Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality assessment of the included cross-sectional studies

From: Effects of hyperandrogenism on metabolic abnormalities in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis

Included studies

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Hosseinpanah 2014 [6]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Kim 2014 [7]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Lerchbaum 2014 [8]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Livadas 2014 [9]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Sung 2014 [10]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Tehrani 2014 [11]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Ates 2013 [12]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Di Sarra 2013 [13]

Yes

Yes

No

Unclear

Unclear

No

No

No

No

Yes

Zhu 2013 [14]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Gluszak 2012 [15]

No

Yes

No

Unclear

Unclear

No

No

No

No

Yes

Jones 2012 [16]

No

Yes

No

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Li 2012 [17]

No

Yes

No

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Ozkaya 2012 [18]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Cupisti 2011 [19]

No

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

No

Mehrabian 2011 [20]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Melo 2011 [21]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Wijeyaratne 2011 [22]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yilmaz 2011 [23]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

No

No

No

No

Yes

Castelo-Branco 2010 [24]

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Guo 2010 [25]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Goverde 2009 [26]

Yes

Yes

No

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

No

Barber 2007 [27]

Yes

Yes

No

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

No

Shroff 2007 [28]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

Chen H 2014 [29]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Li YC 2014 [30]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Ha LX 2013 [31]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Tao T 2013 [32]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Li J 2011 [33]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Liu L 2011 [34]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

No

Qu ZY 2011 [35]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Xu LS 2010 [36]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Zhang L 2010 [37]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

  1. AHRQ was used to assess the quality of the cross-sectional studies—Q1:whether there was a clear source of data (surveys, literature review);Q2:whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the exposure or nonexposure groups (case and control groups) were listed or referred to as previous literature;Q3:whether the period of time to identify patients was provided;Q4:for subjects who did not come from the crowd, whether they were continuously observed;Q5:whether the other aspects of the subjects were overshadowed by the subjective factors of the evaluators;Q6:whether any evaluation to ensure the quality was described (such as test/retest of the primary outcomes);Q7:whether the reasons to exclude any patient were provided;Q8:whether the measures to evaluate and control confounding factors were described;Q9:if possible, whether the studies explain how to handle the missing data;Q10:whether the studies summarized the response rate of the patients and the integrity of data collection