Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality assessment of prospective cohort studies

From: Metabolic/endocrine disorders in survivors of childhood-onset and cranial radiotherapy- treated ALL/NHL: a meta-analysis

Author

Prospective design

Clear definition of study population

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Elitzur, et al. 2017

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Bayram et al. 2017

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Steffens et al. 2008

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Alves et al. 2004

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ghassemi et al. 2016

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Vilela et al. 2013

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Chow et al. 2013

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Hata et al. 2001

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Krawczuk-Rybak et al. 2019

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Piette et al. 2020

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cicognani et al. 1992

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Shimazaki et al. 2020

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Adan et al. 2001

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Costin et al. 1988

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Siimes et al. 1993

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. (1) if the study design was proper or not; (2) was measurement of each outcome indicator stable or not; (3) was CRT plus group and non-CRT group comparable between each other; (4) was there any clear definition of outcome event; (5) was follow-up duration clearly given