundrum of marked bone loss in the setting of coupled bone turnover. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(4):1767–76. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1518.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu lianpeng. Changes of estrogen, bone mineral density during orthodontic teeth movement and the expression of IGF-1 in periodontal tissues of lactation rats. North China Univ Sci Technol, 2015.

  8. Mishra P, Marawar PP, Byakod G, Mohitey J, Mishra SS. A study to evaluate mobility of teeth during menstrual cycle using Periotest. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17(2):219–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.113078.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Peruga M, Piwnik J, Lis J. The impact of Progesterone and Estrogen on the tooth mobility. Med (Kaunas). 2023;59(2):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peruga M, Lis J. Correlation of sex hormone levels with orthodontic tooth movement in the maxilla: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Orthod. 2024;46(3):cjae025. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu X, Zhao Q, Yang S, Fu G, Chen Y. A new approach to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement in women: orthodontic force application after ovulation. Med Hypotheses. 2010;75(4):405–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2010.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lieske B, Makarova N, Jagemann B, et al. Inflammatory response in oral biofilm during pregnancy: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2022;14(22):4894. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel S, Kilburn B, Imudia A, Armant DR, Skafar DF. Estradiol elicits proapoptotic and antiproliferative effects in Human trophoblast cells. Biol Reprod. 2015;93(3):74. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.115.129114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dellinger TM, Livingston HM. Pregnancy: physiologic changes and considerations for dental patients. Dent Clin North Am. 2006;50(4):677–ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2006.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson JL, Johnson PM, Kister K, Yin MT, Chen J, Wadhwa S. Estrogen signaling impacts temporomandibular joint and periodontal disease pathology. Odontology. 2020;108(2):153–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00439-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan F, Zhang R, Wang G, Ding Y. Oestrogen receptors are involved in the osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells. Biosci Rep. 2011;31(2):117–24. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20100029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Q, Wang H, Huang Z, Han Q. Research progress on the regulatory mechanism of estrogen in periodontal ligament cells repair and the reconstruction of periodontal tissue. J Prev Treat Stomatological Dis. 2021;29(11):787–92. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang B, Xu J, Zhou Y, Mao J, Guan G, Xu X, Mei L. Estrogen enhances osteogenic differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem cells by activating the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(2):583–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao J, Zhou Z, Huang L, Li Y, Li J, Zou S. 17β-estradiol regulates the differentiation of cementoblasts via notch signaling cascade. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;477(1):109–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.06.028.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Omar M, Kaklamanos EG. Does the rate of orthodontic tooth movement change during pregnancy and lactation? A systematic review of the evidence from animal studies. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01223-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohammed AO, Kaklamanos EG. Effect of ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis on the amount of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review of animal studies. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(6):672–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. E LL, Xu WH, Feng L, Liu Y, Cai DQ, Wen N, Zheng WJ. Estrogen enhances the bone regeneration potential of periodontal ligament stem cells derived from osteoporotic rats and seeded on nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/poly(L-lactide). Int J Mol Med. 2016;37(6):1475–86. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2559.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Macari S, Ajay Sharma L, Wyatt A, Knowles P, Szawka RE, Garlet GP, Grattan DR, Dias GJ, Silva TA. Osteoprotective effects of Estrogen in the Maxillary Bone depend on ERα. J Dent Res. 2016;95(6):689–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516633154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wattanaroonwong N, Schoenmaker T, de Vries TJ, Everts V. Oestrogen inhibits osteoclast formation induced by periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56(3):212–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang G, Chen X, Yan Z, Zhu Q, Yang C. CD11b promotes the differentiation of osteoclasts induced by RANKL through the spleen tyrosine kinase signalling pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(12):3445–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Smith W, Hao D, He B, Kong L. M1 and M2 macrophage polarization and potentially therapeutic naturally occurring compounds. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;70:459–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2019.02.050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. He D, Kou X, Yang R, Liu D, Wang X, Luo Q, Song Y, Liu F, Yan Y, Gan Y, Zhou Y. M1-like macrophage polarization promotes orthodontic tooth Movement. J Dent Res. 2015;94(9):1286–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515589714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Zhang H, Sun W, Wang S, Zhang S, Zhu L, Chen Y, Xie L, Sun Z, Yan B. Macrophages mediate corticotomy-accelerated orthodontic tooth movement. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16788. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34907-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Enright S, Werstuck GH. Investigating the effects of Sex hormones on Macrophage polarization. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Amaro ERS, Ortiz FR, Dorneles LS, Santos MS, Barrioni BR, Miranda RM, Garlet GP, Teixeira MM, Szawka RE, Silva TA, Macari S. Estrogen protects dental roots from orthodontic-induced inflammatory resorption. Arch Oral Biol. 2020;117:104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Q, Zhang W, Sadana N, Chen X. Estrogen receptors in pain modulation: cellular signaling. Biol Sex Differ. 2021;12(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00364-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Talwar RM, Wong BS, Svoboda K, Harper RP. Effects of estrogen on chondrocyte proliferation and collagen synthesis in skeletally mature articular cartilage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(4):600–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yasuoka T, Nakashima M, Okuda T, Tatematsu N. Effect of estrogen replacement on temporomandibular joint remodeling in ovariectomized rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(2):189–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90337-9. discussion 196–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Asquini G, Pitance L, Michelotti A, Falla D. Effectiveness of manual therapy applied to craniomandibular structures in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2022;49(4):442–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Iodice G, Cimino R, Vollaro S, Lobbezoo F, Michelotti A. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder pain, jaw noises and oral behaviours in an adult Italian population sample. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(8):691–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fichera G, Polizzi A, Scapellato S, Palazzo G, Indelicato F. Craniomandibular disorders in pregnant women: an epidemiological survey. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020;5(2):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5020036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411970080030401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ivković N, Racic M, Lecic R, Bozovic D, Kulic M. Relationship between symptoms of Temporomandibular disorders and Estrogen Levels in women with different menstrual status. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018;32(2):151–8. https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.1906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dawson-Basoa ME, Gintzler AR. Estrogen and progesterone activate spinal kappa-opiate receptor analgesic mechanisms. Pain. 1996;64(3):608–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(96)87175-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Macfarlane TV, Blinkhorn AS, Davies RM, Kincey J, Worthington HV. Oro-facial pain in the community: prevalence and associated impact. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.300108.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. LeResche L, Sherman JJ, Huggins K, Saunders K, Mancl LA, Lentz G, Dworkin SF. Musculoskeletal orofacial pain and other signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders during pregnancy: a prospective study. J Orofac Pain. 2005;19(3):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01447.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mayoral VA, Espinosa IA, Montiel AJ. Association between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and pregnancy (case control study). Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2013;26(1):3–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Turner JA, Mancl L, Huggins KH, Sherman JJ, Lentz G, LeResche L. Targeting temporomandibular disorder pain treatment to hormonal fluctuations: a randomized clinical trial. Pain. 2011;152(9):2074–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Minervini G, Franco R, Marrapodi MM, Fiorillo L, Cervino G, Cicciù M. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in pregnancy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50(7):627–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Minervini G, Marrapodi MM, La Verde M, Meto A, Siurkel Y, Cicciù M, Russo D. The relationship between pregnancy and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) through diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) axis II evaluation: a case-control cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):342. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04009-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lei J, Yap AU, Zhang M, Fu KY. Temporomandibular disorder subtypes, emotional distress, impaired sleep, and oral health-related quality of life in Asian patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021;49(6):543–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nuriel-Ohayon M, Neuman H, Koren O. Microbial changes during pregnancy, birth, and Infancy. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01031.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Khosravisamani M, Maliji G, Seyfi S, Azadmehr A, Abd Nikfarjam B, Madadi S, Jafari S. Effect of the menstrual cycle on inflammatory cytokines in the periodontium. J Periodontal Res. 2014;49(6):770–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Massoni RSS, Aranha AMF, Matos FZ, Guedes OA, Borges ÁH, Miotto M, Porto AN. Correlation of periodontal and microbiological evaluations, with serum levels of estradiol and progesterone, during different trimesters of gestation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48288-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Adriaens LM, Alessandri R, Spörri S, Lang NP, Persson GR. Does pregnancy have an impact on the subgingival microbiota? J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):72–81. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sugiyama N, Uehara O, Kawano Y, Paudel D, Morikawa T, Nakamoto N, Kato S, Takayama T, Nagasawa T, Miura H, Abiko Y, Furuichi Y. Ingenuity pathway analysis of gingival epithelial cells stimulated with estradiol and progesterone. J Oral Biosci. 2024;66(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.job.2023.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Lapp CA, Thomas ME, Lewis JB. Modulation by progesterone of interleukin-6 production by gingival fibroblasts. J Periodontol. 1995;66(4):279–84. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.4.279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lapp CA, Lapp DF. Analysis of interleukin-activated human gingival fibroblasts: modulation of chemokine responses by female hormones. J Periodontol. 2005;76(5):803–12. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lapp CA, Lohse JE, Lewis JB, Dickinson DP, Billman M, Hanes PJ, Lapp DF. The effects of progesterone on matrix metalloproteinases in cultured human gingival fibroblasts. J Periodontol. 2003;74(3):277–88. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Veynachter T, Baudet A, Di Patrizio P, Bisson C, Clément C. Recurrent oral granuloma gravidarum during two pregnancies of a patient with orthodontic treatment: a case report. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(7):3980–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1971_21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Yuan G, Cai C, Dai J, Liu Y, Zhang R, Dai Y, Wen L, Ding Y. Progesterone modulates the proliferation and differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;87(2):158–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-010-9377-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. He Z, Chen Y, Luo S. Effects of pregnancy on orthodontic tooth movements: effects of progesterone on orthodontic tooth movements in pregnant rats. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1998;16(2):124–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gulson B, Taylor A, Eisman J. Bone remodeling during pregnancy and post-partum assessed by metal lead levels and isotopic concentrations. Bone. 2016;89:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Salles JP. Bone metabolism during pregnancy. Ann Dendocrinologie. 2016;77:163–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Krishan V, Davidovitch Z, Ramachandran R. Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Movement. Br Dent J Official J Br Dent Association Bdj Online. 2010;32(4). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.203.

