Skip to main content

Table 1 Network meta-analysis for clinical pregnancy comparing diverse uterine infusion strategies

From: Uterine infusion strategies for infertile patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Groups/pregnant outcomes

DEX

ECS

G-CSF

G-CSF + AXaIUsc

GH

HCG

PBMC

PRP

PRP + G-CSF

PRP + G-CSFsc

Placebo

Control

2.76 (1.16, 5.81)

1.36 (0.64, 2.64)

2.58 (1.90, 3.43)

3.34 (1.38, 8.19)

2.80 (1.14, 6.60)

2.27 (1.76, 3.01)

3.03 (2.42, 4.07)

3.07 (2.30, 3.88)

2.90 (1.19, 10.06)

1.51 (0.41, 4.59)

1.59 (1.18, 2.06)

DEX

 

0.46 (0.17, 1.47)

0.88 (0.41, 2.35)

1.16 (0.39, 4.34)

0.95 (0.32, 3.44)

0.83 (0.37, 2.07)

1.11 (0.52, 2.80)

1.09 (0.49, 2.67)

1.09 (0.31, 5.09)

0.49 (0.13, 2.06)

0.56 (0.25, 1.43)

ECS

  

1.89 (0.90, 4.28)

2.46 (0.86, 7.94)

2.17 (0.66, 6.45)

1.67 (0.83, 3.81)

2.22 (1.14, 5.23)

2.40 (1.07, 4.94)

2.22 (0.74, 9.51)

1.08 (0.25, 4.05)

1.17 (0.56, 2.55)

G-CSF

   

1.31 (0.54, 3.18)

1.11 (0.46, 2.55)

0.89 (0.66, 1.29)

1.19 (0.89, 1.75)

1.23 (0.79, 1.71)

1.16 (0.45, 3.97)

0.60 (0.15, 1.99)

0.62 (0.46, 0.85)

G-CSF + AXaIUsc

    

0.87 (0.25, 2.65)

0.64 (0.28, 1.72)

0.89 (0.38, 2.33)

0.94 (0.35, 2.24)

0.87 (0.25, 3.84)

0.45 (0.09, 1.98)

0.48 (0.19, 1.15)

GH

     

0.79 (0.35, 2.09)

1.08 (0.47, 2.85)

1.13 (0.43, 2.68)

1.05 (0.33, 4.68)

0.51 (0.10, 2.40)

0.56 (0.23, 1.38)

HCG

      

1.36 (1.00, 1.89)

1.35 (0.88, 1.98)

1.26 (0.51, 4.43)

0.66 (0.17, 2.04)

0.69 (0.51, 0.89)

PBMC

       

1.00 (0.67, 1.36)

0.95 (0.37, 3.27)

0.50 (0.12, 1.54)

0.52 (0.37, 0.67)

PRP

        

0.96 (0.36, 3.47)

0.44 (0.13, 1.54)

0.49 (0.37, 0.76)

PRP + G-CSF

         

0.50 (0.07, 2.02)

0.53 (0.15, 1.37)

PRP + G-CSFsc

          

1.06 (0.32, 3.93)