Open Access

Coexpression of adrenomedullin and its receptor component proteins in the reproductive system of the rat during gestation

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology20108:130

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-130

Received: 29 June 2010

Accepted: 29 October 2010

Published: 29 October 2010

Abstract

Background

Adrenomedullin (ADM), a novel vasorelaxant peptide, was found in human/rat ovaries and uteri. Plasma ADM level increases in pregnant women and pregnant rats.

Methods

The gene expression levels of Adm and its receptor components - Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3, the ADM peptide concentration and localization in the rat female reproductive system during gestation were studied by real-time RT-PCR, EIA and immunohistochemical techniques.

Results

The mRNAs of Adm and its receptor component and ADM were differentially distributed between implantation sites and inter-implantation sites of the pregnant uterus. The day on which vaginal sperm were found was taken to be pregnancy day 1. The Adm mRNA levels in the implantation sites of the uteri in mid- (day 12) and late pregnancy (day 17) were more than 10-fold higher than those in nonpregnancy, pre-implantation (day 3) or early (day 7) pregnancy. ADM was localized in the endometrial stroma with increased immunoreactivity from nonpregnancy to pregnancy. The ADM level and the mRNA levels of Adm, Crlr, Ramp2 and Ramp3 in the corpus luteum all increased in late pregnancy compared with early pregnancy. The gene expression of Adm and it receptor components and intense immunostaining of ADM were also found in the oviduct during pregnancy.

Conclusions

The gene expressions levels of Adm and its receptor components - Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3, and ADM peptide concentration exhibited a spatio-temporal pattern in the rat female reproductive system during gestation and this suggests that ADM may play important roles in gestation.

Background

Adrenomedullin (ADM) was a novel potent vasodilator first discovered in human pheochromatocytoma tissue in 1993 [1]. The Adm gene and its protein product are highly conserved across species, including human, rat, pig and cow [25]. It is a member of the calcitonin family with a high sequence homology to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). It consists of 52 amino acids in human and 50 amino acids in the rats [2, 3]. ADM can bind to the CGRP receptor in several types of tissues [6, 7], but specific ADM receptors that are insensitive to CGRP receptor antagonist have been identified [8]. McLatchie et al. [9] demonstrated that the combination of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) isoforms determines the ligand selectivity for CGRP and ADM. Coexpression of CRLR with RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 produces the CGRP, the ADM1 and ADM2 receptors respectively.

ADM is synthesized and secreted by various organs and tissues, including the heart, kidney, lung, adrenal gland and reproductive organs, such as the ovary [1014], the uterus [10, 15], the oviduct [14], the testis [1619], the prostate [20, 21], and the epididymis [22]. Since its discovery as a potent vasodilator, there have been extensive studies on the pleiotropic effects of ADM [2326]. Remarkable increases in plasma ADM concentrations were reported in both in human [27] and the rat [28] during pregnancy. ADM found in granulosa cells enhances progesterone production in human [13] and suppresses FSH-stimulated granulosa cell differentiation in the rat [11] by an autocrine action. The increases in ADM expression and binding sites in the rat uterus in late gestation [15] may be related to the inhibitory role of ADM in uterine contractility [15, 29]. The infusion of an ADM antagonist (hADM22-52) during early or late gestation in the rats caused fetoplacental growth restriction [30, 31]. The Adm-/- mice are non-viable [3234]; and the haploinsufficient (Adm+/-) female mice were reported to have reduced pregnancy success [35], in support of a highly essential role for ADM in gestation especially in fetal growth and development. The expression of ADM and its receptors in the ovary and the oviduct of the cycling rats has been studied by our group and ADM was found to inhibit FSH-induced estradiol secretion from follicles and eCG-stimulated progesterone release in corpora lutea [14]. We hypothesize that the distribution and levels of ADM and its receptors may change at different stages of pregnancy according to the roles of ADM. The expression of ADM and its receptors in the uterus, the oviduct and the corpus luteum in the rats of early, mid- or late pregnancy was therefore studied for possible physiological roles of ADM during gestation.

