Skip to main content

Table 3 IVF Outcomes per Megaregion

From: Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.

Megaregions

ICSI Rate**

(mean % ± SD)

Male Factor

(mean % ± SD)ƭ

Implantation Rate*

(mean % ± SD)

Pregnancy Rate*

(mean % ± SD)

Live Birth Rate**

(mean % ± SD)

1. Great Lakes

75.3 ± 16.1

38.8 ± 14.6

35.2 ± 7.6

45 ± 8.8

39.3 ± 8.9

2. Northeast

63.4 ± 20.4

31.7 ± 14.4

34.8 ± 9.8

42.7 ± 11

36.0 ± 10.3

3. Southern California

82.3 ± 14.2

30.2 ± 13.3

39.9 ± 9.7

51.6 ± 9.9

44.9 ± 10.5

4. Texas Triangle

67.8 ± 20.3

36.0 ± 10.4

41.7 ± 5.7

50.9 ± 9.2

45.7 ± 8.4

5. Piedmont Atlantic

77.7 ± 12.9

38.5 ± 12.9

37.2 ± 6.4

47.2 ± 9.3

40.5 ± 9.3

6. Florida

64.8 ± 18.6

38.2 ± 17.6

36.2 ± 7.1

45 ± 5.1.0

38.6 ± 5.1

7. Northern California

66.0 ± 16.8

35.9 ± 12.7

35.5 ± 9.6

46.6 ± 8.9

40.9 ± 7.9

8. Gulf Coast

83.1 ± 10.0

34.1 ± 11.7

36.9 ± 9.02

46.3 ± 11.2

41.2 ± 11.2

9. Cascadia

68.0 ± 16.6

34.2 ± 12.0

40.9 ± 8.9

46.5 ± 9.9

42.0 ± 9.9

10. Arizona Sun Corridor

73.0 ± 19.2

38.5 ± 22.9

34.6 ± 8.02

46.6 ± 12.6

39.0 ± 12.4

11. Front Range

93.5 ± 3.5

39.0 ± 19.8

55.7 ± 4.2

65.5 ± 6.2

59.0 ± 1.8

  1. P value for columns ƭ =0.20, * < 0.001; ** < 0.0001