Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of endometrial receptivity of 3D power Doppler indices on the day of endometrial transformation and the day before embryo transfer between pregnant and non-pregnant patients

From: Pregnancy prediction via ultrasound-detected endometrial blood for hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer: a prospective observational study

Parameter

endometrial transformation day

P-value

the day before embryo transfer

P-value

Pregnant

Non-pregnant group

Pregnant

Non-pregnant

No. of patients

174

116

——

174

116

——

EMT (mm)

9.0 (8.0 − 11.0)

9.0 (8.0 − 10.5)

0.878

9.0 (8.0 − 11.0)

9.0 (8.0 − 10.5)

0.458

EMP (n,%)

  

0.518

  

0.713

A

113 (64.9)

71(61.2)

 

20 (11.5)

15 (12.9)

 

N-A

61 (35.1)

45 (38.8)

 

154 (88.5)

101 (87.1)

 

FEC ,n

3.0 (2.0 − 4.0)

2.0 (2.0 − 3.0)

0.490

3.0 (1.0 − 4.0)

2.75 (1.0 − 4.0)

0.446

DEC (n,%)

  

0.212

  

0.282

two-way

132 (78.6)

82 (73.9)

 

118 (88.7)

76 (82.6)

 

forward

21(12.5)

22 (19.8)

 

9 (6.8)

12 (13.0)

 

reverse

15 (8.9)

7 (6.3)

 

6 (4.5)

4(4.3)

 

EMBLP (n,%)

  

0.574

  

0.607

Type I

27 (15.5)

19 (16.4)

 

32 (18.4)

23(19.8)

 

Type II

78 (44.8)

58 (50.0)

 

75 (43.1)

55 (47.4)

 

Type III

69 (39.7)

39 (33.6)

 

67(38.5)

38 (32.8)

 

EMBLB (n,%)

  

0.009

  

0.001

<5

84 (48.3)(37.62%)

74 (63.8)

 

59(33.9)

71 (61.2)

 

≥5

90 (51.7)

42 (36.2)

 

115 (66.1)

45 (38.8)

 

EV (cm3)

2.87(2.17 − 3.80)

2.92 (2.30 − 3.74)

0.8862

3.09 (2.32 − 4.19)

3.11 (2.36 − 3.96)

0.880

  1. Forward: Cervico-to-fundal movement. Reverse: fundal-to-cervical movement. Abbreviations: EMT endometrial thickness; EMP endometrial pattern; FEC frequency of endometrial contraction; DEC direction of endometrial contraction; EMBLP endometrial blood flow pattern; EMBLB endometrial blood flow branches; EV endometrial volume