Open Access

Metabolites involved in cellular communication among human cumulus-oocyte-complex and sperm during in vitro fertilization

  • María José Gómez-Torres1Email author,
  • Eva María García1, 2,
  • Jaime Guerrero2,
  • Sonia Medina3,
  • María José Izquierdo-Rico4,
  • Ángel Gil-Izquierdo3,
  • Jesús Orduna5,
  • María Savirón5,
  • Leopoldo González-Brusi4,
  • Jorge Ten1, 2,
  • Rafael Bernabeu2 and
  • Manuel Avilés4
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology201513:123

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0118-9

Received: 28 May 2015

Accepted: 22 October 2015

Published: 9 November 2015

Abstract

Background

Fertilization is a key physiological process for the preservation of the species. Consequently, different mechanisms affecting the sperm and the oocyte have been developed to ensure a successful fertilization. Thus, sperm acrosome reaction is necessary for the egg coat penetration and sperm-oolema fusion. Several molecules are able to induce the sperm acrosome reaction; however, this process should be produced coordinately in time and in the space to allow the success of fertilization between gametes.

The goal of this study was to analyze the metabolites secreted by cumulus-oocyte-complex (COC) to find out new components that could contribute to the induction of the human sperm acrosome reaction and other physiological processes at the time of gamete interaction and fertilization.

Methods

For the metabolomic analysis, eighteen aliquots of medium were used in each group, containing: a) only COC before insemination and after 3 h of incubation; b) COC and capacitated spermatozoa after insemination and incubated for 16–20 hours; c) only capacitated sperm after 16–20 h in culture and d) only fertilization medium as control. Six patients undergoing assisted reproduction whose male partners provided normozoospermic samples were included in the study. Seventy-two COC were inseminated.

Results

The metabolites identified were monoacylglycerol (MAG), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and phytosphingosine (PHS). Analysis by PCR and in silico of the gene expression strongly suggests that the cumulus cells contribute to the formation of the PHS and LPC.

Conclusions

LPC and PHS are secreted by cumulus cells during in vitro fertilization and they could be involved in the induction of human acrosome reaction (AR). The identification of new molecules with a paracrine effect on oocytes, cumulus cells and spermatozoa will provide a better understanding of gamete interaction.

Keywords

Cumulus cells Acrosome reaction Lysophosphatidylcholine Phytosphingosine Metabolomics

Background

In the mammalian genital tract, fully mature oocytes that are ready for fertilization are surrounded by a thick vitelline envelope called the zona pellucida (ZP), which, in turn is surrounded by numerous cumulus cells embedded in an acellular matrix. Collectively, these are known as the cumulus-oocyte complex (COC).

The cumulus oophorus is unique to the egg of eutherian mammals [1]. Cumulus cells are involved in oocyte growth and maturation [2]. However, the role of cumulus oophorus during fertilization dependent up on the species [3]. Some studies in mice, have reported that cumulus oophorus plays a key role during in vivo fertilization and failure in its formation affects this process [48] On the other hand, the cumulus oophorus is not equally important during in vitro fertilization as it is during in vivo fertilization. Zhuo et al. (2002) [9] reported that KO mice models that do not form the cumulus matrix (e.g. bikunin) are able to ovulate oocytes, but these oocytes are not fertilized in vivo. However, they can be normally in vitro fertilized [9], although the reason for this is not fully understood. Other studies revealed the role of cumulus cells in the development of human sperm fertilizing ability, during in vitro fertilization in human [10, 11], cattle [12, 13] and pigs [14, 15].

In relation to dialogue between oocyte and spermatozoa, it is known that in human cumulus cells affect various sperm functions [1620]. Previous studies have used the cumulus oophorus for sperm selection in human [17, 21]. Several reports have indicated that progesterone is secreted by the cumulus cells and is able to induce the sperm acrosome reaction (AR) [2225]. The AR is a process that starts at the cell apex, after which the acrosomal content is released very slowly [26]. The AR is required for the sperm to fuse to the oolema [10]. Other authors have previously indicated that ZP glycoproteins are able to induce the AR in different animal and human models [27, 28]. However, the site where spermatozoa begin their RA is subject to controversy [29]. In hamster, Yanagimachi and Phillips (1984) [30] observed that most spermatozoa in vivo initiate their AR while progressing though the cumulus. Other authors maintained that the site where AR begins is the ZP [3133]. Using in vitro fertilization and transgenic mouse spermatozoa, which enable the onset of the AR to be detected using fluorescence microscopy, Jin et al. (2010) [34] found that the spermatozoa that began the AR before reaching the ZP were able to penetrate the ZP and fused with the oocyte´s plasma membrane. Their study suggests a major role for cumulus cells and their matrix during fertilization. Other previous reports reached similar conclusions [35, 36]. However, the precise mechanism responsible for this process remains to be clarified.

The action of cumulus cells on sperm function may be mediated via the secretory products of the cells [3740]. Although a number of studies have reported that cumulus cells provide soluble factors affecting sperm functions, little is known about the role of the cumulus as a promoting element in fertilization. Only a few candidates have been identified in the conditioned medium as cumulus-derived factors. Prostaglandins, PGE1, PGE2, and PGE2ALFA were detected in the incubation medium of COC [41, 42]. Progesterone was identified as another candidate, which induced hyperactivated flagellar movement and the AR as well [22, 43]. Other studies have demonstrated that in human [44, 45], mouse [46]; pig [47] and rabbit [48] the cumulus cells synthesize and secrete progesterone.

However, molecules other than progesterone may be a factor responsible for these effects. For example, a component that induce the AR is the lysophosphatydic acid (LPA) derivated from lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) [22,4952]. The presence of LPA has been described in different biological fluid including the seminal plasma [53, 54] and the follicular fluid [55, 56]. It is well known that the follicular fluid can induce the sperm AR [5759]. However, its function has been related with the presence of progesterone. After ovulation, some follicular fluid components can be detected in the oviductal fluid leading to speculation concerning a potential role for LPA at the time of fertilization [55].

LPC is another component that shows an ability to induce the AR in human [49] and bovine [50] sperm, with an even higher efficiency than progesterone. Then, it seems that nature have developed several mechanisms by using several molecules to ensure that the important physiological process, AR, take place in the proximity in time and place to allow the success of fertilization between gametes.

The goal of this study was the analysis of the metabolites secreted by COC to identify new cumulus-derived factors that may contribute to the induction of human sperm AR and other physiological processes at the time of gamete interaction and fertilization. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the process of fertilization may lead to the development of new pharmacological strategies to treat infertility and for the improvement of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) or for a new and more physiological birth control approach.

