Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Comparison of clinical outcomes from LPOS and FPOS protocols

From: Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial

 LPOSFPOSp valueMean Difference (95% CI)
Oocytes MII, mean ± SD2.1 ± 2.02.6 ± 2.20.31a0.57 (− 1.67, 1.14)
COCs, mean ± SD2.7 ± 2.53.1 ± 2.10.44a0.47 (− 1.66, 0.73)
Length of stimulation, mean ± SD, days8.4 ± 2.88.2 ± 4.10.69a0.2 (− 2.5, 2.1)
Total FSH dose, mean ± SD, IU2505 ± 9132445 ± 6900.76a65 (353.5, 483.5)
Cancellation rate, %20100.09b1.6 (0.61, 4.15)
Survival rate, %94.983.60.09 a1.01 (0.98, 1.04)
Fertilization rate, %68.965.70.78a1.01 (0.99, 1.04)
OSI0.960.570.040.39 (0.02, 0.75)
  1. COCs cumulus-oocyte complexes, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, OSI Ovarian Sensitivity Index, MII metaphase II, SD standard deviation
  2. aCalculated using student t-test
  3. bCalculated using χ2 test