Methods

Animals

Mature Sprague-Dawley rats (12-13 week old) were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Unit, LKS Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong. Female rats showing three consecutive regular oestrous cycles were included in this study. The rats were housed at a constant temperature, humidity, under a 12-hour light-dark cycle (dark period 07:00 h to 19:00h) and rat chow and water were available ad libitum. Proestrus females were caged with proven fertile males overnight. The presence of vaginal sperm the following morning was taken evidence of pregnancy and this was day 1 of pregnancy. Rats of pre-implantation, early, mid- and late pregnancy were killed on days 3, 7, 12 and 17 of gestation. Pseudopregnant females obtained by mating with vasectomized male rats were also killed on day 7 of pseudopregnancy. Diestrus females were killed as nonpregnant controls. The uteri were dissected and implantation sites and inter-implantation sites were separated on days 7, 12 and 17 pregnancy. The foetuses and placentae of day 12 and 17 pregnant rats were collected before the dissection of the uteri. The ovaries were collected and the corpora lutea were isolated under a dissecting microscope using two 26G syringe needles. The oviducts were also collected and all the tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further analysis. Freshly collected intact uteri, ovaries and oviducts were fixed in neutral buffered formalin for immunohistochemical study. All procedures were approved by the Committee on the Use of Live Animals for Teaching and Research, the University of Hong Kong.

Genes expression of Adm, Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3

Total RNA of the uterus, corpus luteum, oviduct, foetus and placenta were extracted using TRIZOL reagent and subjected to real-time RT-PCR analysis. RNA samples (1 μg) were reverse transcribed into cDNA with the iScript reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The real-time RT-PCR technique has been previously described [15]. Standard curves for each primer pair were prepared using serial dilution of the cDNA to determine PCR efficiency. The PCR efficiencies for Adm, Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2, Ramp3 and Actb were all above 0.95 and similar. The relative gene expression levels normalized to Actb were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method, where CT was the cycle threshold. The reaction mixtures contained 25 μl iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), 500 nM of each primer, 1 μl template cDNA, and DNase-free water to a final volume of 50 μl. Cycle conditions were 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 45 sec, 59°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 45 sec. The reaction was completed with a dissociation step for melting point analysis from 50°C to 95°C (in increments of 0.5°C for 10 sec each. The primers were designed on the basis of the published sequences of Adm (caggacaagcagagcacgtc, forward; tctggcggtagcgtttgac, reverse); Crlr (ccaaacagacttgggagtcactagg, forward; gctgtcttctctttctcatgcgtgc, reverse); Ramp1 (cactcactgcaccaaactcgtg, forward; cagtcatgagcagtgtgaccgtaa, reverse); Ramp2 (aggtattacagcaacctgcggt, forward; acatcctctgggggatcggaga, reverse); Ramp3 (acctgtcggagttcatcgtg, forward; acttcatccggggggtcttc, reverse) and Actb (ggaaatcgtgcgtgacatta, forward; aggaaggaaggctggaagag, reverse). Melt curve analysis for each primer set revealed only one peak for each product. The size of the PCR products was confirmed by comparing the size of the product with a commercial ladder after agarose gel electrophoresis.

Immunocytochemistry (IHC)

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5 μm sections of paraffin-embedded tissues with a peroxidase-labeling kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). The antiserum against rat ADM (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Burlingame, CA) was used at a final dilution of 1:500. Staining was visualized using a DAB substrate kit for peroxidase (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). The antibody was omitted from control sections to check for nonspecific staining.

Extraction of ADM from the uterus, ovary, oviduct, foetus and placenta

Tissues including the uterus, corpus luteum, oviduct, foetus and placenta were homogenized in 2N ice-cold acetic acid and then boiled for 10 min. A 50 μl aliquot was taken for Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The remaining homogenates were centrifuged at 18, 600 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatants were lyophilized and stored at -20°C.

ADM Enzyme Immuno Assay (EIA)

The lyophilized tissue samples were reconstituted in 1X ADM EIA assay buffer. ADM peptide concentrations were measured in duplicates using an ADM (1-50) (rat) EIA kit (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Burlingame, CA). The minimum detectable concentration was 0.15 ng/ml and the range was 0-100 ng/ml. The intra-assay and inter-assay errors were less than 5% and 14% respectively.

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as mean ± SEM. When there was only one variable, One-way ANOVA with the Fisher's Least Significance Difference post-hoc test was employed. When there were two variables, 2-way ANOVA was used. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Expression of Adm and its receptor components in the uterus, foetus, placenta, corpus luteum and oviduct during pregnancy

