Open Access

The C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase variant and third trimester obstetrical complications in women with unexplained elevations of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein

  • Natalie K Björklund1,
  • Jane A Evans1, 2, 3,
  • Cheryl R Greenberg1, 2,
  • Lorne E Seargeant1, 2,
  • Carol E Schneider4 and
  • Bernard N Chodirker1, 2Email author
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology20042:65

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-65

Received: 27 May 2004

Accepted: 07 September 2004

Published: 07 September 2004

Abstract

Introduction

The C677T MTHFR variant has been associated with the same third trimester pregnancy complications as seen in women who have elevations of maternal serum α-fetoprotein (MSAFP). We hypothesized that these women with third trimester pregnancy complications and MSAFP elevations would have an increased frequency of the variant compared to an abnormal study control group (women with MSAFP elevations without pregnancy complications) as well as to normal population controls.

Methods

Women who had unexplained elevations of MSAFP in pregnancy were ascertained retrospectively. The frequency of the C677T MTHFR variant among those women with unexplained elevations of MSAFP who had experienced later pregnancy complications was compared to that of women with unexplained elevations of MSAFP without complications as well as to that of the previously established Manitoba frequency.

Results

Women who had complications of pregnancy and an unexplained MSAFP elevation had a higher allele frequency for the C677T MTHFR variant (q = 0.36,) compared to women with MSAFP elevations and normal pregnancy outcomes (q = 0.25, OR 1.73 95% CI 1.25–2.37, p = 0.03). The frequency was also higher than that of the population controls (q= 0.25, OR 1.70 95% CI 1.11–2.60, p = 0.007). The frequency in women with MSAFP elevations without pregnancy complications was not significantly different from that of the population controls (p = 0.41).

Conclusion

Women with unexplained elevations of MSAFP and who experience complications in later pregnancy are more likely to have one or two alleles of the C677T MTHFR variant.

Background

Significant elevations of amniotic fluid and maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) have been shown to be associated with spina bifida and other neural tube defects (NTD). The province of Manitoba, Canada offers province-wide midtrimester MSAFP screening to all pregnant women. It has been recognized that some pregnant women with midtrimester unexplained elevations of MSAFP [1, 2].

Increased total plasma homocysteine alters placental function and has been associated with the same complications that are associated with unexplained elevated MSAFP [37]. The C677T MTHFR variant has also been associated with complications of pregnancy in some, but not all, studies [810] C677T MTHFR may therefore contribute to complications of pregnancy by elevating serum homocysteine. Poor placental function could result in both an unexplained elevation of MSAFP and complications of pregnancy. We therefore hypothesized that women with third trimester pregnancy complications and MSAFP elevations (cases) would have an increased frequency of the variant compared to the Manitoba population (population controls) or women with MSAFP elevations without pregnancy complications (study controls) if they had low folate intake.

Methods

Background to methods

In a small pilot study of 32 couples, we found that women who had an unexplained elevation of MSAFP and a normal midtrimester fetal ultrasound, and their partners, had a significantly increased C677T MTHFR frequency compared to Manitoba newborns (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08–1.85, p = 0.012, two tailed) [11]. The newborn study that examined 977 anonymous consecutive neonatal screening blood spots showed that 36% of Manitoba newborns were heterozygous and 7% were homozygous for C677T MTHFR [12] (q = 0.25). Subsequently, on evaluation of the pregnancy outcomes of our pilot study women, we noted that, among eight women who had gone on to experience complications of pregnancy, the odds ratio for having the C677T MTHFR allele was 2.3 times higher than in the Manitoba population. However, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.151, two tailed) indicating the frequency was increased but, this could have been a random result.

