Open Access

Alterations in the steroid hormone receptor co-chaperone FKBPL are associated with male infertility: a case-control study

  • Olaf Sunnotel1,
  • Laszlo Hiripi1,
  • Kevin Lagan1,
  • Jennifer R McDaid1,
  • Johanny M De León2,
  • Yasushi Miyagawa3,
  • Hannah Crowe1,
  • Soniya Kaluskar1,
  • Michael Ward1,
  • Catherine Scullion1,
  • Alan Campbell1,
  • CS Downes4,
  • David Hirst5,
  • David Barton6,
  • Edgar Mocanu7,
  • Akira Tsujimura3,
  • Marc B Cox2,
  • Tracy Robson5 and
  • Colum P Walsh1Email author
Contributed equally
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology20108:22

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-22

Received: 16 November 2009

Accepted: 8 March 2010

Published: 8 March 2010



Male infertility is a common cause of reproductive failure in humans. In mice, targeted deletions of the genes coding for FKBP6 or FKBP52, members of the FK506 binding protein family, can result in male infertility. In the case of FKBP52, this reflects an important role in potentiating Androgen Receptor (AR) signalling in the prostate and accessory glands, but not the testis. In infertile men, no mutations of FKBP52 or FKBP6 have been found so far, but the gene for FKBP-like (FKBPL) maps to chromosome 6p21.3, an area linked to azoospermia in a group of Japanese patients.


To determine whether mutations in FKBPL could contribute to the azoospermic phenotype, we examined expression in mouse and human tissues by RNA array blot, RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry and sequenced the complete gene from two azoospermic patient cohorts and matching control groups. FKBPL-AR interaction was assayed using reporter constructs in vitro.


FKBPL is strongly expressed in mouse testis, with expression upregulated at puberty. The protein is expressed in human testis in a pattern similar to FKBP52 and also enhanced AR transcriptional activity in reporter assays. We examined sixty patients from the Japanese patient group and found one inactivating mutation and one coding change, as well as a number of non-coding changes, all absent in fifty-six controls. A second, Irish patient cohort of thirty showed another two coding changes not present in thirty proven fertile controls.


Our results describe the first alterations in the gene for FKBPL in azoospermic patients and indicate a potential role in AR-mediated signalling in the testis.


Genetic causes are thought to account for 10-15% of cases of severe male infertility [1]. Azoospermia is most commonly associated with microdeletions of the AZF gene on the Y chromosome [2, 3], but mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene [4], important for sex hormone signalling, are also associated with this phenotype. Known mutations in these and other genes still only account for a fraction of azoospermia cases, suggesting that other genetic causes remain to be discovered.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) can result in a variety of defects in the affected patient, including gynecomastia, cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Mild AIS (MAIS) on the other hand can have infertility as the only symptom and patients often show no mutations in the AR gene [5]. Defects in AR coactivators have already been implicated in one case of complete androgen resistance in humans [6] and in two sisters with partial resistance to multiple steroid hormones [7]. Homozygous deletion of the AR cochaperone FK506 binding protein 52 (FKBP52) in mice has been shown independently by two groups to result in male infertility and hypospadias with underdevelopment of the prostate and seminal vesicles [8, 9]. Both groups found evidence for compromised AR activity in the knockout mice, and showed that FKBP52 potentiates AR signalling in response to androgen in prostate cell lines. Though the testes in the FKBP52 knockout mice were normal, cell type-specific AR deletions in mice have shown a requirement for the receptor in Sertoli cells during normal spermatogenesis [10, 11]. This suggests that another AR cochaperone might exist in the testis which is required for optimal AR activity in these cells.

FK506 binding protein-like (FKBPL, aka DIR-1 and WISp39) was first described as a radioresponsive gene [12] and is a less well-characterised member of the FKBP family. It demonstrates binding to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) through its conserved tetratricopeptide (TPR) repeats [13] and more recently it has been shown to interact with and stimulate the activity of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in human cell lines [14]. The PPI domain of FKBPL lacks crucial catalytic residues needed for the isomerase activity seen in other family members like FKBP6, which alters target protein conformation and helps regulate assembly of multiprotein complexes for clients such as ryanodine receptor and mTOR [15]. FKBP52 has one functional PPI domain, but catalytic activity may not actually be required for FKBP52-mediated regulation of AR function [16]. FKBPL maps to human chromosome 6p21.3: linkage studies in a Japanese population [17] implicate this region specifically in azoospermia (LOD score 3.5, p = 0.0005). The region contains a large number of genes, some of which were excluded by candidate studies [18]. There are also three cases of chromosomal breakpoints in this region leading to infertility in azoospermic males on the Mendelian Cytogenetics Network database, with two of these listed as azoospermic [19]. A separate report describes a family where six members carry a 6p21 translocation and show male-only (n = 3) infertility and azoospermia [20].

We examined FKBPL expression in mouse and human tissues and sequenced DNA from two human azoospermic patient cohorts, finding alterations in the gene. Furthermore, we provide evidence that FKBPL can increase transcription of AR targets in response to androgen and that the altered proteins seen in patients may be deficient in this activity.



Patient samples were obtained with informed consent and approved for screening by the Ethical Approval committees of the respective institutes. The cohort of azoospermic patients from Osaka University, Japan, have been previously described and patients showing obstructive azoospermia or chromosomal abnormalities were excluded [17]: DNA from a control group of healthy Japanese males was obtained from the same source. The thirty azoospermic patient samples from Human Assisted Reproduction Ireland, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland showed no Y chromosome microdeletions or chromosome abnormalities: the control group here were thirty proven fertile males [21]. Obstructive azoospermia was excluded for both patient groups.


Tissues were collected from Swiss/To (Harlan, UK) mice, which were maintained in accordance with the Home Office regulations under project licence to CPW.

Analysis of Fkbpl mRNA expression by RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit, including the optional DNAse treatment, following the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) and 1 μg used to make cDNA in a 12.5 μl mixture containing 10 mM Tris HCL (pH 8.3), 0.2 μg Oligo(dT)15 primer (Promega, Southampton, UK), 1.5 mM dNTPs, 1× AMV-RT buffer and 7.5 U AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Southampton, UK). Primers specific for Fkbpl (musdirf5ex CTTCCAGGCCTCAACATCAT and musdirR TCCCAGCTCGAAACAGTTCT: chr17 34781824-34782871 NCBI build 37; cDNA 756 nt; DNA 1028 nt) or β-actin (Bact1 GCTGTGCTATGTTGCTCTAGACTTC and Bact2 CTCAGTAACAGTCCGCCTAGAAGC: chr5 143665461-143666180; cDNA 500 nt; DNA 730 nt) were supplied by Invitrogen, Paisley, UK. All primers were checked for uniqueness and location using the BLAT tool available at the UCSC website [22]. PCR was performed in 25 μl containing 1× Taq buffer, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.4 μM primer, 2 U Taq (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) and 1 μl cDNA. Initial deannealing at 94°C for 3 min was followed by 28 cycles of 45 sec at 94°C, 1 min at 61°C, and 1 min at 72°C and a final elongation for 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated on agarose gels and images captured using a Kodak digital camera.

RNA expression analysis using radioactive probes

A Mouse RNA Master Blot array normalised to provide semi-quantitative data on tissue specificity and target mRNA abundance was purchased from BD Biosciences, Cowley, UK. Human and mouse FKBPL coding-region probes were amplified by PCR using: HumanF CTAGGCTCCTGCTGCCGGCTACTG and HumanR TCAGCAGTTGCTTTTTCCAGGTCC; musdirF GAACGAGAAGAACACCGCTC and musdirR TCCCAGCTCGAAACAGTTCT. Northern blotting, radiolabelling of cDNA and detection of mRNA were as previously described [23].

Nucleotide sequence screening of FKBPL gene

The whole FKBPL gene was directly amplified from patient DNA using primers 5'-GGCTCCAGGGTTAGTTGTCA-3' and 5' CCCAAATCTCACAGCACA GA-3' and purified with the Wizard Gel PCR clean-up kit (Promega, Southampton, UK). Sequencing was done using primers S1 5'-AACCAGTCAGATGCCAGAGG-3', S2 5'-CCTCTGG CATCTGACTGGTT-3', S3 5'-GAACCAGGTTCAGGTCAGC-3', S4 5'-GACTAG CGAGAAGGAAGCC-3' and S5 5'-GGCTTCCTTCTCGCTAGTC-3' on an ABI Prism 3130 at the Centre for Molecular Biosciences Sequencing Facility. Patient sequences were compared with the REFSEQ entry and examined for known variations using the UCSC browser [22]. Zygosity of mutations was confirmed by sequencing TOPO-TA (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) cloned PCR products.

Generation of expression constructs and reporter assays

N-terminal GFP-tagged constructs were generated by cloning into pcDNA3.1/NT-TOPO-GFP (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) using the primers fkbplF0: GAGACCCCACCA CTCAATAC and fkbplR0: TCAGCCAAACATCTTGCCC. LNCaP cells (4 × 104 per well) were seeded in 24-well plates coated with fibronectin (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) and maintained in phenol red-free RPMI1640 with 10% charcoal-dextran stripped FBS and 10 mM HEPES at 5% CO2 for 24 h. Cells were then co-transfected for 6 h using lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) with pPA6.1Luc reporter construct, GFP-FKBPL-WTl or a pcDNA3.1 empty vector control together with the pBIND Renilla transfection efficiency control. The transfection mix was then replaced by the RPMI media with or without 10 nM R1881 and luciferase activity assessed 24 h post-transfection using the Dual-Glo assay system (Promega, Southampton, UK).

Western blot analysis

Whole cell protein extracts were obtained by lysis with extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA,10% glycerol, 1% Igepal,1% protease inhibitor cocktail for mammalian cells (Sigma)), followed by centrifugation to remove debris. A 30 μg aliquot was fractionated on a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Biorad, Hemel Hempstead, UK) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at RT with 5% preimmune serum in Tris-buffered saline with 0.2% Tween-20 (TBST) prior to incubation with a 1:800 dilution of anti-FKBPL rabbit polyclonal IgG (cat. no. 10060-1-AP, Proteintech Group, Chicago, USA) in TBST. After washing with TBST, membranes were exposed to a horseradish peroxidise (HRP) conjugated secondary antibody (sc-3837, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA) and signal detected using ECL reagents (GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK).


Paraffin-embedded sections of a fertile human testis were obtained from ProSci Inc, Poway, California, USA. For FKBPL and FKBP52, tissue was dewaxed and rehydrated through an alcohol series prior to antigen retrieval by heating in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using a 600 W microwave oven (2 × 3 min). Blocking was carried out with 10% serum in PBS-Tween20 (PBST) for 1 h at RT followed by 15 min with 1% hydrogen peroxide to remove endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were washed twice with PBST then incubated overnight with 1:100 rabbit anti-human FKBPL (ProteinTech Group Inc, Chicago) or 1:250 dilution of anti-FKBP52 (cat#10011442, Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) at 4°C, followed by 1 h incubation with 1:2000 goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP. Immunostaining was carried out with DAB Substrate Plus kit (Zymed, South San Francisco, USA), before counterstaining with hematoxylin (Sigma, Welwyn Garden City UK), dehydrating and mounting in Mowiol (Calbiochem, Nottingham, UK). For AR, immunostaining was essentially as described previously for this antibody (PG21, Millipore, Billerica, MA) [24], with a Vectastain ABC kit (Vector, Peterborough, UK) used for signal amplification and the Impact DAB kit (Vector) used for staining.

Statistical analysis

To examine differences in mutation frequencies between patient and control groups, Chi-squared values were calculated from a contingency table (Yate's method) and used to calculate significance values (p) by Fisher's exact method in the PRISM application (Graphpad, San Diego, USA).


Structure and expression

FKBPL is encoded by a small two-exon gene (Fig. 1A). The protein contains a peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPI) domain (Fig. 1B) and a region containing tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR), like other members of the FKBP family of proteins, which act as cochaperones for steroid receptor complexes. FKBPL shows low homology over the PPI domain and lacks critical residues that have been shown to be required for enzymatic activity (Fig. 1C), but is relatively well conserved at the TPR, which have been shown to be functional in binding HSP90 [13]. The protein is highly conserved across several mammalian species, indicative of an important function.
Figure 1

FKBPL structure and conservation. A. Structure of the human and mouse genes. The gene consists of two exons, joined by a short intron. The open reading frame is in grey, lengths in base pairs are indicated. The positions of the gene alterations seen in patients and listed in Table 1 are indicated above the human sequence. B. Protein structure. Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPI) domains are shown in yellow, tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR) in green. FKBP12 has a PPI domain but contains no TPR. FKBP52 and FKBP51 contain a duplication of the PPI domain, but the C-terminal copy is inactive (X). FKBP6 and FKBPL have N-terminal regions with some homology to the PPI.C. Alignment of the PPI domains from FKBP6, FKBP12 and FKBPL by CLUSTALW: residues conserved in PPI with good enzymatic activity are indicated above the alignment but can be seen to be poorly conserved in FKBPL.

Screening of a normalised Mouse RNA Master Blot array showed very high levels of expression in testis and epididymis (Fig. 2A), high levels in submaxillary gland and low levels in all other tissues: this was confirmed by northern blotting (Fig. 2B). RT-PCR of testis mRNA showed that transcription of the gene is turned on during sexual maturation in the male mouse at puberty (Fig. 2C). Expression in humans was assessed using a similar array which contained 75 tissue-specific polyA+ RNAs: transcription was more widespread, but was again strongest in testis (data not shown). An antibody has recently been raised to FKBPL. We carried out immunostaining on human testis sections to see if FKBPL is expressed here (Fig. 3A). Staining was found in most cells of the tubule, including the Sertoli cells, which can be distinguished by an ovoid nucleus with a single prominent nucleolus [25]. There was no staining in the peritubular myoid cells or blood vessels but the interstitial Leydig cells were prominently stained. Staining of the same sections with an antibody to AR showed nuclear staining of Sertoli, Leydig and peritubular myoid cells but no signal was visible in the germ cells such as spermatids (Fig. 3A), as previously reported [24]. Staining for FKBP52 gave a similar pattern to FKBPL but with very weak or absent staining of the Leydig cells (Fig. 3A). Staining carried out with preimmune serum as a negative control gave no background. To confirm the specificity of the FKBPL antibody we carried out western blotting on human cell lines carrying a GFP-tagged version of the human protein (Fig. 3B). The antibody detected both endogenous and transfected FKBPL, with little or no background.
Figure 2

Fkbpl transcription in mouse. A. A Multiple Tissue Array normalised polyA+ RNA blot was hybridised to a radiolabelled Fkbpl cDNA. The locations of testis, epididymis and submaxillary gland RNA are indicated. Top row: brain (A1), eye (A2), liver (A3), lung (A4), kidney (A5); Second row: heart (B1), skeletal muscle (B2), smooth muscle (B3), pancreas; Third row: (C1), thyroid (C2), thymus (C3), submaxillary gland (C4), spleen (C5); Fourth row: testis (D1), ovary (D2), prostate (D3), epididymus (D4), uterus (D5); Fifth row: embryo 7 days (E1), embryo 11 days (E2), embryo 15 days (E3) and embryo 17 days (E4); Last row: negative controls (F1-4). Positions not listed (e.g. B4) are blank. B. Northern blotting. Total RNA (20 ug) was extracted from the tissues indicated and fractionated on a 1% gel containing formamide before transferring to nitrocellulose and hybridising to the cDNA probe used in A. The positions of relevant size markers are indicated at right. The experiment was repeated twice. C. RT-PCR of total RNA isolated from testis at different days postnatally. The primers span the intron, allowing any contaminating genomic product to be easily distinguished (right); β-actin is used as an internal positive control: RT- are negative controls. The experiment was repeated twice.
Figure 3

FKBPL expression in human testis. A. Immunohistochemical staining of human testis sections with the indicated antibodies. AR shows nuclear staining in Sertoli (Si), Leydig (L) and peritubular myoid (P) cells, but is negative elsewhere, including spermatids (Sd). FKBP52 is cytoplasmic, staining Sertoli and spermatogenic cells, but shows weak or absent staining in Leydig and myoid cells. FKBPL is also cytoplasmic, matching FKBP52 in most respects except for strongly staining the Leydig cells. Preimmune serum for FKBPL (shown) and other antibodies was used as a negative control (neg.). Experiments were repeated three times. Staining for FKBPL and FKBP52 was almost identical in rat testis (not shown). B. Western blot of total protein from untransfected HT29 cells (untransfect.) or transfected with a GFP-FKBPL fusion protein (transfect.). The size of the endogenous protein (endog.) is indicated. The experiment was repeated three times. C. LNCaP cells were transfected with a construct (pPA) containing luciferase driven by the prostate specific antigen transcriptional regulatory elements either with or without FKBPL as shown. The indicated cultures were additionally exposed to 1 nM of AR ligand (R1881). Luciferase activity was measured using a fluorimeter and normalised to an internal control. The experiment was carried out more than three times with similar results. D. LnCaP cells were transfected with pPA and FKBPL from normal controls (WT) or from the mutated allele seen in patient 83 (p83- listed as #6 in Table 1) and exposed to R1881. The results shown represent the median of three experiments.

Evidence for involvement in human infertility

We found that FKBPL in humans maps to a region linked to azoospermia in a Japanese population (LOD score 3.5, p = 0.0005) [17]. We examined 60 of the patient samples used in that study and 56 controls from the same population and looked for mutations in the FKBPL gene by direct sequencing, which we numbered in order from the 5' end of the gene (Table 1 and Fig. 1A). This identified two patients carrying heterozygous mutations in the gene in the azoospermic group, one a mutation in the canonical splice acceptor site (CA G/G -> CG G/G) for the only coding exon, shown previously to give loss of function [26] (mutation 3, Table 1), and the other an insertion which is predicted to alter a binding pocket (mutation 6, Table 1). These mutations were confirmed by cloning PCR products and sequencing individual clones and by sequencing of blinded samples at a second laboratory. Neither mutation was present in our control group. We also examined a cohort of 30 patients from an Irish infertile male population where Y chromosome microdeletions and chromosomal abnormalities have been excluded and a matched control group of 30 fertile Irish males. Two of the Irish patient samples had single amino acid changes in the coding region (mutations 4 and 5, Table 1) which were not found in the control group. The Japanese and Irish patients also showed significantly different frequencies of synonymous mutations at two sites compared to controls (mutations 1 and 2, Table 1), suggesting that these alterations may be functionally significant or tightly linked to as-yet unidentified alterations elsewhere.
Table 1

Sequence differences between azoospermic patients and matched controlsa







Base change



0 Japanese patients,c

12 controls


Base change



10 Japanese patients,d

0 controls


Base change


(as above)

8 Irish patients,e

1 control


Splice site

Loss of function


1 Japanese patient,

0 controls


Base change



1 Irish patient,

0 controls


Base change



1 Irish patient,

0 controls



4AA duplication


1 Japanese patient,

0 controls

aGroup sizes: Japanese patients (n = 60) and Japanese controls (n = 56); Irish patients (n = 30) and Irish controls (n = 30).

bLocation given with respect to the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium March 2006 human reference sequence (NCBI Build 36.1).

cProbability p <0.001; d p = 0.0014, e p = 0.026 by Fisher's exact test, see also methods

fListed twice, as the frequencies and associated probabilities differ in the two populations

Possible function of FKBPL in testis

The azoospermic and infertile nature of our patient group, combined with the expression pattern of the protein, suggested that FKBPL, like FKBP52, might be a co-chaperone for Androgen Receptor in the testis. To check for AR interaction, we used the androgen-responsive prostate cancer cell LNCaP which have high levels of AR. These were transfected using a reporter construct (pPA) containing luciferase downstream of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) transcriptional regulatory elements [9] (kind gift of Dr. J.-T. Liu). Results are shown in Figure 3C: FKBPL enhanced AR activity on the PSA reporter specifically in response to ligand (R1881). These results show that FKBPL enhances transcriptional activation by AR of a major target gene. We confirmed this effect in mouse fibroblast cells co-transfected with FKBPL and AR in the presence of the reporter (not shown). In addition, we cloned the allele with the small insertion (mutation 6, Table 1) seen in Japanese patient 83 (p83). Results with this construct were however variable and while some experiments showed a marked decrease in enhancement of AR activity, on the whole activity of the PSA reporter in the presence of p83 protein was close to that seen with the wild-type protein (Figure 3D: a result representative of the median of the experiments is shown).


We describe here a number of alterations in the FKBPL gene which are found only in azoospermic males and are absent in matched controls. Four patients from two ethnic groups show different coding changes: these include mutation of the splice acceptor site for the only coding exon, a 4aa insertion in a conserved PPI binding pocket and two amino acid changes. In keeping with a potentially important role in male reproduction, the gene shows strong tissue-specific expression in the mouse testis, with transcription being initiated with the onset of sexual maturation. The human homologue is likewise strongly expressed in the cells of the testis. The protein produced is a member of a steroid hormone receptor co-chaperone family and we found the expression of FKBPL in the testis to be very similar to that of FKBP52, an androgen receptor regulator.

Both FKBP52 and FKBP6, another family member, have been implicated in male sexual development in mice, but in human case:control studies no mutations were found in either gene in azoospermic or hypospadic males [2729]. FKBP6 has been reported to be a structural component of the synaptonemal complex [30]: we could confirm from reprobing our array blot that Fkbp6 was expressed in testis only, and not epididymis and submaxillary gland where Fkbpl levels were high (data not shown). Expression in submaxillary gland is characteristic of steroid hormone signalling components [31]. Like FKBP52[8], FKBPL appears to be expressed more widely in testis, including in the Sertoli and Leydig cells, than FKBP6, which is confined to the spermatogonial stem cells only [30].

Sertoli cells are AR-producing cells located inside the testis tubules where they play a crucial role in nurturing and supporting the development of the spermatogonia and act as a blood-testis barrier, as well as producing anti-Müllerian hormone [32]. Cell type-specific knockout of AR in Sertoli cells leads to azoospermia in mice [10, 11]. FKBP52 has been shown by two groups to act as a cochaperone for AR and to boost AR transcriptional activity in response to androgen [8, 9]: homozygous deletion in mice had no effect on the testis, but prostate and other secondary sexual organs expressing FKBP52 were reduced or absent. This suggests that another co-chaperone for AR might exist in the testis and FKBPL is strongly expressed in Sertoli cells. It is notable that Leydig cells also show strong AR and FKBPL staining (Fig. 3A and [24]) but show weak signal for FKBP52 (Fig. 3A and [8]). Our data show that transfection of FKBPL into the androgen-responsive human LNCaP cell line, or into mouse fibroblasts with AR, increases signalling through the receptor in response to ligand. This is consistent with a role similar to that of FKBP52, except in the testis. The fact that FKBPL can interact with GR and probably p53 in some tissues [13] also matches the multi-client protein behaviour of FKBP52, as shown by several laboratories [8, 9, 33] and with data from the Pratt and Sanchez groups [34, 35] which suggest that the co-chaperone:client protein interaction is tissue-dependent.

The type of splice acceptor mutation in patient 25 has been shown before to result in loss of function [26] and so is predicted to prevent FKBPL production completely from this allele. If FKBPL forms part of a multimeric assembly, like other cochaperones, loss of this component might cause destabilisation of the whole complex. The insertion mutation in patient 83 is predicted to alter a binding pocket in the PPI domain of the FKBPL protein, based on the crystal structure of FKBP52. In our reporter assay, the mutated protein gave variable results but the overall trend was for a small though not statistically significant decrease in luciferase levels. This decrease in AR-mediated transcription may be more marked under physiological conditions in testis cells. The domain is highly-conserved in mammals and McKeen et al have recently shown that it is important for interaction with dynamitin and subsequent nuclear translocation of the steroid hormone:chaperone complex [14], like the PPI domain of FKBP52 [33], so the mutation also might affect this, or some other aspect of FKBPL function which is not currently well-understood.

The frequency of alterations in FKBPL in the azoospermic populations is not inconsistent with the frequencies seen for other human genes implicated in infertility, such as Y chromosome microdeletions (2-20% of infertile males [3]) or in particular the other autosomal genes such as SYCP3 (heterozygous mutations in 2/19 infertile males [36]); USP9 (17/576 patients or 3% [37]) and Protamine 1 (heterozygous mutations in 1-10% of patients [38, 39]. A large number of genes contribute to normal fertility, so it is expected that the individual contributions of any one gene will be low. The heterozygous nature of the mutations uncovered so far, a feature of the other genes implicated in human infertility listed above and consistent with a recent screen [30], could indicate haploinsufficiency, or that the mutation on the other chromosome is as yet undetected. It is also of note that the FKBP6 gene in humans has been reported to be monoallelically expressed [29].


Linkage analysis and clustering of chromosomal breakpoints in infertile males both implicate the region containing the FKBPL gene in azoospermia. Here we show that the protein, like its paralogs, can act as an AR cochaperone and is expressed at high levels specifically in mature testis. Azoospermic patient groups from two populations show mutations in the gene not present in matched controls. Overall, these results indicate that mutations in FKBPL are associated or partially responsible for infertility in males and shed light on its expression and role in the normal testis.




Work was supported by grants from Marie Curie and the Royal Society, as well as Proof of Concept funding from Invest Northern Ireland and the Irish Health Research Board (project grant 101/97). We thank Dr J-T Liu for PSA-luciferase constructs, Gesa Staats de Yanes for materials, Paul Thompson for critical discussions, as well as Rhonda Black, Velma Hayes and Bernie Doherty for technical support. MBC is supported by NIH/NIGMS Grant Number 1SC1GM084863, NIH/NCRR Grant Number 5G12RR008124 and NCRR Grant Number 5G12RR008124 and wishes to thank the Biomolecule Analysis Core Facility (BACF) for the use of instruments.

Authors’ Affiliations

Transcriptional Regulation and Epigenetics, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster
Border Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas at El Paso
Dept of Urology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine
Cancer and Ageing Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster
School of Pharmacy, Queen's University
National Centre for Medical Genetics Our Lady's Children's Hospital
Human Assisted Reproduction Ireland, Rotunda Hospital


  1. Layman LC: Human gene mutations causing infertility. J Med Genet. 2002, 39 (3): 153-161. 10.1136/jmg.39.3.153.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Reijo R, Lee TY, Salo P, Alagappan R, Brown LG, Rosenberg M, Rozen S, Jaffe T, Straus D, Hovatta O: Diverse spermatogenic defects in humans caused by Y chromosome deletions encompassing a novel RNA-binding protein gene. Nat Genet. 1995, 10 (4): 383-393. 10.1038/ng0895-383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vogt P, Chandley AC, Hargreave TB, Keil R, Ma K, Sharkey A: Microdeletions in interval 6 of the Y chromosome of males with idiopathic sterility point to disruption of AZF, a human spermatogenesis gene. Hum Genet. 1992, 89 (5): 491-496. 10.1007/BF00219172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowsing AT, Yong EL, Clark M, McLachlan RI, de Kretser DM, Trounson AO: Linkage between male infertility and trinucleotide repeat expansion in the androgen-receptor gene. Lancet. 1999, 354 (9179): 640-643. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08413-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferlin A, Arredi B, Foresta C: Genetic causes of male infertility. Reprod Toxicol. 2006, 22 (2): 133-141. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.04.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Adachi M: Androgen-insensitivity syndrome as a possible coactivator disease. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2001, 92 (7): 258-265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. New MI, Nimkarn S, Brandon DD, Cunningham-Rundles S, Wilson RC, Newfield RS, Vandermeulen J, Barron N, Russo C, Loriaux DL, O'Malley B: Resistance to several steroids in two sisters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999, 84 (12): 4454-4464. 10.1210/jc.84.12.4454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung-Flynn J, Prapapanich V, Cox MB, Riggs DL, Suarez-Quian C, Smith DF: Physiological role for the cochaperone FKBP52 in androgen receptor signaling. Mol Endocrinol. 2005, 19 (6): 1654-1666. 10.1210/me.2005-0071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yong W, Yang Z, Periyasamy S, Chen H, Yucel S, Li W, Lin LY, Wolf IM, Cohn MJ, Baskin LS, Sanchez ER, Shou W: Essential role for Co-chaperone Fkbp52 but not Fkbp51 in androgen receptor-mediated signaling and physiology. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (7): 5026-5036. 10.1074/jbc.M609360200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang C, Chen YT, Yeh SD, Xu Q, Wang RS, Guillou F, Lardy H, Yeh S: Infertility with defective spermatogenesis and hypotestosteronemia in male mice lacking the androgen receptor in Sertoli cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (18): 6876-6881. 10.1073/pnas.0307306101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Gendt K, Swinnen JV, Saunders PT, Schoonjans L, Dewerchin M, Devos A, Tan K, Atanassova N, Claessens F, Lecureuil C, Heyns W, Carmeliet P, Guillou F, Sharpe RM, Verhoeven G: A Sertoli cell-selective knockout of the androgen receptor causes spermatogenic arrest in meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (5): 1327-1332. 10.1073/pnas.0308114100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Robson T, Joiner MC, Wilson GD, McCullough W, Price ME, Logan I, Jones H, McKeown SR, Hirst DG: A novel human stress response-related gene with a potential role in induced radioresistance. Radiat Res. 1999, 152 (5): 451-461. 10.2307/3580140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jascur T, Brickner H, Salles-Passador I, Barbier V, El Khissiin A, Smith B, Fotedar R, Fotedar A: Regulation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) stability by WISp39, a Hsp90 binding TPR protein. Mol Cell. 2005, 17 (2): 237-249. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McKeen HD, McAlpine K, Valentine A, Quinn DJ, McClelland K, Byrne C, O'Rourke M, Young S, Scott CJ, McCarthy HO, Hirst DG, Robson T: A novel FK506-like binding protein interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor and regulates steroid receptor signaling. Endocrinology. 2008, 149 (11): 5724-5734. 10.1210/en.2008-0168.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang T, Donahoe PK: The immunophilin FKBP12: a molecular guardian of the TGF-beta family type I receptors. Front Biosci. 2004, 9: 619-631. 10.2741/1095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Riggs DL, Cox MB, Tardif HL, Hessling M, Buchner J, Smith DF: Non-Catalytic Role of the Fkbp52 Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerase Domain in the Regulation of Steroid Hormone Signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27 (24): 8658-8669. 10.1128/MCB.00985-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsujimura A, Ota M, Katsuyama Y, Sada M, Miura H, Matsumiya K, Gotoh R, Nakatani T, Okuyama A, Takahara S: Susceptibility gene for non-obstructive azoospermia located near HLA-DR and -DQ loci in the HLA class II region. Hum Genet. 2002, 110 (2): 192-197. 10.1007/s00439-001-0657-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsuzaka Y, Makino S, Okamoto K, Oka A, Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Takahara S, Okuyama A, Sada M, Gotoh R, Nakatani T, Ota M, Katsuyama Y, Tamiya G, Inoko H: Susceptibility locus for non-obstructive azoospermia is localized within the HLA-DR/DQ subregion: primary role of DQB1*0604. Tissue Antigens. 2002, 60 (1): 53-63. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2002.600107.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mendelian Cytogenetic Network online database. []
  20. Paoloni-Giacobino A, Kern I, Rumpler Y, Djlelati R, Morris MA, Dahoun SP: Familial t(6;21)(p21.1;p13) translocation associated with male-only sterility. Clin Genet. 2000, 58 (4): 324-328. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580411.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rovio AT, Marchington DR, Donat S, Schuppe HC, Abel J, Fritsche E, Elliott DJ, Laippala P, Ahola AL, McNay D, Harrison RF, Hughes B, Barrett T, Bailey DM, Mehmet D, Jequier AM, Hargreave TB, Kao SH, Cummins JM, Barton DE, Cooke HJ, Wei YH, Wichmann L, Poulton J, Jacobs HT: Mutations at the mitochondrial DNA polymerase (POLG) locus associated with male infertility. Nat Genet. 2001, 29 (3): 261-262. 10.1038/ng759.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kent WJ: BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (421929772): 656-64.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shovlin TC, Bourc'his D, La Salle S, O'Doherty A, Trasler JM, Bestor TH, Walsh CP: Sex-specific promoters regulate Dnmt3L expression in mouse germ cells. Hum Reprod. 2007, 22 (2): 457-467. 10.1093/humrep/del379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Suarez-Quian CA, Martinez-Garcia F, Nistal M, Regadera J: Androgen receptor distribution in adult human testis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999, 84 (1): 350-358. 10.1210/jc.84.1.350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang SX: An Atlas of Histology. 1998, New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  26. Kemp S, Ligtenberg MJ, van Geel BM, Barth PG, Sarde CO, van Oost BA, Bolhuis PA: Two intronic mutations in the adrenoleukodystrophy gene. Hum Mutat. 1995, 6 (3): 272-273. 10.1002/humu.1380060316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Beleza-Meireles A, Barbaro M, Wedell A, Tohonen V, Nordenskjold A: Studies of a co-chaperone of the androgen receptor, FKBP52, as candidate for hypospadias. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2007, 5: 8-10.1186/1477-7827-5-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Westerveld GH, Repping S, Lombardi MP, Veen van der F: Mutations in the chromosome pairing gene FKBP6 are not a common cause of non-obstructive azoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005, 11 (9): 673-675. 10.1093/molehr/gah232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang W, Zhang S, Xiao C, Yang Y, Zhoucun A: Mutation screening of the FKBP6 gene and its association study with spermatogenic impairment in idiopathic infertile men. Reproduction. 2007, 133 (2): 511-516. 10.1530/REP-06-0125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Crackower MA, Kolas NK, Noguchi J, Sarao R, Kikuchi K, Kaneko H, Kobayashi E, Kawai Y, Kozieradzki I, Landers R, Mo R, Hui CC, Nieves E, Cohen PE, Osborne LR, Wada T, Kunieda T, Moens PB, Penninger JM: Essential role of Fkbp6 in male fertility and homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis. Science. 2003, 300 (5623): 1291-1295. 10.1126/science.1083022.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaskoll T, Choy HA, Melnick M: Glucocorticoids, TGF-beta, and embryonic mouse salivary gland morphogenesis. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1994, 14 (4): 217-230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Skinner M, Griswold M, (Eds): Sertoli Cell Biology I. 2004, Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  33. Galigniana MD, Harrell JM, O'Hagen HM, Ljungman M, Pratt WB: Hsp90-binding immunophilins link p53 to dynein during p53 transport to the nucleus. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (21): 22483-22489. 10.1074/jbc.M402223200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pratt WB, Toft DO: Regulation of signaling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2003, 228 (2): 111-133.Google Scholar
  35. Banerjee A, Periyasamy S, Wolf IM, Hinds TD, Yong W, Shou W, Sanchez ER: Control of glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor subcellular localization by the ligand-binding domain is mediated by distinct interactions with tetratricopeptide repeat proteins. Biochemistry. 2008, 47 (39): 10471-10480. 10.1021/bi8011862.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Miyamoto T, Hasuike S, Yogev L, Maduro MR, Ishikawa M, Westphal H, Lamb DJ: Azoospermia in patients heterozygous for a mutation in SYCP3. Lancet. 2003, 362 (9397): 1714-1719. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14845-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun C, Skaletsky H, Birren B, Devon K, Tang Z, Silber S, Oates R, Page DC: An azoospermic man with a de novo point mutation in the Y-chromosomal gene USP9Y. Nat Genet. 1999, 23 (4): 429-432. 10.1038/70539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Imken L, Rouba H, El Houate B, Louanjli N, Barakat A, Chafik A, McElreavey K: Mutations in the protamine locus: association with spermatogenic failure?. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009, 15 (11): 733-738. 10.1093/molehr/gap056.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Iguchi N, Yang S, Lamb DJ, Hecht NB: An SNP in protamine 1: a possible genetic cause of male infertility?. J Med Genet. 2006, 43 (4): 382-384. 10.1136/jmg.2005.037168.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Sunnotel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.