Skip to main content
Download PDF

Concentrations of oocyte secreted GDF9 and BMP15 decrease with MII transition during human IVM

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 20, Article number: 126 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The suggested effects of the oocyte secreted GDF9 and BMP15 growth factors on oocyte maturation are currently based on recombinant proteins, and little is known about native GDF9 and BMP15 in humans.

Methods

Human immature cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained in connection with ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) underwent in vitro maturation (IVM). Oocyte-produced GDF9 and BMP15 were detected in COCs using immunofluorescence, and in fresh GV oocytes and in GV and MII oocytes after IVM by western blot. Concentrations of GDF9, BMP15 homodimers, and GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer in spent media after IVM were measured by ELISA. The relative expression of seven genes from the GDF9 and BMP15 signaling pathways (BMPR2, ALK5, ALK6, SMAD1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD5) was evaluated in fresh cumulus cells (before IVM) and in cumulus cells from GV and MII oocytes after IVM by RT-qPCR.

Results

We detected native pro-mature GDF9 and BMP15 in human oocytes with molecular weights (Mw) of 47 kDa and 43 kDa, respectively. Concentrations of GDF9 and BMP15 in spent media after IVM were detected in 99% and 64% of the samples, respectively. The GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer was detected in 76% of the samples. Overall, the concentration of GDF9 was approximately 10-times higher than BMP15. The concentrations of both GDF9 and BMP15 were significantly lower in spent medium from MII oocytes than in media from oocytes that remained at the GV stage. Concentrations of the GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer did not differ between GV and MII oocytes. Furthermore, BMPR2, SMAD3, and SMAD5 were significantly upregulated in cumulus cells from MII oocytes, indicating that both GDF9 and BMP15 signaling were active during oocyte meiotic resumption in vitro.

Conclusion

These data suggest that the driving mechanisms for oocyte nuclear maturation may involve both GDF9 and BMP15 homodimers, while the role of the GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer is questionable.

Introduction

Oocyte growth and maturation in vivo is regulated by endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine control systems that are crucial for acquiring oocyte competence [1,2,3]. The oocyte itself plays a major role in the regulation of follicle development and modulates its microenvironment by secreting growth factors that signal through the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling pathways [4], such as growth and differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) and bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15). Both these growth factors are secreted solely by the oocyte to affect granulosa and cumulus cells, with downstream effects on follicle development, oocyte maturation, and ovulation [1, 4].

Knowledge on the involvement of GDF9 and BMP15 in oocyte maturation derives from studies using animal models and/or recombinant proteins (rGDF9 and rBMP15). Thus, oocyte competence in vitro, but not meiotic maturation, was improved when rGDF9 and/or rBMP15 were added to culture medium in several mammalian species [5,6,7,8]. Both GDF9 and BMP15 are synthesized as precursor proteins with pro- and mature domains that are further processed to form homodimers or heterodimers that bind to specific serine-threonine transmembrane receptors in granulosa and cumulus cells [9]. Mature GDF9 binds to BMP receptor type II (BMPR2), which then recruits the activin receptor-like kinase-5 (ALK5) and activates the SMAD2/3 pathway [10, 11]. Mature BMP15, on the other hand, binds to complexes of BMPR2 and ALK6 activating the SMAD1/5/8 pathway [12].

The molecular weights (Mw) of pro-mature GDF9 and BMP15 in human follicle fluids are suggested to be around 50 kDa and the mature forms around 20 kDa [13], and 60 and 20 kDa in HEK cell lines, respectively [8]. Though the molecular forms of human GDF9 and BMP15 within the oocyte remain unclear. Human GDF9 is secreted in a pro-mature form that must be processed to become bioactive, unlike in mice, in which GDF9 is secreted in an active form [8]. Further, in vitro studies in HEK cell lines have shown that BMP15 is produced in an active form in humans, whereas ovine BMP15 is inactive, and mouse BMP15 is misfolded and not secreted from the cells [14], indicating different regulation of these factors between species.

A study with GDF9 and BMP15 double knockout mice showed a synergistic biological action of GDF9 and BMP15 [15]. However, whether this cooperation results from the interaction between GDF9 and BMP15 homodimers or from a GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer is still a matter of debate. There is a body of evidence pointing towards species-specific differences in the GDF9/BMP15 system in vivo [14, 16, 17]. For instance, GDF9-deficient mice are infertile [18], and BMP15-deficient mice are subfertile [15], whereas in sheep both proteins are required for the animal to be fertile [19, 20]. In humans, dysregulation or naturally occurring mutations within the GDF9/BMP15 system have been linked to several female reproductive diseases, including primary ovarian insufficiency and polycystic ovarian syndrome [3]. However, reports are not consistent [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. These differences between species suggest that effects observed in mutant and knock-out animal models may not reflect mechanisms in humans.

An increased understanding of BMP15/GDF9 signaling during human oocyte maturation may improve the clinical treatment for women with ovulation dysfunction and infertility, especially in connection with in vitro maturation (IVM). Also, levels of GDF9 and BMP15 may serve as biomarkers for oocyte quality. To date, quantitation of these proteins has proven difficult due to several factors: (i) the lack of specific monoclonal antibodies available, needed for assay development; (ii) BMP15 and GDF9 have some atypical structural features (e.g., they form non-covalently homo- and heterodimers); (iii) it is unknown exactly how GDF9 and BMP15 are processed in vivo and which forms are present in human biological fluids. Only a few studies have quantitated GDF9 and BMP15 in human serum and follicle fluids using either in-house developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) or a new commercially available ELISA for GDF9 [29,30,31,32].The present study aimed to characterize human native GDF9 and BMP15 and explore their regulation during IVM using western blot, immunofluorescence, and ELISA analyses in human oocytes and spent media after IVM. Moreover, the expression of genes down-stream of GDF9 and BMP15 signaling was also evaluated in cumulus cells before and after IVM.

Materials and methods

Patients and collected material

A total of 60 patients (mean age 28 years; range 13–39) who underwent unilateral ovariectomy and ovarian tissue cryopreservation were included in the study. The indications for fertility preservation were breast cancer (n = 39), neurological malignancy (n = 5), non-malignant blood disorders (n = 5), lymphoma (n = 4), gastrointestinal malignancy (n = 3), other malignant diseases (n = 3), and other benign disease (n = 1).. All samples used in the present study (oocytes, cumulus cells, and spent media) were collected in association with other research projects. The type of sample used from each patient is shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. Information on the number of oocytes collected per patient and IVM outcomes have been previously published [33, 34].

Ovary transport and oocyte collection

After ovariectomy, ovaries were transported in IVF flushing medium (Origio A/S, Måløv, Denmark) either at 37 °C from the local hospital (10 min transport) or on crushed ice from collaborating hospitals (2–5 h transport). Once the ovarian cortex was isolated for cryopreservation, all dishes containing the surplus medulla tissue in HEPES-buffered HTF medium (Invitrogen, GIBCO™) were examined for the presence of immature oocytes under a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ12, Germany) in a flow hood with heated tabletop at 37 °C. Recovered oocytes were placed in holding medium as previously described [33]. Only oocytes that showed clear signs of degeneration, such as darkened cytoplasm, were excluded from the study. Fresh oocytes for western blot analysis were snap frozen right after collection and stored at -80℃ until analysis.

Tissue processing and immunofluorescence staining

Isolated cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) for immunofluorescence analyses were embedded in 1% alginate solution followed by embedding in 4% agar solution and fixated in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 4 h, washed in graded ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. COCs were cut into 5 µm serial sections and prepared for immunofluorescence staining as described previously with few modifications including no use of antigen retrieval and a blocking step with 5% normal donkey serum (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, cat.no.: ab7475) [35]. Mouse monoclonal GDF9 or BMP15 antibodies (Ansh Labs, LLC, Webster, TX, USA, 1:100) were used together with a HSD17β1 rabbit monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cat. No.: ab51045, 1:100). Universal negative control serum® (BioCare Medical, CA, USA) was used in place of primary antibody as negative control and showed no staining; data not shown.

In vitro maturation of human oocytes and collection of cumulus cells and spent media

