Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons of outcomes between GC and SU in men with normal and poor sperm parameters

From: Cumulative live birth rates after IVF/ICSI cycles with sperm prepared by density gradient centrifugation vs. swim-up: a retrospective study using a propensity score-matching analysis

Outcomes

Normal

Poor

No. of cycles

 DGC

526

193

 SU

611

118

Recovery rate, %

− 0.043 (− 0.089–0.002)a

0.025 (− 0.009–0.058)a

PR after preparation, %

−0.005 (− 0.014–0.003)a

1.858 (− 0.543–4.260)a

Fertilization rate, %

0.003 (− 0.037–0.043)a

0.074 (0.008–0.140)a

Good-quality embryo rate, %

0.011 (−0.062–0.085)a

0.028 (− 0.052–0.108)a

Blastocyst formation rate, %

−0.013 (− 0.101–0.074)a

0.010 (− 0.089–0.110)a

cLBR, % (n/n)

0.953 (0.644–1.411)b

1.539 (0.825–2.873)b

LBR per transfer, % (n/n)

1.114 (0.904–1.373)b

0.910 (0.575–1.442)b

  1. DGC Density gradient centrifugation, SU Swim-up, PR Progressive motility rate, cLBR Cumulative live birth rate
  2. aAdjusted β (95%CI), DGC vs. SU
  3. bAdjusted OR (95%CI), DGC vs. SU