Ascertainment and recruitment of study population

All pregnant women in Manitoba are eligible for routine serum screening through the voluntary MMSSP. In Manitoba, an elevation of MSAFP is defined as 2.3 multiples of the median (MOM) or greater. Candidates for inclusion in this study were women with an unexplained MSAFP elevation (i.e. not due to fetal anomalies, incorrect estimation of gestational age, previously unrecognized fetal demise, or multiple gestation) with either a complicated or uncomplicated pregnancy outcome. After appropriate approvals had been obtained from The University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board, review of the screening records began in 1999 and took three years. For a study using a two step consent to participate methodology administered by mail, the expected response rate (after excluding lost to follow-up) would be 20% [13]. Our goal was 1000 invitations. We anticipated this would result in approximately 120 participants. This would be double the minimum number of participants suggested by the power analysis we had conducted for the pilot study. To increase our response rate further, we added telephone follow-up for invited potential participants who were non-responders [14].

All screening records from 1995–1999 were reviewed, accounting for 783 invitations. Records for 2000–2002 were reviewed systematically as outcome information on each pregnancy became available to MMSSP. Records for 1990–1994 were then reviewed systematically in order to bring the total up to 1000. If a woman had more than one pregnancy with an elevation of MSAFP screened by the MMSSP, only the first pregnancy encountered in the retrospective review was used for the study. Previous or subsequent pregnancies were not included. Women with preexisting conditions known to influence pregnancy outcome, such as essential hypertension, and mothers of babies with major congenital anomalies were excluded. Eight women who had relinquished their babies for adoption or whose babies were placed in foster care were also excluded.

Women who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups for analysis. Cases were defined as women with pregnancies complicated by one of the complications previously shown to be associated with an unexplained elevation of MSAFP at midtrimester [2]. These include: intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (<10th percentile), pregnancy induced hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, retained placenta requiring manual delivery, abruptio placenta, premature delivery (<36 weeks gestation or requiring specialized neonatal care for prematurity) and unexplained fetal demise. Study controls were women with normal outcomes which were defined as those with delivery at term ≥ 36 weeks gestation), no complications of pregnancy, a normal placenta and a healthy baby. Definition of complications was based on ICDC-9 codes in the MMSSP outcome charts for each patient [15] which are then confirmed later by chart review for all those with a positive MMSSP result. All women ascertained as having unexplained MSAFP elevations and who fit the inclusion criteria above, were invited by letter to participate. The previously reported newborn study provided population control group data [12].

Study questionnaires

Women who agreed to participate in the study were mailed the appropriate questionnaires and blood requisitions. The questionnaire included a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) based on standard methodology but, modified to suit Manitoba residents and previously validated for this population by biochemical analysis during the pilot study [11, 16]. The survey included questions on vitamin supplement intake to determine preconceptional or prenatal supplementation as well as current use of vitamins. Dietary intake of folate and folic acid from supplements, and intake of the cofactors B12 and B6, were calculated from the FFQ for intake both during pregnancy and at the time of the study. A correction of an additional 0.1 mg for folic acid fortification that began in Canada in 1998 was included for pregnancies that began after fortification [17]. FFQ analyses were performed with the researcher blinded as to the status of the mother.

Laboratory analysis

Total plasma homocysteine, red blood cell folate, and serum folate were determined using established methodology [18, 19]. Samples were processed on site with clotting and separation by spinning. Sera was stored at 4°C during shipping to the central laboratory and until processing. DNA was extracted from whole blood and C677T MTHFR genotyping was performed using previously established methodology [11, 20, 21]. Genotyping and biochemical analyses were performed also blinded.

Statistical analysis

Chi-squared analysis (one tailed unless otherwise noted) was used for allele frequency. Comparisons of potentially confounding factors between the case group and the study control group were undertaken. Parametric data were analyzed with the Student's t test for difference between means with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Data not normally distributed were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test. Linear regression was used to test the validity of the dietary survey. A multivariate analysis included age, smoking, maternal weight at the time of MSAFP testing, presence of C677T MTHFR, gender and weight of infant, biochemical parameters, and FFQ results for folate, B12 and B6, both at the time of the survey and for during the pregnancy was undertaken. In order to avoid convergence due to the large number of variables, the analysis was completed in subsets of six variables. Variables with the higher association scores from these analyses were then combined for further testing in various combinations using stepwise multiple linear regression. Also linear regression analysis of each continuous variable with genotype results was performed. Corrections for multiple comparisons were included. Software used was NCSS Statistical Systems for Windows [22].

