Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included randomized control trials

From: Outpatient hysteroscopy impact on subsequent assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis in patients with normal transvaginal sonography or hysterosalpingography images

Author, publication year

Study area

Main inclusion criteria

Main exclusion criteria

Intervention

Control

Live birth rate

(HSC/Control)

Clinical pregnancy rate

(HSC/Control)

Conclusion

Demirol et al. (2004)

Single center in Turkey

≥ 2 previous implantation failure

 

Outpatient HSC (N = 210)

Immediate IVF (N = 211)

NA

32.1%/21.5%

HSC improves PR.

Raju et al. (2006)

Single clinic in India

≥ 2 previous implantation failure

 

Outpatient HSC (N = 265)

Immediate IVF (N = 255)

28.5%/16.8%

43.1%/26.3%

HSC improves LBR and PR.

Shawki et al. (2012)

Single center in Egypt

For first or further ICSI

 

Outpatient HSC (N = 105)

Immediate IVF (N = 110)

37.8%/28.0%

44.4%/30.0%

HSC improves PR but does not improve LBR.

Elsetohy et al. (2015)

Single center in Egypt

For first ICSI

Recurrent miscarriage

Outpatient HSC (N = 97)

Immediate IVF (N = 96)

59.8%/34.4%

70.1%/45.8%

HSC improves LBR and PR.

Alleyassin et al. (2015)

Single center in Iran

For first ICSI

Recurrent miscarriage

Outpatient HSC (N = 110)

Immediate IVF (N = 110)

NA

48.2%/38.2%

HSC improves PR.

Smit et al. (2016)

Multicenter in Netherlands

For first IVF or ICSI

≥ 2 miscarriages

Outpatient HSC (N = 369)

Immediate IVF (N = 373)

54.5%/52.3%

NA

HSC does not improve LBR.

El-Toukhy et al. (2016)

Multicenter in UK, Belgium, Italy, Czech Republic

Age < 38 y/o

2–4 times previous implantation failure

BMI > 35 kg/m²

≥ 37 y/o with < 8 oocytes retrieved previously

Outpatient HSC (N = 350)

Immediate IVF (N = 352)

31.6%/33.1%

37.9%/37.9%

HSC does not improve LBR or PR.

Abid et al. (2021)

Single center in Tunisia

Age < 40 y/o

BMI ≤ 30 kg/m²

For first IVF

 

Outpatient HSC (N = 84)

Immediate IVF (N = 87)

25.0%/19.3%

32.4%/28.9%

HSC does not improve LBR or PR.

Pounikar et al. (2022)

Two centers in India

Age < 45 y/o

≥ 1 previous implantation failure

First time IVF

Outpatient HSC (N = 90)

Immediate IVF (N = 90)

NA

30.0%/23.3%

HSC improves PR.

Ghasemi et al. (2022)

Single center in Iran

Age ≤ 40 year

For first IVF

≥ 3 miscarriage

Outpatient HSC and irritation of uterine cavity (N = 109)

Immediate IVF (N = 119)

57.8%/47.9%

63.3%/58.0%

HSC improves cumulative LBR.

  1. HSC, hysteroscopy; PR, clinical pregnancy rate; LBR, live birth rate; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization