Skip to main content

Table 4 Hormone and cytokine concentrations in FF between the two groups

From: Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations

 

Mild group

COS group

P value

AMH (ng/ml)

1.05 ± 0.51

1.54 ± 1.02

0.095

FSH (IU/L)

4.76 ± 1.55

9.80 ± 3.27

 < 0.001a

E2 (ng/ml)

394.97 ± 262.84

325.67 ± 169.20

0.390

LH (IU/L)

6.80 ± 4.65

1.02 ± 0.99

 < 0.001a

PRL (ng/ml)

33.34 ± 18.79

58.49 ± 29.64

0.007a

T (ng/ml)

45.59 ± 21.03

5.47 ± 2.19

 < 0.001a

P (μg/ml)

37.64 ± 21.95

79.58 ± 21.41

 < 0.001a

TGF-β2 (pg/ml)

21.21 ± 10.51

11.89 ± 8.21

0.014 a

GDF-9 (pg/ml)

61.22 ± 17.62

194.90 ± 56.47

 < 0.001a

BMP-15 (pg/ml)

42.60 ± 7.01

41.67 ± 11.18

0.777

  1. Values expressed as means ± SD. AMH anti-müllerian hormone, FSH follicle stimulating hormone, E2 estradiol, LH luteinizing hormone, PRL prolactin, T testosterone, P progesterone, TGF-β2 transforming growth factor-β2, GDF-9 growth differentiation factor-9, BMP-15 bone morphogenetic protein-15
  2. aResults are significantly different between the two groups