Methods

Patients

This study, approved by the Instituto Bernabeu Institutional Review Board, included six patients enrolled at the Instituto Bernabeu (Alicante, Spain) for assisted reproduction with egg donation, whose male partners showed normozoospermic semen samples according to World Health Organization criteria [60], and where conventional IVF was indicated. Written informed consent was obtained for each patient. In all the cases, the percentages of fertilization were over 25 % (Table 1), which assessment the fertilization capacity sperm in all the samples.
Table 1

Percentages of fertilization per case (COC: cumulus-oocyte-complex)

CASE

Number COC

% Fertilization

1

11

81.8

2

12

75

3

12

66.6

4

12

25

5

11

63.6

6

14

35.7

Donor ovarian stimulation and oocyte collection

Controlled ovarian stimulation in six donors was carried out following an induction protocol consisting in the administration of urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone (Fostipur, Angelini Farmaceutica; Barcelona, Spain), combined with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrotide, Merck-Serono; Madrid, Spain) for down-regulation. The ovarian response was mainly monitored with periodical transvaginal ultrasounds. When at least three follicles with a diameter equal to or greater than 17 mm, 0.4 mg of subcutaneous gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (Decapeptyl, Ipsen Pharma; Barcelona, Spain) was administered as ovulation inducer. Thirty-six hours after GnRH agonist administration, COC (oocyte complexes cumulus-corona-oocyte) were retrieved by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration, and isolated in a pre-warmed buffered medium (G-MOPS, Vitrolife; Goteborg, Sweden). COCs were distributed in four-well dishes (no more than 3–4 oocytes per well) containing 650 μl of Fertilization Medium (CookMedical, Ireland) and incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 6 % CO2.

Preparation of semen sample

Semen samples were collected by masturbation after an abstinence period of 3–5 days and just after egg retrieval by donor ovarian pick-up. After liquefaction, the parameters analyzed included: volume, concentration and motility. The methodology and criteria for assessing semen quality were those established by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2010). Sperm selection was performed in 40 % and 80 % discontinuous density gradients using PURESPERM (Nidacon International AB, Sweden). After 20' centrifugation at 300 x g, the pellet was recovered, washed with 3 ml of Gamete Buffer (CookMedical, Ireland) and centrifuged again for 10 'at 500 x g. Finally, the supernatant was removed and Fertilization Medium (CookMedical, Ireland) was added, adjusting the volume according to on the pellet recovered. The samples were incubated at 37 °C and 6 % CO2 until insemination [61].

Insemination

The semen sample was first adjusted to concentration of 3x106 spermatozoa per milliliter. Three hours after ovarian pick-up each well containing oocytes was inseminated with approximately 150,000 spermatozoa per well, covered with 300 μl of paraffin oil and incubated at 37 °C and 6 % CO2 in Fertilization Medium (FM) for 16–20 h. Simultaneously, only spermatozoa were incubated in the same conditions. After incubation the viability sperm was determinated using eosin-nigrosin staining technique. The mean of percentage of viability sperm was 60 % in all the samples analyzed.

Experimental design

Six different cases of conventional IVF were used in this study. A total of seventy-two COC were inseminated. In all the cases the culture medium was FM. Four groups of media were used for metabolomics analysis and five groups of spermatozoa for determination of the AR. These groups were established as follows:
  1. 1.

    Eighteen aliquots (150 μl per aliquot) of medium from the wells containing only COC were collected just before insemination (immediately after 3 h of incubation), taking care to do not aspirate oocytes (MBI: medium before insemination).

     
  2. 2.

    Sperm obtained after density gradient centrifugation and 3 h incubation in FM at 37 °C and 6 % CO2 was used to assess AR (CS: control spermatozoa) for determination AR.

     
  3. 3.

    After assessing fertilization 16–20 h post-insemination, avoiding as far as possible aspirating dispersed cumulus cells, a total of eighteen aliquots (150 μl) of medium were obtained by centrifugation at 600g for 10 min, and the supernatant was used for metabolomic analysis (MAI: medium after insemination). The pellets were used to analyze the percentage of acrosome reacted sperm (SAI: spermatozoa after insemination).

     
  4. 4.

    After 16–20 h incubation, the medium (150–200 μl) from the wells containing only spermatozoa was collected. After centrifugation at 600g for 10 min the supernatant was used for metabolomic analysis (MOS: medium only spermatozoa), and the pellets were used to analyze the percentage of acrosome reacted sperm (SWI: spermatozoa without insemination).

     
  5. 5.

    The FM incubated for 16–20 h at 37 °C and 6 % CO2 was also collected (FM: control group for metabolomic analysis).

     

Two additional groups for AR estimation were included to evaluate the effect of the cumulus cells alone or the conditioned medium where cumulus cells were present.

Incubation of sperm with the cumulus cells in FM

Three hours after ovarian pick-up, 3 to 4 COC from 3 different donors were denudated by enzymatic digestion in hyaluronidase (80 IU/ml) followed by mechanical denudation by gentle pipetting in G-MOPS (Vitrolife). Media containing cumulus cells from each donor was transferred to conical tubes and then centrifugated at 300 g for 5 min. Pellets with cumulus cells were incubated in 500 μl FM (Cook) at 37 °C and 6 % CO2 in four-well dishes and inseminated with approximately 150,000 spermatozoa per well. One well containing only 500 μl of FM at 37 °C and 6 % CO2 was inseminated in the same conditions, as control. After 17–20 h, media containing spermatozoa from each well was transferred to conical tubes and then centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min.

Incubation of sperm in supernatant of cumulus cells

Cumulus cells from 3 to 4 COC from one donor were recovered as described above. Pellet with cumulus cells were incubated in 500 μl FM (Cook) 37 °C and 6 % CO2 in a four-well dish for 17–20h. The supernatant obtained after centrifugation at 600 g for 10 min was inseminated with approximately 150,000 spermatozoa per well and incubated 37 °C and 6 % CO2. After 17–20h, media containing spermatozoa was transferred to conical tubes and then centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min. Pellet containing the sperm was used to evaluate the percentage of acrosome reacted sperm as previously described.

Determination of the Acrosome Reaction (AR)

Percentage of acrosome reacted sperm was evaluated in the resuspended pellet obtained for the different experimental condition. Spermatozoa were fixed in 100 % methanol for 30 min at room temperature. Sperm aliquots (15 μl) were smeared onto glass slides and air-dried. The percentage of acrosome-reacted sperm was estimated according to the fluorescence pattern of their acrosomes using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Pisum sativum agglutinin (FITC-PSA), as previously reported [62, 63]. The fluorescence patterns of 200 spermatozoa in randomly selected fields of each slide were determined using a Leica TCS SP2 (Leica Microsystems GmBH, Wetzlar, Germany) laser confocal microscope with x1,000 magnification. The acrosomal status of spermatozoa was classified according to the lectin staining as follows: (1) intact acrosome: complete staining of acrosome; (2) acrosome reacted: complete staining of equatorial segment only or no staining of the sperm head. The proportions of the two patterns were expressed as percentages of the total number of spermatozoa counted. The values of acrosome reaction in the three groups established (CS, SAI and SWI) passed the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test (K-S test, P > 0.05). Sources of significant variation were then assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons using Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test (Tukey´s HSD). Descriptive (mean ± SE) and statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v. 15.0 at P < 0.05 significance level.

Metabolomic analysis

Commercial standards and reagents

The theobromine used as quality control compound for the metabolomic analysis was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany) and MS grade solvents such as water, acetonitrile, methanol and formic acid were purchased from Baker (Deventer, Netherlands).

Sample collection

Samples were analyzed taking into account the experimental design (double-blind and randomized).

Sample preparation

On the four groups established (MBI, MAI, MOS and FM), 2 mL of medium were prepared for protein precipitation with 3 mL of cold methanol (kept overnight at −20 °C) and vortexed to mix them. The samples were sonicated for 10 min in a 5510 Branson ultrasonic water bath (Bransonic, Danbury, USA). The samples were vortexed and then sonicated for a further 10 min. The proteins were pelleted by centrifugation at 4500 rpm (Sigma 1–13, B. Braun Biotech International, Osterode, Germany) for 10 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the supernatant was transferred to a vial and evaporated to dryness in a SpeedVac Concentrator Savant SPD 121 P (Thermo Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). The samples were reconstituted in 200 μL (v/v) of water: methanol (50:50) and each sample was vortexed, filtered and transferred to a glass vial for HPLC-q-TOF analysis.

HPLC-q-TOF analysis

Chromatography separation was performed on an 1100 series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbron, Germany) equipped with on-line degasser, auto-sampler, quaternary pump, and thermostatic column compartment. An ACE 3 C18: 150 x 0.075 mm, 3 μm column (United Kingdom) were used. The mobile phase consisted of (A) H2O 0.1% HCOOH and (B) acetonitrile 0.1 % HCOOH. The injection volume was 6.25 nL and the flow rate was 312 nL/min for the culture media samples and quality controls (QCs). A gradient with the following proportions (v/v) of phase B (t, % B) was used for the determination of metabolites (0, 0); (0, 1); (10, 10); (11, 10); (17.5, 100); (19.5, 100); (19.6, 0); (23, 0). The HPLC was coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MS-q-TOF) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).

MS acquisition was performed by a Bruker MicroTOF-Q spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Electrospray (ESI) analyses were carried out in positive and negative ion mode, with capillary and end plate offset voltages of −4500 and −500 V in positive mode, and 4000 and −500 V in negative mode. Nitrogen was used both as nebulizer and drying gas. The nebulizer gas pressure was 1.6 Bar, the drying gas temperature 200 °C and its flow rate 8.0 L/min. Spectra were acquired in the m/z 50–1200 range. In order to calibrate the mass axis, a 10 mM sodium formate solution in 1:1 isopropanol-water was introduced into the ESI source at the beginning of each HPLC run using a divert valve.

Two classes of quality control were used for the metabolomic analysis. QCs consisted to MS grade water samples and theobromine solution (20 μM) injected at three different times in the batch: beginning, middle and end. The samples were randomly ordered for injection.

Bruker Daltonics software packages micrOTOF Control v.2.3, HyStar v.3.2 and Data Analysis v.4.0 were used to control the MS(QTOF) apparatus, interface the HPLC with the MS system and process data, respectively.

Data processing

LC-MS data were analyzed by Profile Analysis software 2.0 (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany), which provides all the tools required for data statistical analysis. Raw data from LC-MS were transformed into a tabular format for their better management. Each data point is described by its retention time (RT) and m/z value called buckets with the corresponding intensities. Advance bucketing was performed in each analysis using the Find Molecular Feature (FMF) algorithm and the results were written into the data matrix, to reduce the enormous size of the LC-MS data.

In our analysis, the retention time and mass range were (0.02; 23.04 min) and (50; 900 Da), respectively. The bucket intensity values were normalized according to largest bucket value in all the samples and were used 50 % as buckets filter. This normalization step is important to ensure the comparative parameters among the different samples. The parameters controlled by FMF compound detection were S/N (signal to noise) threshold, 5; minimum compound length, 10; and smoothing width, 1. As regards general MS parameters, the spectrum type was linear and the spectrum polarity was obtained in the negative and positive modes in order to obtain the maximum number of data for cultures metabolome.

Multivariate statistical analysis

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed using Profile Analysis after Pareto Scaling. PCA-based methods usually constitute the first step in evaluating metabolomic data. PCA is a tool used to reduce the dimensionality of a data set and allows the identification of the most influential variables. The new axes are called principal components (PCs). PC1 describes the largest variance in the data set. The variance explained is calculated as a sum of the individual variance values. In this context, PCA converts data obtained from LC-MS analysis into a visual representation: score plot (samples) and loading plot (buckets values) (Fig. 1). All samples were subjected to Student´s t-test, where a P-value < 0.05 was considered as significant.
Fig. 1

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) results. Score plot PC 1 vs PC 2 and (Data from cell samples (Δ) and control samples (O)) (a) (PC: principal component) and loading plot of PC 1 vs PC2 (b). Lower half of the loading plot shows some buckets discriminative (m/z: mass/charge and RT: retention time) in culture media samples. (ID: identity; FM: fertilization medium; MBI: medium before insemination; MAI: medium after insemination and MOS: medium only spermatozoa)

Metabolite identification

Metabolites were identified on the basis of their exact mass, which was compared with those registered in various freely available databases like the Human Metabolome Database (www.hmdb.ca) and ChemSpider Database (www.chemspider.com).

Marker identification is possible thanks to a powerful analysis tool in the Profile Analysis software called SmartFormula, which provides information on the whole theoretical elemental composition for a particular m/z value. SmartFormula provided the empiric formula for the exact mass and the information on the isotopic pattern using a sigma algorithm (a combined value for standard deviation of the masses and intensities for all peaks). A mass tolerance value ≤ 5 mDa was used as complementary information to identify significant markers.

Gene expression analysis

RT-PCR analysis in human cumulus oophorus

A gene expression analysis of human N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase (acid ceramidase) 1 (ASAH1), human sphingolipid C4-hydroxylase (hDES2) and alkaline ceramidase 3 (ACER3) by RT-PCR in cumulus cells is performed to identify the potential contribution of the cumulus cells to the synthesis of the different metabolites. Cumulus cells from 13 COC were obtained from three additional patients. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Quiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA with the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System kit for RT-PCR (Invitrogen-Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

ASAH1, hDES2 and ACER3 were partially amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by means of specific primers. Two pairs of oligonucleotides were designed based on sequences deposited in GenBank (NG_177924, AY541700 and NM_018367, see Table 2). Amplifications were performed using 2 μL of target cDNA, 0.5 μg of each primer, 200 μM of each dNTP and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase. PCRs were carried out using an initial denaturation cycle of 2 min, and then 30 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min. The final extension time was 10 min at 72 °C. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2 % agarose gels. Four microliters of the PCR reaction mixture were mixed with loading buffer and separated for 90 min at 100 V, before being visualized under UV light using ethidium bromide. Amplicons were carefully excised from the agarose gels and purified with a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit Protocol (Quiagen), following the manufacter’s protocol. After that, the amplicons were automatically sequenced.
Table 2

Primers used in the amplification of ASAH1, hDES2 and ACER3

Gen (GenBank accession number)

Forward

Reverse

Amplified Region (bp)

ASAH1 (NM_177924)

catgtgaccgaacactgca

gttcaccatggttcgactg

250

hDES2 (AY541700)

gctggttcttctgcacac

ccttgaggaacatgtagtg

267

ACER3 (NM_018367)

gcttcttatttagcactcac

gcagatggtagtttactgag

172

In silico analysis of the gene expression in cumulus cells and oocytes

Due to the complexity to obtain sufficient healthy metaphase II oocytes and to analyze by RT-PCR the PLA2 gene family an in silico analysis was performed. Thus, a detailed analysis of human RNA seq experiments stored in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE46490 [64], GSE36552 [65] and GSE44183 [66].

Results

Metabolomic analysis

The four groups of media (FM, MBI, MAI and MOS) were analyzed by LC-MS analysis for mass data collection. After peak alignment, a bucket table with approximately 1200 mass features was obtained. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to produce interpretable directions of the samples in a reduced dimensionality and to reveal the buckets that influence group separation. PCA plots were used to determine metabolomic differentiation in the samples. A clear separation among the different culture medium samples can be observed (Fig. 1 (a)). Two first principal components (PCs) extracted accounted for 67.7 % of total variance of the LC-MS dataset (Fig. 1 (a)).

In this analysis eleven buckets were selected as the most significant, with P < 0.05 according to the m/z and retention time (Table 3). Three of them were identified in the positive mode as phytosphingosine (PHS), monoacylglyceride (MAG) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), with a tolerance mass value of ≤ 5 mDa as additional parameter for the identification of the metabolites. PHS and MAG were detected in MAI and MOS groups. LPC was found in MBI, MAI and MOS groups; however, in the control group (FM), these metabolites were not detected. Fig. 1 (b) also depicts loading plot where significant buckets are far from the center (m/z 317.2985; 12.67min and m/z 352.2660; 0.46 min) and could be responsible for the variance within the data set. These metabolites were identified as monoacylglyceride, phospholipid and lysophospholipid classes.
Table 3

Identification of putative metabolites in culture medium samples. The metabolites are indicated according to the hierarchical order provided by a t-test at P < 0.05

 

Buckets

  

Intensities

ID

m/z

RT

Elemental Formula

Metabolite

FM

MBI

MAI

MOS

1

287.2845

13.48

C14H39O5

Unidentified

0

7197

5543

2802

2

293.9369

0.54

-

Unidentified

0

2812

2913

3076

3

300.1410

12.04

C14H16N6O2

Unidentified

0

2395

0

0

4

317.2985

12.67

C18H39NO3

Phytosphingosine

0

0

6224

4105

5

321.1973

2.67

C13H27N3O6

Unidentified

0

1766

2354

2263

6

352.2660

0.46

C21H36O4

Monoacylglyceride

0

0

514

448

7

408.1612

13.15

C19H24N2O8

Unidentified

0

20190

5593

6674

8

424.1354

13.17

C23H16N6O3

Unidentified

0

7432

0

2331

9

519.3386

12.33

C26H50NO7P

Lysophosphatidylcholine (18:2)

0

6211

4655

3166

10

735.8622

0.47

-

Unidentified

0

823

636

752

11

830.4411

9.79

-

Unidentified

0

2148

6736

11896

Acrosome reaction

As described above LPC is able to induce the AR (de Lamirande et al., 1998) in human and bovine sperm. For that reason, the percentage of acrosome-reacted sperm was evaluated in the different experimental groups (Fig. 2). Significant spermatozoa variation was observed (F = 17.02; df = 2, 15; P < 0.001; ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons (Tukey´s HSD; P < 0.05) showed that the mean percentage value of acrosome-reacted sperm in the SAI experimental group (67.41 ± 13.572) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than the values of both the SWI experimental group (20.67 ± 0.704) and CS experimental group (control group) (4.89 ± 1.249). In contrast, no statistical differences (P = 0.358) were found in the mean percentage of acrosome-reacted sperm when SWI and CS were compared.
Fig. 2

Differences in the percentage of acrosome-reacted spermatozoa between SAI, SWI and CS. Error bars indicate SE of the mean (% values). Asterisk denotes P < 0.05 (α-values maintained by sequential Tukey's HSD corrections). NS, not significant differences. SAI: spermatozoa after insemination; SWI: spermatozoa without insemination; CS: control spermatozoa

The mean of percentage of acrosome reacted sperm after incubation of sperm with the cumulus cells in FM (39.3 ± 8.5 vs 18.5 ± 0.5) and supernatant of the cumulus cells (49.3 ± 1.5 vs 18.6 ± 1.5) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the control experiment.

Gene expression analysis

Gene expression analysis of ASAH1, hDES2 and ACER3 by RT-PCR in human cumulus cells

In order to know the source of the metabolites identified previously, the gene expression of different enzymes involved in their biosynthetic pathway was analyzed by RT-PCR analysis. cDNAs corresponding to ASAH1, hDES2 and ACER3 were partially amplified from the total RNA prepared from human cumulus cells (Fig. 3). Three amplicons of 250 bp, 267 bp and 172 bp were obtained corresponding to ASAH1, hDES2 and ACER3 respectively. These genes codify for three enzymes related with the sphingolipid synthetic pathways [67]. ASAH1 is a gene that encodes acid ceramidase. The protein catalyzes the synthesis and degradation of ceramide into sphingosine and fatty acid [68]. Furthermore, hDES2 exhibits a hydroxylase activity for dihydroceramide and reveals a high production of phytosphingolipids in different tissues [69]. ACER3 is an enzyme that hydrolyzes phytoceramide into PHS and free fatty acid [67, 70]. ACER3 and hDES2 gene expression in cumulus cells strongly suggests that these cells contribute to the formation of the PHS detected by metabolomic methods.
Fig. 3

Amplicons corresponding to ASAH1, hDES2 and ACER3. 3.1 a) amplicon of 250 bp of ASAH1. b) amplicon of 267 bp of hDES2. 3.2 Amplicon corresponding to ACER3 (172 bp)

In silico gene expression analysis in human oocytes and cumulus cells

The in silico analysis of the gene expression that participate in the PHS synthesis was also performed in the human oocytes. Thus, a lower gene expression was observed with the ACER3 gene compared to the ASAH1 and hDES2 (Additional file 1: Table S1).

The in silico analysis of the gene expression allow to identify the expression of different gene of the PLA2 subfamily in cumulus cells (Additional file 2: Table S2). These genes are responsible of the synthesis of the LPC. The most expressed gene is the PLA2G16. In the human oocyte, two different studies indicate that the PLA2 gene expression is almost absent except for the PLA2G4C with a moderate expression however PLA2G12B is low (Additional file 1: Table S1) [65, 66].

Discussion

Whether it occurs following the sperm binding to the ZP or during the sperm transit through the cumulus matrix, AR is a necessary event for the in vivo fertilization of the egg [10, 71]. Many different molecules present in the female genital tract, including steroids, phospholipids, small peptides and growth factors have been shown to induce AR [22, 72].

Lysophosphatidylcholine

One of the metabolite found in our study was LPC. Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) metabolizes membrane lipids to arachidonic acid (AA) and LPC. Several works have described that LPC is able to induce the AR in different species, including human [49, 7375]. The acrosome-reacted sperm produced by the LPC are fertile [73]. In 1986, Byrd and Wolf (1986) [75] indicated that the action of the LPC is very fast (15 min), leading to the rapid loss of motility (less than 2 min). Later, de Lamirande et al. (1998) [49] observed that 2.5 micromolar or below is not toxic, neither motility nor viability being affected. Therefore, the amount of LPC present in the oviductal fluid should be regulated precisely to avoid the above mentioned toxicity. No studies are available on the amount of LPC present in the oviductal fluid, although its presence in the follicular fluid and plasma serum has been reported. Thus, it was reported that the concentration of LPC is 286 mM and 252 mM in human follicular fluid and plasma, respectively [76].

A recent study [52] demonstrated that LPC is a better AR inducer than progesterone in bovine spermatozoa. In our study, LPC was first detected in the in vitro fertilization medium. LPC was detected with higher intensity in MBI and MAI (both medium contained COC), than in MOS (relative and semi-quantitative data). These results strongly suggest that cumulus cells contribute to LPC secretion. The LPC detected in MOS (medium with only spermatozoa) could be produced by these cells, which is consistent with the reports of other authors [77] concerning an increase of sperm LPC when the plasma membrane of the sperm is affected during acrosome reaction.

Moreover, LPC is able to induce the sperm AR, which is consistent with the higher percentages of acrosome-reacted human sperm observed after insemination (SAI group) when were incubated without COC (SWI group) (Fig. 2). The similar results obtained with isolated cumulus cells and conditionated medium obtained after the culture with cumulus cells support the previous finding. The smallest differences observed among the intact COC and the isolated cumulus cells and conditionated medium could be due to the abscence of different extracellular component present in the cumulus matrix (i.e. hyaluronic acid) or the differential gene expression due to the lost of gap junction among cumulus cells and/or oocytes. Further investigations will be required to study the kinetics of the AR induced by LPC and to compare the findings with those of a previous study [26], which used other AR inducers.

On the other hand, previous reports described how the stimulation of acrosomal exocytosis by some inductors leads to activation of PLA2 and the subsequent production of AA and lysophospholipids [7880]. In addition, a recent study demonstrated that the PLA2 Group IID is present at the head and midpiece of human sperm where it plays a functional role during acrosomal exocytosis [81]. The PLA2 gene expression demonstrated by an in silico analysis of the cumulus cells (Additional file 2: Table S2) strongly supports that LPC is produced by the cumulus cells. Moreover, LPC at the time of fertilization could be involved in other important steps of fertilization in human as sperm-ZP binding and sperm-oocyte fusion as reported previously in rodents [82, 83]. Future experiments are necessary to test this hypothesis.

Phytosinphosine

Sphingolipids have emerged as essential secondary messengers in a variety of signal transduction pathways. Among these lipids, the ceramide is an important inducer of programmed cell death, i.e., apoptosis [8486]. Previous studies demonstrated that the intestines, kidney and skin contained a considerable amount of phytosphingosine (PHS) [8789]. On the other hand, Saisuga et al. (2012) [90], detected PHS in different tissues among them the testis, by a liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method. PHS was detected in the MAI medium, when the COC and spermatozoa were incubated for 17 h. Additional experimental evidences support the presence of PHS in our study [91]. Thus, two different enzymes involved in the biosynthetic pathway of the PHS have been detected. DES2 was detected previously in other tissues in both mice [92] and human [69]. This enzyme is responsible for the synthesis of PHcer using DHcer as substrate. DHcer is the substrate of the ACER3 enzyme that produces PHS. The detection of the mRNA codifying for ACER3 in cumulus cells suggests that these cells are involved in the formation of PHS. Moreover, the in silico analysis showed that the ACER is expressed at high level in the cumulus cells [64] which is coincident with our data. However; the ACER3 gene expression in the human oocyte is very low suggesting a major role played by the cumulus cells compared to the oocyte [65, 66]. However, in the medium with only COC (MBI), in which the oocytes were incubated only for three hours PHS was not detected. This result could be explained by the short culture time used with this sample, and future experiments are necessary to confirm this hypothesis and to demonstrate a role of PHS as acrosome reaction inducer.

Monoacylglycerol

AR occurs during fertilization; O’Toole et al. (1996) [93] reported that human spermatozoa, stimulated with either progesterone or the Ca2+ ionophore A23187, undergo acrosomal exocytosis. This process entails the activation of phosphoinositidase C (PIC), and leads to hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to generate inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), which stimulates the release of stored Ca2+, and diacylglycerol (DAG), which generally activates protein Kinase C [94].

In our case, only the monoacylglyceride was detected in the ESI. This was probably due to the spontaneous fragmentation of the pseudomolecular ion of diacylgliceride leading to the loss of an acyl moiety as a result of its weak bond like it is usually in the analysis of steryl fatty acyl esters by mass spectrometry [95]. This metabolite was found both in MAI and in MOS media containing acrosome-reacted sperm. No monoacylglyceryde was found in MBI this could be due to no sperm are present but also to short incubation time in this medium.