Results

Participation rates

Nine hundred and ninety four women were identified as eligible (342 cases and 652 controls). Of the 590 women successfully contacted, 130 (22%) agreed to participate (56 cases and 74 controls). Four hundred and four women were lost to follow-up. Cases were more likely to choose to participate than controls and this difference was significant (1.5, p = 0.030). There was no difference in the proportions of cases and controls that were lost to follow-up (p = 0.157). We had anticipated a 20% response rate and we achieved 24%.

Genotype results

Genotypes were available for 54 cases and 73 controls for this analysis. Results are summarized in Table 1. The allele frequency for the C677T MTHFR variant in the Manitoba population has been previously established to be q = 0.25. Women who had complications of pregnancy and an unexplained MSAFP elevation had a higher allele frequency for the C677T MTHFR variant (q = 0.36) compared to women with MSAFP elevations and normal pregnancy outcomes (q = 0.25, OR 1.73 95% CI 1.25–2.37, p = 0.03). The frequency was also higher than in the population controls (q = 0.25, OR 1.70 95% CI 1.11–2.60, p = 0.007). The frequency in women without pregnancy complications and MSAFP elevations (study controls) was not significantly different than that seen in population controls (p = 0.41).
Table 1

Comparison of allele frequency of C677T MTHFR between cases, study controls, and population controls.

Subjects

C/C (%)

C/T (%)

T/T (%)

Comparing to study controls* OR (95%CI)

Comparing to population* OR (95%CI)

Cases N = 54

21 (39)

27 (50)

6 (11)

1.73 (1.25–2.37) (p = 0.033)

1.70 (1.11–2.60) (p = 0.007)

Study Controls N = 73

40 (55)

30 (41)

3 (4)

~

0.98 (0.46–1.55) (p = 0.410)

Population N = 977

557 (57)

352 (36)

68 (7)

0.98 (0.46–1.55) (p = 0.410)

~

* χ2 comparison of allele frequency (total T and C) in each group, one tailed. Cases: women with unexplained elevations of MSAFP who had subsequent complications of pregnancy, (C = 69, T = 39) Controls: women who had unexplained elevations of MSAFP and no subsequent complications (C = 110, T = 36) Population controls were 977 newborns (C = 1466, T = 488) [12]. C/C = normal type, C/T = heterozygous for thermolabile variant, T/T = homozygous for thermolabile variant.

The case and study control groups included women at various stages of their child bearing years. Only one woman recruited as a control subject had a previous or subsequent pregnancy with an unexplained elevation of MSAFP and complications. She was a heterozygote for C677T MTHFR. No case subjects had a previous or subsequent pregnancy with an unexplained elevation of MSAFP and a normal outcome, but four case subjects had had a previous or subsequent pregnancy with complications after an elevated MSAFP. If the case versus control classification had been based on whether or not a woman had ever had a pregnancy with an unexplained elevation of MSAFP followed by complications, the association would still be present when compared to the population control (q = 0.3636, OR 1.72, 95%CI 1.27–2.61, p = 0.0055).

