From: Air pollution from natural and anthropic sources and male fertility
Source | Location | Period | Study population | Age of men | Type of study | Exposure (range min-max) | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environmental exposure | |||||||
âSanti, et al. 2016 [25] | Italy, Modena | Nov 2014 to Feb 2015 | 406 men from the Clinical Pathology of the Nuovo Ospedale Civile Sant Agostino Estense (NOCSAE) | 32.3â±â5.2 | Retrospective cohort study | PM10 (4â155 Όg/m3) | Volume, concentration (Ăâ106/mL), total sperm number, typical/atypical forms (%),progressive motility (%), non-progressive motility (%), total motility (%), leucocytes |
PM2.5 (1â101Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âWu, et al. 2016 [27] | China, Wuhan | March 2013 to Dec 2015 | 1759 men, partners of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology | 34.4â±â5.4 | Retrospective cohort study | PM10 (67.2â197 Όg/m3) | Concentration (Ăâ106/mL), sperm count, total motility (%), progressive motility (%), |
PM2,5 (27.3â172.4Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
Radwan, et al. 2016 [23] | Poland, Lodz | Jan 2008 to Apr 2011 | 327 men from infertility clinic | 32.3â±â4.4 | Cross-sectional | PM10 (11.78â120.5 Όg/m3) | Concentration (Ăâ106/mL), motility (%), sperm with abnormal morphology (%), DFI(%), HDS(%), CASA parameters: VSL, VCL, LIN; FSH, E2, T |
PM2.5 (7.99â93.89Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
SO2 (9.12â167.9Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
CO (0.15â1.85Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
NOx (2.17â215.14Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âJurewicz, et al. 2015 [34] | Poland, Lodz | â | 212 men from infertility clinic | 22â57 | Cross-sectional | PM10 (11.59â122.8Â ÎŒg/m3) | Sperm aneuploidy, sperm concentration (Ăâ106/mL), total motility (%), abnormal morphology (%) |
32.25â±â5.72 | PM2,5 (7.99â95.22 Όg/m3) | ||||||
O3 (12.33â79.75Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
SO2 (10.11â160.90Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
CO (0.17â1.79Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
NOx (2.32â218.30Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âRadwan, et al. 2015 [35] | Poland, Lodz | Jan 2008 to Apr 2011 | 181 men from infertility clinic | 32.1â±â4.6 | Cross-sectional | 1 PAH metabolites in urine 1-OHP (0.04â2.03 Όg/g creat) | Sperm aneuploidy, sperm concentration (Ăâ106/mL), total motility (%), normal sperm morphology (%), |
âZhou, et al. 2014 [21] | China, Chongqing | 2007 | 1346 men from family planning institutions | 20â40 | Cross-sectional | PM10 (66â160.5Â ÎŒg/m3) | Volume, concentration (Ăâ106/mL), progressive motility (%), total motility, morphology (normal forms %), CASA sperm motility parameters (VCL, VSL, VAP, BCF, ALH, LIN, STR) |
SO2 (31-101Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
NO2 (19.5â53.5Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âJurewicz, et al. 2013 [24] | Poland, Lodz | â | 277 men from infertility clinic | 32â±â4.6 | Cross-sectional | 1 PAH metabolite in urine 1-OHP (0.02â2.03 Όg/g creat) | Volume, concentration (Ăâ106/mL), motility (%), atypical sperm (%),static sperm (%), CASA parameters: VAP, VSL, VCL, BCF, ALH, DFI (%) |
âSong, et al. 2013 [22] | China, Pearl River Delta | Jul 2010 to Aug 2011 | 53 men from infertility clinic | Â | Cross-sectional | 16 PAHs in blood | Concentration (Ăâ106/mL), volume, motility (grade A, grade B, grade C) |
âHan, et al. 2011 [31] | China, Chongqing | Dec 2007 | 232 men from Chongqing Family Planning Research Institute | 31.89â±â5.53 | Cross-sectional | 4 PAH metabolites in urine | Apoptotic marker (Annexin Vâ/PIâ spermatozoa %, Annexin V+/PIâ spermatozoa %, PI+ spermatozoa %, comet parameters (tail%, tail length, TDM) |
1-OHP (ÎŒg/g creatinine) | |||||||
9-OHPh (ÎŒg/g creatinine) | |||||||
2-OHFIu (ÎŒg/g creatinine) | |||||||
2-OHNa (ÎŒg/g creatinine) | |||||||
âHammoud, et al. 2010 [20] | USA, Salt Lake City | 2002 to 2007 | 1699 semen analyses and 877 inseminations | 32.8â±â6.57 | Ecological study | PM2.5 (5-24 Όg/m3) | Motility, concentration (Ă106/mL), morphology (normal forms %) |
âHansen, et al. 2010 [19] | USA, Wake County, Shelby County and Galveston County | 2002 to 2004 | 228 men, partners of pregnant women | 18â40 | Cross-sectional | O3 (2â83.2Â ppb) | Concentration (Ăâ106/mL), count, morphology (normal forms %), abnormal morphology (%), abnormal head (%), abnormal midsection (%), abnormal tail (%), cytoplasmic droplets (%), CMA (%), DFI (%) |