Oocyte IVM and cumulus cell collection were performed as described previously with minor modifications [34]. Briefly, COCs were divided into three categories according to cumulus mass size: Large cumulus mass (L-COCs), small cumulus mass (S-COCs) and naked oocytes (NOs) (Fig. 1). COCs with at least 10 layers of cumulus cells were considered L-COCs. The COCs were washed three times in IVM medium which consisted of MediCult IVM system (Origio A/S, Denmark) supplemented with 10 mg/mL human serum albumin (HAS; CSL Behring 20%, Germany), 100 IU/L human rLH (Luveris, Serono, Germany), 75 IU/L human rFSH (Rekovelle, Ferring, Copenhagen, Denmark), and 1 µg/mL human recombinant Midkine (SRP3114, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and then individually transferred to fresh 25-µl drops of IVM medium. All oocytes were incubated under paraffin oil (Origio A/S, Denmark) for 42 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air. After 42 h, COCs were mechanically denuded with a 130–133 μm denudation pipette (Vitrolife, Gothenburg, Sweden). Under an inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss Axiovert 135, Germany; × 20 magnification), oocytes were classified as germinal vesicle (GV), metaphase I (MI), metaphase II (MII), or degenerated (DEG). Oocyte maturation was determined by the presence of the first polar body (MII oocytes). The spent media and/or cumulus cells from non-degenerated L-COCs containing GV and MII oocytes after IVM were individually collected and stored at -80 °C for further analyses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Immature oocytes collected from the surplus medulla tissue during OTC. (A) Naked oocyte (NO). (B) Cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) with small cumulus mass (S-COC). (C) COC with large cumulus mass (L-COC). Scale bars: 100 µm

Full size image

Determination of GDF9, BMP15, and GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer by ELISA

Concentrations of GDF9, BMP15 and GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer were measured using ELISA assays in single drops of spent media (n = 94) from L-COCs containing GV (n = 43) or MII oocytes (n = 51) after IVM. The measurements were performed using GDF9 (AL-176), BMP15 (AL-179), GDF9-BMP15 complex (AL-181) ELISA’s from Ansh Labs, Webster, Texas, USA. All samples were diluted 1:5 prior to assaying GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer and diluted 1:10 prior to measuring BMP15, and GDF9, respectively. Analytical characteristics for GDF9, BMP15 and the GDF9-BMP15 complex assays are described in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis

Cumulus cells (n = 72) from COCs before (Fresh, n = 24) and after IVM (n = 48) were evaluated according to their maturation status: GV (n = 21) or MII (n = 27). Total RNA was individually extracted and purified from cumulus cells of each COC as previously described using the Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit and Taqman® assay [34]. The following TaqMan probes were used: BMP receptor type 2 (BMPR2; #Hs000176148_m1), ALK5 (#Hs00610320_m1), ALK6 (#Hs01010965_m1), SMAD1 (#Hs00195432_m1), SMAD2 (#Hs00183425_m1), SMAD3 (#Hs00969210_m1), SMAD5 (#Hs00195437_m1), and beta-actin (ACTB; #Hs01060665_g1) All samples were run in duplicates and normalized to ACTB [36].

Western blot

Western blot analyses were performed as previously described [37] using the Invitrogen western blot system (Thermo Fischer, Hvidovre, Denmark). Pooled oocytes were lysed in 20 µl radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (R0278, Sigma-Aldrich, Brøndby, Denmark). Proteins separated on a NuPAGE® 4–12% Bis–Tris mine gel was transferred to a membrane blocked in 5% skim milk and incubated with primary antibody (GDF9 or BMP15, Ansh Labs, 1:5000) overnight at 4 °C. Secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit-anti-mouse antibody (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich) was applied for 1 h at room temperature. The Mw of the visualized bands were calculated using the AzureSpot 2.2.170 software.

The specificity of the primary antibodies used for western blotting was tested with blocking peptides against GDF9 (BG016, Ansh Labs) and BMP15 (BB028, Ansh Labs). Human rGDF9 standard (SRP4872, Sigma Aldrich) and human rBMP15 standard (5096-BM-005, R&D systems, Abingdon, UK) were used as a positive control.

Statistical analysis

The association between growth factor concentration in spent media and oocyte maturation was modeled as a mixed logistic regression with the concentrations of GDF9, BMP15, and GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer as outcome and oocyte stage (GV and MII) as explanatory variable. Patient effect was included as a random intercept. The impact of oocyte maturation stage on expression of the target genes (BMPR2, ALK5, ALK6, SMAD1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD5) was modeled as a mixed linear regression with expression of genes as outcome and maturation (MII yes/no) as explanatory variable. Furthermore, a post hoc test (Tukey) was performed to identify differences among the groups. A two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was performed to evaluate if the Mw of pro-mature GDF9 and BMP15 detected with western blot analysis were different. All analysis was done using R version 3.4.3 or GraphPad Prism 9.3.1. All P-values below 0.05 were regarded as significant.

Results

Western blot

In pools of fresh GV oocytes we detected a pro-mature GDF9 band with a mean weight of 47 kDa (range: 43–49 kDa; ± SEM:1.07), and a pro-mature BMP15 band with a mean weight of 43 kDa (range: 40–45 kDa; ± SEM:1.31). Moreover, a weaker BMP15 band of 34 kDa (range: 31–37 kDa; ± SEM:1.47) were detected (one representative blot is included in Fig. 2A). The Mw of GDF9 and BMP15 were calculated as means based on 4 and 5 consecutive western blots, respectively. The Mann–Whitney test identified the pro-mature GDF9 and BMP15 bands as significantly different (P = 0.03). The theoretical Mw of pro-mature GDF9 and BMP15 were 48 kDa and 43 kDa, respectively, based on the sequences obtained with Blast analysis in the Uniprot database (https://www.uniprot.org/) and sequence analysis in Bioinformatics.org/sms/prot.mw.html. The primary antibody incubated over-night with either GDF9 or BMP15 blocking peptides resulted in no detectable bands, illustrating the specificity of the antibodies (Fig. 2A). The lanes presented in Fig. 2A were run on the same gel and bands from the pooled fresh oocytes served as positive controls for the lanes treated with blocking peptides. Western blot analysis was also performed using pooled GV and MI/MII oocytes after IVM and similar bands were detected (Fig. 2B), illustrating that neither IVM conditions nor oocyte meiotic resumption affected GDF9 and BMP15 production (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, the recombinant GDF9 and BMP15 standards had different Mw than the native forms of these proteins (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

GDF9 and BMP15 in human oocytes. (A) GDF9 was detected at a molecular weight of 47 kDa in a pool of 11 human immature oocytes. Using a blocking peptide against GDF9 (BG016, Ansh Labs) the band disappeared. BMP15 was detected at molecular weight of 43 kDa in a pool of 20 human immature oocytes. After including a BMP15 blocking peptide (BB028, Ansh Labs) the band disappeared, validating the specificity of the antibody. (B) GDF9 and BMP15 were detected after IVM in pools of 23 GV oocytes per lane and 28 MI/MII oocytes per lane. Note that the bands from recombinant GDF9 and BMP15 standards differed significantly from the native oocyte derived bands. The uncropped western blot membranes can be found in additional files 3 (A) and 4 (B)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

GDF9 and BMP15 localization in human ovarian follicles. (A) GDF9 (green) and HSD17β1 (red). (A1-A4) cumulus oocyte complex, (A5-A8) Magnifications of the dotted boxes in A1-A4). (B) BMP15 (green) and HSD17β1 (red). (B1-B4) cumulus oocyte complex, (B5-B8) Magnifications of the dotted boxes in B1-B4)

Full size image

Localization of GDF9 and BMP15 in human COCs

Both GDF9 and BMP15 were detected specifically in the oocyte of human COCs obtained from small antral follicles (Figs. 3 – A2 and B2). The granulosa cell specific enzyme HSD17β1 was detected in the surrounding cumulus cells (Figs. 3 – A3 and B3).

Concentrations of GDF9, BMP15, and GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer in spent media after IVM

The concentrations of GDF9, BMP15, and the GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer were individually measured in spent media from 94 oocytes at different maturation stages after IVM: 43 at germinal vesicle (GV) and 51 at metaphase II (MII). GDF9 was detected in 93 samples: GV (n = 43) and MII (n = 50); BMP15 was detected in 60 samples: GV (n = 27) and MII (n = 33); and GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer was detected in 71 samples: GV (n = 31) and MII (n = 40).

Overall, the concentration of both GDF9 and BMP15 was significantly negatively associated with oocyte maturation (P = 0.02 and P = 0.004, respectively), while no significant associations were observed for the GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer (P > 0.05) (Fig. 4). Significant higher GDF9 and BMP15 concentrations were detected in spent media from GV oocytes compared to MII oocytes (P = 0.02 and P = 0.002, respectively) (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the GDF9/BMP15 ratio was constant within each oocyte category; while the GDF9 concentration was around ten times higher than BMP15 in spent media from both GV oocytes (10,144 pg/ml GDF9 and 931 pg/ml BMP15) and MII oocytes (4,126 pg/ml GDF9 and 430 pg/ml BMP15).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mean concentration of GDF9, BMP15, and GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer in spent media after IVM according to oocyte meiotic stage: germinal vesicle (GV; n = 43) or metaphase II (MII; n = 51). Error bars represent SEM. *P = 0.02; **P = 0.002

Full size image

Relative expression of BMPR2, ALK5, ALK6, SMAD1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD5 in cumulus cells

The expression of seven genes from the GDF9 and/or BMP15 signaling pathways was evaluated in cumulus cells from human oocytes before IVM (GV(Fresh), n = 24), and after IVM (GV, n = 21; and MII, n = 27) (Fig. 5). Overall, there was a significant positive association between oocyte maturation and the expression of BMPR2 (P = 0.003), SMAD3 (P = 0.02), and SMAD5 (P = 0.02) in their corresponding cumulus cells (Fig. 5A,E,G). Cumulus cells from MII oocytes expressed higher levels of BMPR2 (P = 0.005) (Fig. 5A), SMAD3 (P = 0.02) (Fig. 5E), and SMAD5 (P = 0.03) (Fig. 5G) than cumulus cells from GV oocytes after IVM. The expression of ALK5 (Fig. 5B), ALK6 (Fig. 5C), SMAD1 (Fig. 5F), and SMAD2 (Fig. 5D) did not change during oocyte meiotic resumption in vitro (P > 0.05). Except for ALK6 (P = 0.003) (Fig. 5C), no differences were found between GV oocytes before IVM and after IVM (P > 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Relative expression of seven genes from the GDF9 and BMP15 signaling pathways in cumulus cells from human oocytes before IVM (GV(Fresh), n = 24), and after IVM (GV, n = 21; and MII, n = 27). GV and MII respectively refer to germinal vesicle and metaphase II stages. (A) BMPR2, (B) ALK5, (C) ALK 6, (D) SMAD2, (E) SMAD3, (F) SMAD1, and (G) SMAD5. Error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05; **P ≤ 0.005

Full size image

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first time that native forms of human GDF9, BMP15, and the GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer have been measured in spent media after IVM and the pro-mature forms in human oocytes before and after IVM; and directly linked to oocyte meiotic maturation. We detected native pro-mature GDF9 and BMP15 in human oocytes with Mw of 47 kDa and 43 kDa, respectively, which were similar to the theoretical Mw of pro-mature GDF9 (48 kDa) and BMP15 (43 kDa). The Mw for GDF9 and BMP15 has now for the first time been detected in human oocytes in four/five independent measurements and show relative low variability. In lanes with rGDF9 and rBMP15, lower Mw bands were detected, illustrating that the antibodies were able to detect epitopes on the dissociated mature forms. Therefore, the absence of low Mw bands in the oocytes suggest that cleavage of the pro-forms does not take place inside the oocyte in humans and that dimerization takes place outside the oocyte. Thereby, these data for the first time confirm the model proposed by Stocker and co-workers [8] in humans. Further, extracellular cleavage has been reported in human follicle fluids obtained in connection with IVF [13] and supernatants from HEK cell lines [8].

Both GDF9 and BMP15 concentrations were significantly lower in spent media from MII oocytes compared to GV oocytes after IVM, whereas the GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer remained constant. However, we cannot determine whether these values of the heterodimer are high or low since we can only measure this in relative concentrations. The synergistic biological action of GDF9 and BMP15 has been widely debated [3, 15]. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether this cooperation results from the interaction between GDF9 and BMP15 homodimers or from a GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer. In vitro, rGDF9/rBMP15 heterodimer has shown a potent activation of the SMAD2/3 pathway in mouse granulosa cells [38]; both SMAD2/3 and SMAD1/5/8 pathways in a human granulosa cell line (COV434) [8]; and better-supporting embryo development after IVM in the mouse and porcine models [7, 8]. Nonetheless, the unchanged concentration of the native GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer between GV and MII oocytes detected in the present study indicates the heterodimer is not regulated or affected during human IVM.

The concentration of GDF9 in spent media was approximately 10-times higher than BMP15, which corroborates recent measurements by our group in follicular fluid from human small antral follicles [39]. This 10-times excess GDF9 in relation to BMP15 indicates that the vast majority of GDF9 are not bound in a heterodimer complex and may have a role on its own during folliculogenesis.

Interestingly, similar GDF9 and BPM15 bands were detected in fresh oocytes, and in GV and MI/MII after IVM, indicating that these growth factors are produced both before and during maturation in vitro. The early oocyte specific expression of GDF9 and BMP15 was also detected in oocytes from COCs obtained from small antral follicles using immunofluorescence analysis, illustrating that GDF9 and BMP15 are expressed already in immature oocytes long before selection occurs.

GDF9 and BMP15 bind to receptors on the surrounding cumulus cells [9]. We hypothesize that the reduced concentrations of GDF9 and BMP15 detected in the spent media from MII oocytes are the results of higher consumption of GDF9 and BMP15 by their corresponding cumulus cells during IVM. Whether this reduction in GDF9 and BMP15 during IVM can be related to oocyte quality has to await fertilization studies. The significantly upregulated expressions of both the common receptor BMPR2 and the downstream genes SMAD3, and SMAD5 in cumulus cells from MII oocytes, indicate increased activity in these two signaling pathways, supporting this hypothesis. Apparently, both the GDF9-SMAD2/3 and the BMP15-SMAD1/5/8 axes are equally essential for maintaining ovarian function in mono-ovulatory species, since sheep homozygous for inactivating mutations in either GDF9 or BMP15 genes are infertile [20]. Another study including IVF patients also described a tendency for serum concentrations of GDF9 and BMP15 to decline after the LH surge [32]. This was, however, not significant due to patient effects and low detection efficiency. On the contrary, a relatively small study reports a positive correlation between GDF9 concentration in follicular fluid and oocyte maturation during IVF in a total of 6 fluid samples [13]. Nevertheless, the in vivo concentrations of GDF9 and BMP15 in follicular fluid from pre-ovulatory follicles are cumulative and do not represent solely the timeframe where the oocytes resumed meiosis. All COCs included in our study were carefully washed three times before IVM to make sure that we measured growth factors exclusively produced during the 42-h IVM period.

The present study has some limitations. Only the canonical GDF9 and BMP15 SMAD pathways were evaluated by gene expression. Evidence from rat granulosa cell cultures has demonstrated that human rGDF9 and rBMP15 may also activate other non-SMAD signaling pathways, such as the nuclear factor-ΚB (NF-ΚB) and the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathways [40]. Measuring the expression of more genes from these non-SMAD pathways would strengthen the study. However, the amount of mRNA that can be extracted from a single COC to perform RT-qPCR is very limited. The timing of when the first polar body was released during IVM was not recorded. Further experiments are needed to evaluate the effect of the duration of MII arrest on the GDF9/BMP15 signaling during IVM.

The clinical relevance of this study would increase if the MII oocytes were fertilized and the embryo development evaluated, but the Danish authorities do not allow IVM in a clinical setting since the procedure is still considered experimental.

Conclusions

For the first time, the in vivo forms of GDF9 and BMP15 in human oocytes have been determined with a Mw of 47 and 43 KDa, respectively. Further, lower GDF9 and BMP15 concentrations were detected in spent media from MII oocytes after IVM compared to GV oocytes, suggesting that these growth factors were used by the surrounding cumulus cells during oocyte meiotic resumption, while the GDF9/BMP15 heterodimer seemed to be of less importance. Moreover, BMPR2, SMAD3, and SMAD5 were significantly upregulated in MII oocytes, indicating that both GDF9 and BMP15 pathways were active during oocyte meiotic resumption. These data suggest that the driving mechanisms for oocyte nuclear maturation may involve both GDF9 and BMP15 homodimers, with a huge surplus of GDF9 as compared to BMP15.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OTC:

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation

IVM:

In vitro maturation

COCs:

Cumulus-oocyte complexes

L-COC:

COC with large cumulus mass

S-COC:

COC with small cumulus mass

NOs:

Naked oocytes

GV:

Germinal vesicle

MI:

Metaphase I

MII:

Metaphase II

DEG:

Degenerated

rLH:

Human recombinant luteinizing hormone

rFSH:

Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone

TGF-β:

Transforming growth factor-beta

GDF9:

Growth and differentiation factor 9

BMP15:

Bone morphogenetic protein 15

BMPR2:

BMP receptor type II

ALK:

Activin receptor-like kinase

ACTB:

Beta-actin

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent

Mw:

Molecular weight

RT-qPCR:

Quantitative real-time PCR

References

  1. Knight PG, Glister C. TGF-beta superfamily members and ovarian follicle development. Reproduction. 2006;132:191–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang Z, Wells D. The human oocyte and cumulus cells relationship: new insights from the cumulus cell transcriptome. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:715–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang HM, Qiao J, Leung PC. Oocyte-somatic cell interactions in the human ovary-novel role of bone morphogenetic proteins and growth differentiation factors. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilchrist RB, Lane M, Thompson JG. Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:159–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sudiman J, Sutton-McDowall ML, Ritter LJ, White MA, Mottershead DG, Thomson JG, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 15 in the pro-mature complex form enhances bovine oocyte developmental competence. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e103563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li JJ, Sugimura S, Mueller TD, White MA, Martin GA, Ritter LJ, et al. Modifications of human growth differentiation factor 9 to improve the generation of embryos from low competence oocytes. Mol Endocrinol. 2015;29:40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mottershead DG, Sugimura S, Al-Musawi SL, Li JJ, Richani D, White MA, et al. Cumulin, an oocyte-secreted heterodimer of the transforming growth factor-beta family, is a potent activator of granulosa cells and improves oocyte quality. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:24007–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stocker WA, Walton KL, Richani D, Chan KL, Beilby KH, Finger BJ, et al. A variant of human growth differentiation factor-9 that improves oocyte developmental competence. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:7981–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanfins A, Rodriges P, Albertini DF. GDF-9 and BMP-15 direct the follicle symphony. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1741–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vitt UA, Mazerbourg S, Klein C, Hsueh AJ. Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type II is a receptor for growth differentiation factor-9. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:473–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazerbourg S, Klein C, Roh J, Kaivo-Oja N, Mottershead DG, Korchynskyi O, et al. Growth differentiation factor-9 signaling is mediated by the type I receptor, activin receptor-like kinase 5. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18:653–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore RK, Otsuka F, Shimasaki S. Molecular basis of bone morphogenetic protein-15 signaling in granulosa cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:304–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gode F, Gulekli B, Dogan E, Korhan P, Dogan S, Bige O, et al. Influence of follicular fluid GDF9 and BMP15 on embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2274–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Musawi SL, Walton KL, Heath D, Simpson CM, Harrison CA. Species differences in the expression and activity of bone morphogenetic protein 15. Endocrinology. 2013;154:888–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan C, Wang P, DeMayo J, DeMayo FJ, Elvin JA, Carino C, et al. Synergistic roles of bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 in ovarian function. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15:854–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore RK, Erickson GF, Shimasaki S. Are BMP-15 and GDF-9 primary determinants of ovulation quota in mammals? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004;15:356–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Crawford JL, McNatty KP. The ratio of growth differentiation factor 9: bone morphogenetic protein 15 mRNA expression is tightly co-regulated and differs between species over a wide range of ovulation rates. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;348:339–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dong J, Albertini DF, Nishimori K, Kumar TR, Lu N, Matzuk MM. Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis. Nature. 1996;383:531–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Galloway SM, McNatty KP, Cambridge LM, Laitinen MP, Juengel JL, Jokiranta TS, et al. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nat Genet. 2000;25:279–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanrahan JP, Gregan SM, Mulsant P, Mullen M, Davis GH, Powell R, et al. Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (Ovis aries). Biol Reprod. 2004;70:900–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Teixeira Filho FL, Baracat EC, Lee TH, Suh CS, Matsui M, Chang RJ, et al. Aberrant expression of growth differentiation factor-9 in oocytes of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1337–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sproul K, Jones MR, Mathur R, Azziz R, Goodarzi MO. Association study of four key folliculogenesis genes in polycystic ovary syndrome. BJOG. 2010;117:756–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei LN, Liang XY, Fang C, Zhang MF. Abnormal expression of growth differentiation factor 9 and bone morphogenetic protein 15 in stimulated oocytes during maturation from women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:464–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei LN, Huang R, Li LL, Fang C, Li Y, Liang XY. Reduced and delayed expression of GDF9 and BMP15 in ovarian tissues from women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1483–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Resende LO, Vireque AA, Santana LF, Moreno DA, de Sá Rosa e Silva AC, Ferriani RA, et al. Single-cell expression analysis of BMP15 and GDF9 in mature oocytes and BMPR2 in cumulus cells of women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:1057–65.

  26. Wang TT, Ke ZH, Song Y, Chen LT, Chen XJ, Feng C, et al. Identification of a mutation in GDF9 as a novel cause of diminished ovarian reserve in young women. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2473–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Simpson CM, Robertson DM, Al-Musawi SL, Heath DA, McNatty KP, Ritter LJ, et al. Aberrant GDF9 expression and activation are associated with common human ovarian disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E615–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Belli M, Shimasaki S. Molecular aspects and clinical relevance of GDF9 and BMP15 in ovarian function. Vitam Horm. 2018;107:317–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kristensen SG, Kumar A, Kalra B, Pors SE, Bøtkjær JA, Mamsen LS, et al. Quantitative differences in TGF-beta family members measured in small antral follicle fluids from women with or without PCO. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:6371–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berberoglu Z, Aktas A, Fidan Y, Yazici AC, Aral Y. Association of plasma GDF-9 or GDF-15 levels with bone parameters in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Bone Miner Metab. 2015;33:101–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Riepsamen AH, Chan K, Lien S, Sweeten P, Donoghoe MW, Walker G, et al. Serum concentrations of oocyte-secreted factors BMP15 and GDF9 during IVF and in women with reproductive pathologies. Endocrinology. 2019;160:2298–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Riepsamen AH, Donoghoe MW, Baerwald A, Pankhurst MW, Lien S, Chong YH, et al. Exploratory analysis of serum concentrations of oocyte biomarkers growth differentiation factor 9 and bone morphogenetic protein 15 in ovulatory women across the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:546–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nikiforov D, Junping C, Cadenas J, Shukla V, Blanshard R, Pors SE, et al. Improving the maturation rate of human oocytes collected ex vivo during the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:891–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cadenas J, Nikiforov D, Pors SE, Zuniga LA, Wakimoto Y, Ghezelayagh Z, et al. A threshold concentration of FSH is needed during IVM of ex vivo collected human oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:1341–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mamsen LS, Zafeiri A, Bøtkjær JA, Hardlei JR, Ernst E, Oxvig C, et al. Expression of the Insulin-like Growth Factor System in First- and Second-Trimester Human Embryonic and Fetal Gonads. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(9):e3157–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cadenas J, Pors SE, Nikiforov D, Zheng M, Subiran C, Bøtkjær JA, et al. Validating Reference Gene Expression Stability in Human Ovarian Follicles, Oocytes, Cumulus Cells, Ovarian Medulla, and Ovarian Cortex Tissue. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mamsen LS, Bøtkjær JA, Kristensen SG, Pors SE, Jeppesen JV, Kumar A, et al. High Variability of Molecular Isoforms of AMH in Follicular Fluid and Granulosa Cells From Human Small Antral Follicles. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 617523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng J, Li Q, Wigglesworth K, Rangarajan A, Kattamuri C, Peterson RT, Eppig JJ, et al. Growth differentiation factor 9: bone morphogenetic protein 15 heterodimers are potent regulators of ovarian functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E776–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kristensen SG, Kumar A, Mamsen LS, Kalra B, Pors SE, Bøtkjær JA, et al. Concentrations of the oocyte-secreted factors GDF9 and BMP15 vary inversely in small antral follicle fluids from polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(8):e3374–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reader KL, Mottershead DG, Martin GA, Gilchrist RB, Heath DA, McNatty KP, et al. Signalling pathways involved in the synergistic effects of human growth differentiation factor 9 and bone morphogenetic protein 15. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28:491–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Marjo Westerdahl, B.Sc. is acknowledged for excellent technical assistance. A special thank goes to the doctors and nurses in the fertility preservation program at the University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Aarhus, and University Hospital of Odense.

Funding

The University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and the Interregional EU collaboration ReproUnion 2.0 supported this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Jesús Cadenas, Susanne Elisabeth Pors, Stine Gry Kristensen, Claus Yding Andersen & Linn Salto Mamsen

  2. Ansh Labs LLC, 445 W. Medical Center Blvd, Webster, TX, 77598, USA

    Ajay Kumar & Bhanu Kalra

Authors
  1. Jesús Cadenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne Elisabeth Pors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajay Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bhanu Kalra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stine Gry Kristensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Claus Yding Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Linn Salto Mamsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JC participated in the conception and design of the study, collected oocytes, cumulus cells, and spent media, did the IVM, performed the RT-qPCR analysis, and wrote the manuscript. SEP was responsible for data analysis and revised the manuscript. AK and BK performed the ELISA’s and revised the manuscript. SGK contributed to the conception and design of the study and revised the manuscript. CYA contributed to the conception and design of the study, interpretation of data, and final revision of the manuscript. LSM did immunofluorescence analysis, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús Cadenas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee for the Capital Region of Denmark (J. no.: H-2–2011-044). The storage and collection of patient data were approved by the Ministry of Health (J. no. 30–1372) and by the Danish authorities to comply with European Union Tissue Directives. All participants, or parents of patients below 18 years of age, gave informed consent in writing to donate the surplus ovarian tissue for research purposes.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Type of sample collected, and method used for each patient

Additional file 2:

Table S2. Analytical characteristics of the ELISAs

Additional file 3.

GDF9 and BMP15 in immature oocytes. Uncropped western blot membranes.

Additional file 4.

GDF9 and BMP15 in GV and MI/MII oocytes after IVM. Uncropped western blot membranes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cadenas, J., Pors, S.E., Kumar, A. et al. Concentrations of oocyte secreted GDF9 and BMP15 decrease with MII transition during human IVM. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 20, 126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01000-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01000-6

Keywords

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

ISSN: 1477-7827

Contact us