Skip to main content

MUC1: A multifunctional cell surface component of reproductive tissue epithelia


MUC1 is a large, transmembrane mucin glycoprotein expressed at the apical surface of a variety of reproductive tract epithelia. Functions attributed to MUC1 include those generally associated with mucins such as lubrication and hydration of cell surfaces as well as protection from microorganisms and degradative enzymes. In addition, MUC1 is an effective inhibitor of both cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions in both normal and malignant contexts. Moreover, a series of recent studies has shown that the highly conserved cytoplasmic tail of MUC1 interacts specifically with a series of important signal transducing molecules including β-catenin, Grb2 and erbB family members. MUC1 expression in normal epithelia can be quite dynamic, varying in response to steroid hormone or cytokine influences. Following malignant transformation, MUC1 often becomes highly overexpressed, loses its apical restriction, and displays aberrant glycosylation and altered mRNA splice variants. Regulation of MUC1 expression can occur at the transcriptional level. In addition, post-translational regulation of cell surface expression occurs via the activity of cell surface proteases or "sheddases" that release soluble forms of the large ectodomains. This review will briefly summarize studies of MUC1 expression and function in reproductive tissues with particular emphasis on the uterus. In addition, current knowledge of the mechanisms of MUC1 gene regulation, metabolic processing and potential signal transducing functions will be presented.

MUC1 structure and expression

The MUC1 gene encodes a type-I transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed on the apical surface of most simple epithelia, including mammary gland, female reproductive tract, lung, kidney, stomach, gall bladder, and pancreas as well as some non-epithelial cell types [reviewed in [1]]. The human MUC1 gene spans 4 to 7 kb and is comprised of 7 exons that can be alternatively spliced to form transcripts from 3.7 to 6.4 kb. The full-length protein contains three domains: short cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains that are highly conserved among species, and a large extracellular domain (Fig. 1). The extracellular domain in humans contains 20–125 tandem repeats of 20 amino acids enriched in serine, threonine, and proline residues. Due to these features, the tandem repeat domain has the potential for extensive O-glycosylation. The core protein has an estimated weight of 120–225 kDa, though the mature glycosylated form ranges from 250–500 kDa [reviewed in [1, 2]]. The proline residues and glycosylation give rise to a rigid, extended structure that protrudes 200–500 nm above the cell surface, much farther than the distance spanned by most cell-surface proteins, including syndecans and integrins (fig. 2). In addition, in most simple epithelia, including those of the uterus, mucins not only are abundant, but also are concentrated at the apical surface. Collectively, these observations are consistent with mucins functioning as a protective barrier with adhesion-modulating properties.

Figure 1

Protein structure and normal expression pattern of MUC1. Schematic diagram of the size and structure of the full-length MUC1 protein relative to the plasma membrane. The horizontal bar indicates the distance that most cell surface proteins extend into the pericellular space. The three major domains of MUC1 are indicated to the left: (1) an N-terminal, extracellular domain (ECTO); (2) a single, membrane spanning domain (TM); and (3) a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain (CT). A list of epithelial and non-epithelial human tissues that normally express MUC1 is indicated to the right.

Figure 2

Model of mucins and other cell surface glycoproteins/proteoglycans. The figure schematically portrays structures of four size classes of mucins as well as consensus structures for syndecans and integrins. All extracellular portions of these molecules are roughly drawn to scale. Blue squiggles represent O-linked oligosaccharides while red squiggles represent glycosaminoglycans. Integrins, syndecans and most other all surface receptors do not extend beyond 50 nm from the cell surface; however, with the exception of MUC13, mucins extend much farther due to the extende3d structures contributed by the praline-rich heavily O-glycosylated tandem repeat domains. MUC1 and MUC4 are the largest transmembrane mucins, extending >200 nm from the cell surface. The ectodomain structures of MUC16 and MUC17 are considerably shorter than those of MUC1 and MUC4, but still much larger than other surface glycoproteins. Soluble mucins, such as MUC2, 5AC, 5B and 19 are even larger, reading 500–100 nm in length.

While probably the best studied, MUC1 is just one example of a class of molecules collectively referred to as mucins. Mucins may be grouped as transmembrane or soluble (see Table 1). As noted above for MUC1, many of these mucins are physically very large molecules with extended structures due to the abundance of proline residues and high degree of glycosylation (see Fig. 2). Nonetheless, some are of comparable size to other cell surface proteins, e.g., MUC13 [3]. MUC1 and MUC4 have many similar features and proposed functions. Other recently described transmembrane mucins such as MUC16 and MUC17 also may share properties with MUC1 and MUC4, but not enough information is available to suggest their physiological function. This review will focus on studies of MUC1 as a prototype of large, transmembrane mucins in the context of uterine biology. As noted in Table 1, expression of many of the known mucins has not yet been examined in uterine tissues; only MUC1 and MUC4 have been carefully examined through the menstrual cycle and during early pregnancy.

Table 1 Mucin Expression in the Uterus

MUC1 Functions

Mucins have numerous functions in the glycocalyx. Their high degree of glycosylation provides lubrication, prevents dehydration, and offers protection from proteolysis. Microbial challenge is frequent in most mucous membranes, and mucins protect against attack by sterically inhibiting microbial access to the cell surface. Bacterial adhesins bind mucin carbohydrates at the cell surface [4, 5], a process that normally protects against infection. In addition, extended transmembrane mucins, such as MUC1 and MUC4, modulate cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions by steric hindrance [reviewed in [1, 2]]. In fact, overexpression of MUC1 in tumor cells is suggested to promote metastasis through disruption of these interactions [6, 7]. This activity is directly related to the number of tandem repeats in the ectodomains of MUC1 and MUC4 since reduction of these motifs alone makes these molecules ineffective inhibitors of cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions [8, 9].

In addition to mechanical functions, the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail has been shown to associate with β-catenin [10], as well as with other signaling molecules, e.g., Grb2/Sos [11], suggesting a potential role for MUC1 in cell signaling [reviewed in [12]]. In the mammary gland, MUC1 expression increases markedly during lactation along with increased MUC1:erbB1 interactions [13]. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail occurs in both intact MUC1 and chimeric molecules consisting of CD8 ectodomains and the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail [14, 15]. It is not clear if MUC1 phosphorylation or interactions with signal transducing proteins change in response to physiological stimuli. Activation of erbB1 with EGF induces tyrosine phosphorylation of the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail [13, 16] and activation of ERK 1/2 [13]. Moreover, EGF mediated activation of ERK 1/2 is drastically enhanced in the presence of high levels of MUC1 in the mouse mammary gland [13]. Thus, potential stimuli, including growth factors or cytokines directly or through activation of their receptors may affect MUC1 stability, localization at the cell surface, or phosphorylation state. Direct interactions with the MUC1 ectodomain, e.g., by microbes or selectins, also could conceivably trigger signaling events. In this regard, increased tyrosine phosphorylation of the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail is associated with cell-substratum adhesion [14]. Thus, MUC1, and perhaps other mucins, have the potential to function as receptors either alone or in cooperation with known signal transducing proteins.

Studies in tumor cells indicate that the amount and type of MUC1 expressed modulate immune responses to these cells. MUC1 is differentially glycosylated in many cancerous cells, exposing tumor-specific epitopes that may trigger an immune response [17, 18]; however, MUC1 also has been shown to protect cancer cells from immune cell attack [19, 20], indicating both immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive functions for MUC1. MUC1 and other mucins are abundantly expressed at the apical surface of luminal and glandular uterine epithelia [2124]. Muc1 (mouse nomenclature) null mice exhibit chronic infection and inflammation of the uterus as a result of increased infection by normal bacteria of the reproductive tract [25]. In vitro studies have shown that cells expressing a high level of MUC1 at the cell surface are refractory to blastocyst attachment, while removing MUC1 from the cell surface allows attachment [25, 26]. Taken together, these studies suggest that MUC1 plays a role in protecting the endometrium from microbial attack, but must be lost in order for embryo implantation to occur. Indeed, Muc1 expression in mice is lost throughout the uterine epithelia by day 4 of pregnancy when the uterus is receptive to blastocyst attachment [22, 27]. In contrast, rabbits display generally high Muc1 expression during the receptive phase although local loss of Muc1 is observed at implantation sites [23]. Similarly, MUC1 expression in humans is maximal during the implantation phase [21]. In vitro studies indicate that human blastocysts produce factors that lead to local MUC1 loss on monolayers of human uterine epithelia [28]. In contrast, recent studies indicate that human blastocysts display selectins on their cell surface and that complementary selectin ligands are found on the uterine surface during the receptive phase [29]. Uterine epithelial MUC1 carries selectin ligands throughout the cycle ([30], J. Julian, S. Fisher and D.D. Carson, unpublished observations); however, it is not clear if selectin ligands are found on most, or a minor subset of, MUC1 molecules. Nonetheless, it must be considered that MUC1 participates in selectin-dependent interactions in the uterus and, thus, may promote cell-cell interactions in some contexts.

Regulation of MUC1 expression

Appropriate tissue-specific expression and regulation of MUC1 was demonstrated in a MUC1 transgenic mouse created using 1.6 kb of 5' and 2.3 kb of 3' flanking sequence [31]. In vitro deletion analysis of the 1.6 kb proximal promoter region demonstrated that elements in the region from 400 bp to 600 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site are required for maximal promoter activity, and elements between -150 bp and -60 bp are required for tissue specificity [32, 33]. Several of the regulatory elements in the MUC1 5' flanking sequence have been functionally characterized (Fig. 3). The E box (E-MUC1) at -84/-72 is required for transcriptional repression in cells that do not normally express MUC1 [33]. The transcription factor Snail has been shown to bind this region to repress MUC1 transcription [34]. Two Sp1 sites (GC boxes) have been shown to be important for transcriptional activation in epithelial cells and repression in non-epithelial cells [33, 35, 36]. The Sp1 site at -99/-90 is required for cErbB2/Ras-mediated transcriptional repression [37], and this element overlaps the binding site of SpA, a transcriptional repressor that competes with Sp1 for binding [35]. A region from -531 to -517 was shown to be required for MUC1 transcriptional activation in human colon cancer cells in response to treatment with normal colon conditioned medium [38]. The interferon (IFN)-γ-mediated up-regulation of MUC1 expression in human mammary epithelial cells was shown to act through signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1α binding to the STAT binding site at -503/-495 [39, 40]. STAT3 is able to bind the STAT binding element in human mammary epithelial cells in response to interleukin (IL)-6 treatment [40]. The κB binding element at -589/-580 in the MUC1 promoter region is required for up-regulation of MUC1 expression in response to TNF-α treatment, and TNF-α and IFN-γ can synergize to stimulate MUC1 expression in human mammary epithelial cells [39].

Figure 3

The MUC1 proximal promoter. The 1.4 kb human MUC1 proximal promoter is sufficient for driving proper tissue-specific expression in a transgenic mouse model. Cis elements that have been shown to be important for MUC1 regulation include the two Sp1 sites, the κB site, a STAT binding element, and E-MUC1 (E box). The location of several potential progesterone response elements (PRE) also are shown.

Similar to its actions on MUC1 gene expression, TNFα, acting through NFκB activation, greatly stimulates MUC2 and MUC5AC gene activation in human lung epithelial cell lines [4144]. This activation proceeds via a Src-dependent, Ras-MEK1/2/ERK1/2-pp90srk pathway. MUC4 expression also is cytokine regulated, but in a different, intriguing fashion. TGFβ1 strongly inhibits MUC4 expression at the post-translational level of mucin processing [45]. Recent studies indicate that the TGFβ1 response is repressed by IFN-γ, an activator of the expression of other mucin genes. This response involves interplay between SMADs and STAT1 that appear to control activity of the MUC4 processing step [46]. It is not clear if the TGFβ1/SMAD system similarly regulates the expression of other mucins.

MUC1 expression is controlled by steroid hormones in the mammary gland and uterus [22, 28, 47]. Several putative progeterone and estrogen response elements have been identified in the human MUC1 promoter by sequence analysis [48, 49]. In both mice and humans, progesterone levels are maximal, relative to estrogen, at the implantation phase, but changes in MUC1 expression in response to steroid hormones is different in the two species. In mice, uterine Muc1 expression is greatly stimulated by estrogen. While progesterone alone has no effect, it strongly antagonizes estrogen-stimulated Muc1 expression [22, 27]. Experiments with antiestrogens and antiprogestins indicate that the actons of both hormones are mediated by nuclear receptors [22]. Nonetheless, direct regulation of the Muc1 promoter by ER-α or -β, or PR-A or -B, has not been demonstrable [50]. Conversely, endometrial MUC1 expression in humans is higher during the secretory phase, a progesterone-dominated portion of the cycle [21, 28]. The reason for these differences in hormonal responsiveness among species is not clear. Possibilities include species-specific differences in cis promoter elements and transcription factor/transcriptional coregulator contexts. Further studies are necessary to understand the molecular basis of steroid hormone regulation of MUC1 gene expression.

MUC1 Metabolism and Shedding

In mouse uterine epithelial cells, Muc1 is translated, glycosylated and moves to the cell surface with a median transit time of 142 min [51]. During this process, it is proteolytically cleaved at a site between the transmembrane and tandem repeat domains. In spite of this, the heterodimer remains tightly associated in an SDS-labile, but otherwise stable, interaction [5254]. After arrival at the cell surface, MUC1 may undergo several fates. One is recycling through the trans aspect of the Golgi apparatus ([55], a process that would lead to no net loss; however, Muc1's metabolic half life ranges from 12–16 hr ([51] and refs. within) demonstrating that mechanisms exist to degrade even these extremely biochemically resistant molecules. A second fate is endocytosis followed by degradation in an intracellular acidic compartment, presumably lysosomes [51]. The balance of Muc1 turnover probably is due to cell surface release or shedding (see below). Shedding results in separation of the cytoplasmic tail from the ectodomain in all cases studied, implicating a proteolytic event [51, 54, 56]; however, recent studies indicate that mutation of the site of intracellular metabolic cleavage inhibits MUC1 shedding, indicating that cleavage at this site is critical for subsequent cell surface release [57].

Soluble, presumably shed, MUC1 fragments are found in bodily fluids [58, 59] as well as uterine flushings from women during the receptive phase of the cycle [60]. Women who suffer recurrent spontaneous miscarriages have reduced levels of MUC1 in uterine flushings, suggesting that a defect in the MUC1 release system underlies some human fertility defects [60, 61]. These observations suggest that MUC1 proteolytic release occurs in vivo as well. Alternative mRNA splicing generates a secreted form of MUC1, MUC1/SEC, lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmic tail [62]. Transcripts for MUC1/SEC are detectable in human endometrium indicating that at least a portion of the soluble MUC1 found in uterine flushings is contributed by MUC1/SEC, rather than shedding [63].

Although the intracellular cleavage site 65 amino acids upstream of the MUC1 transmembrane domain has been identified, the protease mediating the metabolic cleavage has not [53]. As noted above, this site appears to be critical for MUC1 shedding, at least in certain cellular contexts [57]. Nonetheless, these results do not preclude an additional cleavage occurring at a later stage of processing. Thus, due to its extreme resistance to externally added proteases [64], it is unlikely that cell surface MUC1 release is mediated by the actions of an external protease [52, 64]. Various serine, cysteine and aspartic acid protease inhibitors do not inhibit Muc1 ecotodomain release [51], implicating the involvement of other protease classes. Others have suggested that release is catalyzed post-translationally by an endogenous proteolytic activity [56, 65].

Muc1 expression is elevated during the peri-implantation period in rabbits [23]; however, careful examination of implantation sites in vivo and in vitro reveals that Muc1 is lost solely at the site of embryo-uterine apposition [23]. Interestingly, elevated expression of the cell surface protease, ADAM 9, accompanies Muc1 loss at implantation sites in rabbits [66], implicating ADAM 9 in the implantation process in this species. Uterine MUC1 also appears to be elevated during the receptive phase in humans [21]. Although implantation sites have not been studied in humans, in vitro implantation models indicate that MUC1 is lost at the site of embryo attachment in humans as well [26, 28], suggesting that factors expressed on the blastocyst surface or released with limited diffusibility trigger MUC1 loss in rabbits and humans. These findings are consistent with an induced loss of MUC1 at the site of attachment, perhaps triggered by the blastocyst itself or a factor(s) produced by the blastocyst and mediated through activation of a uterine cell surface protease. Taken together, these observations led to the hypothesis that an endogenous protease(s) mediates constitutive and induced MUC1 release from the human uterine epithelial cell surface.

Examination of MUC1 shedding in the human uterine epithelial cell line, HES, demonstrated that this process was unaffected by a variety of synthetic and naturally occurring protease inhibitors; however, a subset of synthetic and one endogenous metalloprotease inhibitor blocked constitutive as well as phorbol ester-stimulated MUC1 shedding [67], implicating an ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease) as a MUC1 sheddase. PCR profiling identified a subset of catalytically active ADAMs including tumor necrosis-α converting enzyme (TACE)/ADAM17 present in HES cells as well as the receptive phase human endometrium. Cotransfection of MUC1 into wild-type as well as TACE/ADAM17-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts revealed that constitutive and phorbol ester-stimulated shedding was abolished in TACE/ADAM17-deficient cells. Furthermore, TACE/ADAM17 was identified in both lumenal and glandular epithelium in the receptive phase human endometrium implicating a role for this protease in MUC1 shedding in vivo. No information is yet available on whether endometrial TACE/ADAM17 expression or activation is modulated during the cycle in any species. Additional studies indicate that pervanadate-stimulated MUC1 shedding occurred even in TACE/ADAM17-deficient cells, demonstrating that additional sheddases are operative under certain circumstances (A. Thathiah and D.D. Carson, manuscript submitted). Thus, it is possible that multiple proteases contribute to MUC1 shedding. Alterations in the expression of activation of these enzymes may contribute to acute, localized MUC1 removal.


In many respects, MUC1 is a prototypical large, transmembrane mucin. In the uterus these glycoproteins are almost completely restricted to the uterine epithelium where they lubricate and maintain hydration of the cell surface as well as present major barriers to microbes and implanting blastocysts. In the latter case, it is critical that this barrier be removed to create embryonic access to the uterine epithelium. In many species, this appears to be accomplished by down-regulation of MUC1 gene expression. In this regard, progress has been made in understanding transcriptional regulation of MUC1 as well as other mucin genes. Nonetheless, more work needs to be done to understand the mechanisms underlying steroid hormone regulation of these genes. In other cases, MUC1 expression and function appears to be modulated by shedding. TACE/ADAM17 and MT1-MMP represent two enzymes likely to mediate MUC1 shedding in uterine epithelia. While MUC1 shedding provides a dynamic and rapid way of modulating cell surface MUC1 expression and function, many questions remain. In order to create blastocyst access to the epithelial surface, it is predicted that a large fraction of the apically-disposed MUC1 must be lost; however, so far we have found no individual factors that reduce the cellular complement of MUC1 by more than 5–10% (A. Thathiah, M. Brayman, N. Dharmaraj and D.D. Carson, unpublished observations). The receptive phase endometrial milieu is complex and influenced by factors of both maternal and embryonic origin. It is possible that a combination of factors synergize, potentially activating multiple sheddases, to clear MUC1 from the apical cell surface. Adressing this possibility will require careful examination of candidate factors alone and in combination. Sheddases also require activation to be functional and assays need to be developed to determine whether proteins not only are present, but also active during the transition to the receptive state. Since sheddases are likely to play important roles in regulating bioavailability of other important epithelial cell surface components, e.g., HB-EGF [68], developing a thorough understanding of the enzymes operative in the endometrium is likely to impact other aspects of our understanding of uterine physiology. Finally, the roles of mucins in uterine signal transduction are only starting to be appreciated. How mucins activate or function in intracellular signaling cascades and what factors modulate mucin participation in these events should be carefully studied in physiologically relevant contexts.


  1. 1.

    Gendler SJ, Spicer AP: Epithelial mucin genes. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995, 57: 607-634.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lagow E, DeSouza MM, Carson DD: Mammalian reproductive tract mucins. Hum Reprod Update. 1999, 5: 280-292.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Williams SJ, Wreschner DH, Tran M, Eyre HJ, Sutherland GR, McGuckin MA: Muc13, a novel human cell surface mucin expressed by epithelial and hemopoietic cells. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 18327-18336.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vimal DB, Khullar M, Gupta S, Ganguly NK: Intestinal mucins: the binding sites for Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Cell Biochem. 2000, 204: 107-117.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lillehoj EP, Kim BT, Kim KC: Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellin as an adhesin for Muc1 mucin. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002, 282: L751-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hilkens J, Ligtenberg MJ, Vos HL, Litvinov SV: Cell membrane-associated mucins and their adhesion-modulating property. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992, 17: 359-363.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wesseling J, van der Valk SW, Vos HL, Sonnenberg A, Hilkens J: Episialin (MUC1) overexpression inhibits integrin-mediated cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components. J Cell Biol. 1995, 129: 255-265.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wesseling J, van der Valk SW, Hilkens J: A mechanism for inhibition of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion by the membrane-associated mucin episialin/MUC1. Mol Biol Cell. 1996, 7: 565-577.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Komatsu M, Carraway CA, Fregien NL, Carraway KL: Reversible disruption of cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions by overexpression of sialomucin complex. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 33245-33254.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yamamoto M, Bharti A, Li Y, Kufe D: Interaction of the DF3/MUC1 breast carcinoma-associated antigen and beta-catenin in cell adhesion. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 12492-12494.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pandey P, Kharbanda S, Kufe D: Association of the DF3/MUC1 breast cancer antigen with Grb2 and the Sos/Ras exchange protein. Cancer Res. 1995, 55: 4000-4003.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gendler SJ: MUC1, the renaissance molecule. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2001, 6: 339-353.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schroeder JA, Thompson MC, Gardner MM, Gendler SJ: Transgenic MUC1 interacts with epidermal growth factor receptor and correlates with mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in the mouse mammary gland. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 13057-13064.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Quin RJ, McGuckin MA: Phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of the MUC1 mucin correlates with changes in cell-cell adhesion. Int J Cancer. 2000, 87: 499-506.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Meerzaman D, Shapiro PS, Kim KC: Involvement of the MAP kinase ERK2 in MUC1 mucin signaling. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001, 281: L86-91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li Y, Kuwahara H, Ren J, Wen G, Kufe D: The c-Src tyrosine kinase regulates signaling of the human DF3/MUC1 carcinoma-associated antigen with GSK3 beta and beta-catenin. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 6061-6064.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jerome KR, Barnd DL, Bendt KM, Boyer CM, Taylor-Papadimitriou J, McKenzie IF, Bast R. C., Jr., Finn OJ: Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes derived from patients with breast adenocarcinoma recognize an epitope present on the protein core of a mucin molecule preferentially expressed by malignant cells. Cancer Res. 1991, 51: 2908-2916.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Girling A, Bartkova J, Burchell J, Gendler S, Gillett C, Taylor-Papadimitriou J: A core protein epitope of the polymorphic epithelial mucin detected by the monoclonal antibody SM-3 is selectively exposed in a range of primary carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1989, 43: 1072-1076.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Agrawal B, Gendler SJ, Longenecker BM: The biological role of mucins in cellular interactions and immune regulation: prospects for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Med Today. 1998, 4: 397-403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhang K, Sikut R, Hansson GC: A MUC1 mucin secreted from a colon carcinoma cell line inhibits target cell lysis by natural killer cells. Cell Immunol. 1997, 176: 158-165.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hey NA, Graham RA, Seif MW, Aplin JD: The polymorphic epithelial mucin MUC1 in human endometrium is regulated with maximal expression in the implantation phase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994, 78: 337-342.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Surveyor GA, Gendler SJ, Pemberton L, Das SK, Chakraborty I, Julian J, Pimental RA, Wegner CC, Dey SK, Carson DD: Expression and steroid hormonal control of Muc-1 in the mouse uterus. Endocrinology. 1995, 136: 3639-3647.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hoffman LH, Olson GE, Carson DD, Chilton BS: Progesterone and implanting blastocysts regulate Muc1 expression in rabbit uterine epithelium. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 266-271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hild-Petito S, Fazleabas AT, Julian J, Carson DD: Mucin (Muc-1) expression is differentially regulated in uterine luminal and glandular epithelia of the baboon (Papio anubis). Biol Reprod. 1996, 54: 939-947.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    DeSouza MM, Surveyor GA, Price RE, Julian J, Kardon R, Zhou X, Gendler S, Hilkens J, Carson DD: MUC1/episialin: a critical barrier in the female reproductive tract. J Reprod Immunol. 1999, 45: 127-158.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chervenak JL, Illsley NP: Episialin acts as an antiadhesive factor in an in vitro model of human endometrial-blastocyst attachment. Biol Reprod. 2000, 63: 294-300.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Braga Vania M. M., Gendler Sandra J.: Modulation of Muc-1 mucin expression in the mouse uterus during the estrus cycle, early pregnancy and placentation. Journal of Cell Science. 1993, 105: 397-405.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Meseguer M, Aplin JD, Caballero-Campo P, O'Connor JE, Martin JC, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C: Human endometrial mucin MUC1 is up-regulated by progesterone and down- regulated in vitro by the human blastocyst. Biol Reprod. 2001, 64: 590-601.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Genbacev OD, Prakobphol A, Foulk RA, Krtolica AR, Ilic D, Singer MS, Yang ZQ, Kiessling LL, Rosen SD, Fisher SJ: Trophoblast L-selectin-mediated adhesion at the maternal-fetal interface. Science. 2003, 299: 405-408.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hey NA, Aplin JD: Sialyl-Lewis x and Sialyl-Lewis a are associated with MUC1 in human endometrium. Glycoconj J. 1996, 13: 769-779.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Peat N, Gendler SJ, Lalani N, Duhig T, Taylor-Papadimitriou J: Tissue-specific expression of a human polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC1) in transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 1992, 52: 1954-1960.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Abe M, Kufe D: Characterization of cis-acting elements regulating transcription of the human DF3 breast carcinoma-associated antigen (MUC1) gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 282-286.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kovarik A, Peat N, Wilson D, Gendler SJ, Taylor-Papadimitriou J: Analysis of the tissue-specific promoter of the MUC1 gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1993, 268: 9917-9926.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Guarita Sandra, Puig Isabel, Franci Clara, Garrido Marta, Dominguez David, Batlle Eduard, Sancho Elena, Dedhar Shoukat, Herreros Antonio Garcia de, Baulida Josep: Snail induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in tumor cells is accompanied by MUC1 repression and ZEB1 expression. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002, 277: 39209-39216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kovarik A, Lu PJ, Peat N, Morris J, Taylor-Papadimitriou J: Two GC boxes (Sp1 sites) are involved in regulation of the activity of the epithelium-specific MUC1 promoter. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 18140-18147.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Morris Joanna R., Taylor-Papadimitriou Joyce: The Sp1 transcription factor regulates cell type-specific transcription of MUC1. DNA and Cell Biology. 2001, 20: 133-139.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Scibetta AG, Albanese I, Morris J, Cooper L, Downward J, Rowe PP, Taylor-Papadimitriou J: Regulation of MUC1 expression in human mammary cell lines by the c-ErbB2 and ras signaling pathways. DNA Cell Biol. 2001, 20: 265-274.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Shirotani K, Taylor-Papadimitriou J, Gendler SJ, Irimura T: Transcriptional regulation of the MUC1 mucin gene in colon carcinoma cells by a soluble factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994, 269: 15030-15035.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lagow Errin L., Carson Daniel D.: Synergistic stimulation of MUC1 expression in normal breast epithelia and breast cancer cells by interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2002, 86: 759-772.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gaemers Ingrid C., Vors Hans L., Volders Haukeline H., van der Valk Sylvia W., Hilkens John: A STAT-responsive element in the promoter of the episialin/MUC1 gene is involved in its overexpression in carcinoma cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001, 276: 6191-6199.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li JD: Exploitation of host epithelial signaling networks by respiratory bacterial pathogens. J Pharmacol Sci. 2003, 91: 1-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zen Y, Harada K, Sasaki M, Tsuneyama K, Katayanagi K, Yamamoto Y, Nakanuma Y: Lipopolysaccharide induces overexpression of MUC2 and MUC5AC in cultured biliary epithelial cells: possible key phenomenon of hepatolithiasis. Am J Pathol. 2002, 161: 1475-1484.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Van Seuningen I, Pigny P, Perrais M, Porchet N, Aubert JP: Transcriptional regulation of the 11p15 mucin genes. Towards new biological tools in human therapy, in inflammatory diseases and cancer?. Front Biosci. 2001, 6: D1216-34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Perrais M, Pigny P, Copin MC, Aubert JP, Van Seuningen I: Induction of MUC2 and MUC5AC mucins by factors of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family is mediated by EGF receptor/Ras/Raf/extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade and Sp1. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 32258-32267.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Price-Schiavi SA, Zhu X, Aquinin R, Carraway KL: Sialomucin complex (rat Muc4) is regulated by transforming growth factor beta in mammary gland by a novel post-translational mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 17800-17807.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Soto P, Price-Schiavi SA, Carraway KL: SMAD2 and SMAD7 involvement in the post-translational regulation of Muc4 via the transforming growth factor-beta and interferon-gamma pathways in rat mammary epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 20338-20344.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Braga VMM, Pemberton LF, Duhig T, Gendler SJ: Spatial and temporal expression of an epithelial mucin, MUC1, during mouse development. Development. 1992, 115: 427-437.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zaretsky JZ, Sarid R, Aylon Y, Mittelman LA, Wreschner DH, Keydar I: Analysis of the promoter of the MUC1 gene overexpressed in breast cancer. FEBS Lett. 1999, 461: 189-195.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Schug Jonathan, Overton G. Christian: TESS: Transcription Element Search Software on the WWW. 1997, Philadelphia, PA, Computational Biology and Informatics Laboratory,School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Technical Report CBIL-TR-1997-1001-v0.0

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zhou X, DeSouza MM, Julian J, Gendler SJ, Carson DD: Estrogen receptor does not directly regulate the murine Muc-1 promoter. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998, 143: 65-78.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pimental R. A., et al.: Synthesis and intracellular trafficking of Muc1 and mucins by polarized mouse uterine epithelial cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996, 271: 28128-28137.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ligtenberg MJ, Kruijshaar L, Buijs F, van Meijer M, Litvinov SV, Hilkens J: Cell-associated episialin is a complex containing two proteins derived from a common precursor. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 6171-6177.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Parry S, Silverman HS, McDermott K, Willis A, Hollingsworth MA, Harris A: Identification of MUC1 proteolytic cleavage sites in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 283: 715-720.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Julian J, Carson DD: Formation of MUC1 metabolic complex is conserved in tumor-derived and normal epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 293: 1183-1190.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Litvinov SV, Hilkens J: The epithelial sialomucin, episialin, is sialylated during recycling. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 21364-21371.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Boshell M, Lalani EN, Pemberton L, Burchell J, Gendler S, Taylor-Papadimitriou J: The product of the human MUC1 gene when secreted by mouse cells transfected with the full-length cDNA lacks the cytoplasmic tail. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992, 185: 1-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lillehoj EP, Han F, Kim KC: Mutagenesis of a Gly-Ser cleavage site in MUC1 inhibits ectodomain shedding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 307: 743-749.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Treon SP, Maimonis P, Bua D, Young G, Raje N, Mollick J, Chauhan D, Tai YT, Hideshima T, Shima Y, Hilgers J, von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Belch AR, Pilarski LM, Anderson KC: Elevated soluble MUC1 levels and decreased anti-MUC1 antibody levels in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2000, 96: 3147-3153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zhang K, Baeckstrom D, Brevinge H, Hansson GC: Secreted MUC1 mucins lacking their cytoplasmic part and carrying sialyl-Lewis a and x epitopes from a tumor cell line and sera of colon carcinoma patients can inhibit HL-60 leukocyte adhesion to E-selectin-expressing endothelial cells. J Cell Biochem. 1996, 60: 538-549.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Hey NA, Li TC, Devine PL, Graham RA, Saravelos H, Aplin JD: MUC1 in secretory phase endometrium: expression in precisely dated biopsies and flushings from normal and recurrent miscarriage patients. Hum Reprod. 1995, 10: 2655-2662.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Aplin JD, Spanswick C, Behzad F, Kimber SJ, Vicovac L: Integrins beta 5, beta 3 and alpha v are apically distributed in endometrial epithelium. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996, 2: 527-534.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Baruch A, Hartmann M, Yoeli M, Adereth Y, Greenstein S, Stadler Y, Skornik Y, Zaretsky J, Smorodinsky NI, Keydar I, Wreschner DH: The breast cancer-associated MUC1 gene generates both a receptor and its cognate binding protein. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 1552-1561.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hey NA, Meseguer M, Simon C, Smorodinsky NI, Wreschner DH, Ortiz ME, Aplin JD: Transmembrane and truncated (SEC) isoforms of MUC1 in the human endometrium and Fallopian tube. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003, 1: 2-

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jentoft N: Why are proteins O-glycosylated?. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990, 15: 291-294.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Patton S, Gendler SJ, Spicer AP: The epithelial mucin, MUC1, of milk, mammary gland and other tissues. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995, 1241: 407-423.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Olson GE, Winfrey VP, Matrisian PE, NagDas SK, Hoffman LH: Blastocyst-dependent upregulation of metalloproteinase/disintegrin MDC9 expression in rabbit endometrium. Cell Tissue Res. 1998, 293: 489-498.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Thathiah A, Carson DD: Mucins and blastocyst attachment. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2002, 3: 87-96.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Sunnarborg SW, Hinkle CL, Stevenson M, Russell WE, Raska CS, Peschon JJ, Castner BJ, Gerhart MJ, Paxton RJ, Black RA, Lee DC: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme (TACE) regulates epidermal growth factor receptor ligand availability. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 12838-12845.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Gipson IK, Ho SB, Spurr-Michaud SJ, Tisdale AS, Zhan Q, Torlakovic E, Pudney J, Anderson DJ, Toribara NW, Hill J. A., 3rd: Mucin genes expressed by human female reproductive tract epithelia. Biol Reprod. 1997, 56: 999-1011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    D'Cruz OJ, Dunn TS, Pichan P, Hass G. G., Jr., Sachdev GP: Antigenic cross-reactivity of human tracheal mucin with human sperm and trophoblasts correlates with the expression of mucin 8 gene messenger ribonucleic acid in reproductive tract tissues. Fertil Steril. 1996, 66: 316-326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors appreciate the careful reading of this manuscript, critical comments and discussions with Neeraja Dharmaraj, JoAnne Julian and Dr. Mary Farach-Carson. We thank Ms. Sharron Kingston and Mrs. Margie Barrett for secretarial and graphics assistance, respectively. We acknowledge the following grant support during the preparation of this manuscript: NIH grant HD29963 and DOD grant DAMD17-00-1-0525 to D.D.C. and NSF IGERT Program DGE0221651.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel D Carson.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brayman, M., Thathiah, A. & Carson, D.D. MUC1: A multifunctional cell surface component of reproductive tissue epithelia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2, 4 (2004).

Download citation


  • Human Mammary Epithelial Cell
  • MUC1 Expression
  • Uterine Epithelium
  • Receptive Phase
  • Selectin Ligand