Biochemical results

Heterozygotes and homozygotes for C677T MTHFR had lower average values (r = 0.978, p = 0.019) for serum folate than those who did not have the variant. None of the women were deficient in either serum folate (defined as <7.0 nmol/L) or red blood cell folate (defined as <430 nmol/L RBC). There was no significant difference in mean homocysteine levels (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of the parametric characteristics of women with unexplained elevations of MSAFP according to those with and without complications of pregnancy

Characteristic

Mean Cases (SD)

Mean Controls (SD)

p value

MSAFP result

2.78 (± 0.62)

3.16 (± 3.76)

0.398

weeks gestation

17.1 (± 1.61)

16.9 (± 1.40)

0.432

μg/folate/day in pregnancy2

1216 (± 915)

1010 (± 892)

0.206

μg/folate/day at time of study2

557 (± 341)

523 (± 498)

0.588

erc folate (nmol/L RBC)

1234 (± 289)

1208 (± 317)

0.632

serum folate (nmol/L)

32.3 (± 5.80)

32.3 (± 5.71)

0.956

serum homocysteine (μmol/L)

7.8 (± 2.26)

8.4 (± 2.80)

0.246

μg B12/day in pregnancy2

12.4 (± 5.37)

13.4 (8.31)

0.488

μg B12/day at time of study2

8.9 (± 12.26)

8.6 (± 10.83)

0.899

mg B6/day in pregnancy2

8.4 (± 9.69)

7.2 (± 9.01)

0.461

mg B6/day at time of study2

6.0 (± 13.35)

5.5 (± 11.10)

0.792

mother's age at delivery

31 (± 4.19)

30 (± 5.19)

0.251

mother's weight in Kg

76 (± 17.26)

69 (± 16.09)

0.0131

1 This value is not significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. See discussion. 2Data was skewed due to a small number of women in both groups taking large dose vitamin supplements. When these women were removed from the analysis the result remained nonsignificant.

Validity of surveys

Seven cases and one study control declined to fill out their dietary surveys. Mean values were inserted in the multivariate analysis for these eight women. The validity of the dietary survey was demonstrated again for this study by linear regression analysis. Consistent with known homocysteine metabolism [23], a negative correlation existed between serum homocysteine and both red blood cell folate (r = 0.945 p = 0.0052) and serum folate (r = 0.932, p = 0.0001). Higher intake of dietary folate (including synthetic folic acid from supplements) as reported by the FFQ for the time of study was associated with higher serum folate (r = 0.941, p = 0.0001) and higher red blood cell folate (r = 0.949, p = 0.0166).

We did several checks to determine that the women were answering their surveys accurately. Comparisons of specific data items available in the women's MMSSP charts at the time of pregnancy with the data reported in the surveys showed excellent agreement for every item examined indicating women answered questions accurately. Women who reported smoking (as a quantitative value from 0–3 based on 1/2 packs/day smoked) showed a negative correlation with serum folate (r = 0.923, p = 0.0062) consistent with accurately reporting their smoking habits [24]. Based on the results of these tests of the validity of our surveys, we are confident that the information provided by our participants was accurate.

Analysis of FFQ survey and MMSSP data

The ethnicity of the infants born to the case mothers (based on the ethnicity reported for the infants grandparents) was 84% Caucasian, 5% Aboriginal. Mixed ethnicity was reported for 11% of the infants with one parent Caucasian and the other parent Aboriginal, or rarely Black or Asian. The ethnic distribution was the same for controls and is typical for the Manitoba population [25, 26]. There were also no significant differences between cases and controls with respect to their place of residence within the province (such as rural versus urban address).

There were no significant differences in dietary and supplemental intake of folate, B12, or B6, or in the biochemical parameters of case and control mothers. There was no difference in the percentage of cases and controls who reported taking prenatal vitamin supplements during pregnancy (37/48 cases and 55/72) or taking vitamin and/or folate supplements preconceptionally (17/48 cases and 25/72 study controls).

We attempted to divide our cases into smaller groups by type of pregnancy complication. We also separated isolated IUGR and IUGR associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Most of the groups lacked power for statistical analysis due to small numbers. However, normotensive women whose fetus had IUGR (N = 12) had a higher frequency of the C677T MTHFR variant compared to the population controls (q = 0.33, OR 2.58 95% CI, 1.78–3.73, p = 0.013). Homozygosity for the C677T MTHFR variant is associated with IUGR in women who do not take vitamin supplements according to one large study of Canadian women [10, 27]. Our findings are in agreement with this result as only 3/12 women took supplements. We found this effect in a group of combined heterozygous and homozygous women.

There was a trend towards higher mean weight for mothers who had complications at the time of MSAFP test in the individual comparisons, but this was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons (Table 2 and 3). The multivariate analysis did not reveal any unexpected associations, but it did show the importance of maternal weight as a variable (r = 0.933, p = 0.024). This was also not unexpected given that some of the complications we were examining are associated with obesity [28]. Even after controlling for women's weight in the multivariate analysis, the higher frequency of C677T MTHFR among cases remained significant (r = 0.734, p = 0.0462). There was no association between weight and MTHFR status (r = 0.431, p = 0.679).
Table 3

Comparison of the nonparametric characteristics of women with unexplained elevations of MSAFP according to those with and without complications of pregnancy.

Nonparametric Characteristics

Cases

Controls

p value

Location

   

   Winnipeg

44

63

0.854

   southern city

3

2

 

   southern town

3

5

 

   southern rural

8

8

 

   northern city

2

1

 

   northern town

1

4

 

   northern rural

5

7

 

ethnicity

  

0.972

   Caucasian

52

66

 

   Aborginal

2

2

 

   Mixed Caucasian/Aboriginal

7

6

 

   Mixed Caucasian/Black

1

3

 

   Asian

1

1

 

   Mixed Caucasian/Asian

1

1

 

   Unknown

3

1

 

diabetes in pregnancy

2/67

1/80

0.207

maternal smoking present (0 = nonsmoker, 1–3 = half pks/day increments)

0 = 47, 1 = 11, 2 or more = 9

0 = 60, 1 = 8, 2 or more = 12

0.721

gender of baby

27 females, 40 males

42 females, 38 males

0.352

parity = number of women

0 = 37, 1 = 20, 2 = 7, 3 or more = 3

0 = 40, 1 = 29, 2 = 7, 3 or more = 4

0.254

previous miscarriages

11/67

15/80

0.203

previous case pregnancy

1

0

0.967

Discussion

Unexplained elevations in MSAFP are known to be associated with an increased risk for complications of pregnancy [2]. Others have reported that presence of the C677T MTHFR variant in pregnant women with low folate intake is associated with increased risk for pregnancy complications [2, 2931]. The unique finding of this study is an increase in the frequency of the C677T MTHFR variant among women with normal folate intake, who went on to have complications of pregnancy after an unexplained elevation of MSAFP (Table 1).

The lack of folate deficiency in this population was unexpected, given previous research which showed that 23.6% of Newfoundland and Labrador women are folate deficient at their first prenatal visit [32]. As our study was retrospective, we did not have data on levels during pregnancy. It has recently been shown that the C677T MTHFR variant does not affect maternal serum homocysteine levels in pregnancy among women who take prenatal multivitamins [8]. Also a recent prospective study shows that there is no difference in homocysteine levels at midtrimester between women who later develop preeclampsia and those who do not [33].

As is the situation with NTDs, lack of folate deficiency by current definitions in a non-pregnant woman may not indicate that her folate intake is adequate for pregnancy. This would especially be true for women with the C677T MTHFR variant. Reexamination of the current definition of what constitutes a normal biochemical result for folate intake for women of child bearing age should be undertaken to clarify this.

We suggest that the negative effects of the C677T MTHFR variant are more likely to occur in early pregnancy before women began taking prenatal vitamins because the majority of our study participants took prenatal vitamins, but only 35% took preconceptional supplements. We suspect that reduced methylation interfering with cell proliferation in the placenta as originally suggested by Eskes (2000) [3].

In conclusion, using a retrospective case/control study, we have found that women with unexplained MSAFP elevations who have complications in later pregnancy are more likely to have the C677T MTHFR allele. Our resultsdo not suggest that C677T MTHFR predisposes a woman to having an elevation of MSAFP level (as we did not compare the C677T MTHFR frequency in women with and without elevated MSAFP), but having one or more copies of this variant predisposes such screen positive women to having complications in later gestation. It remains to be seen if other risk factors can be identified which can more accurately define this high risk group.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank R Singal, C Mesa, C Richmond, L Erdile, S Marles, A Chudley, C McLean, M Henke, K MacDonald, M Coggrave and M Baird for assistance with this study. We would also like to thank our participants, without whom such work would not be possible. This study was funded by the Children's Hospital Foundation of Manitoba, the Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus Association of Canada, the Garrod Association of Canada, the Manitoba Medical Services Foundation, and University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowships.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics,, University of Manitoba
(2)
Department of Pediatrics & Child Health,, University of Manitoba
(3)
Department of Community Health Sciences,, University of Manitoba,
(4)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences,, University of Manitoba

References

  1. Ross HL, Elias S: Maternal serum screening for fetal genetic disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997, 24: 33-47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. van Rijn M, van der Schouw YT, Hagenaars AM, Visser GH, Christiaens GC: Adverse obstetric outcome in low-and high-risk pregnancies: predictive value of maternal serum screening. Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 94: 929-934. 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00467-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eskes TK: Homocysteine and human reproduction. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 27: 157-167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eskes TK: Clotting disorders and placental abruption: homocysteine–a new risk factor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001, 95: 206-212. 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00492-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Raijmakers MT, Zusterzeel PL, Roes EM, Steegers EA, Mulder TP, Peters WH: Oxidized and free whole blood thiols in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 97: 272-276. 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01127-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferguson SE, Smith GN, Walker MC: Maternal plasma homocysteine levels in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Med Hypotheses. 2001, 56: 85-90. 10.1054/mehy.2000.1116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vollset SE, Refsum H, Irgens LM, Emblem BM, Tverdal A, Gjessing HK, Monsen AL, Ueland PM: Plasma total homocysteine, pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Hordaland Homocysteine study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000, 71: 962-968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Powers RW, Dunbar MS, Gallaher MJ, Roberts JM: The 677 C-T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation does not predict increased maternal homocysteine during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 101: 762-766. 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)03120-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morrison ER, Miedzybrodzka ZH, Campbell DM, Haites NE, Wilson BJ, Watson MS, Greaves M, Vickers MA: Prothrombotic genotypes are not associated with pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension: results from a large population-based study and systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2002, 87: 779-785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Infante-Rivard C, Rivard GE, Yotov WV, Genin E, Guiguet M, Weinberg C, Gauthier R, Feoli-Fonseca JC: Absence of association of thrombophilia polymorphisms with intrauterine growth restriction. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 19-25. 10.1056/NEJM200207043470105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Björklund NK, Evans JA, Greenberg CR: Association of thermolabile methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (C677T) with elevated maternal serum alpha fetoprotein. [Abstract]. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 67: 417-10.1086/302999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mogk RL, Rothenmund H, Evans JA, Carson N, Dawson AJ: The frequency of the C677T substitution in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene in Manitoba. Clin Genet. 2000, 58: 406-408. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580513.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Angus VC, Entwistle VA, Emslie MJ, Walker KA, Andrew JE: The requirement for prior consent to participate on survey response rates: a population-based survey in Grampian. BMC Health Serv Res. 2003, 3: 21-10.1186/1472-6963-3-21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fowler FJ, Gallagher PM, Stringfellow VL, Zaslavsky AM, Thompson JW, Cleary PD: Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members. Med Care. 2002, 40: 190-200. 10.1097/00005650-200203000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification. 1994, Utah: Medicode Publications, 4