PM2.5 (2.1â62.7Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âXia, et al. 2009a [28] | China, Nanjing | March 2004 to Jul 2007 | 513 infertile men and 273 fertile men as controls | 28.65â±â4.51 for infertile males and 29.32â±â4.51 for controls | Cross-sectional | 4 PAH metabolites in urine | Volume, concentration (Ă106/mL), sperm number per ejaculum, sperm motility |
1-N (ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
2-N(ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
1-OHP (ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
2-OHF(ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
âXia, et al. 2009b [29] | China, Nanjing | March 2004 to Jul 2007 | 542 men | No information -based on abstract | Cross-sectional | 4 PAH metabolites in urine | Volume, concentration (Ăâ106/mL), sperm number per ejaculum, sperm motility |
1-N (ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
2-N(ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
1-OHP (ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
2-OHF(ÎŒg/g creat) | |||||||
âRubes, et al. 2007 [32] | Czech, Teplice | Sep 1995 to Sep 1997 | 36 men | 19â21 | Longitudinal study | SO2 (ÎŒg/m3) | %DFI, GSTM1 genotype |
NOx (ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
PM10 (16.9â76.3Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
PAH (21.4â221.9Â ng/m3) | |||||||
âSokol, et al. 2006 [18] | USA, Los Angeles | Jan 1996 to Dec 1998 | 48 sperm donors from sperm donor bank | 19â35 mean 25.3â±â4.7 | Retrospective cohort study | O3 (1.69â47.51 ppb) | Concentration (Ă106/mL), motility (Ă106) |
NO2 (9.04â79.80Â ppb) | |||||||
CO (0.37â3.86Â ppm) | |||||||
PM10 (6.84â101.88Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âRubes, et al. 2005 [26] | Czech, Teplice | Sep 1995 to Sep 1997 | 36 men | 19â21 | Prospective cohort study | SO2 (ÎŒg/m3) | Count, concentration (Ă106/mL), volume, motility (%), normal sperm head morphology (%), normal morphology (%), straight line velocity, curvilinear velocity, linearity, %DFI |
NOx (ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
PM10 (ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
PAH (ng/m3) | |||||||
âSelevan, et al. 2000 [17] | Czech, Teplice, Prachatice | 1993 to 1994 | 408 men from Hygiene Station | 18 | Prospective cohort study | PM10 (3.1â832.0Â ÎŒg/m3) | Semen volume, concentration (Ă106/mL), total count, motility (%), total progressive, normal morphology (%), normal heads (%), VSL, VCL, LIN, sperm chromatin structure |
SO2 (1â697.9Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
CO (0â5.50Â mg/m3) | |||||||
NOx (0â367.20Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âRobbins, et al. 1999 [33] | Czech, Teplice, Prachatice | Â | Subset of 32 men | No information -based on abstract | Prospective cohort study | No information-based on abstract | Sperm aneuploidy |
Occupational exposure | |||||||
âCalogero, et al. 2011 [37] | Italy | 1.) 15June to 15July 2.) 1 to 31Jan | 36 men working at motorway tollgates; 32 unexposed men | 28â47 37.1â±â5.5 | Cross-sectional | NOx (ÎŒg/m3) | LH, FSH, T, sperm concentration (Ă106/mL), total count, total motility (%), progressive motility (%), normal forms (%), sperm chromatin integrity, DFI (%) |
SOx (ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
âBoggia, et al. 2009 [38] | Italy | 2000 to 2004 | 307 men working at motorway | 23â57 mean 37.16 | Cross-sectional | NO2 (ÎŒg/m3) | FSH, LH, T, sperm count, motility (%), morphology, |
âGuven, et al. 2008 [36] | Turkey | â | 38 men working at motorway and 35 men working at office as a control group | 35.2â±â6.4 (study group) and 33.7â±â6.7 (control group) | Cross-sectional | Traffic pollutants mainly the diesel | Concentration (Ă106/mL), motility, morphology |
âDe Rosa, et al. 2003 [39] | Italy | Jan2000 to Jan2002 | 85 men working at motorway and 85 control men randomly selected; | 38.6â±â0.8 (study group) and 39.6â±â0.7 (control group) | Cross-sectional | CO (9-27 mg/m3) | FSH, LH, T, sperm count, volume, motility, morphology, sperm membrane function, forward progression, sperm kinetics: VSL, VCL, LIN, ALH, |
NO (58â398Â mg/m3) | |||||||
SO (9â27Â ÎŒg/m3) | |||||||
Pb (0.9â4.2Â ÎŒg/m3) |