The results for the mRNA levels of Adm and its receptor components, Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3 were shown in Figure 1. In the uterus, Adm was differentially expressed between implantation and inter-implantation sites. Adm mRNA levels at the implantation sites of mid- (12-day) and late (17-day) pregnant rats were much higher than those of the inter-implantation sites (Figure 1A), which had values similar to those in the uteri of nonpregnant, pre-implantation (3-day) and early (7-day) pregnant rats (Figure 1A). The Adm mRNA levels of the uteri from the pseudopregnant rats were 80% of those from the nonpregnant rats (0.80 ± 0.10, n = 11 vs 1.00 ± 0.08, n = 14) and the values were not significantly different. There were also increases in Crlr (Figure 1B) and Ramp1 (Figure 1C) mRNA levels in implantation sites at late pregnancy compared with early pregnancy. For the Ramp2 (Figure 1D) and Ramp3 (Figure 1E) mRNA levels, there was a trend for a decrease from early to late pregnancy in both the implantation and inter-implantation sites. The mRNA levels of ADM receptor component proteins were also differentially expressed (Figure 1B-E). During early pregnancy, the expression levels of Crlr, Ramp1 and Ramp2 were all higher at inter-implantation sites than implantation sites (Figure 1B-D) and the reverse was true for Ramp3 (Figure 1E). During late gestation, the relative expression levels of Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3 between implantation sites and inter-implantation sites were opposite to those in the early gestation, with higher levels of Crlr, Ramp1 and Ramp2 at implantation sites (Figure 1B-D) and higher Ramp3 level at inter-implantation sites (Figure 1E). During mid-gestation, the expression levels of both Crlr and Ramp3 at the implantation sites were higher than inter-implantation sites and that of Ramp1 were lower at the implantation sites (Figure 1B-E).
Figure 1

Expression of Adm and its receptor components in the uterus from early, mid- and late pregnant rat. Expression of Adm (A), Crlr (B), Ramp1 (C), Ramp2 (D) and Ramp3 (E) in the uterus from nonpregnant rats and rats of different pregnancy stages. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 for nonpregnancy, and pre-implantation, n = 6 for implantation sites and inter-implantation sites of early, mid- and late pregnancy.

The gene expression levels of Adm, Ramp1 and Ramp3 of the placenta were higher than those of the foetus in both mid- and late gestation (Figure 2). The mRNA levels of Adm and Ramp3 in the placenta were higher in mid-gestation than in late gestation. The foetus had a higher Adm, Crlr, Ramp1 and Ramp3 mRNA levels in late gestation than mid-gestation (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Expression of Adm and its receptor components in the foetuses and placentae. Expression of Adm, Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3 in the foetuses and placenta from mid- and late pregnancy. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. n = 6-8 for foetus, n = 6 for placenta.

In the corpus luteum (Figure 3), the Adm mRNA levels were dramatically increased in mid- and late gestation. The mRNA levels of receptor components Crlr, Ramp2 and Ramp3 in late gestation were also elevated. The mRNA levels of Ramp3 showed a continual increase from nonpregnancy to late gestation.
Figure 3

Expression of Adm and its receptor components in the corpus luteum from early, mid- and late pregnant rat. Expression of Adm, Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3 in the corpus luteum from nonpregnant rats and rats of different pregnancy stages. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3.

In the oviduct (Figure 4), the expression levels of Adm decreased from pre-implantation to late pregnancy. The expression levels of Crlr were much lower from early to late gestation than pre-implantation. There was no significant difference in the expression levels of Ramp1, Ramp2 or Ramp3.
Figure 4

Expression of Adm and its receptor components in the oviduct from early, mid- and late pregnant rat. Expression of Adm, Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3 in the oviduct from nonpregnant rats and rats of different pregnancy stages. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. n = 6-7.

ADM peptide levels in the uterus, foetus, placenta, corpus luteum and oviduct during pregnancy

In the uterus, ADM was differentially distributed between the implantation sites and inter-implantation sites in both early and late gestation (Figure 5A). While there was no differences between the uterus samples from nonpregnant (234 ± 12 pg/mg protein, n = 15) and pseudopregnant (230 ± 19 pg/mg protein, n = 12) rats, the ADM level was higher in inter-implantation sites than implantation sites in early and mid-pregnancy and the opposite was true in late pregnancy (Figure 5A). Overall, the inter-implantation sites in early pregnancy had the highest level of ADM peptide. The ADM levels in the inter-implantation sites in early pregnancy declined at mid- and late pregnancy. The foetuses from mid-pregnant rats showed a higher ADM level than the placentae from mid-pregnant rats (Figure 5B). The placental ADM levels decreased from mid-gestation to late gestation (Figure 5B). The ADM levels in the corpora lutea of nonpregnant and late pregnancy rats were higher than those from early and mid-pregnant rats (Figure 5C). The ADM levels of the oviduct were higher at pre-implantation and decreased in late pregnancy (Figure 5D).
Figure 5

ADM peptide levels in the uterus, foetus and placenta, corpus luteum, and oviduct. ADM peptide levels in the uterus (A) from nonpregnant rats and rats of different pregnancy stages, in the foetus and placenta from mid- to late pregnant rats (B), and in the corpus luteum (C), oviduct (D) from nonpregnant rats and rats of different pregnancy stages. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3-9.

Immunohistochemical study of ADM in the female reproductive system

The nonpregnant uterus showed ADM positive staining at endometrium (Figure 6A) and weak staining at myometrium and serosa (data not shown). The uteri of early pregnant (7-day) rats with implanted embryos showed heavier ADM staining than those of nonpregnant rats, especially in the decidua (Figure 6B). The embryo was also positive for ADM (Figure 6D). In the endometrium, ADM staining was also found in the luminal epithelium (Figure 6C), the glandular epithelia cells (Figure 6E) and the endothelial lining of the blood vessels (Figure 6F).
Figure 6

Immunocytochemical study of ADM in the uterus from nonpregnant and early pregnant rats. Immunocytochemical study of ADM in the rat uterus from nonpregnant (A) and early pregnant rats (B-F) showing positive ADM immunoreactivity localized to the decidua (B), the luminal epithelium (C), the embryo (asterisk, D), glandular epithelial cells (E) and endothelial linings of the blood vessels (F) of the uterus from early pregnant rats.

In the ovary from the nonpregnant rats, ADM positive staining was localized to interstitial cells, ovum, cumulus oophorus and granulose cells of the follicles (Figure 7A) and luteal cells of the corpus luteum (Figure 7B). In the pregnant rats, the majority of the ovarian volume was taken up by the growing corpora lutea, which were also the main location of ADM staining. There was no obvious difference in the density of ADM staining in the corpus luteum from nonpregnant rats to pregnant rats (data not shown), though there was heavy ADM staining at the centre of some corpora lutea from late pregnant rats (Figure 7C).
Figure 7

Immunocytochemical study of ADM in rat ovary and oviduct. Immunocytochemical study of ADM in the ovary (A, B, C) and oviduct (D) showing positive ADM immunostaining in the follicles (A) and corpora lutea (B). Intense ADM immunostaining was found at the centre of some corpora lutea from late pregnant rats (C) and oviduct (D).

In the oviduct, intense ADM staining was localized in the mucosal layer of the oviduct, especially in the ciliated epithelium from nonpregnant and pregnant rats (Figure 7D). The muscularis and serosa layers of the oviduct showed little ADM staining.

There was no staining in the negative controls (see Additional file 1, Figure S1).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge this is the first time course study of ADM and its receptor component proteins in pregnancy in the female reproductive tract and corpus luteum. In our previous study in the rat, the oviduct expressed the highest level of ADM in the female reproductive tract during the oestrous cycle [14]; but ADM and its mRNA have not been characterized in the pregnant rats. ADM was most intense in the ciliated epithelium. CGRP is known to inhibit contractility in the human oviducts [36] and CGRP-binding sites are found on the vascular smooth muscle cells [37]. Endothelin 2 has been shown to stimulate oviductal contraction in the rat [38] and ADM may inhibit this effect (Liao, Ho, Tang and O, unpulished data). Recently, we have also demonstrated that the presence of sperm in the oviduct stimulates ADM production, which in turn stimulates ciliary beating in the rat [39] and human [40] oviducts. During pregnancy, the increase in ADM peptide in the pre-implantation period may be related to the presence of sperm in the oviduct as well as its inhibitory action on oviductal contraction, which facilitate the ova/embryo transportation into the uterus. The decreases in ADM peptide and Adm mRNA levels in late pregnancy and in Crlr mRNA in mid- and late pregnancy may indicate that this inhibition is less important after placenta formation.

The most dramatic changes in ADM peptide and mRNA expression occurred in the uterus during pregnancy. Both the Adm mRNA and ADM were differentially distributed between implantation and inter-implantation sites. The lack of a difference in Adm mRNA levels and ADM peptide levels between the nonpregnant uterus and the pseudo-pregnant uterus suggests that such changes in the implantation sites must be due to the contact between the embryo and the uterus instead of alterations in hormone levels in the systemic circulation. In early gestation, ADM levels and mRNA levels of Crlr, Ramp1, and Ramp2 in the inter-implantation sites were higher than in implantation sites, in line with a role for ADM to increase blood supply [41] and to inhibit uterine contractility [42]. Adm mRNA levels in the implantation sites of the uteri from mid- and late pregnant rats were much higher than the inter-implantation sites. The differences were much less marked in ADM peptide levels, suggesting a possible increase in release. An increase in Adm mRNA level in the uteri of pregnant rats has been previously reported [14]. Plasma ADM levels are elevated in pregnant rats [28, 43] and pregnant women [27], presumably due to secretion by the uterus [14, 41] for the adaptation of the vascular system to pregnancy [44]. The very high level of Adm mRNA and high levels of Crlr and Ramp1 mRNA at late pregnancy suggests an increasingly important role of ADM towards term.

The gene expression levels of Crlr and Ramp1 were higher at the implantation sites of late pregnancy than those in the uteri of nonpregnant rats, in line with a previous report of an increase in ADM binding sites in late pregnancy [14]. This change may increase the number of CGRP receptors and augment the action of ADM, the expression of which was also increased. It is pertinent to note that ADM has been shown to inhibit uterine contraction via the CGRP receptor [14]. The increase in Crlr and Ramp1 gene expression from early to late pregnancy is also in line with the increase in CGRP receptor binding from day 7 of gestation [45]. CGRP is found in the nerves in the uterus [46] and inhibits uterine contraction [47] and causes vasorelaxation of the uterine artery [48].

Active angiogenesis is observed during early to mid-pregnancy to meet the need for an increase in blood supply [49]. ADM have been proposed to exhibit its pro-angiogenic actions through CRLR/RAMP2 and CRLR/RAMP3 receptors [50] or CRLR/RAMP2 receptor [51]. The high Crlr, Ramp2 and Ramp3 expression levels in the uterus in early and mid-pregnancy might contribute to the increased action of ADM in angiogenesis. Immunohistochemical study showed that ADM were located mainly in the endometrial stroma, similar to the finding of Cameron et al. [10, 52]. In our study, a trend for an increase in ADM immunoreactivity was observed from nonpregnant uterus to the pregnant uterus. The nonpregnant and 3-day pregnant uteri showed limited ADM staining in the epithelial cells lining the uterus while in early pregnancy, stronger staining was localized not only in the epithelium, but also in the blood vessels. The intense ADM immunostaining in the blood vessels suggests both an angiogenic role [42] and a vasodilatory role [43] in the endometrial blood vessels for increasing blood supply. ADM may have multiple roles in the uterus, regulating angiogenesis and blood flow in early pregnancy and maintaining uterine quiescence at mid- and late pregnancy. Studies involving the infusion of ADM receptor antagonist in early [31] and late [30] gestation have also demonstrated the importance of ADM in placentation and embryo development. The infusion of the ADM2 receptor antagonist in late pregnancy produced similar results [53].

Both the levels of ADM peptide and Adm mRNA in the placenta were lower in late pregnancy than mid-pregnancy. The mRNA levels of Ramp3 also showed a similar decline. To the best of our knowledge, this finding has not been described before in the rat placenta. In human, the concentrations of ADM mRNA in the placenta were found to be greater at term than in the first trimester [54]. The significance of these changes remains an enigma. The mRNA levels of Adm, Crlr, Ramp1 and Ramp3 in the foetus were higher in late pregnancy than mid-pregnancy. This is related to the importance of ADM in embryogenesis as ADM is involved in embryonic invasion, proliferation, and differentiation, based on the developmental expression patterns of ADM in the rat and mouse embryos [55]. The Adm gene expression in the placenta was higher while the peptide levels were lower than those in the foetus in mid- and late pregnancy, suggesting an increase in ADM release from the placenta. Human placenta has indeed been proposed to be the source of foetal circulating ADM as the ADM concentration in the umbilical vein was higher than in the artery [27].

The corpus luteum was studied instead of the entire ovary because it contains most of the ADM, as reported here and by Li et al. [14]. The mRNA levels of Adm, Crlr and Ramp2 and Ramp3 in the corpus luteum all increased in late pregnancy compared with nonpregnancy, pre-implantation and early pregnancy and ADM peptide levels also increased at late pregnancy compared with early and mid-pregnancy. These increases may be related to the postulated roles of ADM in anti-luteolysis [12] and the production of progesterone [14]. ADM appears to play a double role in corpus luteum progesterone production in that it is inhibitory in early and late pregnancy but stimulatory in mid-pregnancy (Li et al. unpublished data). The stimulatory effect of ADM on steroidogenesis has been reported in human granulosa-lutein cells [13].

Conclusions

In summary, there is a spatio-temporal pattern for the gene expression levels of Adm and its receptor components - Crlr, Ramp1, Ramp2 and Ramp3, the ADM peptide concentration and localization in the rat female reproductive system during gestation. In the oviduct, an increase in ADM peptide was found only in the preimplantation stage when the gametes/embryos were present in this part of the reproductive tract. During early pregnancy, the contact of embryo in the implantations sites upregulated ADM peptide and mRNA expression. The increase was further augmented in mid-pregnancy and similar increase was found in the placentae and the expression was comparatively low in the foetuses. A dramatic increase in ADM peptide and mRNA expression was also found in the corpus luteum during mid- and late pregnancy. All these changes suggest important roles for ADM in the maintenance of pregnancy as well as embryogenesis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was substantially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council (RGC) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (HKU 7736/07M).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
(2)
Department of Anatomy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
(3)
Centre of Heart, Brain, Hormone and Healthy Aging, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
(4)
Centre of Reproduction, Development and Growth, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong

References

  1. Kitamura K, Kangawa K, Kawamoto M, Ichiki Y, Nakamura S, Matsuo H, Eto T: Adrenomedullin: a novel hypotensive peptide isolated from human pheochromocytoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993, 192: 553-560. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sakata J, Shimokubo T, Kitamura K, Nakamura S, Kangawa K, Matsuo H, Eto T: Molecular cloning and biological activities of rat adrenomedullin, a hypotensive peptide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993, 195: 921-927. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kitamura K, Sakata J, Kangawa K, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Eto T: Cloning and characterization of cDNA encoding a precursor for human adrenomedullin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993, 194: 720-725. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kitamura K, Kangawa K, Kojima M, Ichiki Y, Matsuo H, Eto T: Complete amino acid sequence of porcine adrenomedullin and cloning of cDNA encoding its precursor. FEBS Lett. 1994, 338: 306-310. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80289-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kitamura K, Matsui E, Kato J, Katoh F, Kita T, Tsuji T, Kangawa K, Eto T: Adrenomedullin (11-26): a novel endogenous hypertensive peptide isolated from bovine adrenal medulla. Peptides. 2001, 22: 1713-1718. 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00529-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eguchi S, Hirata Y, Kano H, Sato K, Watanabe Y, Watanabe TX, Nakajima K, Sakakibara S, Marumo F: Specific receptors for adrenomedullin in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 1994, 340: 226-230. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80143-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Entzeroth M, Doods HN, Wieland HA, Wienen W: Adrenomedullin mediates vasodilation via CGRP1 receptors. Life Sci. 1995, 56: PL19-25. 10.1016/0024-3205(94)00412-L.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kapas S, Catt KJ, Clark AJ: Cloning and expression of cDNA encoding a rat adrenomedullin receptor. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 25344-25347. 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. McLatchie LM, Fraser NJ, Main MJ, Wise A, Brown J, Thompson N, Solari R, Lee MG, Foord SM: RAMPs regulate the transport and ligand specificity of the calcitonin-receptor-like receptor. Nature. 1998, 393: 333-339. 10.1038/30666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron VA, Fleming AM: Novel sites of adrenomedullin gene expression in mouse and rat tissues. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 2253-2264. 10.1210/en.139.5.2253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Abe K, Minegishi T, Tano M, Hirakawa T, Tsuchiya M, Kangawa K, Kojima M, Ibuki Y: Expression and effect of adrenomedullin on rat granulosa cell. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 5263-5266. 10.1210/en.139.12.5263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Abe K, Minegishi T, Ibuki Y, Kojima M, Kangawa K: Expression of adrenomedullin in the human corpus luteum. Fertil Steril. 2000, 74: 141-145. 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00585-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Moriyama T, Otani T, Maruo T: Expression of adrenomedullin by human granulosa lutein cells and its effect on progesterone production. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000, 142: 671-676. 10.1530/eje.0.1420671.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Li YY, Li L, Hwang IS, Tang F, O WS: Coexpression of adrenomedullin and its receptors in the reproductive system of the rat: effects on steroid secretion in rat ovary. Biol Reprod. 2008, 79: 200-208. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Upton PD, Austin C, Taylor GM, Nandha KA, Clark AJ, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Smith DM: Expression of adrenomedullin (ADM) and its binding sites in the rat uterus: increased number of binding sites and ADM messenger ribonucleic acid in 20-day pregnant rats compared with nonpregnant rats. Endocrinology. 1997, 138: 2508-2514. 10.1210/en.138.6.2508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sakata J, Shimokubo T, Kitamura K, Nishizono M, Iehiki Y, Kangawa K, Matsuo H, Eto T: Distribution and characterization of immunoreactive rat adrenomedullin in tissue and plasma. FEBS Lett. 1994, 352: 105-108. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00928-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li YY, Hwang IS, O WS, Tang F: Adrenomedullin peptide: gene expression of adrenomedullin, its receptors and receptor activity modifying proteins, and receptor binding in rat testis--actions on testosterone secretion. Biol Reprod. 2006, 75: 183-188. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.052274.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan YF, O WS, Tang F: Adrenomedullin in the rat testis. I: Its production, actions on testosterone secretion, regulation by human chorionic gonadotropin, and its interaction with endothelin 1 in the leydig cell. Biol Reprod. 2008, 78: 773-779. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060871.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chan YF, Tang F, O WS: Adrenomedullin in the rat testis. II: Its production, actions on inhibin secretion, regulation by follicle-stimulating hormone, and its interaction with endothelin 1 in the Sertoli cell. Biol Reprod. 2008, 78: 780-785. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pewitt EB, Haleem R, Wang Z: Adrenomedullin gene is abundantly expressed and directly regulated by androgen in the rat ventral prostate. Endocrinology. 1999, 140: 2382-2386. 10.1210/en.140.5.2382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jimenez N, Calvo A, Martinez A, Rosell D, Cuttitta F, Montuenga LM: Expression of adrenomedullin and proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide in human and rat prostate. J Histochem Cytochem. 1999, 47: 1167-1178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang IS, Autelitano DJ, Wong PY, Leung GP, Tang F: Co-expression of adrenomedullin and adrenomedullin receptors in rat epididymis: distinct physiological actions on anion transport. Biol Reprod. 2003, 68: 2005-2012. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.011015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor MM, Samson WK: Adrenomedullin and central cardiovascular regulation. Peptides. 2001, 22: 1803-1807. 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00522-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kusaka I, Ishikawa S, Fujita N, Higashiyama M, Honda K, Okada K, Saito T: Inhibition by adrenomedullin of arginine vasopressin-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase in rat glomerular mesangial cells via cAMP production. Hypertens Res. 1996, 19: 113-119. 10.1291/hypres.19.113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ando K, Ito Y, Kumada M, Fujita T: Oxidative stress increases adrenomedullin mRNA levels in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertens Res. 1998, 21: 187-191. 10.1291/hypres.21.187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawai J, Ando K, Shimosawa T, Harii K, Fujita T: Regional hemodynamic effects of adrenomedullin in Wistar rats: a comparison with calcitonin gene-related peptide. Hypertens Res. 2002, 25: 441-446. 10.1291/hypres.25.441.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Di Iorio R, Marinoni E, Letizia C, Villaccio B, Alberini A, Cosmi EV: Adrenomedullin production is increased in normal human pregnancy. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999, 140: 201-206. 10.1530/eje.0.1400201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jerat S, Kaufman S: Effect of pregnancy and steroid hormones on plasma adrenomedullin levels in the rat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1998, 76: 463-466. 10.1139/cjpp-76-4-463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yanagita T, Yamamoto R, Sugano T, Kobayashi H, Uezono Y, Yokoo H, Shiraishi S, Minami SI, Wada A: Adrenomedullin inhibits spontaneous and bradykinin-induced but not oxytocin- or prostaglandin F(2alpha)-induced periodic contraction of rat uterus. Br J Pharmacol. 2000, 130: 1727-1730. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703500.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Witlin AG, Li ZY, Wimalawansa SJ, Grady JJ, Grafe MR, Yallampalli C: Placental and fetal growth and development in late rat gestation is dependent on adrenomedullin. Biol Reprod. 2002, 67: 1025-1031. 10.1095/biolreprod.101.002196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Penchalaneni J, Wimalawansa SJ, Yallampalli C: Adrenomedullin antagonist treatment during early gestation in rats causes fetoplacental growth restriction through apoptosis. Biol Reprod. 2004, 71: 1475-1483. 10.1095/biolreprod.104.032086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shindo T, Kurihara Y, Nishimatsu H, Moriyama N, Kakoki M, Wang Y, Imai Y, Ebihara A, Kuwaki T, Ju KH: Vascular abnormalities and elevated blood pressure in mice lacking adrenomedullin gene. Circulation. 2001, 104: 1964-1971. 10.1161/hc4101.097111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Caron KM, Smithies O: Extreme hydrops fetalis and cardiovascular abnormalities in mice lacking a functional Adrenomedullin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 615-619. 10.1073/pnas.021548898.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shimosawa T, Matsui H, Xing G, Itakura K, Ando K, Fujita T: Organ-protective effects of adrenomedullin. Hypertens Res. 2003, 26 (Suppl): S109-112. 10.1291/hypres.26.S109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Li M, Wu Y, Caron KM: Haploinsufficiency for adrenomedullin reduces pinopodes and diminishes uterine receptivity in mice. Biol Reprod. 2008, 79: 1169-1175. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.069336.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Samuelson UE, Dalsgaard CJ, Lundberg JM, Hokfelt T: Calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibits spontaneous contractions in human uterus and fallopian tube. Neurosci Lett. 1985, 62: 225-230. 10.1016/0304-3940(85)90359-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nimmo AJ, Whitaker EM, Carstairs JR, Morrison JF: The autoradiographic localization of calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P receptors in human fallopian tube. Q J Exp Physiol. 1989, 74: 955-958.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Al-Alem L, Bridges PJ, Su W, Gong MC, Iglarz M, Ko C: Endothelin-2 induces oviductal contraction via endothelin receptor subtype A in rats. J Endocrinol. 