Skip to main content

Table 5 Cost-minimization analysis and (last row) percentage variation of economical parameters in r-FSH vs. HP-uFSH treatment

From: Recombinant versus highly-purified, urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH vs. HP-uFSH) in ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized study with cost-minimization analysis

 

Mean FSH IU/cycle (95%CI)

Mean n. of vials/cycle (95%CI) (A)

Cost per vial (€) (B)

Mean cost/cycle (€) (C) = (A) × (B)

Total n. of vials (95%CI) (D) = (A) × 130

N. of deliveries (95%CI) (E)

Total n. of vials/delivery (F) = (D)/(E)

Cost per delivery (€) (B) × (F)

HP-uFSH

844 (741–947)

11.3 (9.9–12.6)

15.55

175.71

1,469 (1,287–1,638)

13 (6–20)

113 (214–82)

1,757.15

r-FSH

668 (575–761)

8.9 (7.7–10.1)

23.40

208.26

1,157 (1,001–1,313)

17 (9–25)

68 (111–53)

1,591.20

%

-20.8

-21.2

+50.5

+18.5

-21.2

+30.8

-39.8

-9.4