Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of data published about the role of 3D-ultrasound for predicting outcome in IVF program

From: Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review

Author

N

Primary outcome

3D Method

Day 3D US

Sub endometrial area

Pregnancy rate (PR)

Findings

Raga (65)

72

Pregnancy rate

Multislice

Embryo transfer

 

29.2%

No pregnancy if endometrial volume < 1 ml

If endometrial volume ≥ 2 ml, no difference in PR

Schild (64)

47

Pregnancy rate

Multislice

Oocyte retrieval

 

31.9%

No difference in endometrial volume between conception and non-conception cycles

Yaman (66)

65

Pregnancy rate

Multislice

HCG

 

32.3%

No difference in endometrial volume between conception and non-conception cycles

No pregnancy if endometrial volume < 2.5 ml

Zollner (67)

125

Pregnancy rate

Multislice

Embryo transfer

 

27.2%

PR 35% if endometrial volume ≥ 2.5 ml

PR 9% if endometrial volume < 2.5 ml

Schild (68)

96

Pregnancy rate

Multislice

1st day ovarian stimulation

 

20%

Subendometrial VI, FI and VFI lower in conception cycles

Kupesic (69)

89

Pregnancy rate

Multislice

Embryo transfer

5 mm

31.5%

No difference in endometrial volume, subendometrial VI and VFI between conception and non-conception cycles Subendometrial FI higher in conception cycles

Wu (79)

54

Pregnancy rate

Multislice

HCG

5 mm

50%

Subendometrial VFI higher in conception cycles.

No differences in subendometrial VI and FI

No differences in endometrial VI, FI and VFI

Jarvela (71)

35

Pregnancy rate

VOCAL

Before HCG and 36 hours after oocyte retrieval

10 mm

37%

No difference in endometrial volume, endometrial/subendometrial VI. FI and VFI

Ng (73)

451

Pregnancy rate

VOCAL

Oocyte retrieval

1 mm

20.8%

Endometrial VI and VFI lower in conception cycles.

No differences in endometrial volume and subendometrial VI, FI and VFI