2007, 193: 383-391. 10.1677/JOE-07-0089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Chiu PC, Liao S, Lam KK, Tang F, Ho JC, Ho PC, O WS, Yao YQ, Yeung WS: Adrenomedullin Regulates Sperm Motility and Oviductal Ciliary Beat via Cyclic Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate/Protein Kinase A and Nitric Oxide. Endocrinology. 2010, 151: 3336-47. 10.1210/en.2010-0077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Li HW, Liao SB, Chiu PC, Tam WW, Ho JC, Ng EH, Ho PC, Yeung WS, Tang F, O WS: Expression of Adrenomedullin in Human Oviduct, Its Regulation by the Hormonal Cycle and Contact with Spermatozoa, and Its Effect on Ciliary Beat Frequency of the Oviductal Epithelium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: E18-25. 10.1210/jc.2010-0273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yotsumoto S, Shimada T, Cui CY, Nakashima H, Fujiwara H, Ko MS: Expression of adrenomedullin, a hypotensive peptide, in the trophoblast giant cells at the embryo implantation site in mouse. Dev Biol. 1998, 203: 264-275. 10.1006/dbio.1998.9073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Di Iorio R, Marinoni E, Letizia C, Alo P, Villaccio B, Cosmi EV: Adrenomedullin, a new vasoactive peptide, is increased in preeclampsia. Hypertension. 1998, 32: 758-763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. van der Heijden OW, Essers YP, van Eyndhoven HW, Spaanderman ME, Aardenburg R, van Eys GJ, Peeters LL: Vascular expression of adrenomedullin is increased in Wistar rats during early pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005, 123: 35-40. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Di Iorio R, Marinoni E, Scavo D, Letizia C, Cosmi EV: Adrenomedullin in pregnancy. Lancet. 1997, 349: 328-10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62827-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yallampalli C, Gangula PR, Kondapaka S, Fang L, Wimalawansa S: Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors in the rat uterus during pregnancy and labor and by progesterone. Biol Reprod. 1999, 61: 1023-1030. 10.1095/biolreprod61.4.1023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Shew RL, Papka RE, McNeill DL, Yee JA: NADPH-diaphorase-positive nerves and the role of nitric oxide in CGRP relaxation of uterine contraction. Peptides. 1993, 14: 637-641. 10.1016/0196-9781(93)90157-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Shew RL, Papka RE, McNeill DL: Galanin and calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in nerves of the rat uterus: localization, colocalization, and effects on uterine contractility. Peptides. 1992, 13: 273-279. 10.1016/0196-9781(92)90108-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gangula PR, Thota C, Wimalawansa SJ, Bukoski RD, Yallampalli C: Mechanisms involved in calcitonin gene-related Peptide-induced relaxation in pregnant rat uterine artery. Biol Reprod. 2003, 69: 1635-1641. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.016725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zygmunt M, Herr F, Munstedt K, Lang U, Liang OD: Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003, 110 (Suppl 1): S10-18. 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00168-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Fernandez-Sauze S, Delfino C, Mabrouk K, Dussert C, Chinot O, Martin PM, Grisoli F, Ouafik L, Boudouresque F: Effects of adrenomedullin on endothelial cells in the multistep process of angiogenesis: involvement of CRLR/RAMP2 and CRLR/RAMP3 receptors. Int J Cancer. 2004, 108: 797-804. 10.1002/ijc.11663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Guidolin D, Albertin G, Spinazzi R, Sorato E, Mascarin A, Cavallo D, Antonello M, Ribatti D: Adrenomedullin stimulates angiogenic response in cultured human vascular endothelial cells: Involvement of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Peptides. 2008, 29: 2013-2023. 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.07.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Cameron VA, Autelitano DJ, Evans JJ, Ellmers LJ, Espiner EA, Nicholls MG, Richards AM: Adrenomedullin expression in rat uterus is correlated with plasma estradiol. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 282: E139-146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Chauhan M, Yallampalli U, Reed L, Yallampalli C: Adrenomedullin 2 antagonist infusion to rats during midgestation causes fetoplacental growth restriction through apoptosis. Biol Reprod. 2006, 75: 940-947. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.053322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kobayashi K, Kubota T, Aso T, Hirata Y, Imai T, Marumo F: Immunoreactive adrenomedullin (AM) concentration in maternal plasma during human pregnancy and AM expression in placenta. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000, 142: 683-687. 10.1530/eje.0.1420683.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Montuenga LM, Martinez A, Miller MJ, Unsworth EJ, Cuttitta F: Expression of adrenomedullin and its receptor during embryogenesis suggests autocrine or paracrine modes of action. Endocrinology. 1997, 138: 440-451. 10.1210/en.138.1.440.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement