Open Access

Laser capture microdissection and cDNA array analysis of endometrium identify CCL16 and CCL21 as epithelial-derived inflammatory mediators associated with endometriosis

  • Ashwini L Chand1Email author,
  • Andrew S Murray2, 4,
  • Rebecca L Jones1, 3,
  • Natalie J Hannan1,
  • Lois A Salamonsen1 and
  • Luk Rombauts2
Contributed equally
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology20075:18

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-5-18

Received: 01 March 2007

Accepted: 17 May 2007

Published: 17 May 2007

Abstract

Background

Understanding the pathophysiology of chemokine secretion in endometriosis may offer a novel area of therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to identify chemokines differentially expressed in epithelial glands in eutopic endometrium from normal women and those with endometriosis, and to establish the expression profiles of key chemokines in endometriotic lesions.

Methods

Laser capture microdissection isolated epithelial glands from endometrial eutopic tissue from women with and without endometriosis in the mid-secretory phase of their menstrual cycles. Gene profiling of the excised glands used a human chemokine and receptor cDNA array. Selected chemokines were further examined using real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry.

Results

22 chemokine/receptor genes were upregulated and two downregulated in pooled endometrial epithelium of women with endometriosis compared with controls. CCL16 and CCL21 mRNA was confirmed as elevated in some women with endometriosis compared to controls on individual samples. Immunoreactive CCL16 and CCL21 were predominantly confined to glands in eutopic and ectopic endometrium: leukocytes also stained. Immunoreactive CCL16 was overall higher in glands in ectopic vs. eutopic endometrium from the same woman (P < 0.05). Staining for CCL16 and CCL21 was highly correlated in individual tissues.

Conclusion

This study provides novel candidate molecules and suggests a potential local role for CCL16 and CCL21 as mediators contributing to the inflammatory events associated with endometriosis.

Background

Endometriosis is defined as the ectopic growth of endometrium-like tissue in locations outside the uterus including the ovaries, the uterine ligaments, the pelvic peritoneum, the Fallopian tubes and the external surface of the uterus. The mechanism/s by which endometriosis develops is still much debated; however retrograde menstruation and subsequent tissue persistence and proliferation is the most accepted theory. The complex question, why some women and not others, develop endometriotic lesions is likely to be due to differences in the local regulation of tissue proliferation, tissue remodelling and inflammatory processes. These observations also raise the question whether the current practice of prompt surgical or medical treatment is always appropriate.

Current evidence suggests that endometriosis-related pain and infertility result from local inflammation at the implant sites, with chemokine-induced recruitment and activation of immune cells [1]. Whilst some chemokines are produced constitutively, the majority (such as CXCL8 (IL-8) and CCL2 (MCP-1)) are induced upon cellular activation by inflammatory stimuli [29]. Constitutively expressed chemokines are believed to play a role in basal leukocyte trafficking and secondary lymphoid organ development while induced chemokines help marshal inflammatory, immune and angiogenic responses of the host [1012]. It is now well established that chemokines also play a role in inflammatory pain sensation (nociception) and cell growth [13]. They are also pivotal in decreased immunologic surveillance, recognition and destruction of ectopic endometrial cells and perhaps facilitation of the implantation of ectopic endometrial tissues [14, 15].

It is likely that the cascade of proinflammatory proteins secreted from endometriotic lesions and associated immune cells, dictate the extent of the inflammatory reaction linked with endometriosis, either by facilitating the survival of these lesions or by leading to their demise. Chemokines have been demonstrated to upregulate adhesion molecules and promote invasion of cancer cells [1518]. Such actions could potentially facilitate the attachment and invasion of epithelial cells into the ectopic sites, as observed in cancer metastasis [19]. A number of chemokines have previously been implicated as mediators in the ontogenesis of endometriosis [20]. The levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) [7, 8]; regulated on activation normal T-expressed and secreted (RANTES/CCL5) [21]; interleukin-8 (IL-8/CXCL8) [22, 23]; and growth-regulated oncogene-α (GROα/CXCL1) [24] are elevated in the peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis, and their concentrations correlate with the stage of the disease. Natural Killer (NK) cell activity is also mediated by chemokines and is decreased in patients with endometriosis [25].

Most studies have focused on the peritoneal fluid or serum concentrations of the chemokine of interest rather than its source. The latter may be important as the expression pattern of chemokines in the uterus is remarkably cell-type specific [26]. In addition, the cellular origin of chemokines also varies with cycle stage, although this also differs between individual cytokines [26, 27]. For example, in the mid-secretory phase of the menstrual cycle, many cytokines are produced predominantly by the epithelial cells, while in the late secretory and menstrual phases, the same cytokines are also strongly expressed in both decidualised stromal cells and leukocytes [26, 27], normal peritoneum, peritoneal fluid immune cells, and ectopic endometrial stromal cells [28]. This highlights the importance of examining not just the entire tissue but specific cell types in any tissue where inflammatory cells are abundant or where there are a number of different cell types present. Likewise in disease pathologies including endometriotic lesions, the diseased cells of interest, are surrounded by healthy tissue elements and the cell types of interest may constitute only a small proportion of the volume of the tissue biopsy sample. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) offers a means to overcome inaccuracies arising from analysis of tissues in which there is considerable cellular heterogeneity or in which leukocytes are abundant.

The strengths of two new technologies, LCM and gene array, were utilized in the present study to achieve two main aims. Firstly, to identify chemokines that are differently expressed in glands in eutopic endometrium from normal women and those with endometriosis and secondly, to establish whether these chemokines are also present in glands in endometriotic lesions. Understanding the pathophysiology of chemokine secretion in endometriosis is important as it may offer a novel area of therapeutic intervention. Inhibiting the secretion or action of specific chemokines or blocking their receptors could prevent the inappropriate recruitment of leukocytes to sites of endometriosis-related inflammation. This approach could be considered to act upstream of anti-inflammatory therapies available today which, for the most part, act on the cells already at the site of inflammation.

Methods

Patient details and tissue collection

Patients undergoing laparoscopy for pelvic pain, investigation of infertility or tubal ligation were recruited at Monash Surgical Private Hospital and at Monash Medical Centre, Moorabbin and Cranbourne Campus, all in greater Melbourne, Australia. Ethical approval was obtained from appropriate institutional ethics committees and informed consent was obtained prior to surgery.

Control subjects were those with no laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis. Endometriosis patients were assessed according to the revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine classification system [29]. Eutopic endometrium was obtained from both control and endometriosis patients by standarSd curettage. Ectopic endometriotic tissue was obtained via laparoscopic excision. Areas biopsied included peritoneum, uterosacral ligaments, and the ovary (endometriomata). Women on any hormonal preparations were excluded from the study. Patient details are provided in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of endometriosis subjects.

Endometriosis Patients

Case reference

Age (yr)

AFS stage

Sites of endometriotic lesions

Gravidity

Parity

1*#

40

II

Peritoneal

6

4

2*#

28

I

Uterosacral

0

0

3*#

28

II

Peritoneal, Uterosacral

0

0

4*

29

II

Peritoneal, Uterosacral

0

0

5

27

V

Uterosacral

0

0

6

37

V

Ovarian

1

1

7

28

V

Ovarian, Uterosacral, Pouch of Douglas

1

0

8

35

III

Ovarian

1

1

9

37

IV

Peritoneal

0

0

10

37

II

Peritoneal

7

4

Control Subjects

Case reference

Age (yr)

AFS stage

Sites of endometriotic lesions

Gravidity

Parity

1*#

42

0

-

0

0

2*#

46

0

-

3

3

3*#

30

0

-

4

2

4*

32

0

-

0

0

AFS, American Fertility Society

*used in cDNA array analysis (amplified RNA)

# used in real-time PCR analysis (unamplified RNA)

Eutopic endometrial tissue sections were designated to menstrual cycle stage by an experienced gynecological pathologist using the established Noyes endometrial dating criteria [30]. For this study, selected tissue samples, derived only from women in the mid-secretory phase (POD 6–10) were assessed for chemokine expression. Endometrial curettings (eutopic tissue) and endometriotic biopsies were snap frozen immediately at -80°C in OCT embedding medium (Sakura Finetek USA Inc., Torrance CA, USA) and stored at -80°C until use.

Tissue preparation for laser capture microdissection

Sectioning of frozen tissue samples and processing of sections were performed using methods described previously [31]. Frozen tissue blocks were maintained at -20°C and sectioned at 10 μm, and sections adhered to sterile glass slides (uncharged and uncoated; Objektträger, HD Scientific, Melbourne, Australia) by gentle warming of the slide undersurface and then refreezing at -20°C. Sections were then fixed in cold (0°C) acetone for 1 min, stained with HistoGene (Arcturus Bioscience Inc., CA, USA) for 1 min and dehydrated in 95% ethanol (1 wash, 30 sec), 100% ethanol (three washes, 30 sec each) and xylene (two washes, 5 min each). Sections were then allowed to air dry at room temperature and used for laser capture microdissection.

Laser capture microdissection

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) was used for the isolation of epithelial glands from endometrial eutopic tissue samples. Frozen tissue sections from patients with endometriosis (n = 4, marked * in Table 1) and control subjects (n = 4) were used for LCM. The PALM® MicroLaser Microdissection System (P.A.L.M. MicroLaser Technologies AG, Burnried, Germany) was utilized. Staining of frozen sections with HistoGene™ (Arcturus Bioscience Inc., CA, USA) enabled the precise selection of the glandular structures. The laser dissected glands were then ejected off the slide with a single defocused laser pulse and catapulted directly into the cap of a microfuge tube containing 10 μl droplet of TRIzol (Gibco BRL, Rockville, USA). For each patient, epithelial glands were laser-captured from approximately 20 tissue sections

RNA extraction and purification

Total RNA was isolated from each LCM sample using the TRIzol method according to manufacturer's instructions (Gibco BRL, Rockville, USA) following an initial incubation with glycogen (250 ng/μl) and TRIzol reagent for 30 min at room temperature to improve yields. RNA samples were stored at -80°C.

RNA quantification

The RNA concentration for each sample was determined with the RiboGreen fluorescence RNA assay (Molecular Probes Europe BV, Leiden, The Netherlands) with an Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA preparation of known concentration as standard and RiboGreen reagent at a final dilution of 1:500. A standard curve of 0–80 ng/well in a 96-well flat-bottomed plate was employed. This assay gave an intra-assay coefficient of variance (CV), as defined by the repeated analysis of a single RNA sample, of 3.3% (n = 16) and an inter-assay variation of 10.3% (n = 14). To assess RNA quality and tissue specificity, RNA samples were reverse transcribed and primers specific for a mid-secretory phase endometrial gland-specific gene (HtrA3) used for PCR amplification as previously described [32].

RNA amplification

Amplification of mRNA was performed to achieve the required amount of RNA for cDNA gene arrays. To obtain a representative molecular profile comparison of eutopic endometrium in each of control and endometriosis subject groups, 5 ng of LCM glandular epithelial cell-derived RNA from each of the 4 subjects in the group were pooled. T7 specific RNA amplification of mRNA was performed with the Arcturus HS RNA Amplification Kit (Arcturus) according to manufacturer's instructions. Final RNA yields following amplification, ranged from 0.5 μg to 1.5μg.

Gene array

Gene profiling was conducted using the GeArray Q Series Human Chemokine and Receptor Gene Array (SuperArray Bioscience Corp., Bethesda, USA) consisting of 77 chemokine and chemokine receptor cDNA probes, printed in quadruplicate on a nylon membrane. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), cyclophilin and β-actin were included as positive controls and PUC18 plasmid DNA as a negative control. The gene array experiments were performed as previously described [27].

For each array experiment, 100 ng amplified RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse transcriptase (MLTV-RTase) (Promega, Annandale, NSW, Australia) in the presence of biotinylated uridine 5-triphosphate (udTP) (Roche), and incubated overnight in hybridization buffer (SuperArray) containing 100 μg/ml denatured sheared salmon sperm DNA (Invitrogen Australia, Pty. Ltd., Mount Waverley, Vic, Australia) with pre-hybridized nylon arrays at 68°C. Post-hybridization washes with saline/sodium citrate/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SSC/SDS) were also conducted at 68°C. Positive cDNA binding was detected by application of a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate in blocking solution and chemiluminescent substrate, CDP-Star as supplied with the arrays (SuperArray).

Membranes were exposed to X-ray film for a range of times between 2 sec and 5 min, to ensure quantitation during the linear phase of the reaction. Arrays for the two subject groups were conducted simultaneously, and the entire experiment was then repeated. X-ray films were scanned at high resolution and densitometrically analyzed using GelDoc software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Regents Park, NSW, Australia). Chemokine signals were normalized for background signal intensity, to correct for exposure times. Gene expression for each array was also normalised to cyclophilin expression levels. Fold changes in gene expression of 2-fold or higher were considered as significantly different.

Real time RT-PCR

To confirm array data and to determine the variability between subjects, real time RT-PCR was performed on unamplified RNA derived from individual LCM samples from endometriosis and control groups (n = 3 per group: insufficient starting material was available for the remaining 2 samples). Total unamplified RNA (5 ng) was reverse transcribed using avian myeloblastosis virus-reverse transcriptase (AMV-RTase) (Promega, NSW, Australia) and 1 ng random hexanucleotide primers (Amersham Biosciences, NJ, USA), and the cDNA generated was subsequently amplified by PCR for specific primer pairs encoding CCL16, CCL21 and 18S RNA genes (for primer sequence refer to [27]).

The Roche Light Cycler Real-time PCR system was used (Roche Diagnostics Australia Pty Ltd, NSW, Australia) where 4 μl cDNA (diluted 1 in 10) was added to a master mix including SYBR Green I, deoxynucleotide triphosphates, Taq polymerase enzyme, optimized concentrations of MgCl2, and specific primers (0.5 pmol/μl; Sigma Genosys, Australia Pty. Ltd., NSW, Australia). An initial denaturing step was performed for 10 min at 95°C, before 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 55–66°C for 5 sec (annealing temperature specific to primer pair [27]) and 72°C for 10 sec. All samples to be compared were included within the same run and the entire PCR experiment was performed in duplicate.

Expression of mRNA was quantitated by comparison with a 6-point standard curve of serially diluted (10-fold) cDNA standards specific to the gene product. The standard doses ranged between 2.5 ng/μl and 0.5 fg/μl. Fluorescence from incorporation of SYBR green into double-stranded PCR products was monitored continuously during cycling at the end of each elongation phase, and quantitation of mRNA expression was performed when amplified products were in the log-linear phase and parallel to the standards. A quality control (a single endometrial cDNA sample) was included in every run. At the end of each program, melting curve analysis was carried out to ensure specificity of the reaction products. The sizes of the products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis and DNA sequenced to confirm identity for selected samples. Data was normalized for the expression of 18S RNA.

Immunohistochemistry

For the further verification of gene array and real time RT-PCR data, frozen sections from 3 of the 4 same endometriosis patients and control subjects, along with tissue sections from an additional 8 normal and 7 endometriosis subjects, were used for the immunohistochemical comparison of chemokine (CCL16 and CCL21) protein expression (n = 12 and 10 respectively per group). Glands were not found in the frozen endometriotic lesion of one endometriosis patient who had been included in the array study and this subject was thus excluded from this part of the study. Affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies raised against human CCL21 and CCL16 peptides (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were utilized for immunohistochemistry as previously described [27]. Positive controls (normal eutopic endometrium) previously shown to have positive staining for CCL16 and CCL21, were included in every run. Negative controls were sections of each tissue included on the same slide but with non-immune IgG at the same concentration substituted for the primary antibodies. For immunostaining, 10 μm sections were post-fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 10 min, rehydrated and exposed to microwave antigen retrieval for 5 min before cooling. Primary antibodies were applied overnight (17 ± 1 h) at 4°C, diluted to 4 μg/ml in non-immune block containing 10% horse serum (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia) and 2% human serum (in-house) in TBS with 0.1% Tween 20.

Detection of positive binding was performed by the sequential application of biotinylated horse anti-goat IgG (1:200 in nonimmune block; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and avidin-biotin-peroxidase conjugate (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), followed by the substrate diaminobenzidine (Dako) for between 2 and 10 min. Sections were counterstained with Harris' hematoxylin (Sigma), dehydrated and mounted from Histosol with DPX mounting medium (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, UK). Immunostaining was assessed semi-quantitatively by two independent assessors, blind to the identity of subject groups. Blinding was not possible in the assessment of ectopic tissue potentially biasing the results. Staining intensity and heterogeneity for each endometrial compartment (epithelium, stroma, leukocytes and vasculature) was assessed and allocated a score between 0 and 4 where 0 = no stain, 1 = faint staining, 2 = moderate staining, 3 = strong staining and 4 = maximally intense staining.

Statistical analysis

None of the data were normally distributed and therefore non-parametric tests were used. The direct comparison of two samples from different patients was conducted with the Mann-Whitney U-test. The direct comparison of two samples (eutopic and ectopic endometrium) from the same patient was conducted with the Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Ranks Test. For the relationship between two independent interval variables (staining intensities for CCL16 and CCL21) the rank correlation coefficient was used. The significance level was set at a P value of < 0.05.

Results

Laser capture microdissection

Laser capture technology enabled the isolation of glandular epithelial cells from mid-secretory phase endometrial tissue of control and endometriosis subjects (n = 4 per group) (Figure 1A and 1B). For each subject, 150 – 600 glands were microdissected from 10 to 20 individual frozen tissue sections of 10 μm in thickness. Extraction of RNA of the LCM cells produced RNA yields of varying quantities ranging from 0.18 ng to 1.15 ng per glandular structure isolated (Figure 1C). The positive amplification of the epithelial-specific gene product, Htra3, ascertained that glandular epithelial cells had been specifically isolated and RNA integrity retained (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

Laser capture microdissection. (A) Frozen section of eutopic endometrial tissue from an endometriosis patient (mid-secretory phase) stained with HistoGene™. The epithelial glands were isolated with laser capture microdissection (LCM). (B) Tissue section following LCM demonstrating the precision in dissection and cell capture. (C) RNA yields from microdissected glands expressed as total RNA (ng) per number of gland from each tissue sample. Microdissected glandular RNA samples from control (C, n = 4) and endometriosis (E, n = 4) tissues were separately, reverse transcribed and a uterine epithelial cell-specific gene (HtrA3) was amplified using PCR to assess RNA quality (insert).

Gene array

To provide a global chemokine expression profile in eutopic endometrium from normal women and endometriosis patients, and to overcome patient to patient variability, total RNA extracted from LCM glandular epithelial cells was pooled from 4 individuals in each group (Table 1). Of 77 genes profiled on the cDNA gene arrays, expression of 22 chemokine and receptors were reproducibly (two separate runs) upregulated in pooled endometrium from women with endometriosis compared with controls (Table 2). Downregulation of expression was observed in 11 genes; however only 2 of these demonstrated a 2-fold or higher difference when compared to expression levels in normal endometrium (Table 3). For many upregulated genes, fold increase was not quantifiable, due to the lack of detectable expression in the control pool compared to very high expression in the endometriosis pool. In contrast, the fold-change quantified in genes which were downregulated was relatively small, with the largest difference being a 2.5-fold decrease in CCL28 expression.
Table 2

Upregulated genes in glandular epithelial cells of eutopic endometrium: endometriosis compared with controls.

Regulated gene for chemokines

Common name

Fold change

Associa-ted with receptors

Functional expression on immune cells

Gene accession

CCL15

HCC2

++

CCR1, CCR3

T-lymphocytes, monocytes

NM_004167

CCL16

HCC4

++

CCR1

Monocytes

NM_004590

CCL18

PARC

++

unknown

T-lymphocytes

NM_002988

CCL19

MIP-3β

++

CCR7

T-cell and B-lymphocytes.

NM_006274

CCL21

6Ckine

++

CCR7

Leukocytes, endothelial cells

NM_002989

CCL22

MDC

2.2 (1.6, 2.9)

CCR4

Leukocytes, natural killer cells

NM_002990

CCL23

MPIF-1

++

CCR1

T-cell lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils

NM_001295

CXCL5

ENA-78

2.1 (1.5, 2.6)

CXCR2

Works in conjunction with IL8 to activate neutrophils

NM_002994

CXCL8

IL8

2.2 (1.5, 2.5)

CXCR2

T-cell lymphocyte and neutrophil chemoattractant

NM_000584

CXCL10

I-P10

++

CXCR3

Monocytes, natural killer cells, T-cell lymphocytes

NM_001565

CXCL13

BCA-1

3.0 (1.9, 3.7)

CXCR5

B- and T-cell lymphocytes

NM_006419

XCL1

lymphotactin

++

XCR1

B- and T-cell lymphocytes

NM_005283

XCL2

SCM-1β

++

XCR1

T-cell lymphocytes

NM_003175

CX3CL1

Fractalkine

16.4 (2.2, 30.6)

CX3CR1

T cells, monocytes

NM_002996

Receptors

  

Ligand

  

CCR1/CD234

Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC)

2.2 (1.5, 2.6)

CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL8

Erythrocytes, leukocytes, Endothelial cells

NM_002036

CCR10

GPR2

++

CCL27

T-cells

NM_016602

CXCR2

IL-8Rβ

++

CXCL8

Neutrophils

NM_001557

CXCR4

fusin

++

CXCL12

T-and B-cell lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages

NM_003467

CXCR5

BLR1

2.5 (2, 2.8)

CXCL13

B- and T-cell lymphocytes

NM_001716

CXCR6

TYMSTR

5.8 (4.1, 7.5)

CXCL16

T-cell lymphocytes

NM_006564

XCR1

GPR55

++

XCL1 XCL2

T cells, mast cells, monocytes, macrophages

NM_005283

LTB4R*

GPR16

1.9 (1.4, 42.2)

leukotriene B4 (LTB4)

Neutrophils

NM_181657

++ Fold upregulation > 20 fold; in most cases cDNA hybridization signal was undetectable in control arrays but clearly detectable in endometriosis arrays. Where difference in expression was quantifiable and variable between the 2 arrays, fold change is presented in parentheses.

*not a chemokine receptor, is a potent chemoattractant and survival factor for neutrophilic polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes (59, 60)

Table 3

Downregulated genes in glandular epithelial cells of eutopic endometrium: endometriosis compared with controls.

Regulated gene for chemokines

Common name

Fold change

Associated receptor

Functional expression on immune cells

Gene accession

CCL28

MEC

2.5 (1.1 – 1.7)

CCR10

T-cell lymphocytes, Eosinophils,

NM_019846

CCL4

MIP1β/ACT-2

2.0 (1.3 – 3.3)

CCR6

B- and T-cell lymphocytes, neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes

NM_002984

Real-time RT PCR

To verify the results obtained from cDNA array experiments and to establish the variability between individuals, two candidate genes (CCL16 and CCL21, also known as HCC-4 and 6C-kine respectively) that had not previously been identified as associated with endometriosis, were selected for further analysis using quantitative real-time RT-PCR on individual unamplified RNA samples of glands from eutopic tissue (patients and controls: n = 3 subjects per cohort). All 3 samples used for each cohort, in this analysis, were included in cDNA array analysis. Selection of the candidate genes was based on the marked upregulation of mRNA levels on the cDNA arrays. These chemokines have been previously characterised in normal cycling human endometrium in our laboratory [27], the mRNA for CCL16 and CCL21 is maximal in entire endometrium during the mid-secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. In this study, mRNA expression for CCL16 was below the detection limit in the LCM glands from all 3 controls and 1 of the 3 endometriosis patient samples (Figure 2A). Where detectable, expression levels ranged from 0.01 – 0.05 fg/pg 18S RNA. Overall there was a significant elevation in eutopic endometrial glandular CCL16 expression in women with endometriosis compared to controls (n = 3; P = 0.049).
Figure 2

Real-time PCR quantitation of CCL16 and CCL21 mRNA expression in control and endometriosis subjects. (A) mRNA expression of CCL16 and (B) CCL21 was measured in glandular RNA samples from individuals in control (■) and endometriosis cohorts (■, , ▲ representing the 3 patients' individual data). Data is presented as relative units where chemokine expression has been normalized to 18S RNA expression for each sample (n = 3 per group, RT-PCR performed in duplicates). The average value for each subject group is indicated with a horizontal line. * denotes a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.049, Mann-Whitney U-test).

CCL21 mRNA was more abundant than that of CCL16 and was markedly elevated in eutopic glands from one endometriosis patient (mean, 0.61 fg/pg 18S RNA) (Figure 2B). The levels of CCL21 observed in the remaining endometriosis patients ranged from 0.02 – 0.19 fg/pg 18S RNA. In the control cohort, CCL21 mRNA expression ranged between 0.003 – 0.045 fg/pg 18S RNA. These combined data clearly show that the expression of CCL16 and CCL21 is disturbed at least in some patients with endometriosis. In women without endometriosis the expression was consistently low.

Chemokine immunohistochemistry in control and endometriosis eutopic tissue

Since the findings from the cDNA array and real time RT-PCR experiments supported a role for CCL21 and CCL16 in at least some women with endometriosis, immunohistochemistry was performed to establish the presence and cellular location of the protein for these 2 chemokines in eutopic and ectopic endometrial samples. Immunoreactivity for both chemokines was evident in glandular epithelial cells but absent from stromal cells and was overall in accord with the real-time PCR quantitation. CCL16 protein was detected in the glandular epithelium of all but one of the 32 tissues examined and CCL21 protein was evident in glands in all tissues. However, staining was variable between individual tissues even within groups (Figure 3). No significant differences were detected for either CCL16 or CCL21 between mean glandular staining intensity in endometrium from normal women compared with eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis (Figure 3). The staining pattern in some glands was predominantly apical (Figures 4A–C) suggesting secretion of the chemokine into the uterine lumen. Within each tissue, all glands were equally stained and staining was present in all cells in each gland (Figures 4A–D).
Figure 3

Immunostaining for CCL16 and CCL21 in eutopic and ectopic tissue from control and endometriosis subjects. Staining intensity for (A) CCL16 and (B) CCL21 in glandular epithelium of normal mid secretory endometrium (n = 12) (■) and in glandular epithelium in paired eutopic (▲) and ectopic () endometrium from women with endometriosis (n = 10), also in the mid-secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. Open symbols represent subjects whose samples were used in the gene array study. Staining intensity was scored on a scale of 0 (no stain) to 4 (intense stain). Scores are shown for individual samples. Bars represent mean values. * denotes a statistical difference between 2 samples from the same patients (P = 0.047, Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Ranks Test).

Figure 4

Immunostaining for CCL16 and CCL21. Representative tissues immunostained for CCL16 (A, C, E) and CCL21 (B, D, F). CCL16 and CCL21 staining, in control eutopic endometrial tissue (A, B), eutopic tissue (C, D), and matched ectopic lesions (E, F) from the same endometriosis patient. Leukocytes stained for CCL21 are shown in the insert in (F). (G, H) Endometrial sections with non-immune IgG substituted for the primary antibodies, as negative controls. Scale bars represent 200 μm.

Chemokine immunohistochemistry in matched eutopic and ectopic endometriosis tissue

Comparisons were also made between the immunostaining in matched eutopic and ectopic endometrium in endometriosis patients. Positive staining was present in ectopic tissue for both CCL16 and CCL21 (Figures 3 and 4). In both cases, chemokines specifically localised in epithelial cells of glandular structures in ectopic lesions derived from ovarian, uterosacral ligaments and peritoneal sites. In some ectopic peritoneal lesions, large irregular cyst-like structures were present and strong staining for both CCL16 and CCL21 was apparent in glandular epithelial cells and in secretions within the cyst. In other peritoneal lesions, but more commonly, in ovarian lesions, glandular formation was very structured, closely resembling eutopic tissue morphology. Very strong staining was seen in glands in some ectopic lesions (one lesion for CCL16 (Figure 4E) and three for CCL21). Overall glandular staining intensity was higher in ectopic tissue than in eutopic tissue and this reached significance (P = 0.047) for CCL16. Importantly, there was a high degree of correlation between staining for CCL16 and CCL21 in each sample (Rank correlation coefficient R = 0.81, P < 0.001).

Leukocytes were evident in most tissues and stained strongly for CCL16 and CCL21: these were highly abundant in some lesions (Figure 4F insert) emphasizing the importance of laser capture microdissection in this study. Inclusion of leukocytes in the original cDNA array analysis would have skewed the data. As negative controls, endometrial sections with non-immune IgG substituted for the primary antibodies, demonstrated no localised staining (Figures 4G–H).

Discussion

This study used laser capture dissection and pathway-specific gene array analysis to determine chemokines that may be expressed at elevated levels during the mid-secretory phase in the glandular epithelium of the endometrium of women with endometriosis when compared to controls. Using pooled samples, 22 genes were markedly upregulated while only 2 genes were slightly downregulated in the endometriosis cohort. Real-time PCR verified that there were differences in the mRNA encoding CCL16 and CCL21, the two chemokines selected for further study, but that there was considerable heterogeneity in expression in individual endometriosis subjects. This heterogeneity was confirmed at the protein level. Furthermore, immunoreactive CCL16 was more intensely stained in epithelium in ectopic endometriosis lesions compared with matched eutopic tissue, and there was a similar trend for CCL21. Indeed, there was high correlation between staining for these two chemokines in each sample. This data thus adds CCL16 and CCL21 to the chemokines found to be elevated in endometriosis supporting a role for chemokines in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Given the small patient cohort assessed, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn: however the current study provides preliminary data on the involvement of previously unidentified chemokines in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Despite the technical difficulties in obtaining sufficient quantities of mRNA with LCM, the current study clearly highlights the importance of laser capture microdissection for the accurate analysis of cell-specific gene expression in heterogeneous tissues such as endometrium. In this tissue, epithelial cells are the predominant source of chemokines [27], many of which are maximally expressed in the mid secretory phase. However, both decidualized stromal cells (found only in late secretory endometrium) and leukocytes are variably abundant in endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle and are additional sources of chemokines. By isolation and initial analysis of glandular epithelium from endometrium, we have been able to identify epithelial-derived chemokines and have excluded the variability and likely spurious results that would have been caused by the presence of infiltrating leukocytes, which also produce chemokines [27].

Laser capture microdissection and RNA amplification technology have been used previously for gene expression profiling of the glandular epithelium in endometriosis patients and aberrant expression was noted in genes relating to oxidative stress and focal adhesion and in genes linked to Wnt, PI3K and RAS/RAF/MAPK signalling [3335]. As there are no reports of chemokine expression profiling in endometriosis, the present study is the first to provide a comprehensive list of potential candidate chemokines and receptors in laser-captured glandular epithelium in eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis.

Selected chemokines identified as being of potential interest from the array analysis were further examined by semi-quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Importantly, individual samples were assessed at this stage, to establish not only the variability between the two study groups, but also that between individuals. In laser captured glands from control subjects, CCL16 and CCL21 mRNA were uniformly undetectable or at low levels. In contrast, in women with endometriosis, eutopic CCL16 and CCL21 mRNA levels were increased in some subjects but with significant patient-to-patient variability. This variability could be attributed both to the heterogeneity of the disease, both in cause and phenotype and also to differences in endometrial morphology from individual to individual. Subsequent immunohistochemical examination of the protein however, showed somewhat different results. More tissues were used for this analysis and staining intensities of the two chemokines in the glands were very variable between individuals. Interestingly the major differences in protein were seen between eutopic and ectopic tissues in the same women, with overall higher staining intensity in ectopic tissue. The discrepancy between mRNA and protein levels may reflect either rapid clearance of mRNA or the stability of immunoreactive protein.

The precise roles of CCL16 and CCL21 in the endometrium are currently unknown, but there is considerable information regarding their functions in immunological disease and cancer. CCL16 is specifically chemotactic for monocytes [3638]. It increases antigen presentation of macrophages, enhances T-cell cytotoxicity and stimulates their production of a number of inflammatory-type cytokines (IL-1β, TNFα, IL-12) [37]. A recent study showed that CCL16 stimulated cell migration of human osteogenic sarcoma cells expressing CCR1 [39]. It is also found to be overexpressed in synovial tissue from patients with inflammatory joint disease [40]. CCL16 has low sequence homology (30%) to other CCR1-dependent chemokines, and significant structural differences, particularly in the N-terminal region required for receptor activation [41]. This may explain why CCL16, although binding to a non-specific receptor, triggers a unique signalling cascade and provides evidence of differential regulatory mechanisms employed by chemokines to illicit cellular responses.

CCL21 has known functions in homeostasis, in the reconstitution of lymphocytes and in immuno-surveillance [42]. It activates T-cells and lymphocytes [43], attracts both T- and B-cells and dendritic cells (DC) to lymphoid tissues through its receptor CCR7. It is essential for the priming of naive T-cells in the initiation phase of the immune response [44, 45]. CCL21 has also been implicated in the abnormal adhesion and migration of CD34+ cells in leukemia [46]. How an elevation of CCL21 may contribute to endometriosis is not certain. However, elevations in expression of this normally constitutive chemokine have been reported in cases of chronic inflammation/pathology and autoimmune diseases where a role in inappropriate recruitment of naïve T-cells to non-lymphoid tissue has been proposed [47, 48]. Interestingly, endometriosis has been likened to an autoimmune disease [49].

In addition to their upregulation in eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis, examination of CCL16 and CCL21 in ectopic tissues demonstrated a significant increase in protein relative to expression in eutopic tissue derived from the same individual. A similar observation has been documented recently with the induction of endometriosis in a baboon model with no prior disease [50]. Following the inoculation of endometriosis tissue into the peritoneal cavity of the animal, a concomitant increase in cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61) gene expression was measured both in eutopic and ectopic tissues. This observation suggests it is the presence of the endometriotic lesions, which directly influences the local environment in the endometrium. In our immunolocalization study of the ectopic lesions, typical large cyst-like structures containing much cellular debris/secretion strongly stained for the chemokines, suggesting secretion of chemokines apically from the epithelial cells. However, the level of chemokine expression did not correlate with the severity of the endometriosis.

CXCL8 (IL-8), another chemokine whose mRNA was increased in endometrial glands from women with endometriosis in our array study, has previously been studied in depth with regard to a role in endometriosis [51], further substantiating our gene array results. CXCL-8 levels are elevated in peritoneal fluid in women with endometriosis [5153]. Furthermore, glandular epithelial cell localisation and upregulation of immunoreactive CXCR1 and CXCR2, which bind CXCL8, has been demonstrated in eutopic and ectopic tissue sections from endometriosis patients when compared to controls [54].

The data from this pathway-specific gene array thus provides new evidence for the broad dysregulation of chemokine expression in both eutopic endometrial epithelium and ectopic lesions of women with endometriosis. The glandular chemokines which were upregulated are known to recruit and activate natural killer cells, T and B lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils. Collectively, such upregulation of chemokines and receptors, in endometriosis patients may demonstrate an increased ability of the endometrium and endometriotic lesions to recruit leukocytes and thus exacerbate the inflammatory response.

Aberrant chemokine expression in the uterine lumen may interfere with blastocyst implantation and hence provide one rationale for the infertility that is often associated with endometriosis. The invasive trophoblast and the eutopic endometrium strongly express chemokine receptors (CCR1, CCR10, CCR5, CCR7, CXCR4, CXCR6 and XCR) and chemokines contribute to the positioning, adhesion and migration of trophoblast [5558]. Chemokines also have non-immune functions during tissue remodelling and in many diseases through upregulation of adhesion molecule expression, angiogenesis, cell proliferation and motility [59]. The higher abundance of chemokines in endometriosis may facilitate tissue adherence of retrograde menstrual tissue, increase epithelial cell proliferation and remodelling to form glandular structures, and stimulate tissue breakdown and bleeding. There is some functional evidence in support of a role of chemokines in increasing tissue adherence. In a recent study, treatment of mice with a broad-spectrum chemokine inhibitor (NR58-3.14.3) reduced the size and number of post-operative intra-peritoneal adhesions [60] and in particular, a reduction in CD45+ inflammatory cell accumulation within the adhesions was observed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current study has identified potential new candidate molecules from the chemokine family that may be important in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. The use of laser capture microdissection was fundamental to identify only those chemokines and chemokine receptors derived from the epithelial compartment. Further, two novel candidate molecules, CCL16 and CCL21, not previously linked to endometriosis have been validated. This data supports the hypothesis that the inflammatory phenotype observed in endometriosis may involve the activation of chemokine cascades.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by grants from the Mayne Nickless Women's Health Fellowship by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ASM) and the Monash Medical Faculty Grant (LR). LAS, RLJ and NJH were supported by the NHMRC of Australia (388901 and 241000).

We are grateful to the patients who generously consented for their tissues for this study. We are also grateful to Dr B Vollenhoven, Dr A. Lawrence, and Dr M. Lawrence, for their assistance in the collection of biopsy material.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research,
(2)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,, Monash University,
(3)
Division of Human Development,, Academic Unit of Child Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital Research Floor,
(4)
Wellington School of Medicine,, Otago University,

References

  1. Lebovic DI, Mueller MD, Taylor RN: Immunobiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2001, 75: 1-10. 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01630-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tseng JF, Ryan IP, Milam TD, Murai JT, Schriock ED, Landers DV, Taylor RN: Interleukin-6 secretion in vitro is up-regulated in ectopic and eutopic endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996, 81: 1118-1122. 10.1210/jc.81.3.1118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rier SE, Parsons AK, Becker JL: Altered interleukin-6 production by peritoneal leukocytes from patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1994, 61: 294-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zeyneloglu HB, Senturk LM, Seli E, Bahtiyar OM, Olive DL, Arici A: The peritoneal fluid levels of interleukin-12 in women with endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998, 39: 152-156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moser B, Loetscher P: Lymphocyte traffic control by chemokines. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2: 123-128. 10.1038/84219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ryan IP, Tseng JF, Schriock ED, Khorram O, Landers DV, Taylor RN: Interleukin-8 concentrations are elevated in peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1995, 63: 929-932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Akoum A, Lemay A, Brunet C, Hebert J: Secretion of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 by cytokine-stimulated endometrial cells of women with endometriosis. Le groupe d'investigation en gynecologie. Fertil Steril. 1995, 63: 322-328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Akoum A, Lemay A, McColl S, Turcot-Lemay L, Maheux R: Elevated concentration and biologic activity of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in the peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1996, 66: 17-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zeyneloglu HB, Senturk LM, Seli E, Oral E, Olive DL, Arici A: The role of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in intraperitoneal adhesion formation. Hum Reprod. 1998, 13: 1194-1199. 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Luther SA, Cyster JG: Chemokines as regulators of T cell differentiation. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2: 102-107. 10.1038/84205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Sozzani S: Chemokines and chemokine receptors during activation and deactivation of monocytes and dendritic cells and in amplification of Th1 versus Th2 responses. Int J Clin Lab Res. 1998, 28: 77-82. 10.1007/s005990050023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sozzani S, Vecchi A, Locati M, Sica A: Chemokines in the recruitment and shaping of the leukocyte infiltrate of tumors. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004, 14: 155-160. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2003.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Boddeke EW: Involvement of chemokines in pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001, 429: 115-119. 10.1016/S0014-2999(01)01311-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Barcz E, Kaminski P, Marianowski L: Role of cytokines in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med Sci Monit. 2000, 6: 1042-1046.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia-Velasco JA, Arici A: Interleukin-8 stimulates the adhesion of endometrial stromal cells to fibronectin. Fertil Steril. 1999, 72: 336-340. 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00223-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandis AZ, Prasad A, Band H, Klosel R, Ganju RK: Regulation of CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis and chemoinvasion of breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 157-167. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Scotton CJ, Wilson JL, Scott K, Stamp G, Wilbanks GD, Fricker S, Bridger G, Balkwill FR: Multiple actions of the chemokine CXCL12 on epithelial tumor cells in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 5930-5938.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mareel M, Leroy A: Clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects of cancer invasion. Physiol Rev. 2003, 83: 337-376.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee BC, Lee TH, Avraham S, Avraham HK: Involvement of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha in breast cancer cell migration through human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2004, 2: 327-338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin YJ, Lai MD, Lei HY, Wing LY: Neutrophils and macrophages promote angiogenesis in the early stage of endometriosis in a mouse model. Endocrinology. 2006, 147: 1278-1286. 10.1210/en.2005-0790.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Khorram O, Taylor RN, Ryan IP, Schall TJ, Landers DV: Peritoneal fluid concentrations of the cytokine RANTES correlate with the severity of endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993, 169: 1545-1549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Arici A, Tazuke SI, Attar E, Kliman HJ, Olive DL: Interleukin-8 concentration in peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis and modulation of interleukin-8 expression in human mesothelial cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996, 2: 40-45. 10.1093/molehr/2.1.40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gazvani MR, Christmas S, Quenby S, Kirwan J, Johnson PM, Kingsland CR: Peritoneal fluid concentrations of interleukin-8 in women with endometriosis: relationship to stage of disease. Hum Reprod. 1998, 13: 1957-1961. 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1957.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Szamatowicz J, Laudanski P, Tomaszewska I, Szamatowicz M: Chemokine growth-regulated-alpha: a possible role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2002, 16: 137-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho HN, Wu MY, Yang YS: Peritoneal cellular immunity and endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997, 38: 400-412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hannan NJ, Jones RL, Critchley HO, Kovacs GJ, Rogers PA, Affandi B, Salamonsen LA: Coexpression of fractalkine and its receptor in normal human endometrium and in endometrium from users of progestin-only contraception supports a role for fractalkine in leukocyte recruitment and endometrial remodeling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 6119-6129. 10.1210/jc.2003-031379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones RL, Hannan NJ, Kaitu'u TJ, Zhang J, Salamonsen LA: Identification of chemokines important for leukocyte recruitment to the human endometrium at the times of embryo implantation and menstruation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 6155-6167. 10.1210/jc.2004-0507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kyama CM, Overbergh L, Debrock S, Valckx D, Vander Perre S, Meuleman C, Mihalyi A, Mwenda JM, Mathieu C, D'Hooghe TM: Increased peritoneal and endometrial gene expression of biologically relevant cytokines and growth factors during the menstrual phase in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2006, 85: 1667-1675. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Medicine ASR: Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997, 67: 817-821. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81391-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Noyes RW: Dating of Endometrial Biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975, 122: 262-263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sluka P, O'Donnell L, Stanton PG: Stage-specific expression of genes associated with rat spermatogenesis: characterization by laser-capture microdissection and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biol Reprod. 2002, 67: 820-828. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.004879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nie GY, Li Y, Minoura H, Batten L, Ooi GT, Findlay JK, Salamonsen LA: A novel serine protease of the mammalian HtrA family is up-regulated in mouse uterus coinciding with placentation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003, 9: 279-290. 10.1093/molehr/gag036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Vaurs-Barriere C, Pouly JL, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Penault-Llorca F, Dechelotte P, Dastugue B, Okamura K, Mage G: DNA microarray analysis of gene expression profiles in deep endometriosis using laser capture microdissection. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004, 10: 719-728. 10.1093/molehr/gah097.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Vaurs-Barriere C, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Dastugue B, Mage G: DNA microarray analysis of gene expression in eutopic endometrium from patients with deep endometriosis using laser capture microdissection. Fertil Steril. 2005, 84 Suppl 2: 1180-1190. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu Y, Kajdacsy-Balla A, Strawn E, Basir Z, Halverson G, Jailwala P, Wang Y, Wang X, Ghosh S, Guo SW: Transcriptional characterizations of differences between eutopic and ectopic endometrium. Endocrinology. 2006, 147: 232-246. 10.1210/en.2005-0426.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hedrick JA, Helms A, Vicari A, Zlotnik A: Characterization of a novel CC chemokine, HCC-4, whose expression is increased by interleukin-10. Blood. 1998, 91: 4242-4247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cappello P, Caorsi C, Bosticardo M, De Angelis S, Novelli F, Forni G, Giovarelli M: CCL16/LEC powerfully triggers effector and antigen-presenting functions of macrophages and enhances T cell cytotoxicity. J Leukoc Biol. 2004, 75: 135-142. 10.1189/jlb.0403146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakayama T, Kato Y, Hieshima K, Nagakubo D, Kunori Y, Fujisawa T, Yoshie O: Liver-expressed chemokine/CC chemokine ligand 16 attracts eosinophils by interacting with histamine H4 receptor. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 2078-2083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim IS, Jang SW, Sung HJ, Lee JS, Ko J: Differential CCR1-mediated chemotaxis signaling induced by human CC chemokine HCC-4/CCL16 in HOS cells. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579: 6044-6048. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Haringman JJ, Smeets TJ, Reinders-Blankert P, Tak PP: Chemokine and chemokine receptor expression in paired peripheral blood mononuclear cells and synovial tissue of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and reactive arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006, 65: 294-300. 10.1136/ard.2005.037176.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Youn BS, Zhang S, Broxmeyer HE, Antol K, Fraser MJ, Hangoc G, Kwon BS: Isolation and characterization of LMC, a novel lymphocyte and monocyte chemoattractant human CC chemokine, with myelosuppressive activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 247: 217-222. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nagira M, Imai T, Hieshima K, Kusuda J, Ridanpaa M, Takagi S, Nishimura M, Kakizaki M, Nomiyama H, Yoshie O: Molecular cloning of a novel human CC chemokine secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokine that is a potent chemoattractant for lymphocytes and mapped to chromosome 9p13. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 19518-19524. 10.1074/jbc.272.31.19518.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Christopherson KW, Campbell JJ, Hromas RA: Transgenic overexpression of the CC chemokine CCL21 disrupts T-cell migration. Blood. 2001, 98: 3562-3568. 10.1182/blood.V98.13.3562.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Flanagan K, Moroziewicz D, Kwak H, Horig H, Kaufman HL: The lymphoid chemokine CCL21 costimulates naive T cell expansion and Th1 polarization of non-regulatory CD4+ T cells. Cell Immunol. 2004, 231: 75-84. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2004.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kikuchi K, Yanagawa Y, Onoe K: CCR7 ligand-enhanced phagocytosis of various antigens in mature dendritic cells-time course and antigen distribution different from phagocytosis in immature dendritic cells. Microbiol Immunol. 2005, 49: 535-544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jongen-Lavrencic M, Salesse S, Delwel R, Verfaillie CM: BCR/ABL-mediated downregulation of genes implicated in cell adhesion and motility leads to impaired migration toward CCR7 ligands CCL19 and CCL21 in primary BCR/ABL-positive cells. Leukemia. 2005, 19: 373-380. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403626.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Grant AJ, Goddard S, Ahmed-Choudhury J, Reynolds G, Jackson DG, Briskin M, Wu L, Hubscher SG, Adams DH: Hepatic expression of secondary lymphoid chemokine (CCL21) promotes the development of portal-associated lymphoid tissue in chronic inflammatory liver disease. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160: 1445-1455.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Bonacchi A, Petrai I, Defranco RM, Lazzeri E, Annunziato F, Efsen E, Cosmi L, Romagnani P, Milani S, Failli P, Batignani G, Liotta F, Laffi G, Pinzani M, Gentilini P, Marra F: The chemokine CCL21 modulates lymphocyte recruitment and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2003, 125: 1060-1076. 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)01194-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Matarese G, De Placido G, Nikas Y, Alviggi C: Pathogenesis of endometriosis: natural immunity dysfunction or autoimmune disease?. Trends Mol Med. 2003, 9: 223-228. 10.1016/S1471-4914(03)00051-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Gashaw I, Hastings JM, Jackson KS, Winterhager E, T. FA: Induced Endometriosis in the Baboon (Papio anubis) Increases the Expression of the Proangiogenic Factor CYR61 (CCN1) in Eutopic and Ectopic Endometria. Biol Reprod. 2006Google Scholar
  51. Arici A: Local cytokines in endometrial tissue: the role of interleukin-8 in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 955: 101-9; discussion 118, 396-406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Iwabe T, Harada T, Tsudo T, Tanikawa M, Onohara Y, Terakawa N: Pathogenetic significance of increased levels of interleukin-8 in the peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1998, 69: 924-930. 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00049-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Arici A, Seli E, Senturk LM, Gutierrez LS, Oral E, Taylor HS: Interleukin-8 in the human endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998, 83: 1783-1787. 10.1210/jc.83.5.1783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ulukus M, Ulukus EC, Seval Y, Zheng W, Arici A: Expression of interleukin-8 receptors in endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005, 20: 794-801. 10.1093/humrep/deh675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Dominguez F, Galan A, Martin JJ, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C: Hormonal and embryonic regulation of chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR4, CCR5 and CCR2B in the human endometrium and the human blastocyst. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003, 9: 189-198. 10.1093/molehr/gag024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Hannan NJ, Jones RL, White CA, Salamonsen LA: The Chemokines, CX3CL1, CCL14, and CCL4, Promote Human Trophoblast Migration at the Feto-Maternal Interface. Biol Reprod. 2006Google Scholar
  57. Drake PM, Red-Horse K, Fisher SJ: Reciprocal chemokine receptor and ligand expression in the human placenta: implications for cytotrophoblast differentiation. Dev Dyn. 2004, 229: 877-885. 10.1002/dvdy.10477.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sato Y, Higuchi T, Yoshioka S, Tatsumi K, Fujiwara H, Fujii S: Trophoblasts acquire a chemokine receptor, CCR1, as they differentiate towards invasive phenotype. Development. 2003, 130: 5519-5532. 10.1242/dev.00729.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Banas B, Wornle M, Berger T, Nelson PJ, Cohen CD, Kretzler M, Pfirstinger J, Mack M, Lipp M, Grone HJ, Schlondorff D: Roles of SLC/CCL21 and CCR7 in human kidney for mesangial proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and tissue homeostasis. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 4301-4307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Berkkanoglu M, Zhang L, Ulukus M, Cakmak H, Kayisli UA, Kursun S, Arici A: Inhibition of chemokines prevents intraperitoneal adhesions in mice. Hum Reprod. 2005, 20: 3047-3052. 10.1093/humrep/dei182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Gaudreault E, Stankova J, Rola-Pleszczynski M: Involvement of leukotriene B4 receptor 1 signaling in platelet-activating factor-mediated neutrophil degranulation and chemotaxis. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2005, 75: 25-34. 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2004.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stankova J, Turcotte S, Harris J, Rola-Pleszczynski M: Modulation of leukotriene B4 receptor-1 expression by dexamethasone: potential mechanism for enhanced neutrophil survival. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 3570-3576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chand et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement