Skip to main content

Table 3 IVF Outcomes per Megaregion

From: Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.

Megaregions ICSI Rate**
(mean % ± SD)
Male Factor
(mean % ± SD)ƭ
Implantation Rate*
(mean % ± SD)
Pregnancy Rate*
(mean % ± SD)
Live Birth Rate**
(mean % ± SD)
1. Great Lakes 75.3 ± 16.1 38.8 ± 14.6 35.2 ± 7.6 45 ± 8.8 39.3 ± 8.9
2. Northeast 63.4 ± 20.4 31.7 ± 14.4 34.8 ± 9.8 42.7 ± 11 36.0 ± 10.3
3. Southern California 82.3 ± 14.2 30.2 ± 13.3 39.9 ± 9.7 51.6 ± 9.9 44.9 ± 10.5
4. Texas Triangle 67.8 ± 20.3 36.0 ± 10.4 41.7 ± 5.7 50.9 ± 9.2 45.7 ± 8.4
5. Piedmont Atlantic 77.7 ± 12.9 38.5 ± 12.9 37.2 ± 6.4 47.2 ± 9.3 40.5 ± 9.3
6. Florida 64.8 ± 18.6 38.2 ± 17.6 36.2 ± 7.1 45 ± 5.1.0 38.6 ± 5.1
7. Northern California 66.0 ± 16.8 35.9 ± 12.7 35.5 ± 9.6 46.6 ± 8.9 40.9 ± 7.9
8. Gulf Coast 83.1 ± 10.0 34.1 ± 11.7 36.9 ± 9.02 46.3 ± 11.2 41.2 ± 11.2
9. Cascadia 68.0 ± 16.6 34.2 ± 12.0 40.9 ± 8.9 46.5 ± 9.9 42.0 ± 9.9
10. Arizona Sun Corridor 73.0 ± 19.2 38.5 ± 22.9 34.6 ± 8.02 46.6 ± 12.6 39.0 ± 12.4
11. Front Range 93.5 ± 3.5 39.0 ± 19.8 55.7 ± 4.2 65.5 ± 6.2 59.0 ± 1.8
  1. P value for columns ƭ =0.20, * < 0.001; ** < 0.0001