Conclusions

According to the metabolites found in this study, LPC and PHS are secreted by cumulus cells during culture (17 hrs). Both components could induce the AR in spermatozoa, contributing to the release into the medium of additional LPC, MAG and PHS by the acrosome-reacted sperm (Fig. 4). So, the identification of molecules with a paracrine effect in oocytes, cumulus cells and spermatozoa secreted during maturation and fertilization could help to improve the efficiency of ARTs thanks to a better understanding of the molecular dialogue between these specialized cells.
Fig. 4

Working model for interplay of LPC/PHS/MAG metabolites during in vitro fertilization. Schematic diagrams showing: (a) Oocyte and cumulus cells culture during three hours (t3) and LPC secreted into MBI by cumulus cells. (b) Oocyte, cumulus cells and spermatozoa cultured during seventeen hours (t17) and LPC and PHS secreted by cumulus cells into MAI and inducing the acrosome reaction in spermatozoa. Acrosome reacted sperm (arrow) release LPC, PHS and MAG in the culture medium. (c) Only spermatozoa cultured for seventeen hours (t17). Spontaneous acrosome-reacted sperm are observed (arrows) which are probably responsible for the release of LPC, PHS and MAG into MOS

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grant GV/2009/097 from Department of Education, Generalitat Valenciana, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain (Vigrob-137), the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad AGL2012-40180-C03-02 and Fundación Seneca (04542/GERM/06).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biotechnology, University of Alicante
(2)
Instituto Bernabeu of Fertility and Gynecology
(3)
Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Food Science and Technology Department, CEBAS-CSIC
(4)
Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, Espinardo 30100 and IMIB
(5)
Institute of Materials Science of Aragon, CSIC-University of Zaragoza

