Figure 1From: Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification Effects of slow freezing and vitrification on chromatin integrity of mouse embryos at the morula and blastocyst stage. Panel A: percentages of embryos graded according to chromatin damage (for details and criteria see M&M) as grade A (no damage, white segments), grade B (slight damage, gray segments) or grade C (severe damage, black segments). Embryos were grouped according to their developmental stage, observed after slow freezing/thawing or vitrification/warming and compared with controls. Numbers of analyzed embryos per group are indicated on each histogram and segment. Chi square test with the Yates correction: comparisons slow freezing vs control and vitrification vs control: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.0001; comparisons slow freezing vs vitrification: # P < 0.001; ## P < 0.0001. Panel B: Representative photomicrographs of control grade A morula (A1) and control grade A blastocyst (A2), slow frozen grade C morula (B1) and slow frozen grade C blastocyst (B2), vitrified grade B morula (C1) and vitrified grade B blastocyst (C2) are shown. The nuclei of embryos were stained with Hoechst 33258. For each embryo, UV light images are shown. Arrows indicate signs of chromatin damage: white thin arrows indicate micronuclei and white thick arrows indicate lobulated nuclei. Scale bar represents 20 μm.Back to article page