Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes

From: Effect of Coenzyme Q10 and transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective controlled study

Variables

Group A (n = 102)

Group B (n = 104)

Group C (n = 93)

#P (ABC)

#P (AB)

#P (AC)

#P (BC)

Cycle concellation (n)

 Concel

8

6

17

0.026

0.581

0.056

0.015

 Transfer

102

104

93

Embryo transfer (n)

 Fresh ET

63

68

55

0.661

NS

NS

NS

 FET

39

36

38

 D3 embryo

48

44

40

0.763

NS

NS

NS

 Blastocyst

54

60

53

 Single embryo

46

43

52

0.108

NS

NS

NS

 Two embryos

56

61

41

Reproductive outcome (%)

 IR

23.40 (37/158)

28.50 (47/165)

17.20 (23/134)

0.071

0.299

0.188

0.022

 CPR

30.40 (31/102)

38.50 (40/104)

21.50(20/93)

0.036

0.223

0.158

0.010

 LBR

24.50 (25/102)

31.70 (33/104)

17.20(16/93)

0.062

0.249

0.211

0.019

 Early abortion rate

16.10 (5/31)

15.00 (6/40)

20.00 (4/20)

0.884

NS

NS

NS

  1. CPR clinical pregnancy rate, ET embryo transfer, FET frozen-thawed embryo transfer, IR implantation rate, LBR live birth rate
  2. # χ2 test; NS not significant