References

  1. Bedford J, Kim H. Cumulus oophorus as a sperm sequestering device in vivo. J Exp Zool. 1993;265:321–8.Google Scholar
  2. Tanghe S, Van Soom A, Nauwynck H, Coryn M, de Kruif A. Functions of the cumulus oophorus during oocyte maturation, ovulation and fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;61:414–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedford JM. What marsupial gametes disclose about gamete function in eutherian mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1996;8:569–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hizaki H, Segi E, Sugimoto Y, Hirose M, Saji, Ushikubi F, et al. Abortive expansion of the cumulus and impaired fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP(2). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10501–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fülöp C, Szántó S, Mukhopadhyay D, Bardos T, Kamath RV, Rugg MS, et al. Impaired cumulus mucification and female sterility in tumor necrosis factor-induced protein-6 deficient mice. Development. 2003;130:2253–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Salustri A, Garlanda C, Hirsch E, De Acetis M, Maccagno A, Bottazzi B, et al. PTX3 plays a key role in the organization of the cumulus oophorus extracellular matrix and in vivo fertilization. Development. 2004;131:1577–86.Google Scholar
  7. Shimada M, Yanai Y, Okazaki T, Noma N, Kawashima I, Mori T, et al. Hyaluronan fragments generated by sperm-secreted hyaluronidase stimulate cytokine/chemikine production via the TLR2 and TLR4 pathways in cumulus cells of ovulated COCs, with may enhance fertilization. Development. 2008;135:2001–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tanii I, Aradate T, Matsuda K, Komiya A, Fuse H. PACAP-mediated sperm-cumulus cell interaction promotes fertilization. Reproduction. 2011;2:163–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhuo L, Yoneda M, Zhao M, Yingsung W, Yoshida N, Kitagawa Y, et al. Defect in SHAP-hyaluronan complex causes severe female infertility. A study by inactivation of the bikunin gene in mice. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:7693–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yanagimachi R. Mammalian fertilization. In: Knobil E, Neil JD, editors. The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994. p. 189–317.Google Scholar
  11. Tesarik J, Pilka L, Drahorád J, Cechová D, Veselský L. The role of cumulus cell secreted proteins in the development of human sperm fertilizing ability: implication in IVF. Human Reprod. 1988;3:129–32.Google Scholar
  12. Zhang L, Jiang S, Wozniak PJ, Yang X, Godke RA. Cumulus cell function during bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo development in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 1995;40:338–44.Google Scholar
  13. Tajik P, Niwa K, Murase T. Effects of different protein supplements in fertilization medium on in vitro penetration of cumulus-intact and cumulus-free bovine oocytes matured in culture. Theriogenology. 1993;40:949–58.Google Scholar
  14. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Fraser RL, Niwa K. Functional analysis using chlortetracyclin fluorescence and in vitro fertilization of frozen-thawed ejaculated boar sper- matozoa incubated in a protein free chemically defined medium. J Reprod Fertil. 1995;104:305–13.Google Scholar
  15. Suzuki K, Eriksson B, Shimizu H, Nagai T, Rodriguez- Martinez H. Effect of hyaluronan on monospermic penetration of porcine oocytes fertilized in vitro. Int J Androl. 2000;23:13–21.Google Scholar
  16. Tesarik J, Mendoza OC, Testart J. Effect of the human cumulus oophorus on movement characteristics of human capacitated spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;88:665–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong SJ, Chiu PC, Lee KF, Tse JMY, Ho PC, Yeung WSB. Establishment of a capillary-cumulus model to study the selection of sperm for fertilization by cumulus oophorus. Human Reprod. 2004;19:1562–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Abbas AM, Elattar I. The life span of sperm motility and pattern in cumulus coculture. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:660–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hossain AM, Rizk B, Huff C, Helvacioglu A, Thorneycroft IH. Human sperm bioassay has potential in evaluating the quality of cumulus-oocyte complexes. Arch Androl. 1996;37:7–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun TT, Chung CM, Chan HC. Acrosome reaction in the cumulus oophorus revisted. Involvement of a novel sperm-released factor NYD-SP8. Protein Cell. 2011;2:92–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Franken DR, Bastiaan HS. Can a cumulus cell complex be used to select spermatozoa for assisted reproduction? Andrologia. 2009;41:369–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Roldan ER, Murase T, Shi QX. Exocytosis in spermatozoa in response to progesterone and zona pellucida. Science. 1994;266:1578–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Osman RA, Andria ML, Jones AD, Meizel S. Steroid induced exocytosis: The human sperm acrosome reaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;160:828–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Meizel S, Turner KO, Nuccitelli R. Progesterone triggers a wave of increased free calcium during the human sperm acrosome reaction. Dev Biol. 1997;182:67–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Melendrez CS, Meizel S, Berger T. Comparison of the ability of progesterone and heat solubilized porcine zona pellucida to initiate the porcine sperm acrosome reaction in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;39:433–8.Google Scholar
  26. Harper CV, Joanne A, Cummerson JA, Michael RH, White MRH, Publicover SJ, et al. Dynamic resolution of acrosomal exocytosis in human sperm. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2130–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark GF. The role carbohydrate recognition during human sperm-egg binding. Human Reprod. 2013;28(3):566–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta SK, Bhandari B, Shrestha A, Biswal BK, Palaniappan C, Malhotra SS, et al. Mammalian zona pellucida glycoproteins: structure and function during fertilization. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349:665–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yanagimachi R. Mammalian sperm acrosome reaction: where does it begin before fertilization? Biol Reprod. 2011;85:4–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yanagimachi R, Phillips DM. The status of acrosome caps of hamster spermatozoa immediately before fertilization in vivo. Gamete Res. 1984;9:1–19.Google Scholar
  31. Kopf GS, Gerton GL. The mammalian sperm acrosome and the acrosome reaction. In:Elements of Mammalian Fertilization. Basic concepts (Wassarman, Ed). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1990. p. 153-2013.Google Scholar
  32. Florman HM, Ducibella T. Fertilization in mammals. In: Neill JD, editor. Physiology of reproduction. San Diego (CA): Elsevier; 2006. p. 55-112.Google Scholar
  33. Gupta SK, Bhandari B. Acrosome reaction: relevance of zona pellucida glycoproteins. Asian J Androl. 2010;13:97–105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jin M, Fujiwara E, Kakiuchi Y, Okabe M, Satouh Y, Baba SA, et al. Most fertilizing mouse spermatozoa begin their acrosome reaction before contact with the zona pellucida during in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(12):4892–6. Epub 2011 Mar 7.Google Scholar
  35. Stock CE, Bates R, Lindsay KS, Edmonds DK, Fraser LR. Human oocyte-cumulus complexes stimulate the human acrosome reaction. J Reprod Fertil. 1989;86:723–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Carrell DT, Middleton RG, Peterson CM, Jones KP, Urry RL. Role of the cumulus in the selection of morphologically normal sperm and induction of the acrosome reaction during human in vitro fertilization. Arch Androl. 1993;31:133–7.Google Scholar
  37. Sullivan R, Duchesne C, Fahmy N, Morin N, Dionne P. Protein synthesis and acrosome reaction–inducing activity of human cumulus cells. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:830–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Fetterolf PM, Jurisicova A, Tyson JE, Casper RF. Conditioned medium from human cumulus oophorus cells stimulates human sperm velocity. Biol Reprod. 1994;51:184–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bains R, Miles DM, Carson RJ, Adeghe J. Hyaluronic acid increases motility/ intracellular CA2þ concentration in human sperm in vitro. Arch Androl. 2001;47:119–25.Google Scholar
  40. Sun F, Bahat A, Gakamsky A, Girsh E, Katz N, Giojalas LC, et al. Human sperm chemotaxis: both the oocyte and its surrounding cumulus cells secrete sperm chemoattractants. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:761–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gurevich M, Harel-Markowitz E, Marcus S, Shore LS, Shemesh M. Prostaglandin production by the oocyte cumulus complex around the time of fertilization and the effect of prostaglandin E on the development of the early bovine embryo. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 1993;5:281–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Viggiano JM, Herrero MB, Cebral E, Boquet MG, de Gimeno MF. Prostaglandin synthesis by cumulus–oocyte complexes: effects on in vitro fertilization in mice. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes, and Essential Fatty Acids. 1995;53:261–5.Google Scholar
  43. Jaiswal BS, Tur-Kaspa I, Dor J, Mashiach S, Eisenbach M. Human sperm chemotaxis: is progesterone a chemoattractant? Biology of Reproduction. 1999;60:1314–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Osman RA, Andria ML, Jones AD, Meizel S. Steroid induced exocytosis: the human sperm acrosome reaction. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1989;160:828–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Chian RC, Ao A, Clarke HJ, Tulandi T, Tan SL. Production of steroids from human cumulus cells treated with different concentrations of gonadotropins during culture in vitro. Fertility and Sterility. 1999;71:61–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Vanderhyden BC, Tonary AM. Differential regulation of progesterone and estradiol production by mouse cumulus and mural granulosa cells by A factor(s) secreted by the oocyte. Biology of Reproduction. 1995;53:1243–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yamashita Y, Shimada M, Okazaki T, Maeda T, Terada T. Production of progesterone from de novo-synthesized cholesterol in cumulus cells and its physiological role during meiotic resumption of porcine oocytes. Biology of Reproduction. 2003;68:1193–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Guidobaldi HA, Teves ME, Unates DR, Anastasia A, Giojalas LC. Progesterone from the cumulus cells is the sperm chemoattractant secreted by the rabbit oocyte cumulus complex. PLoS ONE. 2008;3, e3040.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. de Lamirande E, Tsai C, Harakat A, Gagnon C. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in human sperm acrosome reaction induced by A23187, lysophosphatidylcholine, and biological fluid ultrafiltrates. J Androl. 1998;19:585–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Garbi M, Rubinstein S, Lax Y, Breitbart H. Activation of Protein Kinase Cα in the Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Bovine Sperm Acrosome Reaction and Phospholipase D1 Regulation. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:1271–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wassarman PM. The zona pellucida: a cost of many colors. Bioessays. 1987;6:133–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Pérez Aguirreburualde MS, Fernández S, Córdoba M. Acrosin activity regulation by protein Kinase C and tyrosine kinase in bovine sperm acrosome exocytosis induced by lysophosphatidylcholine. Reprod Dom Anim. 2012;47:915–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Hama K, Bandoh K, Kakehi Y, Aoki J, Arai H. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors are activated differentially by biological fluids: possible role of LPA binding proteins in activation of LPA receptors. FEBS Lett. 2002;523:187–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tanaka M, Kishi Y, Takanezawa Y, Kakehi Y, Aoki J, Arai H. Prostatic acid phosphatase degrades lysophosphatidic acid in seminal plasma. FEBS Lett. 2004;571:197–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tokumura A, Miyake M, Nishioka Y, Yamano S, Aono T, Fukuzawa K. Production of lysophosphatidic acids by lysophospholipase D in human follicular fluids of in vitro fertilization patients. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:195–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Chen SU, Chou CH, Lee H, Ho CH, Lin CW, Yang YS. Lysophosphatidic acid up-regulates expression of interleukin-8 and −6 in granulose-lutein cells through its receptors and nuclear factor kappa B dependent pathways: implications for angiogenesis of corpus luteum and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:935–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tesarik J. Comparision of acrosome reaction-inducing activities of human cumulus oophprus, follicular fluid ans ionophore A23187 in human sperm populations of proven fertilizing ability in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1985;74:383–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Suarez SS, Wolf DP, Meizel S. Induction of the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa by a fraction of human follicular fluid. Gamete Res. 1986;14:107–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Calvo L, Vantman D, Banks S, Tezón J, Koukoulis G, Dennison L, et al. Follicular fluid induced acrosome reaction distinguishes a subgroup of men eith unexplained infertility not identified by semen analysis. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:1048–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (5th Edn). Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  61. Mortimer D, Mortimer ST. Methods of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1992;21:517–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Aitken RJ, Brindle JP. Analysis of the ability of three probes targeting the outer acrosomal membrane or acrosomal contents to detect the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1663–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Gómez-Torres MJ, Avilés M, Girela JL, Murcia V, Fernández-Colom PJ, Romeu A, et al. Characterization of the lectin binding pattern in human spermatozoa after swim-up selection. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27:1621–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Velthut-Meikas A, Simm J, Tuuri T, Tapanainen JS, Metsis M, Salumets A. Research resource: small RNA-seq of human granulosa cells reveals miRNAs in FSHR and aromatase genes. Mol Endocrinol. 2013;27:1128–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Yan L, Yang M, Guo H, Yang L, Wu J, Li R, et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20:1131–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Xue Z, Huang K, Cai C, Cai L, Jiang CY, Feng Y, et al. Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature. 2013;500:593–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mao C, Obeid LM. Ceramidases: regulators of cellular responses mediated by ceramide, sphingosine, and sphingosine-1-phosphate. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1781;2008:424–34.Google Scholar
  68. Li CM, Park JH, He X, Levy B, Chen F, Arai K, et al. The human acid ceramidase gene (ASAH): structure, chromosomal location, mutation analysis, and expression. Genomics. 1999;62:223–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Mizutani Y, Kihara A, Igarashi Y. Identification of the human sphingolipid C4-hydroxylase, hDES2, and its up-regulation during keratinocyte differentiation. FEBS Lett. 2004;563:93–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Mao C, Xu R, Szulc ZM, Bielawska A, Galadari SH, Obeid LM. Cloning and characterization of a novel human alkaline ceramidase. A mammalian enzyme that hydrolyzes phytoceramide. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:26577–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ikawa M, Inoue N, Benhham AM, Okabe M. Fertilization: a sperm’s journey to and interaction with the oocyte. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:984–94.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Vigil P, Orellana RF, Cortés ME. Modulation of spermatozoa acrosome reaction. Biol Res. 2011;44:151–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Fleming AD, Yanagimachi R. Effects of various lipids on the acrosome reaction and fertilizing capacity of guinea pig spermatozoa with special reference to the possible involvement of lysophospholipids in the acrosome reaction. Gamete Res. 1981;4:253–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Ohzu E, Yanagimachi R. Acceleration of acrosome reaction in hamster spermatozoa by lysolecithin. J Exp Zool. 1982;224:259–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Byrd W, Wolf DP. Acrosomal status in fresh and capacitated human ejaculated sperm. Biol Reprod. 1986;34:859–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Lepage N, Miron P, Hemmings R, Roberts KD, Langlais J. Distribution of lysophospholipids and metabolism of platelet-activating factor in human follicular and peritoneal fluids. J Reprod Fertil. 1993;98:349–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Glander HJ, Schiller J, Süss R, Paasch U, Grunewald S, Arnhold J. Deterioration of spermatozoal plasma membrane is associated with an increase of sperm lyso-phosphatidylcholines. Andrología. 2002;34:360–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Chen WY, Ni Y, Pan YM, Shi QX, Yan YY, Chen AJ, et al. GABA, progesterona and zona pellucida activation of PLA2 and regulation by MEK-ERK1/2 during acrosomal exocytosis in guinea pig spermatozoa. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:4692–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Shi QX, Chen WY, Yuan YY, Mao LZ, Yu SQ, Chen AJ, et al. Progeterone primes zona pellucid-induced activation of phospholipase A2 during acrosomal exocytosis in guinea pig spermatozoa. J Cell Physiol. 2005;205:344–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Yuan YY, Chen WY, Shi QX, Mao LZ, Yu SQ, Fang X, et al. Zona pellucid induces activation of phospholipase A2 during acrosomal exocytosis in guinea pig spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:904–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Li K, Jin JY, Chen WY, Shi QX, Ni Y, Roldan ER. Secretory phospholipase A2 group IID Is involved in progesterone-induced acrosomal exocytosis of human spermatozoa. J Androl. 2012;33:975–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Riffo MS, Párraga M. Role of phospholipase A2 in mammalian sperm-egg fusion: development of hamster oolemma fusibility by lysophosphatidylcholine. J Exp Zool. 1997;279(1):81–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Riffo M, Nieto A. Lysophosphatidylcholine induces changes in physicochemical, morphological, and functional properties of mouse zona pellucida: a possible role of phospholipase A2 in sperm-zona pellucida interaction. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999;53(1):68–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Bartke N, Hannun YA. Bioactive sphingolipids: metabolism and function. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:S91–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang Y, Li X, Becker KA, Gulbins E. Ceramide-enriched membrane domains–structure and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1788;2009:178–83.Google Scholar
  86. Perez GI, Jurisicova A, Matikainen T, Moriyama T, Kim MR, Takai Y, et al. A central role for ceramide in the age-related acceleration of apoptosis in the female germline. FASEB J. 2005;19:860–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Okabe K, Keenan RW, Schmidt G. Phytosphingosine groups as quantitatively significant components of the sphingolipids of the mucosa of the small intestines of some mammalian species. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1968;31:137–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Iwamori M, Costello C, Moser HW. Analysis and quantitation of free ceramide containing nonhydroxy and 2-hydroxy fatty acids, and phytosphingosine by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Lipid Res. 1979;20:86–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Coderch L, Lopez O, de la Maza A, Parra JL. Ceramides and skin function. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4:107–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Saisuga D, Shiba K, Inoue A, Hama K, Okutani M, Iida N, et al. Simultaneous quantitation of sphingoid bases and their phosphates in biological samples by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403:1897–905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Suhaiman L, De Blas GA, Obeid LM, Darszon MLS, Belmonte SA. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate and Sphingosine Kinase are involved in a novel signaling pathway leading to acrosomal exocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:16302–14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Ternes P, Franke S, Zähringer U, Sperling P, Heinz E. Identification and characterization of a sphingolipid delta 4-desaturase family. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:25512–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. O'Toole CM, Roldan ER, Fraser LR. Protein kinase C activation during progesterone-stimulated acrosomal exocytosis in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;12:921–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Berridge MJ. Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling. Nature. 1993;361:315–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Evershed RP, Prescott MC, Spooner N, Goad LJ. Negative ion ammonia chemical ionization and electron impact ionization mass spectrometric analysis of steryl fatty acyl esters. Steroids. 1989;53:285–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gómez-Torres et al. 2015

Advertisement