Interindividual variation of progesterone elevation post LH rise: implications for natural cycle frozen embryo transfers in the individualized medicine era
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 21, Article number: 47 (2023)
The key to optimal timing of frozen embryo transfer (FET ) is to synchronize the embryo with the receptive phase of the endometrium. Secretory transformation of the endometrium is induced by progesterone. In contrast, detection of the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge is the most common surrogate used to determine the start of secretory transformation and to schedule FET in a natural cycle. The accuracy of LH monitoring to schedule FET in a natural cycle relies heavily on the assumption that the period between the LH surge and ovulation is acceptably constant. This study will determine the period between LH rise and progesterone rise in ovulatory natural menstrual cycles.
Retrospective observational study including 102 women who underwent ultrasound and endocrine monitoring for a frozen embryo transfer in a natural cycle. All women had serum LH, estradiol and progesterone levels measured on three consecutive days until (including) the day of ovulation defined with serum progesterone level exceeding 1ng/ml.
Twenty-one (20.6%) women had the LH rise 2 days prior to progesterone rise, 71 (69.6%) had on the day immediately preceding progesterone rise and 10 (9.8%) on the same day of progesterone rise. Women who had LH rise 2 days prior to progesterone rise had significantly higher body mass index and significantly lower serum AMH levels than women who had LH rise on the same day with progesterone rise.
This study provides an unbiased account of the temporal relationship between LH and progesterone increase in a natural menstrual cycle. Variation in the period between LH rise and progesterone rise in ovulatory cycles likely has implications for the choice of marker for the start of secretory transformation in frozen embryo transfer cycles. The study participants are representative of the relevant population of women undergoing frozen embryo transfer in a natural cycle.
The advent of vitrification and excellent cryo-survival rates, increasing elective single embryo transfers and preimplantation genetic testing cycles contributed to increasing use of frozen embryo transfers (FET), which now comprise the majority of embryo transfers in many countries. While FET can be done in an artificial or natural cycle (NC) the latter is gaining momentum as the preferred option for frozen embryo transfer (FET) driven by studies suggesting that livebirth rates are higher with improved maternal, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as compared to hormonal replacement (HRT) FET cycles [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
The key to optimal timing of FET is to synchronize the embryo with the receptive phase of the endometrium. Secretory transformation of the endometrium is induced by progesterone  and in artificial cycles (AC), FET is scheduled according to the start of exogenous progesterone, i.e., a blastocyst is ideally transferred on the 6th day of progesterone exposure . In contrast, detection of the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge is the most common surrogate used to determine the start of secretory transformation and to schedule FET in a natural cycle. Urinary LH kits are often used in a NC FET . The accuracy of LH monitoring to schedule FET in a natural cycle relies heavily on the assumption that the period between the LH surge and ovulation, i.e., progesterone rise and the start of secretory transformation, is acceptably constant.
It is a well-recognized phenomenon that the endocrine profile of menstrual cycles varies not only amongst women but also from cycle to cycle for any given female [11,12,13]. In research as in clinical practice, when describing the menstrual cycle the average of individual hormonal profiles is taken as normal with an accepted “normal” range without taking into consideration inter-cycle variability . It has been demonstrated that most hormone trajectories in individual women differ considerably from the mean hormonal curves and LH surges culminating in ovulation appear to be highly variable in timing, amplitude and duration [14,15,16,17]. Moreover, secretory transformation of the endometrium and preparation for the window of implantation is provided by progesterone exposure and, not LH per se . Hence, the timing of LH is used as an indirect marker of the timing of progesterone rise and the start of the secretory transformation to schedule FETs. Given the variation in the endocrine profile of a NC, LH may not serve as the best benchmark to schedule FET.
The present study investigates whether the time period between the LH rise and progesterone rise varies by employing both ultrasound monitoring of follicular growth and serial hormonal profile assessment in natural ovulatory menstrual cycles.
Materials and methods
Anonymized electronic medical records of all natural FET cycles conducted at a tertiary referral fertility clinic between 1st January 2017 and 31st August 2021 were screened retrospectively. Institutional local Ethical Committee approved the study protocol (REFA077).
Inclusion criteria were age 18 years to 43 years with regular menses between 26 and 34 days, a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kg/m2, having at least one euploid blastocyst available for transfer, and measurements of serum estradiol, LH and progesterone levels on three consecutive days until (including) the day of presumed ovulation as defined with a serum progesterone level ≥ 1 ng/ml . Each woman was included only with one cycle.
Monitoring natural cycle
Commencing on the second day of menses and intermittently throughout the patients’ NC ultrasound scans were performed to monitor follicular growth. Serial measurements of serum LH, FSH, estradiol and progesterone levels were commenced once a dominant follicle measuring ≥ 14 mm was identified to accurately determine the time of ovulation. The LH surge was considered to have begun when the concentration rose by 180% above the most recent serum value and continued to rise thereafter [18,19,20]. Progesterone concentrations of 1.0ng/ml and above were regarded as the confirmation for occurrence of ovulation, and this was designated as day 0, to schedule embryo transfer on the fifth day after progesterone rise, e.g., if progesterone rise was on a Monday, blastocyst transfer would be on Saturday (Fig. 1) [8, 18,19,20].
All blood samples used for this analysis were collected between 9am and 12am and assayed at ART Clinical Laboratory, Abu Dhabi, with an automated Elecsys® immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
ELECSYS® progesterone generation III assay was used to measure progesterone. The measuring range is 0.47-56.4ng/ml as per in -house validation). The Elecsys Estradiol III assay has a measuring range of 21.2-2593pg/mL (In-house validation). The Elecsys LH assay shows negligible cross reactivity with FSH, TSH, hCG, hGH, and hPL. The measuring range is 0.99-197mIU/mL (ART Clinical Laboratory In-house validation).
Continuous variables were defined with mean and standard deviation or median and quartiles depending on distribution characteristics. Categorical variables were defined with numbers and percentages.
Serum hormone levels were plotted across menstrual cycle days. Graphs were centralized on the designated “day 0”, i.e., the day of progesterone rise over 1 ng/ml.
Comparison of patient characteristics among women with different intervals between the day of the LH surge and day 0 were with t-test, Mann-Whitney U, or derivatives of chi-squared tests determined by variable and distribution characteristics.
102 women had serial hormonal measurements on the three consecutive days ending in ovulation, day − 2, day − 1 and day 0 (the day of confirmed ovulation by serum progesterone levels ≥ 1 ng/ml). Three distinct patterns of ovulation, defined with the period between LH rise and progesterone rise were identified among these 102 women. Twenty-one (20.6%) women had the LH rise 2 days prior to ovulation (day − 2), 71 (69.6%) had on the day immediately preceding ovulation (day − 1) and 10 (9.8%) attained the LH peak on the day of ovulation (Day 0) (Fig. 2).
Based on these observations, if FET was scheduled based on LH rise, 30.4% of the patients would have their FET scheduled on a different day than FET scheduled according to progesterone rise, since the period between LH rise and progesterone rise would be approximately one day longer in 20.6% of the participants and one day shorter in 9.8%, than the anticipated 24 h period.
While women with LH rise on different days in relation to ovulation were similarly aged, women who had LH rise 2 days before ovulation had significantly higher BMI and significantly lower AMH than women who had LH rise on the same day with ovulation (Table 1).
Using a combination of ultrasound monitoring and serial hormonal profiling three distinct patterns of LH rise were identified in relation to ovulation defined as increasing serum progesterone levels ≥ 1 ng/ml corroborating the phenomenon of cycle variability.
Alliende prospectively studied 82 cycles of 25 women . Participants were proven fertile, had ovulation documented by the Billing ovulation peak method [21, 22] and biphasic basal body (BBT) temperature pattern in the previous six cycles before recruitment, and all the 82 cycles studied were also ovulatory as documented by the same two methods. The participants collected early morning urine samples starting from the first day of the cycle, for analyses of estrone glucuronide (EG), LH and pregnanediol glucuronide (PG) levels with noncompetitive radioimmunoassay. In 77% of the 82 cycles at least one hormone displayed a different pattern than the mean curves. In particular, LH pattern was different than the mean curve in 56% of the cycles. The LH peak was defined as “the highest LH numerical value, close to the EG peak and the PG increase”. Importantly, small LH peaks, defined as “LH surge smaller than LH peak, before or after the LH peak; also close to the EG peak and the PG increase” were detected in 19% of the cycles. Importantly, clinical periovulatory indicators (ovulation method peak and BBT) were associated with small LH peaks rather than the LH peak proper in 60% of cycles with small LH peaks. Since these small LH peaks were lower than the LH peak proper, by 29 IU/L/24 h on average (range 11–52 IU/L), it is possible that some may go unrecognized by commercially available urinary LH kits, leading to missing the time when progesterone starts to increase, hence the start of secretory transformation. Moreover, pre-peak and post-peak LH surges, defined as “LH surge is not close to the EG peak and the PG increase” were identified in 22% of the cycles. Such pre-peak LH surges can also lead to incorrect estimation of the time of ovulation and progesterone increase and the start of secretory transformation, with implications for timing of FET in a NC. These findings are on par with our present findings and others which also demonstrated variation between individual women’s hormonal curves and mean curves generated based on aggregate data [14,15,16,17]. Collectively these observations suggest that LH per se may not be the best indicator of the time of ovulation, as determined by progesterone rise.
In contrast, a 1980 study included 107 women during the periovulatory period, who provided serial blood samples and the mature follicle or the corpus luteum was removed at laparotomy for histologic examination in order to investigate temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the plasma concentrations of estradiol, LH, follicle stimulating hormone, and progesterone . Based on a statistical model, the concentration of circulating LH was reported to be the best indirect parameter of ovulation at a given time in relation to the interval from a defined rise or peak in the concentration of a circulating hormone. The estimated median time interval (95% confidence intervals) from the LH rise was 32.0 (23.6 to 38.2) hours and from the LH peak was 16.5 (9.5 to 23.0) hours by the model. The final model for LH suggested that it was possible to estimate in only 90% of the cases that ovulation had occurred between 16 (± 6) and 48 (± 6) hours after the first significant rise in the LH concentration and between − 3 (± 5) and 36 (± 5) hours after the LH peak. However, an examination of the results of individual women showed corresponding ranges of between 24 and 56 h from the first significant rise in LH and between 8 and 40 h after the peak. While these results, which show variation by more than a day, could have been viewed as the best available estimates 42 years ago, they can be regarded as inaccurate in today’s individualized medicine era. The ranges of the periods between changes in LH concentration, i.e., either the first increase or the peak, and ovulation in individual women’s data extend over 24 h, which suggests that if FET is scheduled solely based on LH concentrations, in some women, a blastocyst could be transferred on a different day than the targeted 5th day after ovulation, i.e., start of secretory transformation, leading to lower implantation or higher miscarriage rates . Indeed, our observation of varying periods between LH rise and progesterone rise confirm that such an error is possible in daily practice if FET is scheduled based on change in LH concentrations.
Other limitations of currently used LH tests, in particular urinary LH kits, which are commonly used in daily practice for scheduling FET include false negativity, delay in urinary LH rise by nearly 24 h after serum LH rise due to urinary clearance of LH, varying period between detection of urinary LH and observation of follicular collapse by ultrasound, and even seasonal variation in timing of LH detection in urine samples [1, 20, 24,25,26]. In addition urinary LH kits may demonstrate LH surges in the absence of ovulation [27, 28]. Notably a high percentage of normally cycling women may demonstrate premature LH surges which do not trigger ovulation . Moreover, a marked inter-personal variation in the time interval between the onset of the detected urine LH surge and ovulation has been seen, ranging from 22 to 56 h .
Ambiguity surrounds the definition of an LH surge, even if serum LH levels are monitored rather than urinary levels. Various values from 1.8 to 6 fold increase in LH levels from the baseline LH measurements have been used to define the onset of the LH surge, and even the definition of baseline LH level used as the benchmark for the fold increase varies in the literature [10, 15, 17, 19, 29,30,31,32,33,34]. Absolute value based definitions of the LH surge also vary, e.g., the attainment of LH ≥ 17 mIU/ml during the follicular phase with a ≥ 30% drop in E2 levels the following day ; LH > 10 mIU/ml ; LH > 15 mIU/ml  and LH > 20mIU/ml [37, 38].
While ultrasound monitoring of follicle growth and collapse can be considered as another method of determining the time of ovulation, the issue with using ultrasound confirmation of dominant follicle disappearance as the sole criterion for defining “ovulation” lies in the fact that different patterns of follicular fluid evacuation during ovulation have been described. It is important to note, that in some cases fluid remains in the former follicle even into the luteal phase . As such the detection of dominant follicle disappearance in isolation may not be the most reliable sign of ovulation. The key to optimal timing of frozen embryo transfer is to synchronise the embryo with the receptive phase of the endometrium. We prefer to use the rise in progesterone, which initiates secretory transformation, as the benchmark for timing of embryo transfer in a natural cycle.
Data on the efficacy and timing of embryo transfer in “true“ NC-FET are limited. Previous studies have focused for the most part on modified natural cycles using human chorionic gonadotrophin to induce ovulation of the dominant follicle which has been shown to be inferior to a spontaneous natural cycle for planning of frozen- thawed embryo transfer [19, 40]. Administration of hCG in the late follicular phase induces changes in the endometrium, which would have occurred several days later in a natural cycle . In addition, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and LH act on the endometrium through the same receptor and it has been suggested that their simultaneous presence may have an adverse effect on pregnancy rates [19, 41].
The observational design of the current study can be considered a limitation of the present work, yet this is a descriptive study and there have been no interventions that can affect serum hormone levels. As such we believe our observations represent an unbiased account of the temporal relationship between LH and progesterone increase in a natural menstrual cycle, in a relevant population of women who were undergoing a NC FET, to whom the results are meant to be extrapolated.
While large fluctuations in serum progesterone levels due to the pulsatile secretion by the corpus luteum can render once daily measurement less reliable in the luteal phase, the major source of progesterone in the follicular phase is from the adrenal gland and the range of fluctuation is very low . Since monitoring ends when progesterone levels exceed 1 ng/ml, we do not think the limited fluctuation in serum progesterone would significantly effect the identification of preovulatory serum progesterone rise.
Since we always scheduled FET according to serum progesterone but not to LH levels, our study does not provide a direct answer to the question whether FET scheduled according to serum progesterone levels provides higher live birth rates than FET scheduled based on urinary or serum LH levels in a natural cycle. Yet, given the above concerns and the three clearly different temporal relationships between LH and progesterone rise observed in our series collectively suggest that scheduling FET according to serum progesterone levels per se rather than its imperfect indirect surrogate LH levels can be a better choice in the current individualized medicine era. Undeniably, the initiation of the secretory transformation of the endometrium and preparing the window of implantation is initiated by progesterone exposure and not by systemic LH levels.
Our observation of women who had LH increase two days before progesterone rise having significantly higher BMI and significantly lower AMH values than women having both on the same day, would require further study to determine whether relying on progesterone levels can be particularly beneficial for women with high BMI and or decreased ovarian reserve. Using the progesterone rise as the benchmark for ovulation requires the availability of same day testing, results in increased costs, i.e., additional clinic visits and loss of working time as opposed to simple urinary LH testing at home. Whether these are justified by better synchronization of the embryo and the endometrium and higher live birth rates remains to be determined by a properly designed and adequately sized randomized controlled trial comparing NC FET based on LH vs. progesterone testing which would provide the definitive answer. The trial should include adequate numbers of women in different categories of BMI and AMH levels.
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article are available on request but have not been made available publicly.
Mumusoglu S, Polat M, Ozbek IY, Bozdag G, Papanikolaou EG, Esteves SC, et al. Preparation of the Endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:688237.
Wu H, Zhou P, Lin X, Wang S, Zhang S. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(8):1913–26.
Litzky JF, Boulet SL, Esfandiari N, Zhang Y, Kissin DM, Theiler RN, et al. Effect of frozen/thawed embryo transfer on birthweight, macrosomia, and low birthweight rates in US singleton infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(4):433e1–10.
Ginström Ernstad E, Wennerholm U-B, Khatibi A, Petzold M, Bergh C. Neonatal and maternal outcome after frozen embryo transfer: increased risks in programmed cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):126.e1-126.e18.
Makhijani R, Bartels C, Godiwala P, Bartolucci A, Nulsen J, Grow D, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in programmed versus natural vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(2):300–8.
Asserhøj LL, Spangmose AL, Aaris Henningsen A-K, Clausen TD, Ziebe S, Jensen RB, et al. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in 1,136 singleton pregnancies conceived after programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with natural cycle FET. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(4):947–56.
Hu K-L, Zhang D, Li R. Endometrium preparation and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing single-blastocyst transfer in frozen cycles. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(6):1487–94.
Chetkowski RJ, Kiltz RJ, Salyer WR. In premature luteinization, progesterone induces secretory transformation of the endometrium without impairment of embryo viability. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(2):292–7.
Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, van de Vijver A, Racca A, Van Landuyt L. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(11):2234–42.
Erden M, Mumusoglu S, Polat M, Yarali Ozbek I, Esteves SC, Humaidan P, et al. The LH surge and ovulation re-visited: a systematic review and meta-analysis and implications for true natural cycle frozen thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2022;28(5):717–32.
World Health Organization, Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period., Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138(4):383–90. Temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the concentration of plasma estradiol-17 beta, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone. I. Probit analysis.
Lenton EA, Landgren BM, Sexton L, Harper R. Normal variation in the length of the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effect of chronological age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91(7):681–4.
Cole LA, Ladner DG, Byrn FW. The normal variabilities of the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(2):522–7.
Alliende ME. Mean versus individual hormonal profiles in the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(1):90–5.
Park SJ, Goldsmith LT, Skurnick JH, Wojtczuk A, Weiss G. Characteristics of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge in young ovulatory women. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):684–90.
Alliende ME. Luteinizing hormone surge in normally ovulating women. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):e14–15.
Direito A, Bailly S, Mariani A, Ecochard R. Relationships between the luteinizing hormone surge and other characteristics of the menstrual cycle in normally ovulating women. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):279–285e3.
Irani M, Robles A, Gunnala V, Reichman D, Rosenwaks Z. Optimal parameters for determining the LH surge in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers. J Ovarian Res. 2017;10(1):70.
Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2054–8.
Testart J, Frydman R, Feinstein MC, Thebault A, Roger M, Scholler R. Interpretation of plasma luteinizing hormone assay for the collection of mature oocytes from women: definition of a luteinizing hormone surge-initiating rise. Fertil Steril. 1981;36(1):50–4.
Billings JJ. Natural family planning. Med J Aust. 1978;2(9):436.
Mena P, Alliende ME, Jensen L, Barros ML, Morande V, Castillo L, et al. [Methodology of teaching natural methods of birth regulation (special reference to the billings ovulation method]. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1984;49(3):187–98.
van de Vijver A, Polyzos NP, Van Landuyt L, Mackens S, Stoop D, Camus M, et al. What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1097–104.
Ghazeeri GS, Vongprachanh P, Kutteh WH. The predictive value of five different urinary LH kits in detecting the LH surge in regularly menstruating women. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2000;45(5):321–6.
Testart J, Frydman R, Roger M. Seasonal influence of diurnal rhythms in the onset of the plasma luteinizing hormone surge in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;55(2):374–7.
Frydman R, Testart J, Feinstein MC, Roger M. Interrelationship of plasma and urinary luteinizing hormone preovulatory surge. J Steroid Biochem. 1984;20(2):617–9.
Miller PB, Soules MR. The usefulness of a urinary LH kit for ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(1):13–7.
Krotz S, McKenzie LJ, Cisneros P, Buster J, Amato P, Carson S. Prevalence of premature urinary luteinizing hormone surges in women with regular menstrual cycles and its effect on implantation of frozen-thawed embryos. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(6):1742–4.
Hoff JD, Quigley ME, Yen SS. Hormonal dynamics at midcycle: a reevaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(4):792–6.
Johansson ED, Wide L, Gemzell C. Luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone in plasma and LH and oestrogens in urine during 42 normal menstrual cycles. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1971;68(3):502–12.
Kesner JS, Knecht EA, Krieg EF, Wilcox AJ, O’Connor JF. Detecting pre-ovulatory luteinizing hormone surges in urine. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(1):15–21.
Reutman SR, LeMasters GK, Kesner JS, Shukla R, Krieg EF, Knecht EA, et al. Urinary reproductive hormone level differences between african american and caucasian women of reproductive age. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(2):383–91.
Wetzels LC, Hoogland HJ. Relation between ultrasonographic evidence of ovulation and hormonal parameters: luteinizing hormone surge and initial progesterone rise. Fertil Steril. 1982;37(3):336–41.
Moghissi KS, Syner FN, Evans TN. A composite picture of the menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;114(3):405–18.
Groenewoud ER, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. Spontaneous LH surges prior to HCG administration in unstimulated-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer do not influence pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(2):191–6.
Kahraman S, Sahin Y. Is there a critical LH level for hCG trigger after the detection of LH surge in modified natural frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(12):3025–31.
Bartels CB, Ditrio L, Grow DR, O’Sullivan DM, Benadiva CA, Engmann L, et al. The window is wide: flexible timing for vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in natural cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39(2):241–8.
Johal JK, Bavan B, Zhang W, Gardner RM, Lathi RB, Milki AA. The impact of timing modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer based on spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(1):219–25.
Hanna MD, Chizen DR, Pierson RA. Characteristics of follicular evacuation during human ovulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4(6):488–93.
Gia Linh An B, Chapman M, Tilia L, Venetis C. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2022 Nov 24;37 (12): 2797–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac227.
Zimmermann G, Ackermann W, Alexander H. Epithelial human chorionic gonadotropin is expressed and produced in human secretory endometrium during the normal menstrual cycle. Biol Reprod. 2009;80(5):1053–65. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.069575.
Progesterone serum levels during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle originate from the crosstalk between the ovaries and the adrenal cortex, De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Huber PR. Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(4):933–9.
No funding was received for this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Institutional local Ethical Committee approved the study protocol (REFA077). ART Fertility Clinic Ethics Committee. Study Protocol 2108-ABU-011-CC.
Consent for publication
All authors agree to submission of this manuscript to the Journal Reproductive Biology & Endocrinology. Consent to Publish from patients is not applicable to our study.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of Interest
All authors state that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Coughlan, C., Ata, B., Gallego, R.D. et al. Interindividual variation of progesterone elevation post LH rise: implications for natural cycle frozen embryo transfers in the individualized medicine era. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 21, 47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01096-4
- Luteinizing hormone
- Assisted reproduction
- Menstrual cycle