Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of cycle outcome parameters after ICSI with epididymal or testicular sperm from males with obstructive (OA) and non-obstructive (NOA) azoospermia

From: Paternal effect on genomic activation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate after ICSI with cryopreserved epididymal versus testicular spermatozoa

Sperm Type

Epididymal

Testicular

Obstructive

OA

Testicular

Non Obstructive

NOA

P value

Number of retrieval cycles

77

59

20

-

Number of transfers

75

58

19

-

Male partner age

39.0 ± 8.6

39.3 ± 7.5

36.0 ± 4.8

NS

Maternal age

31.9 ± 4.0

32.9 ± 3.5

32.3 ± 4.0

NS

Average number of oocytes

14.0 ± 5.8

14.2 ± 6.2

13.5 ± 7.3

NS

Average oocytes injected

11.2 ± 5.5

10.8 ± 6.0

9.8 ± 4.0

NS

Average oocytes fertilized

7.2 ± 4.4

7.3 ± 4.0

4.9 ± 4.0

0.06

Fertilization rate

65%

66%

50%a

< 0.001

Cleavage rate

97%

99%

97%

NS

Average embryos transferred

2.2 ± 0.6

2.5 ± 0.7b

2.2 ± 0.8

< 0.05

Average cells on Day 3

7.5 ± 1.7

7.6 ± 2.1

6.5 ± 2.3

NS

Clinical pregnancy rate

61%

59%

37%

NS

Implantation rate

39%

34%

20%

NS

Deliveries (n)

46

33

7

-

Singleton (n)

32

22

6

-

Twins (n)

12

10

1

-

Triplets (n)

2

1

0

-

Boys (n)

31

23

5

-

Girls (n)

31

22

3

-

Miscarriages (n)

0

1

0

-

  1. a Significantly different from ES and TESE-OA
  2. b Significantly different from ES and TESE-NOA