Skip to main content
Download PDF

Improvement of early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis via oxytocin receptor antagonist during frozen embryo transfer-a propensity score-matched study

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 22, Article number: 79 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dysfunctional uterine peristalsis seems to play a pivotal role in hindering embryo implantation among women diagnosed with adenomyosis. This research aims to investigate whether administering an oxytocin receptor antagonist during a frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle using a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol can enhance in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for infertile women affected by adenomyosis.

Methods

Between January 2018 and June 2022, our reproductive center conducted IVF-FET HRT cycles for infertile women diagnosed with adenomyosis. Propensity score matching was employed to select matched subjects between the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Following this, 168 women received an oxytocin receptor antagonist during FET, constituting the study group, while the matched 168 women underwent FET without this antagonist, forming the control group. We conducted comparative analyses of baseline and cycle characteristics between the two groups, along with additional subgroup analyses.

Results

The study group exhibited notably lower rates of early miscarriage compared to the control group, although there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed a negative correlation between the use of oxytocin receptor antagonists and early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis. Subgroup analyses, categorized by age, infertility types, and embryo transfer day, showed a substantial decrease in early miscarriage rates within specific subgroups: women aged ≥ 37 years, those with secondary infertility, and individuals undergoing day 3 embryo transfers in the study group compared to the control group. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on adenomyosis types indicated significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates in the study group compared to the control group among women with diffuse adenomyosis.

Conclusions

Administering an oxytocin receptor antagonist during FET may reduce the early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis.

Introduction

Uterine dynamics involve the rhythmic contraction known as uterine peristalsis, which generates endometrial waves throughout the menstrual cycle. During the luteal phase, the uterus typically maintains a calm state favorable for embryo implantation [1, 2]. Embryo transfer (ET) marks the critical final step of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Studies have shown that increased uterine contractile activity during ET in IVF cycles is linked to decreased chances of successful pregnancies [3,4,5]. A meta-analysis revealed a notable negative impact of heightened contraction frequency (> 3 contractions/minute) on pregnancy rates [1]. In a prospective cohort study, the non-pregnant group consistently exhibited a higher frequency of uterine contractions compared to the pregnant group [6]. Hence, heightened uterine contractions during embryo implantation significantly reduce pregnancy rates, with higher frequencies of contractions exacerbating this adverse effect.

Oxytocin triggers contractions by binding to oxytocin receptors, primarily boosting intracellular calcium and prostaglandin levels. This action results in contractions of the uterine myometrium, ultimately leading to labor and delivery [7, 8]. Oxytocin receptor antagonists, which mimic oxytocin but with a stronger receptor affinity, work by decreasing prostaglandin production and calcium influx into cells, thereby inhibiting uterine contractions [9, 10]. Although oxytocin receptor antagonists are commonly used for tocolysis [11, 12], their application in ET is currently under investigation. Some studies have demonstrated a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates with the use of atosiban during ET compared to controls [13,14,15,16,17], while others have not observed such benefits [18,19,20,21]. Randomized, double-blinded, controlled trials suggest that atosiban treatment during ET may not improve IVF outcomes in infertile women or those with recurrent implantation failure [22,23,24]. However, few studies have specifically focused on women with adenomyosis, a condition characterized by abnormal uterine peristalsis [25, 26].

Adenomyosis, characterized by the infiltration of endometrial glands and stroma into the myometrium, has been associated with adverse effects on IVF outcomes [27,28,29]. Dysfunctional uterine peristalsis appears to be a critical factor contributing to impaired embryo implantation in women with adenomyosis [1, 30, 31]. Therefore, we hypothesize that utilizing oxytocin receptor antagonists during ET could potentially enhance IVF outcomes in this population. However, there is a paucity of published research on this subject. Hence, our study aims to explore the effects of oxytocin receptor antagonist administration during frozen embryo transfer (FET) on IVF outcomes among infertile women with adenomyosis.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

The retrospective cohort study took place at the Reproductive Medical Center of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022. Approval for the study was granted by the Institutional Review Board at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (reference number: KSVGH23-CT5-06). Due to its retrospective nature, the need for consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Patient data were collected from electronic medical records and IVF treatment sheets during the specified period. The study enrolled infertile women diagnosed with adenomyosis who underwent IVF-FET cycles using a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol at our reproductive center. Inclusion criteria specified patients aged 30 to 45 years with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 18 to 35 kg/m2. Adenomyosis diagnosis was established via sonography conducted by a certified sonographer and subsequently confirmed by a physician based on the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria [32]. Ultrasound assessments were performed utilizing a Voluson E8 device (GE Healthcare, Chicago, U.S.A.) equipped with a transvaginal probe. Adenomyosis was further categorized as focal, diffuse, or adenomyoma, as described in prior literature [32,33,34]. Exclusion criteria included patients with uterine myomas, laparoscopic or sonographic evidence of endometrioma or pelvic endometriosis, congenital uterine anomalies, severe intrauterine adhesions, individuals undergoing preimplantation genetic testing cycles for aneuploidy (PGT-A), recipients of donated oocytes, husbands of patients undergoing testicular sperm extraction, cancer patients, and those lost to follow-up. A total of 470 cycles were included and allocated into either the study or control groups. The study group received an oxytocin receptor antagonist during the FET procedure, while the control group did not. The decision to administer the antagonist was based on individual patient consultation and preference following thorough discussions with a physician. If multiple cycles were performed by the same patient within the study period, repeated cycles were excluded. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to select matched subjects with balanced age, BMI, anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, and endometrial thickness between the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Following matching, 168 cycles in the study group and 168 cycles in the control group were analyzed. The study flowchart is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flowchart IVF, in vitro fertilization; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; BMI, body mass index; FET, frozen embryo transfer; HRT, hormonal replacement therapy; PGT-A, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; TESE, testicular sperm extraction

Full size image

Frozen embryo transfer protocol

All participants in this study underwent FET cycles following the HRT protocol with prior treatment using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. A single subcutaneous injection of 3.75 mg long-acting GnRH agonist (Leuplin Depot, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Yamaguchi, Japan) was administered on either Day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle. After 28 days, upon confirming a thin endometrium (< 5 mm) via transvaginal sonography, endometrial preparation began with daily oral estradiol doses ranging from 6 to 8 mg (Ediol, Synmosa Biopharma Corporation, Hsinchu County, Taiwan) alongside estradiol gel (Oestrogel gel, Besins, Drogenbos, Belgium). Following 14 days of consecutive administration, endometrial thickness was assessed through transvaginal ultrasound. Upon achieving an endometrial thickness of at least 8 mm, luteal phase support was initiated. This involved daily intravaginal application of 90 mg gel (Crinone 8% gel, Merck Serono, Hertfordshire, UK), daily oral intake of 30 mg dydrogesterone (Duphaston, Abbott, Olst, the Netherlands), and weekly intramuscular injections of 125 mg progesterone (Progeston Depot, Tafong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Changhua City, Taiwan).

Our reproductive medical center adopted a freeze-all strategy for infertile women diagnosed with adenomyosis, wherein all embryos underwent cryopreservation using the vitrification technique. Thawing and transfer of cleavage-stage embryos occurred on the 4th day after progesterone administration, while blastocysts were transferred on the 6th day. Day 3 embryo quality assessment followed the criteria established by the Istanbul consensus workshop, evaluating cell number, blastomere symmetry, fragmentation percentage, and the presence of multinucleation. The optimal number of cells in a day 3 embryo is typically between 6 and 10. Ideally, the cells should be of equal size, as significant asymmetry can indicate poor embryo quality. Fragmentation, the presence of anucleate cytoplasmic fragments within the embryo, is graded as follows: Grade 1: No fragmentation or very few fragments (< 10%); Grade 2: Moderate fragmentation (10–25%); Grade 3: Significant fragmentation (25–50%); Grade 4: Severe fragmentation (> 50%). Each cell should ideally have only one nucleus, as multinucleation is associated with chromosomal abnormalities and lower implantation potential. The embryo’s morphology is graded as follows: Grade A (Excellent): 6–10 cells, symmetric, < 10% fragmentation, no multinucleation; Grade B (Good): 6–10 cells, slight asymmetry, 10–25% fragmentation, no multinucleation; Grade C (Fair): <6 or > 10 cells, moderate asymmetry, 25–50% fragmentation, possible multinucleation; Grade D (Poor): <6 or > 10 cells, severe asymmetry, > 50% fragmentation, frequent multinucleation [35]. In this study, top-quality Day 3 embryos were defined as Grade A (6–10 cells, symmetric blastomeres, < 10% fragmentation, and absence of multinucleation). Assessment of Day 5 embryo quality utilized the Gardner and Schoolcraft scoring system, considering the degree of blastocyst expansion, inner cell mass morphology and trophectoderm morphology. The degree of blastocyst expansion is graded on a scale from 1 to 6: 1: Early blastocyst, where the blastocoel (fluid-filled cavity) is less than half the volume of the embryo; 2: Blastocoel is more than half the volume of the embryo; 3: Full blastocyst, where the blastocoel completely fills the embryo; 4: Expanded blastocyst, with a blastocoel volume larger than the early embryo and a thinning zona pellucida; 5: Hatching blastocyst, where the trophectoderm is starting to herniate through the zona pellucida; 6: Hatched blastocyst, where the blastocyst has completely escaped from the zona pellucida. The quality of the inner cell mass is graded as follows: A: Tightly packed cells, many cells present; B: Loosely grouped cells, several cells present; C: Few cells, appearing irregular or disorganized. The quality of the trophectoderm is graded as follows: A: Many cells forming a cohesive layer; B: Few cells forming a loose epithelium; C: Very few large cells. Top-quality Day 5 embryos were identified as Grade 3AA at least. Embryo transfer was performed under transabdominal ultrasound guidance. In the study group, intravenous administration of atosiban (Tractocile 7.5 mg/ml, Ferring, Kiel, Germany) comprised a 6.75 mg bolus before transfer, followed by continuous infusion of the remaining 30.75 mg in 100 mL of normal saline at a rate of 15.4 mg/h, totaling 37.5 mg over 2 h. Progesterone supplementation was prescribed for both groups until 10–12 weeks of gestation upon pregnancy confirmation.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome measure of this study was the live birth rates, defined as the delivery of a viable fetus beyond 24 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included miscarriage rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Miscarriage was defined as a loss of pregnancy occurring after visualization of fetal cardiac activity and before 24 weeks of gestation, with further subcategorization into early miscarriage (≤ 12 weeks of gestation) and late miscarriage (> 12 weeks of gestation). Clinical pregnancy was determined by the detection of fetal heartbeat at 6–7 weeks of gestation via transvaginal sonography, while ongoing pregnancy referred to pregnancies beyond 12 weeks of gestation.

Statistical analysis

Nearest neighbor matching with a caliper of 0.02 was applied to calculate the PSM for baseline parameters in a 1:1 ratio for the two groups. The normal distribution of continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Independent t-tests were employed for quantitative variables, while categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine independent effects, adjusting for covariates including age, BMI, duration of infertility, previous IVF attempts, types of infertility, AMH levels, endometrial thickness, day of ET, and the proportion of transferred embryos. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (Chicago, IL, USA), with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

Results

Table 1 presents a comparison of baseline and cycle characteristics among the study population following propensity score matching. No significant differences were observed between the study and control groups in terms of age, BMI, duration of infertility, previous IVF attempts, types of infertility, causes of infertility, follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, AMH levels. Additionally, endometrial thickness, day of ET, proportion of transferred embryos and proportion of at least one top-quality embryos transferred were similar between the two groups. Clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were also compatible between the two groups. However, the study group exhibited a significantly lower rate of early miscarriage compared to the control group (8.1% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.015).

Table 1 Baseline and cycle characteristics of patients with adenomyosis undergoing either atosiban administration or no administration during frozen embryo transfer
Full size table

As depicted in Table 2, a binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the influence of atosiban on early miscarriage rates among adenomyosis patients. Confounding factors including age, BMI, duration of infertility, previous IVF attempts, types of infertility, AMH levels, endometrial thickness, day of ET, and the proportion of transferred embryos were considered in this analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed a negative correlation between the administration of atosiban and early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis (adjusted OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.95, P = 0.040).

Table 2 Analyses of factors affecting early miscarriage rates in patients with adenomyosis using logistic regression
Full size table

The study population was subsequently stratified into subgroups based on age, types of infertility, and day of ET. In the subgroups stratified by age, as shown in Table 3, clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were similar between the atosiban and control groups for both age groups (≥ 37 years and < 37 years). However, in the subgroup of age ≥ 37 years, the atosiban group exhibited a significantly lower rate of early miscarriage compared to the control group (9.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.005). Regarding the subgroups stratified by types of infertility, as shown in Table 4, clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were not significantly different between the atosiban and control groups in either primary or secondary infertility subgroups. Nevertheless, in the subgroup of secondary infertility, the atosiban group showed a notable reduction in early miscarriage rates compared to the control group (13.1% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.043). For the subgroups stratified by day of ET, as shown in Table 5, the atosiban group demonstrated significantly higher live birth rates (39.6% vs. 25.2%, P = 0.025) and lower early miscarriage rates (4.3% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.001) compared to the control group for day 3 embryo transfers, but not for day 5 embryo transfers.

Table 3 Subgroup analysis of patients with adenomyosis stratified by age and atosiban administration
Full size table
Table 4 Subgroup analysis of patients with adenomyosis stratified by types of infertility and atosiban administration
Full size table
Table 5 Subgroup analysis of patients with adenomyosis stratified by day of embryo transfer and atosiban administration
Full size table

The study population was subsequently categorized into subgroups based on the types of adenomyosis. Due to the small population size (n = 20), women with adenomyoma were excluded from the analysis. Women with diffuse adenomyosis exhibited significantly lower rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth compared to those with focal adenomyosis (refer to supplementary Table S1). As illustrated in Table 6, the atosiban group displayed significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates (38.2% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.005), ongoing pregnancy rates (36.4% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.004), and live birth rates (32.7% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.011) compared to the control group for diffuse adenomyosis, but not for focal adenomyosis.

Table 6 Subgroup analyses (categorized by types of adenomyosis) of patients with atosiban or without
Full size table

Discussion

This retrospective cohort study with PSM aimed to explore the effects of oxytocin receptor antagonists on IVF outcomes among infertile women diagnosed with adenomyosis undergoing FET HRT cycles. The study revealed that the group receiving oxytocin receptor antagonists exhibited significantly reduced rates of early miscarriage compared to the control group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a negative association between oxytocin receptor antagonist use and early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis (adjusted OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.95, P = 0.040). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, types of infertility, and day of ET showed a significant reduction in early miscarriage rates in the subgroups of women aged ≥ 37 years, those with secondary infertility, and those undergoing day 3 embryo transfers in the atosiban group compared to the control group. Additionally, subgroup analysis based on adenomyosis types revealed significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates in the group receiving oxytocin receptor antagonists compared to the control group among women diagnosed with diffuse adenomyosis.

Adenomyosis, a benign gynecologic condition characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium, has been linked to adverse reproductive outcomes [29, 31]. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated a negative association between adenomyosis and IVF outcomes [20, 27, 28, 36, 37]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis on IVF outcomes, revealing lower rates of live birth (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53–0.82), clinical pregnancy (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.77), and higher rates of miscarriage (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.35–2.44) among women with adenomyosis compared to those without adenomyosis [20]. Other meta-analyses have also confirmed significant reductions in rates of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth, alongside a notable increase in miscarriage rates among infertile women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF [27, 28]. Moreover, Mavrelos et al. suggested that an increasing number of ultrasonographic features are associated with a decline in the clinical pregnancy rates in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF-ET [38]. Additionally, Stanekova et al. reported that adenomyosis is linked to an elevated risks of miscarriage, irrespective of maternal age and BMI, following euploid blastocyst transfer [39].

The exact mechanism underlying infertility in women with adenomyosis remains poorly understood. Various mechanisms have been proposed, including anatomical distortion of the uterine cavity, dysfunctional uterine hyperperistalsis, altered steroid hormone production, elevated inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress, as well as reduced expression of implantation markers and impaired endometrial receptivity or functionality [30, 31, 40, 41]. Dysfunctional uterine hyperperistalsis, notably prevalent in women with adenomyosis, significantly influences embryo implantation [1, 25, 26]. Adenomyosis is thought to disrupt the normal architecture of the myometrium and the junctional zone, leading to aberrant uterine peristalsis, thereby adversely affecting implantation and subsequent conception. This disruption impacts the transport of sperm and embryos, as well as endometrial function and receptivity [31, 42]. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that administering an oxytocin receptor antagonist during ET could potentially improve IVF outcomes for women with adenomyosis. Our investigation indeed uncovered a positive relationship between oxytocin receptor antagonist usage and decreased rates of early miscarriage among women with adenomyosis. In a randomized controlled trial involving women with endometriosis, the endometriosis cohort showed notably higher serum oxytocin and PGF2α levels, along with increased uterine contractions compared to the tubal factor infertile cohort [43]. Furthermore, women with endometriosis demonstrated higher clinical pregnancy rates and implantation rates in the atosiban treatment group compared to the control group (58.3% vs. 38.3%, and 41.0% vs. 23.4%, respectively) [43]. Nevertheless, additional large-scale prospective studies are crucial to substantiate these findings.