  16. Björklund NK, Evans JA, Greenberg CR: Folic acid supplementation: more work is needed. CMAJ. 2000, 163: 1129-1130.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Health Canada: Primary Prevention of Neural Tube Defects with Folic Acid. [Electronic Citation]. Edited by: Health Canada. 2003, Government of CanadaGoogle Scholar
  18. Shipchandler MT, Moore EG: Rapid, fully automated measurement of plasma homocyst(e)ine with the Abbott IMx analyzer. Clin Chem. 1995, 41: 991-994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilson DH, Herrmann R, Hsu S, Biegalski T, Sohn L, Forsythe C, Novotny M, Beggs M, Manderino G: Ion capture assay for folate with the Abbott IMx analyzer. Clin Chem. 1995, 41: 1780-1781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenberg CR, Hamerton JL, Nigli M, Wrogemann K: DNA studies in a family with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and a deletion at Xp21. Am J Hum Genet. 1987, 41: 128-137.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rady PL, Szucs S, Grady J, Hudnall SD, Kellner LH, Nitowsky H, Tyring SK, Matalon RK: Genetic polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) in ethnic populations in Texas; a report of a novel MTHFR polymorphic site, G1793A. Am J Med Genet. 2002, 107: 162-168. 10.1002/ajmg.10122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. NCSS Statistical Systems for Windows. Kaysville, Utah: Dr. Jerry L Hintze. 2001
  23. Chango A, Potier DC, Boisson F, Guilland JC, Barbe F, Perrin MO, Christides JP, Rabhi K, Pfister M, Galan P, Hercberg S, Nicolas JP: 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase common mutations, folate status and plasma homocysteine in healthy French adults of the Supplementation en Vitamines et Mineraux Antioxydants (SU.VI.MAX) cohort. Br J Nutr. 2000, 84: 891-896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pagan K, Hou J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP, Tamura T: Effect of smoking on serum concentrations of total homocysteine and B vitamins in mid-pregnancy. Clin Chim Acta. 2001, 306: 103-109. 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00402-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chodirker BN, Erdile LB, MacDonald KM, Harman CR, Cheang MS, Evans JA: MSAFP levels in aboriginal Canadian women. Can J Public Health. 1994, 85: 424-426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Population by ethnic origin, 1996 Census, provinces and territories. [Electronic Citation]. Statistics Canada. 2003
  27. Infante-Rivard C, Rivard GE, Gauthier R, Theoret Y: Unexpected relationship between plasma homocysteine and intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Chem. 2003, 49: 1476-1482. 10.1373/49.9.1476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Castro LC, Avina RL: Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 14: 601-606. 10.1097/00001703-200212000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lachmeijer AM, Arngrimsson R, Bastiaans EJ, Pals G, ten Kate LP, de Vries JI, Kostense PJ, Aarnoudse JG, Dekker GA: Mutations in the gene for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, homocysteine levels, and vitamin status in women with a history of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 184: 394-402. 10.1067/mob.2001.109393.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gris JC, Quere I, Monpeyroux F, Mercier E, Ripart-Neveu S, Tailland ML, Hoffet M, Berlan J, Daures JP, Mares P: Case-control study of the frequency of thrombophilic disorders in couples with late foetal loss and no thrombotic antecedent–the Nimes Obstetricians and Haematologists Study5 (NOHA5). Thromb Haemost. 1999, 81: 891-899.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zusterzeel PL, Visser W, Blom HJ, Peters WH, Heil SG, Steegers EA: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms in preeclampsia and the HELLP syndrome. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2000, 19: 299-307. 10.1081/PRG-100101991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. House JD, March SB, Ratnam S, Ives E, Brosnan JT, Friel JK: Folate and vitamin B12 status of women in Newfoundland at their first prenatal visit. CMAJ. 2000, 162: 1557-1559.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. D'Anna R, Baviera G, Corrado F, Ientile R, Granese D, Stella NC: Plasma homocysteine in early and late pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia and isolated intrauterine growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004, 83: 155-158. 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00291.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Björklund et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement