Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline details of pivotal studies included in the review for planned oocyte cryopreservation

From: Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation

Author, year (ref)

Type of study

Study population

Sample size

Mean age at cryopreservation in years

Stimulation Protocol

Mean number of mature oocytes (MIIs) cryopreserved

Blakemore et al., 2021 [29]

Retrospective

≥ 1 POC

231 patients (280 cycles)

38.2 (range 23-45)

Antagonist, LDL, Microflare

< 35: 13.8

35-37: 11.5

38-40: 9.0

41-42: 9.9

> 42: 6.8

Cobo et al., 2018 [7]

Retrospective

POC and MOC

6362 patients

5289 POC (7044 cycles)

1073 MOC (1172 cycles)

POC: 37.2 ± 4.9

MOC: 32.3 ± 3.5

Antagonist

Agonist

Antagonist+letrozole

POC: 7.3 ± 11.3 per cycle

MOC: 8.7 ± 2.1 per cycle

Doyle et al., 2016 [30]

Retrospective

Women undergoing IVF/ICSI for infertility compared to POC + MOC

128 POC + MOC cycles

1283 vitrified/warmed

oocytes

2963 fresh ICSI cycles in infertile couples

POC + MOC: 34.9

Fresh: 35.5

Antagonist, Microflare

POC + MOC: 8.0

Fresh: 10.1

Garcia-Velasco et al., 2013 [31]

Retrospective

POC and MOC

1035 patients (1080 cycles)

560 POC (725 cycles)

475 MOC (355 cycles)

POC: 36.7 ± 4.2

MOC: 31.9 ± 5.1

Antagonist Antagonist+letrozole

POC: 9.9 per patient

MOC: 8.5 per patient

Goldman et al., 2017 [32]

Retrospective, modeling study

First fresh male-factor and/or tubal factor only autologous ICSI cycles and egg donation cycles

Male factor and or tubal factor (n = 466)

Egg donation (n = 54)

Autologous: NA

Donor: 28.5

NA

≤ 35: 13.7 ± 7.5

36: 14.6 ± 7.4

37: 11.8 ± 6.9

38: 8.5 ± 5.7

39: 8.5 ± 4.9

40: 8.3 ± 5.6

41: 9.7 ± 4.2

42: 10.3 ± 6.9

> 42: 6.9 ± 5.6

Gürtin et al., 2019 [33]

Retrospective

POC and non-POC

129 patients

46 POC (64 cycles)

83 non-POC (96 cycles)

POC: 37.7

Non-POC: 37.2

NA

POC: 9.3 per cycle

Non-POC: 6.1 per cycle

POC: 14.0 per patient

Non-POC: 11.2 per patient

Leung et al., 2021 [34]

Retrospective

POC < 38 versus ≥38 years old

921 patients (1265 cycles)

38.1 ± 1.8 (range 34-42)

NA

< 38: 18.4 ± 9.2

≥38: 15.2 ± 7.7 per patient

Maslow et al., 2020 [35]

Retrospective

≥ 1 POC

1241 patients (1799 cycles)

35.6 ± 3.26

Antagonist, Microflare

1st cycles (n = 1241):

≤ 35: 15.41 ± 9.53

35-37: 12.12 ± 8.26

38-40: 9.75 ± 7.72

41-42: 7.25 ± 6.76

> 42: 6.12 ± 4.73

2nd cycles (n = 401):

≤ 35: 10.87 ± 7.74

35-37: 9.60 ± 6.44

38-40: 7.84 ± 4.84

41-42: 8.12 ± 6.90

> 42: 4.30 ± 2.95

Nagy et al., 2017 [36]

Prospective, phase IV, multicenter, observation registry

First cycles using thaw/warmed cryopreserved (slow freeze & vitrification) oocytes (autologous or donor)

193 patients

Slow freeze: 25.1 ± 2.7 (range 20-31)

Vitrified: 26.0 ± 2.8 (range 21-31)

NA

NA

Wafi et al., 2020 [37]

Retrospective, survey

POC

138 completed surveys

35.7 (range 24-42)

NA

17.6

Wennberg et al., 2018 [38]

Retrospective

POC

254 patients

36.9 (range 23-43)

NA

7.6

  1. POC planned oocyte cryopreservation, MOC medical oocyte cryopreservation, NA not available, ICSI intracytoplasmic sperm injection, OC oocyte cryopreservation, LDL low-dose luteal