Subgroup analyses, categorized by age, infertility types, and ET day, revealed a significant reduction in early miscarriage rates among women with adenomyosis following the administration of atosiban within specific subgroups: women aged ≥ 37 years, those with secondary infertility, and those undergoing day 3 embryo transfers. The uterine microenvironment in women of advanced age might be more sensitive to uterine peristalsis, potentially explaining why atosiban administration during ET yields more favorable outcomes in women with adenomyosis and advanced age. He et al. documented markedly elevated serum oxytocin and PGF2α levels, accompanied by heightened uterine contractions in the third and subsequent ET groups versus the first and second ET groups [44]. This finding suggests that patients with multiple prior unsuccessful cycles might undergo more invasive procedures, potentially enhancing the endometrial autocrine/paracrine oxytocin/oxytocin receptor system and triggering increased uterine contractions during subsequent ET attempts. Consequently, uterine peristalsis may be more frequently induced during ET in women who have previously delivered a fetus, making atosiban administration during ET potentially more beneficial for women with adenomyosis and secondary infertility. After ovulation, uterine peristalsis decreases and the uterus enters a quiescent state during the mid-luteal phase, creating an optimal environment for embryo implantation [1, 2]. Therefore, uterine peristalsis might occur more frequently during day 3 ET compared to day 5 ET. This suggests that the administration of atosiban may yield more favorable outcomes in women with adenomyosis undergoing day 3 ET. Nonetheless, the findings from the subgroup analyses should be interpreted cautiously and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn based on these data alone. Further studies are warranted to validate these observations.

In the subgroup analysis based on types of adenomyosis, adenomyosis was primarily categorized into focal and diffuse types. Han et al. demonstrated that compared to patients with focal adenomyosis or tubal infertility, those with diffuse adenomyosis experienced poorer IVF outcomes, characterized by lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, and higher miscarriage rates [33]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that diffuse adenomyosis, as diagnosed by ultrasound, was associated with reduced live birth rates (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23–0.59) and clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34–0.75) [20]. Consistently, our study found that diffuse adenomyosis was associated with inferior IVF outcomes compared to focal adenomyosis (see supplementary Table S1). Moreover, our results indicate a favorable association between the application of an oxytocin receptor antagonist and heightened live birth rates among women with diffuse adenomyosis. Likewise, the results from the subgroup analysis should be approached with caution, as these data alone do not allow for definitive conclusions. Further larger prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

The current study presents several limitations that warrant consideration. Firstly, it is important to note the relatively small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, which may introduce inherent biases. Caution is advised when interpreting data from subgroup analyses due to the potential for biases stemming from the limited size of the population studied. Larger prospective studies are necessary to validate and reinforce the observed findings. Secondly, efforts were made to exclude women with sonographic evidence of endometrioma or pelvic endometriosis; however, the reliance on sonography alone may not have identified all cases accurately. Consequently, some women with both adenomyosis and endometriosis may have been inadvertently included, potentially introducing bias. Besides, embryo selection in our study relied on morphological grading rather than euploidy assessment, as PGT-A is not commonly utilized in our center. Therefore, the possibility of confounding effects from embryo aneuploidy should be considered. Moreover, the decision to prescribe an oxytocin receptor antagonist was influenced by patient preferences and individual considerations after extensive consultations with a physician, which may have introduced bias into the study.

In conclusion, the administration of an oxytocin receptor antagonist during FET may potentially decrease the early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis.

Data availability

Data is provided within a Additional file 2.

Abbreviations

AMH:

anti-Mullerian hormone

BMI:

body mass index

CI:

confidence interval

ET:

embryo transfer

FET:

frozen embryo transfer

FSH:

follicular stimulating hormone

GnRH:

gonadotropin-releasing hormone

HRT:

hormone replacement therapy

IVF:

in vitro fertilization

MUSA:

morphological uterus sonographic assessment

OR:

Odds ratio

PGT-A:

preimplantation genetic testing cycles for aneuploidy

PSM:

propensity score matching

References

  1. Kuijsters NPM, Methorst WG, Kortenhorst MSQ, Rabotti C, Mischi M, Schoot BC. Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(1):50–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rees CO, de Boer A, Huang Y, Wessels B, Blank C, Kuijsters N, Huppelschoten A, Zizolfi B, Foreste V, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. Uterine contractile activity in healthy women throughout the menstrual cycle measured using a novel quantitative two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound speckle tracking method. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46(1):115–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(7):1968–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu L, Che HS, Xiao L, Li YP. Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1238–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Javedani Masroor M, Younesi Asl L, Sarchami N. The effect of uterine contractions on fertility outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Cohort Study. J Reprod Infertil. 2023;24(2):132–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung CH, Wong AW, Chan CP, Saravelos SH, Kong GW, Cheung LP, Chung JP, Li TC. The changing pattern of uterine contractions before and after fresh embryo transfer and its relation to clinical outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(3):240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shmygol A, Gullam J, Blanks A, Thornton S. Multiple mechanisms involved in oxytocin-induced modulation of myometrial contractility. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2006;27(7):827–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arrowsmith S, Wray S. Oxytocin: its mechanism of action and receptor signalling in the myometrium. J Neuroendocrinol. 2014;26(6):356–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shubert PJ. Atosiban. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;38(4):722–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Melin P. Oxytocin antagonists in preterm labour and delivery. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;7(3):577–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vrachnis N, Malamas FM, Sifakis S, Deligeoroglou E, Iliodromiti Z. The oxytocin-oxytocin receptor system and its antagonists as tocolytic agents. Int J Endocrinol. 2011;2011:350546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandraharan E, Arulkumaran S. Acute tocolysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(2):151–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neumann K, Griesinger G. Is oxytocin receptor antagonist administration around embryo transfer associated with IVF treatment success? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(6):983–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Chen Y, Wang A, Zhang H. A meta-analysis of atosiban supplementation among patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(4):623–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tyler B, Walford H, Tamblyn J, Keay SD, Mavrelos D, Yasmin E, Al Wattar BH. Interventions to optimize embryo transfer in women undergoing assisted conception: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update 2022.

  16. Yuan C, Song H, Fan L, Su S, Dong B. The Effect of Atosiban on patients with difficult embryo transfers undergoing in Vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Reprod Sci. 2019;26(12):1613–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang R, Huang H, Tan Y, Xia G. Efficacy of atosiban for repeated embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1161707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Craciunas L, Tsampras N, Kollmann M, Raine-Fenning N, Choudhary M. Oxytocin antagonists for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;9:CD012375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ge C, Zhang B, Mao Y, Hong Z, Zhou C, Wang Y, Wang M, Ma L. Effects of atosiban on clinical outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a propensity score matching study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(3):1101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li X, Du Y, Han X, Wang H, Sheng Y, Lian F, Lian Q. Efficacy of atosiban for repeated implantation failure in frozen embryo transfer cycles. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Li J, Mo S, Lin Z, Shi Q. Atosiban application in fresh ET cycle is effective for women undergoing repeated embryo implantation failures, especially for advanced-age obese patients. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):23044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang CL, Li QY, Chen FL, Cai CT, Dong YY, Wu YY, Yang JZ, Zhao M, Chi FL, Hong L, et al. A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022;20(1):124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Buddhabunyakan N, Sothornwit J, Seejorn K, Buppasiri P, Salang L. Effects of atosiban on uterine peristalsis following frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;265:96–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng EH, Li RH, Chen L, Lan VT, Tuong HM, Quan S. A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients undergoing IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(12):2687–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rees CO, Thomas S, de Boer A, Huang Y, Zizolfi B, Foreste V, di Spiezio di Sardo A, Christoforidis N, van Vliet H, Mischi M, et al. Quantitative ultrasound measurement of uterine contractility in adenomyotic vs. normal uteri: a multicenter prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(5):864–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arena A, Zanello M, Orsini B, Degli Esposti E, Iodice R, Altieri M, Borgia A, Moro E, Seracchioli R, Casadio P. Uterine peristalsis in women affected by adenomyosis: a step towards functional assessment. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;165(2):666–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cozzolino M, Tartaglia S, Pellegrini L, Troiano G, Rizzo G, Petraglia F. The effect of uterine adenomyosis on IVF outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(11):3177–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Younes G, Tulandi T. Effects of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):483–e490483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moawad G, Kheil MH, Ayoubi JM, Klebanoff JS, Rahman S, Sharara FI. Adenomyosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(5):1027–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Qu M, Lu P, Bellve K, Lifshitz LM, ZhuGe R. Mode switch of ca(2 +) oscillation-mediated uterine peristalsis and Associated embryo implantation impairments in mouse adenomyosis. Front Physiol. 2021;12:744745.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pados G, Gordts S, Sorrentino F, Nisolle M, Nappi L, Daniilidis A. Adenomyosis and infertility: a Literature Review. Med (Kaunas) 2023, 59(9).

  32. Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecology: Official J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(5):576–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Han B, Liang T, Zhang W, Ma C, Qiao J. The effect of adenomyosis types on clinical outcomes of IVF embryo transfer after ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46(2):346–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Exacoustos C, Morosetti G, Conway F, Camilli S, Martire FG, Lazzeri L, Piccione E, Zupi E. New Sonographic classification of adenomyosis: do type and degree of adenomyosis correlate to severity of symptoms? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(6):1308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011, 26(6):1270–1283.

  36. Wang Y, Yi YC, Guu HF, Chen YF, Kung HF, Chang JC, Chen LY, Chuan ST, Chen MJ. Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sachs-Guedj N, Coroleu B, Pascual M, Rodríguez I, Polyzos NP. Presence of Adenomyosis impairs clinical outcomes in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med 2023, 12(18).

  38. Mavrelos D, Holland TK, O’Donovan O, Khalil M, Ploumpidis G, Jurkovic D, Khalaf Y. The impact of adenomyosis on the outcome of IVF-embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(5):549–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stanekova V, Woodman RJ, Tremellen K. The rate of euploid miscarriage is increased in the setting of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018(3):hoy011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mehasseb MK, Panchal R, Taylor AH, Brown L, Bell SC, Habiba M. Estrogen and progesterone receptor isoform distribution through the menstrual cycle in uteri with and without adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2228–35. 2235.e2221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pirtea P, de Ziegler D, Ayoubi JM. Endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(5):741–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Günther V, Allahqoli L, Gitas G, Maass N, Tesch K, Ackermann J, Rosam P, Mettler L, von Otte S, Alkatout I. Impact of adenomyosis on infertile patients-Therapy options and Reproductive outcomes. Biomedicines 2022, 10(12).

  43. He Y, Wu H, He X, Xing Q, Zhou P, Cao Y, Wei Z. Administration of atosiban in patients with endometriosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):416–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. He Y, Wu H, He X, Xing Q, Zhou P, Cao Y, Wei Z. Application of atosiban in frozen-thawed cycle patients with different times of embryo transfers. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(10):811–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No.386, Dazhong 1st Rd., Kaohsiung City, Zuoying Dist, 81362, Taiwan

    Po-Wen Lin, Chyi-Uei Chern, Chia-Jung Li, Pei-Hsuan Lin, Kuan-Hao Tsui & Li-Te Lin

  2. Department of Nursing, Shu-Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

    Kuan-Hao Tsui & Li-Te Lin

  3. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

    Kuan-Hao Tsui & Li-Te Lin

  4. Department of Biological Science, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

    Kuan-Hao Tsui & Li-Te Lin

  5. Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

    Kuan-Hao Tsui & Li-Te Lin

  6. Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan

    Li-Te Lin

Authors
  1. Po-Wen Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chyi-Uei Chern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chia-Jung Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pei-Hsuan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kuan-Hao Tsui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li-Te Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.H.T, P.H.L and L.T.L contributed to the conception and design of the study; P.W.L and C.U.C organized the database; C.J.L and L.T.L performed the statistical analysis; P.W.L wrote the first draft of the manuscript; L.T.L wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Te Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki regarding medical research involving human subjects. Additionally, it received approval from the institutional review board at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital under the identifier KSVGH23-CT5-06. All procedures were conducted in compliance with approved guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, PW., Chern, CU., Li, CJ. et al. Improvement of early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis via oxytocin receptor antagonist during frozen embryo transfer-a propensity score-matched study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 22, 79 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01255-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01255-1

Keywords

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us