  61. Almidfa NSS, Athanasiou AE, Makrygiannakis MA, Kaklamanos EG. Does the rate of orthodontic tooth movement change during the estrus cycle? A systematic review based on animal studies. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):526. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01875-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Nakamura T, Imai Y, Matsumoto T, Sato S, Takeuchi K, Igarashi K, Harada Y, Azuma Y, Krust A, Yamamoto Y, Nishina H, Takeda S, Takayanagi H, Metzger D, Kanno J, Takaoka K, Martin TJ, Chambon P, Kato S. Estrogen prevents bone loss via estrogen receptor alpha and induction of Fas ligand in osteoclasts. Cell. 2007;130(5):811–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Xu Y, Zhao T, Xu W, Ding Y. Periodontal microstructure change and tooth movement pattern under different force magnitudes in ovariectomized rats: an in-vivo microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(6):828–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bartzela T, Türp JC, Motschall E, Maltha JC. Medication effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135(1):16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ding Z, Li Y X, editors. Effects of estrogen on experimental tooth movement in osteoporosis rats. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000;35(1):55–57.

  66. Kim YS, Lee KS. Effects of pregnancy on alveolar bone turnover during experimental tooth movement in rats. Kor J Orthod. 2000;3:413–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hellsing E, Hammarström L. The effects of pregnancy and fluoride on orthodontic tooth movements in rats. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:223–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.3.223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. He Z, Chen Y, Luo S. Effects of pregnancy on orthodontic tooth movements: effects of progesterone on orthodontic tooth movements in pregnant rats. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1998;16:124–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Mo SX, Chen YX. Periodontal expression pattern of osteopontin mRNA induced by orthodontic tooth movement in pregnant and non-pregnant rats. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;25(3):302–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Ghajar K, Olyaee P, Mirzakouchaki B, Ghahremani L, Garjani A, Dadgar E, Marjani S. The effect of pregnancy on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(2):e351–355. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Graham JD, Clarke CL. Physiological action of progesterone in target tissues. Endocr Rev. 1997;18(4):502–19. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.18.4.0308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. oosti M, Basafa M, Eslami N. Progesterone effects on experimental tooth movement in rabbits. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2009;37(7):483–6.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lewko WM, Anderson A. Estrogen receptors and growth response in cultured human periodontal ligament cells. Life Sci. 1986;39(13):1201–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(86)90352-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Moller UK. Streym S,Mosekilde L.Changes in calcitropichormones,bone markers and insulin-like growth factorI(IGF-I)duringpregnancy and postpartum:a controlled cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(4):1307–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Shuixue MO. Effects of orthodontic tooth movement on the serum progesterone levels in pregnant rats. J Pract Stomatol. 2008;24(001):21–4. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2008.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wu D, Meng B, Cheng Y, Gan L, Huang P, Cao Y. The effect of risedronate on orthodontic tooth movement in ovariectomized rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;105:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Seifi M, Ezzati B, Saedi S, Hedayati M. The effect of Ovariectomy and orchiectomy on Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Root Resorption in Wistar rats. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015;16(4):302–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Yali Z, Bin Z, Yining Z, Stomatology SO. An experimental study on the moving rate of orthodontic tooth in postpartum lactating rats. Chin J Coal Ind Med. 2014;017(006):952–5.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Macari S, Sharma LA, Wyatt A, da Silva JM, Dias GJ, Silva TA, Szawka RE, Grattan DR. Lactation induces increases in the RANK/RANKL/OPG system in maxillary bone. Bone. 2018;110:160–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.01.032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Tan L, Ren Y, Wang J, Jiang L, Cheng H, Sandham A, Zhao Z. Osteoprotegerin and ligand of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB expression in ovariectomized rats during tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(2):292–8. https://doi.org/10.2319/031608-150.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Howes O. Bone mineral density and prolactin associations in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004;66(1):77–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-9964(03)00054-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Suntornsaratoon P, Wongdee K, Goswami S, Krishnamra N, Charoenphandhu N. Bone modeling in bromocriptine-treated pregnant and lactating rats: possible osteoregulatory role of prolactin in lactation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;299(3):E426–436. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00134.2010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Bernard V, Young J, Binart N. Prolactin - a pleiotropic factor in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(6):356–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0194-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Laleh A, Pamela D, Adams DJ, Tracey N, Joshua VH, Horowitz MC. Weaning triggers a decrease in receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappab ligand expression, widespread osteoclast apoptosis, and rapid recovery of bone mass after lactation in mice.Endocrinology, 2007(8):3875–86.https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-1467

  85. Clément-Lacroix P, Ormandy C, Lepescheux L, Ammann P, Damotte D, Goffin V, Bouchard B, Amling M, Gaillard-Kelly M, Binart N, Baron R, Kelly PA. Osteoblasts are a new target for prolactin: analysis of bone formation in prolactin receptor knockout mice. Endocrinology. 1999;140(1):96–105. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.140.1.6436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wongdee K, Tulalamba W, Thongbunchoo J, Krishnamra N, Charoenphandhu N. Prolactin alters the mRNA expression of osteoblast-derived osteoclastogenic factors in osteoblast-like UMR106 cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;349(1–2):195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-010-0674-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Seriwatanachai D, Thongchote K, Charoenphandhu N, Pandaranandaka J, Tudpor K, Teerapornpuntakit J, Suthiphongchai T, Krishnamra N. Prolactin directly enhances bone turnover by raising osteoblast-expressed receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand/osteoprotegerin ratio. Bone. 2008;42(3):535–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Seriwatanachai D, Charoenphandhu N, Suthiphongchai T, Krishnamra N. Prolactin decreases the expression ratio of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand/osteoprotegerin in human fetal osteoblast cells. Cell Biol Int. 2008;32(9):1126–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Shemanko CS, Cong Y, Forsyth A. What is breast in the bone? Int J Mol Sci. 2016;22(10):1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17101764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Schoenmakers I, Jarjou LM, Goldberg GR, Tsoi K, Harnpanich D, Prentice A. Acute response to oral calcium loading in pregnant and lactating women with a low calcium intake: a pilot study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(8):2301–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2280-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhou Y, Zhu X, Zhang M, Li Y, Liu W, Huang H, Xu Y. Association between dietary inflammatory index and bone density in lactating women at 6 months postpartum: a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1076. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7409-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Iglesias-Linares A, Morford LA, Hartsfield JK Jr. Bone density and Dental External apical Root Resorption. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016;14(6):292–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-016-0340-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Shoji K, Ohtsuka-Isoya M, Horiuchi H, Shinoda H. Bone mineral density of alveolar bone in rats during pregnancy and lactation. J Periodontol. 2000;71(7):1073–8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.7.1073.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang ZQ, Chen YM, Wang RQ, Huang ZW, Yang XG, Su YX. The effects of different levels of calcium supplementation on the bone mineral status of postpartum lactating Chinese women: a 12-month randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515003967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Olausson H, Goldberg GR, Laskey MA, Schoenmakers I, Jarjou LM, Prentice A. Calcium economy in human pregnancy and lactation. Nutr Res Rev. 2012;25(1):40–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422411000187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Ward KA, Jarjou L, Prentice A. Long-term effects of maternal calcium supplementation on childhood growth differ between males and females in a population accustomed to a low calcium intake. Bone. 2017;103:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Ciosek Ż, Kot K, Kosik-Bogacka D, Łanocha-Arendarczyk N, Rotter I. The effects of Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Fluoride, and lead on bone tissue. Biomolecules. 2021;11(4):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11040506.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Hassan MG, Chen C, Ismail HA, Zaher AR, Cox TC, Goodwin AF, Jheon AH. Altering calcium and phosphorus supplementation in pregnancy and lactation affects offspring craniofacial morphology in a sex-specific pattern. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2022;161(5):e446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Zhao Jue WH, Caixia Q. Study of bone metabolism in second and third trimesters of pregnancy and puerperal period in re-pregnant women. J New Med. 2023;54(10):734–8.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Glinoer D. The regulation of thyroid function in pregnancy: pathways of endocrine adaptation from physiology to pathology. Endocr Rev. 1997;18(3):404–33. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.18.3.0300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Sun L, Vukicevic S, Baliram R, Yang G, Sendak R, McPherson J, Zhu LL, Iqbal J, Latif R, Natrajan A, Arabi A, Yamoah K, Moonga BS, Gabet Y, Davies TF, Bab I, Abe E, Sampath K, Zaidi M. Intermittent recombinant TSH injections prevent ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(11):4289–94. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712395105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang W, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang J, Gao L, Yu C, Yan H, Zhao J, Xu J. Thyroid-stimulating hormone maintains bone mass and strength by suppressing osteoclast differentiation. J Biomech. 2014;47(6):1307–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Reseland JE, Syversen U, Bakke I, Qvigstad G, Eide LG, Hjertner O, Gordeladze JO, Drevon CA. Leptin is expressed in and secreted from primary cultures of human osteoblasts and promotes bone mineralization. J Bone Min Res. 2001;16(8):1426–33. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.8.1426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Gröschl M, Rauh M, Wagner R, Neuhuber W, Metzler M, Tamgüney G, Zenk J, Schoof E, Dörr HG, Blum WF, Rascher W, Dötsch J. Identification of leptin in human saliva. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5234–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.11.7998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Randeva HS, Karteris E, Lewandowski KC, Sailesh S, O’Hare P, Hillhouse EW. Circadian rhythmicity of salivary leptin in healthy subjects. Mol Genet Metab. 2003;78(3):229–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7192(03)00004-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Li S, Jiang H, Wang B, Gu M, Zhang N, Liang W, Wang Y. Effect of leptin on Marrow Adiposity in Ovariectomized rabbits assessed by Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42(4):588–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Mei L, Li M, Zhang T. MicroRNA Mir-874-3p inhibits osteoporosis by targeting leptin (LEP). Bioengineered. 2021;12(2):11756–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.2009618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Ducy P, Amling M, Takeda S, Priemel M, Schilling AF, Beil FT, Shen J, Vinson C, Rueger JM, Karsenty G. Leptin inhibits bone formation through a hypothalamic relay: a central control of bone mass. Cell. 2000;100(2):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81558-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Fukuda T, Takeda S. Secondary osteoporosis or secondary contributors to bone loss in fracture. Regulation of bone homeostasis by nerve system. Clin Calcium. 2013;23(9):1279–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Włodarski K, Włodarski P. Leptin as a modulator of osteogenesis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2009;11(1):1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Ruiz-Heiland G, Yong JW, von Bremen J, Ruf S. Leptin reduces in vitro cementoblast mineralization and survival as well as induces PGE2 release by ERK1/2 commitment. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(4):1933–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03501-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Schröder A, Meyer A, Spanier G, Damanaki A, Paddenberg E, Proff P, Kirschneck C. Impact of leptin on Periodontal ligament fibroblasts during mechanical strain. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13):6847. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Yan B, Wang L, Li J, Yang R, Liu Y, Yu T, He D, Zhou Y, Liu D. Effects of the multifunctional hormone leptin on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12(5):1976–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Fantuzzi G, Faggioni R. Leptin in the regulation of immunity, inflammation, and hematopoiesis. J Leukoc Biol. 2000;68:437–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Paddenberg E, Osterloh H, Jantsch J, Nogueira A, Proff P, Kirschneck C, Schröder A. Impact of leptin on the expression Profile of macrophages during mechanical strain in Vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810727.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Srinivasan B, Chitharanjan A, Kailasam V, Lavu V, Ganapathy V. Evaluation of leptin concentration in Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) during orthodontic tooth movement and its correlation to the rate of tooth movement. J Orthod Sci. 2019;8:6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_58_18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Goutam M, Manas A, Kashyap A, Verghese Y, Jaggi N, Pragna K. Association of Orthodontic Tooth Movement with Leptin Concentration in Gingival Crevicular Fluid. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022;14(Suppl 1):S971–973. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_805_21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Alaguselvaraj J, Selvaraj K, Bhaskaran P, Chidambaram SM, Rajasekaran T, Mani M. Leptin levels in Gingival Crevicular Fluid during orthodontic tooth Movement. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 2):S1174–1177. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_285_21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Jayachandran T, Srinivasan B, Padmanabhan S. Salivary leptin levels in normal weight and overweight individuals and their correlation with orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(5):739–44. https://doi.org/10.2319/120216-869.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Sar SK, Shetty D, Kumar P, Juneja S, Sharma P. Leptin levels in gingival crevicular fluid during canine retraction: in vivo comparative study. J Orthod. 2019;46(1):27–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312518820533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Bakar NA, Kamil W, Al Bayati L, Mustafa BE. Saliva leptin levels in tooth movement during initial stage of orthodontic alignment: a pilot study. Braz J Oral Sci. 2017;16:1–8. https://doi.org/10.20396/BJOS.V16I0.8651060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Siva Dharma D, Abu Bakar N, Mustafa BE. Evaluation of salivary leptin levels and its correlation with class I, Class II, and class III facial skeletal pattern: a prefatory study. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(4):647–52. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Panigrahi Andrikopoulou Maria K, Jaconia Giselle D, Gyamfi-Bannerman Cynthia SRM. Page-Wilson Gabrielle. Pregnancy-specific adaptations in Leptin and Melanocortin Neuropeptides in Early Human Gestation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:e5156–64. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Lin KC. Increase of maternal plasma leptin concentrations during pregnancy: comparison with nonpregnant women. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1999;15(11):640–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Masuzaki H, Ogawa Y, Sagawa N, Hosoda K, Matsumoto T, Mise H, Nishimura H, Yoshimasa Y, Tanaka I, Mori T, Nakao K. Nonadipose tissue production of leptin: leptin as a novel placenta-derived hormone in humans. Nat Med. 1997;3(9):1029–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0997-1029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Paul RF, Hassan M, Nazar HS, Gillani S, Afzal N, Qayyum I. Effect of body mass index on serum leptin levels. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011;23(3):40–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Thomas T. Leptin: a potential mediator for protective effects of fat mass on bone tissue. Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70(1):18–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1297-319x(02)00005-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Hamrick MW, Ferrari SL. Leptin and the sympathetic connection of fat to bone. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(7):905–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0487-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. von Bremen J, Wagner J, Ruf S. Correlation between body mass index and orthodontic treatment outcome. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(3):371–5. https://doi.org/10.2319/070612-555.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Karthikeyan BV, Pradeep AR. Leptin levels in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal health and disease. J Periodontal Res. 2007;42(4):300–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00948.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Shimozuma M, Tokuyama R, Tatehara S, Umeki H, Ide S, Mishima K, Saito I, Satomura K. Expression and cellular localizaion of melatonin-synthesizing enzymes in rat and human salivary glands. Histochem Cell Biol. 2011;135(4):389–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-011-0800-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Tordjman S, Chokron S, Delorme R, Charrier A, Bellissant E, Jaafari N, Fougerou C. Melatonin: Pharmacology, functions and therapeutic benefits. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017;15(3):434–43. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X14666161228122115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Reiter RJ, Mayo JC, Tan DX, Sainz RM, Alatorre-Jimenez M, Qin L. Melatonin as an antioxidant: under promises but over delivers. J Pineal Res. 2016;61(3):253–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Ejaz H, Figaro JK, Woolner AMF, Thottakam BMV, Galley HF. Maternal serum melatonin increases during pregnancy and Falls immediately after delivery implicating the Placenta as a major Source of Melatonin. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;11:623038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.623038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Carlomagno G, Minini M, Tilotta M, Unfer V. From implantation to birth: insight into Molecular Melatonin functions. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(9):2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Nakamura Y, Tamura H, Kashida S, Takayama H, Yamagata Y, Karube A, Sugino N, Kato H. Changes of serum melatonin level and its relationship to feto-placental unit during pregnancy. J Pineal Res. 2001;30(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-079x.2001.300104.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Joseph TT, Schuch V, Hossack DJ, Chakraborty R, Johnson EL. Melatonin: the placental antioxidant and anti-inflammatory. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1339304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1339304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Reiter RJ, Tan DX, Manchester LC, Paredes SD, Mayo JC, Sainz RM. Melatonin and reproduction revisited. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(3):445–56. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.075655.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Tamura H, Nakamura Y, Terron MP, Flores LJ, Manchester LC, Tan DX, Sugino N, Reiter RJ. Melatonin and pregnancy in the human. Reprod Toxicol. 2008;25(3):291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Iwasaki S, Nakazawa K, Sakai J, Kometani K, Iwashita M, Yoshimura Y, Maruyama T. Melatonin as a local regulator of human placental function. J Pineal Res. 2005;39(3):261–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.2005.00244.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Cutando A, López-Valverde A, de Diego RG, de Vicente J, Reiter R, Fernández MH, Ferrera MJ. Effect of topical application of melatonin to the gingiva on salivary osteoprotegerin, RANKL and melatonin levels in patients with diabetes and periodontal disease. Odontology. 2014;102(2):290–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0122-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Mark PJ, Crew RC, Wharfe MD, Waddell BJ. Rhythmic three-part harmony: the Complex Interaction of maternal, placental and fetal Circadian systems. J Biol Rhythms. 2017;32(6):534–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730417728671.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Sun H, Zheng M, Liu J, Fan W, He H, Huang F. Melatonin promoted osteogenesis of human periodontal ligament cells by regulating mitochondrial functions through the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane 20. J Periodontal Res. 2023;58(1):53–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13068.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Schröder A, Alefeld A, Forneck A, Spanier G, Deschner J, Proff P, Kirschneck C. Impact of melatonin on periodontal ligament fibroblasts during mechanical strain. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44(6):659–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjac013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Maria S, Samsonraj RM, Munmun F, Glas J, Silvestros M, Kotlarczyk MP, Rylands R, Dudakovic A, van Wijnen AJ, Enderby LT, Lassila H, Dodda B, Davis VL, Balk J, Burow M, Bunnell BA, Witt-Enderby PA. Biological effects of melatonin on osteoblast/osteoclast cocultures, bone, and quality of life: implications of a role for MT2 melatonin receptors, MEK1/2, and MEK5 in melatonin-mediated osteoblastogenesis. J Pineal Res. 2018;64(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12465.

  146. Arabacı T, Kermen E, Özkanlar S, Köse O, Kara A, Kızıldağ A, Duman ŞB, Ibişoğlu E. Therapeutic effects of Melatonin on alveolar bone resorption after experimental periodontitis in rats: a biochemical and immunohistochemical study. J Periodontol. 2015;86(7):874–81. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Ikegame M, Hattori A, Tabata MJ, Kitamura KI, Tabuchi Y, Furusawa Y, Maruyama Y, Yamamoto T, Sekiguchi T, Matsuoka R, Hanmoto T, Ikari T, Endo M, Omori K, Nakano M, Yashima S, Ejiri S, Taya T, Nakashima H, Shimizu N, Nakamura M, Kondo T, Hayakawa K, Takasaki I, Kaminishi A, Akatsuka R, Sasayama Y, Nishiuchi T, Nara M, Iseki H, Chowdhury VS, Wada S, Ijiri K, Takeuchi T, Suzuki T, Ando H, Matsuda K, Somei M, Mishima H, Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Funahashi H, Takahashi A, Watanabe Y, Maeda M, Uchida H, Hayashi A, Kambegawa A, Seki A, Yano S, Shimazu T, Suzuki H, Hirayama J, Suzuki N. Melatonin is a potential drug for the prevention of bone loss during space flight. J Pineal Res. 2019;67(3):e12594. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Paddenberg E, Forneck A, Widbiller M, Smeda M, Jantsch J, Proff P, Kirschneck C, Schröder A. Impact of melatonin on RAW264.7 macrophages during mechanical strain. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):13397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113397.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. ShenLanhua M, Lingna ZR. Effect of Orthodontic Tooth Movement on Estrogen Levels in Serum and local Periodontal tissues of rats. J Oral Sci Res. 2017;33(3):3. https://doi.org/10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Guo J, Zhao Q, Chen YX, Zeng XL. Effects of orthodontic tooth movements on serum and local estrogen expression. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2007;16(6):618–22. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7248.2007.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Bin Z, Li-Ming W, Jin-Yuan LI. Effect of micro implant anchorage loading on estrogen and progesterone in pregant rat. Lab Med Clin. 2015;2015(9):1259–12601263. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2015.09.031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Pitman RK, Rasmusson AM, Koenen KC, Shin LM, Orr SP, Gilbertson MW, Milad MR, Liberzon I. Biological studies of post-traumatic stress disorder. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(11):769–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Kurniawan FKD, Roestamadji RI, Takahashi N, Tedjosasongko U, Narmada IB, Surboyo MDC, Diyatri I. Oral microbiome profiles and inflammation in pregnant women who used Orthodontic Appliances. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(7):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10070118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Singla S, Gupta P, Lehl G, Talwar M. Effects of Reinforced oral Hygiene instruction program with and without professional tooth cleaning on Plaque Control and Gingival Health of Orthodontic patients wearing Multibracket Appliances. SAGE PublicationsSage India: New Delhi India. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301574219878947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Hassan GS, Helal MB, Ibrahim HF. Immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor alpha in the maxillary sinus, pulp, and periodontal ligament of adjacent teeth in late pregnancy in rats. Odontology. 2023;111(3):608–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00770-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Li T, Zhou Z, Wang H, Lv C, Zhang C, Tao G, Li X, Zou S, Duan P. Effects of estrogen on root repair after orthodontically induced root resorption in ovariectomized rats. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2020;158(2):247–e2631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Deng L, Guo Y. Estrogen effects on orthodontic tooth movement and orthodontically-induced root resorption. Arch Oral Biol. 2020;118:104840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104840.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Nuñez J, Sanz-Blasco S, Vignoletti F, Muñoz F, Caffesse RG, Sanz M, Villalobos C, Nuñez L. 17beta-estradiol promotes cementoblast proliferation and cementum formation in experimental periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2010;81(7):1064–74. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Ogawa S, Kitaura H, Kishikawa A, Qi J, Shen WR, Ohori F, Noguchi T, Marahleh A, Nara Y, Ochi Y, Mizoguchi I. TNF-α is responsible for the contribution of stromal cells to osteoclast and odontoclast formation during orthodontic tooth movement. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223989.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Thakur V, Thakur R, Kaur M, Kaur J, Kumar A, Virdi D. Pregnancy & Oral Health and Dental Management in pregnant patient. Innovative J. 2020;2020(11). https://doi.org/10.15520/JCMRO.V3I11.360.

  161. Li Y, Jacox LA, Little SH, Ko CC. Orthodontic tooth movement: the biology and clinical implications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(4):207–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Laine MA. Effect of pregnancy on periodontal and dental health. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60(5):257–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350260248210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Shukla C, Maurya RK, Singh V, Tijare M. Evaluation of changes in Streptococcus mutans colonies in microflora of the Indian population with fixed orthodontics appliances. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016;13(4):309–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.187876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Raju K, Berens L. Periodontology and pregnancy: an overview of biomedical and epidemiological evidence. Periodontol 2000. 2021;87(1):132–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Favero V, Bacci C, Volpato A, Bandiera M, Favero L, Zanette G. Pregnancy and Dentistry: A literature review on Risk Management during Dental Surgical procedures. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(4):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9040046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Silk H, Douglass AB, Douglass JM, Silk L. Oral health during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(8):1139–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767050902926954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Mukherjee PM, Almas K. Orthodontic considerations for gingival health during pregnancy: a review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2010;8(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2009.00383.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Schlagenhauf U, Jakob L, Eigenthaler M, Segerer S, Jockel-Schneider Y, Rehn M. Regular consumption of Lactobacillus reuteri-containing lozenges reduces pregnancy gingivitis: an RCT. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(11):948–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12606.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Jang H, Patoine A, Wu TT, Castillo DA, Xiao J. Oral microflora and pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16870. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96495-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Cho GJ, Kim SY, Lee HC, Kim HY, Lee KM, Han SW, Oh MJ. Association between dental caries and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62306-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. McCullough LE, Miller EE, Calderwood LE, Shivappa N, Steck SE, Forman MR, A Mendez M, Maguire R, Fuemmeler BF, Kollins SH, Bilbo D, Huang S, Murtha Z, Murphy AP, Hébert SK, Hoyo JR. Maternal inflammatory diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes: circulating cytokines and genomic imprinting as potential regulators? Epigenetics. 2017;12(8):688–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2017.1347241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Robinson DP, Klein SL. Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Horm Behav. 2012;62(3):263–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.02.023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Altun E, Walther C, Borof K, Petersen E, Lieske B, Kasapoudis D, Jalilvand N, Beikler T, Jagemann B, Zyriax BC, Aarabi G. Association between Dietary Pattern and Periodontitis-A cross-sectional study. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):4167. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13114167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Foratori-Junior GA, Pereira PR, Gasparoto IA, de Carvalho Sales-Peres SH, Storniolo de Souza JM, Khan S. Is overweight associated with periodontitis in pregnant women? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2022.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Machado V, Mesquita MF, Bernardo MA, Casal E, Proença L, Mendes JJ. IL-6 and TNF-α salivary levels according to the periodontal status in Portuguese pregnant women. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4710. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Foratori-Junior GA, Mosquim V, Buzalaf MAR, Sales-Peres SHC. Salivary cytokines levels, maternal periodontitis and infants’ weight at birth: a cohort study in pregnant women with obesity. Placenta. 2021;115:151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2021.09.018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Shahi A, Khosravi S, Rezvan F, Salehi A, Mahmoudi MB, Amiri A. Evaluation of the periodontal disease on oral microorganisms during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Transl Res. 2023;9(3):144–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. Rahmani A, Hamanajm SA, Allahqoli L, Fallahi A. Factors affecting dental cleaning behaviour among pregnant women with gingivitis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2019;17(3):214–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Radwan-Oczko M, Hirnle L, Szczepaniak M, Duś-Ilnicka I. How much do pregnant women know about the importance of oral health in pregnancy? Questionnaire-based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05677-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Kamalabadi YM, Campbell MK, Zitoun NM, Jessani A. Unfavourable beliefs about oral health and safety of dental care during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):762. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03439-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. JFernandes JL, Perazzo MF, Paiva SM, Martins-Júnior PA, Macari S. Orthodontic treatment during pregnancy, lactation, and postmenopausal period: a questionnaire development. Braz Oral Res. 2024;38:e013. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Byrd MG, Quinonez RB, Lipp K, Chuang A, Phillips C, Weintraub JA. Translating prenatal oral health clinical standards into dental education: results and policy implications. J Public Health Dent. 2019;79(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Wen X, Fu X, Zhao C, Yang L, Huang R. The bidirectional relationship between periodontal disease and pregnancy via the interaction of oral microorganisms, hormone and immune response. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1070917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1070917.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Raeesi SA, Matrooshi KA, Khamis AH, Tawfik AR, Bain C, Jamal M, Atieh M, Shah M. Awareness of Periodontal Health among pregnant females in Government setting in United Arab Emirates. Eur J Dent. 2024;18(1):368–77. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Plan Project of Guiyang Municipal Health Bureau (ZhuWeijian Technology [2022] -019); the Construction Project of Medical Biomaterials R&D Talent Base of Guizhou Province (RCJD2018-9); the Project to Cultivate Young Scientific and Technological Talents in Colleges and Universities of Guizhou Province (Zun Shi Ke He HZ Zi (2022) No. 423); the Guizhou Provincial Health Commission Science and Technology Fund Project (2024GZWJKJXM0828); the Zunyi Science and Technology Bureau and Zunyi Medical University Science and Technology Joint Fund (QianShiKeHe HZ Zi (2022) No.393).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.Y.J: Consulted the literature and wrote the initial draft.Q.S.Q: prepared Table 1 and consulted the literature. Z.Z.J, P.J.X. and L.J.G: Conceptualization, article conception. L.C.C and G.X.Y: Edited and reviewed manuscripts and provided supervision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Guan or Chengcheng Liao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Qian, S., Zheng, Z. et al. Consideration of hormonal changes for orthodontic treatment during pregnancy and lactation - a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 22, 106 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01281-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01281-z

Keywords